Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
My Free Cams
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-A lot of models
-"Lounge" area for members
-Frequently activity in free viewing areas
-Private sessions recorded for later viewing |
Cons: |
-Navigating for niches sometimes awkward
-$5 / minute for a private session (more if you don't buy tokens in bulk) |
Bottom Line: |
Although searching for niches can be a little tricky, the site layout is generally good, and there are lots of models online so someone is bound to take your fancy. There are some risks involved, with members occasionally complaining about models not honouring large tips as promised, but in my experience most of the models are honest.
I'd like to say a few words about how much the models get as it is often a matter of interest. Tokens cost 8 to 10 cents each (they cost less if you buy in bulk). Models get five cents of this, which I believe is about as good a payout as these sites give. This means that the top 20 to 30 models logged on at any one time are making a very good living, there are a bunch of models who are doing OK, and there are a whole stack of models only making a few dollars an hour. The cost of living is lower in Romania, but a lot of girls find it very hard to get by on what they earn. This isn't myfreecams fault in my opinion, but it does seem to indicate that webcam sites in general have more girls on them than can be supported. It also indicates that even receiving $3/min for private sessions does not guarantee rich performers.
Webcam sites are often relatively expensive to visit (one private session can easily cost $50), but there is nowhere else you can get the personal interaction. If you want to get to know a model before she masturbates for you personally, a camsite is really the only online option, and myfreecams is an excellent example. |
|
09-16-12 06:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Lorna Morgan
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-Lorna Morgan (seriously, she's gorgeous)
-Picture sets are very good, and collected in convenient zip files |
Cons: |
-Videos low quality, older videos very low quality
-Updates have slowed / stopped
-Navigation appears broken in places (possibly due to a change of layout) |
Bottom Line: |
If you are a fan of Lorna Morgan (like me) you might want to join this site for one month, in which time you should be able to download everything you want. There are a few worthwhile videos here, but some of the older ones are too short and too low quality (and in mov format) to be worthwhile.
Of course the pictures are worthwhile. She has that sultry, natural smile and knows how to pose for a picture. Oh yeah, and then there's the breasts, which are awesome.
As somebody who goes more for videos than pics I was disappointed overall, but because it's Lorna Morgan I can't go lower than 75. |
|
09-16-12 07:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Fake Hub
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Attractive models
Female Agent a good version of fake-reality porn |
Cons: |
Download speeds
Advertising after login
Need to be very careful about onselling |
Bottom Line: |
I got into this site thanks to the Female Agent videos, which have the schtick of a female modelling agent convincing aspiring models (male or female) to try out on the casting couch. It's cheesey, but most of the women are pretty sexy (especially the agents). The other sites here are a nice bonus, and there are definitely extra scenes here that are worth watching (mostly b/g, so if you are strictly into lesbian there are only a few other scenes of interest).
The real kicker though are the download speeds. Two hour video downloads are not uncommon, and if you choose the wrong time of day it can be even longer. There are times when the download speeds are acceptable, most of the time they are not, so I won't be renewing my subscription. |
|
12-22-16 02:29am
Replies (1)
|
|