Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : rearadmiral (0)

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569) Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 151-175 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 151 Lubed (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 19 scenes in a specialty niche - Updates weekly - Many A-list stars - Exclusive scenes - Many options to view the scenes - Photos and screencaps available - High bitrates and framerates - Supports download managers Cons: - Small site (but growing weekly) - Should really be part of the Porn Pros Network until it grows - No TBP Discount Bottom Line: Lubed is a relatively new niche site from the Porn Pros people. The title and tag line of the site describe it well: this is wet sex with water, lube or oil creating a sexy sheen on some of the hottest models working today. The scenes don’t really have much of a set-up to them, which I usually find to be a negative, but in this case the models and the sex are so hot that I’m willing to forego the sexual tension of a good set-up. Being new, the site is relatively small, with 19 scenes currently available. The site updates regularly with one new scene being added each week. It’s a valid complaint that the site is really a bit too small to command the full price of a much larger site for now. It seems that Porn Pros has been creating these niche sites and selling them as separate sites rather than bundling them with their network or with other niche sites. I can complain about that business model, but the fact that I bought a membership to this and several other of the PP niche sites means that this business model does work. The site is well laid out, though with fewer than 20 scenes it would be hard to screw that up. There are 12 scenes per page with each having a medium-sized thumbnail. The scene name is listed, as is the name of the female talent. Speaking of the models, there is some variation in body types. While guys like me who prefer 18+ petite waifs will be pleased with models like Piper Perri and Rebel Lynn, members who prefer fuller-figured models like Keisha Grey will also have some scenes to enjoy. Given the messy nature of the scenes, many of them are shot partly or completely outdoors. Pools and hot tubs also work as sets. If you like that sort of thing, this site will have an added allure for you. The scenes are all exclusive and all are well shot and edited. Many outdoor scenes can get washed out in bright sunlight but these folks obviously have the talent and equipment to make outdoor scenes look good. Each scene opens into its own page where there are many options to stream or download the video. Streaming is available as HD or “standard.” I don’t stream so I can’t comment on the quality of each of those. One bit of good news is that the scene doesn’t start streaming automatically as with so many other sites. Downloads are available in 5 different MP4 resolutions and one resolution each for MPG and WMV. The MP4 resolutions are: (Resolution, framerate (fps), bitrate kb/s)) • 4096x2160, 59, 25,000 • 1920x1012, 59, 16,500 • 1280x674, 59, 6,800 • 852x450, 59, 3,135 • 640x338, 59, 1,900 The MPG file is 852x450, 59fps and 5,100kb/s and the WMV is 1281x674, 30fps and 6,900 kb/s. I’m open to correction on this, but the framerate is double what I’m used to seeing and the bitrates seem much higher than those used in scenes of comparable resolution on other sites. If you like MP4 files you’ll definitely find a good compromise between file size and picture sharpness here. Photos are available too. Screencaps are available as singles only and are 1280x674. Photos are available as singles or a zip and both come in at 1125x1500. There is a simple search function but given the size of the site that really isn't a selling feature yet. For people like me who like anal scenes, I can report that there are currently only three of those (Angel Smalls, Alice March and Keisha Grey). The bottom line is that this is a great and growing site that could really be improved with a lower price to reflect its small size or to have it bundled with a few other smaller sites to give better value at least until it grows. The porn itself is top-quality in every way: the models are hot, the sex is hot, the production values are high and the site is well laid out and offers many options. I certainly recommend that anyone who likes wet scenes like this check it out and weigh the value using your own scale. I’m certainly not disappointed that I joined. 06-13-16  05:38pm Replies (0) Review 152 Mary Alicia (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Very good-looking, natural model - Site appears to update (but that may end – see below) - Supports download managers - Simple design - Pics and vids available - Pics available as zips - Bills through CCBill Cons: - Not full nudity (T+A only) - The website doesn’t do the model justice - Resolutions for photos and videos are poor - Small site - Material seems to be removed periodically - Not a good value - Many (25+) dead links - No options for files sizes or types Bottom Line: First let me get this out of the way: I joined this site because I like Mary Alicia’s look. She’s petite, small breasts, beautiful bum, beautiful face (with freckles!), and captivating eyes. I have no complaints about Mary Alicia herself. The website, however, needs work. I can’t tell how old the site is because it appears that not all material is kept on the site. There is a link for ‘archived galleries” where older sets are listed. That’s not a bad idea, but since you can’t actually access those sets what’s the point? Server space is pretty cheap these days, and the whole site has less than 5GB on it, so why remove material? The site reports that at any given time there are between 70 and 100 photo sets available, though there are closer to 200 now, which is a mix of updated sets and older sets. I can say with some certainty that the site has been around since at least 2002 since one gallery announced that it was number 900 since that year. That also means that Mary Alicia may be pushing 30 now, but she doesn’t look it. The site does appear to update, though not on a set schedule. The sets are dated by month and day, but not by year so it is impossible to tell how old the sets are. Within each picture set there are varying numbers of photos, though to have more than 50 photos in a set is rare. The sets are described on the site, but the set name is non-descriptive so if you find some sets you like you’ll have to rename them on your own. The pictures are available as singles or as a zip file. The biggest letdown for the photos is the quality of the images. The resolutions would be considered acceptable by standards a few years ago but by today’s standards they’re barely average. The best resolution I could find on the site was 968x1400. Most are 968x1300. Maybe I’m asking for too much by wanting a higher resolution. It is also possible that the photos were taken some years ago and were high res then. Videos are available though the problem with most of them is the camera. Apparently Mary Alicia does (did?) a regular webcast and most of the videos are simply captures of those webcasts. The resolution on those is just 320x240 at 140kb/s. There are a handful of videos that are posted at 640x480 at 2100kb/s, but those are rare. Several of the videos are just slideshows of photos. There are less than 40 videos on the site. For all the photos and videos there are no options for files sizes. For videos, the only format is wmv. One choice that Mary Alicia has made will likely limit her audience. This is definitely a softcore site. While there are other women on the site, there is only posing. Don’t look for hot girl-on-girl action here. And don’t expect to see Mary Alicia’s naughty bits either. I can understand a choice to not do b/g or g/g sex on camera, and I can even understand an unwillingness to do ‘spread shots,’ but if she’s gone this far, it seems odd to not let us have a peek at the Holiest of Holies. While I don’t understand it, I can admit that it actually does add something to her mystique. The site itself is very simple, but it doesn’t need to be complex. There are links to photos and videos on separate pages. That’s pretty much it. There are ‘bonus’ links too, where Mary Alicia has a forum, some FAQs, and a few more photoshoots. This site’s updating days may be coming to and end. Mary Alicia posted a message recently stating that she is pregnant and hasn’t yet decided if she will continue. If she doesn’t, I hope the site continues as she is a very beautiful model. If she does, the guys with a pregnancy fetish may want to take note. I’ll admit that it is entirely possible that this is outdated information as no years are given with the updates. She could have been pregnant two years ago for all I know. So would I recommend this site? I would if you meet a certain criterion: if you go to the tour page and find that Mary Alicia is just your type (as was the case for me) then go ahead and join. With CCBill as the biller, you can be confident in security and ease of cancelling. At least you can go in informed and knowing the site’s limits. I don’t want to downplay this as an option: Mary Alicia is VERY good looking and I’m sure many people would agree with that. I certainly don’t regret taking a membership, but I wish there was more material. If, however, you prefer a different look in your models, then don’t bother. The site’s design and limitations wouldn’t make it worth your while to open your wallet. 11-05-11  08:55am Replies (2) Review 153 Massage Creep (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of PornPros Network - Discount through TBP / PU - Multiple download options - Streaming available - No DRM - Watermark is small enough to be ignored - Pics available (both separate and screecaps) - Pics available as a zip - Supports download managers - 60 exclusive scenes (as of review date) - Site updates weekly Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD Bottom Line: I wouldn’t normally review two sites within the same network, but I have to make an exception here because of the quality of this site. I recently reviewed Jurassic Cock from the same network but think Massage Creep deserves a specific review. I’m not normally a big fan of sites that use a narrow and limiting set-up. I find that the repetition gets boring. With a site featuring a male massaging a female, how much innovation and difference can you bring to each scene? Not much. But… even with the limiting set-up, the scenes on this site just seem to work well. I’ve never had a membership to a massage site and I didn’t join this network for this site, but it was a pleasant surprise to find to be as good as it is. The set-up is predictable: the male masseur brings his equipment to a scheduled appointment at a girl’s house or apartment. He sets up and instructs the girl to undress and slip under the sheet on the table. The camera gives the viewer a ‘hidden camera’ perspective as the model undresses and gets under the sheet. Then the massage begins, with lots of baby oil being used. The massage eventually progresses to where the sheet is removed and towel placed over the model – with camera angles giving the viewer some nice views. Eventually the model rolls over, with towels being strategically placed for modesty. Eventually the naughty bits get massaged with oil, and then the “deep tissue” massage begins. And in a bit of marketing genius, the masseur always includes a “free facial” at the end of the session. While using the same set-up over and over again for all of the 60 scenes sounds boring and repetitive, it still works. In my opinion, it works for two reasons: the acting is good and models are stunning. There isn’t a lot of variety in the types of models, so this could be a deal-breaker if you like older (25+) or fuller-figured models since the majority of the models are young and petite. This site is part of the PornPros network and the technical bits are the same as I listed in my review of Jurassic Cock. The highlights of the technical stuff are that there is streaming and download available. Downloads are available in MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. I’m not convinced that the HD is true HD. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate.) Photos are available (both actual photos and screencaps) and zips are available. The photos are hi-res and look great. One complaint I have that is purely subjective is that the entire network, including this site has very little anal sex. There is one scene listed as including anal, but I think that’s in error. I didn’t see any buggery in the scene. If you’re interested in a massage site I can definitely recommend this one. I don’t have experience with any other massage sites, but this one is definitely worth the price of admission. Joining through TBP/PU gets you a discount too. Plus you get access to the rest of the network with some other excellent sites. 05-17-11  08:10am Replies (4) Review 154 Massive Access (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large catalogue of DVDs and scenes - Rarely served niches available here - Huge range of tags for sorting scenes - Access to many older titles - TBP/PU discount - Supports download managers Cons: - Very little HD material offered - Most scenes are low resolution - Over-reliance on compilations - Scenes aren't linked with the DVD where they appear Bottom Line: The last time I reviewed this site I scored it fairly high and I saw it as more of a network with a collection of sites. Now, three years later, I’m rethinking both of those positions. I’ve scored it lower because it now does more wrong than right, and when a ‘network’ also offers one main site where all their material is available I now view those niche ‘sites’ as being more like tags for sorting. I really don’t recall what the site looked like or how it was laid out three years ago when I was last a member but it now comes across as wanting to be a competitor to Videobox. If that’s true it misses the mark by a wide margin. MA has many of the weaknesses of VB without having any of its strengths. The site currently has 7,475 DVDs uploaded. They also show 39,745 scenes as being available. For a DVD-based site they have a serious flaw in that if you open a scene it isn’t linked in any way to the DVD where it’s from and there is no information the DVD either. It appears that all the scenes are on DVDs but I can’t say that for certain. I wouldn’t join on the expectation that you’ll get access to the DVDs AND get access to a lot of scenes too. I don’t think the site works that way though it isn't obvious. (I also have to admit that while it appears that all the scenes offered in the niche sites are taken from DVDs on the main site I can’t be certain that they all are. The way all the sites are structured makes that determination impossible. The effect may be that the site looks much larger than it really is.) While the numbers of DVDs (and/or scenes) is impressive they only have 140 DVDs in HD. Where no HD is offered there are four resolutions of MPEG4 files available and listed as bitrates: 2000, 750, 500 and ‘portable.’ For the few HD scenes here those are offered as 1080 and 720 (1920x1080 6000kb/s and 1080x720 4000kb/s, respectively). The highest bitrate scenes in SD come in at 640x480 and 2000kb/s. To be fair MA has access to a lot of older porn from the 1990s and 2000s (which I see as a great asset for the site) so I can’t expect a lot better, but when VB uploads two HD DVDs per day MA looks to be lacking. Don’t join here expecting a lot of quality because you won’t find it. (Of the scenes 39,745 only 2020 are in HD.) Updates are another area where MA is lacking. But with the way the site doesn’t link scene selections with the DVDs they’re from it can be a little hard to tell. If sorting by DVD it appears that a DVD hasn’t been added in almost three months but when sorting by scene the update schedule is better. There doesn’t appear to be a regular update schedule but it appears that at least one scene is added per week and in some cases two scenes may be added per week. When you contrast that with VB’s upload of five DVDs per day MA comes up short. One weakness that this site and VB share is an over-reliance on compilations. It’s less acute here at MA but it is still obvious. MA has a broad tag system for selecting scenes with approximately 115 niches tagged. The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links timing out, though with the file sizes being so small that shouldn’t be an issue anyway. I also found no download limits were imposed. One advantage that MA has over its competition is that they offer porn in a lot of niches that aren't widely available on other similar sites. For example, they offer a lot of black-themed titles. Not interracial, but actually black-themed. Also, there is what I would call ‘senior porn.’ Not old men fucking young women or vice versa, but actually titles where all the talent is older. Finally, the site offers some gay material too, which seems odd on a straight-oriented site. The bottom line is that I’d only recommend this site to get access to some specific titles or studios that aren't offered elsewhere. Other than that this site comes up short in more ways than it succeeds. While it offers a low price through TBP/PU that low price isn't enough to offset the low resolutions for most of the videos. If you’re looking for an all-you-can-eat-buffet approach to porn you’re better off joining Videobox. VB is a much better value for your porn dollars. 12-13-14  01:20pm Replies (0) Review 155 Massive Access (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large collection of sites - Extremely diverse for a mainstream network - TBP / PU discount (see note below and my comment from November 18, 2011) - Multiple formats / resolutions available - Streaming available - Supports download managers - Decent download speed - Seems to be updating - Good value Cons: - Doesn’t bill through one of the better known billers (Safebilling) - Many older videos aren’t offered in multiple formats - Optimistic in reporting number of scenes and some scene resolutions - Photos are not available as zips - No anal-themed site Bottom Line: I’m not normally a fan of mega-sites, but the discount on this one made it interesting and I wanted access to a few of the niche sites so it made sense to join. My overall impression is that it is a good site, but it over-promises and under-delivers. Not by much, and not enough for me to tell you to avoid it, but it does have some weaknesses. It is a large network with a reported 107 sites on the covering the broadest range of fetishes I’ve ever encountered. The majority of the sites are b/g hardcore though there are scenes featuring BBWs, Black BBW, fucking machines, animated porn, food sex, midgets, MILFs, women over 60 and hairy women. There are also 13 sites featuring transsexuals. Interestingly, there are five sites of gay scenes too, which I don’t think I’ve ever seen on a primarily straight network, but given the broad range of interests they cover these don’t really seem out of place. If there could be a complaint about the diversity of sites it might be that it’s trying to be too diverse. I joined to get access to some relatively mainstream porn with attractive young lasses doing nasty things. Each midget scene (no offence meant to those of less stature) means one less scene with a more mainstream interest. The one ‘niche’ missing is anal sex. There are anal scenes scattered around, but no anal site. You can select a tab that tells you how many scenes are in each site but unless I’m missing something their counts seem wildly optimistic. Matrix Models, for example, boasts of 1726 scenes but I only see a little over 300. That’s not bad, but to be off by a factor of six seems a bit odd. Other sites show the same optimism when giving stats on the number of scenes. It isn’t that big a deal though because there is still a lot of material here. Videos can be streamed in three qualities and in many cases in HD. I didn’t use the streaming so I can’t comment on it. Most videos can be downloaded in either wmv or MPEG4 format. MPEG4s are offered in several resolutions, ranging from iPod quality to HD (320x210, 540x500, 640x480 and 1280x720). I prefer wmv format and most videos are offered in that format at a decent, though not stellar, resolution. One issue I have is that like the number of scenes in each site, the resolutions reported for some wmv files are a bit optimistic. I checked this with several files to make sure I just didn’t stumble on a lone file in a vast collection and found it repeatedly: the site says you’re downloading a 720x540 video but what you’re getting is 640x360 at 2100kb/s. That isn’t a huge difference, but it is enough to be noticeable and it is misrepresenting the file. I don’t download mp4 or MPEG4s usually and I didn’t much of those here either but with the MPEGs that I did download they seemed to more accurately labeled for file size. One beef I had was that a lot of the older videos with stars I like to collect were not available in wmv format. The vast majority of material is offered in wmv – it’s mostly the stuff that was made a decade or more ago. Pictures are also available, but they aren’t available as zips so I didn’t download any. They appeared to be mostly screencaps. A lot of the content here is not exclusive. I found many scenes that I have from various well-known porn DVDs. If you have a huge collection of porn, particularly DVD porn, you’ll likely find some overlap. But… there is still a lot of material here but I don’t think much of it is actually exclusive. If I’m wrong I hope someone corrects this in a comment. I’m not saying that this is good or bad, but a lot of the scenes had a watermark from Porn.com. I’m not familiar with that site but Googling it makes me think it’s a tube site. I don’t know if that is true or not, but Massive Access is definitely a membership driven site. I have no idea what, if any, connection exists between the sites. The site appears to updating with new scenes added daily. I see in his earlier review here that Robbi81 stated that he thought the dates of scenes were being manipulated to give the impression that the site was updating when it isn’t. He didn’t explain that comment, but I have no reason to believe that the site is dormant. Even if I’m wrong, the site is worth a membership given the price and size. Speaking of price, neither TBP or PU mention a discounted price on the Massive Access page. I’m not sure if there is a discount if you join through the main network page but I joined through one of the specific sites, My Stepdaughter Ate My Ass (yes, I’m a pervert, but so are you!) and was offered a discount that gave me access to what appears to be everything. Even if it isn’t everything, it’s still a great value. For the few flaws the network has I’d still recommend it because at the TBP/PU discount it’s a good value. The videos aren’t exclusive and they resolutions aren’t great, but there is a lot of interesting porn here. 11-21-11  04:34pm Replies (4) Review 156 Max Hardcore (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - It’s Max Hardcore, dammit!. If you like Max, then you’ll love this site - A decent selection of 200+ scenes from many of his movies - Fast downloads - Pictures too, if that’s your cup ‘o tea Cons: - Well, if you don’t like Max hardcore, he would be the biggest reason to not join - The resolution on many of the videos is poor - The videos are broken down into too many clips and there are no other DL options - The site is a bit confusing and not laid out particularly well - ‘Classic’ Max is under-represented Bottom Line: Let’s face it: Max Hardcore is an acquired taste. If you like Max and don’t already have a huge Max collection you’ll be satisfied with this site. If you don’t like Max you’ll be offended by this site. In my experience, this is the roughest site on the ‘net. On a scale of 1 to 10 Max scores a 10 for rough sex. The closest I've seen is from Sweet Entertainment, which might be an 8.5 compared to Max. Some people might say that the new sites by Kink.com are close, but they’re in a different league. Kink trains subs. Max goes nuts on young women. As for technical stuff, Max Hardcore.com could use some improvement. The navigation is tricky at times but the biggest drawbacks are the number of clips you need to DL and the resolution of most of them once you do get them. As for the number of clips, I followed a recommendation by “apoctom’ in the comments section and DLed the free trial of Internet Download Manager. Using a DL manager isn’t optional unless you’re unemployed and have nothing better to do. The bottom line for me was that as a long-time Max fan (since about 1994) this was a no-brainer. If you like Max, this site is a great way to get your fix. I live in a country where Max DVDs tend to not be allowed in the border anymore, so this is my only fix. For those of you in the U.S., this is probably the only way that you can get the European versions of Max. 11-13-07  03:37pm Replies (4) Review 157 Melissa Pass (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Five sites of four good-looking amateurs - Supports download managers - Bills through CC Bill Cons: - Site is dated - Videos low resolution - Most videos are broken into parts even though they’re very small - Photos not available in zips - Undated uploads but doesn’t appear to be updating Bottom Line: I joined this small network based on the tour pages and the sample videos that I was able to download and watch. The problem with this approach is that I figured that the size and resolution of the videos were low and small precisely because they were previews. After joining the site I learned that the quality in the member’s pages was no better. I joined primarily because the sites in the network seemed to have a public nudity theme and that’s a niche I’m interested in. For fans of that genre there is a fair bit here but the network’s shortcomings likely outweigh any advantages. To be fair, this is some decent public nudity. Where it loses marks in my measure is that they trade off brazenness for heat. Val, for example, makes a lot out of her arrest and 30 days in jail for public nudity and then flaunts that by wearing pasties and panties that match her skin tone to attract more police attention. There isn't a lot of sexual heat in those shoots. There is some girl/girl and very little boy/girl (oral only) so don’t join expecting to see these models in hardcore action. The network has five sites but one of them is a cam site and I didn’t check it out. I’m not really into those and I don’t want to risk additional charges for something I don’t want. So this review is of the four solo girl sites on the network. The four models are all young, petite and attractive. They all have a wholesome look popular in many amateur models. The girls and their sites are: • Val Midwest – 45 videos and photo sets • Melissa Midwest – 40 videos and 96 photo sets • Foxy Jacky – 20 videos and 76 photo sets • Sweet Adri – 12 videos and 79 photo sets The site has some fairly serious flaws for both video and photo collectors. For video collectors the biggest drawbacks will be the low resolutions used and the fact that even short videos tend to be broken into parts. The highest resolutions I saw were 720x480 which are marginal at best. But when you consider that some of these videos have bitrates below 1000kb/s those are well below current standards. The best of the videos aren’t that good and the worst are badly pixilated. Some of the videos are 640x480. I can’t give you photo guys much information here. I don’t normally collect photos but I certainly don’t if I have to download them one at a time. Yes, this site doesn’t offer zipped photosets. You may be thinking that the reason for these problems is that these videos and pictures were made many years ago. That’s a fair question but since one model has videos and photos of her 2013 appearance in Hustler magazine it seems that the site does have newer content. Much of the material here could be older though based on a comment that exotics4me made in 2013 about having been a member there ‘years ago.’ I can’t provide any clear answer on whether any of the sites updates or not as they don’t date any of the uploads. I’ve been a member less than a week and my plan is to cancel my membership today and not bother going back. Even if there were new uploads the resolutions are so low as to not have me too interested in getting them. The good news about cancelling is that the site bills through CC Bill so that won’t be a problem. My educated guess, however, is that none of the sites are updating on any regular schedule. The site supports download managers but the file sizes are so small that they aren’t really needed. I can’t say if this will be an issue with other users and I’ll be cancelling my membership and have no reason to go back, but while it is true that you get access to 5 sites with your network membership you must sign in through the site you joined through. Once in that site you have access to all the sites. What I don’t know is if the content on the additional sites is limited in any way. I have no way to check that. If you do choose to join you’ll note that they offer a three-month membership. My advice is to avoid that. I downloaded 90% of the videos from the four girl’s sites in less than an hour. The bottom line is that unless you must have photos and videos from these specific models you’re best to spend your porn dollars elsewhere. The monthly fee is $30 and that’s very high for what you get. The models are hot, and there is definitely some interesting stuff for fans of public nudity, but the videos are too low resolution to have any real collectable value. And if you need the photos be prepared for a lot of clicking on your mouse. My advice is that if you’re interested you should consider this carefully: it’s a lot of money for some not-very-good porn. 12-08-14  03:38pm Replies (0) Review 158 MetArt (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Enormous site - Huge selection of beautiful models - Models are natural (few fake breasts and tattoos) - Supports download managers - No obvious timeouts on downloads - Good download speeds - High-resolution photos are stunning quality - Options for picture quality - Zips available - Over 1000 videos - Videos available in different formats - Newer videos in HD - Best search function I’ve ever encountered - Excellent value Cons: - Site may be too softcore for some - Site is so large it can be a bit overwhelming Bottom Line: Why did a guy who likes hardcore videos join a softcore photo site, even after I commented that the site was too soft for me? Simple: they emailed me an offer I couldn’t refuse, so I joined. I usually take a short while to get used to site navigation and start figuring out how I’ll go at browsing the site and finding stuff I want. I started that here and quickly realized that this really wasn’t like any other site I’ve ever been a member at. This site is HUGE. I normally try to provide accurate details on what a prospective member can expect from a site. So if a site has 500 videos, I’ll tell you that. With this site, the best I can say is that it is enormous. There are many hundreds of models, maybe a thousand even, each with multiple photo shoots and many with video clips. Just choosing a model to look at can be a daunting task. While on the topic of models, I can’t complain because the type of model on the site is what I look for: young and natural. With a site this size there is lots of variation on body type. I can download the small-breasted lasses while you download the larger-breasted models and neither of us will feel cheated. Same with hair colour. I love redheads and there a dozens of them here. Blondes and brunettes abound. Different ethnicities are represented and there are a few models who are 35 years old. One thing the models do lack are fake breasts and lots of ink. A vast majority of the models are all natural. Many sport pubic hair even. Remember that? I should note, because of the above, that the advanced search function is like nothing I’ve ever encountered before. It allows searching for narrow parameters and the site is so large you’re apt to get some returns. Want some pics of a 30 year old Asian with full pubic hair? If it exists on the site it is easy to find. The site would be unmanageable without this excellent tool. This is primarily a photo site. Anyone thinking of joining this site needs to know that. The site has been around for many years, and I didn’t sample all of the older material. But I can say this with some confidence: they push the limits of technology now so I have no reason to think that they didn’t then. Photos are available as singles, or in a zipped file. High, medium and low resolutions are available. I didn’t sample the lower two resolutions but the high-res photos are stunning quality at 3744x5616. They’re amazing. Obviously older photos won’t be in that resolution. There are some videos available and those are mostly videos of the photoshoots. Some of the older videos are horrible quality, but I won’t hold that against them as it isn’t a video site and those were uploaded years ago. Videos are available in streaming (multiple sizes) and downloads (multiple formats). The default is mp4 though wmv is always available too. The standard resolution for videos (all but the oldest stuff) is 1280x720 @ 4,300kb/s. The wmv files are in codec 9 and play at 30 fps. Higher resolutions are not uncommon. Subjectively, these videos look stunning. Videos tend to be fairly short, with some less than five minutes long. With the technical stuff, the site is as good as with the artistic stuff. There are multiple updates each day, download speeds are good, download managers are permitted and there are no obvious timeouts on download links. I realize the 800lb gorilla in the room with Met Art is that many people see it as being too sterile. It’s as if they stripped the sensuality from their models. I can understand that criticism, but I don’t share it to the same level as some other reviewers. While the site lacks the playfulness that is often found on ALS Scan and FTV Girls, they can be erotic. Where some other solo model sites can be overtly sexual, Met Art is more sensual. There is no hardcore sex on the site at all. I can understand how many would find this simply too soft. I suspect that this is highly subjective though. For example, there is a lot of outdoor posing and posing by and in water which I like so that’s going to improve my perception of the site. I’m left with an odd conclusion. I can definitely recommend this site: I liked it and I’m glad I joined. But I probably won’t put it on my list of sites to rejoin. The reason for that has nothing to do with the quality of the site or the models. The reason is 100% subjective. For a guy who likes sites like Sinnistar and Public Disgrace I’m way out of my element in Met Art. But if you like stunning quality photos of stunning women you really can’t go wrong with Met Art. You could spend months browsing around the site is so large. One final note for the photographers: please don’t pose models with farm animals. It’s weird. Actually, make that ‘don’t pose models with animals.” Period. It’s weird. 01-10-12  03:39am Replies (10) Review 159 Microminimus (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Broad range of model types - Logically laid out - Good mix of amateur and pro models - High quality photos - Low annual price Cons: - Photos only, no videos - No zip options - Multiple clicks to get to high-res pics - Some overlap with their free site - Some topless, none nude - No monthly membership, annual only Bottom Line: This isn’t a porn site in the traditional sense. I’m merely stating an objective fact for prospective members rather than making a subjective judgment. Whether the site is worth joining is probably up to how much you like what they have to offer, which, I guess, is one way that this is definitely like a porn site. Microminimus is the ‘community’ site for Wicked Weasel Bikinis. WW is an Australian swimwear company known for making ‘barely there’ swimwear like micro-thongs. They also offer swimwear made of see-through material. There are also some accessories, but the overall theme of the company is skimpy swimwear. This site offers photos of WW’s professional models as well as submissions from their happy customers. The site is logically laid out. Photos can be sorted by newly added, updated, popular and wallpapers. Also on offer are photo sets from ‘competitions.’ These are set around a theme, Christmas, for example, and users submit photos and members vote on them. I find these are a great mix and so far I’ve spent a lot of my time on the site here. There are also archives for Cover Girls (seems that this can be a pro or amateur) and contributor archives. Another advantage is that they offer archives of the photos of their professional models that they use at their main site where they sell their bikinis. There does appear to be some overlap between what is available for free at the commercial site and this ‘community’ site though I really have no idea how extensive that overlap is. There is a difference though: on the free site you only get lower-res photos while on the paid site you get access to higher-res photos. That may not be such a big deal though as the low-res photos on the free site are close and in some cases larger than the low-res photos on the paid site. (The low-res on both free and pay are approximately 950x663.) The higher resolution photos come in at 853x1280. That’s not much of a difference and it might not be a big enough difference to counter the work you have to go through to get the higher-res photos. The only lure for spending the $25 annual fee to join will probably be access to more photos, not higher-res photos. The way the site is laid out and the overlap among how the galleries are organized it is pretty much impossible for me to say with any certainty how many galleries and photos there are here. There are certainly hundreds of photos, and more likely well over a thousand. Ten thousand? I doubt it. Because the site relies so much on user-submitted photos there are a broad range of model types here. There are models who look like they could easily get modelling work at legitimate fashion shoots, models who could easily get work on adult sets, and models who probably shouldn’t model. I realize that may seem harsh, but some women shouldn’t wear WW bikinis. You don’t see me flaunting my 46-year-old body in a speedo. (Photos available upon request…) The photo types themselves vary, but there is one certainty: this site doesn’t have full nudity. Some of the models go topless, some don’t. Some of the photo competitions specifically prohibit topless submissions. I find this very odd. Why make that choice? My guess is that the photos can then be used as marketing on their public site to drive sales. Even with the ban on nudity many of the photos can be pretty risqué. We are, after all, seeing photos of women in micro-mini bikinis that are often made out of translucent material. Some of us older guys can still draw on the days when our imaginations played a role in arousal. If the site has a major flaw (and it DOES have a major flaw) it is that there are no gallery zips offered. So if you like a particular model or theme then be prepared to work to get what you want. To make matters worse, clicking on a photo opens the lower-res version. To get the higher-res version you have to go near the upper-left corner of the screen a click an icon which will then open the high-res photo in a new window. Then you can save it. And close the new window. And go back on the original page to click on another photo to start the labourious process all over again. If I wanted a hobby that required work I’d take up cabinetry. So can I recommend this site? No, I can’t, but I don’t feel too bad about that since this really isn’t a site that fits well here either. I think the target market for this site is someone who’s girlfriend posts pics here and you want to show those off. If they offered zips I might lean to recommending it (but probably still wouldn’t). If they offered video I might think about recommending it, but they don’t. The good news is that it isn’t expensive at $25 per year. The bad news is that I now have to remember to cancel the membership in 11 months. 02-01-13  04:01pm Replies (4) Review 160 Mike Adriano (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large collection of DVDs / scenes - 23 ‘sites’ - Many top models - Videos offered in multiple resolutions - Supports download managers - Increased time-out on links - True HD looks excellent - Updates regularly Cons: - Not a true network - Membership can be tricky to cancel - Update schedule can be confusing - Updates loaded to more than one site - Updates are available only as streaming for a few days before allowing downloads Bottom Line: Many of the opinions and details I wrote in my earlier review are still valid, but after re-subscribing to this site several times since I think it deserves a new review and a higher score. The first thing to point out is that while this collection of sites is billed as a network, it really isn’t in the true sense of the word. This ‘network’ would work just as well, and probably better, if they just had one large site. Arguing against their classification as a network is the fact that each site isn’t updated individually but a DVD is added regularly and added to one or several of the sites where that genre fits. That means that an update can often be found on several of the sites, and it also means that some of the sites only get rare updates. The ‘network’ is a group of 23 sites many of which cater to a specific niche. I included a list in my last review and that is pretty much still accurate though there have been a few sites added since. I can’t really pin down the update schedule as updates are added to the individual sites and can’t be tracked as overall network updates. Adding to the confusion is that an update might be added to several sites at the same time. This site (like the other Fame Digital sites) updates by allowing streaming only for several days. I’m sure they have a good reason for updating this way, but as a subscriber who prefers to download it can be a bit annoying to have to check back regularly to see if a scene you want has been unlocked for downloading. One big change for the network since I last reviewed it is worth noting. In the past a complaint I had with all of Fame Digital’s sites was that while they allowed download managers those were difficult to use since the links timed out quickly. All the Fame Digital sites I’ve subscribed to in the past few months now have much longer time outs on the links. I can’t say how long for certain, but they seem to be at least an hour before they time out. A negative to any Fame site now is that they’ve made cancelling your membership more difficult. For anyone subscribing to any Fame site I strongly recommend that you keep your email confirmation as it will identify the link you need to follow to cancel. I just cancelled two Fame memberships and each had to be cancelled through a different site. To cancel you need to enter your username and password and a captcha. That seems insignificant, but the cancel process is more involved than it needs to be. I can’t imagine why Fame has chosen this because so many of their sites are so good that I’m sure they get a lot of repeat customers. I should also point out that while cancelling a membership a few weeks ago the cancel sites weren’t working and I had to use online chat. That worked fine, but the process took about 15 minutes. This network, like all Fame sites, now offers everything they upload in HD. They list it as 1080, 720 and 540. I used to prefer WMV files and that meant that I couldn’t download true HD scenes since those are only available as mp4s. I’ve since switched to mp4 and since I’m a big fan of a lot of the directors and actresses here I downloaded the best quality they had to offer. Those come in at 1920x1080 at 7,000 kb/s and 30fps. The downside is that the files are large, with some topping out over 3GB. The trade-off is that a lot of the scenes are long, running nearly an hour, and the video quality is incredible. This is among the best video quality I’ve ever encountered. I’ve seen other sites that have the same specs, but the videos aren’t nearly as crisp as these. However they’re encoded, Fame Digital is doing it right. Members should note that there is some overlap with this network and the Evil Angel site. That can be bad if you have a membership to both, but it can also be good in that if you’re looking for a specific title you can check both sites because it may be uploaded earlier to one site than the other. The network allows prospective members to see everything that is available, but the preview pages don’t allow you to sort by DVD title, only by scene. Once you’ve joined there is the option to sort by DVD. A pro or con (depending on how you feel about this) is that once you subscribe to a Fame site you’re on their mailing list. The bad news is that you’ll get a lot of email from them, but the good news is that you’ll get a lot of good offers. This network offers a TBP/PU discount, but many of the email offers were for a lower price than that. The bottom line is that this is an excellent collection of sites that gives easy access to what they have. Download speeds are good, and there are a range of resolutions available including some top notch video quality. Much of what is offered here is harder than some PU members like, and anal sex is featured in a lot of what’s offered, but if you like high quality porn with some of the top female talent working in porn today you can’t go wrong here. 07-21-13  08:15am Replies (4) Review 161 Mike Adriano (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Fame Digital Network (but a different set of sites offered through other memberships - 20 sites (see below for list) - Wide variety of porn - Access to some 90s ‘classics’ - Download options - Streaming available - Some HD available - Updates - Supports Free Download Manager (but not well) Cons: - Network is updated with an additional scene regularly, not each site - Problems with free Download Manager - No zips for pics / screencaps - Not a lot of HD Bottom Line: This isn’t just a rehash of the Devil’s Film review I did a few months ago. Both this site and Devil’s Film are part of the Fame Digital Network but they offer completely different sites. Joining this site gave me access to a total of 20 different sites, and since this site is small, consider this more a review of the entire network – remembering, of course, that Fame Digital seems to offer at least two networks. The same TBP discount is offered here, but I was emailed an offer I couldn’t refuse ($5 for a month) so I joined because I really like some of the sites (and directors) offered here. The membership to this part of the network is smaller in number of sites and the sizes of those site, but it is still a good value at the TBP discount. The site follows the exact same format as the other Fame Digital network. There are options to sort by DVD or scene, theme, series name, and you can search by star. I found this network to be less organized that the larger Fame Digital one in that even sorting by DVD there were some loose scenes thrown in that weren’t associated with any title, though they clearly belonged to a DVD. My preference (for better or worse) is for wmv format. There is a limit here in that HD isn’t offered in wmv, but only in mp4. But HD isn’t offered on everything and not even on all the new updates. For each option, there are multiple resolutions available depending on what file size you want. I downloaded the highest resolution wmv files and while they aren’t HD, they aren’t too bad. Resolutions vary slightly but most are offered in 720x480 at 2000+ kbps. Like the other Fame Digital network, pics are available but they’re only screcaps and they aren’t zipped. The network is updating, but as near as I can tell it updates only one scene for the entire network per day. That might not be great, but for the amount of material here it is a good value. As with the last time I had a Fame Digital membership, Free Download Manager had problems. I don’t know if the links timed out or what, but it wasn’t worth it to line up a bunch of sites and walk away because FDM would hit a broken link and that would cascade down the list. If you want more information on the technical bits please check my review of Devil’s Film. The technical information is the same. This network has the following sites: (please note that DVD numbers are approximate because sorting by DVD title still includes scenes not associated with a title) 1. Anal Acrobats: 275 scenes, 50 titles from Jay Sin. 2. Buttman: 500+ scenes from 100 titles from John Stagliano. 3. Christoph Clark Online: 560 scenes from100 titles 4. Christoph’s Big Natural Tits: 133 scenes from 24 titles 5. Cock Choking Sluts: 190 scenes from 32 titles by Jake Malone 6. Euro Angels: 480 scenes from 83 titles by Christopher Clarke (who appears to be the same as ‘Christoph Clark’) 7. Gaping Angels: 317 scenes from 58 titles by Christoph Clark 8. I Love Black She-males: 51 scenes from 19 titles by Joey Silvera 9. Jake Malone: 234 scenes from 40 titles 10. Jay Sin XXX: 272 scenes from 50+ titles 11. Joey Silvera: 349 scenes from 54 titles 12. John Leslie: 324 scenes from 64 titles 13. Jonni Darko XXX: 429 scenes from 53 titles 14. Mike Adriano: 65 scenes from 11 titles 15. Milk Enema: 43 scenes from 10 titles 16. Nacho Vidal Hardcore: 126 scenes from 24 titles 17. POV Blowjobs: 271 scenes from 20 titles 18. She Plays with her Cock: 165 scenes from 15 titles 19. She-male Idol: 225 scenes from 36 titles 20. Strap Attackers: 84 scenes from 18 titles As you can see, there is a lot of material here and there is also a wide variety. There’s a good mix of American and Euro models and directors, and for those who like transsexuals there are a lot of scenes courtesy of Joey Silvera. I’ve never watched any of Silvera’s TS movies, but I was a huge fan of his when he did straight porn so I can imagine his standards haven’t changed. I also found that the Buttman site had access to a fair number of ‘classics’ from the 90s, which were great to see and be able to download. I know a lot of this stuff won’t appeal to everyone, but while I don’t download she-male material, for example, there was so much else here that I didn’t feel that detracted from the value. I’d recommend this site if you’re looking to add some unique Evil Angel material to your collection. 10-05-11  03:59am Replies (10) Review 162 Milk Enema (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Some amazing, innovative porn - Top models - Many different fetishes and niches - Access to a lot of the Evil Angel catalogue - Many options for downloads - HD available - Streaming available Cons: - Short link time-outs make download managers almost useless - Isn’t really a true network - No main page for the ‘network’ Bottom Line: My latest membership here has caused me to rethink some of my earlier enthusiasm for the site. (But just slightly…) First off, while this site is one of 20 in a network I think it is misleading to call this site a true network since the DVDs and scenes are all drawn from the same source and simply distributed in a logical way among the 20 sites. (The 20 sites are listed here: https://www.thebestporn.com/review_inclu...ed.html?id=milkenema) This isn’t a negative since the material is excellent porn (among the best available, in my opinion), and I admit that in most cases the material is arranged in logical ways: having all the Mike Adriano DVDs on one ‘site’ for example. Speaking of the porn on offer here, while what is offered here isn’t for everyone, if anal-themed porn with a harder edge is your thing, then this ‘network’ is among the best sites on the ‘net. The scenes have a good mix of fetishes and use top models from the U.S., Europe and Russia but they all share high production values. I look for three factors to be in place for a site to be excellent. The first is that the porn has to be excellent quality and in this case the ‘network’ gets top marks. Where this group of sites come up short is in my second and third criteria, namely site organization and ease of access. They don’t fail here, but they could do so much better. Regarding the site organization, I think the fact that they’ve decided to offer this as a collection of ‘sites’ is their waekness. There really is no reason to have organized the site this way. Since the sites all have material from the Evil Angel catalogue I don’t see why the site owners saw the need to parcel it out in the way they have. Unlike a true network, this collection of sites has no main page where a member can quickly see updates. To get access to updates you need to go to each of the 20 sites to see what’s new. But by doing so you’ll also see that several of the sites no longer add material. In those cases I suspect that the ‘site’ has run out of that specific theme in the Evil Angel catalogue. There’s no shame in that, and it certainly wouldn’t be as noticeable if this were just lumped together as one site. (Speaking of updates, there are daily updates spread among the sites.) To make matters worse, there is some overlap between the ‘sites.’ You may find a scene or two from a specific DVD on one site and the remaining ones on another. On DVD sites I prefer to arrange the scenes in folders named for the DVD where they come from, and in some cases that is made more difficult here because while a majority of scenes are listed as being part of a DVD some aren’t. I really can’t even speculate as to why the site owners made this choice. That isn’t to say that the ‘sites’ are terribly organized, because they aren’t. You can easily sort by DVD title or by scene (with the caveat being that the ‘orphan’ scenes noted above won’t show up in any DVD search.) As for ease of access, this is my biggest issue with the site: while they allow download managers, the time-outs on the links are so short that using a manager won’t work. My guess is that the links time out at about 5 minutes – so if you’re downloading an HD file at 2GB it makes no sense to queue up another because by the time your first scene is downloaded the second link is dead. I’m not sure how the site is owned, but even though it shows as having separate ownership from the Evil Angel site they are both part of Fame Dollars. Whatever the link, to get the most from the Evil Angel catalogue you’ll need to join both sites. That isn’t too bad considering that both offer a TBP discount (though I was sad to read that the full trial is now gone.) Perhaps the biggest change for me since I last joined is that I now download mp4s rather than WMVs. This is a huge change since the ‘network’ has better choices for mp4s, including 720p and 1080p. The 720 come in at 720x480 at 2400kb/s and the 1080 are 1080x720 at 5000kb/s. Both play at 30fps. Subjectively these are as crisp as the best elsewhere. They really do look great. WMVs continue to be offered but not in HD. Streaming is also offered but I don’t use that so I can’t comment on it. While most of what I’ve written leans to the site’s shortcomings please don’t consider just these negative comments. Consider it this way: think of your favourite model. Do you like her less when you learn that when she eats broccoli her farts stink? Likely not (assuming that this isn’t a fetish of yours, of course…). Same here. This collection of ‘sites’ offers up some of the most interesting, most innovative, best produced porn with some of the hottest models ever to grace the industry and they offer it all at a great price. I highly recommend joining, and as in the past I will rejoin again and again and again. Now if you’ll excuse me I have to get back to smelling some farts… 12-28-12  08:02pm Replies (2) Review 163 Milk Enema (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Small but unique site - Part of a larger collection of unique sites - Access to some of Jay Sinn’s movies - Good download speeds - Supports download managers - Multiple video options - Updates weekly (with the addition of one scene) - $2.95 three day full access - Photos available (though this is primarily a video site) - Good mix of American and European models - Some b/g/g hardcore - Great site for the anal enthusiast Cons: - Very short time-outs using download managers - Small site - Not full access to the Jay Sinn catalogue - The ‘network’ updates daily, but this site only adds one scene per week - No zips on the photos - No wmv HD Bottom Line: I’ve been a member of this site several times since it started and I’ve reviewed this small Evil Angel ‘network’ before. If you’re interested in joining this site and are looking for more information on the whole collection of sites you might find my review of Mike Adriano useful. That review was done recently and everything there is still relevant. I rejoined this site because I saw the review at TBP and because of the excellent value available for the $2.95 for a three day full access membership. I really can’t stress enough how great a value that is for some very unique hardcore material. The caveat to the above statement is that you obviously have to have an interest in the material on offer here. If you don’t, the low price will mean nothing. And I know a lot of PU members won’t be interested in this site because I once got a fairly negative reaction when I mentioned having an interest in girl/girl milk enemas on a thread about fetishes. I can understand, however, that in a world where liking a woman’s feet is a ‘fetish’ that seeing women spray milk out of their asses onto the faces and bodies of other women is seen as a bit weird. (Okay… a LOT weird…) Currently there are 50 scenes on this site (that’s not including the other 19 sites in the network). Most of the scenes are from Jay Sinn’s series for Evil Angel titled Milk Nymphos though there are a few scenes from Sinn’s series Pretty Sloppy. (For fans of Jay Sinn’s work, there are more scenes, such as Anal Acrobats, available on the network.) The videos are available in both wmv and mp4 format. Wmv files are available in 240p and 480p. I downloaded only the 480p and those come in at 720x400 at 2100kb/s. Subjectively, they look great. Because most of the scenes are two to three time longer in duration than the average cookie-cutter porn scene, file sizes are quite large. That isn’t a negative, but you should be aware of it. Mp4 files are usually available in a much wider range of resolutions: 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. I have a subjective dislike of the mp4 player so I don’t usually download those. I do wish there was a wmv HD option, though my understanding is that compression ratios make this more of a bandwidth hog. Pictures appear to be screencaps, but since they aren’t available as zips I didn’t download any apart from one to test. It came in at a pretty high resolution: 1280x1920. One advantage to this site (and to much of the network) is that although the material isn’t mainstream there is still a good mix of American and European models. Most comparable sites seem to feature only European models, presumably because a lot of American models won’t do much fetish work. While most of the scenes are g/g there are a few g/g/g. There are also a few solo scenes and a handful that start g/g and eventually bring in a guy for some anal sex. And in case you don’t get this from the title, this whole site has an anal theme. While the b/g/g scenes feature anal sex, the others use a lot of toys and interesting objects. I’m no doctor, but I can’t imagine sticking a billiard ball up your friend’s bum is a good idea. But I’m glad these ladies try because it sure is fun to watch. If I had to complain about the site one complaint would be nitpicking, namely that I wish there was more Jay Sinn material available here. He’s a pretty innovative director who produces nothing like I’ve seen elsewhere. Sure, you could say that about Max Hardcore when he first started, but that would be comparing apples and oranges. You might not like the actual scenes, but they aren’t abusive. They feature fetish models who appear to be having fun doing what they’re doing. I once saw an interview with Allison Pierce who described her Milk Nympho scene. She didn’t understand it as a fetish, but was fine with doing it. Another negative that is more substantive is that while the site allows download managers the time-outs imposed make them pretty much useless. My educated guess is that links will time-out around the 15 minute mark. That’s pretty short when you consider that the 480p wmv scenes average 1GB in size. You certainly can’t queue up a bunch of scenes and walk away. A final concern, though more about the network than this site in particular, is that some of the sites don’t appear to be updating any longer. I’d definitely recommend that anyone with an anal fetish give this site a try. Not only is it unique, but it is very well done too. If this is your first visit to the network you may want to consider the full membership because with the time-out issue getting all the material you want in three days might be impossible. But for regularly popping in to check for new scenes the low price on the trial makes this a site to return to regularly. 11-23-11  09:30am Replies (4) Review 164 Mixed X (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - New site with some incredibly hot scenes - Class-leading production values - Good acting - Updates with two new scenes per week - Reputable biller - Seven day trial (I didn’t use this so I can’t confirm whether it includes downloads) - Low price if you join through TBP/PU (though it isn’t listed as a discount) - Brief biographies and photos for every model Cons: - Small site (currently 40 videos) - Not part of a network - Download speeds and streaming slower than I have experienced elsewhere - Pre-checked cross-sales on joining Bottom Line: Mixed X is a new porn site started by the Hungarian model Cristina Shine in late 2020. In its short tenure it site has attracted a lot of attention and has received two AVN nominations (studio and scene). It’s also been nominated by XCritic for Best New Studio. These nominations are from peers so they carry a lot of weight. Does this new studio/site merit that kind of attention? In my opinion, it does. Everything that Cristina Shine brings to bear here is industry leading. The site describes itself as featuring the art of cinematic handheld porn but that doesn’t really do it justice. I think anyone who has collected porn for more than a couple of years might be sceptical about handheld scenes. We’ve all been burned by that. But here, the camerawork is impeccable, bordering on being cinematography. The scenes themselves are built around a thin plot. For example, in one scene Cristina Shine is playing the assistant to a demanding boss. There is a sexual tension built up that makes the scene amazing. There are currently 40 scenes available on the site but with two new scenes being added every week it won’t take long for the site to grow. And keep in mind that these scenes aren’t simply thrown-together gonzo scenes. While a small site can hardly be said to have a broad mix of scenes, it’s fair to say that this site is certainly aiming in that direction. Many of the scenes have anal sex and there are several lesbian scenes as well. It’s also fair to say that this site can be categorized as an interracial site because many of the male talent are Black. It’s also fair to say that this site can be categorized as being suitable for couples. I suspect that many women would appreciate this story and the acting. One thing that makes this site stand apart is that the acting is actually very good. Cristina Shine herself is a good actor and it certainly seems like she has recruited co-stars who are as well. While my own tastes tend to run to gonzo, I do appreciate porn that sets high standards for itself and meets them. If you are going to have acting in your porn then it might as well be good acting. Speaking of acting, the scenes have a lot of chemistry between the actors. I know that it is trite to say this because any porn actor is going to try to give the sense of chemistry, but here it really is an overriding attribute for the scenes. The site isn’t an exclusive vehicle for Cristina Shine. Other top Eastern European models have scenes here as well and they are also excellent. Amirah Adara, Nesty and Cherry Kiss are here. One advantage to having the model roster that they have is that many of these women speak English. Even for those models whose English skills aren’t great, just having dialogue is a big factor in both production values and heat. I don’t collect a lot of porn with Eastern European models so many of the women here are unknown to me though they are all beautiful. The site itself is easy to use and has a good tag system. You have three choices for both downloads and streaming: 1080p, 8000kb/s and 30 fps, HD 720p and 480p. This is certainly not a deal-breaker and I’m not even going to count it as a negative, but it is a pet peeve of mine to have videos start to play automatically when the page loads. For one thing, you need to be cautious in case your speakers are turned up, and for another it will use bandwidth until you turn it off. Photos are also available. Those are available as singles or zips and come in at 2160 x 3840 resolution. Screencaps are also available but they are very low resolution so I wouldn’t count on those as a deciding factor in joining the site. I found download speeds to be somewhat lower than I would expect to see on a site of this calibre. It may be, however, that the site is new and popular or that the server needs an upgrade. This is not a deal-breaker, however. This site is not part of any network and there is no bonus material offered. You get only what you pay for. There are some discounts offered for members and these may have value for subscribers. There is a pre-checked cross-sell when joining so be careful. The site does bill through Segpay who are, in my experience, reputable and safe billers. There is no TBP/PU discount listed but when I joined I was offered a 50% discount. I just checked before posting this and that offer is still active. The bottom line is that while this site is new and still relatively small what it has going for it is that it is growing quickly and it offers porn on a level not seen on many other sites. If your preference is for plot-based porn with good acting skills and high production values, then you owe it to yourself to check this out. There is a reason why it’s garnered so many award nominations. 02-08-21  01:03pm Replies (0) Review 165 Mormon Girlz (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Unique porn concept - Site works hard to play up the fantasy - Good mix of models and scene types - 4 resolutions available for download - Streaming available - Some photos available - Supports download managers (with some limitations) - Bills through CC Bill Cons: - Site has some flaws - Navigation is difficult - Models aren't identified (see comments below) - Streams at low resolution only - Occasional delays in downloads Bottom Line: This site needs some explanation because it isn't like anything else I’ve seen and it really doesn’t lend itself well to any categories. It’s fair to say that the sex itself is fairly standard; this isn't a fetish site in the true sense. The porn is what you’d get in any mainstream site: boy/girl, girl/girl, 18-22, MILF and groups. What makes the site unique is the setup for the scenes and how much effort the site puts into making that setup seem real. The site is, as the name makes clear, about Mormons. Sure, there are sites that play up a conceit and allow the viewer to imagine that the scene is what it says it is. A good example is the recent use of incest in porn. But unless you’ve just arrived on this planet you know that the actors are just acting – they aren't really related. To further illustrate my point, you’d have to believe, for example, that Megan Rain and Brandon Iron are related in real life when any avid porn collector knows they are professional porn stars. But Mormon Girlz does things differently. The scenes attempt to make things seem much more realistic, with the locations, clothes and even setup being realistic. One thing that makes it easier for the site to do this is that given the secrecy of the Mormon Church to outsiders any of this could be true. How do I know that they don’t have these sexually charged anointings of women when they hit 18 or 19? The use of traditional Mormon undergarments is a way that the site blurs the line between fantasy and reality too. For those of us with little or no knowledge of the inner workings of the Church all of this could be real. (The rituals, not the scenes.) Another way that the site helps create the feeling that these scenes could be real is by the use of just-off-mainstream stars. Don’t get me wrong – the site has beautiful women but they aren't the big stars of the day. Using the biggest stars like Jillian Janson or Jada Stevens would make it immediately clear that this is all fantasy. So to help maintain that they have models who for whatever reason haven’t wanted to be big stars. The site has models such as Lily Cade, Bethany Skye, Gwen Stark and Cadence Lux. These are all stunning porn stars but to the average viewer who steals more porn than he buys they may be unknowns. To keep the fantasy going, the models are listed by names different from their stage names. So, for example, Cadence Lux is called “Sister Kara” on the site. The site doesn’t have the models perform just one scene. All of the models have a series of scenes with various rituals and those usually include b/g and g/g. It seems that a group of models will be signed on to do multiple scenes and then after those scenes are done a new group is signed up. So what are the scenes like? This is subjective, but given the setup, which usually has some power imbalance within a ritual, I think they are hot bordering on incendiary. The site itself is what you’d expect in any porn site. The videos are available for streaming or download. The streaming is only in one resolution and it seems much lower than you’d expect. Downloads are available in four resolutions: 640x360 (600kb/s), 960x540 (1300kb/s), 1280x720 (2200kb/s) and 1920x1080 (5000kb/s). All scenes are 23fps. I downloaded the 1080p scenes and they look good. Not great, but good. There are currently 135 scenes available and the site updates with the addition of one new scene per week. The site has some annoying flaws in how it’s laid out. For one thing, selecting the video tab and then trying to advance through the pages shows those links don’t work. If you go to the “Girls” tab, though, there is a separate tab at the top of the page that allows you to access all updates. But you have to click “more” many times to get to the earliest scenes. This isn't a deal-breaker, but it’s annoying. The site supports download managers but only seems to allow a limited number of scenes (8 or so) to be queued up at one time. I also noticed on several occasions that rather than the download starting I got a message that the download was waiting for an available socket. I’m not sure what that means, but I’m guessing that since this is a small site in a rare niche that they can’t handle a large amount of traffic at once. This is a personal preference and I understand that the site tries to maintain the fantasy that this is real, but as a collector who catalogues my collection by models I would like to know the stage names of all the models. The bottom line is that the pros of the site far outweigh the cons. The pros are a unique site with some hot porn featuring a variety of models. The scenes go beyond what you’d expect to create the air of reality and they seem so real as to be a bit creepy – in the sexy sense. The cons are minor and could be easily fixed. I highly recommend giving the site some serious consideration. 10-27-16  04:45pm Replies (0) Review 166 My Public Dreams (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A relatively large site in an under-served niche - 56 videos - 80 photo sets - Zips available - Updates weekly Cons: - Sloooow download speeds - Doesn’t support download managers - Not particularly titillating or erotic - Poor camera work - Photos are low resolution Bottom Line: I think most members here would agree with me that for a site to be good it has to have more than just decent porn. The site needs to be easy to navigate and the material needs to be reasonably accessible. That latter part is where My Public Dream fails. In 2012 having download speeds that top out at 300kb/s doesn’t cut it, especially when the site offers some files that are getting close to 1GB in size. The site’s premise is simple: take attractive Eastern European models and get them naked in public. Most of the scenes appear* to add some boy/girl hardcore to the mix. I’m a big fan of this genre and one constant issue with it is that if it isn’t done right then all the heat and titillation can get lost. Unfortunately this site seems to* make this mistake. I think European public nudity sites tend to lose some heat and titillation simply because public nudity isn’t the huge taboo that it is in North America. The problem is that the public nudity can just seem common and normal. The best public nudity scenes (in my opinion) show the model as being nervous and excited at the same time while being nude in public. (As an aside, I noticed that one American NIP site, Nude in L.A. appears to be gone, at least temporarily.) My Public Dreams falls into the trap of making public nudity seem like an everyday occurrence. It might seem hard to do, but a lot of NIP (Nude in Public) sites can take an attractive and nude model and make that unerotic. The site design is also pretty simple and basic. That’s not a bad thing though. There are tabs for updates, videos and photo sets. Once on those respective pages there is a single column of scenes that can be downloaded. For the videos, clicking the download link opens another page with the download or streaming options, while you can open the photo set for single pictures or download a zip right from the main photo page. There is no discernable search function, but it really isn’t needed either. As of this writing there are 56 videos and 80 photo sets available. The site seems to update weekly with one photo set OR one video being added each week. The site is modern in that they do offer multiple ways to see the videos. On the scene page there is the option to stream it there and there are download links below that. The videos are available in WMV format (codec 8) at 1280x720, 720x400 and 480x272. Mpeg files are available at 384x240. There are resolutions available for mobile devices too. I give full marks to this small site for offering HD, but keep in mind that they don’t offer any reasonable access to that material. The download speeds are so slow that it is practically impossible to download the HD material unless you’re very, very patient. I only downloaded the 720x400 size (which still took 15+ minutes to download a 300MB file). The reported size is what you get, but subjectively they don’t look great. I noticed some pixilation. I can’t speak for the other formats or sizes, but the 720x400 plays at 25fps. Adding to the grief of slow download speeds is that the site doesn’t seem to allow download managers. I normally use Free Download Manager to queue up scenes to be downloaded one at a time, but I couldn’t use that. I had to download within my browser, which made the download speeds even slower. One problem with the few scenes that I did download and watch is that the camera work is poor. Like a lot of NIP sites they have to rely on a handheld camera. The camera movement is at best distracting and at worse nausea inducing. The last thing I need is for my brain to start associating naked women with the need to barf. Photos are also available, as singles or as zips. The resolution is low though, at only 800x444. I’m not a huge photo collector, but when I collect photos I want them to be better quality than this. For fans of the NIP niche, it can be hard to find new material so you may be tempted to join this site. There may be some excellent material here, but I didn’t find it. The slow download speeds are this site’s Achilles Heel and until that gets fixed I wouldn’t recommend a membership here. * My apologies to anyone relying on this review to make a decision as to whether or not to buy a membership. Normally I spend a lot of time with a site and the material on it and can make definitive statements. I have to confess that I can’t do that here. I found the slow download speeds so annoying that I didn’t download a lot. I cancelled my membership pretty quickly and left disappointed. 02-26-12  09:01am Replies (2) Review 167 My Very First Time (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Some fresh models early in their careers - Lots of download and streaming options - Good production values - TBP Discount Cons: - Small site - Updates are very slow to arrive - Site will remain small unless the update schedule is increased - Download speeds varied - Would be better off as part of a network Bottom Line: When I saw this site listed as a new site on TBP I signed up. I’m a big fan of collecting ‘firsts,’ and especially collecting first anals. I knew this would be a small site since it was just starting out but I had high hopes that it would develop into a great site for this rare niche. And the fact that the site is affiliated with Porn Pros gave me some comfort too. I went into the membership with my eyes open and the scenes are good but unless one fatal flaw is fixed this site isn't worth the membership right now. There are currently only nine scenes uploaded. For a new site in a narrow niche that’s to be expected though. The problem specific to this site is that it appears that they only add one new scene per month. When the site started they added one new scene every three days and then they went a month before a new scene was added. Unless they pick up the pace this site will be a low value for a while. The scenes themselves are well done. All of the models are typical porn cupcakes in that they are young (18-20), petite and natural. Several of the models will be added to my list of favorites and I hope to see a lot more of them in the future. Of the nine scenes one is billed as the model’s first scene ever, one is the model’s first interracial scene, two are each model’s first (vaginal only) gang bang and five are the model’s first anal scenes. The videos are available in streaming or as a download. Streaming is available in two resolutions. Downloads are available as MP4s in 1080p, 720p and 480p, as a 480p MPG1 and as a 720p WMV. I downloaded the 720p MP4s and those come in at 1280x720 and 2,600 kb/s. While the bitrate is low there is no pixilation at all and the video looks sharp. Photos are available too – as singles or as a zip. The zipped photos are 1500x1000. The site allows download managers and I didn’t have any issue using one. Download speeds varied from average to poor – I often saw download speeds drop below 1MB/s. (The site seems to be affiliated with Porn Pros and I have that same issue there too.) So would I recommend the site? Probably not, unless you really need to have one or more of the scenes. Even with the TBP discount this site isn't a good value and unless they start updating more often it’ll be a long time before it is a good value. This is an under-served niche and the site could be a great stand-alone site if it was updating more frequently. As it is now, however, the site would be far a better option as part of a larger network. 05-10-15  11:56am Replies (1) Review 168 My XXX Pass (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site broken down into smaller sites - Lots of excellent quality HD - Affiliated with Gamma Entertainment - Supports download managers - Timeouts occur only after about two hours - Many well-known stars - High production values - Videos offered in multiple formats and wide array of resolutions - Streaming is available - Streaming doesn’t begin as soon as you load the scene page Cons: - No gradual transition from SD to HD - Need to take note of billing for cancellation purposes - A few navigation issues Bottom Line: My XXX Pass might try to act like a network, but it really isn’t. That’s not a bad thing though. It claims (and has) several ‘sites’ but all of that material is made available on this main site, so if all you visit is My XXX Pass then you’ll have had access to everything. There is no disadvantage to doing things this way (though some may say it is an attempt to make the site seem bigger than it is) and the advantage is it offers a quick way to sort by general theme. I’m not into MILF blowjobs, for example, so I can just avoid visiting the ‘site’ that caters to that niche. The ‘network’ contains almost 2500 scenes and these can be sorted by the various sites. The sites are: 1000 Facials, Immoral Live, Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs and Throated. Most of what I write here applies to all the sites, though I do plan on writing a separate review of Immoral Live due to some unique offerings there. As you can tell from the list, the sites are mostly oral-themed. For those wondering (because I did) the scenes on Throated aren’t brutal like many other sites with similar names, and 1000 Facials isn’t a bukkake site (like I hoped it might be). There are some multi-shot scenes but they’re mostly one girl, one guy. (And also in case you’re wondering, there is very little anal on the network. There are 150 scenes listed as having anal but fewer than 10 are available in HD.) The ‘network’ updates regularly with at least one and as many as three scenes being added per day. These are spread across all the sites so don’t take this to mean that you’ll get a new scene added to any of the individual sites each day. In the most recent uploads there are a lot of options available. WMV downloads are offered in resolutions of 160, 240 and 360. Mp4s are offered in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Streaming is available as 160, 240, 360, 480 and 540 and mobile users can download in 160, 240, 360, 48, 540 and 720. I downloaded the 1080p and those came in at 1920x1080, 6300 kb/s and 29fps. Average files sizes vary, but since most of the content is only oral they’re short and come in around 1GB. The scenes look great: they’re crisp and sharp and demonstrate some high production values. In less recent uploads, some of the options are narrowed, but the full 1080p is still there. When it comes to file resolutions, there is one point worth noting. The oldest scenes on the site date to 2005 so we can’t expect full HD in those, but the resolutions are quite low with only 160 and 360p being offered in both WMV and mp4. The other issue worth noting is that there wasn’t a gradual increase in resolutions where they added 540p and then a year later added 720p. It just appears that on a certain date (in summer 2009) they flipped a switch and started uploading HD video. There is a blend of HD and SD for a while, but it is disappointing to click on a scene uploaded in late 2009 to find that it is only offered in low res. I don’t want to leave a prospective member with the wrong impression though – this still means you get access to almost 1400 videos with full 1080p available. That’s a great value no matter how you look at it. I experienced a few minor navigations issues. Each page has 15 large thumbnails and the intention is that you can hover your mouse over those and see a brief slideshow of other thumbnails from the scene. It does work, but first a large box with the scene name will appear for a few seconds obscuring the thumbnails. The second issue that may just be an issue with Windows 8 is that hovering over a thumbnail causes it to go blank for a few seconds. I found that I had to wait for the thumb to come back and then wait for the box to disappear before I could see the thumbnails. The site gets the technical bits right: it is well laid out, easy to use, supports download managers (with reasonable timeouts of at least two hours) and has good download speeds. The scenes themselves are well done with good lighting and editing. The staff and male talent don’t fall into the trap of thinking that the scenes are about anything other than the female models. One caveat with any site managed through Gamma Entertainment, as this is: they’re a reputable company but pay attention to where you’re being billed from. They don’t use common billers and they seem to have a bunch of proprietary billing companies. Take note of the billing site name as that will be necessary when you want to cancel. The bottom line is that this ‘network’ has some great porn and they make it easily accessible. The production values are high and the HD videos look great. The content is mostly oral so if that’s something you like you can’t go wrong with a membership here. 09-07-13  07:01am Replies (18) Review 169 Mylf (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Team Skeet family of sites (but not included with a TS membership) - 260+ scenes - 3-4 scenes added per week - Wide range of scenes - Pictures and screencaps available - TBP discount Cons: - File size is listed with resolution so you’ll know how big it is before you start - Scenes can be broken down into different ‘sites’ but these seem to all have similar content - Slower download speeds than average - Lots of ads for other sites in the Team Skeet family Bottom Line: When life hands you a lemon, make lemonade. As any reader of my reviews over the past 12 years would know, a MILF site isn’t something that I’d normally join. I missed a pre-checked cross-sell recently and ended up with a full-price membership to MYLF.com. I figured that challenging it would be futile since they have a proprietary biller so I just opted to be more careful in the future. The fact that it hasn’t been reviewed here yet allows me to at least let others know what the site is like. MYLF is part of the Team Skeet family of sites so anyone familiar with that broad range of sites will also be familiar with the layout of this site. It’s logically laid out and easy to sort through the models and scenes, but like other Team Skeet sites there are a lot of ads to bypass as well. TBP notes that there are three sites included with a membership, but in a sense it is probably more than that now. The problem with this is that while there is certainly access to several ‘sites’ there isn’t anything to differentiate the scenes on each. None of these sites has anything specific or different to offer such as anal, lesbian, etc. Further, by just using the main MYLF site you get access to everything included in your membership. (When you’re searching by scene you can limit the search to only the content that is available to you. If you search by model you get everything including scenes on the sites you don’t have access to.) There are a wide range of scenes: older woman/younger guy, older woman/younger woman, MILF/like-aged guy with a few solo scenes thrown in. The scenes all have some plot to them with the age-play scenes having the usual scenarios of stepson/daughter and stepmother. There is nothing particularly innovative. While I don’t follow any MILF models I do recognize many of them as they started as teens and progressed to MILF as their careers progressed. Many of them are names I recognize so it’s reasonable to say that many of them are A-list models. The site’s definition of MILF is quite broad with some MILFs being in their early 30s while others are in their late 40s. (This is more a comment than anything, but for some reason the industry associates MILF with large breasts – real or fake. I don’t get that.) The site currently has 261 scenes. It also appears to add up to five scenes per week which is pretty impressive. All of the scenes are available to stream (in one resolution) and to download in five resolutions. Those are: 360p (1400kb/s), 480p (1800), 576p (2600), 720p (6000) and 1080p (12000). Each scene also offers photos and screenshots as singles or as zips. I experienced download speeds that were approximately 50% of what I normally see with sites like this. Admittedly, I didn’t download over a period of weeks as I would with a deliberate membership so it is possible the few times I went to download a scene or two by coincidence I did that at a busy time on the network. But it’s also possible that the site just has a slower server. (I haven’t had a membership to a Team Skeet site in a few months so they may have slowed download speeds across the network.) TBP lists the billers as Segpay and Epoch but I was charged through a proprietary biller called MILFHelp. They do have an automated cancelling ability and it appears to work. I should also note that cross-sell membership that I accidentally signed up for was turned into a full month membership partly because I received no confirmation email. That may be different with the other billers or if you purposely sign up. The bottom line for me is that while this isn’t porn I’d normally buy a membership to, nor is it a site that I joined voluntarily, I can recognize a good site when I see one. They offer a wide range of professionally-shot scenes with some hot MILF models on a site that is logically laid out. The site is large and is growing at an above-average rate. If you add in the TBP discount price for a monthly membership this becomes a great value. I recommend checking it out if this is porn you like. Now if you’ll excuse me I’m going back to some teen sites… 07-18-19  03:47pm Replies (10) Review 170 Naked Gym Girls (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 9 videos, 7 picture sets - Unique niche - $20 membership - Videos in three resolutions - Photos in zips or singles - Photos in two resolutions - High-res photos look amazing - Supports download managers for queuing files - Definitely all exclusive Cons: - Small site - No obvious update schedule - Music replaces sound - Would be much better value packaged as part of a network Bottom Line: Leave it to the folks at The Best Porn to expose me to a niche I neither knew existed or liked it: girls getting naked while working out. There is really only one reason why I joined, and that’s to get access to a scene by a model I like who has only done a small amount of stuff. The fact that the site isn’t terribly expensive at $20 and billed through CC Bill sealed the deal. The site is very small, with only nine videos and seven photo sets offered. While that’s definitely small, you need to keep in mind that many of the scenes are well over an hour long and one falls just short of two hours. The site has a very narrow (and unique) focus: girls at a gym, solo, who begin a workout, strip off their clothes while working out and complete the workout while naked. There is little variation: there is one scene with two girls with some sex, and one scene is shot outdoors, but other than that it follows the same formula. Consider this more a nudist site than a sex site. The scenes are undated so I can’t determine what update schedule, if any, exists. The site allows member comments on the scenes and the most recent scene has comments. Yesterday when I checked the comments the most recent said it was posted three months ago. Today it says it was posted on December 2, but doesn’t give a year. I think it is safe to assume that if the site is updating there is no set schedule beyond glacial. The site offers videos in three resolutions: 1920x1080 (9000 kb/s), 1080x720 and 640x360. While I found most of the video to be crisp and clear, I did find in some of the videos that where there is fast movement the edges become slightly pixilated. I don’t understand the tech side of this so I don’t know if this is something the site could even avoid. A unique feature is that you can download an ISO version that can be burned to a DVD to watch on TV. The site permits download managers for queuing scenes and zips. The photos are available as singles or zips and in two resolutions: 3744x5616 and 1200x800. The high-res pics look incredibly good. If you’re a photo collector these might be worth joining to get. Photo sets range from 100+ photos to 800+ photos. My biggest complaint about the scenes may be subjective, but I suspect that many others will agree with me. I’ll let any potential members decide on their own. The site has chosen to overdub the sounds of the workout with music. This isn’t that there is music playing over top of the sounds; the sounds are gone and completely replaced by music. To make matters worse, in my opinion, is that the music is that techno-shit that seems to be overplayed in gyms. You might be able to convince me that this crappy music belongs in a gym (but don’t bet on it) but you’ll never convince me that it belongs in a porn video. Even a solo video where the intention may be to create a sort of gym atmosphere. I’d rather hear the interaction with the crew than the music. This site is one of ten that was added to TBP recently from a company called David Weisenbarger (David Nudes, HD Studio Nudes and more). I do not have memberships at any other of these sites but it appears that they are all relatively small (though some are fairly big), that they feature mostly solo models with rare g/g sex. My role in the porn biz is as a customer, and as a customer I am unlikely to join any of their other sites simply because they aren’t a good value at $20 to $25 per site. (And keep in mind that production costs here are at the low end of the spectrum: no expensive locations, solo nude, no sex, no masturbation.) All the sites added together would make a fair-sized network and by charging a fair price they’d probably generate exponentially more business. This has nothing to do with the review, and I’m obviously only speculating. The bottom line? the site is small, but it is relatively inexpensive at $20. It bills through CC Bill so you can join in confidence. If this is a niche you like or there is a model here that you want to see then you may be willing to spend the $20 to join. For everyone else, the site is too small with no predictable growth to make this a good choice. As it stands now, and with no obvious changes coming, this site isn’t a good value. If this site ever becomes part of a network or package deal I’d reconsider my opinion. 02-18-14  03:55pm Replies (2) Review 171 Naughty America (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Even though the network promotes itself as featuring more mature and more buxom models, there is still a lot here for those of us who like younger and more petite models - Huge network of 27 sites - Over 5000 scenes - Exclusive (appears to be) - Newer uploads (2009 onward) offer a wide range of file types and resolutions - HD available - Many sites updating regularly - Bills through Epoch - Allows download managers Cons: - Site has a lot of ads that can slow things down - Have to enter your username and password each time - More dead links than I’d expect on a network like this - Older scenes are low resolution - Some sites no longer updating - Proportionally fewer anal scenes than similar networks (that’s obviously very subjective and isn’t factored into the score) Bottom Line: Like a lot of PU members probably did too, I joined this network to take advantage of the great price they were offering to commemorate uploading their 5000th scene. I had never considered joining before because much of the preview material made it clear that the site was more about buxom MILFs than the 18-22 petite stars I prefer. But with a $5 fee it was worth the risk. I know that this will be the 50th review posted here so to make this of some use to PU members who share my tastes I’ll review it from the perspective of someone preferring younger and more petite models. The network has 27 sites up and while I realize that some readers may dispute my classification of sites, the majority of sites cater to members looking for older and more buxom models. I knew that going in and I’m not critical of that. I also won’t let that impact this review or the score. There are some sites that focus on the young and petite. These are: • Fast Times – 148 scenes, updating with two scenes added per month • My Sister’s Hot Friend – 481 scenes, updating with up to eight scenes added per month • Naughty Bookworms – 430 scenes, updating with up to eight scenes added per month • Naughty Athletics – 137 scenes, hasn’t updated since August 2012 • I Have a Wife – 246 scenes, updating with up to four scenes added per month • SoCal Coeds – 40 scenes, hasn’t updated since 2007 • My Dad’s Hot Girlfriend – 162 scenes, updating with up to four scenes added per month • My Friend’s Hot Girl – 41 scenes, updating with up to three scenes added per month • Naughty Country Girls – 22 scenes, hasn’t updated since 2009 • Naughty Rich Girls – 39 scenes, last update was January 2012 The network offers a wide variety of file types and resolutions on their newer scenes. There is really something for everyone. Mp4s are available in 1080p, 720p and 480p, WMVs are available in ‘DVD’ and ‘Normal’ and there is a Quicktime version and one for mobile devices. On all but the HD files they are also available in parts. I didn’t download all the various versions to test them, but what I did download is what it is advertised to be. The one problem with resolutions is that while they certainly offer state-of-the-art downloads now they didn’t always do that. On many older scenes the best offered is 512k which looks pretty bad. When these were being offered I’m fairly sure that they were not up to par with the best in the industry. Streaming and photos are also available but I sampled neither so I can’t comment on those. With the exception noted below, the network supports download managers and the links don’t appear to time-out quickly. The site definitely has some flaws, and I realize that some of these may seem trivial but they add up to reduce the usefulness of the network. Not in any order, the flaws I found are: • The network has no option to remember your username and password. • If you’re on an individual site and click to open a scene, hitting your browser’s back button will kick you all the way back to page one, even if you were on page 30. Either remember where you were or use tabs. (This may not be a problem for people who don’t use IE.) • Earlier in my membership I couldn’t use Internet Download Manager to download either of the two highest resolution files. That may be fixed now but I don’t know if it is. • There are a lot more dead links on this network then I’ve seen with competitors. One major flaw on the network is that it is extremely ‘busy’ with ads and feeds. Ordinarily I can overlook ads (they do work on me sometimes) because I realize it can be a decent revenue stream for exclusive networks like this but in this case they cross the line to be obtrusive. To even get into the network you have to click through two ads. Once in, the pages have a lot of ads. They’re obtrusive because they require a lot of time to download. I have a fiber op connection and on many occasions I had to wait for what seemed like a minute for the ads to load before I could navigate on the page. I realize that this is purely subjective and many readers may not care or may see this as a plus, but for a network of this size they don’t have a lot of anal sex scenes. There were many models who are known for their anal performances who don’t do anal here. This is a subjective con, but for others it may be a plus. I’m just making the statement so that readers will know this. So was this membership worth the heavily discounted price? Absolutely. Is it worth the usually-discounted price offered through TBP/PU? Definitely yes. Even for a guy who isn’t among the target customer group there was plenty of great porn with young and petite models to make this a worthwhile investment. I’d recommend that anyone who shares my interest in a particular type of model take the plunge regardless of the fact that the stuff we like is in the minority. There is still a lot of great stuff for us too. 11-05-12  05:47pm Replies (15) Review 172 Naughty Midwest Girls XXX (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Rare site in an underserved niche (US-based old/young) - Has some beautiful models - 140+ scenes - Mostly boy/girl but does have some girl/girl - Offers both photos and videos - Reasonable price for the site - Updates Cons: - Production values are relatively low - Wide discrepancy in the cameras used - Updates on a bi-weekly schedule Bottom Line: I found this to be a tough review to write because while I really like the porn that this site has to offer the site itself and the production values leave a lot to be desired. This really is a case of overlooking some flaws to get access to a niche I really like, but I’m sure we’ve all done that before. I don’t know how I missed this site for all of these years but I’m glad I stumbled on it. Given the title I presumed it was one of the many sites that feature solo masturbation scenes or things like wet T-shirt contests. Nothing in the title indicated to me that the site offered old/young porn. I’m sure if you are a regular porn subscriber you have also run across numerous sites like this that have an amateur feel to them. Everything about it seems amateur from the production values to the website layout. Sites like these lack the polish of the large studio-based sites. That isn’t a bad thing. My experience is that when I find an under-served niche that I like run by an amateur the sites often have some of the hottest material because the people making it share the interest as well. That seems to be the case here too. The site does have a lot going for it in that it offers porn in the rare niche of US-based old/young porn. Most of the models here seem to be relatively unknown and most are very attractive. The male talent in most of the scenes seems to be the guy who owns the site and he is a pudgy guy who has to be in his late 50s or early 60s. Call me twisted, but something about that scenario adds a lot of heat to a scene for me. While there is a mixture of kinds of scenes on the site most of them are boy/girl hard-core. There are some solo scenes. There are also several girl/girl scenes but most of those turn into boy/girl/girl after some lesbian action. Many sites featuring old/young porn seem to go in for the stepdaughter theme and I realize that creeps some people out. That theme is used here but the more common theme is that of a babysitter. Most of the scenes are shot using a combination of POV and tripod-mounted cameras. This method is never going to give the best scenes but they can work. A significant problem that this site suffers from is that one of the cameras used (usually for POV stuff) is very low resolution. It is low enough that it detracts from the overall scene. There are currently over 140 scenes on the site. The site is updating and it shouldn’t be a surprise that the updates only happen approximately once every two weeks. The videos are available in WMV and MP4 formats but each of those only comes in one resolution and those aren't great. The WMVs are 720x480, 1600 kb/s and 30fps. The MP4s are a bit better at 1280x720, 4000 kb/s and 30fps. One minor flaw is that the MP4 files are listed as being for the iPad so I wrongly assumed that they’d be lower resolution than the WMV files. But the thing is that SOME of them are lower resolution and some aren't. I can accept that older files are lower resolution but it would be useful to list the resolution on the file so the viewer could choose not only between the file type but the resolution as well. Photos are available as singles or zips. Those aren't high-resolution either at 1280x960. Initially I wasn’t able to use my download manager but I think now that may have been an isolated issue or a problem with my software because the site now allows me to use one. This won’t be an issue for many readers, but I was a bit disappointed to not find many anal scenes at all. There are three or four and these aren't the best filmed scenes on the site. The price for a monthly membership is pretty good and goes a long way to making up for some of the site’s shortcomings. There isn't a TBP discount but the regular monthly price is just over $20. The bottom line for me is that this site is both easy to recommend and easy to reject – and that all depends on whether you like this niche. The site has some serious flaws: the production values aren't great and the site has an overall amateur feel to it. It lacks the quality of a bigger, better funded site. But if you like this niche those flaws can either be overlooked or they can add to the allure of the scene. So if you like this niche the site gets a strong recommendation and if you don’t like this niche you should probably spend your porn budget elsewhere. 09-12-16  03:25pm Replies (2) Review 173 New Sensations Network (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Great studio site - Some under-served niches - Top-tier models - Large site - No streaming or download restrictions - Supports download managers - Bills through Epoch Cons: - Not a true network (not really a con) - Updates slowly - No TBP/PU discount Bottom Line: Most of what I had written in my previous review from six years ago remains true but there are some significant differences that warrant some updated comments. One comment I made last time that bears repeating is that this isn’t a true network. It really is simply a large porn site and the individual “sitesâ€� are really better thought of as just specific tags. This is not intended as a negative comment though. This is a site I join occasionally but not as frequently as with other sites such as Evil Angel, for example. The reason I don’t join this site as often as other studio sites is that the updates are less frequent. My advice to anyone considering a recurring membership is to look at the frequency of updates first. There are two major changes to the site since the last time I reviewed it. The first is that it has had a bit of a refresh in some of the sub-sites. The main site has not had a major refresh but that isn’t a negative either because the site is generally well laid out and logical to use. The second major change, and I admit this is more subjective, is that New Sensations has really moved into serving several specific niches. When I last reviewed the site I commented on the fact that NS had been creating some incest-themed porn. They have continued this and it’s fair to say that it has become a staple on this site. If you have an interest in any kind of “stepâ€� porn this is really a site you ought to consider joining. Whether it is step-parents having sex with step-children or step-siblings having sex you will find a lot of it here. All of the scenes involving “stepâ€� porn start with a disclaimer making it clear that these are just actors. None of the scenes that I watched (and I watched a lot) played on the fantasy of genuine incest porn. For example, there are no scenes where the female model plays the actual daughter of the male model. They are always “steps.â€� Another theme that takes centre stage here is wife porn. On many sites, wife porn is done as cuckold porn or some play on that. Here, there is very little cuckold porn though many of the scenes have the husband watching. The main difference is that most of the scenes focus on the female model and not on the “husbandâ€� being humiliated or degraded. I’m not a fan of cuckold porn so I still enjoy watching the scenes. It’s also worth noting that in many of these wife-themed scenes the female model is still relatively young. Just because it is wife porn doesn’t mean that it’s MILF porn as well. As I mentioned above, the sub-sites on the network acting as useful tags for sorting among the various niches. One in particular caught my attention simply because of my interest in that genre. While it is listed here as a separate site, Family XXX, is really just a way of sorting out incest-themed DVDs on the site. I found this particularly useful since so much of this genre relies on female models who have a specific look (young and petite) and often feature these models with older men such as Steve Holmes. If incest or old/young porn is something that interests you a NS subscription just to get access to Family XXX is probably worth considering. The site currently has close to 1500 DVDs available and most of these have four scenes per DVD. The site updates irregularly and adds one scene every 2 to 5 days. As I noted in my earlier review, and is to be expected, older scenes are offered in both fewer and lower resolutions. All newer scenes, however, are available in both streaming and downloads in a range of resolutions. Both streaming and downloads are available in 720p (3000 and 6000 kb/s), 1080p (9000 and 12,000 kb/s) and 4K (16,000 and 25,000 kb/s). I find it unusual that NS has completely dropped lower resolutions, though it seems reasonable that people who would watch on their phones would likely have sufficient data to go with the lowest 720p scenes anyway. NS is a major studio and this is reflected in their productions. All of the scenes use top-tier talent and the scene settings, lighting, sound and editing are all excellent. There is no doubt that these scenes are professionally produced, directed and edited. I haven’t encountered any issues using a download manager to queue scenes. I didn’t find that downloads were throttled and I didn’t find a download limit either. I found that download speeds were generally fast and on par with other studio sites. LKLK noted recently that he had trouble cancelling. I was billed through Epoch so I’m confident I won’t have this problem. The bottom line for me is that I would highly recommend New Sensations for anyone looking for a large studio site with mostly mainstream porn but that also serves some specific niches like incest porn. If you are subscribing for the first time this site offers an exceptional value. If you’re coming back to the site my recommendation is that you make this an annual visit because the update schedule is relatively slow 05-08-20  07:34am Replies (5) Review 174 New Sensations Network (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large studio site - Some great DVDs - Some unique niches - High production values - Many older titles available - Updates daily - Supports download managers Cons: - Not a true ‘network’ - Annoying download limit - Wide variation in video quality - Only started adding HD files recently - Many DVDs have missing scenes Bottom Line: New Sensations falls into the same trap that seems to snare so many studio websites: great porn let down by a just-okay site. While they market themselves as a network they really aren’t in the true sense of that word. While there are 22 other ‘sites’ in the network those sites are just a repackaging of what is available on the main site. If you go to the main New Sensations site you’ll have access to everything. I don’t see this as a major negative issue because it isn’t that big a deal and it is common with studio sites. I only point it out so no one joins expecting several distinct sites. Think of the ‘sites’ as just a high-level filter. The site is well laid out with search functions, drop-down menus and tags. I found that the site was easy to navigate and find what I was looking for. The site currently has around 1100 DVDs with over 5100 scenes so it is hard to argue that you’re not getting a lot of porn for your money. The production values really make most of the DVDs stand out. The lighting, sets, editing and sound are all well done here, even on older DVDs. And regardless of the year the DVD was produced, you’ll find a who’s who of porn stars here. All the scenes are available in streaming or for download. The downloads are available in Flash, MP4 and WMV. A major flaw with the site is that it has only been since 2013 that they started offering HD (1280 and 1920) so there are currently only about 200 DVDs in HD. To make matters worse, the site opted to use low bitrates so even the HD files don’t look as good as similar sites. When available I downloaded the 1280 files and they’re only 4000kb/s which means they can look blocky at times. Prior to 2013 the MP4 file available was for mobile devices so that leaves WMV as the best option. The older files come in at 640x480 and 2000kb/s. With specs like that they can only look poor by today’s standards, but I won’t complain because some of these are quite old and not available elsewhere. 1024x576 is also a fairly common file size though the bitrates here are low too at 2000. The Catch-22 with the site is that while I may have been better off downloading the highest resolution available (I usually balance quality and file size) but that would make the download limit even more frustrating. If you are interested though, the best files are the MP4s at 1920x1080 but the bitrate is still low at 4000. They do look better though. And speaking of download limits, there is one here. A problem with it is that they have created one that is theoretically not that bad but set it up in a way that functions in an annoying way. A member is only allowed to download 6GB of data in an hour and when you exceed that your access is cut off for an hour. Sure, the site can argue that they still give you access to 144GB per day, but given that they offer HD and if you have a fast internet connection you can find yourself cut off after not too long. I should also advise that the message that comes up is incorrect: it states you’re cut off for 12 hours, but it is only one hour. I confirmed that via email. To add to the frustration, you can’t even view the site while you’re in exile. (This applies to a full membership; it may be the full 12 hour lock-out for trial memberships.) Many of the DVDs are incomplete, which seems really odd for a studio site. The reason I can say this with some authority is that there are many DVDs that only have one or two scenes available, where the store version would have more than that. The site supports download managers (though they cite these are a reason for imposing a limit). While the studio covers the typical porn niches, they do have one that is fairly unusual and likely somewhat controversial: incest porn. Don’t shoot the messenger: I’m only pointing out that it exists here. The scenarios in these videos use a stepdaughter/stepfather, stepson/stepmother or step-sibling tryst as the basis for the scene. While I would in no way count myself as a fan of this genre I did find myself drawn to them because the scene set-up was really well done with a sexual tension building for the first few minutes. I’m a big fan of porn scene set-ups and like when there is a sexual tension created, and these scenes do it well. Besides, it is just fantasy and I’m not going to say no to scenes featuring some of my favorite stars. I’m really on the fence about recommending this site. Like so many other sites they have some great porn on offer but drop the ball in how it gets offered. The download limit is frustrating but is obviously just a short-term frustration while the low bitrates (and resulting lower quality videos) is something that will mar your viewing for years to come. If the site has some stuff you really want then I would recommend it even with the limitations, but if you’re just looking for a site to join you may want to keep looking. 06-02-14  04:31pm Replies (1) Review 175 Niches And Blows (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 32 scenes - Exclusive scenes - Two file resolutions - Some hot new models - Interesting niches - Bills through CC Bill Cons: - Not a traditional subscription model - Update schedule can’t be confirmed – updates not dated - No streaming - No photos Bottom Line: This is a site that is likely to generate some polarized positions. Some will see it as a tiny site with an unusual subscription model while others will see an upstart site offering some pretty good porn trying to make a go of it in a difficult business. In the interest of full disclosure I’ll confess to being firmly in that latter group. The site owners appear to have been listening to complaints on various forums, including this one, since they actively market to people looking for (or wanting to avoid) certain trends in porn. The site bills itself as being 100% POV, male talent that doesn’t speak during the scene, natural length scenes and cumshots that don’t include five minutes of the guy jerking off. As of this writing there are currently 32 scenes available. The scenes appear to be all exclusive to this site. Unfortunately I can’t say whether the site is updating regularly as the scenes are undated. If in the near future I find out the update schedule I’ll amend my review or add a comment. Most of the scenes follow a fairly standard format. I recognize that a lot of people find any format to be repetitive but my position is that if the format works then why not go with it? While I think the overall format does work here I also think that it could be improved by having more interaction between the female and male talent. The scenes are all POV and begin with a blowjob. (It’s fair to say that while the site isn't only oral it is skewed in that direction. That’s not a bad thing.) In many of the scenes the female talent begins while wearing something sexy like lingerie or a little black dress and usually removes that at some point during the scene. A majority of the scenes that I downloaded also included vaginal sex. That is usually alternated with more oral and all of the scenes I downloaded ended with a pop shot in the mouth followed by a swallow. There is a list of niches available that runs from what you’d expect (hair color, Latina, MILF, etc.) to more uncommon ones (LBD - little black dress, man shirt, wet head, etc.) As someone with a few odd interests I was pleased to see ‘wet head.’ Subjectively I find the scenes to be pretty hot but as a viewer who prefers the scene set up and the interaction between the talent the lack of that does diminish the heat somewhat. Each scene opens right in the action with no opportunity to build any sexual tension between the girl and the guy. Admittedly, this may not matter to a lot of buyers. It seems, however, that the heat built in the scenes relies entirely on the female model herself as there is no interaction between her and the male talent. In my opinion that can makes the scenes a bit too mechanical. Many of the scenes do build an intimacy with a lot of eye contact from the model. The site has a mix of relatively well-known models, such as Alexa Nova, but has mostly relative unknowns. The scenes are available in two resolutions: 1920x1080 and 1280x720. The 1080p scenes come in at 6000kb/s and 29fps. Due to the download model I didn’t check the specs on the 720p scenes. I can confirm that the 1080p scenes look good on a 24” monitor and a 50” TV. For those who like photos and streaming videos you’re out of luck as the site offers neither of those. The site supports download managers and has fast download speeds and it also bills through CC Bill. Perhaps the most unusual aspect of this site is the subscription method, or rather, the lack of it. Registration on the site is required and is free. A prospective member does not need to provide any credit card information at the time of registration. All registration gives you is the ability to see what scenes are available and to get a brief preview of each of them. Downloads are available at a reasonable cost of $1.50 USD but must be bought in a bundle of 10 downloads for $15. The downside to the pay-to-download model when bundled in packages of 10 is that it becomes more expensive if you really only want two or three scenes. While the choice to join any site has a big subjective component to it, and I recognize that this site provides a lot of what I like, I still feel confident in giving it an overall objective recommendation. While it is still small the cost is reasonable. What you get for a $15 package is the ability to download 10 exclusive scenes with relatively new models, most of whom are very attractive. Lastly, if you’re like me and measure value more on quality than quantity and like supporting small upstart sites this site certainly warrants looking at. This is a site that I will definitely keep an eye on in the future and will almost certainly continue to buy download packages if new scenes are added regularly. I hope the site owners do well. 11-30-16  02:32pm Replies (0) Shown : 151-175 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.5 seconds.