Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : rearadmiral (0)

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569) Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 176-200 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 176 Nubile Films (0) 98.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Top-quality site - Top-quality porn - A-list models - Large site - Logical site - Ability to sort and search - Updates often - Broad range of porn - Allows download managers - TBP discount - Bills through a reputable biller Cons: - It isn't free… (yeah, I’m kidding) Bottom Line: I know how subjective this perspective is, but I rejoined this site and I’m still surprised at how much I like it. I count Evil Angel, Hookup Hotshot and Holed among my favourite sites so finding so much I like about Nubile Films seems odd. But as subjective as that may sound, you can take it as an objective measure of just how good this site is. Nubile Films is one of two sites that I’d recommend to someone who is new to porn buying. The comparison between the sites I’d recommend comes down to whether that person wanted a low-quality all-you-can-eat buffet or a five-star restaurant. The buffet that I’d recommend would be Videobox for its low cost and huge selection with the caveat that much of it is crap. The recommendation for the person who wanted quality (at a low cost also, and arguably a much better value) would be Nubile Films. This site offers a broad range of scene types and models but offers quality that so many other sites lack. The scene types cover a broad spectrum at the softer end of the scale. There is a good mix of solo, girl-girl and boy-girl scenes with some threeways thrown in too. If all you like is solo masturbation then you’d find good value here. If you’re like me and prefer b/g then you’ll be happy too. The models also cover a narrower spectrum with a mix of European and American models and some difference in body types. There are several Latina models but not many black women, but that’s likely more a reflection that there aren't many black women in the business. Maybe all of the above is best summed up in the site’s own tagline: “capturing the essence of sensuality.” This isn't ‘hard’ hardcore where the model is thrown down and violated; this is sensual, romantic porn with a full dose of heat. I find that labelling a site as couples-oriented usually means that it’s boring, but this site manages to find that sweet spot of being couples-friendly while still being hot. The last time I reviewed this site it was relatively new and much smaller. The site has grown since then and continues to grow. The site currently has 630 scenes and adds a new scene every three days. There are currently 316 b/g, 107 solo and 158 girl/girl scenes. The remainder are threeways of g/g/g, b/g/g and b/b/g. The scenes are a natural length and not marathon endurance tests. I like how from its beginning in 2012 to now this site is a walk through a who’s who of A-list models at that time. The scenes are available to stream and download. Downloads are available as 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p and 240p. The 720p scenes are available as both MP4 and WMV while the others are MP4 only. These resolutions have been available since the site started so the oldest scene on the site still offers top quality. I downloaded the 720p files and the bitrates vary from 3500 to 8000kb/s. Framerates are 23fps. Subjectively the video quality is better than I’d expect given the bitrate. This is primarily a video site but photo collectors won’t be disappointed either. Photos are available in three resolutions: 3840x5760, 1333x2000 and 800x1200. Screenshots are also available in 1920x1080. All of these are available as singles or as zips. The site is logically laid out with the ability to sort scenes in multiple ways. You can also sort and search by model. Popular tags are offered and there is a search function available too. In short, the site makes it easy to find what you’re looking for. One innovative idea that the site had in 2015 was a short series called “Ask Me Anything” where a model was recorded taking member’s questions and answering them in the video. I like BTS scenes because they often offer some insight into what makes a model tick so I especially like these. This is something that I’d like to see make a comeback and be used more regularly. The site allows download managers and I had no problem with queuing up multiple scenes to download in sequence. I had no issues with the links timing out and the download speeds are on par with the best. The first day I accessed the site I downloaded a lot and I didn’t find a download limit. A personal preference would be for more anal scenes but I’m willing to accept that this isn't an anal site and anal doesn’t really fit here. The site bills through CC Bill which is certainly in the top three of reputable billers. You can join knowing that your card information is safe, problems will be resolved (though I highly doubt that any problems would occur) and cancelling is easy and convenient. I highly recommend that anyone seriously consider a membership at Nubile Films. Many sites that target a broad membership often fail to hit any target but this site, while offering a broad range of scenes, has a common thread of top quality. There really is a lot here for a lot of different interests. The site would offer a great value at full price but when you factor in the TBP discount it becomes a tremendous value. 01-14-17  06:48am Replies (1) Review 177 Nubile Films (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Beautiful models - Exceptionally good production values - Mix of American and European models - Mix of solo, g/g, b/g and multiples - Updates regularly - Multiple download formats and sizes for videos - HD available on all videos - Photos available (as singles and zips in multiple formats) - Allows download managers - Fast download speeds - Cross-sell at sign-up isn’t pre-checked Cons: - Anal is very rare - Models have little variation, so if you don’t like beautiful, petite 18-22 year olds maybe you should avoid the site. Bottom Line: I have to confess that I’m always a bit surprised when I find sites like this so good. This really isn’t the kind of porn I usually buy. I prefer harder-edged stuff from studios like Evil Angel and Kink.com. But maybe I’m wrong about my own habits because I really, really like this site. The best comparison I can think of for this site is X-Art: the women are exceptionally beautiful, the production values are exceptionally high, and the sex is sensual. This site is a great option for couples looking for something they can both enjoy. The site is relatively new, with the oldest uploads being added on August 28, 2012. With 133 videos and 110 photo sets available some may see the site as too small, but that position would be to completely ignore the low price of $20 per month and the overall quality of the site. The site continues to grow regularly with a new video being added every two days and a new photo set being added on alternate days (mostly, anyway). Videos are available primarily as mp4s (480x360, 640x360, 960x540, 1280x720HD and 1920x1080HD) with one WMV available at 1280x720HD. I downloaded the largest mp4s and those played at a bitrate of more than 7500kb/s and 23fps. Subjectively they look amazing. Keeping with the ‘natural and sensual’ feeling of the site, the scenes are shorter than found on some other sites because they’re a more realistic length. There is some music to start the scene but that quickly fades. None of the scenes were overacted with fake moaning. The videos have high production quality with lighting, sound and editing all being top tier. An issue some might have with the models is their lack of variation. They are almost exclusively 18-22, petite and Caucasian. If you like that general type of model then it’s safe to say that they are also incredibly beautiful. There is a good mix of American and European / Russian models too. The videos are a mix of solo girl, g/g, b/g and some multiples. In the multiples with a male, the women outnumber the man. The photos are available in three sizes (12800x800), 2000x1333 and 5600x3600). They’re available as zips or singles. The number of photos per set varies but the average seems to be around 150. The technical bits of the site are well done too. The layout is simple and effective and you can easily sort by photos and videos, and by tags. Streaming and download links are easy to use. The site supports download managers and I saw some of the highest download speeds I’ve ever had while downloading porn. Two points which are highly subjective and aren’t factored in to the score: 1) there is only one b/g anal sex scene on the site with both photos and videos; 2) facials are rare here: I like seeing facials and in this case I miss them more since several of the male models are channelling their inner Peter North with massive shots. I’m guessing the lack of facials is because the site is otherwise couples-oriented and most women aren’t as into facials as guys are. I’m obviously highly recommending this site after what I wrote above. It is some incredibly sensual porn with some stunningly beautiful women who are presented with high production values on a well laid-out site that has fast download speeds. Some may see it as small, but even ignoring the fact that it is growing regularly it is still a great value for the high quality and reasonable price. 05-08-13  03:13pm Replies (8) Review 178 Nubiles Casting (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 24 videos - 6 of the videos are casting interviews lasting just a few minutes - Updates with a new full scene added per week (interviews aren’t counted as updates) - Unique take on a relatively rare niche - Beautiful models - Great productions - All scenes offered in six different resolutions - Allows download managers - Excellent use of tags - Photos available (as singles or zips) Cons: - I’m not a big fan of the editing style Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of the casting niche; I find that when it’s well done it can be exceptionally hot. Yes, I know the models are acting, but when they are relatively new to the business and seem a bit nervous it adds to the heat. Most casting sites follow a fairly simple formula: the model arrives, is told about the business and is then asked to strip and eventually to perform for the camera. That’s present here, but the site adds a twist that I’ve not seen elsewhere: there is a ‘casting director’ who is behind the camera and he’s assisted by a beautiful model who is also trying out for a casting director position. There are two broad categories of scene here: interviews with the prospective female casting agents, and then the scenes where new models are put through their paces. There are currently six interview scenes and these are fun to watch and involve some nudity. They’re pretty short though, at less than five minutes long each. As of today there are 18 actual casting videos. Those range from 15 minutes long to just under and hour, with the average around 35-40 minutes. Like most casting sites, they follow a bit of a formula, and that’s not a bad thing. The prospective model arrives and there is some talk between her and the female casting agent, the model is talked out of her clothes and photographed and videoed by the female agent. The female agent gets partially nude, a male model is brought in and the female agent directs the action. (I should add, just to be clear, that the female agent is a porn star too and also very beautiful. All the models fit the Nubiles mold for beauty.) This is purely subjective, but I see casting videos as a bit of a hybrid between hardcore and behind-the-scenes stuff. I find the editing style here leaves too much out. This is just a preference, but I’d like to see more of the set-up and the move to different positions rather than an edit. I suspect that at least some of the motivation is to maintain the high standards that Nubiles has. Two things that these videos really have going for them over standard casting videos is that the interaction with the female agent really adds a unique twist, and I really like the fact that the scenes ‘break the fourth wall’ and we see the female agent taking photos and videos. The added bonus of this is that we also get two different camera angles. Each scene is offered in five MP4 resolutions and one WMV. MP4s are 1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360 and 480x270 and the lone WMV is 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4 files figuring that they’d be a good compromise between quality and size. Bitrates vary, ranging from under 4,000 kb/s to over 10,000 kb/s. Frame rates also vary, with a few scenes at 23fps, some at 59 and the majority at 29. I won’t pretend to understand why the site made these choices, but I can report that whatever the site does, it does it well: these scenes all look sharp and crisp with no pixilation with movement. This is, admittedly, nit-picky, but for those who prefer a specific file type there is an issue you’ll want to be aware of. My choice was to download the 1280 MP4 files. When I went to each scene the download choices are listed at the bottom in relatively small font. The problem is that the placement of the links for the 1280 MP4 and WMV files are swapped in at least six videos. All you need to do is pay attention, but if you’re like me and don’t notice it until later you’ll wonder how you managed to click on the same place for each scene and get two different file types. Clicking on the second-from the left file option is usually the MP4, but in some scenes it’s the WMV. The site updates with a new scene added each week. The interviews are short and don’t count as an uploaded scene. Like the main Nubiles site, this one uses tags to select for certain things you might be looking for in a scene. It may seem like overkill now as the site is small, but as it grows these tags will become a real advantage. The main Nubiles site does a lot of things well, but their use of tags sets a high bar and I’m glad to see them use it here too. I don’t collect photos, but it appears that this site follows the same high standards for the main Nubiles site. Photos are available as singles or zips in three resolutions: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800. The bottom line is that this is a small and growing site with a unique take on the casting niche. The price may seem high, but for the fee you get access to the full Nubiles site too, which is certainly a great value. The models are stunning, the production values are great, the site is well laid out and the scenes are hot. I’d recommend the site and it is one that I’ll rejoin once it grows more. 02-24-14  06:22pm Replies (4) Review 179 Nubiles Porn (0) 97.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Teen-themed network - Multiple sites with variations on the teen theme - AAA-models only - Top-tier production values - Logical layout - Network continues to grow – new sites added, consistent updates - Supports download managers - Bills through Epoch (though CC Bill is listed as the primary biller) - TBP discount Cons: None... and I gave it some thought... Bottom Line: I always try to separate my subjective opinion about a site from my objective thoughts. That way, I figure, I can still give a meaningful review to a site even if I don’t like what they have to offer. Fortunately for me, Nubiles Porn is a site where, regardless of how I look at it, the site is among the best around. I think this could be either subjective or objective, but I like NP because it offers high quality scenes (top models and great production values) on a site that is logically laid out and easy to use, it has a variety of teen-themed niches, some of which are underserved, and it offers great value for you porn dollar. This is an over-simplification, but a broad description of the network is that it is a collection of sites that all feature relatively mainstream B/G hardcore. The other identifying trait of the network is that they feature many of the top-tier models working in the business at any given time in scenes with near-perfect production values. Some may consider the lack of variation in the models to be a negative, but I don’t agree. NP has staked out a place in the porn business where they feature the freshest of the current crop of AAA-list models. Most are petite, most are Caucasian and most are under 22. There are plenty of other sites with a broader range of models and I think it works that NP has a narrower focus. While a member can view all available scenes under the NP heading, those scenes can also be sorted by site. The sites on the network are: • Step Siblings Caught: 54 scenes, adds two scenes per month. This site features scenes in the popular step-sibling niche. • Moms Teach Sex: 65 scenes, adds two scenes per month. This site has more variety to it than simply older women with a younger men, though there are lots of those here. There are also scenes where the older woman teaches a younger woman (usually a daughter or step-daughter) some of the finer points of sex with a willing guy. • Bad Teens Punished: 43 scenes, adds two scenes per month. This is relatively mainstream B/G porn with a bit of mild domination added to spice things up. • Princess Cum: 15 sites, adds one scene per month. Mainstream B/G porn. • Nubiles Unscripted: 12 scenes, no updates since May 2017. This is a variation on gonzo with the models being unscripted and flirting, often in public places, and then going somewhere to have B/G, G/G or multiples. • Nubiles Casting: 67 scenes, no updates since December 2015. This site has one A-list model act as an employee of an agent and cast another A-list model. The sex usually starts with some G/G action and then the male talent is brought in to round out the casting. • Petite HD Porn: 153 scenes, adds two scenes per month. As the site names promises, this is mainstream B/G porn (with a few G/G scenes too) featuring the top petite models in the business. • Driver XXX: 13 scenes, no updates since December 2015. Mainstream B/G sex in or near a vehicle. • Petite Ballerinas Fucked: 35 scenes, no updates since September 2017. It’s difficult to imagine a more truthful or descriptive site name… • Teacher Fucks Teens: 20 scenes, no updates since November 2017 (and they were irregular before that). The teacher here is usually an older woman and the scenes usually feature a younger guy and girl. Some scenes have an older male as the teacher with one or more younger models. • Bounty Hunter Porn: 5 scenes, no updates since September 2016. Bounty hunters catching young female fugitives and then nature takes its course. • Daddy’s Lil Angel: 2 scenes, both added in December 2017. I’m assuming that this site is active and will continue to grow. There aren't enough scenes here to peg a niche yet, but since both updates have anal sex I’m hoping that might be a theme here, though nothing in the name suggests that. • My Family Pies: 4 scenes, update schedule appears to be two or three scenes per month. The niche appears to be step-sibling incest while the rest of the family is in the room but oblivious to the sex. As the title suggests, most scenes have a creampie at the end. The technical side of NP very well done too. The site is logically laid out and there is a good use of tags. In his recent review of Petite HD Porn, lk2fireone noted that it can be confusing to switch between the sites in the network. I agree that a first time member would have that issue and I think that is caused by the pull-down menu being labeled ‘Series’ instead of site. I don’t want to take away from lk2fireone, but I consider this a minor issue overall. The site offers streaming and downloads, as well as both photos and screenshots in different resolutions. There is something for just about everyone. Apologies to all, but all the editing in the world couldn’t get this review to fit in the allotted space. I’ll wrap up in a reply below. 01-10-18  03:59pm Replies (9) Review 180 Nubiles.net (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge site - Excellent quality pictures and videos - Pictures and videos given equal effort - Stunning models - Good mix of North American, European and Russian models - Some porn A-listers and some relative unknowns - Many options for downloads - Well organized site (simple where it doesn’t need to be complex) - Good mix of softcore, girl-girl and hardcore - Best search function I’ve ever encountered - Supports download managers - Older material appears to have been ‘remastered’ to make it look better Cons: - Fairly tame for fans of hardcore Bottom Line: Subjectively, this really isn’t my kind of site. Having said that, this is a repeat membership for me since this was one of the first pay sites I joined six or seven years ago. I was impressed then, and I’m still impressed. Most PU members will know this site, so I won’t spend a lot of time describing it. Nubiles is a huge site featuring a bewildering array of young, beautiful models from around the world. There is enough variation in body type and age that anyone could join the site and find hundreds of models to fit his taste. The majority of the models are American (with some porn girls here too), Eastern European and Russian. But many other nationalities are represented too. The site currently says there are 1030 models, close to 600,000 pictures and over 5400 movies. I have no reason to think they’re making that up. Most sites seem to fall into either being a picture site or a video site. If they do one well, the other is just a necessary add-on. Not so here. Regardless if you’re a picture guy or a video guy you’ll see the site as exceeding your expectations. One format isn’t dominant over the other and one doesn’t detract from the other. This is a lesson many other large site could learn. Nubiles has been around since 2004 so you’ll obviously find some variation in picture and video quality. Having said that, it appears that the site has always pushed the limits of technology so even back in 2004 they were better than most. Even the oldest pictures and videos still look good. It also appears that some of the videos have been ‘remastered’ to make them better. If this is true, and I think it is, this underscores the site’s efforts to provide the best quality available. All but the oldest picture sets on the site are available in two sizes. All sets are available as singles or as a zip. The newer photos in high res come in at 1600x2400 and the low res are 800x1200. The older pictures are 800x1200, which would have been amazing quality in 2004. They may have been updated at some point. Photos sets vary from 60+ photos to 100+ photos. Subjectively, the quality is excellent. Videos are available in a wide variety of formats and sizes. There aren’t many other sites that offer this many options. Even the oldest videos on the site can be streamed or can be downloaded in multiple formats. Newer videos are available as streams in three different resolutions. Downloads are available in wmv, mpg, mp4 (low and high res), avi and mobile. Older scenes also offer the video in segments. My preference is WMV so that’s what I downloaded. They use codec 9 and the videos are 1280x720 @3600kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively, they look great. The search function on the site is incredibly complex in its operation but simple to use. It allows a member to sort models by personal attributes. The usual traits are listed, such as breast size, hair colour, race and age, but there are some obscure attributes that can be sorted too, like braces, skin tone (tanned or not) and even by nipple type. You can search by type of outfit, You want to see a model smoking? You can sort by that too. The setting is searchable too. I know I said that Met Art has the best search function I’ve ever seen, but Nubiles is better still. One thing I’ve never seen before and I wish would catch on is the ability for members to post links to other pay sites where the model has material. This is great for models who change their names a lot. To me, this function demonstrates the professionalism and customer-interest that Nubiles has. The only negative I can think of is purely subjective: the site is just a bit too tame for my liking. There are lesbian and hardcore scenes here, but they aren’t the main focus. Hardcore isn’t just an add-on, because those scenes are very well done, but the main focus is solo girl and solo masturbation. If you’re a hardcore fan there is enough here to warrant a membership but you won’t find anything that pushes the limits. I only found one anal scene, for example. The bottom line is that if you’re an active porn buyer you owe it to yourself to check this site out. It doesn’t try to be everything to everyone (the lack of ‘hard’ hardcore, for example), but what it does it does almost perfectly. The models are amazing, the photos and videos are well done and the site is laid out to help you find what interests you. I highly recommend Nubiles. It is definitely on my list of sites for repeat memberships. (One last thing: I only noticed this on one scene, but I wonder if other older scenes have the same issue. There’s a scene with “Kate,” aka Kathleen Kruz where she gives a blowjob and the scene has been edited to jump right into the event. The original scene had a brief but playful setup that made the scene so much better. I hope this hasn’t happened in many other scenes. In my opinion, the setup is as important as the sex.) 01-28-12  08:53am Replies (4) Review 181 Nude in LA (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - This site provides material in a poorly served niche – U.S. Public nudity - Some beautiful women strolling fully nude in public - At least a couple of well known stars participate (Hailey Young and Veronica Jett) - Daring and different (for the U.S., anyway) - Simple navigation (but how could it not be in a site this small?) Cons: - Small site (but it may grow) - Pics are available, but no zips - Videos are broken down into smaller files (approx. 35MB each) - No option for full-length videos - HD is available, but you have to pay extra for HD VOD - Download managers don’t work (I use Free Download Manager but not to bring in multiple files at the same time – just to queue up files so I don’t have to sit at the computer and click “save as” all evening) Bottom Line: Excellent Premise, Flawed Execution I’ve never been so torn in writing a site review. This site provides material that is almost impossible to find anywhere else – U.S. full public nudity. The site is small now (21 photo sessions with each session having shoots at four to six locations) but it does appear to be updating. I’m not sure of the update schedule. If I figure it out I’ll post an update. I give full marks to the models on this site – they put themselves at some risk of getting caught. The material itself is very good if you’re into this thing. If not, it will seem tame and even boring. My only complaint about the material is that the editors have managed to strip away a lot of the titillation too. The site presents women nude in public but never shows the set-up or the girls’ nervousness, which can be a big part of the draw for some people into this niche. The sense of daring is absent, much like it is on European sites. It shouldn’t be absent here though, since the models are at some risk doing this in the U.S. Otherwise, the women are beautiful and they get fully nude in public. But… the owners or managers went and fucked it all up. This site is a credit to websites of 10 years ago. There are pics, but no zips. There are videos, but they are low resolution and broken down into smaller files. Download managers are not supported. They claim that HD videos are available, but you’ll have to pay extra for those once you’re inside the site. There are things I’m willing to excuse: the site is new so there won’t be a lot of material yet. I understand that. But why put the models and crew at risk and then present the material in such a poor way? This is an under-served niche and those of us who like it would support a well done site. With changes, this could be a great site. For now, this site is only a good value if you are a die-hard nude-in-public fan. If, as the grow the site, they improve the video quality and provide full-length videos they could be an amazing site in a poorly-served niche. UPDATE March 30, 2010: in the one month of my membership I saw no obvious updates. There is still some decent material, but the site doesn't seem to be updating regularly. 03-04-10  09:07am Replies (1) Review 182 Nude In SF (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - One of only a few remaining American public nudity sites - Low price - Offers zips for photos - Bills through CCBill - May still be updating Cons: - Small site - Very few videos - Video resolution is low - Most video links are broken - Updates may be recycled - No recognizable models - Photo sets broken into several zips Bottom Line: This is a small site in a rare niche so I thought it would be worth joining at least once. The niche is public nudity in an American setting and those sites are getting harder to find, likely because the material is getting harder to make. Nude in LA doesn’t even exist any longer, and the best American public nudity site – Teasers VOD – was ordered to stop producing scenes by the LA city government a while back so there will be no more updates from them. This site is definitely small. There are only 33 models here with the look being more to the amateur side of the business. That’s neither a pro or a con, but merely a fact. You won’t find porn stars here like you used to be able to at some other public sites. The models appear to be all in their 20s with varying body types and few with tattoos. Overall, the models are pretty attractive. There is truth in some advertising, and the name of the site follows that rule: there is only one theme here: models in San Francisco shed their clothes and walk around in public areas being photographed. For a video collector, this site doesn’t have a lot to offer. Actually, that’s being far too generous. Of all the photo shoots it seems odd that there are only a dozen videos available. That’s bad enough, but it actually gets worse. Of the video links less than half actually work. But that may be the best news because the resolutions are so poor that even what is here is almost unwatchable. The resolution is only 640x360 at 1200kb/s and 15fps. Subjectively they look terrible. They look so bad on a 23” monitor that the watermark is almost unreadable. The technical aspect of the videos is so bad that I haven’t watched them so I can’t comment on their artistic merit. I should also add that the videos are also short – most are about 3mins long. Things are better with the photos. The number of photos for models varies from less than 50 to just over 1000. The average is about 300 photos per model. The resolutions aren’t too bad with the majority at 1752x2628. Newer photos are higher at 3744x5616, but there aren’t many of those. The site allows download managers but they aren’t really effective or necessary since the zip files are so small, with most being approximately 6MB. The problem is that for each photo set there may be 10 or more zips. If a model has a lot of shoots then you’ll be downloading a lot of zips – one model has over 60 zip files for her photos. Some of the zips have only two photos in them. There appears to be a relatively new feature called a “Nude Map” where the model’s route through public areas is mapped on Google Maps. This would be an innovative idea for a public nudity site but I can’t figure out how to get it to work. There is some evidence that this feature isn’t live yet even though it is being heavily promoted. The big question I have about the site that I can’t give a definitive answer to is whether the site is still updating. I think it is, but it appears that it is updating with mostly older material and whether that was shot a while ago and only made available now or whether it is recycled material I can’t say. The latest update was today (April 29) and the copyright on those photos is 2013, but most of the more recent updates have copyrights in 2010 and older. The latest video was uploaded in February and it looks as bad as the rest, which may indicate that it was actually recorded a long time ago. But in fairness to the site, they do have a list of updates and there are updates added at least twice a month. Whether those are really ‘new’ photos though could be open to debate. The site does actually offer a fairly good value, but only because it is cheap and not because it offers a lot of good material. They offer a $4.95 fee for a week of access that will rebill higher. The good news is that unless you still live with dial-up from the 1990s you can download everything they have in that time. With a decent internet connection you can have everything you want in under an hour. It also bills through CCBill so you can have some confidence that cancelling will be easy. (The page at TBP says that the membership is $4.95 for two weeks, but that isn’t what the site is offering now.) So can I recommend this site? Yes, but only to someone with a narrow interest in this niche who prefers photos. As a video collector I was badly disappointed, but the photos are decent. (Actually, they’re not ‘decent’ since they feature young ladies naked in public, but you get what I mean.) The small site size and limited offerings are offset by the low price, so if you need a fix of photos of nude models in the streets, this might scratch an itch for you. 04-29-13  06:34pm Replies (2) Review 183 Nuru Massage (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Massage-themed network with American models - Six distinct sites - Network and sites well organized - Five sites update weekly - Lots of viewing options - TBP discount - Supports download managers Cons: - Very little actual sex - No independent biller Bottom Line: This is my second time visiting this network and most of what I wrote in my 2012 review of Nuru Massage still applies. The biggest difference with this network now is how it is branded. Back in 2012 I don’t recall there being an overall name to the site. If you joined one massage-themed site you got access to the others. While the access part remains the same, the difference is that the network now has a name: Fantasy Massage. Most of the sites are the same as the last time I reviewed this network, but one has stopped updating and there are two new sites now. The originals are: All Girl Massage – 219 scenes, adds one scene per week Nuru Massage – 273 scenes, adds one scene per week Soapy Massage – 242 scenes, no new scenes added since April 2012 Massage Parlor – 319 scenes, adds one scene per week The two new sites are Milking Table and Tricky Spa. Tricky Spa is the newest with only ten scenes uploaded. A new scene is added weekly. The theme here is a little harder edged and more sinister than the other sites. With this site the premise of the scene is that the woman is tricked or coerced into giving the male masseur oral sex and there is some reluctance. I’m not sure how long this site will continue to grow since the user votes and comments are far more negative than positive. Not that I can summarize how other members feel about the site, but given the play on coercion it really doesn’t fit in well with all the other massage-themed sites here where the interaction is both fun and sexy. The other new site is Milking Table. It has 59 scenes and updates weekly. The premise of this site is a lot like the others, with a male customer and a female masseuse. The quirk of this site is that the massage table has a hole cut in it where when the male customer lies on his stomach his penis sticks through the hole and the female masseuse gets under the table to ‘milk’ him.’ While it does seem a bit odd to watch a woman suck a disembodied cock, an advantage that it does have is that it does away with the lead up to so many cumshots in porn these days where the last of the scene is the male model jerking off for a few minutes before coming on the female model. Here the table requires that the female model be a finisher. It’s a quirky site, but I subjectively I like it. Most of the technical aspects of the network remain the same, and since it was well done before there’s nothing wrong with that. The network is logically laid out, the sites are logically laid out, there is a model search page (for individual sites or the full network), there is a search function and there are tags too. The one difference I noticed is there are no longer any WMV files offered. The only file type now offered is MP4 and those are available in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080 resolutions. Streaming is also available in those same resolutions. I downloaded the 720p files and they come in at 1280x720, 4500kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively they look great on a 24” monitor and look fine on a 50” TV. The site supports using download managers and I had no problem using one. The download speeds were what I usually see on porn sites. Some miscellaneous observations: • As before there is a lot more oral action here than vaginal sex. • Anal sex is very rare. • The last time I was a member here it seemed that they were more Asian themed but that has changed too. Asians are certainly represented but the Caucasian models now outnumber them. • The scenes usually feature some of the better known U.S. A-list models working today. Many other massage sites feature Russian or European models so this is a good source to see your favorite American models in this niche. • For other dinosaurs like me out there the network acts a bit wonky with Internet Explorer so be prepared for some minor annoyances or use a different browser. • As with all other sites that are part of the Fame group of site, save your confirmation email as it will provide details on how to cancel. It isn’t that they make it hard, but they sure don’t make it as quick and easy as using a CC biller. The bottom line is that this network continues to offer a great value. For the low discount price offered through TBP you get access to hundreds of massage-themed porn scenes with some of the hottest models in the business. The sites are well organized and offer lots of choice for both streaming and downloads. I highly recommend joining if you like this porn niche. 08-05-14  05:42pm Replies (5) Review 184 Nuru Massage (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - $14.95 TPB/PU discount - Supports download managers (see comment below) - Scenes have a decent amount of heat and eroticism - Beautiful models, most well-known porn stars - Appears to be exclusive content - Very high production values - Updates regularly - Seems to be affiliated with the Fame Digital Group - Can sort by tags and models Cons: - Limited resolutions available for WMV users - The theme may be repetitive for all but the most ardent massage aficionados - Lack of hardcore sex may be an issue for some - No independent biller (see comment) Bottom Line: This site doesn’t market itself as a network, and I’m not saying it is one, but membership to one site gets you membership to three other massage-themed sites so I’ll cover all four sites here. While there are subtle variations between the sites the basic elements are the same in all of them: a guy walks into the massage parlor to get a massage. The girl greets the guy, they undress and shower together, they usually start the massage in a large tub and then the massage continues on an air mattress or massage table. In Nuru Massage they use a thick, clear massage oil for which the type of massage and this site are named. In Soapy Massage they use soap bubbles as the medium, and the massage is a bit more traditional in Massage Parlor. In all cases there is a ‘happy ending’ and in 80% of scenes on all sites there is oral. There are a few sex scenes, but those are rare. All Girl Massage seems to follow a similar pattern, though I didn’t watch many of those. Some potential members might find the massage theme can get a little dull after a while. I agree that it can, but if you like massage as a niche this is definitely well done. The models play their roles well and they keep the heat and eroticism turned up. Some may not like the fact that there is very little sex (apart from oral), but I think that adds to the heat and realism. The details on each site are: • Nuru Massage – 166 videos, updates with one video per week • Massage Parlor - 220 videos, updates several times per week with the addition of one scene per update • Soapy Massage – 242 videos, updates irregularly and infrequently, but at least one scene per month is added • All Girl Massage – 106 videos, updates with one video per week The site is either affiliated with or uses the same web design as Fame Digital. I think it’s the former. This is a good thing, in my opinion, because the quality of these sites is very good. And like other Fame sites there is a TBP / PU discount. Unfortunately, like other Fame sites, they don’t use a biller though I’ve never had a membership issue with any Fame site before. TBP includes Nuru Massage as an Asian site, which seems appropriate considering the idea of Nuru massage is Japanese, but while there is a higher percentage of Asian models on the site than on many other porn sites, I don’t think I’d call this an Asian site. It may be that when TBP reviewed it originally the site had more Asian models, but now they aren’t even in the majority. When you consider all four sites as a group this is definitely not an Asian site. That could be good or bad, depending on your tastes. The models are all beautiful and most are well known porn stars. There are different body types to suit most tastes. Some have too many tattoos but that’s just part of the business these days. In his earlier review, GCode noted there were only 15 models on the site. This has improved significantly with 77 available now. The scenes all appear to be exclusive. I collect massage-themed stuff and I’ve never seen them elsewhere. Also, given that the set and set-up is essentially the same for all the scenes that supports that these are exclusive. The production values are great too: the lighting, sound, camerawork and editing are all top-notch. There is no search function on any of the sites but one isn’t needed either. You can sort the scenes using different tags and you can sort by model. This may sound too limiting, but given the single theme of the sites it works well. If you’re familiar with Fame sites the site design will look familiar. Each scene opens to a page where you can download or stream the video. Video downloads are available as WMVs in 240p or 480p resolutions. MP4s are available in 240, 480, 540, 720 and 1080p. I prefer WMV files and I downloaded the 480p ones which come in at 720x400 at 2200kb/s and 30fps. I can’t make any assessment of the MP4s. While I understand why a site would limit WMVs (due to the larger size, I suspect) I do wish that they offered more choice with that file type. In their defence, even though the numbers don’t look all that impressive, subjectively the videos look great. An issue I’ve had in the past with Fame sites is that they have a short time-out on the links which makes using a download manager difficult. I’ll admit that I have a faster connection from the last time I had a Fame membership, but the problem doesn’t seem to be nearly as bad here as I’ve experienced in the past. The bottom line is that I’d definitely recommend these sites. As usual, the caveat is that you have to like the set-up, but for the price it is even worth it to join just to get a few addition scenes with some favourite stars. The sites have excellent material to offer and they offer it through a website that’s easy to use and they sell it at a great price. The whole combination is an excellent value. 07-05-12  06:46pm Replies (0) Review 185 Nuru Network (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Excellent massage-themed site - Large site (875 scenes) - Regular updates - Supports download managers - TBP discount - HD available on all scenes uploaded after August 2008 - Hot scenes with great scene set-up - Good mix of models (lots of Asian models, variation on age and breast size too) Cons: - Can’t sort by theme - A few too many larger-breasted models for my personal taste Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of massage-themed sites; when they’re done well they are great. The good news is that this site is very well done. I have no idea what the relationship is between this site and the other Nuru Massage site (which includes All Girl Massage, Soapy Massage and Massage Parlor) but there is one since this site has all the same scenes on it. When I reviewed Nuru Massage I guessed that it was somehow related to the Fame family of sites and that is now confirmed. I had intended to rejoin Nuru Massage but instead ended up here. I’m not sure whether I was redirected here or whether I just made an error. No big deal though, since this “network” has all the same scenes and continues to update. Since the scenes here are the same as the other network, they fall into four broad categories. You have your regular massage, a soapy massage, a nuru massage and girl-girl massages. (Hmmm… that started to sound like a car wash menu. I should see if my local carwash offers girl-girl too…) This is subjective, but I like to watch the scene set-up almost as much as the scene itself and these scenes all follow a similar script which permits a great (though admittedly repetitive) set-up. The guy arrives and is greeted, there is a conversation about the services offered, they move to the massage room where the girl undresses the guy and then herself, they usually shower together and then the massage begins. With very rare exceptions, the scenes have oral on the guy with a happy ending. A few scenes (maybe 20-ish) have actual intercourse. I only saw one anal scene. (Frankly, if I ever get a nuru massage I’ll damn well expect anal.) This is subjective, but the female models are all attractive, with most being A and B list porn stars. The people who book the talent appear to like bigger breasts than I do since I found most of the models have bigger breasts than I prefer. There are some small boobies though, so there is something for everyone. There are a lot of Asian models (maybe close to half), with the remainder mostly Caucasian. Models of color are there, but rare. Currently there are 875 scenes posted with a new scene being added every two days (three sometimes. Maybe weekends?) As with all Fame sites the videos are offered in a wide range of sizes. Streaming is available at resolutions of 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Downloads are available in WMV or mp4 format in resolutions of 160, 240, 360 and 480. The mp4s are also offered in higher resolutions of 540, 720 and 1080. The first scenes on the site date from August 2007 and this site jumped on the HD bandwagon early and started offering 1080p a year later in August 2008. Since then every scene is available in 720 and 1080. I used to exclusively download WMV format but have since decided that life is too short for low-res porn so I’ve switched to mp4s in the highest resolution available. The 1080p files are 1920x1080 at 6500kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively they look great on both a monitor and large-screen TV. Photos are available, but since this is clearly a video site I didn’t check them out much. They do open in a unique viewer and I couldn’t find a zip download. They are also just screencaps. A constant complaint that I’ve always had with any Fame site is that the download links time out very quickly. Fame seems to have improved this (confirmed on other Fame sites too) because I didn’t experience any time outs at all. That’s not to say that there isn’t still a limit, but if there is one it is much more reasonable. The site allows download managers and if there is a daily download limit I didn’t hit it and I downloaded almost 200GB in one day. Navigation is simple but effective. There are 15 scenes per page and those scenes open into a separate page with the download and viewing options. You can also sort by star. The only complaint I have is admittedly trivial, and would possibly be solved had I actually joined through Nuru Massage. This site doesn’t break the scenes down by the four broad themes. So if you really want only the girl-girl stuff you have to scour the large thumbnails for each scene. The only differentiation is when you actually play the video and the site name is shown. I do wish there was a way to sort by theme. I highly recommend this site to anyone who like massage-themed porn. The models are hot, the production values are high, the site is large (and expanding), well laid-out, the scenes are easy to download and the scenes are offered in ways that will satisfy most subscribers. This is a great site. 05-25-13  11:52am Replies (0) Review 186 Nympho (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Mike Adriano site - All vaginal - Lots of ass play - Lots of oil play - All A-list talent - 22 scenes - Easy to use site - Updates every five days - Screenshots available - Full tour available - Three resolutions for download - Streaming - Supports download managers - Fast download speeds Cons: - No TBP discount - No self-serve cancellation feature with the biller (Customercare.co) Bottom Line: Nympho is Mike Adriano’s latest site which started in late 2018. This site features all vaginal sex and compliments Mike’s other two sites, Swallowed, featuring oral sex, and True Anal, featuring, obviously, anal sex. If you’re familiar with Mike’s work this site follows the same formula that he uses in all his scenes. The bad thing is that it gets repetitive but the good thing is that at least you know what you’re getting. The formula for the scenes here is the same that Mike uses in almost all of his scenes these days: the model starts off posing in some provocative clothes, she flashes and strips off some of them, Mike goes down on her licking both her pussy and ass, there is usually anal penetration with a finger, the model goes down on Mike, and then the sex begins. The scenes usually end with a (sometimes fake) creampie or a facial. One often-polarizing act that Mike includes in many of his scenes is having the models rim him. That happens in approximately 75% of the scenes here. For a site that features vaginal sex exclusively it is still quite ass-obsessed, but that’s a trait with Mike. Mike spends some time worshipping the asses of the models. Most get a finger inserted too. As a guy who is at least as ass-obsessed as Mike I approve! One Adriano trait appears in almost all of the scenes here – the scenes feature a lot of oil being used. Mike has a large bottle of it available and generously applies it to the model so that by the end of the scene both are covered in it. This is neither a pro or a con for me but if you’re into that then it’s another advantage to joining this site. Most of the scenes are B/G but there are several B/G/G. Obviously, Mike Adriano is the sole male talent in the scenes. Most of the models have the typical porn model look. The models here are all A-list: it’s a who’s who of the biggest names in porn. Because this is a vaginal sex-only site Mike is able to bring in some models who don’t do anal and therefore might not otherwise appear in a scene with him since he is definitely skewed more to anal scenes. Most of the scenes run just over an hour in length. All of the scenes are up to Mike’s usual high technical standards – the lighting, camerawork, sound and editing are all top-notch. The site itself is logically laid out and easy to use. There are tags for those searching for something specific. The site currently has 22 scenes available with a new one being added every five days. The scenes are available in three resolutions: 1080p, 720p (in two bitrates – 5000 and 1500 kb/s) and 360p. I found download speeds to be fast and I had no problems using a download manager. I didn’t have any timeouts and the downloads were stable. I didn’t find any download limits. Streaming is available too. While the site is primarily a video site there are screenshots available as singles and as zips. The resolution is good at 3000x1688. Many of the zipped files have nearly 1000 images in them. The site doesn’t have many shortcomings. Some may see it as a bit too small just yet but it is growing. Unfortunately there is no TBP discount which would go a long way to offsetting the small site size. Another minor flaw is that the biller that the site uses, Customercare.co, doesn’t have a self-serve means to cancel your membership – you have to email them or use chat. Still, I haven’t ever had a problem with cancelling through this biller but you’ll want to leave yourself some wiggle room. As an avid porn collector I’ll take quality over quantity any time and it does seem that Mike Adriano is stretching himself a bit thin these days. He has three sites on the go and still puts out some original scenes at Jules Jordan (though I read that he may be returning to Evil Angel soon). Nympho and True Anal promise at least six scenes per month each and Swallowed promises at least 7 scenes. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Mike has resorted to faking some of his cumshots. In my opinion, that’s a sign that he needs to slow down a bit. The bottom line is that Mike Adriano is one of the most prolific directors/performers working today and he’s known for producing some great porn. This site is up to his usual standards. It’s an opportunity for someone not into anal scenes to get some Mike Adriano in their collection though the scenes still feature a lot of ass play. The scenes are all with some of the hottest talent and each scene brings a lot of heat. The site is still a bit small but I think the value is still there given the heat and quality of the scenes. A TBP discount would fix any value concerns immediately. As a collector, I’m glad I joined the site and highly recommend that anyone check it out. (As with all of Mike’s sites, there is a full tour available so go check it out.) 02-03-19  11:56am Replies (0) Review 187 Old N Young (0) 85.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Moderate sized site - Beautiful models - Rare site in an under-served and shrinking niche - Part of a larger teen-themed network - Several downloading options - High quality video - Logical site - Photos and screenshots available - Supports download managers - 50% discount through TBP/PU - Bills through a reputable biller (Vendo) Cons: - Only updates once per month - Models are mostly Eastern European with not a lot of variety - Not much variety in the male models either Bottom Line: Old n Young is a site that caters to the niche of older male models with much younger, barely legal female ones. Unfortunately, this is a niche that seems to be shrinking as fewer studios are producing it. The models are some of the best-looking young Europeans. Based in Prague, they have selected mostly Eastern European models that across the board are beautiful. However, if you are looking for variety, either ethnically or in body size, you won’t find that here. In contrast, if you like thin blondes there are many of those. Subjectively, these young, petite models are exactly what I prefer so I personally don’t see the lack of variety as a negative. While there is not much variety in the models looks, they are all an older man’s fantasy as they are quite enthusiastic. Many of the models appear to be very early in their careers or they could even be one-and-done which, in my opinion, adds to the heat in this niche. There are, however, established and well-known Eastern European models. Eveline Dellai, Lady Dee, Rebecca Volpetti, Cindy Shine and Vinna Reed all have scenes here There are very few male models and they are in multiple scenes and also appear on other European old/young sites. They are all much older than the women. The talent pool must be small. I don’t see this as either a positive or a negative. It just is. One thing that is worth mentioning is that this site really does cater to old/young in that there is a significant age difference between the models. I find that in many American scenes (which usually use the stepfather/stepdaughter premise) there is often no realistic age difference between the models. The scenes themselves are quite standard hardcore scenes. If anything, they tend to lean more towards the softer side of hardcore. All the scenes feature extended foreplay, with the men performing oral on the women, as well as the reverse. Maybe it’s just the porn that I gravitate to, but men going down on women doesn’t happen often enough with many other studios. I am a huge fan of anal scenes and because this is an Eastern European site I expected to see quite a bit of that. But they are quite rare here, with only seven scenes having anal sex. Most of the scenes have a mild plot to set the stage for the sex. For example, the man could be a burglar or the woman is delivering food to the older male customer. In my opinion, having some basic premise for why this older man is getting to have sex with this young, beautiful woman makes the scene hotter. The site currently has approximately 139 videos available. While all of them are listed as being HD, the earliest 76 videos are from 2007 to 2009 and are not true HD I found the quality of those videos to be quite low by today’s standards. The site started updating again in 2014 and has since added over 60 videos. The change in video resolution between the old and new scenes is significant. While the quality of the older videos isn’t great, you do still get access to more than 60 true HD scenes. The site is still updating though it is quite slow with only one new video being added each month. The quality of the latest updates is an outstanding 3840x2160, 18000 kbps, 1080p 8000kbps and 25 FPS, 720p, 480p and 360p. These specs are really class-leading and the new videos look excellent. Screenshots are available for each video. The site itself is straightforward and easy to use. The usual means of sorting through scenes is available here though, in my opinion, a robust search function isn’t essential in a moderately -sized site like this that focuses on a narrow niche. A big advantage to this site is the fact that it is part of one of the better Eastern European / Russian teen-themed sites, Teen Mega World. If you like teen-themed porn, then you are already likely well aware of TMW. Even as someone who prefers American porn, I regularly subscribe to TMW because the models are beautiful and the sex is hot. I used a download manager and didn’t find any issues with doing so. I also didn’t run into any download limits. Download speeds were what I would expect on similar sites and I found them to be quite fast though this will depend, of course, on your Internet connection. The site (and network) bills through Vendo. While this biller isn’t as well-known as some others, I have subscribed to many sites through them and find them to be safe, secure and easy to cancel when that time comes. The bottom line is that even with some of the relatively minor flaws within this site it’s still one that I would highly recommend for anyone interested in this specific niche. The models are beautiful, the sex is sensual and natural and the site itself is easy to use. Add to this the fact that you get access to a great network and a half-price discount through TBP/PU and recommending this site is easy to do. It’s definitely worth checking out. 02-08-21  07:10am Replies (0) Review 188 Only Teen Blowjobs (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 372 BJ scenes - 200+ (and growing) scenes in HD - Lots of up ‘n comers - Beautiful models - Updates regularly - Impressive options for both streaming and downloading - TBP/PU discount - Supports download managers - Comes as part of a collection of sites giving access to almost 2700 scenes - Appear to be exclusive Cons: - Older scenes (pre-mid-2009) are in low res only - Page-to-page navigation could be improved Bottom Line: I realize that I wrote in my My XXX Pass review that I didn’t really see this as a network so it may seem odd that I’m now writing a review of something that I don’t necessarily see as a stand-alone site, but I wanted to offer a counterpoint to some of the criticism aimed at the site (and the main site, MXP) by other PU members. First off, while he may not be around to defend his position, I think that there is a high probability that PornoPro’s comments are really directed at the other BJ ‘site’ on this network, Throated. PornoPro wrote that “When a guy puts his hands on the back of a girls head and tries to ram his cock down into her stomach, it turns me off big time.” That may describe the BJ scenes at Throated, and with a name like that it shouldn’t be a surprise to find rough oral. I can’t say for sure that this kind of rough oral doesn’t exist on OTBJs, but if it does I haven’t seen any in all the scenes I’ve downloaded and watched. Regarding the main site, others have complained of problems with emails being sold and slow download speeds. I’ve been a member several times and have never experienced anything negative and only had fast downloads. Moving on to the review, this is a great site that delvers what the title promises: there is only oral, and all of the models certainly look like they’re 18 or 19. Many of the uploads feature models who are relatively unknown or who are just beginning their porn career. This means that you get some fresh faces, but you also get access to some early scenes of models who will go on to be A-listers. The model’s looks are fairly consistent: petite, some tattoos and piercings. Basically what any 18 or 19 year old looks like these days. There is very little ethnic diversity though. The scenes follow a bit of a formula in that they usually start off with some interaction between the model and her partner, there is often a bit of striptease and then the oral begins. The scenes may not be true ‘couples’ porn, but they’re close. Most of the scenes run between 20 and 25 minutes long. I can’t guarantee that these are exclusive, but I’m 99% sure they are. As with the other ‘sites’ here, the options for viewing or downloading the scenes are impressive. WMVs are available in resolutions of 160, 240 and 360. MP4s are offered in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Streaming is available as 160, 240, 360, 480 and 540 and mobile users can download in 160, 240, 360, 48, 540 and 720. No member should feel cheated on these options, unless you’re hooked on HD in WMV format. I downloaded the 720p scenes and those come in at 1280x720 at 4800kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively they look crisp and sharp. The ‘site’ currently has 372 scenes uploaded and it is updating with a new scene being added every week. While that sounds like a slow pace, keep in mind that this ‘site’ is packaged with seven others (a new one was recently added – Sun Lust XXX) so you’ll get two, three or sometimes four updates per day. (Keep in mind that your membership gets you almost 2700 scenes in total.) The one flaw here is the same one that pops up throughout this network. Some may have no issue with it too. The problem is that sometime in mid-2009 they began uploading the HD stuff. That’s not bad, but there is a sharp cut-off point where you go from having the highest resolution at 360p and then it takes a leap ahead to 1080p. It would have been great if back in 2007 or 2008 they had started offering 720p. Having said that though, over half the uploads are available in HD and all new scenes have that option. The site allows download managers and I experienced no time-outs, though in the past I found that links timed out at around the two hour mark. I found downloads to be fast and steady. I had no periods of reduced speeds and never had a download stop on me. One minor complaint that I’m going to start complaining about in reviews is that when a site is structured to show multiple scenes on a page and then there is a list of page numbers on the bottom, the site should also give members the option to select a page number directly. At the main site there are 179 pages, but if you want to go to page 100 you can only click forward five pages at a time. This would make the site much more easily navigated. And this occurs in lots of sites, I just happened to complain about it here first. As I said at the beginning of this, I don’t want to detract from the other reviews and comments but I do want to let other PU readers know that I experienced no problems with this site or the others that come with the membership. Further, I really like this site and the others offered. They offer great value at the discounted price available through TBP/PU, they have a large number of HD videos and they continue to add more daily. I highly recommend that anyone interested in this type of porn take the plunge and join. 01-09-14  04:07pm Replies (0) Review 189 Pamela Spice (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Super-cute, young model - Video and photos available - Photos available in zips - Multiple options for downloads - Part of a small network of similar sites - Some girl-girl scenes - Supports download managers - Decent download speeds Cons: - Not updating - Many of the other models on the network are topless only - The only B/G hardcore scene costs extra Bottom Line: First, please note that I agree with everything that exotics4me wrote in his recent review. Read that first if you want to join this site. My review will attempt to expand on a few things. I’m not normally a big fan of solo girl sites. I find them boring and repetitive and they tend to have a shorter lifespan than many other kinds of sites. I’ve also been burned by a couple (notably Little April and Little Summer) due to the terrible quality of the videos. Then one day I noticed the picture that accompanies exotics4me’s posts on the forum and I was hooked. Pamela is an amazing looking young South or Central American model. She can’t be much over 18 in many of the photos and videos and her youthful appearance is further accentuated by her braces. She appears solo in many scenes and also does a lot of girl-girl scenes. Both the pictures and videos are well lighted and shot. The other models she appears with in the girl-girl scenes are also attractive in the same way that Pamela is. There is one boy-girl hardcore scene available, but in a greedy marketing twist the site sells that separately. I like Pamela, but not enough to spend $20 for a 13 minute video of her having sex. Exotics4me notes that several of the videos feature some exhibitionism. That’s correct, but I’d characterize it as ‘exhibitionism-lite.’ It isn’t promoted as being one of the reasons for joining, but there are some scenes of her teasing a bit in public places. But the exhibitionism is fairly tame and I wouldn’t recommend taking a membership for that reason alone. The site is part of a small network of that includes access to six similar sites. The additional sites are also small and don’t appear to be updating. At least two of the sites (Selena Spice and Spice Twins) don’t even feature full nudity. They’re topless only with a thong or some other covering on the naughty bits. The additional models are attractive and young, but I think that Pamela is the best looking of all of them. The technical bits are pretty simple given the small size of the site. There are 68 photo sets (zips available, 798x1200 resolution) and 108 videos. The videos are available in three formats: Super HQ, MP4 and Low Speed Video. I downloaded only the “Super HQ” size and found that while they may have been industry standard when they were shot, they certainly aren’t now. They’re all 720x480 with the bitrates ranging from 2000 to 8700kbps. The technical description mostly applies to the other sites on the network too. Pamela Spice is definitely good looking and fits my usual style of model that I like. If you like young looking models you might be happy with a membership. The girl-girl stuff, the minimal exhibitionism and the additional sites all contribute to the value of the membership, but given that there are no updates I wouldn’t call this a good value. That’s not to say you shouldn’t join, but just join with your eyes open. 05-15-11  11:55am Replies (9) Review 190 Paradise GFs (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Beautiful EE/Russian models - Twins! - Scenes on location in Thailand - Interesting variety - Exclusive scenes - Streaming and downloads - Multiple download resolutions - Photos as singles and zips - Logical site layout - Low price - Allows download managers - Fast download speeds Cons: - Small site - Doesn’t appear to be updating - Large watermark on all videos - All POV (with a cameraman who isn’t good at it) Bottom Line: I could start and end this review by simply writing ‘petite redheaded twins’ which alone should be enough to cause people to buy a membership but I’ll add a few more details. The premise of the site is that the site owner/talent/cameraman is a fashion photographer who brings in models to his Thailand home to shoot them and ends up having sex with them. It’s a pretty thin premise but it doesn’t interfere with the scenes so it isn’t an issue. Each ‘shoot’ takes place over five days with some outdoor photos, outdoor sex, pool sex, indoor sex and some dancing in a nightclub. The sex scenes are all POV and there is really nothing unusual about them. That’s neither good or bad but if you join looking for twist you won’t find it here. Most scenes start with an outdoor photoshoot. In many cases the sex begins outside but then moves inside. In a few cases the entire sex scene is shot outdoors. One advantage that the site does have is that it offers rare ‘on location’ shoots in Thailand. I’m presuming that this site is able to shoot in Thailand simply because the site owner/male talent lives there. The site is very small with only 15 scenes offered. There are three separate shoots with each purportedly shot over five days. The only models on the site are Kitty and Nikky Fox, a model named Cassie I’m not familiar with and Gina Gerson (as Valentina on this site). I wouldn’t ordinarily describe the models on a site but since there are only four of them and three are relative unknowns it might help to do that this time. The Fox Twins (Nikky and Kitty) are identical 20-year-old twins from Hungary. I wasn’t aware of them until this site was listed and they don’t have much else on the internet. Nikky does have more scenes than Kitty and in some scene she has black hair though I think her natural colour is the reddish hair she sports on this site. The twins are petite and have a girl-next-door look to them. I hope to see more of them. I know nothing about the model named Cassie. She’s a young brunette from somewhere in Eastern Europe. She’s also got a girl-next-door glow about her. She’s also got the only anal scene on the site. I’ve searched for her on model indexes but haven’t found anything. Gina Gerson needs no introduction to porn collectors. Gina is a late-20s (though she doesn’t look over 20) petite Russian blonde. For Gina fans this site may be a necessary addition to your collection simply because she has little to no makeup on through the scenes and her natural beauty shines through. As Gina is well known for her anal sex this site is a rare collection of vaginal-only scenes. The site itself is logical and easy to use, but it should be with only 15 scenes. There are some ads but they are easily ignored if you want to tune them out. The scenes are available in streaming and downloads. I’m happy to report that the streaming doesn’t start automatically when the page loads. That’s a pet peeve of mine. There are no resolution options for streaming but there are four available for the downloads. Those are: 1920x1080 (4900 kb/s), 1280x720 (2300), 854x480 (1100), 640x360 (660). The bitrate is low on all of the videos and while that does help keep the file size down it also means that even the 1080p scenes aren’t as crisp as they could be. Photos are also available as singles and zips. They are 2600x1463 resolution. I had no issues using a download manager and I found that the site had fast download speeds. The site has a few minor flaws. Every video has a watermark that is much bigger than it needs to be. Also, all of the scenes are shot POV (this does appear to be a one-man operation). Well shot POV is rare and takes some real talent. The guy on this site doesn’t have the talent that comes from experience so his camera work is often unsteady. If the site continues to grow the owner should make an investment in some stationary cameras set up on tripods. The biggest flaw in the site is that it doesn’t appear to be updating. When I joined the site had three separate five-day shoots and that’s all that is there still. I have no idea whether more shoots will ever be added and if they are when they might be uploaded. But to be safe it’s probably best to assume that this site won’t update again. While some may disagree, I think that this site still offers fair value even though it’s small, doesn’t appear to be updating and has a few other minor flaws. But I admit that I’m looking at this through the lens of an avid porn collector rather than someone who spends time on pirated Tube sites. I think that $15 for 15 exclusive and unique scenes with some beautiful models shot in exotic locations is good value. My personal bottom line is that I’m happy with my membership and I’m glad I joined. It’s worth checking out the tour pages at least. 01-08-19  03:34pm Replies (0) Review 191 Passion HD (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site - Top models - Some variation in model type - Updates regularly - Bills through Epoch - Streaming and downloads - Screencaps and photos available - Many exclusive scenes - No obvious download limits - TBP discount Cons: - Some inconsistency in video quality - Downloads time out - Not many download options - Search function not accurate - Generic file names - Misleading file resolution labels - Ads for sister sites Bottom Line: Passion HD (PHD) is a site that is affiliated with Porn Pros (they share the same parent company) but they aren't part of the Porn Pros network. In fact, PHD itself isn't part of a network at all. A membership to this site just gives you this one site. But at least the site is large and offers some good porn. The site currently has just under 220 videos and will continue to grow at a decent pace with a new video being added every two to three days. There have been comments before that PHD may be uploading some renamed Porn Pros scenes but without a PP membership I can’t confirm that. If you’re reading this and know that answer please post a comment with the information. TBP says that some of the scenes are exclusive. Most of the models on the site are new, fresh and likely destined for stardom. While a vast majority are white there is some variation in body type, though I wouldn’t recommend you join if you have a thing for big breasts or fuller-figured women. Because the site has been around a while (since 2011) and books the top new talent available this site can be a great chance to see some of your favorites in some of their earliest scenes. What’s the porn like? For better or worse it’s the kind of porn you’d expect to see at a site like this. This isn't a fetish site and doesn’t target just one group. The porn is good if a bit generic in that you’ll find all the major porn niches available here. (Though for anal fans like me, there isn't much of that.) Where the site has some shortcomings is in the videos themselves, both in how the videos are presented and how they look once you download them. Each main page shows 12 large thumbnails and lists the star and gives a scene name and upload date. Clicking on the thumbnail brings you to a separate page with all the options to stream or download the video. Most videos offer three download choices: a WMV and an MPG in 1080p and a MP4 in 480p. This seems like an odd choice to only offer a low-resolution MP4. I’ve been an active porn collector for many years and it seems like MP4 is becoming the standard. And I can’t think of the last time I saw MPG files offered. I downloaded the WMV files because I found that the MPG versions crashed often in both WMP and VLC. But that could be my problem alone. To make matters worse, I found that a vast majority of the scenes labelled as 1080p, which I’d expect to be 1920x1080, were actually only 1280x720. And with bitrates between 2500 and 5000 kb/s the scenes could look a bit pixilated and clunky. Not always, but sometimes. I think the best way to describe the quality of a collection of scenes from PHD would be as ‘inconsistent.’ To be fair, there are some scenes where there is a true 1080p MP4 file, but they are rare. Streaming is also available but it appears to be only available in one resolution. Photos are also available in both screencaps and pictures. The pictures are available as singles or zips and are 1000x1500. Pro or con, Passion HD is one site in a large group of sites and if you’re interested in a specific model you can see other scenes with her at the bottom of the scene page you’re on. The problem with that is that if you don’t have a subscription to that site you’re out of luck. I used a download manager (IDM) and found the download speeds to be on par with what I get on similar sites. There was no obvious download limit and I specifically went looking for one on a lazy Saturday so if there is one, it’s more than reasonable. I did find that download links timed-out after about 15 minutes so you won’t be able to queue-up a bunch of scenes and have a nap. The site bills through Epoch so you can be assured of good billing support and an easy cancellation when you want to do so. A couple of minor negatives are that the search function isn't all that accurate. I searched for ‘anal’ scenes and got a few, but as I went through the site in more detail I found a few others. Also, the files names are generic and meaningless. That will require you to rename them as you go along. Passion HD certainly merits a recommendation with a couple of caveats. On the plus side the site has some of the freshest models in the business and it’s a large and growing site. The downsides are that the video quality isn't up to what the competition offers. But if you’re looking for some mainstream porn with some hot models you owe it to yourself to at least consider a membership here. And a TBP discount certainly doesn’t hurt! (I should note that once I had joined I was given an offer to add on several other sites for approximately $60USD which gave me an annual membership to each of them. The sites are Casting Couch X, Exotic4K, Fantasy HD, Lubed, My Very First Time, POVD, Pure Mature and Tiny 4K. That price for annual memberships seems like a good deal but they may not offer it all the time.) 11-07-16  04:41pm Replies (4) Review 192 Pegas Productions (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Stunning Quebec models - A true network with niche sites - Large site - Excellent outdoor nudity/sex site - Supports download managers - Updates regularly Cons: - Outdated scene bitrates - Some of the updates are streaming only - Server constantly stopped responding and required logging in again - Dialogue is in French only (but that really doesn’t detract from the scenes) Bottom Line: I’m aware that Quebec has a homegrown porn industry but I’ve never really gone looking for any Quebec porn until I saw this site listed on TBP. The site is what I would consider to be a true network in that there are 13 sites serving some distinct niches. I contrast this with other sites that sell themselves as a network but have ‘sites’ that are all basically the same. The sites (with current number of videos) are: • 3Way Porn: 43 • Blow me POV: 17 • Cutie Pussies: 29 (solo) • Fresh and Innocent: 39 • Fun Size Teen: 14 • Just Eden: 37 (billed as an X-Art style site) • Let's Fuck Outside: 37 • Lezzie BFF: 46 • Nasty Rookies: 27 (auditions) • Samantha Ardente: 11 • Shake the Snake: 66 (no specific niche) • Spice My Sex Life: 14 (mild kink) • Straight in the Ass: 15 The number of videos I’ve listed is less than what the TBP page lists because many of the videos are listed on an ‘updates’ page that has some unreleased stuff and some bloopers mixed in. I have no idea why the site doesn’t add the unreleased scenes to an existing site and create a separate bloopers page. I did find a lot of scenes on the update page that were streaming only. Depending on the age of the scene the file resolution can be fairly low. I’ve seen as low as 640x480. The newer stuff is available for mobile devices and in 1280x720. The real flaw is that the bitrates are quite low. The newest scenes are 2500kb/s which is far less than what other sites are using and it shows. There are scenes with bitrates as low as 1400. It’s possible that all of the material is quite old and they’re just slowly releasing it on the internet. There are some indications that this could be exactly what’s going on. The site adds a new scene every two days. While that sounds great, consider that the August 30 update is a three-minute, streaming-only video. To make matters worse, the thumbnail shows it as a public nudity scene but none of that footage is in the upload. The site allows download managers. Download speeds are quite fast. I want to single out one site for specific mention. I’m a big fan of outdoor scenes and a big fan of public nudity so I was happy to see a site that catered to this. What I wasn’t expecting was how over-the-top some of the scenes are. Many of the scenes are far in excess of American public nudity sites and even surpass many European sites. One scene is shot in a busy commercial area in Quebec City on a stairwell with full nudity. The scene is shot at dusk but this is a well-known and heavily travelled tourist area so this was pretty risky. Another, perhaps even more risky scene, is shot on the boardwalk at the Quebec City harbour next door to the iconic Frontenac hotel. Full nudity happens here too. And these aren’t short scenes either. Still another is recorded with a couple in the back of a horse-drawn carriage through old Quebec City on a busy day. This isn’t as risky because there are lots of people around but there is some oral sex, nudity and fingering. All three of these scenes are with the Quebec model named Candy Kiss who is young and beautiful. She has many scenes on this specific site. The other models who do risky outdoor public scenes are hot too. If you share my love of these kinds of scenes you really should consider a membership here regardless of some of the flaws. The only stuff I’ve seen that comes close are the European scenes at Public Disgrace. The scenes here at Pegas aren’t BDSM though; they’re a lot more playful than the PD scenes. The site appears to have an annoying technical flaw. Every time (and I mean EVERY TIME) I downloaded a few videos the server would stop responding and I’d have to leave the site, go back to it and log in again. I tried different browsers and the problem was the same. I don’t know if the site times out or if it’s just a flaw, but if you join I hope you don’t have the same issue. Many of the models here are really beautiful, though that shouldn’t be a surprise since Quebec women are known for this trait. Some of these models could have easily been A-list models in the U.S. In a vast majority of the scenes the interaction between the models is in French. For those with no exposure to the language you may not like this. Some newer scenes have a download option with subtitles. So do I recommend this network? I do, but I also have some reservations in that while a lot of the porn is really hot and features some stunning models, the site itself leaves a lot to be desired. I’m often left wondering why studios put so much effort into making great porn and then sell it to customers in resolutions that are far out of date. If, however, you’re a fan of risky outdoor sex in public places then my recommendation goes way up. Let's Fuck Outside offers some amazing stuff in this rare niche. And at $25 it’s a good value and worth having a look at. 08-31-15  04:51pm Replies (2) Review 193 Penthouse (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Multiple video download options - Huge site with diverse models - Good mix of softcore and hardcore - Mix of porn stars and ‘lesser knowns’ - Photos of all Monthly Pets back to 1973 - 3700+ photo galleries - 2200+ video scenes - Full length movies available (340+) - Access to Penthouse Forum and Variations - Some videos are available in 3D Cons: - Download speeds can vary and sometimes can be a bit slower than average - Links time out after 10 minutes or so - Video scenes stream automatically on opening page - Picture galleries tend to be small (less than 50 photos is common) - Some pictures appear to be airbrushed - Even on HD many of the videos don’t look great Bottom Line: I find that if I join a studio site I’m best served if I go in with low expectations. That way I’m not too disappointed when the site barely meets what I expected. But I have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised at how good a site Penthouse is. This is a very well done adult site. Penthouse likely needs no introduction to anyone reading this review. The magazine was my introduction to adult stuff back in 1980. The site is much more than the magazine though because the Penthouse empire has grown to include softcore and hardcore videos. The site gives access to a huge amount of PH material and all of it is very good quality. There is a search function but I didn’t use it much since the site is so well organized. There are links to sort material by porn stars (which gives you access to all the photos and videos with those models) and Pets (which again is an easy way to access photos and videos). If you’re looking for specific themes in videos the video scenes are tagged with the most common themes. Finding them is as easy as using the pull-down menu. PH does a disservice to itself by not allowing prospective members the opportunity to get a good idea of what the site has to offer. I can’t see what harm it can do to any site to allow non-members the ability to see what’s on offer. (It was mentioned here on an earlier comment and it still happens: when you go to join the offer is for a free membership. It’s only when you click through the non-existent free membership that you have to enter payment information. Most porn buyers are sophisticated to know that they have to pay to get access to a site like this so why hide behind a trick that fell out of favour years ago?) Most models have pictures and videos available. PH has certainly become more hardcore in the past decade, but there is a good amount of soft stuff too. Video downloads are available in a wide array of formats and sizes. MP4 HD, WMV HD, MP4, MPEG, Mobile and WMV SD are all offered on most scenes. I downloaded WMV HD and SD. HD came in at 1280x720 8000+ kb/s 24fps. SD is 768x432 3200+ kb/s 24fps. Both use WMV Codec 8. Subjectively, the videos don’t look that great even though the numbers would suggest otherwise. Huge pet peeve of mine with this site (which is becoming more common too) is that when you open a link to a scene the scene starts to stream immediately. If you have your speakers on this can be a problem, but what I dislike about it is that it hogs bandwidth for something that I don’t want. To make matters worse with PH is that the scene continues to download even after you pause it. I open scenes I want in new tabs and wondered why my download speeds were so slow until I realized that most of my bandwidth was being sucked up loading streams for scenes that I was going to download. Webmasters: please stop doing this!!! Apart from offering scenes with various porn stars and Pets, PH also offers about 340 full length DVDs. These are mostly PH-produced with a lot of Jill Kelly Productions thrown in the mix too. The problem with the full length videos is that they are full length. They are broken up into approximately 3-minute clips but those clips don’t necessarily begin and end with the one scene you want to see. With many of the titles added 5+ years ago there are no star names associated with them but many of the titles are listed on IAFD so you can get that information. Photos are available in multiple resolutions, listed as being small, medium, large, extra large and extra extra large (no actual resolution sizes were listed). I downloaded the extra extra large and they came in at 2667x4000. Subjectively they look great. One beef I had with the zipped sets is that many (likely most) that I downloaded were buried six folders deep before you got to the pics. I’m not a big photo collector but I always take the opportunity to get photos of favourite models. It was going through some of these photos that I realized that some of them have been airbrushed. I noticed this when I was looking at a high res photo of Faye Reagan and realized that they airbrushed out her anus. I know she doesn’t do anal, but I’m pretty sure she has an anus. Websites: please don’t doctor the photos! The absolute bottom line? I really liked this site. PH is synonymous with stunning women and great photographers and the site carries on that tradition. PH has branched out into hardcore to follow the money, but there is a lot here for most people to like. There are models of different ages and body types and there’s hardcore, softcore and solo. And given the amount of older PH photos there’s also lots of hair for guys who remember those days. I’d definitely recommend giving PH a try. 03-05-12  04:30pm Replies (14) Review 194 Perfect Gonzo (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Collection of 10 sites - Large collection (1600+ scenes) - HD available on many scenes - Good use of niche tags - Supports download managers - Updates by adding one scene to the network every three or four days - Screenshots and photos available Cons: - Scenes can get a bit repetitive Bottom Line: Perfect Gonzo is a collection of ten sites grouped around the main page. While it may be considered a true network because each of the sites serves a clear and distinct niche, all of the scenes are available through the main page too so that means that the sites themselves can act as high-level niche tags to quickly sort in or out preferences or dislikes. The sites available (with some basic details) are: All Internal: 322 scenes, featuring vaginal and anal creampies Ass Traffic: 314 scenes, featuring anal sex Cum for Cover: 82 scenes, featuring blowbangs with facials Fist Flush 68 scenes with fisting (for those with an interest, all of the scenes are g/g only, with some g/g/g and only about 10% of the scenes have any anal fisting) Give me Pink: 259 scenes, featuring solo masturbation MILF Thing: 59 scenes, with MILFs obviously Prime Cups: 158 scenes for large-breast fans Pure POV: 70 POV scenes Sperm Swap: 189 cum-swapping scenes Tamed Teens: 127 scenes with 18 and 19 year old models Each scene is accessible through a medium-sized thumbnail showing the model’s face. That thumbnail opens into a separate page that has tabs for the full scene, screenshots, photos and a trailer. There is a short description of the scene, a hyperlink to other scenes by that model and a series of (hyperlinked) tags for niches in the scene. Members have an opportunity to leave comments and some of those may be useful in deciding if you want to see the scene. Screenshots and photos are available as singles and zips. For video, HD is offered on approximately 70% of the scenes. Where HD is offered there are four choices for downloads, all of which are in mp4 format: 1920x1080 (12Mbit), 1280x720 (5Mbit), 960x540 (2.5Mbit) and 480x270 (1Mbit). File sizes are given before you download so you can decide on which version you want with all the information you need. File sizes for the highest resolution can be a bit daunting, but I appreciate that the site makes them available. I downloaded the 1280x720 resolution and subjectively they look great. Where no HD is available, only the two lower res files are offered. One important point is that the site only began putting the upload date on scenes in July 2013. That makes gathering a lot of stats difficult. What that does reveal is that several of the sites haven’t updated since the dates began being added. These include Cum for Cover, MILF Thing, Pure POV, Sperm Swap and Tamed Teens. What that also means is that when I say 70% of the scenes on the network are available in HD that doesn’t mean that 70% on the sites that are no longer updating are HD. All of the scenes have high production values with the lighting, filming, editing, etc. all being top quality. All of the models are European with many being well known in the adult business. The network is updated every three to four days with one scene being added to the network, not to each updating site. The site supports the use of download managers and if the links time out they do so reasonably because I had no problems with that. One thing prospective members should be aware of is that there’s a lot of anal sex here. For me, that’s no problem. In fact, it’s why I joined. Ass Traffic is all anal, but there are a lot of other anal scenes throughout the rest of the sites. I realize that this next point is subjective, but I found the scenes to be a bit repetitive and sometimes a bit boring. I know this is gonzo, and I know that this means a particular style, but I found that many of the scenes lacked heat. My opinion is that heat is most often formed by sexual tension, and that tension is best built at the beginning of the scene. Most of the scenes here are shot with little interaction between the models before they get down to business. Gonzo can have great set-ups that build tension and heat; just ask John Stagliano. It may be that since many of the models have little English that lessens the ability to create sexual tension. And this is not to take away from the scenes because they are great. (And in fairness, I find directors like Mike Adriano and Jay Sin to be repetitive too, but I still buy and download anything I can that they produce.) The bottom line for me is a bit of a mix. I can definitely recommend that anyone with an interest in the network join. The network has the three things that I think differentiate a great site from a merely good one: they have great porn (hot models and high production values), they have a well-laid-out website and the porn is easy to stream or download. The network offers over 1,600 scenes, many in HD, for a fair price. The volume of high quality porn for a reasonable price makes this a great value. The difference for me is that while I recommend that people join, I likely won’t be back myself, but the reasons for that are purely subjective and shouldn’t be taken into account unless your preferences are like mine. 11-26-13  03:35pm Replies (7) Review 195 Perv City (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 300 scenes - 30+ are exclusive to this site - Supports download managers (but links time out in 10-15 minutes) - High production values - Top models in the business - Not misogynistic, the models are obviously having fun - Tons of ass play and anal sex Cons: - Very large file sizes - Some may see his work as repetitive, formulaic - 90% of the scenes here aren't exclusive - Scene links time out (10-15 minutes) Bottom Line: Most readers here will know Mike Adriano’s work and those who do will either have a solidly pro or con opinion of it. He’s not polarizing because his work is like Max Hardcore, because it certainly isn’t, but his work isn't for everyone. For those who don’t know Adriano’s work, it’s fair to say that he has a signature look and feel to his scenes. Most of his scenes are shot in a combination of an outdoor setup and an indoor room. He only shoots the biggest stars in the business, and his scenes all have a definite ass theme to them. Even those rare Adriano scenes that don’t feature anal sex are still ass-focused. Other things you’ll see a lot of are sloppy blowjobs, lots of drool, ball-licking, male-on-female rimming, many scenes have female-on-male rimming and tons of anal sex. It’s important to note that while some sites could treat these sex acts in a way that was degrading to the female models that doesn’t happen here. There is no hint of D/s or misogyny here; the models really look to be having fun and Mike Adriano is truly an ass worshipper. Some may find fault that most of his scenes follow a formula but my thought is that since he found a formula that works there’s nothing wrong with sticking to it. The site is broken down into five ‘sites’ – Anal Overdose, Chocolate BJs, Oral Overdose, Banging Beauties, Up Her Asshole – but the main site has all the scenes. The sub-sites are great as filters but don’t go into this thinking you’re getting access to several distinct sites. There are currently about 300 scenes available but a prospective member needs to know that only about 30 of these are exclusive. Adriano is a prolific director and performer and is one of the leading directors at Evil Angel. He also shoots for Bang Bros. A member here will find a lot of the same EA scenes on this site too. The good news is that this lack of exclusivity is factored into the price. In my opinion the price of the membership is fair even if all you want are the exclusive scenes. Each scene opens into a separate page with only one option to stream and three download options, all of which are MP4: 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 704x480. I’m not sure how they’re encoded but the file sizes are a lot larger than I’m used to seeing for similar specs. The 720p files are all around 3GB each and the 1080p files can top out at more than 5GB. The file sizes may be an issue for some users but given the quality of the porn I didn’t find it an issue. The file sizes may also be a reflection of the fact that most of the scenes are near an hour long and many are over an hour long. The site supports download managers but the links do time out after 10 or 15 minutes. The download speeds varied from okay to great, but given the size of many of the files it wasn’t possible to queue up more than two or three 720p scenes at a time. The site updates with a new scene being added approximately every three days. An important point, however, is that only one exclusive scene is added per month. I didn’t look all that hard, but if there are photos on the site they aren't obvious. It’s fair to say that Adriano’s work is geared to video collectors anyway. The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that is definitely worth joining. If you like high-quality videos of the top names in the business doing some nasty things and enjoying it, then this site is for you. If you’re already a Mike Adriano fan you just need to be aware that 90% of the scenes here are available elsewhere, mostly on Evil Angel. But if you are truly a Mike Adriano fan the membership fee is still worth it for the exclusive scenes. 05-23-15  09:32am Replies (4) Review 196 Petite Ballerinas Fucked (0) 88.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Rare niche - A-list models - Models from the U.S. and EE/Russia - Updates regularly - Part of a great network - Many streaming and download options - Pictures and screenshots available - Tags to help sort scenes - Allows download managers - Good download speeds - ‘Soft’ hardcore - TBP discount Cons: - Search function isn't fully functional (this is a very minor con) Bottom Line: Petite Ballerinas Fucked is a relatively new site added to the Nubiles Porn network, having launched in September 2015. The site remains relatively small and will take time to grow as it only adds one new scene per month. While that doesn’t sound great, consider that PBF is part of a network that offers a total of 11 sites with seven of those still active and updating. (On a related note, I mourned the death of both Nubiles Casting and Driver XXX in a comment here earlier this month and the webmaster replied that these sites are on a bit of a vacation and that the network is hoping to reactivate them in the near future. That’s great news.) If you can say only one positive thing about this site it’s that the title isn't misleading. If the title were anything else I’d have described the site as one where petite ballerinas get fucked. But the truth is that there are plenty of other good things to say about this site. The scene set-ups aren't particularly complex. In fact, they’re downright simple: a young, petite woman in a ballerina outfit shows some simple ballet moves and then the male talent walks in and they start to have sex. Sure, it is a bit more involved than that in some scenes but there aren't scenes with complex plots here. The scenes skew to the softer end of the hardcore spectrum. If you’re looking for throat-fucking and relentless pounding you won’t find it here. What you will find is some hot porn where the sensuality is turned up. In keeping with the softer nature of the scenes there is lots of kissing and the men perform oral on the women as foreplay. There is no anal sex. Also, none (that I found anyway) of the come shots were facials. I don’t know what constitutes ‘couples-friendly’ porn, but this has to at least come close. In keeping with the ballerina theme, many of the scenes have the models keeping their outfit on for an extended time and using the bar as a prop for both foreplay and sex. The scenes are also a natural length with the average being around 20 minutes. In keeping with the softer edge of the site these aren't 90 minute marathon sessions. The technical aspects of the scenes are all well done too. The sound, lighting and editing are all top quality, which adds to the overall feel to the site. One feature that indicates to me that the directors understand their primary audience is that the women are clearly the stars. The men are all attractive (which may contribute to making the site couples-friendly) but the men obviously understand that the scenes are about the women and the men do their best to help the women stay as the centre of the scene. Speaking of the women here, the site is a who’s who of many A-list models from both sides of the Atlantic. If I had to pick one feature that makes this site a real stand-out it has to be that the women are exceptionally beautiful, though admittedly these models are also the exact look and body type I prefer. (As I said above, the site has to get some of the credit for recognizing that the women need to be the centre of the scenes.) There are currently 33 scenes available spread over three main pages. Clicking on a scene opens it and provides you with many options. Streaming is available in five resolutions: 1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360 and 480x270. To the site’s credit, the streaming doesn’t begin automatically as soon as you open the page. Downloads are available in mp4 format in the same five resolutions as the streamed scenes. There is also one WMV download in 1280x720. I downloaded the 1920x1080 files and found a wide variation in bitrates, from 5800kbps to 18000kbps. I couldn’t tell that there was a discernable difference with the files on a 24” monitor. They all look good. Photos are available as singles or zips and come in your choice of resolutions: 5760x 3840, 2000x1333 and 1200x800. Screenshots are available too but only in 1920x1080. No member can reasonably complain that there isn't some format to their liking. I used a download manager to queue scenes and had no issues doing that. I had no problem with links timing out. Finally, the download speeds were on par with the best sites I’ve subscribed to recently. The technical aspects of the site are all well done too. The site is logically laid out and easy to use. Each scene has a series of tags defining the popular porn niches. There is a search function and it does work, but it searches the entire network rather than the site you’re on. That’s certainly not a deal-breaker. The bottom line is that this is a great site serving a rare niche that is part of a great network. The icing on the cake is that the site offers a TBP/PU discount. I’d recommend this site if it were a stand-alone site (with more updates though…) but since it is part of a great network I highly recommend that you check it out. 08-21-17  03:18pm Replies (2) Review 197 Petite HD Porn (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A great site in an under-served niche - A-list models - Part of the Nubiles.net network - 85 exclusive scenes - Streaming and downloads - Lots of download options - Photos available in multiple resolutions Cons: - Nothing without sounding petty Bottom Line: I’m not sure how I missed this being listed as a new site at TBP back 18 months ago as this is something I should have noticed. The ‘petite’ niche a favorite of mine and since this is part of the Nubiles.net family I had a lot of confidence in joining knowing that Nubiles makes some great porn and of the many times I’ve joined there I’ve always been a satisfied customer. Given the name of the site it isn't hard to figure out that they feature some of the more petite models in the industry. When the site first launched in late 2013 they featured mostly European and Russian models but fairly quickly moved to featuring more American models. I’m not biased against European and Russian models but porn is a lot about ‘collecting’ for me and since so many European and Russian models seem to work under multiple stage names it’s harder to collect scenes from my favorites. The site is a who’s who of petite models. Dakota (or Kota) Skye, Emily Grey, Halle Von, Mary Jane Johnson, Riley Reid and Sarah Luvv all have scenes here. (And if you’ll allow a moment of obvious subjectivity, there’s a Dakota Skye scene that will likely make it to my all-time favorite scenes list.) Apart from using petite models there is no common theme in the scenes. Most of the scene set-ups are fairly standard. The site currently has 85 exclusive scenes uploaded. The site doesn’t update on a regular schedule, but it definitely is updating. Some weeks there can be two or three updates and then the site goes two weeks without one. The site offers streaming but I don’t use that so I really can’t comment. Downloads are available in five MP4 resolutions (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and in WMV format at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and those have a bitrate of 4500kb/s and a framerate of 59fps. Those are better specs than I see at many similar sites but I’ve learned to expect Nubiles to be better than most sites. Subjectively the scenes look great and I recommend that if you normally download only the highest resolution try the 1280x720 because you may be happy and save some disk space. As with other Nubiles sites photos aren't just an afterthought. Photos are available as singles or in a zip. There are three zipped options: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800. The site supports download managers. I had no issue with the links timing out but part of that could be attributed to the download speeds being very fast. There really aren't any serious negatives to mention here. The only one that I can think of is that when I selected for anal scenes using the anal tag, some of the scenes had no anal sex in them. That’s hardly a deal-breaker. (For the record, there are about eight anal scenes here, one being the above-mentioned scene with Dakota Skye.) I definitely recommend this site for anyone who likes petite models. You’ll get access to the A-list of petite models in some well-shot and edited scenes. You’ll have lots of options to download the scenes too. If this were a stand-alone site I might think that it is a good, but not great, value, but since it’s part of the Nubiles.net family it is definitely a great value even at full price. 05-25-15  03:22pm Replies (0) Review 198 Pissing.com (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 31 scenes - Mix of girl/girl and boy/girl - Typical Kink quality - Good mix of porn stars and relative unknowns - Videos available in multiple formats - Photos available (singles and zips) Cons: - Only 31 scenes - No longer updating - No clear indication that the site isn’t updating - Doesn’t have the same BDSM feel that other Kink sites have - Price is a little high for a small site that doesn’t update Bottom Line: The ‘streaming’ videos on this site are excellent. Okay, okay, I’ll try to keep the pee jokes to a minimum here. I know there are mixed thoughts here about sites that are no longer updating. Jpg386’s comment on this page certainly captures the view that a lot of PU members have on the topic. I’m with the members who think that whether a site is updating or not is just one factor in the value equation. The site is part of the Kink.com family of sites and as such it is offered as a stand-alone site so a membership here does not give you access to any other Kink sites. Being part of the Kink network the scenes are well shot with lighting, sound and editing all being in the top tier of adult sites. Whoever manages the technical stuff sure is a real whiz. (Sorry, I couldn’t help myself…) What certainly helps too is the female talent. There are many well-known porn stars on the site, such as Amber Rayne, Flower Tucci and Annie Cruz, and there are also a lot of lesser-known models. Many of these lesser-known models (to me, anyway) also appear on other Kink sites so I presume that they’re more known as fetish models rather than mainstream stars. The site is relatively small, offering only 31 shoots. The shoots are shorter in duration then most other Kink offerings, most being less than 30 minutes long. That certainly starts to move the value marker to making this a less than great value. Some of the scenes have a bit of a set-up where the models play a role, and others have no set up and just have people peeing on a woman. The one constant is that the scenes aren’t a peeing free-for-all: there is usually one female model who is the receiver. Having one ‘submissive’ model is really the only link that the site has with the BDSM roots of the Kink family tree. People looking for hardcore BDSM with peeing probably won’t find what they’re looking for here. Neither will people who want to see women peeing on men, because most Kink sites have dominant men and submissive women and that remains true here. Jpg386 commented that the site features “mostly a bunch of lesbo scenes where laughing girls pee on each other.” I don’t agree with that in that of the 31 scenes on the site only six are all-girl. The comment is correct, though, in that the mood in the scenes tends to be a lot lighter and less menacing than on other Kink sites. I’m not really sure why the director opted to be less BDSM-themed; it may be that Kink figured that the site was pushing the legal limits as it was and adding in a BDSM element might make the religious right go nuts. Or more nuts, I guess. Being a Kink site, the technical stuff is well done. Each scene offers a trailer, photos and video. Video is available as a stream or downloadable as a WMV (HD), WMV, MP4 (HD) and in sizes for mobile devices. I downloaded the WMV HD scenes and they come in at 1280x720 at 7200kb/s and 30fps. They’re in Codec 9. Subjectively they look great. The photos are available in two resolutions (800x533 and 1200x800). They’re available as singles or zipped. While these resolutions aren’t great, you have to consider that the most recent ones were shot at least three years ago when these would have been excellent quality. Which leads me to the biggest negative of the site… Pissing.com is no longer updating and hasn’t added a new scene in about three years. I can understand that a site may stop updating and I’m not going to fault a site owner for making a business decision to stop shooting for a site, but I do wish that Kink was a bit more open about the fact that the site is no longer active. Back when Kink stopped shooting for Water Bondage they had a disclaimer that the site was no longer updating (but it seems that they’re trying to revive it). Eventually that disclaimer was removed. Same for Pissing.com. To make matters worse, Kink stopped listing the dates of the shoots so it is almost impossible for a prospective member to know that the site is no longer adding new material. This seems strange for a company that otherwise does everything else right and has a reputation for treating their customers well. So is the site worth a look? I think so, but a person should consider the value for themselves. I’ve had memberships at similar themed sites before and can say that the Kink way of doing things means that Pissing.com is pretty much the number one site for number one. (Sorry again… that’ll be the last joke.) There are 31 great scenes that look good and are available in most ways a member would want them. I do hope that they’ll reactivate the site some day, and until then I do wish they’d be more open about the site’s status. Until they start filming again, they should lower the price to better reflect the true value of a small, inactive site. But even with that caveat, if you like this niche, I’d recommend the site for sure. 03-31-12  11:03am Replies (4) Review 199 Pissing.com (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: • It’s a Kink.com site so it is backed a reputable company • Exclusive videos • Hardcore, but not misogynistic • Some very beautiful models and some interesting set-ups • Photos and videos, as well as a trailer for each shoot • Weekly updates (Tuesday) • Long videos – most are around 30 minutes • No DRM • Zips available for the pictures and videos • Fast downloads (I average 350+ kb/sec – that’s at least 100kb/sec faster than I get with Videobox) Cons: • Site is still small because it is new, but it updates weekly • No options for file sizes Bottom Line: Pissing.com is the latest offering from Kink.com. If you like fetish videos, then you probably already know Kink. Kink is probably the premier fetish site on the web today. (I say “probably” only because I don’t know of any company that does it better.) The set-ups are pretty much the same – the girl starts clothed, and in most cases she starts the peeing by doing it herself. Then one or more guys come in to add to the fun. Pissing.com is different from other sites that I know of that feature peeing. Max Hardcore does pissing as part of a rough sex scene, unlike Pissing.com which makes pissing the sole focus. The only other site where I’ve had a membership is Piss Mops, which is part of the Meat Members group. Like Max, Piss Mops is pretty misogynistic, and that would be a turn off for lot of fans who are just into watersports and not seeing women degraded. I know this sounds strange, but Pissing.com doesn’t degrade the women. The women seem to be willing and eager participants. Another benefit of pissing.com is that since pissing is the whole focus, the videos are long for this genre. The average video is probably 30 minutes long. This is good, but the trade-off is that the models don’t get a real hosing off. Most times the pisser takes his time. Since I labeled the pissers as male above, that raises an issue that some people may find fault with. The site is primarily male on female pissing. There is some female on female, but not much. I prefer male on female, but as the site grows, maybe those of you who like f-on-f will get more. File sizes for videos average 250MB and can be downloaded as a zip, though it still unzips into a number of smaller videos (usually 3 to 4). This is a great feature that is used throughout Kink sites. Photos are also available as a zip. There are no options for file sizes but the resolution is fairly good. The videos aren’t DVD quality, but they are still very good. The bit rate is 2140bps, with the screen resolution being 960x540. There is a small but unobtrusive watermark in the lower left corner. The site is new, so it isn’t too big right now, but the webmaster says that there will be weekly updates on Tuesdays. I have no doubt that this is the case as every other Kink site updates weekly. (To give full marks to Kink.com, when they stopped updating Water Bondage they informed everyone. Lesser sites would just stop and continue to collect money.) I know I might be accused of being a Kink.com shill, but apart from being a very satisfied customer I have no relationship with them. All of their sites are top quality – I’d go so far to say that they set the standard. If you like fetish stuff, check out Kink. I can report that they are also customer oriented too. I had a password problem (of my own making) with a membership to another Kink site and they responded to my email in less then 24 hours and they recommended and implemented a quick and easy solution. 11-28-08  04:33pm Replies (1) Review 200 Playboy.tv (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Playboy quality models - Mostly natural models - Good mix of niches and themes - Many download options - Mostly soft content (some hardcore) - Photos available - Allows download managers - TBP discount Cons: - Models are uncredited - Bitrates are too low - Username and password are randomly assigned - Wide variation in video quality even within a series - Photos don’t seem to have a zip option Bottom Line: Before I weigh in on this review it might help if the reader knows that while I’m familiar with the Playboy brand and magazine I’m not familiar with any Playboy videos or any Playboy channel. This is obviously Playboy-produced stuff, but I don’t know if this is run on the Playboy channel or if this is web exclusive. Being affiliated with Playboy would suggest high-quality content and that is what you’ll find here. Locations are great and production quality is great. Being part of the Playboy brand means that most of the models are beautiful. You will find some fake breasts and tattoos but most of the models are natural. I don’t think I need to explain to any reader what Playboy models look like: that’s what you’ll find here. One problem I found is that in most cases the models aren't credited within any scenes. If you find a model you like good luck identifying her. If you do identify her through, you will be able to source more of her stuff through her model page. The site gives you access to 92 different ‘shows.’ These range from casting shoots, spring break stuff, strip club stuff to some hardcore material. There is a wide range of niches available. Within each of these ‘shows’ there may be multiple seasons and within each season there are multiple episodes. Given that variation I can’t give an accurate number of how many individual scenes there are but I can say with confidence that this site does have a lot of quantity to offer. The site is well-organized and it’s easy to find something you’ll be interested in. There is a search function but I didn’t find it to be very useful. But since the site is laid out so well there really isn't a need for much of a search function. Being able to sort by shows and models gives a lot of functionality. Something I didn’t expect (but probably should have) is that many of the ‘shows’ follow a reality-TV format. I downloaded and watched two series’ that featured strippers and strip clubs. I’m a fan of this niche and was expecting a lot of stripping. There is some of that but most of the series focused on the drama among strippers and between management and the strippers than any actual stripping. This is also the case for most of the other shows too. There is some hardcore on offer but it is best to think of this as a softcore site with a little hardcore thrown in. Don’t join expecting Playboy-quality models in hardcore scenes because you’ll end up disappointed. Probably the biggest flaw in the site is the video quality. Most videos are offered in multiple resolutions (with MP4 being the only format) but the focus is on the lower end of the scale rather than the upper end of the scale. Resolutions of 272p, 320p, 368p and 480p are offered with most videos. I may be missing the point here, but it seems to me that offering both 320p and 368p is a bit pointless. If you’re viewing on a phone would there really be that much difference between those two files? The upper end of the scale isn't as well served. On many files the best you can get is 720p. Those come in at 1280x720 which isn't bad but they’re let down by a bitrate of only 2500kb/s so they look pixilated on even a 24” monitor. Some scenes are offered in 720p with a higher bitrate of 4000kb/s but even that is low by today’s standards. Some, but not many, files are available in 1920x1280 with a 6000kb/s bitrate – again, that’s low and should be improved. One thing I found both odd and frustrating was that within a ‘season’ of a show there were variances in the resolutions available. Episode 1 might offer both 720p bitrates and the 1080p while Episode 2 only offers the low-bitrate 720p file as the highest quality. Presumably these scenes were shot and uploaded around the same time so this variance is baffling. Photos are available but they appear to be screenshots. If there is a way to download the photos as a zip I couldn’t find it. The photos are 1920x1080 but I found the few I downloaded to be fuzzy but that may be intended. I used a download manager to queue-up files and didn’t experience any problems. The download speeds were average. I didn’t experience any limits or caps. There is a TBP discount offered but make sure you select that as the annual membership is the default. A final beef I have with the site is that it randomly assigns a username and password and these are just a random uses of letters and numbers so they aren't likely to be memorized. Further, when you sign in you can select the ‘remember me’ option but that doesn’t work. I recommend the site as long as any member goes in knowing what they’re getting. Think of this as reality TV with some extra spice thrown in and a bit of hardcore for good measure. The site has a lot to offer but could be greatly improved by offering better bitrates as the ones they offer now are too low. Having a TBP discount makes this site a great value but be careful to make sure you select that option. 11-01-15  08:41am Replies (0) Shown : 176-200 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.55 seconds.