Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Sex Art
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
1)Stunning models
2)Well-directed sex scenes (almost cinematic)
3)HD content (though low-bitrate)
4)Regular updates |
| Cons: |
1)Low-bitrate content (despite being HD resolution)
2)Site navigation is a bit confusing at first |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has stunning models and great video directing. They look almost cinematic. Really quite an attractive site. However, I can't bring myself to staying with them.
To me, the biggest disappointment with SexArt is its video bitrate. This could have been right up there with my favorite sites (e.g. X-Art, Nubile Films), but instead, I couldn't wait to leave. While all videos are HD resolution (1080p), the low bitrate encoding makes them look choppy or too soft. If they'd only raise the bitrate to at least 7000K, then I'd go back in a heartbeat.
As it stands, I'd rather spend my money elsewhere. I'd still recommend it if you only want to go in for the pictures of the models, or you don't mind the low bitrate encoding. |
|
12-17-13 06:01pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
2
|
X-Art
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1)Really hot girls
2)HD videos + pics with nice posing & directing
3)Video bitrates are among the best that I've experienced
4) Easy downloads
5) Regular updates |
| Cons: |
1) Could use more variations in girls' bodytypes
2) Slight decrease in recent video quality/bitrate (avg. now 7-8000K, before 8-9000K) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is probably my favorite go-to site for what I'd like to refer to as "artistic porn". With really attractive, young-looking ladies with soft, petite bodies, X-Art provides a nice balance between hardcore action & art. There is a nice mixture of hardcore & softcore sets that can satiate whatever you're in the mood for. Video quality has taken a slight dip in recent months (they seem to have downgraded the bitrate slightly or have switched to another post-processing method), but they're still top-notch compared to others in the industry. I highly recommend this site if you're into the genre. |
|
12-17-13 02:10pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
3
|
Body In Mind
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
(*)Very attractive, classy-looking ladies
(*)Extra large resolution photos (for recent sets)
(*)No over-the-top post-processing (may not be a positive for some, but suits my tastes) |
| Cons: |
(*)Unadvertised 3GB 24 hour download limit, cannot even log into the site once you exceed it
(*)Unadvertised LARGE format-only (i.e. no EXTRA) ZIP downloads
(*)Slightly tedious ZIP download process (have to agree to never share)
(*)Softness in a lot of photo sets
(*)Photo sets from before 2009 can have the photos chopped up into separate images to prevent you from downloading the entire image
(*) Site can be slow |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I was both intrigued and disappointed by this site. It features some of the most attractive ladies that I've seen to date, and generally the style suits my tastes greatly (no over photoshopping, no harsh lighting, etc.) But the downsides simply outweigh the pluses for me. For starters, the advertised EXTRA LARGE resolution is NOT available for download in zip. You can certainly open each of them in your browser and download manually, but that is quite cumbersome. Second, once you hit the 2008 and before sets, all those photos of all resolution are chopped up into 6 or more separate images, thereby preventing you from getting the EXTRA LARGE sizes manually. Also there is a 3GB per day quota that they don't tell you about until you hit it, and once you do you're locked out of the site for 24 hours. Not to mention that if you're downloading a few zips at the same time, the site slows down to a crawl. Lastly, the LARGE sizes are really quite pitiful, not even 1920px standard.
This is really disappointing as some of the hottest ladies grace this site, yet some of the best photo sets are pre-2009, meaning that I can't have them in resolutions sufficient for turning into HD wallpapers.
With increases in bandwidth, image resolutions in zip format, and also better lenses to reduce the softness of certain sets, this site could be a real gem. Pity. |
|
09-21-13 08:09pm
Replies (1)
|
|
