Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Alybator (0)

Feedback:   All (248)  |   Reviews (225)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (22) Other:   Replies Received (68)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 51-75 of 237 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 51 Anal Acrobats (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: The wonders of the incredibly elastic anus – showcased, for better or worse. There are 711 scenes with updates being inconsistent. While all of the females are not top-shelf in looks, most are at least attractive. Seeing women be this rough and kinky with each other. The lesbian scenes were a surprise for me. Most scenes go up to HD but less than 10 have 4K. The solo scenes are just behind the lesbian scenes in quality. Cons: Do not like the scenes with men. I really am straight. The scenes with men get too rough and Neanderthalic. Okay, new one for me, there are scenes that not only list it, but have it in the title, “farting”. Not trying to pick on men, but one of those is a scene with a man in it. Neanderthalic. Bottom Line: I had viewed a few scenes from this site before, but don’t think I realized how much it is a solo and lesbian site. There are 711 scenes, of those: 298 are listed as lesbian and 80 are listed as solo. I don’t know if it’s just the newer scenes have more emphasis on solo or lesbian and that’s what made me think this was just one of those males punish the female sites or not. Of the newest 60 scenes, only 7 have a man in them. There is a new update this month that has a man in it but would like this site a lot better if they stuck with the solo/lesbian theme. This site is not for those that are turned off by rough sex or prolapse. I can’t say I like those parts. It does go into my feeling of removing the males. If a woman is masturbating anally and does prolapse or it is doing it rough, it is not so bad, it’s a little worse if it is lesbian and it just becomes unwatchable if it’s a man causing the prolapse. It’s nothing more than I see it as being rough for the sake of being rough. I don’t have problems with regular anal sex between a male and female, but the gimmick of this particular site is the stretching, the gaping and I would rather just see the woman doing that herself. I’m still waiting on that site where we see how far a woman can pull a man’s dick. That’s a fair comparison! It looks like these guys are competing to see which can cause the most destruction. Some of the lesbian scenes are even erotic and passionate. That’s not what I was expecting. I have looked further back in the updates, and it does look like they changed the style from mostly men with women to solo and lesbian. I probably was a member when it was more of the men with women. I am not known to be turned away by hardcore sex. The solo scenes remind me more of a woman just testing her ability and pain tolerance. That’s why I would recommend the lesbian scenes over those. The solo can feature large dildos, vegetables, fruits and seems to focus on the woman pushing her limits. The lesbian scenes are more showing of emotions and feelings. Maybe there is trust developed and that helps? It seems to be common for me on this network to only like specific niches within each site. I don’t find many that make me like everything or even 75%. The video quality is very good. You get at worst 480p, but that is only on the oldest scenes which I wouldn’t recommend anyway. The majority of the scenes have HD (720p and/or 1080p) scenes. The photo sets are okay. I do think these are screen captures. Each set has near 200 in it and each is downloadable. Lesbian scenes, solo, scenes with men. In that order and it’s a good site. 01-12-22  08:30am Replies (0) Review 52 Lets Go Bi (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Bisexual men with a woman. It’s a niche that I like, but I do have believability problems with it. Similar to believability problems with solo women sites. There are 50 scenes. They update two times per month. Video quality is very good, it goes up to 4K. The site is easy to use and has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. Some of the female models are very attractive. That goes into the believability for me. Cons: You’re pushing my reality button when you put two young, handsome guys with a woman who is barely attractive. If the bisexual part was not included, how attractive the woman is wouldn’t matter as much. Some of this doesn’t make sense to me. There are guys wearing strapons. I know about men using bigger dildos as covers over their dick to please the wife more, but that is just different to me. They have a few scenes that bring voyeurism in for the woman. I think that helps, but it’s only a few scenes that do that. Bottom Line: I really didn’t know how I felt about this site. I like bisexual men sites. I have mental blocks that I have to get through. I will explain that. There is a porn series where a very beautiful woman is being pursued by a man. He finally reaches her, and she has a boyfriend. She tells him, if you want to fuck me, you have to fuck him (her boyfriend). I have heard of that being more common than we realize. I have to use that as a way for me to believe the two guys are not gay, but they are willing to go bisexual to get the beautiful woman. Some of the women on this site are the least attractive of the three. Which makes me think it is two gay men that are willing to add an unattractive women for pay. The site is not real big at 50 scenes. It is updating twice per month. I mentioned the voyeur possibility with a site like this one. One of the scenes has a pretty, young woman in a spa tub watching her boyfriend and another man give each other oral sex in the sauna. That is another way the bisexual men scenes work for me. I still do not understand the one with the guy wearing a strapon. To make that one more confusing, the really pretty woman also has a strapon. The one position that I like least in bisexual men porn is also one I don’t like in 2 transsexuals with a woman. That is one guy up the other guy’s butt while the other guy is in the woman’s pussy. That’s too much movement. It makes me motion sick trying to watch that. This site has some scenes I do like. There is one where one of the guys looks very young and he is topping the other guy. He is looking at the nude woman like he has never seen a nude woman. That could be another way to make me believe these men pass up the beautiful woman to slide in a hairy ass. The settings of these scenes are very nice. There are rolling hills, outdoors scenes. There are hotel bathrooms and maybe that is used to add some spontaneity. I think that would usually be the case. It just happened, we got lost in the moment. The scenes could be longer. This is one that really need subtitles. Some are speaking English, but it’s not the best English I have heard. Mine isn’t either. I know that subtitles would help a lot. This is the struggle I have with bisexual men porn. Most of the guys in the scenes give me the feeling they are gay men. That is me being complicated. Or complicating the scene. The site is good and if you don’t complicate like I do, it’s even better. I do believe I would like it more if the females were younger. The scenes with younger females on the site are my favorites. It’s another step in the right direction. There is room for improvement in the way the scenes are produced, casted and directed. 01-12-22  08:27am Replies (0) Review 53 Met Art X (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Pretty solo site that does a lot right but isn’t without some subjective flaws. I am not usually as into solo female porn as some, but this was offered in a promo, and I came away with a similar feeling I expected to have. The site is large and has a new update each day. The sites on the Met-Art Network release photos separate from videos and number them. Not for sure how I feel about this practice. There is some variety in models, but it’s not a lot. Most of these models are pretty, slim, white. Videos are unlimited downloadable and there are downloadable photo zips. Cons: Camerawork and music in scenes. The camerawork is a major one for me to be convinced of the models’ orgasm. This site unlike the other on this network that I just reviewed, splits the photos and videos up as separate updates but updates them on back-to-back days. Their other site spreads those out. Most of my complaints on this site are going to be from me believing the visuals of the woman’s pussy is crucial to seeing how it reacts to orgasm, the camerawork has problems there and some of the women also close their legs in what is supposed to be the orgasm. Bottom Line: I find myself highly critical of solo masturbation sites. One of my regular practices is teaching women to orgasm without physical stimulation. This requires contractions and teasing of the vaginal vestibule or introitus. This, likely is not something porn wants to talk about since it explains the absurdity behind “size matters”. Think of all those 12 inch dick unemployed men walking around with nothing more than a visual stimulant. These scenes are incredibly straightforward and do lack a lot of the creativity I would like to see in a solo female scene. Also, not all of the scenes include masturbation, which I thought was the point of this being Met Art X. A 22 minute scene of a woman dancing around nude does not constitute porn. It doesn’t even equal tease porn. It is more like watching a ballet or artistic performance. Once into the masturbation scenes, some have soft music, which doesn’t bother me as much as others. I know some feel this blocks out the moans and noises from the female, but you can hear those and the music is very soft. I watched numerous scenes that did this: Camera explicitly focused on the pussy as the woman masturbates, then as she starts to writhe, twist and look like an orgasm is nearing, the camera moves to a view of her from the side. I know this is explicit and maybe shows how much I am interested in the female orgasm, but I usually can watch the vaginal vestibule and tell when a woman is having an orgasm. A lot of these more glam sites choose to remove the camera from seeing that. I believe it hurts the scenes a lot. Several scenes I was very much into just lost me with the camera choosing to show the side view of the woman during what was supposed to be an orgasm. There is a reason male cumshot compilation videos are popular. Seeing another person, either gender, orgasm, can and often will bring on orgasm for the person viewing. This site would score much higher if they fixed that one part with the camera changing during orgasm. The site is large with 1,156 videos, 970 picture sets, only 345 models, but these do seem to be top-level models. I imagine they pull popular models from their other sites to this one. The update rate is very good and there are up to 4K downloads on the videos with 6 other options, also downloadable picture sets. For an overall good package. I made a comment over a year ago about not understanding why porn with tattooed models believed it had to be as violent and hardcore as possible. I will make a similar comment here. Why not show the explicit orgasm? If the model is okay with being videoed explicitly while masturbating, shouldn’t she be okay with showing her orgasm? I may even be being a little harsh with my score, but that camera movement during the orgasm ruins the scenes for me. 01-12-22  05:17am Replies (0) Review 54 The Life Erotic (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A unique site on a network (Met Art) that I typically do not think “unique” applies to. Updates every 4 days and is a large site. More solo than expected and that is what makes it interesting. Women practicing, trying kinky sex acts with themselves. The newer scenes have 4K and quality is very high on every aspect of the site. Navigation is good, clean layout, though there are a few ads I would knock off the screen. Cons: I feel this way about a lot of kinkier content. Some models seem to be made for it while others are not. There is some feeling of uncomfortableness from the models. Which does hurt scenes like these. I also am a member of Met Art X and there is a lot of similarity between the two with just the kinky act being the separating factor. Videos too short. Bottom Line: I joined this site on a promo and am glad I gave it a try. As a relative newcomer to the glam porn sites, I have a lot of preconceived notions about any sites that have the word “Art” in them or that are associated with sites with the word, “Art” in them. This site is associated with the Met-Art network. The size of the site was the first good surprise. There are 1,330 scenes/films, 2,879 picture sets and 1,247 models. They update every 4 days making the numbers go up relatively fast compared to other sites. The videos are very good which I wasn’t expecting either, but I will say, the shortened length of these videos is somewhat disappointing. Some are even split into parts. I don’t see the reason for the parts unless it’s just to get more content to look like more updates. But maybe that is just me. I have not been easy on other sites for using this same method. It would be unfair to do so here. A good example is a scene called, “Penis Practice”. It features Antonia Sainz and this scene has a part 1 and part 2. Part 1 was released in early November 2021, part 2 was released in late December 2021. It takes on a whole new level of confusion. Part 1 isn’t a video. It’s a picture set. Part 2 is a video. I thought it was standard these days for a scene to be released with photos and video. As small of a negative as that sounds like it just feels like a move to entice only to make you wait over a month to get the video. The good part is the scene is an interesting and sexy, even erotic show of a woman practicing how she will please a penis with her hand, mouth, pussy and that is a welcome change to most porn. I want to say that it’s the theme of this entire site. It is a look into each model’s life and how she explores her sexuality. If things were more cohesive that would make this even better (like not releasing pictures a month before the video). The majority of the scenes follow that one in style. One scene is a model testing her nipples sensitivity with pressure and if nothing else, I have to give them points for trying something different. The masturbation in the scenes does seem to be genuine and enjoyed. If you are into the pictures, the pictures are very high quality and available as zip downloads. The videos are unlimited downloads and come in 7 resolutions/formats with the last several years offering up to 4K. I’m very impressed with the content itself as the scenes themselves tell the story of what is going on. What I’m not impressed with is the lack of cohesiveness. If I download a photo set in November, but don’t get the video until 6 weeks later, I am going to forget what was going on in the photos. It seems their biggest strength could easily be their biggest weakness unless they start releasing those together. Still, it is recommended. I am enjoying the site a lot. 01-12-22  05:15am Replies (0) Review 55 Club Sweethearts (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Everything about it is innocent except the producer and cameraman! Incredibly large site with 7,197 videos and 10,309 picture sets There are 4,056 models forever stuck at 18 Good sorting and searching features including by series, niche and date Video quality goes up to 4K and downloads are unlimited. There are too many “cute” niches on here for a straight woman. I have avoided this type of porn for a reason! I have been a member on this network for several months and just looked at this site for the first time last week. Cons: If you’re a straight woman you may not feel like one after a membership here. Maybe it could be too cute to some. I don’t know if it’s fair to list overwhelming as a con. Bottom Line: I won’t explain my last pro anymore than is needed. I usually avoid this cute, teen, being innocently kinky porn. I never experienced anything like this, at that age, in India. It makes it something that intrigues me now and I’m old enough to be most of these models’ mom. Maybe some of you guys can explain how you deal with that? Does the “eww, I’m being creepy” feeling go away? The scenes are not as innocent as I expected. A lot of them are. The newest update might explain my concern and problem with this type of porn. The model, Rita Fox, looks to have some baby fat on her and is bent over, grabbing her ankles, while wearing a bikini. I looked away several times. The innocence of the scenes is lost just 4-5 scenes later when you see one of these innocent teens sucking a BBC like a pro. I still feel creepy. The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The older ones do decline as expected. The scenes cover a lot of different niches. I am admitting ignorance, I thought this type of site only had teasing and scenes to make me feel like a pervert. I still do, but these innocent models are no more innocent than the producer and cameraman. The picture sets add a lot. I have started looking at more pictures the last few months. I am starting to wonder if video killed the pornography star. If you know the song, it somehow made its way to India and was played 50 times a day. I am impressed by the variety. There is hardcore, softcore, lesbian, group, and the slumber parties. That creepy feeling is looking around the corner at me. I couldn’t believe the number of scenes at over 7,000 and over 10,000 picture sets. I just wish there was a way to make my own filter that would be titled, “Scenes that are like this one”. That is maybe the biggest con for me. This is overwhelming. I have found several scenes I really like, but there are thousands to go through to find more like it. Where is the “scenes like this one” when you need it? The solo scenes are even good and I usually don’t like solo female. I really think it has something to do with the site creating a taboo feeling in me. There are outdoor scenes too. Not for sure if that qualifies as exhibitionism. The group scenes are my current favorites. I didn’t know models this age performed in group scenes or even knew group sex was a thing. I need to get away from that BDSM content, the real fetishes are on sites like this. I can tie myself up. I can’t create a five 19 year old teens slumber party. I guess I could. This site is maybe getting me with the newness (to me) of it. I could take a vacation for a few weeks and not even get 1/10th of the way of through this site. If my feelings on it drop off after the newness wears off, I will adjust the score, but right now I’m thinking the score is very fair for all this content and quality of it. 12-08-21  08:45am Replies (1) Review 56 Lesbian Sistas (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Darker-skinned lesbians that I believe include Latinas and possibly women from India. While the site isn’t a large site with 78 videos, this is a niche I haven’t seen hardly anywhere. The action and quality make up for the smaller size. All 78 scenes have a minimum of 1080p as the highest download option, 12 of the scenes have 4K. Each scene has photo and screencap downloads. The models are not only pretty, but I also don’t believe it’s that common to have a lesbian site with darker complexion models. There is a thought most of these women really are lesbians or they are very good actresses. Cons: There are no dates on the scenes and from what I’ve read the network no longer updates. These are still worth downloading. There seems to be some technical problems with the site. The downloads for the picture zips comes up as potentially dangerous due to an unsecure connection. The videos take a while to load to stream too. Bottom Line: I like lesbian porn especially when it is of women that are possibly real lesbians and not just actresses. These women are very pretty, nice bodies and some of the positions they get themselves turned into makes me think they have experience in being with another woman. Most of the scenes are long (30 minutes plus) and cover showing both models in multiple positions to get all their best features in. The scene that led me to this site is two models I know are pros: Jenna Fox and Kira Noir. They are in an office and have a Sybian up on the desk. This is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen. It is right at 40 minutes long and includes kissing, fingering, oral, anal play, sixty-nine, and they somehow still have the energy left to take turns riding the Sybian while the other touches and kisses them. It’s one of those scenes that can make a site. Which is the best part of the site, nearly all the scenes are at least close to as good as this one. I saw this one on a tube site and the link from it led me to join since it is one of the scenes with up to 4K. I talk about this in another review from this network, they have little dots on the streaming scene’s timeline that tell you when the action changes. That one has Eating Pussy, Pussy Fingering, Sixty-Nine, Sybian easy to scan to spots in the scene. Those don’t show up on the downloaded version. As much as I liked that scene, it ended up being only my 3rd or 4th favorite scene from the site. The one with Nicole Bexley and Priya Price is one of the “roughest” lesbian scenes I’ve seen and they are listed as a couple. That was my feeling when watching some of these scenes. There is a lot of chemistry and maybe even taking liberties, that I don’t know that a non-couple (in real life) would risk. The other scene that made the membership worth the price features Sarah Banks and Jazzy Jamison. These are not names I recognize. The comfort-level between the women leads to most of my beliefs about a real relationship. There is pussy eating in this scene that I know real couples don’t even do. Deep licking, even nibbling with passionate kisses. The site has 78 scenes, photos and screencaps with each and the downloads are unlimited according to the join page which invites new members to download their whole collection. I still don’t know enough about technology to understand the 60 frames per second tag, but most of the scenes on this site has it. My favorite part of all the scenes on this site is the way they use foreplay in each of the scenes. A hand up the skirt rubbing over the panties is sexy to me. Especially when the rest of the clothes just start coming off naturally. It’s too bad the site isn’t updating anymore. This seems to be a underused niche in the lesbian genre. 12-08-21  07:34am Replies (0) Review 57 Grandparents X (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: This is how you do older/younger porn. Some of the scenes are foursomes between an older couple and younger couple. There are 63 scenes and videos can be downloaded. The look on a man’s face who looks to be 70, getting a double blowjob from a woman that looks 22 and another that looks 30. That has to be the most real emotion I’ve ever seen in porn. Videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. Updates 1-2 times per month. There are way too many morbid comments to add to that. The scenes look genuinely fun. Especially for the old guys. Cons: They need more updates. The scenes could be longer. Wondering how some of these oldest guys on these sites can even perform. These are the oldest looking guys I have seen on a site and I’ve told before I like older/younger porn. Bottom Line: Being from India, age is not considered as big of a deal as in the United States and a lot of my earliest sexual thoughts were of older men. Some of the men on this site look like the dad’s of the older men my sexual thoughts were about. We have the big bellies, the white hair, the white eyebrows, the white beards and white chest hair. The big, saggy, floppy balls and somehow the hard as a rock dicks. The scenes are not as creative as I think they could be. Most of the scenes are just an older woman, a young woman and a much older man. The scenes that I enjoyed the most are the ones with an older couple and younger couple. They switch partners and you have the moments where the younger woman is riding the older man while kissing the younger man who has the older woman in doggystyle. I just don’t think you are going to see that very often on porn sites. There is very good video quality. All 63 scenes have 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. The oldest scenes makes me think they started out with the plan of this being an older/younger lesbian site. Those oldest scenes have 2-3 women and at least one is young, while the other two are older. I like this male/female style better. I believe if it was all foursomes with the swinging thrown in it could be even better. That could be an advantage to using the older guys. They can’t move around a lot. Everyone fits in the camera. I do not know any of these models, male or female. Some of the older/younger scenes this studio makes include bisexual actions between the guys, but I haven’t seen in any of these scenes. They use Dirty Gunther in a lot of their group and younger/older scenes. He’s one of the main ones that does the male/male bisexual action. I haven’t seen him in any of these scenes. One part that’s not a complaint at all is they have some “older” men that really look more like late 40s, early 50s, which is an age range I’m usually attracted to in real life. I think that age range has landed in the tweener role now. Not quite old enough to fit the traditional older man scenes, not quite young enough to fit the standard male role in porn. I liked it and would recommend it for those into older/younger and/or swinger porn. 12-08-21  07:32am Replies (0) Review 58 Wank My Wood (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: 51 fun scenes that I really liked a lot. Very athletic looking, buff and in shape, masculine guys. Offers 4k and 60 fps for two scenes and the rest are in 1080p at their best. There is the ability to play the scenes in slow motion, which is great for cumshots. Easy to use site. Cons: Not updating There are not enough tags, but honestly I don’t think this matters much Bottom Line: Because of the name, I was expecting a site that was from a guy’s point of view. However, I was pleasantly surprised at how much I liked what I saw. The guys are very good looking, the kind of guy that I like to see in porn. They are masculine, buff and in shape and had nice manners. To me that is very sexy, even more than anything else that I can think of. I could also relate to the women. They were, for the most part, natural and not play acting or overacting. The scenes start with a little dialog, but really it is just no more than a pretext. I would have liked a bit more of a reason for the sex, but at least there was playful banter and the women were very willing partners. I was expecting just a stroking scene with the women there to please the guys. Nothing could be further from the truth I saw onscreen. The women had other kinds of sex, such as oral or vaginal, but it came across as that the women were just doing what we do naturally when we are with a nice looking guy with an attractive natural playtoy. They were not huge monsters and you could see that most were about the size of a woman’s hand and maybe a little more. My guess would be about 6 and a half inches, which for me is the perfect size. In many scenes the couple gave each other compliments and encouragement as well as telling each other what they liked. They say sex is mostly mental and I agree. A few scenes had a premise where it was in an office and the couple knew each other as boss with employee. One was even a therapist who got a bit carried away helping her patient relax. In most scenes, she strokes him and he tries to reciprocate by either fingering her or in some cases vaginal. She plays with his balls a lot in most scenes. I have found most guys are not okay with that, so for me that is a fantasy that I look for in porn. The scene I liked the best was called Hot Skinny Redhead Jerks Off Her Boyfriend and starred Layla Exx and Jarrod Steed. He got me with the name. He sounds like he is hard and ready to go. Unlike many of the other scenes, there was only stroking and no other sex. She absolutely loved what she was doing and he had his eyes roll into the back of his head. She kept asking him if he felt good and he kept telling her how much he was having fun, as well as what he liked for her to do. She kept telling him how much she enjoyed being with him and how much she was enjoying this. One thing I really liked was that she played with his balls just about nonstop. I never get tired of seeing guys balls and seeing them getting cupped and stroked. He eventually came on her smiling happy face and the cumshot is quite the scene, especially when I used the feature that lets you play it in slow motion. For me a one quarter speed meant I could focus on what I like the best in any porn scene. The site had a few other user friendly features. Besides one quarter speed, also available are half, normal, one and a half and double speed. Maybe I don’t know enough about porn, but I have never seen those as options before. Some other features are that you can favorite a scene, make a playlist, and even change the filters. Choices for those are natural, black and white, and vintage. I went with natural, but I can see why you might want to go for saturate on a few scenes. I tried vintage and black and white, but why would anyone want those? The scene descriptions were helpful and there are trailers. You can stream in choices that start with 720p as the best. There are more choices for downloading such as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p.They have both photos and screenshots too. There are a couple of cons. Besides that, the categories and tags are not very helpful, as there are only a few. In all fairness, with 51 scenes that is a con I can live with. I am not sure what guys would think of this site. I think they would agree that the women are pretty and a few are a dream come true. They come across as naturally interested in these guys, so for me that is a huge plus. I would not hesitate to recommend this for any woman. 12-08-21  07:30am Replies (0) Review 59 Puffy Network (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The network has almost 2200 scenes and 900 models. Most updates available in 4K for no extra charge. Has links to get other discounts. Excellent quality videos, but poor photosets. There are no download limits. I think there are more tags for searching than anybody has anywhere. Cons: The models are not always attractive with not much variety in body type or ethnically. The models don’t talk so it is hard to get to know them. Bottom Line: It is a tradition that men join porn sites more than women and the content you commonly find is mostly what men like. While there are many things I liked about this network, it is aimed more at men than women. Let’s just start with the name. When women think about getting puffy, it means uncomfortable and wishing it was over. Here puffy refers to the site Wet and Puffy, where pussy pumps make them bigger and more prominent. I have no interest in that. I watch porn to see women in action that I can identify with and go along with the fantasy of it being me. It is not so much to stare at outsized pussies. Maybe outsized hard cocks might work for me, but they are not to be found on this network. Even then, I want to see them being used, not just to look at. Besides the pussy pump being something I have never seen before, another is the pussypedia classifications for the three types of pussy. One is Puffy Peach, another Big Taco and the last is Big Cherry. These labels refer to the relative sizes of the inner and outer labia. While interesting, I can’t honestly say I care that much. The tag system is confusing. If you search using “pissing” you get 315 videos. If you look under “peeing” you get 123. You may well ask how could this be? They have too many tags, a true double edged sword. While having many of them is a great idea and you can use the tags with precision, having too many creates chaos. To compound it all they have an advanced search to further refine your efforts. I saw one video that had yes, it is true, well over 50 tags. These are the five sites in the network: Simply Anal - 160 updates and not just anal. Women having anal with both men and women. Not only anal, but oral and vaginal. Cumshots can be anywhere. Eurobabes Facials - 44 scenes and no longer updating. We Like to Suck - about 400 videos and not just blowjobs. About 300 videos include ball sucking, for me a big plus. Wet and Pissy - almost 550 videos. Masturbation with objects, as well as pissing. Wet and Puffy over 1000 videos. Masturbation with objects. The women are mostly from Eastern Europe and don’t talk. They look to be about 18 to 30 and some are well known stars, for example Lady Dee and Gina Gerson. I am no expert on famous stars, but these two are on nearly every site from Eastern Europe. For the most part the models are just doing what they are told to do and not how they feel. I found them to be just mechanical and not easy to identify with. I like to see myself as in the scene with them, but that rarely happens here. The site advertises that all the scenes are exclusive and you get a large enough archive with nearly 2200 video updates and poor quality photo sets. Recently the network has been adding five updates a week, which is not bad at all. Most videos can be downloaded in quality as high as 4K and there is no extra charge for it like you see on some other sites. They have smaller sizes, including ones for cell phones. There are a few other more minor criticisms. One is that the user name and passwords are randomly generated and make no sense. When you first sign up there are boxes that are already checked to join other sites. I was looking on the opposite side of the page and almost did not see I had to uncheck the boxes. However, if you are interested in other sites, they have seven pages with links for discounts. Right now there is a sale price of $7.95 a month as an early Black Friday special. 11-10-21  12:34am Replies (0) Review 60 Wet And Pissy (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Updates added once a week The site has almost 550 videos and photosets Uses a great many tags for searching All the scenes are exclusive Comes with four other sites Videos can be downloaded in eight options and the most recent include 4K Cons: Some of the tags are confusing The site layout needs improving. The non-member tour is easier to use than the member's area. It's the same content from the tour but they have it laid out in a way that becomes confusing. Bottom Line: When I was living in India, I developed a fetish for pissing. We don’t have the best public hygiene and seeing a man urinating outdoors is not uncommon. For women, this would be extremely taboo and pretty much unimaginable. Although this site has its main concept of seeing women pissing, it is done indoors and as a kind of surrogate for sex. The women see pissing as a sex act in a way. I think it is fair to say that the pee is treasured as if it were a man’s cum and makes these women do things with it that help them reach orgasm. Well, maybe I should say a porn fake orgasm as these women are all acting out a fantasy and do it for a paycheck. These are stars I have seen before on other sites and even on the other four sites within the Puffy Network that is included with your membership. The women are for the most part, pretty and thin Eastern European models that don’t talk. Instead, their actions speak for them. They play to the camera and seem to be acting out what a director is looking for them to do more than out of any spontaneous passion. That makes me feel a bit left out of the scene as I would have preferred that they were a bit more original and believable. For me the best pissing videos are showing a forbidden act. For the site the women see themselves as putting on a show for men who want to see pissing acts that are a lot more than just a biological relief. One example of that is when you click on the models list, you get thumbnails of their faces as you would expect, but you also get a picture in picture smaller shot of their pussy with piss coming out. There seems to be a desire for acts that are striking visually and are in their own way a bit extreme. For the most part you get stripping and showing off her body, just like most male focused porn and then a bit of toys, dildos, etc. to get her in the mood or you see her pissing and doing all kinds of things with the piss. She drinks it, pours it over herself, licks it up from the floor, pees in her clothes and then squeezes the piss into her mouth or licking toys covered in piss. The tags are extensive and many of them are perfect for the niche. Sometimes I felt overwhelmed by how many there are and was confused by the differences between them. Sometimes the tags felt overlapping and maybe even redundant. You can see for yourself as these are just a few and I don’t think this is even close to a complete list of the tags that are piss focused. Clothed pissing, clothing mopping, golden shower, licking up piss, licking toys, peeing, piss drinking, piss play, pissing, pissing during insertion, pissing in glass, pissing in pants, pissing on self, piss spitting, pussy wash, standing pee, sucking on clothing, wet and messy, watersports, wet, wet hair, wet toy, wet panties. This is a shortened description of one of the better scenes. Keira stands up before she starts pissing into her panties. Her stream trickles through the fabric and her denims, then strips out of them to mop up her pee from the floor using her panties. Squeezing her piss in the panties into her mouth, she climbs up onto the table and fingers her pussy. She gushes all over the table, then leans over, lapping up her pee. Next, she holds a glass vase underneath her and pees right into it before pouring it into her mouth and all over her face, going down her body. She uses her fingers as she brings herself to orgasm. The videos have as many as eight download options including 4K and there are two for the photo sets, which are not worth bothering with. Updates come once a week and the archive is huge for a specialized fetish site with about 550 videos. Not only are all the scenes exclusive, I can’t think of any pissing site I can compare it to. 11-10-21  12:22am Replies (0) Review 61 ChickPass Network (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Updates once or twice a day Both 4K and High Definition downloads are offered The site says the scenes are exclusive and I think most of the models are as well. I did not find any download limits Pornusers offers a discounted price Cons: Older scenes are not High Definition The site needs more Indian American models. Just joking as they have one and I am not sure there is another they could find to add. Bottom Line: There is a lot I like about this site as it is so very different from most porn sites I have been a member of. Yes it has sex, but that is not all you get for your membership. You get a site that kind of breaks the mold. What I mean is that the videos mostly star only one male model, Logan, who also owns the site and is the contact for customer service. It has an old fashioned, hands on feel to it, except that porn like this is not as common as I would like. He is an older gentleman who calls himself a geek. Balding and with a paunch, he is polite and even deferential towards the amateur models. He talks to them and asks them questions. He seems incredulous that they would have sex with him. I like that in a man, one who appreciates his woman. He looks like someone I would find attractive in real life. Most men in porn expect that women should be grateful for an opportunity to be with them. How self entitled and a turn off is that? Give me a polite gentleman and I sit up and take notice. At the end of many scenes he thanks the model and asks if she would like to come back. Part of the reason I say this is that I am from India, where being modest and not being full of yourself is considered very important. Besides that, older men are highly respected as we see them as power figures, much more so than do women in the United States. In India it is very common for older men to marry much younger women. The sex is not your same old same old porn sex either. There are no extreme acts and the sex is done the way us non pornstars find pleasure. For example he often cums in the woman’s mouth and she closes her mouth around it with the cum inside. You don’t always get to see the cum or the cumshot, but you can tell by the realistic body language and moans that the orgasm is real. Porn sex is in some ways not real life sex and this site benefits from that touch of realism. The models are completely unassuming as well. They enjoy the sex and quite sincerely seem to like him. They are not barely legal and they are not innocent either. They come across as self confident and happy to be in the scene. They are very much women you night meet in real life at a party, a bar or even a get together with your neighbors. Another thing I appreciate about the models is that there is no set pattern or look that they share. Some are short, some tall, some thin, some white, some black, some Asian and some are Latina. Being from India I was delighted to see that rare type of model, a woman who is Indian American. There is a large Indian American community in New Jersey and Naomi Shah is from there. In India most women don’t shave, but in this country we nearly all do. Her body is very lean, clean shaved, she has a pretty face and has a few tattoos. Many Indian women have them. You see a stripper who has a very positive attitude towards nudity and also regarding sex. She has only twelve scenes, including an interview. Most are blow jobs or masturbation and there is also some vaginal. My only complaint is that she does not have more scenes. I am not sure who enjoyed her scenes more, her or the male model Logan. She seems to really like his penis and looks comfortable being naturally sexy. The site uses a layout that I have not seen before. It was not hard to figure out and everything you need is there. It uses tags for an easy search and some of the scenes are available in both 4K as well as High Definition. The site has been adding one or two updates a day and has a very large archive of more than 6200 videos going back to 2008. Obviously some older scenes have lower quality. 10-28-21  07:56pm Replies (0) Review 62 College Amateurs (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The most recent videos are in very sharp 4K Logan is the male talent in many of the videos and he is very likeable Most of the scenes are exclusive to the network Most if not all, of the women are fresh, even first time amateurs There are no download limits New updates are added just about every day. Cons: The oldest videos are standard definition. The site started in 2008. There is some ethnic variety, but I would like even more. Bottom Line: I don’t know for sure if all these young ladies are actually in college, but they look like they are in the right age range. They seem to be starting at barely legal and 18 to mature sexy women aged to about 24. Looking back on my life in college, I thought I was incredibly sexy and so did those college boys. This is the age when most of us explore all kinds of things and of course sex is among those. What else are those raging hormones for? On Chickpass they can act out a few of those desires and not only with college age boys. Some of these scenes have them with older men as a contrast. These women have the energy the older guys have, but not really the experience. In many cases they seem to have that natural quality of a new, or fairly new exploration. Some of those scenes pair them with Logan, the website owner and he really is a rarity in porn. He is polite, respectful and cares that his partners enjoy his scenes with them. Logan is on the receiving end of a lot of blow jobs, but there is some other sex as well. Blow jobs seem to be a sex act that is not that difficult for a young lady new to porn. They control the action as the lucky guy is fairly passive. Further, other sex is more physically demanding. I don’t think many first timers or even those who have done a few scenes would do anal with a stranger. At that age it is very possible they have never done that in their personal lives either. Other sex you see on the site includes masturbation and lesbian. In both of those a large number of beginners would feel comfortable doing that on camera. Many scenes involve toys and wands and in some cases there are even some vaginal and/or anal insertions. The women come in all body types, but most are very thin. At that age Mother Nature has not changed our bodies much. This makes for a lot of similarities in the women, but many of us like that look. It signals to our brain that these women are fresh and eager. One theme you see here is her in a cheerleader outfit. They are full of energy and enthusiasm, wearing a micro skirt, with nice legs and performing for a crowd. You see no cellulite or drooping, and they seem perfect to us women who are older. The site is updating at about once a day on average. The most recent are available in 4K and many are at least High Definition. The oldest videos started before High Definition became available, but many of the videos are remastered to improve them. I think porn like this is perfect for women new to watching porn and they can also feel comfortable watching these scenes with their guy. Both the men and women are easy on the eye and the sex feels real enough to enjoy. Who knows, maybe one thing may lead to another that night. There is a good discount through Pornusers and you also get the rest of the Chickpass Network. There are 88 sites and a lot of the content is of young ladies in this age range. 10-28-21  07:53pm Replies (1) Review 63 Slave Mouth (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Some of the best BDSM porn you can find. Unusual, maybe unique focus on oral BDSM. Highly creative exclusive content with an attention to detail that is amazing. Great performances by BDSM professionals. The site layout is easy to use with tags for easy searching There is a trailer for reach scene as well as photos. Cons: The site is updating slowly, only three so far this year. There are only 45 videos online so far. Too expensive for the quantity, but they are high quality. The downloads could be faster, but they are not a major problem. If you want 4K videos, you have a different join price. You can’t just pay extra scene by scene. Bottom Line: There are quite a few BDSM sites, but mostly they are not all that authentic. BDSM enthusiasts see their lifestyle as a choice, where both doms and subs make fantasies come true. Real BDSM is not mean spirited, on the contrary, it is role play by those who understand boundaries and limits. While it may look rough for those who participate, it is all about consent and power transfer. Dominance can make the scenes satisfying for the models in a way that ordinary sexual activity cannot. The site states "As lovers of BDSM and fetish activities ourselves, we know that even the most sadistic expression of sexual fantasy does not prevent people from being good human beings in everyday life." If this is a new concept to you in your personal life, you just have to accept that these participants are often ordinary people who just think differently. As my friend says, it requires a suspension of disbelief. There is an interview both before and after. They talk about how the scene made them feel, how much fun it was, as well as how much they respect their partner. In the section of the site where potential models can learn about how they can get hired, they emphasize how much you have to be turned on by BDSM. Just doing this for a paycheck is discouraged. As a result, the scenes have an unrehearsed, genuinely sexy and in a way, fun feeling. A lot of mainstream porn is made factory style with the scenes basically being clones and the models interchangeable. This type of porn is 180 degrees the opposite. Slave Mouth is a sister site of Assylum. Many of the same models are on both sites and you need a separate membership for each one. You can get a discount for joining both, but this is not an ordinary priced site or network. I believe you get what you pay for, for the most part, and that is true here. You get top level models, great production values and some truly intense, cleverly made scenes. The difference between Assylum and Slave Mouth is a focus on anal vs oral domination, but the lines between the two concepts are not firmly drawn. Assylum has plenty of oral and Slave Mouth includes some anal. Some well known American BDSM models are on the site, like Charlotte Sartre and Rebel Rhyder. Some others I don’t recognize may be amateurs or exclusive to the site. The performances are near perfect and stick to the niche without any scenes that can be criticized as mere filler. The oral can of course be forceful, rough face fucking, but can also include dildos and other objects being inserted orally. Sometimes there is gagging, sometimes their eyes water, sometimes they are choking for air, they cry. There is a lot of rimming on the dom by the sub, often repeatedly over and over. The models accept being pissed on and drink piss. They eat frozen cum in ice cube form. In a few scenes, their tongue is caned. Often their mouth is drilled while in suspension. Verbal dominance is a common theme, but it is not mean or cruel. I would never call these scenes misogynistic, but a relationship where both sides are willingly sharing an experience. But I should warn you that watching the scenes is not for the squeamish or those with firm boundaries as to what is hot and what is over the line. I would imagine those who like the content the most have joined other BDSM sites in the past. The site uses Segpay, a very trusted biller, the members pages easy to understand and without advertising for outside sides. There is a trailer for each scene and there are photos too. The choices for downloads include very sharp, first class High Definition as well as 720 HD and 480SD. There are links for the two sister sites, Assylum and Dom the Nation and you can get discounts for adding either or both sites. For me the real question is the balance of price vs. value. Assylum is bigger and is iconic with 234 updates. Slave Mouth has 45,has added three videos in 2021 and three in 2020.The price for each is the same, about $30. If you get both you are looking at about $50. The content on Assylum and on Slave Mouth is some of the best to be found for this niche and am happy I signed up for both. The previews are quite complete so it is useful to check them out and see for yourself. 10-28-21  07:49pm Replies (0) Review 64 PJ Girls (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I found the Eastern European models to be very pretty 4K is an option Very different for a site with women who are alone (see below) Bonus scenes as a reward for long term membership Interesting pussy classifications No download limits Daily update of either a video or a photoset Cons: Not much variety in the models or the locations The scenes can become boring if this is not your taste (see below) No discount offered by Porn Users. This site is not cheap, but worth it for the quality. Bottom Line: Most sites that have women showing off their bodies are primarily photo sites with a few videos that are not well done. Some other sites focus on videos of women masturbating. While the videos on this site sometimes have masturbation, the ones I like the best are those where the woman is proudly exhibiting her girly parts. Some of my friends and I have shared with each other that we have a fantasy fetish of being examined by a gynecologist. There is just a tingly feeling we get knowing a man is seeing what makes us women. While there are no men as doctors or as any other role on the site in any scene, the use of a speculum is a part of a medical fetish. Some scenes use an endoscope to have a camera show what is deep inside. Here you will also find a pussycam, as well as a metallic gizmo pussy spreader, both things I had no idea existed before this. The main focus on the site is a lot of pussy spreading and even gaping vaginally. In some scenes, there is a second or even a third woman. You might expect some lesbian sex, but there is none. When the scene evolves to the point where I would have expecting pussy licking, fingering or clit massaging, they put on a show just for you. The focus changes from them and what would make them happy, to what would make you happy to see. What you see is the women spreading each other, showing each other to the camera and that often involves mirroring. I find that insanely hot as both women are doing the same things side by side and it makes for some unforgettable heat and striking visuals. Sometimes there is fisting or a focus on using dildos or wands on each other. I got the feeling that the site is made for me and my pleasure and they do most definitely try hard to please. The type of scene that I liked best were the outdoor exhibitionist ones. In most of those the women were in a secluded safe place such as under a bridge. A quick glance to see if it is safe and then a little more explicit. Eventually they are there, as carefree with their bodies as the day they were born. Many of these women clearly enjoy the sexy show that makes them moist. Some other scenes were shot indoors on a bed or on a staircase. I liked those scenes as well, but there is something daring and stimulating about risking getting caught outdoors. Many times I felt that the women were too attractive to do such extreme spreading, but that is part of what makes this site so effective. You come here for the models and they leave you speechless with their performances. Nearly all the models are Czech or from another Eastern European country. Those places have mostly thin white women, so there is not much diversity. A few are a little older, at least one is pregnant, and I found some are porn stars I recognize, such as Lexi Dona. Some may be amateurs, but I just don’t know. I was surprised to see two black women mixed in. That leads me to wonder, could I do this? I can’t, I am not that kind of daring or self confident. I can see this site as something I can relate to as a woman and that is saying a lot. The site has tags and they seem to be adequate, as is the ease with which I used the website. One thing also worth mentioning is that pussies are classified as shaved with over 1100 videos, trimmed over 300, hairy 36, huge almost 500, tight 200, juicy almost 300, and tongue 90 videos, which is a pussy with an extra fold. I am sure there is an overlap here as a shaved pussy might also be a juicy one. There has been a history of a video or a photo update every day and the archive is large with over 1400 videos. You even get extra bonus videos for a membership of at least three months. For me the site was interesting, but the scenes may get boring for those looking for more sex. This site works for me, but I think for some people my advice would be a one month membership. I would add that you get what you pay for. The site is well worth the price, but wish there was a discount. 10-28-21  07:45pm Replies (0) Review 65 Dom The Nation (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Updates every two weeks, excellent for a specialized niche site Extremely high level of creativity Has links with discounts for its sister BDSM sites, Assylum and Slavemouth Not only a fetish site for BDSM, it works as an older/younger site and a rarity for porn, every scene is outdoors in a rural, natural setting Uses tags like painal, whipping, and impact play.These are specific to BDSM scenes Cons: Less than 40 updates and six are only a few photos The videos and photo sets are not separated Bottom Line: Some sites are easy to compare to their competitors as they have a lot in common. Very few sites can be truly called unique or original. But then again I occasionally run across the rare site that is so different that it can truly be called out of the norm, in a way that you can only hope that others will imitate. You may well ask, what is so different? Two people or more take off their clothes and do the deed, so how is this site worthy of singling out for praise? Porn is about fantasy and many times the porn you see is not truly how it is done offscreen by regular people like you and me. A great example is that most lesbian porn is a fantasy for men and real lesbians have told me that they don’t like a lot of it. This site is a work of love by real life Dom Neil, who found much of the BDSM porn made today does not appeal to him. He is also quite a camera artist and loves the freedom and beauty of nature. If the idea of seeing scenes shot outdoors day and night, with all levels of lighting appeals to you, this is your site. If you love seeing rented farmland, or mountains, streams and models having fun appeals to you, this just may be your site. The same is true for camerawork that should be studied and imitated on how to get the essence of the model’s personality. Or maybe you just like unrehearsed, never overplanned and never boring BDSM with great models who enjoy their work. In some of the first few updates, you get journal entries and playful scenes more than the sex scenes. The site started off a bit slowly as they started filming in 2019, but delayed the launch until February of 2021. As a result the site does not have a ton of content. The planning that went into filming the site gives it a lot of potential moving forward. The models wear custom made audio collars that work well in order to pick up sounds outdoors. Every scene is shot with the panorama of nature a second focus to the models and the action. The video specs can be confusing. The main thing to note is the films are presented in 2.39:1 (very widescreen) cinema format, using film with some anamorphic lenses, and when you desqueeze the image from the lenses, this is the size you get. It's great for capturing the beauty and presence of the landscapes. The movies on the site are filmed in cinemascope and the actual videos specs are a bit different from regular 16:9 video specs due to the cinemascope format. All of the sexual content revolves around very hard BDSM. If you find a site like this to be appealing, you will find a lot to like such as difficult positions, bondage, anal, rimming, forceful oral and peeing. In every case, he makes sure the models act out fantasies they have and gets the maximum pleasure from them captured on film. There is also playful content that helps you see a real, very accessible side to the models too. An example of one of the playful scenes has Rory Knox using a blow dryer on the Dom’s underwear as an example of another kind of blowjob. Another scene that I enjoyed was the same Rory Knox giving Dom Neil a foot job. She licked every toe and took his foot into her mouth as acts of worship like I have never seen before. In another with a high level of male fantasy, Audrey Holliday who was beaten and anally abused while, hold on, playing football. I can imagine a guy grabbing a beer and watching this scene in a loop during halftime. My absolute favorite scene was any of the three that Rebel Rhyder was in. The one where she was cosub with Brooke Johnson was amazing as they both obeyed Dom Neil in a scene worthy of an award. The interactions between them, as well as with Dom Neil, were enough to make me love the site. The site was easy to use, except for the fact that the videos and the photo sets were mixed together. The site lists updates in chronological order, not by type. Additions currently are every two weeks, but the archive is still small with less than 40 and that includes photo updates. I liked the site and can confidently predict a great future for it as it has a great concept and does what it does very well. 10-28-21  07:41pm Replies (0) Review 66 Assylum.com (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The director allows the models to act spontaneously. There are weeks of planning and discussions with the models that take place before the scene happens. BDSM forum where you can offer ideas for scenes. The site has exclusive content that is very creative. (See below) You see some of the biggest names in BDSM porn. They don’t shoot models that are not seriously into the BDSM lifestyle and they don’t work with talent agents unless they have experience representing BDSM models. There are interviews with the models, both before and after the scenes and also clips of them doing hobbies such as making pasta or working out. These models make you feel you know them. Cons: There are more models on the site besides those listed. If you want 4K there is a more expensive option. The site has been updating recently at one a month, which is average for rare specialty porn. Bottom Line: BDSM porn is about domination and submission, a power transfer between consenting adults. It is a lifestyle for serious participants who live out the fantasies. Most of what passes for BDSM in porn is not much like what those who do these things in their personal lives actually do. On this site you have an invitation to see a world that you may never witness otherwise. In contrast, this site has real male dominants who are paired with women who authentically want to submit on camera. you can see it in their eyes as well as their facial expressions. There is a lot more than rough anal sex going on here; there is crazy, demented, challenging bondage. Many scenes have humiliation, both verbal and physical, as well, giving you the feel of authenticity. Weeks before a scene is shot, the attention Is focused on making the scenes as creative and engaging as possible. The models are asked for input as to what they want to do and each scene is based on the model’s unique personality. Here you find scenes that are individually hand crafted. Most porn sites have models that you have seen on many sites before, but here the approach is different. There are many attractive models on this site, but the focus is on their performances more than their looks. If a model does well, she gets more scenes. The site says that they will interview models, but don’t want subs who are into this just for the money. A few mainstream performers are to be found here, such as Casey Calvert. In the last few years, they have worked with some superstars of BDSM porn and a few I think who are exclusive to this site. One I have seen on other sites is Rebel Rhyder, a beautiful superstar who would do well on a glam model site. You would not believe she would do these things. I swear there is no sex act or BDSM scenario that is more than she can handle and handle like the ultimate pro that she is. Included in her five scenes are a three hour gangbang that is nonstop, sadistic, anal insanity. The idea was hers and I could not believe what happened in that scene. Hint, it has four doms, two male and two female. Another big name BDSM star is Charlotte Sartre. I have seen her on a few other sites, but her fifteen scenes here are collector’s items, true BDSM classics. Her specialty is degradation and my favorite one of her scenes is Rim Jobs For All. She recites a script with praise for how much she likes to give rimjobs, all while doing, guess what? Rimjobs to two doms. As is common on BDSM sites, the models have interviews both before and after to tell you the scene was consensual fun for them. Six of the models have one minute clips of them showing their non porn hobbies. They come across as ordinary people who happen to like BDSM, so you can feel you they are relatable. These are not some strange group of perverts; they are women who cook, work out or make crafts. Some don't even wear makeup. The bondage is some of the most interesting that I have ever seen. There are many kinds of rope use, but also there are many different devices and props. Think plastic bins or masks as examples. The positions most models are in are often visually impactful and the models happily endure discomfort for long periods. The sex is mostly anal, but there is a lot of female on male rimming, ass to mouth and a lot of oral that is quite forceful. I like that the scenes are unscripted and the reactions of the models comes across as quite spontaneous. Despite the videos being extreme, the models seem to be friends who are interacting without being mean, they are just friends that have a shared interest. The same company has two other BDSM sites, Slave Mouth and Dom the Nation. I liked both of them, but this is not a network. The models who are willing to make these scenes are by definition rare, the ideas complex, the filming very intense, as well as time consuming to edit. Many scenes are well over an hour and some are so long that they are split into parts. After you join you see a link for joining each additional site at a discount. If this interests you, this is well worth a premium price. Did I forget to say they have 234 videos ? 10-28-21  07:37pm Replies (0) Review 67 Dream Tranny (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Transsexual site that has two of my favorite transsexual niches – solo and transsexual sex with a female. Large site with 560 scenes plus 206 scenes in their archive (first time I have seen a site have a separate archive). The site updates 3 times per week. All transsexual sites are hit or miss with me on attractiveness from model to model. This one is too. But most are attractive with some very pretty transsexuals too. There are 322 models. The navigation is very good. The search filters include everything you could possibly find on a transsexual site and that is good for me with my preference of solo/masturbation and transsexuals with females. Updates are easy to find, they even show previews of soon to come scenes. Video downloads are available in 480p, 720p and 1080p. There are photosets with 100+ photos in 2000x3000 resolution, those are also downloadable. The price is very good for this much high quality content. Cons: Looking at the archive section, the video quality does drop on the older videos in it, but as mentioned, I haven’t ever seen a site split their content up between updates and archive. Some of the archive content has 1080p. A few of those scenes are just photosets. It is me trying to find something to list as a con. The photo downloads all have the same filename. I have had that same problem on multiple other sites. Bottom Line: This is one of the better transsexual sites I have been a member of. My two biggest interests in transsexual porn – as a straight woman, are the solo scenes and the scenes of the transsexuals having sex with a female. It fills in a gray area between bi-curious (for me) and I enjoy watching penises masturbated. That’s not a niche that any genre covers well, but I do believe the transsexual genre comes closest and this site especially does. Using their search filters, I can see that they have 25 transsexuals having sex with females scenes. I would like that to be a little higher, but that’s part of liking a niche that isn’t mainstream. Some is better than none. Where this site makes me very happy is they have over 200 solo scenes. The number is higher, but because some masturbation scenes turn into sex scenes, I’m estimating at 200 to be on the safe side, most of those that come up as masturbation are solo. They use something I can’t say I’ve seen with transsexuals and that’s a fucking machine. It doesn’t fully register with me since I am most interested in watching the masturbation. It’s definitely not a distraction. You see more of the feminine side of these transsexuals with the fucking machines and even manual dildos. These two paragraphs represent my favorite content on the site. There is a search filter I feel needs to be brought up. Natural breasts. More and more transsexuals are going to female hormone therapy and developing natural breasts instead of implants. I believe that adds a lot of value to this site. As I mentioned, one of my interests in transsexual is maybe a version of bi-curious. The transsexual having real breasts really goes into that curiosity. The only thing that is masculine about some of these models is their penis. Natural breasts makes that even more noticeable and I also believe natural breasts tempers expectations on the natural breasted transsexuals performance. If she doesn’t have the full masculine hormones, there’s a good chance she’s not going to be able to create a large ejaculation. The sex scenes are surprisingly long, with many nearing the 40 minute range and that’s just not that normal in transsexual porn. It is hard to believe, but transsexual porn has already formed its own version of repetitive porn just like male/female straight porn has, but this site avoids that. There isn’t a lot to find wrong with this site. Maybe they could cut back a little on the ads? It’s not bad, but when you first sign-in there is the page with multiple offers of other sites. Every page on the site also has a few ads across the top of the screen, but I guess they have to make money. It’s at least not distracting. I have said before I believe sites need to cater to a more balanced audience. This one does it as well as any site does. It has around 1/3 of its content in the solo niche, the 25 scenes of transsexual with a female and the rest is transsexuals with men or transsexuals with transsexuals. I like seeing the different niches within the genre covered. As mentioned, this is a large site with over 700 scenes (including archives). The quality is excellent for a transsexual site with at least 75% of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads. The downloadable photosets with the 2000x3000 resolution. The near perfect navigation. The addition of the “natural breasts” search filter/tag. They just aren’t giving me much to complain about. It’s up near the top of my favorite transsexual sites now. I would like to see them add some ladyboys, Asian transsexuals, but there are other sites that do that. It’s just an idea. This site has earned its score. 10-21-21  03:50pm Replies (0) Review 68 Priya Rai Official (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: All the videos are in High Definition and are exclusive There are 71 sites in the Puba Network Downloads are fast I'm always interested in models from India Cons: Videos are not dated I think that the site is no longer adding new content. With only 52 videos it is just too small No interaction with her fans on the site, but there is a link to her Twitter account I don’t like that she has implants and uses too much makeup Not enough straight or lesbian sex Bottom Line: There are very few Indian women who make porn, as it is illegal there. The women who are pornstars live in other countries, such as the UK, Canada or the United States. Priya was born in New Delhi, but was adopted by an American couple and raised as an American. What we have in common is that I was also born in India, but I am an American by choice. Before becoming a porn star, she was a lingerie and swimwear model, then a stripper for 12 years. She is comfortable showing her body and is best on this site in her solo scenes. For six years she was a major pornstar and won industry awards for best new starlet, best group sex scene and later in her career for best MILF. She retired for six years and when she decided on a comeback, it was to create this website. I can only assume she did not have the rights to her earlier huge catalog of scenes, as the ones here were made in more recent years. She was in her forties when she opened the site. She fell into a common strategy among older models and has implants and uses too much makeup. Some women age well and some honestly just don’t. I feel that her videos here are not comparable to her videos from years ago. Here she has 52 videos and photo sets. Since the review by Rabbits Reviews in April 2019, the site has added only one video and one photo set. The updates don’t say when they were posted, so I think the site is not still growing. There is no interaction with her on the site, but there is a link to her Twitter account. A few scenes are boy/girl, a few even show foot jobs, lesbian or are mutual masturbation, but most are of her alone. She uses fingers, dildos, vibrators and toys as well as a sybian and a rocking chair. I have never seen one of those on a porn site. Her range of abilities and sexual appetite don’t shine through as she doesn’t have enough scenes with partners. The site is rather simple and uncomplicated and every video is in High Definition, but none are 4K. There are more photo sets than videos, but they were just ok. I am not into photos and would not care much anyway. I was not sure what to expect when I logged onto the site for the first time. But after spending time on the site, I do feel she could have done better. 09-07-21  05:06pm Replies (0) Review 69 Czech Hotties.com (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Nice size library of 126 videos and photosets. However, the TBP review in 2011 mentions over 130. Beautiful Eastern European models, thin and many are blondes. The models are introduced stripping from nice clothes. I loved the sexy shorts for example Easy searches for content Part of 71 site PUBA network The orgasms seem real and not faked Cons: The scenes are not dated. The one listed as most recent is Standard Definition 640x480. Low quality small photos. I saw the measurements for one as 1000x666. Bottom Line: I like solo masturbation sites of all kinds, both male and female. If someone is having fun getting off, I can imagine myself witnessing or participating right along with them. I joined the Puba network for a few of their sites and this was one I had hoped would be one of their better ones. The women are uniformly young, pretty, thin and sexy to a fault. The scenes start with the model stripping to nude from ordinary street clothes. The outfits were not exotic or designed for a porn scene. No lingerie or stripper clothes are to be seen. Many of them are wearing short shorts and these showcase their legs. In many cases I saw enhanced breasts and those I don’t like. In the scenes have the models use fingers to get them off. In most videos there are dildos and in some there are other toys. At this point I must stop and explain. These are old videos by porn standards. I saw only Standard Definition videos and the quality a mere 640x480. That would date these scenes as pre 2010, as around then we started to see High Definition. In 2011 the review by The Best Porn mentions there were over 130 videos and today there are 126. At the time these videos were new, there were nowhere near the quality or variety of sex toys we have now. No wands are on the site, in fact there is not a single battery either. Given that limitation, the action is both oral and anal. Some scenes have a dildo in her mouth, simulating oral sex. Some scenes have the expecting vaginal insertion, but others also have anal insertions. I saw some ass to mouth and a lot of dildo licking too. In a few scenes there is a double penetration that was a visual treat. Further, there are some large dildos, but not extremely large, some are black and some are white. There are a few lesbian scenes too. They use fingers, dildos and toys on each other, but they also use tongues. Although there is no talking, which is common in Eastern European porn, there was quite a bit of moaning and other noises that did not sound fake or just acting. I think these women got off on what we witnessed. If I were writing this in 2011, this would get a higher score. In spite of this being part of a large network, the low quality is a deal breaker. I love the concept and wish new, more high quality updates were coming. 09-07-21  05:03pm Replies (0) Review 70 Mature Fucks Teen (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Comes with Smut Puppet network Can download High Definition content, but not 4K Uses tags to find what you like Most cumshots on her face or in her mouth Many very classy distinguished looking gentlemen Cons: No longer updating and only 64 scenes In some videos the age differences are not that much The scene descriptions sound like poorly worded women’s erotic stories Bottom Line: I like older men and younger women together and it is one of my favorite fantasies. When I was younger I started to see older men as more mature and less selfish versions of what men should be. For me a classy distinguished gentleman is very attractive. Older men appreciate younger women, sometimes they are even grateful to us for sex. In a way that makes me think men my own age are not as attractive. I have joined and also have reviewed other sites of this type. This one is offered as part of a Smut Puppet membership. Of course that means you get a lot more than just this one site. So how does this site compare to older younger ones I have joined before? In all fairness it is not the best and it is not the worst either. Some of the men are close in age to the women and that kind of decreases the appeal to my imagination in my opinion. The site states the women are half his age. I can only say sometimes, or at least the difference is not worth getting all excited over. Of course there also are many of the older guys who are the age of those I want on a site of this type. Give me some graying facial hair or a balding man and a bit of a paunchy belly and the fantasy begins. The women are pretty, but as is so common on a site like this, they are mid twenties, where I would hope for barely legal teens with fresh faces. At that age most women are naïve sexually and a teacher can help so much to get them to blossom sexually. However, I do like watching them in action. At least the cum shots are interestingly visually. Mostly they are facial or in her mouth, which for me is reasonably hot. I don’t like internals, and did not find any here. The sex itself includes oral, vaginal and that rarity in older/younger-anal. Nothing disrespectful, rough or over the top hardcore, just enough to show that the performers have some level of chemistry. The video quality varies from High Definition to remastered Standard definition. The difference is noticeable, but the statistics and file sizes are not really helpful in figuring out which are which. The site is not hard to figure out so it is easy to use and downloads were fast enough. For me the fact that new videos are not being added and that there are only 64 are negatives. What you do get is enjoyable and worth joining of you like this type of porn. 09-07-21  05:01pm Replies (0) Review 71 Love Wetting (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The video download options include 4K Many beautiful and major name Czech pornstars are on the site and are in multiple videos for each one. There are bonus videos that you get access to for loyalty. There is an update almost every day. Nearly 2200 videos are available, some in 4K. Bills using Epoch and CCBill, two of the most reliable in the business. Cons: For the most part, the videos run two minutes or less. There is no sex of any kind at all. It is good that the site sticks to the theme, but what a waste not to use the pornstar lineup here. Bottom Line: This is a site that interests me as a woman from India. Back home there, it is not uncommon for Indian men to urinate in public. If a woman did that, it would be a much lewder act. This is so looked down upon that it would actually be considered acceptable that if a male witnessed that, there would be severe penalties. In my case this has resulted in my being turned on by the idea of such a taboo act. The appeal is more a fetish than erotic. There is no sex at all in any of the videos and I see that as a missed opportunity. The models are mostly very pretty, Eastern European and I recognized many of them from other porn sites. There are a few men on the sites though. They sometimes spy on the women while they are peeing and in a few cases stalk them. Their role on the site is not important and you never get to see them pee either. I wanted to see the men doing more. Maybe they should have been asserting dominance when they caught a peeing woman? I was hoping for that as it would have seemed what was a logical consequence in my native culture. In some videos labeled as wetting, you see the women peeing in their clothes. I understand sometimes we all have to go, but these videos did nothing for me. Sometimes the women are in what are labeled as pissing scenes and some videos have them letting it all out in scenes outdoors. The difference is that in the second category the premise is that of desperation. A woman is on a bus and has the urge so bad she gets off to relieve herself. For me these are the reason to join the site. The natural way they act is a contrast with so much of the sex we see in porn. Nothing about a scene like these is fake, forced, unnatural or even hard to relate to. It can be easy to identify with the models. They could easily be you or someone you know. Who can say that there have been times we have not been in a similar situation? The scenes I enjoyed the most were kind of a parody of the natural urges. There were contests and prizes awarded for holding your pee and the stars won or lost. Their personalities came out quite clearly and there was the reminder that these young ladies were doing the site for money. They had fun and they laughed. So did I. Understandably, the videos were very short, about two minutes. The site stayed on topic and that is all the time needed. However you get updates almost every day. I liked the site, but it could have been better. A nice surprise here and there and a bit more of the unpredictable would have been better. 09-07-21  04:58pm Replies (0) Review 72 Jim Slip (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Advertised as compatible with Ipad, Iphone and Android Lots of costumes, nylons and pantyhose There are 750 videos and almost as many photosets New videos every two weeks Comes with 86 studios Pornusers has a discounted price Older/Younger theme Many big name stars got started here Cons: A lot of lesser quality videos as this site has been around for a long time Better search options would help with this much content Bottom Line: The site called Jim Slip has been online since 2003. Jim likes those younger women and his scenes with them have a great and deserved reputation for being classics. If there were a Porn Hall of Fame, his site would be in it. He deserves a lifetime achievement award for porn excellence and his wife should have one for her camerawork. Even in his oldest scenes he comes across as an older British gentleman who treats his partners well, with classic old time dignity and respect. In his most recent scenes he has aged, but still comes across well. In some scenes he wears a business suit and seems to be very much an ordinary to upper class Brit. In each scene he interviews the models and he has a proper British accent. As someone who grew up in India, we find that exotic as well as sexy. He is a stark contrast with men I met in India, absolutely nothing like Indian men I have met. I can easily see a young lady being charmed by him and his demeanor. I wish I had met him back when I was much younger. Let me change that, the charm works for me now. In the scenes, the women often go into costume, like for example, being a sexy nurse. They wear leather, short skirts, fishnets, boots, you name it. He has them dress up in pantyhose or nylons to add to a fetish theme. I loved the sexy look that for the most part focused on their legs and feet. The models are newbies or almost new to porn. He has UK pornstars as well as stars from the continent that made it big, like Gina Gerson and Amirah Adara. One thing I love about older/younger porn is that the models are not yet sure of what they like or want to do and he is like a sex teacher for them. In some older/younger sites the fantasy is ruined by the parings being close in age, but here they play up the age differences for all its worth. Many of the scenes are remastered and they are labeled that way. At least that is being honest and admitting that the quality may not be like modern High Definition. The most recent scenes are not yet at the 4K level, but they are really sharp. The site layout is very modern because it is included in the Adult Prime network, which has videos from 86 studios, 17,500 videos and also a pretty good camsite. Pornusers has a good discount and that sweetens the deal. 09-07-21  04:55pm Replies (0) Review 73 Alison Tyler VIP (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Nice size archive with 121 videos and 115 photosets Part of 71 site Puba Network No download limits Nearly all videos can be downloaded in Full High Definition It is easy to search Fast downloads Cons: There are no dates on the videos Alison Tyler has no fan interactions of any kind on the site. There is a link to her Twitter account. Bottom Line: I am not a fan of many pornstars, but Alison Tyler is amazing. I am a tall woman and she is taller than I am at nearly six feet. She is larger than nearly all her costars, both male and female. I would describe her as a sexy voluptuous woman who is very physically fit despite being about 170 pounds. She has a great body at 44D-25-35. The standard pornstar is much smaller, even petite,and quite a bit younger. She breaks the mold both with her larger size as well as her voracious sexuality onscreen. When I was a college student I played sports. Alison rode horses in rodeos, played both college level volleyball and rowed on the crew team. Even now, years later, she goes to the gym seven days a week and is a certified personal trainer. She is a writer of more than 20 sexually explicit novels and hundreds of erotic short stories. Besides that she has a porn career with 300 films and scenes. In 2016, she was nominated for an AVN Award for Best Three Way Sex Scene between a boy/boy/girl. She also has many other industry nominations ranging from sexiest adult star, best boobs, to best porn star website in 2017 for this site. I agree that this site is worthy of an award. I think her strongest scenes are the lesbian ones. In real life she lost her virginity with another woman before she had sex with a man. Many of her scenes are her solo, showing off her body as well as masturbating. Only a relatively few scenes are her with a guy. All of her scenes are fairly hot and are eye catching. Her many fans will not be disappointed. The site has 121 videos and 115 photosets, which makes it good sized for a single model site. The review by Rabbits Reviews three years ago has nearly the same count, so I am not confident it is still adding content. Searching is by an easy to use tag system. Nearly all the videos are available in High Definition and the downloads were fast. As part of the 71 site Puba Network, this is worth joining. Of all the sites available there, I found this to be the best. 09-07-21  04:49pm Replies (0) Review 74 Prime Cups (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A site for the big, nice, boob lovers. 184 scenes and while not updating, there are some 4K scenes so it’s been updated some. A major turn-on for me, most of the cumshots go on the female’s boobs. I want to say these are some of Europe’s biggest name models. I recognize several names including Nekane and Anissa Kate. Pleasing backgrounds and settings with most of the scenes in a house with neutral/white colors. High quality on the videos, downloadable picture sets too Cons: It hasn’t been updated in a year and it looks like they even recycled some OR they remastered some old scenes to HD quality. The newest scenes top out at 720p and 1080p, while a lot of their newer scenes have 4K. It’s one of those sites that seems like it should be bigger than it is like part of the content is gone or missing. Bottom Line: This site doesn’t fool around with any tricks or surprises or gimmicks. These are busty women, many of them are slim built and I do believe all or most are all-natural with no implants. The models are very attractive and I’m going to con this one a little – professional. It’s a complaint I have with the site that I believe is purely subjective and therefore chose not to list it as a con. Some of these models just look bored. The scenes feature full sex, anal sex, oral and some titty-sex, but the scenes with more than one woman, usually the one not getting much attention looks like she would rather be doing anything else. Maybe they are going for that? This is a site that the cumshot shows back up as my favorite part. I love watching how other women react to cum hitting their boobs and bodies. The site’s scene count does seem low to me at only 184 scenes, but I only say that because the site’s first scene was uploaded on December 6, 2005. That’s nearly 16 years and only 184 scenes. It creates some frustration with this site. When it first started they were updating once a week. Only the newest 30 scenes are from the last decade. Which has its positives and negatives to it. I’m learning the European models from a decade ago were quite a bit more attractive to me than the current European models are, but you then have the possibility of poor video quality. I can at least say there’s some good news. At least half of the scenes have at worst 720p and 1080p download options. Some of the newer ones have 4K. Also, so of the older scenes that don’t have 720p or 1080p at least have 540p. I find those still watchable. The oldest scenes drop down into the 384p area and while watchable are just not that good. I find it surprising this site hasn’t updated more or wasn’t more successful than it looks like it was. Nearly every scene has a 4.25 user rating or higher on a 5 scale. And it’s earned. The scenes could be looked at as an opposite of facial scenes. It’s sex that leads to a body cumshot with these very nice boobs taking the center stage. There are some stunning models on this site as well, ones I have never seen or heard of. The scenes are typically long (by current standards), nearing the 40 minute average on most. The tags help more on this site than most, especially depending on your preference. Some of the scenes don’t have any anal or vaginal sex. You can find those with the tags, if the tags are accurate. I do think the possibility of sex happening in some scenes, while others don’t have sex, also makes the site more interesting than your average porn site. You have to watch the scenes. The picture sets are definitely worth looking into. This group or studio seems to be big on quality and it shows in the pictures as much, if not more, than in the videos. These are some of the crispest photos I’ve seen. The score could be and would be a lot higher if there was a reason to believe there will be more of these scenes, but there is a feeling that this site has stopped updating unless they are remastering, which I do have a reason to believe they have done on 4 scenes. The score will reflect both sides of it. I really like the content, the models, and everything that’s going on with the site, but you may only need to join it once to get everything you want. This would be a good place to add the download speeds are good. I have a 100M speed internet and download above average what I do on other sites. 09-07-21  04:46pm Replies (0) Review 75 Cum For Cover (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A site about a lot of cumming men and the women willing to try and use their faces and mouths to catch it. This is going to appeal to those into “almost” bisexual men. It’s also going to appeal to those that like watching women see how fast they can make multiple men cum. There are 98 scenes and I have a feeling I will download all 98 (something I usually don’t do) Very pretty women for this type of porn. I even knew a couple (Veronica Leal and Anastasia Brokelyn) Cons: It seems to be a trend with this group. There are scenes from pre-2008, a large space of nothing, then the scenes started back, causing some inconsistency in the quality. No new updates in 10 months. Bottom Line: I will start with why I said this could appeal to “almost” bisexual male fans. Some of these women aren’t messing around. You stick 5-6 dicks in their face and they’ll stick two, even three of them in their mouth at the same time. You also get the part probably only women notice like when the one guy cums really hard and it hits one of the other guys on accident. Talk about having to work in a dangerous environment. What impresses me most is the length of these scenes. Most are at least 40 minutes long. That means these women are most likely going through these 5-8 guys without any editing and getting all 5-8 of them off. It’s impressive especially when you see how pretty some of the models are. They do not look like they should be in this type of porn. They look more like they should be in softcore porn, being feminine and pretty. But here they are swapping 5-8 dicks in and out of their mouths and hands. A few of the older scenes do have two women in them instead of just one. I believe there’s a market for this niche. There are the women like me who wonders what it would be like to have this many men standing nude in front of me and there are the men who maybe fantasize about being in a group of men having their way with a beautiful woman. I am going to mention the picture sets. These are professional quality photo sets that focus on the model. Those make for a good footnote to the scenes. Just when you’re watching her weave her way through the web of dicks, look back at her clothed picture and how pretty and even innocent she looks. I think this site more than any from this group leaves me wanting more. I have watched these types of scenes from other studios, but these are really good, even the poorer video quality old scenes. These sites could really get away, at least with me, with focusing on remastering their older videos instead of worrying about new updates. The content is that good. You get 98 scenes, there is enough inconsistency in the video quality, I can’t even put a number on how many scenes have 1080p and 720p, I can say 19 have 4K, 1080p and 720p, just glancing over the rest it looks like half of the scenes have 720p and 1080p, those have the little HD badge on them, but they’re mixed up so maybe they have been doing some remastering. It’s a niche I believe has more potential than the porn companies seem to believe. It’s another site that I won’t score too high since it does look like they’re not going to update anymore, but will score high enough to say give it a look. 09-07-21  04:44pm Replies (0) Shown : 51-75 of 237 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.39 seconds.