Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very beautiful lesbian scenes.
800 scenes including a video, photos and screenshots
Videos stream well and can be downloaded (with upgrade $15/mo)
Mostly American models, tattoos, implants and piercings are common. I like tattoos and piercings, don't really care about implants.
Tag system is good, but it can by iffy on accuracy.
Cons:
Hit or miss scenes. It seems like for every good scene there's a bad scene.
Too many ads, when you sign in you are met with a full page ad, every page has multiple small ads on them.
Probably 200 too many scenes. There's obviously a limit on how much you can do with "we live together" and it shows as many scenes feel like you've seen them before -- and you have.
No longer updates.
Bottom Line:
We Live Together has a good reputation as one of the best American lesbian sites and I do think they earn it. It reminds me of when a band that keeps releasing a new album every year hoping to find their magic, but they don't realize they're out of ideas.
There are 800 scenes, that's a lot for a lesbian site and at least 200 of them are excellent, I would estimate 400 of them are okay and would be dependent on if you like the models in the scene. The other 200 feel like retreads.
The story of the scenes is simple. It's two or three, sometimes more than three, young, college age looking models that live together and decide since they share an apartment or home they are going to share themselves with each other.
For my taste in lesbian porn there's too much pussy licking and not enough kissing, touching, fingering. It is sold as the women reacting on a whim to finally try sex with another woman. It's not really that believable that they would jump right in nose up to clit.
The scenes are streaming only unless you pay the $15 upgrade fee. With an upgrade you can download up to 1080p. The tagging system could use some work. One of the tags on the We Live Together site is "cumshot". Another is "blowjob".
The oldest scenes had more of an amateur feel to them and are generally better. They have a couple of women in the earlier years that were regulars. I would think that would have been the direction they would have liked this site to have. You could have shown how the progression to trying lesbian sex turned into more then you could have had something like one of the women cheating on her girlfriend with a guy.
My feeling towards it might not sound as positive as it is. I just felt like the scenes were becoming stale and dull. It's a very good lesbian site. Is it possible for a porn site to pigeonhole itself too much? That's the feeling here.
The models aren't the problem. Even in the newer scenes they have some really pretty models. I think it's well above average, but it's not quite into the elite area.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Young, cute, college-aged, pretty lesbian sex.
More hardcore in some scenes than I expected.
Scenes are mostly over 30 minutes, with some nearing one hour, good stories and setup.
There are subtitles, but the scenes I watched are speaking English. They do have other language subtitles too.
Updates twice per month, currently 468 scenes with downloadable videos and downloadable pictures.
The video quality is excellent. All scenes have at least 1080p, with the newer ones having 4K.
Cons:
I listed the more hardcore scenes as a pro, but they do a very good job on the more softer, teasing style scenes. I don’t know if they should just try sticking to one way or the other.
The older scenes include some solo which I’m not really into with these young models. They are not very sensual by themselves.
Bottom Line:
I have a love/hate relationship with the younger female models porn scenes. I have tried multiple teen sites and find myself bored with the solo scenes of these models who don’t even give me the idea they know what they’re even doing. It could be nerves or shyness, but that’s the hate side of it for me. When you put two or three (a lot of these scenes have more than 2 females) females together you at least get a little more sensuality and even aggressiveness from them.
There is some inconsistency from scene to scene. I don’t know if they maybe alternate producers or writers, but some of the scenes are so good they make some of the other scenes seem poor. One of the best scenes I have seen is their newest one. It is two college young women watching a movie and they decide to masturbate together. I think they could have stopped there and the scene would have been great. Instead, it turns into a lesbian scene where the action doesn’t replace the eroticism lost from them masturbating together. I am being critical of a job I wouldn’t want to have. I wouldn’t want to decide this is when you all are going to stop being innocent and become horny nymphos. That scene is stuck in my head. They started out, believably nervous about even masturbating together, then 10 minutes later, they were in full 69 and going at it like pros. I haven’t been in that situation so I don’t know if it would progress that quickly.
The models are very pretty and cute. There’s some ethnic diversity. The production is very good. The stories are believable. The sex is even believable, but not to the level that I would believe these are real lesbians. I’m not even for sure that’s what they want you to believe. The scenes rely more on tease, seduction, which would be more in the realm of bicurious or even straight becoming bicurious.
The video quality is close to as good as I think you can get. They have downloads from 160p up to 1080p on all 468 scenes, with around 40-50 of the scenes having 4K. The most enjoyable part for me -- and it goes back to the young ages, is everything that happens before the pussy licking starts. The kissing, touching, and masturbating together, I like that style with these younger models. There are a few things I haven’t seen much of and those include strap-ons or tribadism. The writers could convince me the young models do not know about tribadism, but it does seem strap-ons with young models would be commonplace.
The site would score higher with more consistency. It jumps from three college young women being silly and playful to two college young women being serious and showing similar to real feelings of love. There’s the inconsistency of being near hardcore in one scene to softcore in the next. That may be subjective to me since it does give some variety, but it does seem like the women I want to see do the hardcore, stick with the softcore and the ones I want to see doing softcore do the more hardcore scenes. That definitely is subjective and should detract from the overall content. It’s a great lesbian site and the stories along with production and high technical quality push it up my list as one of the better lesbian sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Updates added once a week
The site has almost 550 videos and photosets
Uses a great many tags for searching
All the scenes are exclusive
Comes with four other sites
Videos can be downloaded in eight options and the most recent include 4K
Cons:
Some of the tags are confusing
The site layout needs improving. The non-member tour is easier to use than the member's area. It's the same content from the tour but they have it laid out in a way that becomes confusing.
Bottom Line:
When I was living in India, I developed a fetish for pissing. We don’t have the best public hygiene and seeing a man urinating outdoors is not uncommon. For women, this would be extremely taboo and pretty much unimaginable. Although this site has its main concept of seeing women pissing, it is done indoors and as a kind of surrogate for sex. The women see pissing as a sex act in a way. I think it is fair to say that the pee is treasured as if it were a man’s cum and makes these women do things with it that help them reach orgasm. Well, maybe I should say a porn fake orgasm as these women are all acting out a fantasy and do it for a paycheck. These are stars I have seen before on other sites and even on the other four sites within the Puffy Network that is included with your membership.
The women are for the most part, pretty and thin Eastern European models that don’t talk. Instead, their actions speak for them. They play to the camera and seem to be acting out what a director is looking for them to do more than out of any spontaneous passion. That makes me feel a bit left out of the scene as I would have preferred that they were a bit more original and believable. For me the best pissing videos are showing a forbidden act. For the site the women see themselves as putting on a show for men who want to see pissing acts that are a lot more than just a biological relief.
One example of that is when you click on the models list, you get thumbnails of their faces as you would expect, but you also get a picture in picture smaller shot of their pussy with piss coming out. There seems to be a desire for acts that are striking visually and are in their own way a bit extreme. For the most part you get stripping and showing off her body, just like most male focused porn and then a bit of toys, dildos, etc. to get her in the mood or you see her pissing and doing all kinds of things with the piss. She drinks it, pours it over herself, licks it up from the floor, pees in her clothes and then squeezes the piss into her mouth or licking toys covered in piss.
The tags are extensive and many of them are perfect for the niche. Sometimes I felt overwhelmed by how many there are and was confused by the differences between them. Sometimes the tags felt overlapping and maybe even redundant. You can see for yourself as these are just a few and I don’t think this is even close to a complete list of the tags that are piss focused. Clothed pissing, clothing mopping, golden shower, licking up piss, licking toys, peeing, piss drinking, piss play, pissing, pissing during insertion, pissing in glass, pissing in pants, pissing on self, piss spitting, pussy wash, standing pee, sucking on clothing, wet and messy, watersports, wet, wet hair, wet toy, wet panties.
This is a shortened description of one of the better scenes. Keira stands up before she starts pissing into her panties. Her stream trickles through the fabric and her denims, then strips out of them to mop up her pee from the floor using her panties. Squeezing her piss in the panties into her mouth, she climbs up onto the table and fingers her pussy. She gushes all over the table, then leans over, lapping up her pee. Next, she holds a glass vase underneath her and pees right into it before pouring it into her mouth and all over her face, going down her body. She uses her fingers as she brings herself to orgasm.
The videos have as many as eight download options including 4K and there are two for the photo sets, which are not worth bothering with. Updates come once a week and the archive is huge for a specialized fetish site with about 550 videos. Not only are all the scenes exclusive, I can’t think of any pissing site I can compare it to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone.
Cons:
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A very varied hardcore network with 4,512 scenes
Video quality is very good on 75% of the videos.
They cater to all sexual orientations: lesbian, transsexuals, bisexuals and heterosexuals.
The site is easy and simple to use.
There is the feeling there’s something for everyone here, also very good blend of races and ethnicities.
Cons:
Looks like it stopped updating last year, but it does have 4,512 scenes on it.
No 4K that I have seen, but a large amount of the scenes have 1080p.
With this much variety you’re going to see something you probably don’t want to see like a 63 year old woman being gangbanged.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those networks that escaped me. Or maybe I escaped it? I love seeing varying content, risky content, and anything that just goes away from the status quo, but there are cons to this like the last con I listed. If you’re not sure what to expect from this network, I’m going to list some of the recent names of the DVDs these scenes are from. I do assume these are from DVDs. The scenes have a name and scene number. We will start with “Trans Brats”, then move on to “I Heart 10 Inch White Boys”. Should that be white cocks or white dicks? The woman loves a 10 inch tall man? Then there’s, “Trans Women Reform School”, “Going Bareback for Tgirls”, “Dreaming of a Trans Monster Cock” which progresses to “Cum Taste My Tgirl Monster Cock”. I then found, “Supermodel Sluts” and “I had Sex with a Black Man”. The always needed, “40 Year Old Size Queens”. Just when I thought we were back to normal porn there’s, “Cuckold Diaries” and I’m sorry for laughing, “White Kong Dong”. As varied as this is, they just couldn’t stop there and delivered “Grandmas who Love to Fuck” and took the overused, but still enjoyable stepfamily porn to all new levels with, “My Stepmom’s Cock”. They even have a DVD series called, “Bushy Beavers”. All of those are just on the first page of what is a 76 page site.
That, to me, is the selling point of this site. If you’re just burnt out on the same type of repetitive porn scene, I can almost guarantee you that’s not going to be a problem on this site, but you will have to be open-minded enough to see grandmas who love to fuck and find out about someone’s stepmom having a cock.
The impressiveness of the variety is easily shown. They have 513 lesbian scenes and some of those are really good. They have 909 transsexual scenes and 3,255 straight scenes. Those straight scenes include anal, threesomes, gangbangs and really every niche you can name.
I don’t know that I would expect high video quality considering these are sourced from DVDs, but at least 75% of the scenes have 140p up to 1080p download options on them. The scenes do have photos and they are downloadable, but some of the sets only have 10 or less photos in them. It is difficult to pin down a certain genre or what to expect. Unless I just say, “hardcore sex”. That does seem to be the theme in nearly every scene. There are some solo transsexual scenes which I was very happy to see.
The site considering how varied, is really easy to use and makes good use of the lesbian, transsexual, straight tags/settings. I have noticed there’s not much story to the scenes even though they are part of DVDs. I thought that could be a reason for the scenes to have a continuing story from scene to scene, but I guess that’s just Vivid that does that. I don’t know how easy or likely it is for me to recommend this site. It’s definitely different in the type of content, but the scenes mostly feel rushed and with no story it defeats the purpose of naming and numbering the scenes. It is worth checking out if you like a very broad mix of niches.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of petite women, which fits well with a niche of very young women
Amazing download speeds that I have not experienced on other sites
The members’ area is just fantastic with features I did not expect
The videos have technical quality such as 6K and 60 frames per second
Should have a broad appeal to women, men and couples
Sign up promo of pay for one month and get one month free and you also get three other large sites for an even better deal.
Vendo is a well known biller. You can even pay with cryptocurrency.
There are no download limits as far as I know
Cons:
Not much variety in age, body shape or ethnicity of the models.
Young models can sometimes be a problem with shyness or even losing interest mid-scene.
Bottom Line:
This is the main site in a network of four sites. The others are All Fine Girls, Wow Porn and Ultra Films, which has a separate log in but is included in your membership. The site has been updating with a new video or photo set just about every day.
The models are Eastern Europeans for the most part, as well as thin and petite. In contrast with American sites there would be a bit more variety as to age, ethnicity and body types. But the models they do have are outstandingly beautiful and I love seeing them. I think young and having first or at least early sexual experiences with that as a theme makes me hot. I think that is true for a lot of women.
There are a few pros that are found on many other sites and some are among my favorites. Apolonia LaPiedra is one of these and my new found love is Serina Gomez. As much as I love blondes, I also love that extra spice that these two bring. But the stars are not the only ones that make the site sizzle. The hundreds of unknowns or barely known hotties are the essence of youthful sexiness.
The ladies have a lot of the 1200 scenes enjoying the company of their male counterparts. Many of the cumshots are quite impressive and external. Somebody on this site figured out that we women love to see cumshots explode. They also have many solo scenes that show them exploring how to get their young bodies to give them believable orgasms and there are also scenes that show that another common female fantasy, exploring with another young lady. Mostly they are portrayed as friends, and that seems to me to be real enough.
About half of the scenes can be downloaded in 4K. About 85 are in 6K. I am not at the level of feeling a need for that kind of quality, but maybe one day I may go and buy myself a gift. Porn this good looks great at high definition 1080p, so try to imagine 6K. The site says it remastering 1080p to 4K quality and some 4K to 6K.
The site uses filters and there are many. The tags are very helpful and many of the videos have a tag as to who they were filmed by. I did not recognize the names of the filmers, but if I knew them I could have favorites. I hope you noticed I did not say directors or producers as the women seemingly are allowed to be free and go with what comes naturally. Sometimes they are a bit awkward and don’t know what to do, but that does eliminate that by the numbers feel common in so much porn today.
In addition to tags and filters, you can sort by most viewed, most commented on, most watched and of course latest. About half of the videos offer an option of 30 frames per second or 60. Much of the porn on most sites is either 25 or 30. Sixty is rare. If a scene is rather slow moving or static, you may not notice much difference. Where the difference matters is in a scene that has a lot of motion. If the performers get into the sex and show it, you would prefer to watch in 60fps.
You have the choice of searching for the scenes that are only in this site, or you can search across the network. However, Ultra Films has a separate log in so you can only search within the one site. I saw another feature that has a big appeal to me. They have photo sets, but I did not see screenshots. There is a way to make your own though. Instead of screenshots, they have a page with the option to download or stream from a specific point. You can grab your own screenshots or stream or download these minute or so clips. There are some favorite parts, admit it, yes there are, after all who, male or female does not like to see the cumshot? You can watch it in a loop.
I loved the scene titles too. Who could resist Flame of Lust, Feeling the Orgasm, or Slutty Dreams Come True? I may be nitpicking, but I wish they had scene descriptions to enhance the raw sex appeal.
The sex seems to be what young people would prefer to do, not extreme like on so many sites. I think there is much here that women would enjoy as well as men and couples. In a world with so much boring porn, this site stands out.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many of the women are so pretty that I can’t imagine they are real
No extra charge for downloads
Comes with three other similar sites that are still updating
About half of the scenes have a 4K option for downloads and most also have a 60fps option. Some are offered in 6K. The 6K file sizes are less than the 4K ones.
There are lots of real orgasms in the lesbian scenes.
I loved the extensive use of subtitles. We get an insight into the personalities of the many Eastern European models who don’t speak English.
Cons:
The site has not updated since 2019 and there is a huge archive of well over 3800 videos and 5700 photo sets. I did not go through all of these in a month, let alone you also get much more on the other sites that are included.
This may be a plus for some members as the photo sets are very glamorous and artistic. This is not really my taste.
Bottom Line:
he name of the site is a great example of truth in advertising. This porn is WOW. It is not often that the quality of a porn site has me in awe. There is almost nothing that I could ask for that this site does not already do well. The first thing I noticed is that there is a sale price that includes a second month for free. This site is large, but it is no longer updating. The value of getting a month for free is that the other three sites it comes with are still growing.
The models are mostly Eastern Europeans and I did not expect them to talk. The site found a way to get around that by having subtitles so you can see the models’ personalities come across anyway. They range from simply gorgeous to drop dead gorgeous. Without the subtitles, you would not know how playful they can be. The verbal interactions with their costars are a big part of why the scenes work so well.
The site has the usual boy/girl hardcore. As you might expect, there are as well some great solo scenes where the models masturbate or show off how sexy they can be when they get a chance to freely explore their sexual sides. For me, the scenes that I preferred by far were the many lesbian ones. The scenes with two women I felt worked best and the ones with a group seemed to me to be more directed. I like unrehearsed porn and scenes with two models seem so much more likely to happen in real life.
What you see are two women starting off slowly and affectionately. There is a lot of kissing with tongues exploring the partner’s mouth, as well as breast stimulation. The scenes that moved on to kissing the partner’s inner thighs got me anxious to see more. The interactions had a natural progression to them and moved along faster as the foreplay got more and more passionate. The site has a choice of downloads of 30 frames per second and 60. The difference is that 60 is noticeably better at scenes with a lot of movement. The hotter the sex, the more energetic, the more 60 fps is the better choice.
Another thing I liked in these scenes is that for once, us women get the benefit of POV, the action from the point of view of the receiver. Most porn has a guy getting a blow job in a POV scene, but here you get to see the energetic pussy licking or taking labia in her mouth and gently caressing them. It turns me on just to think about this. In the scenes with toys, they are not huge and some stimulate her clit as well as penetrate her. The orgasms that work best are the ones with a wand as well as pussy licking. Every scene that I have watched has orgasms that look genuine and never faked. Some are so explosive that they are truly a testament to just how well porn can be made.
There are no scene descriptions and that leads me to a minor con. There are no trailers either. Between the tags and the categories, you get a feel for what to expect. Where I would have expected a few screenshots taken from the videos, you can download just selected scenes from a page with the options of 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. Maybe you want just the cumshot in a boy girl scene as an example. Maybe the deep tongue kissing in a lesbian scene is one you may want to watch in a loop after you have downloaded it.
Many of the scenes have an option of 4K and that is not too shabby for a site that has not updated in over two years. I saw that some scenes are being recoded so that 6K is an option. Because they use HEVC (High Efficiency Video Codec), the scenes that are 6K have smaller file sizes than the 4K. Those 6K scenes work with VLC player if you don’t have a 5K or higher monitor. What I also like about VLC is that you can make your own screenshots. For me, I am sticking with 1080p as an option as I don’t have a monitor large enough to see the difference. However, I appreciate that the site offers state of the art quality if you ae looking for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Surprisingly large and diverse network.
There are 11 sites included in the network.
By their count there are 2,676 scenes.
Some unique and strange porn which is why I guess it's named WTF Pass.
The newer scenes on the network have 720p and 1080p quality downloads.
Some of this content is too strange to make up or pass up.
Cons:
No scenes have dates on them and there's no reason to believe any of it is updating.
Strange isn't always a good thing.
Feels like a cheap version of major networks takes on reality porn.
Bottom Line:
This was not as bad as I was expecting. I found interest in several sites and also felt like some of the sites are just blatant cheap ripoffs of bigger, mainstream sites. Below are the sites that come with the network and their number of scenes:
If you are like me the first one that really caught your eye was Panda Fuck. This is a site featuring a stuffed Panda Bear that I believe a man is in. The women masturbate and have "sex" with the panda's foot long dildo or cucumber. The Art Porn looks a lot like Sex Art and X-Art, it also has scenes that are named in ways to make me believe they have updated somewhat recently like, "Quarantined With Hot Girlfriend".
What does impress me about the network is this looks to be all-amateur. In some ways, it reminds me of Teen Mega World or maybe Porn Pros. Some of the scenes do feel generic, but I do believe the amateur aspect helps in that regard. They have a lot of outdoor, exhibitionism, voyeurism scenes too.
A few things to make note of the scene counts on some of the sites is lower than it says. College Fuck Parties which is a good site has older scenes that are split into 4-6 parts. There is a model list and it lists them having almost 800 models. My guessing that it's amateur is based on me not recognizing any of the models. It does look like the prettiest models are on their site The Art Porn. The age of the models is a lot of 18-20 year olds and I haven't seen one over 24.
I do think it's an okay join especially if you like outdoor, orgies and public porn. Nothing really stands out and that's the same feeling I had about Teen Mega World. I would not be surprised if this content is related to TMW. I was debating trying it since I do like orgies. When I was signing up, I noticed a nice surprise, the price was only $8. That probably helped me make the decision to give it a try. There is definitely better porn out there, but if you're looking for something with a sense of humor and even foolishness, this network does a good job on those parts.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hardcore site that features pretty, young female models.
Premium quality on videos with up to 4K on newer videos, picture sets have zips
Unlimited downloads on videos and picture zips.
174 scenes with 2-3 updates per month.
Good price for everything you get.
Cons:
I don’t know why this word came to my mind while watching these scenes -- benign.
No emotion, no dialogue, no stories.
Some of the most formulaic scenes I have seen.
Bottom Line:
The girls on this site are very pretty, thin to average build and have very little personality. The word benign comes to mind as I see this as non-offensive porn. I don’t think porn needs to be offensive, but this is the type of porn that you would expect either a very young person to like (just because the models are naked) or possibly an older person who hasn’t been exposed to much porn. I was expecting more and maybe 10 years ago a site like this would have been a breath of fresh air. Instead, it is hanging by a thread for its life just based on the looks of the models.
The site isn’t a decent sized site with 174 scenes with a video and photo set for each scene. The update schedule is only okay with 2-3 updates per month. The videos are not very long. I haven’t seen one yet that is longer than 25 minutes and all are at least 20 minutes. That doesn’t help with the feeling that these scenes are formulaic. When you watch four scenes and they are 21-23 minutes with the same order of positions you start to feel like what’s the point? They do try to add other elements to the scenes. One scene is supposed to be a married man having sex with his stepdaughter in the same bed her nude mom is asleep in. Some try to incorporate forms of very light and tame bondage. It doesn’t change the formula. You could potentially say there’s some humor in the scenes. The one with the stepdad and stepdaughter having sex in the same bed as the girl’s nude mom shows the stepdad shushing the stepdaughter, but doing nothing about the bed squeaking and moving.
I think when you start noticing things like that it just shows the porn itself is not keeping your attention. I can see how and why men would be into this. The models look very young (18-22), they have nice bodies, pretty faces and most of them are even flexible. This is one of those sites that feels like it was made for men to watch. I can’t complain about the quality, nearly half of the videos have 4K, the rest have 1080p as the top option. They also offer 720p and 480p. The photo sets could be better. They are smaller in size than most sites of this type with most of the photos just being screen captures.
All and all, I couldn’t recommend it by itself, but it does include a full network with it that makes it a good value for your money, especially at the low price it is offered at.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Four very specific sites in 1 network, Erotica X, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Over 1,300 scenes on the 4 sites combined and the network updates once per day.
461 models, all are professional models.
Site works well, you can view the newest content from the network page which shows content from all 4 sites or you can go directly to one of the sites.
Quality is very high and videos have 8 download options, up to 4K on newer scenes.
Photo sets are downloadable.
Cons:
I have joined a lot of Gamma sites and always thought their cancellation process was very easy. Not this one, I entered my login and solved the captcha, it said I had to call to verify my account. I chose to chat and was on the chat for nearly 20 minutes.
The scenes on these 4 sites are some of the most redundant I have seen. I'm not saying they are bad, but I think there's a script and a timer that buzzes to switch positions.
Bottom Line:
I was feeling positive about this network when I first joined it. I still am positive about it, but it started to feel like a letdown the further I got into the membership.
The four site format sounds like a good idea, but there's very little balance between the sites. Hard X has 664 scenes on it, Erotica X has just over 300, Lesbian X has just under 140 and Dark X has just over 200. I think it's for good reason too.
The Hard X and Erotica X scenes seem to have more time and thought put into them. Dark X is a lot like Blacked, but not as good. Lesbian X is a lot like Sapphic Erotica, but not nearly as good. Those sites are still updating, but you can see they are not their focus as a network and are not their strength.
All of the content on all 4 sites has a very sameness feel to them. The earliest scenes on Hard X almost look like a completely different site. Hard X is the best of the 4 sites even though it has a sameness from scene to scene in newer scenes. Erotica X looks to have the potential, but maybe they change producers? You will get 2-3 good scenes in a row, then 2-3 scenes that aren't even worth clicking on. And those are the two stronger sites of the 4.
I was talking to another PU member that is also a member and we both said the scenes feel like watching a cooking show. They roll the cookies out (position change), they put the cookies in oven (change position), they remove the cookies from the oven (change position) and they eat the cookies (cumshot). It is that timed and specific.
It doesn't make it bad. It just makes it feel like the scenes have very little thought going into them or effort. It makes the success of each scene dependent on the models in the scene. There are some with models that are excellent and seem to enjoy every minute of the sex while there are some that look like they are waiting on the buzzer to go off to change positions.
The videos are excellent quality to download. I didn't really like their streaming player. I used it 5 times and had multiple buffering moments in each scene. I don't think it was an internet problem, but it could have been. The newer scenes are available in up to 4K resolution (still waiting on Santa to bring me a 4K monitor), they look good enough to watch on 720p and even better at 1080p. The photo sets are not Met-Art or DDF quality, but they are okay and can be downloaded.
There's just an overall feeling of "it's okay" and that's how I feel about it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I joined through Doc Squirt, but believe this is the network’s main site. I will try explaining it since it’s confusing. As a full network it has some good content.
Currently shows 8 updates over the last 7 days.
The model list only works for the entire network and there are 170 models.
If you select the alternate biller link it is CCBill
Poor navigation won’t allow an accurate count on scenes, but from what I’m piecing together there are around 400 scenes total with most having 4K video option.
Videos are downloadable, I wondered since the name “feeds”, but they are downloadable and I see nothing about limits.
Some improving (though cliche) stories in the newer scenes. Some scenes have subtitles, others do not.
Cons:
The navigation will have you going in circles. If you go to “latest” it brings up a scene that was posted 1 week ago. If you go to the Xfeeds link it says 8 scenes have been released in the last week.
The main screen shows the 9 newest scenes. To get to the older ones you have to jump from site link to site link and even then you don’t know if you’re seeing everything. The category search which has 7 generic options at least is one way to get to the majority of the scenes.
For some reason the site logs me out anytime I close the page even if I click “remember me”.
Bottom Line:
When I first joined this network through Doc Squirt, I started to realize the XFeed.net site was the main site. I can’t say in what experience I have with porn sites, I have been on a porn site with navigation like this one. They list having Doc Squirt, Slim4K, MyTinyWish and DudCast. But some of the newer scenes start off with the name “My Dirty Novels”. Those are the improved scenes. Yet, there’s no link to go to for just the My Dirty Novels scenes.
The problem with the navigation includes con #2, going to any of the listed sites separately, including Xfeed.net, only shows you 9 scenes. Doc Squirt and DudCast have a “see more” button to see all of their scenes. But if you put the scenes together for Doc Squirt, DudCast, MyTinyWish it’s not even 75 total. Those 3 show all their scenes. The other around 300-400 scenes are found by going through the categories. Those categories with their number of scenes for those interested are:
Squirt with 27 scenes, Creampie with 62 scenes, Anal in 206 scenes, Threesome in 69 scenes, DP with 22 scenes, Hardcore with 249 and Cumshots with 389. That is the only plainly clear way to find the scenes as far as I can tell.
They do offer 4K, 1080p and 720p on nearly all of their videos except the Doc Squirt ones -- those top out at 1080p.
There are subtitles on the Dudcast scenes, but I haven’t seen any subtitles on the other scenes. It would seem like those would be most useful in the My Dirty Novels scenes since there is a story. Instead, the story is just listed in the scene description. There are pretty and cute models in nearly every scene. And if their update schedule is true, they are updating more than nearly all sites I have been on lately, but the navigation is going to make it frustrating for most to use and the inconsistencies from site to site makes it even more frustrating. When you use the categories search you don’t know which of their sites the scene is from so if you wanted subtitles, you have no way to know until you either stream or download it.
It’s a decent choice (for the price) if you are into hardcore sex with teens. Those newest scenes are trying to bring an edgier feel to the scenes with swinger type scenarios. One of the newest scenes is my favorite scene I watched, the name of it isn’t the best translation, “Shy cutie tries sex with a couple.” A shy young woman would hop into bed with a couple? There’s just some confusion, possibly bad translations (including in the subtitles) and all those navigation problems are stopping it from being a better network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with the entire Dogfart network consisting of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
I noted this based on past reviews, I believe they have started updating this interracial lesbian site again.
88 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
137 female models on this site.
Updates once per month.
Cons:
They have definitely had some downtime when it comes to updating. The site’s first scene was posted in 2007 and they only have 88 scenes total.
The 4K versions of the newer videos cost $4 each.
It’s another of their sites that seems to get a lot of positive comments from their users, but they only update it once per month.
Bottom Line:
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
Nia Nacci’s performance in a Cum Bang scene led to me looking for more of her content. I rarely search out specific women, but her performance brought out the “best” in the men. It seems she does just as well with women as the newest scene on Zebra Girls is Nia Nacci with Kyler Quinn. The site sticks with the interracial format which I would think would be easy to book models for.
The scenes are standard lesbian scenes with oral, anal licking, nipple sucking, kissing, strap-ons and maybe the interracial part is something I don’t really notice as a native of India. I’m kind of in-between the colors. The scenes are good. There’s not a lot of creativity especially in the older scenes, but the newer scenes not only add creativity, they also are longer scenes too. The newest scenes are closer to 40 minutes, while the older ones are 20-25 minutes. The same problem with the video quality is on this site too. There are older scenes that say HD, but are only 480p, with a few being 720p. There’s the $4 charge for 4K scenes. I have a 4K monitor now and would like to see that Nia Nacci with Kyler Quinn scene in 4K, but $4 is nearly ⅓ what I paid for the full membership.
This site along with Cum Bang, We Fuck Black Girls and Gloryhole Iniations are easily my favorite sites on the network. Of those four they deliver a total of 4 updates combined per month. While Blacks on Blondes gets 4 updates per month just on it. This site would interest me as a standalone site if they updated it more often. Maybe they should look into trying that similar to how Team Skeet does? They could even add 4K videos and charge $15 per site. It’s a good, nearly great site on a network that’s treading water to stay above average.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
