Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Ladyboy Vice
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Asian transsexuals with a bondage twist and domination.
The scenes do a very good job of creating atmospheres typical of Thailand, closed in, small areas. There are handcuffs, leashes, chains. It’s a change I believe transsexual porn needs.
Download options could be better but at least they have downloads. I only am seeing 1080p and 480p.
A lot of pissing, especially the male into the ladyboy’s mouth. There are some with the ladyboy’s mouth stretched open with a device. I will have to explain later in the review.
Very cute and pretty ladyboys. That is the selling point to ladyboy porn, for me. A lot of these ladyboys are more feminine than the female models I see on American porn sites.
The tags seem accurate and are needed. |
| Cons: |
This site’s last update is listed as December 2021. I don’t know that is even true. I have been a member before, but do not remember Ladyboy Vice. I would remember this site as someone that likes the pissing fetish. They are not actively recycling old scenes. There have been no new updates in 2 months.
I’m being honest and trying to be helpful with this part. If you’re claustrophobic, some of the scenes could upset that. Some look like they are in a closet. It is filmed in Thailand. I know that’s a strange con or warning, but I felt closed in watching some of these scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has been one of my favorite Ladyboy networks for several years. I try to join it every year at least once. I do not have much experience with this specific site. I am not a pissing fetishist. But I like it. I know I would remember this if I saw it before. Transsexual and ladyboy doesn’t have a lot of difference. The main part as far as I know is Ladyboys are Asian. I do think goes into Transgender. These ladyboys do not look like they have any male DNA. They have a dick. Everything else is feminine. Their frames are tiny. You can tell these ladyboys like to dress up and be pretty and sexy. They wear hose, stockings, it’s just not the same feeling I get when I watch transsexual or shemale porn.
All of the transsexual types face a problem in porn. It doesn’t matter if you’re on the most expensive transsexual porn site. The scenes have zero creativity. You get solo and it’s a solo scene. You get scenes with men or women. It’s a sex scene. There’s hardly no story, no props, no build-up, no tension. A site like this, Ladyboy Vice, adds a very welcome element. There is bondage, chains, leashes, gags, handcuffs, the closed in rooms and the pissing. I don’t think I have seen many transsexuals or ladyboy sites with pissing. This is new ground to me.
There is clear uncomfortableness for some of the models. The males in these scenes look American or maybe German. Bigger built men. The ladyboys look on average to be maybe 5’1” 105 pounds. Some are bigger but is easy notice the size difference between the male and the ladyboy. I think that adds a lot to the bondage, chains parts.
The site is a good-sized site with around 260 scenes. Those can only be downloaded in an HD file or Mobile. It doesn’t tell the resolution. The ones I have downloaded are at a minimum of 720p. Those are the scenes showing as 2015. You at least get 720p. The newer ones are 1080p. That’s the only you get other than the mobile. Some of these scenes are large. There are no pictures. I don’t think that’s a surprise or letdown. It looks hard to enough to film in these tight rooms they are in.
I said this is my favorite style of transsexuals. The ladyboys, to me, really blur that gender line. It’s not as common for these models to have implants. They are taking hormones. They’re not big enough or have enough flesh to even have implants. It’s like watching the teen American sites. With the slim build. I find nearly all of these ladyboys very attractive. I do think you will be disappointed if you’re expecting large dicks from the ladyboys. Some have maybe average or above size.
I will end with the bondage parts are not that rough. It seems closer to playful. The pissing is very explicit. I do think the part that will bother people the most is the claustrophobic feeling of some of the scenes. Very good site. I like it a lot. It’s good to see at least someone doing something other than regular sex with the transsexual. |
|
02-08-22 06:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Ladyboy.xxx
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly solo Ladyboy site.
Nearly 2,000 scenes with 3 updates per week.
Over 750 models, the models here are either all Asian or it's close to all, a few look possibly Indian (some consider Indians to be Asian).
Site navigates well and easy join/cancel system through the site's own biller.
Advanced search is the most comprehensive search I have seen on a TS site.
Currently includes 2 other previously standalone sites which I also am reviewing. See first con. |
| Cons: |
It's more expensive than advertised. It's listed as $29.95 on TBP and Porn Users, a few other sites list it as $20.99, but no matter where you go through, the price is $36.95. I do believe it has to do with them including two very good standalone sites (Ladyboy Ladyboy and Asian American Ladyboys).
I don't like the way the site is laid out. Upon signing in you are taken to what looks like a blog. It lists comments by the owners of the site. Updates. It's too much to read through to get to the content. They do have tabs to switch to models and updates. Which is what I am used to seeing when I sign in on a site.
I reviewed the main Grooby site last month and all 3 of these I am reviewing this month are also Grooby sites. I do not think they worry about the quality of each scene or even quality of models. I really like this site a lot better than the main Grooby site, but there are scenes here that just are not appealing. |
| Bottom Line: |
Last month, I was a little negative about the main Grooby site. The Grooby sites say they were the original TS sites online and I believe that. The amount of content is not only surprising, but the amount of sites they have is too. I feel like they own half of the entire TS online porn genre. I do think it brings up the quantity/quality debate. The scenes on Ladyboy.xxx are almost all solo. There are some scenes in the older episodes with a man with the Ladyboy, but I did join for the solo scenes. The advanced search brings a different quality to this site. You can select basic choices like "dick size", if you are looking for hardcore action, you can also select that in the advanced search, there are around 50 hardcore scenes total. You can even select Ladybody with female or Ladyboy with male in the advanced search.
There really isn't any story whatsoever in the scenes. Most of the videos are under 20 minutes and just feature a solo model masturbating until orgasm. The models on this site are better overall -- to me, than on the main Grooby site. This site goes into the attraction of boobs and hard dicks. I do think this genre is as aimed at women as men or anyone that's looking for something different the average porn scene offers. There is a downside to these cuter, even prettier Asian models, there's almost no dialogue. I believe it gives the scenes a clinical feel. Someone turns the camera on, the model starts masturbating with little to no noise, she orgasms, the camera turns off. Maybe that could be attributed to how long Grooby has been in business? They have been doing it so long it's easy and they just cruise through the scenes.
I would make a direct comparison of this site to watching the girls on Nubiles.net masturbate. There does seem to be some shyness, maybe even timid and you get some scenes that while realistic, make me feel like the model is a little uncomfortable.
The quality of the videos is as good as I have seen on TS sites. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. They have photo sets for each scene that you can download in zips and they also have screenshots in zips you can download. It is very hard to fault their content. If I had a personal complaint it is a very subjective one that some of the models just aren't attractive. Is it possible that TS content maybe has a higher standard on looks than straight content? While I enjoy the TS solo sets it is because there aren't enough solo male masturbation sites. That would make it seem like I want to see masculine TS, but I don't. I want to see the most feminine looking TS. Other than that, when combining the excellent quality, easy and expansive navigation, this is a site I would recommend to any TS fan or even to straight women interested in watching a dick be masturbated. |
|
09-09-20 02:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
Ladyboys Fucked Bareback
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large ladyboy site that I’m not for sure if it’s updating, even though it shows a January 2022 update.
Good site for people to get their first experience with ladyboys.
There are 4K downloads available, but it’s why I have a red flag about the new updates. A few of those do not have 4K while the older updates do.
It almost makes me blush to say, the biggest dicks I have seen on ladyboys besides someone like Long Mint.
Fairly kinky scenes, no condoms, a lot of rimming and the males in the scenes are mostly attractive too.
There are 483 scenes on this site. It does show new updates. I haven’t been a member for two years. I can’t really go back to the downloads I have and see how much if any is recycled. |
| Cons: |
Just based on the name you’re not going to get much solo action which is my preference and you’re not going to get the ultra-rare ladyboys with a female.
The oldest scenes are from 2009 and those are very small resolution. I believe maybe 360p. The older scenes are not really worth the hassle. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a highly recommended site for males that are interested in transsexuals. The ladyboys, in my opinion, are an easier place to start. There is a more feminine side to the ladyboys. The one glaring problem I see is the implants are very noticeable. It looks kind of like most American porn sites. I do not mind as much. I would love to see these ladyboys in solo. Some of these ladyboys on this site are probably more in the range of 5-7 inches in dick length. There are much better erections than you see on a lot of ladyboy sites. I do not have the knowledge of how this all works in the porn industry. These ladyboys remind me more of slimmer, smaller framed transsexuals. I don’t believe they’re taking a lot of hormone therapy. I’m not for sure these ladyboys cross that transgender line like a lot of ladyboys do.
One of the scenes listed as a newer update has the model DeeDee in it. The model names on these sites are terrible to say the least. They do the same name with a number behind it like Patty 3, Emmy 4. I believe Long Mint, one of the best known ladyboys is on this site. She’s likely listed as Mint. It is a very large site with nearly 500 scenes. There’s nothing resembling a story or plot in these scenes. There’s not a lot of kinkiness other than the bareback part. You don’t see hardly any ladyboy topping the male on this site. That’s where the site’s age shows. It’s why some of the other sites I reviewed show a progression and some creativity. The best part about these scenes is looking at the pretty ladyboys with the big dicks. I hate to reduce myself to that, but it is the selling point of this site. I find it very arousing when the ladyboy is in reverse cowgirl and her hard dick is pointing straight up and not moving.
That is why I think this is a good place to start. It’s not going to require the viewer to enjoy anything other than seeing people aroused. Even with the risk of becoming repetitive and dull from scene to scene, the one part that saves it is the ladyboy. I have learned about size perception. I know that Long Mint herself has talked about she has a very large dick, but she’s also tiny. It makes her dick look even bigger than it really is. She showed her hand size, and it was more like a female’s hand. You see those scenes with her and you’re really looking at a small female’s hand around that erect dick. Long Mint is one of the few ladyboys I know of that has talked about her life and what it’s like. She even speaks fluent English.
There’s no reason for males to feel threatened by these little ladyboys looking like they’re packing 8-9 inches. It’s probably closer to 5-6 inches. These scenes are not as interesting as the newer scenes on their other sites. It’s very straightforward sex.
I checked the video quality of those newest updates. Those have 720p and 1080p. That’s the January and December updates. The updates before those two have an added 4K download option. I don’t believe I recognize these two newest updates. I like both of them. I believe I would remember. The one is with DeeDee, she is one of the ladyboys that is very capable of keeping an upward pointing erection during reverse cowgirl. She may be the best at it. She does have a very noticeable boob job. The other is Lee 3 who is one of the cuter ladyboys that surprising to me has no trouble getting and keeping an erection. She looks teeny, tiny in frame. Her legs are half the thickness of the male that’s with her. It’s her weight that makes her look so small. She is 5’5” according to site and 94 pounds.
I enjoy this site and have for years. It’s never changed much. It isn’t going to touch on many fetishes. It’s still a good place to see what you think of ladyboys. |
|
02-08-22 06:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Lara's Playground
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Her husband’s site JimSlip is included.
Most, but not all, of the content is older/younger lesbian
Nylons, pantyhose and feet focus.
Lately updates at three times a month.
Currently has 253 scenes. |
| Cons: |
No PU discount.
The site layout is a bit dated. It does not look like newer sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I share a few things in common with Lara Latex. We both love scenes with nylons and pantyhose. We also love showing feet and getting attention to our feet. I would call myself a reverse foot fetishist. Neither of us are barely legal or tiny. In fact she is my same height at 5’10”. She loves her girls and I love watching girls. She has many scenes with guys too and lately she mentions she has an escorting career. I love her enthusiasm and her pure enjoyment of her sexuality. I would say she is a great role model for women who enjoy sex and are assertive about it. She has pantyhose, garter belts, girdles, seamed stockings and high heels. Lara loves to use costumes in her scenes as well. Sometimes she plays a maid or a nurse. The one that gets me is her as a schoolgirl. That stretches my imagination as she is tall, about 40ish and rather large breasted. She loves shorter women and being the older female. In fact that is played up quite a bit and makes for many hot scenes. Most of her partner women are pros and are not as much fun to watch as she herself is. I was pleasantly surprised to see Destiny DeVille paired with Lara. She is Indian, born in Bombay (Mumbai) and there have never been many in porn. In repressed India porn is illegal and women have very few rights as well. I have not seen her in many years and I think she is retired.
In her heterosexual scenes with guys, they aren’t your usual porn guys, in fact mostly they look like fans of the site who got lucky.As an extra added value her husband has his own site, Jim Slip. His scenes are older/younger and for the most part entertaining.
I was able to find a discount for this site and it helps with an older site like this one.
Although much of the site is rather old, I would recommend this if you can find the discounted price. I think 87 is a fair rating. |
|
09-28-20 09:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
Le Wood
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Super site directed and operated by porn married couple Mark Wood and Francesca Lee
Though the range of niches is broad there isn't anything too shocking like if Mark was with a transsexual. There are transsexuals on the site, but I guess Mark is behind the camera.
Definitely seeing a progressive married couple at work. Both Mark and Francesca have sex scenes with other people and some threesomes together too.
There are 1,377 scenes, but that number is a little inflated by most scenes also having an accompanying behind the scenes video.
The update schedule is different than most sites. It looks like they do a monthly update for the first week of each month (5-7)
The scenes focus on around 50 DVD series they produce including Anal Newbies with 82 scenes. |
| Cons: |
There are some pretty rough and hardcore scenes on here. I was thinking it might be similar to Porn Fidelity. I don't mind most rough scenes, but a few of these were rougher than I like.
I would like a little more story in the scenes that feature both Mark and Francesca.
The mentioned Behind the Scenes videos that bump the video count up by at least 500. These are short 6-10 minute videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's no secret, I like porn that has some perversion to it. Telling me a husband and wife are filming porn together on their site and having sex with other people is perversion! Which is a problem this site has, but I wouldn't call it a con. Mark and Francesca seem to be such professionals they don't show any emotion other than lust when they see their spouse having sex with others. Mark does look to be the lucky guy. He stars in every Anal Newbies scene I have watched and thought the one with Harmony Wonder and Zoe Bloom were very good, but I am sure Francesca got some revenge after watching how much he was loving the anal with those two, little, young models.
I did bring up some of the scenes can be very rough. One of the newest is a good example. It is with Natalie Porkman, who is one of the skinniest, most innocent looking models I have seen. Mark and Francesca completely destroy her. I can see and understand the sex being rough, but there are parts where Francesca has both of Natalie's arms pulled straight back while Mark jabs her throat with his dick. There is a lot of spitting in the scene, on Natalie's face, in her mouth, that's just degrading to me.
I thought one of the best scenes was Mark with Nia Nacci in Anal Brat for White Cock. I think it's a good example of how rough, anal sex can be done without it being degrading. Both him and her seemed to love the scene. Makes you wonder if Francesca keeps a note on a notepad to go a little faster the next time she's with another guy! I think that would make an interesting series. Mark makes Francesca jealous, Francesca makes Mark jealous.
The site is big with those 1,377 scenes and while I did list the Behind the Scenes as a con, some of those are pretty interesting and aren't a complete waste. All 1,377 scenes can be downloaded (as long as you sign up for the download option $5 more for the first month) in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile resolutions. It's an interesting site that didn't quite live up to my expectations coming from the Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity sites also ran by a husband and wife. The roughness doesn't surprise me and I knew there would be some. I do think one of the funniest parts is Mark is in so many of the anal scenes. I can just imagine him saying to Francesca, "But this is a new series and I want it to be perfect!" There are a few other guys that get their chances in the anal scenes. Mark seems like a likeable guy so I would think that helps with him being that involved in the anal scenes. I would recommend it to those into hardcore, anal, even some roughness. |
|
09-08-20 11:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
Lesbian Sistas
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Darker-skinned lesbians that I believe include Latinas and possibly women from India.
While the site isn’t a large site with 78 videos, this is a niche I haven’t seen hardly anywhere. The action and quality make up for the smaller size.
All 78 scenes have a minimum of 1080p as the highest download option, 12 of the scenes have 4K.
Each scene has photo and screencap downloads.
The models are not only pretty, but I also don’t believe it’s that common to have a lesbian site with darker complexion models.
There is a thought most of these women really are lesbians or they are very good actresses. |
| Cons: |
There are no dates on the scenes and from what I’ve read the network no longer updates. These are still worth downloading.
There seems to be some technical problems with the site. The downloads for the picture zips comes up as potentially dangerous due to an unsecure connection. The videos take a while to load to stream too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like lesbian porn especially when it is of women that are possibly real lesbians and not just actresses. These women are very pretty, nice bodies and some of the positions they get themselves turned into makes me think they have experience in being with another woman.
Most of the scenes are long (30 minutes plus) and cover showing both models in multiple positions to get all their best features in. The scene that led me to this site is two models I know are pros: Jenna Fox and Kira Noir. They are in an office and have a Sybian up on the desk. This is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen. It is right at 40 minutes long and includes kissing, fingering, oral, anal play, sixty-nine, and they somehow still have the energy left to take turns riding the Sybian while the other touches and kisses them. It’s one of those scenes that can make a site. Which is the best part of the site, nearly all the scenes are at least close to as good as this one. I saw this one on a tube site and the link from it led me to join since it is one of the scenes with up to 4K.
I talk about this in another review from this network, they have little dots on the streaming scene’s timeline that tell you when the action changes. That one has Eating Pussy, Pussy Fingering, Sixty-Nine, Sybian easy to scan to spots in the scene. Those don’t show up on the downloaded version.
As much as I liked that scene, it ended up being only my 3rd or 4th favorite scene from the site. The one with Nicole Bexley and Priya Price is one of the “roughest” lesbian scenes I’ve seen and they are listed as a couple. That was my feeling when watching some of these scenes. There is a lot of chemistry and maybe even taking liberties, that I don’t know that a non-couple (in real life) would risk.
The other scene that made the membership worth the price features Sarah Banks and Jazzy Jamison. These are not names I recognize. The comfort-level between the women leads to most of my beliefs about a real relationship. There is pussy eating in this scene that I know real couples don’t even do. Deep licking, even nibbling with passionate kisses.
The site has 78 scenes, photos and screencaps with each and the downloads are unlimited according to the join page which invites new members to download their whole collection. I still don’t know enough about technology to understand the 60 frames per second tag, but most of the scenes on this site has it.
My favorite part of all the scenes on this site is the way they use foreplay in each of the scenes. A hand up the skirt rubbing over the panties is sexy to me. Especially when the rest of the clothes just start coming off naturally. It’s too bad the site isn’t updating anymore. This seems to be a underused niche in the lesbian genre. |
|
12-08-21 07:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
Lets Go Bi
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Bisexual men with a woman. It’s a niche that I like, but I do have believability problems with it.
Similar to believability problems with solo women sites.
There are 50 scenes. They update two times per month.
Video quality is very good, it goes up to 4K.
The site is easy to use and has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads.
Some of the female models are very attractive. That goes into the believability for me. |
| Cons: |
You’re pushing my reality button when you put two young, handsome guys with a woman who is barely attractive.
If the bisexual part was not included, how attractive the woman is wouldn’t matter as much.
Some of this doesn’t make sense to me. There are guys wearing strapons. I know about men using bigger dildos as covers over their dick to please the wife more, but that is just different to me.
They have a few scenes that bring voyeurism in for the woman. I think that helps, but it’s only a few scenes that do that. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really didn’t know how I felt about this site. I like bisexual men sites. I have mental blocks that I have to get through. I will explain that. There is a porn series where a very beautiful woman is being pursued by a man. He finally reaches her, and she has a boyfriend. She tells him, if you want to fuck me, you have to fuck him (her boyfriend). I have heard of that being more common than we realize. I have to use that as a way for me to believe the two guys are not gay, but they are willing to go bisexual to get the beautiful woman. Some of the women on this site are the least attractive of the three. Which makes me think it is two gay men that are willing to add an unattractive women for pay.
The site is not real big at 50 scenes. It is updating twice per month. I mentioned the voyeur possibility with a site like this one. One of the scenes has a pretty, young woman in a spa tub watching her boyfriend and another man give each other oral sex in the sauna. That is another way the bisexual men scenes work for me. I still do not understand the one with the guy wearing a strapon. To make that one more confusing, the really pretty woman also has a strapon. The one position that I like least in bisexual men porn is also one I don’t like in 2 transsexuals with a woman. That is one guy up the other guy’s butt while the other guy is in the woman’s pussy. That’s too much movement. It makes me motion sick trying to watch that.
This site has some scenes I do like. There is one where one of the guys looks very young and he is topping the other guy. He is looking at the nude woman like he has never seen a nude woman. That could be another way to make me believe these men pass up the beautiful woman to slide in a hairy ass. The settings of these scenes are very nice. There are rolling hills, outdoors scenes. There are hotel bathrooms and maybe that is used to add some spontaneity. I think that would usually be the case. It just happened, we got lost in the moment.
The scenes could be longer. This is one that really need subtitles. Some are speaking English, but it’s not the best English I have heard. Mine isn’t either. I know that subtitles would help a lot. This is the struggle I have with bisexual men porn. Most of the guys in the scenes give me the feeling they are gay men. That is me being complicated. Or complicating the scene. The site is good and if you don’t complicate like I do, it’s even better. I do believe I would like it more if the females were younger. The scenes with younger females on the site are my favorites. It’s another step in the right direction. There is room for improvement in the way the scenes are produced, casted and directed. |
|
01-12-22 08:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, cute and sexy lesbian action.
The site updates twice per month and currently has 502 scenes.
The models look to all be professionals or on their way to be professionals, there are 374 total.
Tagging system is useful, but could be more expansive.
Realistic action, but again, these are professional models. Will have a related con.
Video quality is excellent as are the photo sets. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are a little too professional. You just lose any real belief or even suspended disbelief in the sincerity of the action.
No English subtitles, many of the sites through this company have English subtitles, it takes me back to the too professional feeling, the main form of communication is moaning and there’s not much story. |
| Bottom Line: |
One thing I don’t think anyone can complain about are the looks of the models. Nearly all 374 of these models are very attractive. The action is where you could complain. There’s no doubt the models are giving each other oral sex and kissing, but there is some doubt in maybe 30% of the scenes if we’re just watching professionals going through the motions. I expected a little more with these models being young, but it could be a European difference too.
The story, to me, is very important in lesbian scenes. I want to know if (even if fictional) it’s one’s first time being with a woman or if maybe one has a boyfriend at home, but wants to try a woman. Just give me something to work with.
The technical quality on the site is impressive, but it is important to know something I noticed. The site did not update between 12-18-2015 and 5-4-2018. That’s a 2.5 year gap in updates and I look at that from the technical quality side of it. While they have been producing 1080p since 2010, the 5 years before that are lower quality and 1080p in 2010 isn’t as sharp as 1080p from 2018. That is a note to make to yourself if technical quality is very important to you. The newer videos also have 4K downloads.
The picture sets are quite large with around 125 photos in each and are not screen captures from the videos. These can be downloaded in zip files. Also important if you’re interested in the photos is the newer photo sets are massive in file size (for a photo set). One I downloaded was 1.7GB for the picture set zip. The resolution is 4480x6720. If you like seeing every single inch of the model you can with these pictures.
I just feel like the content could be a little more exciting or even playful. Lesbian scenes don’t seem to have a gray area. Some of the scenes are worth downloading and watching multiple times, while other scenes (even with gorgeous models) are dull and redundant. It didn’t surprise me when I found scenes with still attractive, but not as attractive as the most attractive models on the site -- those scenes were the best. There’s that feeling that some of these models are just there for their looks. It’s still a good site with superior technical quality, especially over the last 3 years. |
|
08-09-21 03:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
Love Her Feet
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pornusers discount of only $12.95 for a month
Top quality production values with 240 scenes and about six updates per month.
Easy search function
Every model has perfect feet and pedicures
Models are all well known Americans who are stunningly beautiful
Download quality as high as 4K |
| Cons: |
I would like more than 6 new updates per month or a bigger archive.
If you're not into foot fetishes you probably won't like this site as much as I do. |
| Bottom Line: |
The director is Andrew Youngman who has directed 1000’s of porn movies over the past 20 years. He is one of the few porn directors I follow the content of. His dream was to make the best porn foot fetish site in the world. He tries to get every camera angle as strategically chosen to make for the best scene possible. Every frame of every scene has the feet as the focus. The production values are beautiful as you see an attention to detail that is highly uncommon in porn.
There are models who wear pantyhose, stockings and heels and their legs look invitingly fantastic. In every scene there is a different premise. Sometimes it is family like stepsister and brother, in other scenes it may be older younger, or power differences like attorney and client or tutor and student. In every scene the man is so turned on by her feet that he literally cannot help but get carried away. There is plenty of toe sucking to be sure, but there are also plenty of footjobs where her feet massage his cock. In every scene the sex comes next and the heat from the foot foreplay builds to a climax. The action flows naturally as for example in a scene where he rubs his dick on her feet and then she is inspired to give him a footjob. He comes on her feet with a nice cumshot visual that I really like. In some scenes she licks his cum off her feet. It does not get any better than that. I saw an awe inspiring hot scene where a foot job lead to a blowjob. In another he is fucking her face and she offers him her feet to suck on. He goes back and forth. If I can imagine a foot scene, it probably is on this site.
Many of the tags are designed for a foot site. Where else do you see a tag for nail polish color or size of her feet? The site is very easy to use and the downloads were fast. You can even get the scenes in 4K. The models are well known Americans who have made many scenes before. I suspect that many have not done foot fetish videos though. The attractiveness of the models is a given and there is a nice level of racial variety too. I love foot fetish videos and I feel this Is my new favorite site. Even better is that the price is only $13 for a month. |
|
08-31-21 08:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Love Wetting
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The video download options include 4K
Many beautiful and major name Czech pornstars are on the site and are in multiple videos for each one.
There are bonus videos that you get access to for loyalty.
There is an update almost every day. Nearly 2200 videos are available, some in 4K.
Bills using Epoch and CCBill, two of the most reliable in the business. |
| Cons: |
For the most part, the videos run two minutes or less.
There is no sex of any kind at all. It is good that the site sticks to the theme, but what a waste not to use the pornstar lineup here. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that interests me as a woman from India. Back home there, it is not uncommon for Indian men to urinate in public. If a woman did that, it would be a much lewder act. This is so looked down upon that it would actually be considered acceptable that if a male witnessed that, there would be severe penalties. In my case this has resulted in my being turned on by the idea of such a taboo act.
The appeal is more a fetish than erotic. There is no sex at all in any of the videos and I see that as a missed opportunity. The models are mostly very pretty, Eastern European and I recognized many of them from other porn sites. There are a few men on the sites though. They sometimes spy on the women while they are peeing and in a few cases stalk them. Their role on the site is not important and you never get to see them pee either. I wanted to see the men doing more. Maybe they should have been asserting dominance when they caught a peeing woman? I was hoping for that as it would have seemed what was a logical consequence in my native culture.
In some videos labeled as wetting, you see the women peeing in their clothes. I understand sometimes we all have to go, but these videos did nothing for me. Sometimes the women are in what are labeled as pissing scenes and some videos have them letting it all out in scenes outdoors. The difference is that in the second category the premise is that of desperation. A woman is on a bus and has the urge so bad she gets off to relieve herself. For me these are the reason to join the site. The natural way they act is a contrast with so much of the sex we see in porn. Nothing about a scene like these is fake, forced, unnatural or even hard to relate to. It can be easy to identify with the models. They could easily be you or someone you know. Who can say that there have been times we have not been in a similar situation?
The scenes I enjoyed the most were kind of a parody of the natural urges. There were contests and prizes awarded for holding your pee and the stars won or lost. Their personalities came out quite clearly and there was the reminder that these young ladies were doing the site for money. They had fun and they laughed. So did I.
Understandably, the videos were very short, about two minutes. The site stayed on topic and that is all the time needed. However you get updates almost every day. I liked the site, but it could have been better. A nice surprise here and there and a bit more of the unpredictable would have been better. |
|
09-07-21 04:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
Massage Parlor
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A welcome change to the formulaic world of massage porn even if the site is dead.
There are 314 scenes each with a downloadable video.
Very little intercourse, but more than a handjob/blowjob. It’s a middle ground of what massage porn usually gives us.
Simple to use site.
Very good video quality, considering the site hasn’t updated in years, makes it an easy site to skip, but you shouldn’t.
Includes photo sets with 100+ pictures and those are downloadable.
Most male and female models are attractive. |
| Cons: |
I’m going to list the no longer updating as a con, but it’s a large site for what looks like a non-standard niche in the massage genre.
There could be more navigation options and tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
The most common massage sites appeal to me. I like the use of oils, the massaging, the hand movements and what I see as erotic foreplay. The problem I have found with most massage sites is that the massages are usually just lead-ins for a handjob/blowjob scene or a standard hardcore scene. I believe it’s one of the embedded into, ingrained if you will, failures of porn over the last 5-10 years. That’s why I appreciate this site and hate that it has stopped updating.
The scenes start off like any massage scene. The masseuse is almost always the female except in a few of the scenes. There are some scenes with more than a masseuse and a customer, working in the angle of “she’s training” to add a second female. The massage doesn’t jump from first touch leads to sex. Some of the scenes have nearly half of the scene focused on the massage. There’s an added playfulness in the scenes with more than one female. As the male customer -- lying face down -- is unaware of the two female masseuses touching each other and taking their clothes off. Where the site excels is only a few of the scenes turn into hardcore sex. Most of the scenes instead of the female masseuse giving the male a handjob or blowjob, shows the masseuse climbing on top of the man in a 69. That is not something I am used to seeing in massage scenes. It, to me, adds a touch of eroticism. If you have problems with fantasizing, I think these scenes help with that. They’re not having noisy sex which usually ruins massage scenes for me. Maybe the 69 is the great mystery solver to stop the overacting and excessive chatter from the models? Both the male and female have their mouths either full or their tongues active. I really like this content and would like to see more of this style of massage porn.
There are 315 scenes so all is not lost. Of those 315 scenes, each has a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. All 315 videos have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads, even the oldest ones.
With the site’s easy to use navigation, though I will complain that there needs to be better tagging, the site is still one of those that is easy to look over due to it not updating. The attractiveness and decent acting ability of the models make the scenes even more enjoyable. These scenes do work in a little story. It usually happens within the first few minutes of the scenes and has to do with the male customer calling someone, talking about how stressed out they are and how much the massage is needed. It’s not anything too deep, but it is enough. I definitely recommend it for those who want to see a massage scene that is more sexual than a handjob (usually CFNM when in massage), but doesn’t go all the way to hardcore. |
|
08-09-21 03:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
137
|
Mature Fucks Teen
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Smut Puppet network
Can download High Definition content, but not 4K
Uses tags to find what you like
Most cumshots on her face or in her mouth
Many very classy distinguished looking gentlemen |
| Cons: |
No longer updating and only 64 scenes
In some videos the age differences are not that much
The scene descriptions sound like poorly worded women’s erotic stories |
| Bottom Line: |
I like older men and younger women together and it is one of my favorite fantasies. When I was younger I started to see older men as more mature and less selfish versions of what men should be. For me a classy distinguished gentleman is very attractive. Older men appreciate younger women, sometimes they are even grateful to us for sex. In a way that makes me think men my own age are not as attractive. I have joined and also have reviewed other sites of this type.
This one is offered as part of a Smut Puppet membership. Of course that means you get a lot more than just this one site. So how does this site compare to older younger ones I have joined before? In all fairness it is not the best and it is not the worst either. Some of the men are close in age to the women and that kind of decreases the appeal to my imagination in my opinion. The site states the women are half his age. I can only say sometimes, or at least the difference is not worth getting all excited over. Of course there also are many of the older guys who are the age of those I want on a site of this type. Give me some graying facial hair or a balding man and a bit of a paunchy belly and the fantasy begins. The women are pretty, but as is so common on a site like this, they are mid twenties, where I would hope for barely legal teens with fresh faces. At that age most women are naïve sexually and a teacher can help so much to get them to blossom sexually. However, I do like watching them in action.
At least the cum shots are interestingly visually. Mostly they are facial or in her mouth, which for me is reasonably hot. I don’t like internals, and did not find any here. The sex itself includes oral, vaginal and that rarity in older/younger-anal. Nothing disrespectful, rough or over the top hardcore, just enough to show that the performers have some level of chemistry.
The video quality varies from High Definition to remastered Standard definition. The difference is noticeable, but the statistics and file sizes are not really helpful in figuring out which are which. The site is not hard to figure out so it is easy to use and downloads were fast enough. For me the fact that new videos are not being added and that there are only 64 are negatives. What you do get is enjoyable and worth joining of you like this type of porn. |
|
09-07-21 05:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Men On Edge
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s a site aimed at gay men, but I believe straight women can get as much enjoyment from it and can learn a few tricks.
Very unique and interesting theme that I am surprised isn’t tried more often with female models doing the edging to men.
Edging is the physical stimulation of a man’s dick until he is ready to cum, hence, men on edge.
Very attractive men if you are into masculine, hairy, well-hung and very erect.
327 scenes with new scenes being halted for Covid. Prior to Covid they were releasing 2-3 scenes per month. If that will continue in the future isn’t known.
I prefer long scenes and the scenes on this site are nearly an hour each. |
| Cons: |
They do some cosplay which could be off-putting to some. It’s usually themed based on a close holiday (zombie/monster at Halloween, Leprechaun at St. Patricks)
Some of the harder parts in the scenes can be hard to watch including poles/sticks up the butt. |
| Bottom Line: |
The act of edging is a highly underutilized niche in all porn. Including for females and males. It seems like torture for the person it’s being done to, but as long as the other person eventually lets them orgasm it is probably going to intensify the orgasm for them. I would like to find sites that have women edging men too.
The basic story of these scenes is one guy is going to torture the other guy in hard ways like the mentioned stick up the butt and in nicer ways like rubbing his dick or sucking it for him. It’s still torture since he will stop when the guy is nearing orgasm. You will see some ruined type orgasms where the dominant one stops, but the other still cums without any stimulation. Those kind of make me feel bad for the guy. I do enjoy the visuals of these scenes. You see men peaking with their dicks looking like they are ready to explode. You see pre-cum. You also will see a lot of throbbing. It’s very arousing even for a straight woman to watch.
There’s not a lot of sex in the scenes between the guys. It is mostly regulated to handjobs, blowjobs and they have “sucking machines” they use on each other. The name of it could be Men in Pain, but I do believe there is a site named that. Most of these guys look like they are ready to cry or die moments before they finally are allowed to cum.
This is achieved by having the man’s arms or even entire upper body tied up so he can’t reach down and bring himself to climax. I do believe this is a more shallow form of porn, but I also know I really like it and I think that’s all that really matters in the big picture.
They have 327 scenes with the last update being in April 2020. There is a note on the site that says they stopped filming when the pandemic started, so I am hoping they come back and start filming again. When the site first started in 2012 they were releasing a new scene everyday. That slowed to 2-3 updates per month. The videos’ top resolution is 720p and that goes back to 2012 too. These videos are not a typical 720p video. My monitor is set to 1080p and I watch these scenes in full screen. They are very clear on 1080p. I’m happy to make the exchange for hard drive space.
They have a few scene setups that are worth adding. It’s not unusual for the guy being tortured to start out in white and wet, tight boxer shorts. That’s a fetish of mine and those are my favorite scenes. It’s not often you see clothing fetishes on all-male sites, but they do work those in.
This is a “gay” site I am happy with and confident to recommend to straight women. I just wish I could find more content of women doing this underrated niche to men. |
|
09-28-20 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
Met Art X
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pretty solo site that does a lot right but isn’t without some subjective flaws.
I am not usually as into solo female porn as some, but this was offered in a promo, and I came away with a similar feeling I expected to have.
The site is large and has a new update each day. The sites on the Met-Art Network release photos separate from videos and number them. Not for sure how I feel about this practice.
There is some variety in models, but it’s not a lot. Most of these models are pretty, slim, white.
Videos are unlimited downloadable and there are downloadable photo zips. |
| Cons: |
Camerawork and music in scenes. The camerawork is a major one for me to be convinced of the models’ orgasm.
This site unlike the other on this network that I just reviewed, splits the photos and videos up as separate updates but updates them on back-to-back days. Their other site spreads those out.
Most of my complaints on this site are going to be from me believing the visuals of the woman’s pussy is crucial to seeing how it reacts to orgasm, the camerawork has problems there and some of the women also close their legs in what is supposed to be the orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find myself highly critical of solo masturbation sites. One of my regular practices is teaching women to orgasm without physical stimulation. This requires contractions and teasing of the vaginal vestibule or introitus. This, likely is not something porn wants to talk about since it explains the absurdity behind “size matters”. Think of all those 12 inch dick unemployed men walking around with nothing more than a visual stimulant.
These scenes are incredibly straightforward and do lack a lot of the creativity I would like to see in a solo female scene. Also, not all of the scenes include masturbation, which I thought was the point of this being Met Art X. A 22 minute scene of a woman dancing around nude does not constitute porn. It doesn’t even equal tease porn. It is more like watching a ballet or artistic performance.
Once into the masturbation scenes, some have soft music, which doesn’t bother me as much as others. I know some feel this blocks out the moans and noises from the female, but you can hear those and the music is very soft. I watched numerous scenes that did this: Camera explicitly focused on the pussy as the woman masturbates, then as she starts to writhe, twist and look like an orgasm is nearing, the camera moves to a view of her from the side. I know this is explicit and maybe shows how much I am interested in the female orgasm, but I usually can watch the vaginal vestibule and tell when a woman is having an orgasm. A lot of these more glam sites choose to remove the camera from seeing that. I believe it hurts the scenes a lot. Several scenes I was very much into just lost me with the camera choosing to show the side view of the woman during what was supposed to be an orgasm. There is a reason male cumshot compilation videos are popular. Seeing another person, either gender, orgasm, can and often will bring on orgasm for the person viewing. This site would score much higher if they fixed that one part with the camera changing during orgasm.
The site is large with 1,156 videos, 970 picture sets, only 345 models, but these do seem to be top-level models. I imagine they pull popular models from their other sites to this one. The update rate is very good and there are up to 4K downloads on the videos with 6 other options, also downloadable picture sets. For an overall good package. I made a comment over a year ago about not understanding why porn with tattooed models believed it had to be as violent and hardcore as possible. I will make a similar comment here. Why not show the explicit orgasm? If the model is okay with being videoed explicitly while masturbating, shouldn’t she be okay with showing her orgasm? I may even be being a little harsh with my score, but that camera movement during the orgasm ruins the scenes for me. |
|
01-12-22 05:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
MILF Thing
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A MILF site that I believe has unlimited potential – if they can keep it going.
There are currently 70 scenes and it’s a tale of three eras. I haven’t seen a site that needs to get a push behind it more than this one.
There was a new update last week, the previous update was last year, the newest 13 scenes all have 4K and show the unlimited potential.
Dirty, hardcore, kinky, and exactly what I expect from a real Milf aged woman faced with hard dicks.
While the overall quality is not great, it is better than expected with more than half of the scenes having at least 720p and 1080p, and 13 having 4K. There are also downloadable pictures and screenshots.
A site that other “Milf” sites should look to for reference on what is Milf aged pornstars. |
| Cons: |
A tale of three eras. This site has scenes from 2007 – 2021 and there’s only 70 scenes. If you can get past that, you’re in for a real treat.
The older scenes do only have 540p download option, but the scenes are encoded well and are watchable.
No idea when they’re going to update. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like the Milf niche of porn, and usually find myself torn on whether that should be generational or if it should be biologically accurate. Biologically accurate would say a Milf, in porn, could be as young as 18. I prefer the generational usage of it pertaining to women in their 30s, maybe 40s, who are more experienced and that’s what this site nails. I don’t know these models. Some may not be in their 30s or 40s, but their sexual actions say they are very experienced. That’s what I like in Milf porn.
The tale of three eras: It looks like this site started out well-before the popularity of Milf porn started. Of their 70 scenes, 57 were released in 2007 and 2008. I don’t know when Milf porn became popular, but I wasn’t watching much porn in 2007 or 2008 and only started noticing an overflow of Milf porn sites over the last 6-7 years. The good thing about those 2007-2008 scenes is 35 of those 57 have 720p and 1080p download options on the videos. You’re not getting a big drop in quality despite the 15 years of scenes. The newest 13 scenes have from mobile up to 720p, 1080p and 4K, which shows they have at least started to film some newer scenes.
My descriptions of what makes this site so good at what it does (Milf), won’t be appealing to all porn fans, but it will be to those who like Milf porn the way I do. There are some implants, there are some tattoos, there are some models that look like they got their makeup done at the local beauty school. There’s what I’m going to regrettably call a little bit of trashiness to the models. Please, keep in mind, I do not consider trashiness to be a bad thing. Especially in these type of scenes. The Milf is riding one guy and another guy walks in, she spreads her butt cheeks to give him a hole too. This is what regular, I’m going to say, American Milf porn fails at. This is hardcore, it’s a Milf cutting loose, giving a double blowjob, getting double penetrated and loving every minute of it.
You can say the newer scenes cause some disappointment. It looks like they are really excelling in this niche on those newer scenes, but you’re not going to get many new scenes unless they decide to start shooting more. Which I would start a petition for. I don’t like rough scenes – usually. But these give a different perception. These women perform like this is exactly what they want. They want two guys, one pulling her hair, one putting her in the wrestling type hold called the anal nelson. They do not wince, they don’t whimper, they have no problem at all taking any and everything these guys give them.
The newest scene alone is so good I would pay the price just for it. It has a woman I’ve never heard named Dominica Fonix (spelled Phoenix in another part of the site) and for 56 minutes, she wears two men out by herself. It looks like her sexual peak, peaked and it all came out in this one scene. There are other very good scenes on this site as well. How many times do you see a woman having a threesome with two men doing all this at the same time, she’s sucking one guy, rubbing his balls too, a dick in her pussy, while using her other hand to rub her clit? That’s a Milf! I do think I have to be realistic with the score just because at the current update rate there may not be another scene, but if you’re into Milfs that fit the Milf generational category, who are at their sexual peak and can take anything sexual thrown at them while looking pretty AND a little trashy/slutty, you owe it to yourself to check this site out. |
|
08-31-21 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Mofos Network
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very good network with not too soft and not too hard hardcore sex.
The scenarios are much better than on similar networks.
I'm not bi or lesbian, but they have some of the prettiest women in their scenes.
Has 14 different sites included each with a specific niche.
I thought I was getting a great deal at $9.95 and will list it as a pro since I don't download much.
If money is no object they have a lot of addons they offer good prices on. |
| Cons: |
There are no downloads included with the $9.95 price. I was interested in the content not so much for downloads, it's $14.95 more to add downloads.
It's such a nicely laid-out site, very user-friendly, but there are upgrades all along the top of the screen and each time you sign in they try to get you to upgrade. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network could be one of the best in porn. The scenes are fun, creative, and the models are a step above the quality of models I am used to seeing on sites like these.
But I know the charging more for downloads isn't going to be very popular for most people.
The amount of attempted upgrades isn't going to help either. Look at this list of sites you can upgrade to: True Amateurs, Brazzers, Twistys, FakeHub, Property Sex, Trans Angels, Digital Playground, Pornhub Premium, Babes, Hentai Pro, WhyNotBi, Reality Kings, Erito and Metro. If that's not distracting enough they have a channels section that has 13 channels on it. I don't know if I have to pay to use those or not.
It says pay $9.95 to access the Porn Portal which is all those sites listed above. I don't believe they are going to give me all those sites for $9.95. Maybe it's $9.95 per site?
Most of the reason I scored it only 88 is the confusion.
The content is very good. I would score it 90-95 in content. The site Share My BF is one of the best ones I've seen. The use of clothing, leggings being ripped off, shorts being slid over, is something most porn skips.
Other sites like Don't Break Me, Girls Gone Pink and I Know That Girl have a great, almost amateur feel to them. They have a good Public site called Public Pickup, too.
The sites you receive without any upgrades have a total of nearly 4,000 scenes and photosets. They are updating 1 scene per day.
The streaming player works well. I prefer not to pay for downloads just to include the download information in a review.
It's a site I will mark down to return to and plan on paying for downloads next time. It's not really a con, but the cancellation system could be easier. I had to send them an email. To send the email, I had to go through 4 screens of offers and "are you sure" screens. |
|
09-02-19 11:22pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
142
|
Mommy's Girl
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Interesting, story (cliched) driven lesbian younger/older porn
495 scenes with video, photo sets and depending on your membership, they can be downloaded.
This is one of those sites that makes me wonder about how bi-curious I am. The models, both younger and older ones, are all very attractive women.
If you have the download subscription you can download in 4K (newer scenes), 1080p, 720p, 540p and multiple mobile or smaller versions.
Comes with the whole Adult Time network, but easily stands on its own. I even believe sites like this one get lost on Adult Time.
Production makes these scenes better than they probably are. The stories are believable enough, the acting is good enough and the sex is believable.
Updates weekly. |
| Cons: |
Adult Time's navigation makes all of their sites difficult for me. There's too many filters and covered eyes, open eyes.
Where there are porn stars there will be overacting, and just generally poor acting, it is a problem in some of these scenes.
Had 7 days where my download speed was below 1 MB/s. I usually am in the 30 MB/s range. I believe that's the high cost of being such a big, popular network. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian porn either really works for me or I hate it. I admit there's no middle ground with me when it comes to lesbian porn. I think I have shown in the past that I have an interest in older/younger, it can be straight, bi, lesbian or gay. I believe it is because the older actors and actresses are more believable. You can see a genuine excitement in the older actor or actress when the perky, nude 20 year old, is presented to them on a platter. You also get more of a believable feeling, especially with older/younger lesbian porn, from the younger women not being near as experienced.
I have talked about my frustration with Adult Time before. My favorite porn site, the one that first sparked my interest in porn was Vivid's site. Adult Time has made Vivid nearly unusable for me. This site doesn't have that problem which is my more positive side towards Adult Time. You can find anything you're looking for on the site either by just scrolling through or if you know the model's name, entering it. Their search system works well for what I am going to call lesser-established sites like Mommy's Girl. You can even search from the main page for Mommy and the site pops up as one of the selections. Whereas, if you are on Vivid on Adult Time and enter a name of a DVD you are looking for you may get 3 of the scenes from it pop up, but not the full DVD itself. Meaning, you have to go hunt the scenes that aren't coming up in the search. I do think this site could improve the tagging system. They could do that by removing the obvious ones. It's a lesbian site. Why does it need a "lesbian" tag? Or a "pussy licking" tag? The site is cluttered enough as it is.
I only join Adult Time with the download option. One of the other Porn Users members was picking on me about buying a 4K monitor, but not downloading the 4K files. Which is why my 3rd con was listed. I had a week of very slow downloads on this site. There was no way I could download the 4K versions. They have 1080p, 720p and 480p, plus 540p and several smaller ones available. I have figured out the 1080p, 720p, 480p are the same aspect ratio. That's what I am looking for from sites.
The scenes each have a story and it's usually cliche, but I do think the combination of attractiveness of the models and their ability to do a decent job of acting, makes the site very good. I would say it's one of the better lesbian sites. Which is why I either really like lesbian porn or hate it. Convincing me these women really are turning lesbian and it's not just a porn scene is just wasting their time and mine too. Let it be two or four women just enjoying their 30 minutes of lust. Which this site does a good job on. Maybe the niche of mommy/stepmom causes them not to play to the "these are real lesbians" problems most lesbian sites have? There is a large amount of content with nearly 500 scenes, they have weekly updates and that's to me, bigger than a lot of standalone sites I have joined. I can see why Adult Time is better as a year subscription. I spent 3 weeks just on this site and the Girlsway network.
You should look into this site if you have an Adult Time subscription, it's a really impressive site with enjoyable and long scenes. |
|
06-08-21 10:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Moms Teach Sex
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun, cliched, stepfamily site with above average stories, believable or not -- is up to you to decide.
Gorgeous female models, the daughters, the moms, most of the guys are average looking.
Two updates per month, follows an episode count, season count, similar to a television show, but I don't see any connection from scene to scene.
1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p and 270p video options, photo sets and screen captures can be downloaded.
111 scenes currently, videos last 30 minutes plus and have acting so bad it's good.
At least most of the mother/daughter pairs look like they have enough age separation to be mother/daughters. |
| Cons: |
If bad acting bothers you this become a huge con. Nearly every scene has the moment where the daughter sees the guy's dick and her eyes bug out of her head or the mom walks in on the daughter doing something sexual with the guy and her eyes bug out of her head.
I wish they would update more often. I have a year membership to the network and it seems like they could at least get this site up to 1 new update per week. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems I've fallen into two traps in the porn internet industry. I either end up on a site that makes me pay extra for downloads or I end up on a site with stepfamily porn.
I think as someone not raised in the United States the taboo of stepfamily porn is much higher since I really didn't know any divorced families growing up in India.
This site is still small enough that you're not going to feel like there's too much content to see everything or download everything you want. At 111 scenes it's enough to keep you stocked up on stepfamily porn, but not too much to make you feel like you'll never even see the previews of all the content.
This one works well and the quality is very high with 5 different video resolutions available for downloads. The models on here are mostly young, slim and fit (to fit the daughter role) and the mothers are the hot MILF types. You kind of feel like the guy would be lucky to be with either the mom or daughter let alone both of them!
Because I have a year membership it's giving me a better chance to stream and decide which ones are worth downloading. The streaming player works very well. So far, I have downloaded about 50% of the scenes. As much as I like the bad acting, I grew up watching Bollywood movies, some of it is so over the top I can't even get passed how bad the acting is. My tip to sites with these stepfamily scenes is to not have the scenes where the mom "hears" sex going on and acts like she doesn't know what it is so she must go check.
This site would score higher if the scenes were a little longer (45 minutes or more), had more story and didn't follow a similar structure in each scene.
There are some scenes that become too formulaic feeling. Daughter in cowgirl, mom in missionary, daughter in doggystyle, mom in reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
It's still a very good site and part of the problem could just be the year membership. It's another good entry into the stepfamily porn niche with excellent quality making up for poor acting. |
|
01-06-20 09:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
144
|
My Doll Parts VIP
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly unusual and maybe unique site. Feet and nylons, but lesbian in its approach.
Comes with the 71 site Puba Network of mostly solo models.
There are 75 videos and photo sets
All the videos are in High Definition
The biller is Rocketpay |
| Cons: |
No dates on the scenes so it is hard to tell if the site is actively updating.
I did not mind that there are a lot of tattoos, but some people don’t like that. |
| Bottom Line: |
The name My Doll Parts refers to women’s feet and legs. This review is for the official site of pornstar Kayla Jane Danger. She is very tattooed and that may turn off some potential members, but not me. I found her very pretty and sexy too.
There is a focus on making the models glamorous by using fetish vintage nylons, pantyhose, sexy lingerie, high heels, stripping, tan lines and teasing. Sometimes there is an old retro type of focus and you feel you are on a high quality vintage site, but in High Definition. What is unusual, and maybe even unique, is that the focus is on women teasing and being sexy with other women. There is not a single male on the site. You see foot exhibition of course, but also toe licking and sucking, as well as foot licking and sucking. Feet are inserted in vaginas. Feet are treated as sex objects to be worshipped, maybe even more so than the usual female parts. You get the feeling this is a closet, forbidden, naughty fetish that you are allowed see and you did not know women did these things behind closed doors. I love that the pace is slow moving and lets the viewer linger on the objects of desire. The use of close-ups increases the eroticism too. The camerawork is nearly magical. There is some masturbation focusing on her feet, but this is mostly a lesbian site. Some more standard lesbian themes you see are pussy and anal licking, fingering, and toys. Sometimes the lesbian seems to focus on domination, but it is very light and not like in BDSM.
The models are Americans and there is some diversity. My favorite here was Marica Hase, who is so pretty she makes my mouth water. The search is very basic and not all that helpful. Mostly it is useful for the entire network and not so much for an individual site. I did not find a list of the models, but the site says there are over 20.
Downloads were fast and there are 75 videos. It is impossible to tell how often there are updates as the site does not give dates.
The biller is Rocketpay. Many people don’t like that they store your credit card information, but I find it convenient. You save steps as you don’t to manually input your card information. PU has a discount price of $19.95 a month. |
|
08-31-21 08:16am
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
My MILFz
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site that has a lot of potential.
Bills Using Epoch
Includes access to live cam shows and thousands of other streaming videos as a bonus.
Older women and younger men.
59 scenes currently.
Updates twice per month, could be more but it's better than none. |
| Cons: |
Pornusers does not have a discount
There are no downloads as the site is streaming only |
| Bottom Line: |
My Milfz hits on another interest of mine, which Is older and younger. In this site the tables are turned a bit towards the women being older than the guys. Being MILFs they are in my age range. Mostly the scenes use the themes of a stepmother or a horny housewife. I am neither and don’t expect to be. Still some story is better than the standard in and out sex found so often in ordinary porn. The scenes are hot enough for me, but there are just not enough of them. I can’t fault the site for lack of trying. Even during the pandemic, new videos are being added twice a month. The low number of videos and photosets,59, is because the site is fairly new and only started in 2019.
In contrast, I can fault the site for being streaming only. Yes I know this is a growing trend in porn, but after my subscription is over I would want to get off on some of the better videos again. There is no discount through Porn Users, however and the biller is Epoch. They are easy to work with and cancellation is simple.
If this site had no extras, I would say it needs more time to grow before it is ready to join. The extras are some of the best on any site I have ever signed up for. There is a cam site with many thousands of models that compare with those of the best and better known cam sites. They will strip to nude and put on a great sexy show faster too. Faster equals less tipping and less watching them waste time until they get more tips.
If you are like me, you will love the other streaming sites that are in the niche of older /younger. You get Family Screw, Grandparents X, Granddadz, and Grandmams. They are all a bit different from your average older/younger porn and are worth checking out. There are so many other streaming videos that you get that you have to find something that you will like. I mean seriously a lot as there are over 15,000. Some of those sites that are included as streaming only here can be joined with downloads, it's a nice feature and a good way to test out other older/younger sites before spending the money on them.
I would go with a score of 85 as you get so much value for your dollar. |
|
09-28-20 09:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
Mylked
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site on the Tug Pass network and in my opinion, the best site in the network.
Pretty models (most)
Scenes give full view of the nude female model while she pleasures a dick through a milking table.
Updates once per month (very important to the review).
65 scenes, all available to download in 1080p and unlimited downloads.
Photographs with each scene are downloadable and often show more than the videos do. Possibly because of different angles? |
| Cons: |
It’s a small site and only is updating once per month.
It’s a narrow niche, every scene is nearly exact in execution.
Some unattractive models including what they list as GILFs |
| Bottom Line: |
I was going to review the network Tug Pass as a whole, but believe this site is more important. This will cover both the network and this site Mylked. Mylked is clearly a newer site on the network. It only lists one update per month. The older sites say they are updating weekly (recycling). The sites you should look into if you are interested in joining this network are: Mylked and Shady Spa, those from the best I can tell, are the only ones definitely updating with new content. Mylked has at least some positives going for it. The female in the scene is laying under a table. She is fully nude, sometimes she is masturbating and most of these models are at worst, cute. Every scene is the same. The female model is laying under the table while a dick is sticking through a hole in the table. The female rubs the dick, she sucks it, she masturbates herself while doing it. It’s similar to a gloryhole scene except the model is laying down instead of on her knees.
The 65 scenes can all be downloaded in 1080p which is another sign this is a newer site on the network and possibly damages the view of several of the other sites on the network where 480p and 720p are the highest quality downloads. All scenes on all the sites in the network only have one download option. The scenes even on Mylked are very short with less than 10 minutes being common.
I felt this site earned a review with the attractiveness of the models compared to the other sites in the network. These may be pro models even. Jessica Marie, Freya Von Doom, Honey Hayes and Reina Ryder are the 4 newest models. I don’t recognize them or their names, but they are attractive (pretty or cute), they have nice bodies that they show off while pleasuring the dick sticking through the table.
In comparison to the other sites on the network, these models are much more attractive. I rarely go into attractiveness in reviews unless just saying pretty models. I feel like a lot of the models on this network would be turn offs for viewers. I can’t say I have experienced that on a network before, not on this scale.
The pictures on Mylked are also much better than on the other sites on this network. There are around 100 photos in each set and while it does look like they are screen captures, they show different angles than the video shows. I said this in a previous review of another site on this network, I don’t know if this is a negative or positive. It’s a site I joined to watch dicks being teased and pleasured. I ended up finding my favorite site of the network, Mylked, shows more of the female and I’m not a lesbian. There has to be a bigger picture at work here. The attractiveness of the models on Mylked make the scenes more enjoyable and there’s irony in that. This is the one site on their network the male can’t see the pretty woman pleasuring him. The other sites have the “average at best” female models right in the men’s view. This site, as much as I liked it -- possibly because of how much I disliked the overall network, is still repetitive and small. I do believe if you check out Mylked, I don’t know how much the preview shows of the models and also Shady Spa, if you think you would like either or both of those sites this network is worth joining for the discounted price. I believe if you don’t think Mylked and Shady Spa would interest you, the network as a whole won’t interest you. There are some good scenes on Club Tug, but they are 480p. I will end with while reviewing Mylked, I clicked “switch sites” and they have a different add-on showing up that you have to pay extra for, Mylked’s “switch sites” tab has “Gloryhole (unlock)” in it. When I was reviewing Shady Spa and Cum Blast City, the “switch sites” tab had “Tug Spy” or Spy Tug (unlock). If I were them, I would work on improving the content they have instead of possibly starting other new sites they don’t offer with their network. I mention this because their newest site, Edge Queens, was locked from me accessing it for nearly a week.
This network is a mess. Mylked is a good site as long as you accept every scene is going to be similar. I am giving it an 80 for the pretty models who do a good job of showing off their bodies while pleasuring the male. |
|
05-11-21 05:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Nanny Spy
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun, quasi-hidden cam (at beginning) porn.
All scenes have videos and photos to download
Many download options up to 4K
Porn Users has a discount, but I joined through the Porn Pros upgrade packed
40 excellent models |
| Cons: |
There are only 41 videos, but they are all exclusive
Only two updates since the Rabbits review last October.
Filenames make no sense. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nanny Spy is available by itself using a discount through Porn Users. I got an offer to sign up for the upgrade package from Porn Pros, when I joined there back in April.
Nanny Spy is one of those smaller but interesting sites with only 41 videos, so as a single standalone site I cannot recommend it. There is a photo set and a trailer for each. In spite of its small size, I found a lot to like about it.
The scenes appear to be shot in beautiful and expensive homes in the Los Angeles area. I lived there during my younger days, but did not live in homes like these. They have beautiful expensive furniture and such extras like outdoor and indoor jacuzzis. The families hire nannies and check up on them using spy cams.
The nannies are always up to doing something they should not be, like using the house for a cam show, getting caught watching porn or using the sex toys they discover and masturbating. The fun starts as the daddy, the man of the house, catches them and confronts them.
There is an age difference in the pairings. This could have been the focus, but for the most part it is not what you do see. There is concept of a power difference and its consequences. The nannies are willing to do “anything” once they are caught. The nannies seem to like paying a price for their misbehaving and very willingly enjoy the sex.
In the real life Los Angeles I knew, there was a lot more ethnic diversity than you see here. There is one Asian model and no Latinas. The models they have here are some of the best stars in the United States, both in looks and in how professionally they perform. There is nothing fake about them either. They do their scenes well. Riley Reid and Adriana Chechik are great here, but I expect that from them as they are two of the best in the business.
The effort that was put into the videos makes them work. The site though is not so well done. There are no scene descriptions, or tags and the file names are always the same. So you get for example mp4_1080 for every scene that you download in 1080p. If you want to know who or what is in the scene, you have to change all the file names. Another weakness is that the scenes do not show a date and only two have been added since the last Rabbit’s review in October, 2019. I suspect it has stopped updating.
I feel the site would have the potential to be in the 90’s if they had more updates. This is porn, so I am often disappointed when a good concept is left to remain undeveloped. |
|
08-12-20 12:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Next Door Male
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Possibly the biggest solo male site.
Most of the guys are masculine enough to appeal to straight women.
Over 500 solo videos on this site, the number could be higher, but I’m not watching every scene to see if another man slips in later in the scene.
Newer videos have up to 1080p – but no 4K.
Easy site to use and download from. Works with free download manager.
Photos that can be downloaded, but I don’t look at the photos. |
| Cons: |
Some of the guys just are not going to appeal to straight females. I’m only mentioning that because the title of the site, “Next Door Male” has nothing in it to show that it’s a gay model site.
The last update was 6/11/2019
Video quality matches the site’s inconsistency. This site has scenes covering a 15 year period. It doesn’t look like anything has been remastered. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the best site on the Next Door Studios network – if you are a straight woman. The whole theme is solo men. I’m going to say the majority of these men could be believable straight men. There is a whole “tough guy” or maybe it’s a military vibe with the guys. I’m not American so I’m basing that on stereotypes. There are a lot of tattooed guys. Short hair, muscular physiques, not a lot of really big dicks, so I guess they are really going for the “guy next door” look with their models.
The scenes show one of the weaknesses of solo men porn. They aren’t trying to tease the viewer, they aren’t talking much, they are just trying to cum as fast as possible.
I do like that the scenes are filmed in different houses/rooms, and it makes it look like these guys just showed up at home and decided to record themselves masturbating. One solo men site I was on had the men all using the same room and couch to masturbate on. It was like being a fly on the wall of a sperm clinic.
I listed over 500 solo scenes in the pros. The number is closer to 600, but as mentioned, I am not watching them all from start to finish to make sure there’s not another guy in some of the scenes.
The one part that is a concern is the video quality. This took awhile and might not be exact, but in 2012 they added 1080p. That is only about 1/3 the total videos. The other 2/3 were before 2012. Those either top out at 720p or 480p.
I think with this niche and seeing that it’s no longer updating, you have to take what you can get and not complain too much. I don’t think they can add much personality to the scenes since the created “masculinity” might not hold up as well. Besides tattoos, beards, there are UFC posters on the walls in some scenes and most of the guys are “hairy”. I have learned enough about gay porn trying to find solo men scenes that I know this more masculine look is a niche in gay porn.
The scenes give very little to talk about other than a man sits down or stands in front of a mirror and starts masturbating. It’s a very good site and network if that sounds like something you would like. |
|
05-18-20 10:25pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
149
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The Adult Time of gay porn is what I was told about this network. I think it’s owned by the same company that owns Adult Time.
It comes with 17 sites and they are currently offering a free month access to their new site NextDoorTaboo. I didn’t add it as I’m most interested in the solo scenes.
Some of the sites in the network are updating with 4K scenes, most have all the download options Adult Time has with 360p up to 1080p and all the resolutions between those.
Currently advertises 3,599 exclusive videos on the network and 1,513 models.
Has downloadable photo sets, they list them as total photos not total photo sets and have 215,509 photos currently.
Averages a new scene per day. |
| Cons: |
I would have been happier if it were 17 sites of solo men!
The oldest scenes which include a lot of the solo scenes are from 2005 and only have 480p download option
Better use of the tags. I also see this in straight porn too. Why list “masturbation” on a scene that eventually turns into sex? |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network based on a recommendation from another Porn User member. Overall, I am pleased with it. I recognized some of these guys from other gay sites I have joined. I am hoping gay sites will think about the other market they appeal to and that’s straight women who like to watch men masturbating.
They have 17 sites on the network and I’m going to review a few of those separately since they have more focus on solo men. Compared to the other gay sites or networks I have tried, this one really stands out and above the others. There are seven of the “Next Door” themed sites and seven “solo male” sites including one I am very familiar with – Cody Cummings. It also has one more site called “Stroke that Dick”.
This number surprises me since if it’s true this is by far the most solo men videos I have seen on one site. Using their search and filters it says there are 1,720 solo scenes. This is where I took some points off.
Using just their tags it shows 1,093 solo scenes. That’s still a lot more than I have seen anywhere, but it’s still an inconsistency I would rather not see happening. Even on the 1,093 solo scene results there it a second filter to filter within the results and there’s “Anal Sex (16)” listed. It just doesn’t seem like this should be that hard to say, “There’s one guy in this scene and he masturbates.”
One review I read of this network said the downloads cost extra, but they haven’t been extra for me. Even the 4K downloads come with the membership.
I did find their ads to be annoying too. When you sign in you get one of those upsell pages like a lot of straight porn sites have where it shows 9 or more sites you can add to your membership. In the member’s area, there are ads along the bottom of the screen too, but they’re not too annoying.
This is as close to a gay network that can appeal to straight women as I have found and it’s why I’m giving it the score of 94. See my individual reviews of some of the sites on the network to see which ones have the most solo or best solo scenes. |
|
05-18-20 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
150
|
No Way Am I Gay
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I found I have access to with a membership to Finishes the Job. It is a solo male masturbation site.
Despite being an old site this is not a common niche (solo men) and there are close to 50 videos of what I may regret saying -- masculine, straight men masturbating (even more rare, than just male solo masturbation)
The scenes are not long and the quality is not high. You can download all the scenes very quickly.
The quality of the videos isn’t very good in numbers (resolution), but I believe the bitrate for this resolution makes the videos good enough -- barely.
There are pictures, but no way to download them.
No frills navigation, 4 scenes per page, scroll, download, scroll, download.
Quite attractive men for a solo masturbation site. I believe some of these guys have gone on to bigger careers in porn. |
| Cons: |
Each guy’s scene lists his dick size and that’s me shaking my head no. Inflation is a real concern when it comes to money, but these numbers are no way right. One guy is listed as 8” long, 4” wide. He looks maybe average size. Maybe the 4” wide is full-girth? Which would be hard to believe for an 8” long dick. Since that wouldn’t be very round at all.
The pictures would be interesting to download and look at, but no downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had to talk myself into reviewing this site. I was not planning on it until I tested out the different options. Each scene has 12 or more “parts” to download. Those are listed as “midband” which tells how old the site is. It also has a 3 part “broadband” version. Continuing my scrolling there is a full version of the video in midband and broadband. That, to me, justifies a review and me downloading all the scenes.
The broadband version of the full scenes is 480p with 1600 bitrate which makes the videos okay in quality, similar to a tube site. The midband version is 336p. Solo men is the one genre of porn I don’t expect or even want a story. I also don’t want it to last for 20+ minutes. These scenes have no story and most are 10-12 minutes per scene making the file sizes -- when combined with the 480p resolution -- under 200 MB. The site worked very well. The scenes downloaded fast -- almost as fast as I could get the next one started. I know this review won’t interest most of the Porn User members, but do think that’s why a review of a site like this is important. It’s a throw-in site with the Finishes the Job Network which I enjoyed. That makes this site the icing on the cake. The biggest complaint I have with solo men sites is it’s usually easy to tell the scenes are made for gay men. That could be from the effeminate personality of the male that’s masturbating or the male model showing his butthole, playing with his butthole and that does detract for a straight female. These guys may be gay, but they do a very good job of making me believe they are straight men who are masculine. I can count the number of solo male sites that have masculine men on them on my two hands. It’s just not common. This site isn’t that big with 48 videos, but that’s 48 masculine solo men scenes I won’t find on most solo male sites.
The scenes are basic in setup. The guy sits down and masturbates. Scene over. In a lot of ways, I feel like that adds to the masculinity of the male models on the site. These guys act and look like they are just masturbating to finish. Which makes for a highly attractive visual for women that enjoys seeing a man masturbate. Hopefully, some studio will realize the potential in a site like this and give this type of porn another try. |
|
08-09-21 03:23pm
Replies (0)
|
|
