Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-There's a decently large selection of models, many of whom are industry standards such as Brandi Love.
-The video quality, lighting, and camerawork are all very high quality and what you'd expect for professional porn in the 2020s
-Since these are "girlfriends" for the night, there isn't any of that stupid forced stepparent/stepsibling crap that's become almost standard these days |
| Cons: |
-From what I've seen, there are no creampies, no "throatpies" (where she deepthroats it as the guy cums), very little swallowing, and the cum mostly goes on them/around their mouths/sprays in the general direction of their heads. It's shame because there are MANY girls on here who take creampies and swallow on other sites. It's hard to tell for certain because
-There is zero search functionality. The models aren't even sorted by first letter. No tags, no categories, nothing. I guess this is because the scenes are mostly just all the same.
-The guys are all over the hill and shoot those thin, watery loads. Very few studs shooting thick and white ones if that's what you want to see. |
| Bottom Line: |
The models are all attractive and the quality of the videos is very high. If the mechanical act of sex is all you're into, this site is definitely worth a look. However, if you're like me and it matters where the cum goes, this site might leave you a little disappointed |
|
11-09-24 04:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Amateur Creampies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Nothing but creampies |
| Cons: |
-No updates in 7 or 8 years
-No tags or search function
-Quality that was good 10 or 15 years ago really shows its age today |
| Bottom Line: |
I first discovered Amateur Creampies 20 years ago. Yes, this site has been around that long. Coming of age in the late 90's and early 00's creampies were super rare, and with exactly three exceptions the first ones I ever saw came from this very site. I've been following it ever since and I've watched it grow, and sadly decline in those years.
The site had two main performers. Rick, the original for many years, was given the ultimatum by his girlfriend to quit porn or she wouldn't marry him. This is why he quit and got his replacement Tony. This is something that's disturing to have to say, but both Rick and Tony seem like extraordinarily polite gentlemen. There is absolutely no insulting or degredation of the women that seems to permeate mainstream porn.
Most women on this site used it as a fun weekend. Many are recognizable from work before their appearance, and many went on to become recognizable.
Over 20 years, there was a ton of evolution in how scenes were shot. You saw the money shot go from shots involving mostly the guy's ass to more modern camerawork focusing on the woman's body. There also is a huge transformation from short, grainy clips in the late 90's to what would have been HD in the early 2010's.
Sadly there wasn't a ton of variety in the videos. Especially during Tony's time it was basically the same positions in the same order. I would have like a little more diversity. They were some blacks, latinas, and Asians but the overwhelming majority were white college girls.
There are/were several partner sites involved. Next Door Amateurs may have been different way back in the day, but I don't remember and they eventually came to have the exact same content. There was an ebony site that had a few pages of updates and didn't go anywhere. There were also some gangbang sites but they weren't good. Not at all. As far as I know all of these have been dead for a decade.
Yes this site is extraordinarily dated and has been dead for about 7 years, but it really deserves respect as the site that popularized the act of creampies in the first place. Maybe it's 20 years of nostalgia, but some of the videos from this site remain my all-time favorites. |
|
08-16-22 05:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
X-Art
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-16-22 05:07pm (Update History)
Reason: Added more opinions
|
| Pros: |
-Old content (2015 and before) is some of the best porn ever created |
| Cons: |
-Current crop of models are all Eastern European.
-No tags or advanced search/filter options
-Updates were starting to slow before the pandemic but really slowed down during 2020, with no new updates for almost one whole year as of August 2022 |
| Bottom Line: |
When it was founded, X-Art was hands-down one of the best porn sites on the internet. The couples were really into it, because oftentimes they were actual couples. The videos were well-produced and cinematic. In fact, they were so 'artistic' that they often wouldn't even show the man cumming inside the woman.
The current site is absolutely nothing like this. The videos are indistinguishable from mainstream, over-produced porn. The sex is mechanical and emotionless, and the creampies are often obviously fakes. The actual quality in performance, lighting, camerawork, etc., was way better *ten years ago* than the current videos being put out. This can only be explained by massive cuts in production budget and a lack of passion both behind and in front of the camera.
The site used to have a wide array of models to choose from. As of the last 7 or 8 years, however, they have been hiring mostly barely-legal Eastern Europeans with no tits. They're probably paid a fraction of what a US model would be paid and I bet STI testing regulations are way looser. For some reason they also have not been crediting models lately, which seems suspicious.
Even when this site was new, navigation has always been primitive, with a very rudimentary search function, no tags, and no filtering besides choosing solo, couples, or group sex.
They appear to have been deleting negative comments on videos, which is the lowest sign of desperation.
It's easy to blame the pandemic for the decline of this site but the quality has been decreasing since the middle of last decade, and the updates were decreasing in quantity long before anyone had heard of COVID.
It's sad to see a site that was so great and unique die such a slow death. |
|
08-16-22 01:10pm
Replies (3)
|
|
