Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
All Kinds Of Girls
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- AMATEUR Models (NO PORN STARS HERE), WITH AN EMPHASIS ON MATURE BBW'S
- Raunchy as hell, anal in virtually every scene.
- 100% exclusive
- Plenty of content.
- Pretty good video quality, especially for an amateur site.
- Good picture quality, (roughly 100 pics per set)excellent camera work.
- Wide variety of models in terms of ethnicity.
- very simple navigation (maybe too simple) |
| Cons: |
- AMATEUR Models(NO PORN STARS HERE) WITH AN EMPHASIS ON MATURE BBW'S
- Scenes are broken into three or more smaller clips about five minutes each.
- Most models have only one pic set (multiple videos)
- No zip sets
- Site lacks some personality (makes up for it in substance)
- No network access
- Could use a bit more foreplay, build up, and variety; we learn little about these gals.
- A few of the girls are too unattractive for even me to handle. |
| Bottom Line: |
To say that this site is not for everybody may be an understatement, there are are no porn stars or teens here. It's all about AMATEUR MATURE BBWS, and if you like these kinds of ladies this may be one of the best kept secrets on the internet. The girls here, while not the most attractive (in the conventional sense) are certainly sweet and enthusiastic. Most seem to be genuinely shy, and even somewhat surprised they were able to get onto a porn site. The content though is NO FRILLS HARDCORE, as few words are spoken (and not much oral is performed) before getting straight to the fucking. Anal seems to be damn near mandatory, and not much time is wasted before hitting the back door. Bottom line if you like these types of women this site is like hitting the proverbial nuke button a jerk session. For me, I am not always in the mood for this kind of porn, but when I am this site more than enough.
HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF IT'S KIND:
Some may not agree with the high score, but part of my reasoning is that there really isn't another site that does this kind of content better. Sure there plenty of Euro sites the have the same focus, but the quality is a mixed bag and lets face it, it's Euro porn (language barrier). Also while there are plenty of "normal" bbw sites, NONE are as raunchy as this. (DirtyDirector.com may be a notable exception but the content is not quite same OR as good.) |
|
03-04-08 03:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Bootylicious Mag
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great video quality, vids can be downloaded in full scenes or clips.
- Solid amount of Content, some 80 plus vids and hundreds of picture galleries.
- 100% Exclusive content
- Nice variation of solo and hardcore scenes with some anal mixed in.
- Very good pic quality, sets of about 60 pics each, zip files can be downloaded in 800X1600 and 1600X1200 sizes.
- Frequent updates.
- Easy browsing options which have improved since I first joined. |
| Cons: |
- Focus on ass alone is a bit obsessive
- The price, at 29.99, is a bit steep for a site offering no network access. There is at least one way around it however, I joined Legsex at 29.99 and got this site included for 16.99 a month (of course I know not everyone will be interested in Legsex).
- Although there are plenty of pics, it could offer more for a magazine affiliated site.
- Noticed a few dead link picture galleries, these were rare however.
- Plenty here, but still needs growth |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall this site is strong on the fundamentals of pic/vid quality and options. I've been a member of this site for a while now simply due to the fact that for this particular niche there really isn't any better out there. The price is quite high considering there is no network access here; so if you only OCCASIONALLY like to see ebony and Latino gals I would probably suggest other sites like the Bangbros Ballhoneys, or RoundandBrown from Reality Kings. However, the afformentioned sites really have nothing on Bootylicios Mag in terms of both quality, and even potential(as it's still a fairly new site); so if REALLY you need your fill of these ladies, this is the place.
That said, my only real gripe is that the obsessive focus on ass alone may limit the site somewhat. It's quite normal to see whole photo sets without even one full frontal shot of the girl photographed. The videos also follow a similar track, which can make them a bit one dimensional as well. Obviously the name of the site IS "Bootyliciousmag", but for those wanting to see ALL these gals have to offer this could be a turnoff. |
|
02-10-08 11:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Busty Direct
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The models themeselves are some of the hottest BBW's on the web (judge that for yourself)
- Pictures are of decent quality
- Interaction encouraged through email and webcams
- Decent (barely) number of pic sets and videos
- Updates come frequently enough |
| Cons: |
- Video quality is substandard, not horrible for an amateur network, but definetly below average.
- Pic sets need to be larger (only btwn 50-80pics) to make up for the lack of video quality.
- Only a few joint scenes between models on the network
- Not much hardcore
- Too expensive for what is offered |
| Bottom Line: |
If you haven't noticed, this is really a very loosely based network of BBW model sites. It includes access to DaphneStone44G, NaughtyGia, AprilJuggs,Isabelllane, SimoneFox, KeamaKim, CurvyKatlin, and another mixed BBW site called BustyDirect. As far as the models themselves they are some of the best on the web; I have no complaints, (they alone keep me from trashing this network outright). Also for the most part these girls don't have a ton of content that can be seen elsewhere.
That's the sad part, because the conglomerate of sites known as ThickNetwork needs do a better job in terms of quality overall. The resolution on the videos, while not the worst, could certainly be better (although the girls themselves provide pretty good content). The pic sets can also be frustrating, as for one they are not large enough to make up for the poor vids, and secondly the photographers don't seem to quite know what they're doing half the time(too many closeups, not enough full nudity, etc).
HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF IT'S KIND:
Not favorably, if you really like the models here (and I mean really like them) it may be worth it for a month. Otherwise, save your money and check out BigandBrutal(for solo action) BBWSuperstars, BBWHunter, XLGirls, or even AllKindsofGirls (if you really want to get nasty).
* On a side note, I was offered a loyalty discount for 9.99 when attempting to cancel. It is debatable whether or not it's worth it at this price, probably not. |
|
02-19-08 01:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Leg Sex
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Does a good job catering to ALL aspects of the
leg and foot fetish.
- Excellent video and picture quality for most of the content.
- Plenty of content overall
- Zip sets in large and small sizes
- Frequent updates.
- Wide variety of models
- Easy to use (and varied) navigation features.
- Distinctive personality touches throughout the site. |
| Cons: |
- No network access
- Older videos and pic sets lacking a bit in quality (definitely in the minority however).
- No site interaction (forums, fellow users)
- A few major inaccuracies in the "search" functions, forcing users to use alternative methods to get to certain content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall this site has to be considered one of the top two or three leg and foot fetish sites out there. The videos look great, and have that uniquely bright studio like quality that the Score Group is known for. Obviously the pics are also very good with this being a magazine related site. The content is varied nicely between solo and hardcore; with just the right amount of unpredictability and flair.
HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF ITS KIND:
Some might compare this site negatively to a site like HotLegsandFeet. Now I have to admit I have never been a member there (HotLegsandFeet), but I think that Legsex, while not better, should be looked at a bit differently. It really depends on what you're into. HotLegsandFeet focuses almost soley on young Euro models, with heavily airbrushed styled content. Legsex OTH has a much wider variety of models in terms of both age and ethnicity. And while Legsex's content does have high production values, it doesn't come off as being overly staged; they do an excellent job walking that fine line.
I won't bother to mention any other sites in this niche, as to me most of them are not "full service". Meaning they usually will cater to only ONE aspect of the fetish,(such as pantyhose/nylons or feet alone). |
|
02-19-08 10:03am
Replies (2)
|
|
