Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Point of View site that does the reverse cowgirl POV as good as anyone.
- Good blend of models from stars to ones I've never seen.
- 286 scenes according to my count (see cons and bottom line).
- 146 of the scenes have 1080p, 5 have up to 4K and some of the oldest scenes drop to 480p.
- Photos/screencaps with zip downloads are available.
- Good navigation features and accurate tags.
- Active webmaster that is both helpful and listens to his fans.
Cons:
- It's become clear that there is a certain level of recycle or lost content on the sites on this network.
- As much as I like POV, I do think it gets more repetitive than other hardcore filming styles.
- The oldest scenes here really should be remastered.
- No update schedule or dates on scenes.
Bottom Line:
Mr. POV is the old story of a guy with a camera. They do a better job of POV filming than the average POV site. There's very little bouncing of the camera. Another part they do well with POV that other POV sites fail at is they have the volume at a good, balanced level. A lot of POV sites are very loud due to the camera being in the guy's hand.
They excel most at the reverse cowgirl position, one of the most underrated positions in POV porn. I think this position comes closest to making you feel like you're there. It's a very flattering position for the model (in most cases) and if you've had much reverse cowgirl sex you know you really don't get this good of a view in person.
The models are mostly teen to late 20s. You'll find some stars here like Aaliyah Love and the long-forgotten Bree Olsen, I recognize Allie Addison as a newer model. I don't know that she is that new but she does have a scene here.
I'm not going to completely bomb the score on the review for what is either lost content or removing content and recycling it. Their webmaster is pretty up front about they're a small group. They sometimes don't have new content so they re-release an older favorite. I would like to see them remaster. As for the recycling, which is something I wouldn't say unless I knew it was happening and I felt like it could help others. Those of us that are collectors do look at the numbers to see how much new has been added since our last membership. I've been a member here at least 8 times (since 2015). The 2015 TBP review lists over 300+ scenes. Looking at the content currently there are 17 pages with 16 scenes per page, that's 272 scenes and the 18th page has 14 scenes on it for a total of 286, that's at least 14 less scenes than they had in 2015.
What saves the network and this site too is this is overall a underrepresented niche. Not really the POV but their style of filming, this is porn that is very safe to watch with a woman. It's how I found these sites. One of my exes was really into Manojob and the style of filming they do even on Mr. POV.
It's easy to recommend it to someone that's never been a member or someone that has been a member but didn't keep their downloads. The content they have is very good. If it was me, I would take those old scenes down and start remastering them and put the 720p and up scenes on it.
They're one of those sites/networks that will get some added points for ease of use, good tags, active webmaster, they're trying to make it work and I appreciate that about them.
I would be even happier with Mr POV if they started doing some pussy tease from reverse cowgirl. They do it some on Manojob. It's a good supporting site to the Finishes the Job network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Don't let the title of the site fool you. There is also sex here.
- As of 3/28/20 they have 322 scenes.
- Very high technical quality.
- Very attractive models, I don't know a lot of them but I'm guessing these aren't amateurs.
- Released a new scene on the 3/26/20 and were releasing a new scene each week (see bottom line).
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Very good PU discount
- Vendo is the biller
Cons:
- Should it be a con that the scenes aren't 100% oral? If you're looking for just oral based on the name you might be disappointed.
- Really strange happening when signing up (will explain in bottom line)
- Scenes could be a little longer, some are less than 20 minutes. None of these are major cons.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to start with the strange happening or else I'll forget it. I was signing up for my account and unchecked the pre-checked cross sale, hit submit and there was an error. When I went to sign up it generated a username and password for me. The username was too long for their system to process. How does that happen? I think it was 14 maximum characters and the username it generated for me was more than 14. I didn't see any way to change the username until it rejected the auto-generated one. Just something they might want to look into.
One more part to get out of the way, on their updates, they have a notice up that in coming weeks they are going to be posting compilations, releasing remastered old scenes, releasing scenes from other sites, because of the Coronavirus.
I like this site but I do wonder why part of the scenes end up being sex scenes. Some of the scenes have as much vaginal as oral. They do often switch between in the middle of vaginal back to oral. The site has added value for me since a lot of the vaginal goes into at least a certain level of tease. It adds an erotic feel to the scenes. The camerawork is a major plus here. They do a very good job of focusing on the model's face/mouth/eyes during the oral parts. I remember saying something similar about a blowjob only site. Blowjobs in porn are usually too fast and jackhammer-like. The ones here give you more of a feeling of the model really enjoying giving the blowjob.
There are 322 scenes. Of those 80 have up to 4K video downloads. The other 242 have up to 1080p. They also have 720p, 480p, 320p and even 810p WMV. The scenes also have downloadable photos in high or low resolution. They also offer a trailer for each scene. If they offer anymore they're going to need a longer dropdown box.
This is another site with very extensive tagging features. They even have more fun with their tags than other sites. Three "pussy" types are Plump Peach, Juicy Cherry and the classic Big Taco. They have 10 different tag categories just for the type of model and 7 different tag categories for the action depicted in the scene.
The models are mostly Czech/Russian but thanks to their nationality tag, I can see that they have models from 21 other countries too.
The scenes usually start with some teasing, then some oral (both ways), a little sex finds its way in and usually back to oral to finish. The star of this site is possibly the cameraman or woman. Though lacking much story there is rarely a wasted frame of video and in today's porn world that is a plus. No bouncing cameras, no focus on someone's butt cheek while the action is 6 inches away.
I did laugh about the age filter on models. The most common age is 21 (83) and somehow, they have 0 that are 22, then jump up to 30 that are 23.
You also have access to the Wet and Puffy Network which has four other sites on it. Be sure to join through the Wet and Puffy Network page here on PU, it's only $9.95. The value raises the score a few extra points too. This is very high quality porn at an excellent price.
It's just different enough in their style of filming and niches to keep it from being another mainstream cookie-cutter network. Their staff seems active like with the Coronavirus post which also shows complete transparency on their part to announce how things are going to have to change until we get through this Coronavirus mess. Gave them a point or two for that too.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If you're looking for real amateur Asian porn, or any real amateur porn this might be a site for you.
- Around 900 videos and 7,200 photo sets.
- I haven't seen any censored scenes.
- Small, but very candid and realistic photo sets that can be downloaded in zips, this is fairly rare for an amateur Asian site.
- Navigation does what it needs to do and little else.
- Mixture of solo, m/f, threesomes, lesbian.
- Newer videos are 1080p. Not for sure how rare that is for what looks to be a real amateur site.
- Very good download speeds (85%+ of my max) very important on Asian sites as some are very slow.
Cons:
- No model names (usually a sign of real amateurs).
- No update schedule or dates on the scenes.
- Older scenes are as low as 336p
Bottom Line:
As most of us know most "amateur" scenes in American and European porn feature a guy with a camera with women that often become porn stars. Those sites also usually have top of the line video cameras and the only thing that seems amateur is the camerawork and the model you've never seen before.
This site, My Cute Asian, feels as amateur as it gets. There are 6 minute scenes of a shy Asian woman masturbating in the hallway of an apartment complex. The site's size makes me think it's been around a long time and the oldest videos with an unheard of 336p resolution only make me believe it's as old as I'm thinking and as amateur as I'm thinking.
They don't have a set ethnicity from within the Asian race. There are Filipinas, Japanese, Chinese, Korean and several others represented. It looks almost like a user submitted site.
While it might not appeal to a lot, I think it does to some, zipped photo sets of amateur Asians are extremely rare. The photos range from clothed and teasing in public, to full nudity. I'm willing to admit I could be wrong on the amateur part of this site. Without names, I can't say I recognize any of these models. The one thing that does make me wonder about the production is a few of the models have "My Cute Asian" written on their bodies.
Even so, I believe it's mostly amateur. There's a large variance in looks of the models, some are well below average, others are well above average. Some look older (I would say up to 50. Others look not a day over 18.)
The big plus for me here are the public or semi-public scenes. It's certainly more taboo in Asian countries than European countries and even America.
The cons show the real weaknesses. If you see a model you like you're out of luck. With no names listed you're not likely going to find any other scenes of her. There's no update schedule or dates on the files. On the older scenes there's not even a screencap. It just has a short, descriptive link and you either click it to see what it is or download it and hope for the best.
Surprising to me, the download speeds go very high and since these are amateur videos, many are 10 minutes or less, so I can download them in 10-15 seconds. I have been on several sites from Asian countries that take forever to download a scene.
Don't hold me to this count as the later pages on the site have no screencaps and I'm just trying to add them up. By my count there are 5 videos horizontal, 10 vertical per page and there's 18 pages. That would be around 900 videos. The time of each ranges from 5 minutes to 30 minutes. The photos are also 5 horizontal and 10 vertical and there are 144 pages. That's in the 7,000 photo sets range. The sets have anywhere from 10 photos to 50 in each and all are downloadable.
It could all be organized better but because there's no model names there's really not a lot of ways to organize it. They do have categories but the only categories are nationalities. There's a lot more to like here than dislike.
I have reason to believe they are updating. They list their video count in the 600s and photos at 5600, those have both went up by about 30%.
They do have tags like "hairy", "Chinese" and quite a few others but there's no way to tell how accurate those are.
If this was a standalone site I would recommend it for amateur and Asian fans but it's not a standalone. This site full of mostly amateur content is hidden inside the Japan HDV network. I scored Japan HDV a 97 mostly just for its content. To see that they have other sites like this one makes me think I might have shorted Japan HDV with a 97. I've been a member for going on 5 months and just keep letting it recur.
I will mention that towards the last pages of this site's videos and pictures, I saw one or two models that had familiar names and seeing that 95% or more of the scenes don't tell the model's name maybe there are a few pros thrown in.
The videos are downloadable and the quality does vary which is also common on Asian sites. It's definitely worth a look especially with Japan HDV included and Teen Thais too. This seems like one of the best buys in porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very high quality network of mostly niche specific sites.
- Now includes 10 sites instead of the 7-8 usually advertised (see bottom line).
- One of the best, deepest, tag systems in the industry.
- Unlimited downloads of screencaps and videos.
- 1,176 mostly European models.
- Good download speeds.
- Much improved navigation from my last visit.
- Technical quality, especially on videos, could be unmatched or at worst is in the top 5%.
- Updates across the network every 5 days.
Cons:
- The last time I was here they had removed Give Me Pink, my favorite of the DEV 8 sites, it's back but it's not updating.
- Kind of like a book filled with pictures and no words. None of the sites feature anything close to a story which is the point of Gonzo but a lot of people don't know that.
Bottom Line:
Several years ago, I gave this network an average score by my standards. It probably wasn't fair of me but back then they just up and removed the Give Me Pink content in the middle of my subscription. You can look at the TBP review and see that Give Me Pink isn't listed as one of the sites in the "Network sites" but it is now included again as is Fist Flush which also isn't listed in the "Network sites" of the TBP review.
The interesting part is both Give Me Pink and Fist Flush are also included in the network Sapphix that comes with those two sites and Sapphic Erotica. This presents a new problem.
The three newest scenes on Give Me Pink included with Perfect Gonzo were released on 2/4/19, 3/31/17 and 3/13/17, making it nothing more than an archive site on Perfect Gonzo. On Sapphix, the three newest Give Me Pink scenes were released on 3/28/20, 3/23/20 and 3/13/20. Ugh.
I would guess Perfect Gonzo has some rights to the older Give Me Pink scenes and have those while Sapphix has the whole collection of Give Me Pink scenes including the newest scenes.
I won't take off as much as I did before since Perfect Gonzo at least has some of the older Give Me Pink scenes but make note if you're a Give Me Pink fan you'll need to also join Sapphix to get the newest updates since 2017.
One of the "negatives" with this network is some of these sites had long dead periods. Like MILF Thing, it had a gap between updates from 2008 to 2015 with 0 updates. That does cause a big difference in technical quality.
Having said that, it's also one their top pro. These guys have been shooting HD (720p in early 2007), (1080p in late 2007 and beyond) for longer than any site I know of. They started adding 4K in 2014. Even those old scenes are HD and worth downloading, especially for collectors.
Their extensive tagging system is one of the best in the industry though they do go a little too specific at times. To humor myself and you, you could search for a blonde, athletic model with an apple butt, teardrop boobs, light skin toned with a big clit, trimmed pubic hair, tattooed with green eyes, with a ponytail who's wearing a corset, having sex on the kitchen table with twerking that leads into anal gaping. That's some serious tagging options.
The download options since 2014 include 4K (12-20 GB each scene), 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. The newer photos/screencaps are downloadable in zips that are sometimes larger than 1GB each. Those photos are 5000 long end.
It's hard to argue against their technical excellence. The question becomes how important is Give Me Pink to you? To show the differences, I also have a Sapphix account and they have 405 Give Me Pink scenes while Perfect Gonzo only has 338. Being a lover of solo porn, Give Me Pink, is one of my favorite sites.
Something I found interesting, you all know Eve Angel was my favorite model from 2006-2013, her first Give Me Pink scene on Sapphix only has a 260p download (2004), the same scene on Perfect Gonzo has a 384p version.
In the perfect world we could just join both Sapphix and Perfect Gonzo which would add Sapphic Erotica to it all.
Overall, I think even without the newest 70 or so Give Me Pink scenes, Perfect Gonzo is a very good deal and network that excels at both quality and quantity ... unless you want a story with the scenes. They cover quite a few niches, most of the sex is hardcore, nearing rough, with 348 DP scenes, 1,096 anal scenes and we'll throw a more extreme one in with 583 scenes tagged as "throat fucking".
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that's about women having very visible, messy orgasms. Call it the opposite of a cumshot site.
- Smaller site than I realized with only 58 scenes but this is a relatively rare niche and they are updating once per week.
- Mostly top-level models that even I know of like Maya Bijou, Autumn Falls and Kali Roses.
- Very high technical quality on the videos.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Segpay for billing.
- Believable orgasms.
- Scenes average 35-45 minutes
- Unlimited downloads and streaming.
Cons:
- Tough con to talk about the size of the site. It's a newer site and those into this type of content would probably download all the scenes. Quantity vs Quality debate rages on.
- It could use a promo considering the size of the site.
- They have other sites that you can add on as a whole for $69 more. They also include each model's scenes from their other sites in the model list. It makes that $69 offer look more enticing. That's a con to me.
Bottom Line:
There's very few things I like better in sex or porn than seeing a woman's pleasure. Sites like this are not that common. You almost get the feeling the guys are competing to see how many times they can make the female they're paired with have an orgasm. It's a nice change of pace from scenes being focused on making the man cum.
Autumn Falls scene on here is the best scene I've seen her in. This site makes you wonder how many of the female models are holding back in other hardcore scenes on other sites. There is a relatively high percentage of both males and females that find their partner's pleasure more important than their pleasure. We don't see that much in porn.
Most of the action is pretty standard. Male/female, no threesomes or group sex or lesbian scenes. The only unique part about the content is the focus on the woman having orgasm(s). There's a certain level of tease in the scenes ... from the male. Not stripping or anything like that but pulling out as the woman starts to orgasm then penetrating and speeding up. Some of the orgasms the women have are those world-ending, mind-blowing, whole body shaking orgasms.
The technical side of the site stands out.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, the 720p option has two formats (mp4 and wmv) and 480p. That's on all 58 scenes.
The navigation could be better but since it's smaller site and all scenes are focused on the woman's orgasm it's not quite as important. There are no tags or search features. You just click scenes and they load up.
You do get some public content. Some of the scenes start with the model inserting a remote vibrator in herself and the male controlling it, could be by the pool, could be in a moving car.
You won't be shorted on orgasms. While Autumn Falls scene is my favorite of these, there are scenes with 7 orgasms, even 8 orgasms with other models. There are also squirting orgasms in some of the scenes. Notice my use of "some" that's because of the lack of tags. I would have to watch about 45 hours of these scenes to give exact numbers.
After joining, I realized adding the full package would have been a better option and deal but then again only a few of their other sites appeal to me. I've become a niche porn viewer. With the rare exceptions where there's a model I really like. I could watch Autumn Falls fall off a toilet and enjoy it.
I'm going above my average on the score since this niche is one I've always been interested in. It reminds me a little of the Japanese scenes where the men see how many times they can make the women orgasm. Add the very high quality of the videos and hopefully they'll keep adding new scenes every week. The pictures could be better quality, 1500 long end with zips and are the hybrid studio/screencap sets. This is where they film the model by herself to get 10 or so pictures/caps, usually fully clothed and going into tease, then the sets become screencaps from the video. Very good site for those into the niche, probably an average site to those not into the niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If I reviewed it based just on subjectivity, the score would be a 100.
- Going on 5 years of having a membership here at least 9 out of 12 months of each year.
- One of the simplest sites to use despite being a very large site.
- Solo, public nudity, public flashing, exhibitionism, extreme insertions, and many of the models are being recorded for the 1st time.
- Technical aspects of the site and content are close to the top of the industry.
- Update rate has increased though not entirely set in stone, pretty common to get a new update every 4-5 days instead of once per week and went through a few months of a new update every 3 days.
- Photo sets are some of the best in the industry.
- Highest video download options are 4K with 12000 bitrate.
- Probably the prettiest amateur models you'll find on any site.
- Downloads are fast (85% of max speed)
- Tag system is one of the best I've used.
- Sorting features for finding models is also useful (all will be explained in BL)
Cons:
- The 1 point I took off is because I know so many are against the split videos. I've been a member on it for so long that I've picked up on why the videos are split and now prefer it.
- Filenames are still 01, 02, 03. I just make a folder for each model and download them to that but if a model has more than one scene it's still possible to get them mixed up.
Bottom Line:
I had told several members that I thought FTV was going to get my first and only 100 rating but I took 1 objective point off for the split videos. I used to take 10 off for it.
I'll talk about that first. The scenes are split to change locations, to change outfits, to change whatever action the model is doing. For me, a lover of exhibitionism, there are models on here that I'm really not that interested in except for their exhibitionism parts. I'll call that the fetish is greater than the model rule. On those, being able to just download one 5-10 minute exhibitionism clip of the model is a lot better than downloading a 60 minute video that I'll only watch the first 5-10 minutes of.
I'm sure there are people that like the masturbation better and fast-forward the exhibitionism, they can just download the masturbation parts and don't have to download the full video.
I think that split video format reminds us too much of the old days when you would be watching a porn scene only to realize you hadn't downloaded the 2nd part and the 1st part stopped mid-sex. That's not what FTV is doing with the split scenes.
The tagging system is one of my favorite parts of FTV. Each scene has a row of icons on it. These icons tell you what happens in the scene, "1st time on camera", "public nudity" and it's the easiest to use tagging system. See above, I like the exhibitionism, I can find those scenes with one click.
You then have the models. FTV Girls is close to 1,500 models and to me they're all attractive, maybe not all are my types but all are attractive. You will see some pros and most of those filmed for FTV before they were pros, not all. I always thought one of the best examples was Eva Angelina who was very early in her porn career and while she isn't shy on FTV she's nothing like she became in hardcore porn.
There are many models on here that you'll wish had more content on other sites too. It's one of the few sites that makes you think, "How could she stop at these 4 photo sets and 100 minutes of video?"
The exhibitionism, while maybe toned down a little, is still very much a part of the site and the 18-19 years of archives. They have changed their public nudity tag to say, "Risky flashing and getting naked in public places". Which means even the scenes not tagged that way still often have some light flashing. That's the big selling point for me. I would join just for those parts.
When you search the potentially overwhelming model list you can filter by date of release, alphabetical, age, height and bra size. You, of course, can use the tags too. It's one of the most complete and easy to use (once you get the hang of it) navigation systems I've used.
The technical quality continues their excellence. The newer photo sets have a 5000 long end option that you can download. You can also download a smaller resolution as well. The current videos have 480p, 1080p and 4K with above average bitrates to match the resolutions. Even the 480p has a 3000+ bitrate.
They have something I think a lot of sites should add and that's a sneak peek section to show you the next couple of updates so you know what's coming up. It also shows the more frequent update schedule I mentioned earlier. They had a new set on 3/17/20, have another coming on 3/21/20 and another on 3/27/20. They're upped their game there. I was happy with one per week.
These updates are worth mentioning as well as they're not one video and one photo set. These updates come with 250-500 photos (spread across 4-5 sets/different outfits and locations) and 70-100 minutes of video. They could, if they wanted, release one photo set a day and one section of the video and I would guess say they have an update everyday.
They have a bonus section that has several hundred outtakes, public flashing, models masturbating in the car on the ride to the setting for the shoot and these are all FTV models so you can get some extra content of your favorite models. Some are photos, some are 3-5 minute videos and it's worth looking into these since I've found some very good videos that I don't know why they're not mixed in with the regular shoot.
The total amount of content is nearing 10,000 photo sets/videos and here's a few breakdowns by tags:
Nearly 1,000 of the models have some content listed as Public Nudity.
Nearly 900 of the models are listed as 1st time filmed.
Those two alone are enough for me to stick around as long as I have. The photo sets, besides the technical numbers, feature the models in normal, everyday clothes, especially if you've ever been to the west coast of the United States. When I started getting bored with glam models, I started joining FTV more (around 2013) and to me the models are very natural looking and acting for American models. There's also some ethnic diversity. I keep trying to find something to complain about but it's not working. I personally think it's the best all-around porn site on the internet.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very large, (mostly) amateur network.
- 21 sites with only a couple having pro models.
- Very genuine, amateur feel to the models, it can range from uncomfortable to nervous to excited reactions from the models.
- No real specific look to the models, there are girl next door types, tattooed and pierced models, small, slender, heavier, chunky, tall, which I think helps the genuine amateur feel.
- Newer videos have 4K option, 1080p and 480p.
- Excellent photo sets that can be downloaded.
- Very good TBP/PU discount price.
- Offers one of the broadest ranges of models based on ethnicity/race.
- Segpay is the biller
Cons:
- Outdated site design but it works very well.
- The part I think you have to accept with any amateur site, there's going to be some models you're not attracted to.
- Pre-checked cross sale on sign-up
Bottom Line:
Chickpass has grown over many years into one of the premier amateur sites. The site design could turn some off but like the old saying don't judge a book by its cover.
You get different sites with this network that almost work more like genres or niches. One is College Amateurs, one is T&A Asians, another is T&A Latinas and I think you get my drift. Or you can just go to the Chickpass Adult Network which works as a hub page. The size of the network is impressive. There are over 2,000 models. Over 7,000 videos and around 3,500 photo sets.
That's a lot of mostly amateur content. It's one of the good uses of the different sites. One is Chickpass Pornstars, so if you don't like pornstars, you can just avoid going to it.
The scenes vary from solo masturbation/tease to hardcore boy/girl with some lesbian content including a site dedicated to lesbian content. There are some threesomes as well.
One of my favorite parts is it seems like they just let the models control their outfits, so you'll have some cosplay, some women in tights/leggings, because it's amateur you're going to see tattoos, some bushes, some shaven. It's one of those sites where there is something for everyone.
I do think it could be overwhelming for some since this is a lot of content of models a lot of us haven't seen before.
The navigation is a major plus. First, you have the different "sites" which also works for specifying what you're looking for (Asians, Lesbians, Latinas, etc...), second it has a well-organized model list and third, it has a hub page to bring it all together. There are also tags including resolution, so if you just want 4K scenes, you can click the tag for it. The tags are accurate as far as I can tell.
Maybe the outdated style of the site wouldn't lead you to believe it has nice, newer style of navigation features but it does and they work well.
Using the tags it says they have around 400 scenes in 4K and over 5,000 scenes with at least 1080p, again very impressive numbers for an amateur site.
Of course, a big selling point for me is the various races of the models. That might be my favorite part of porn sites these days. If I could throw a minor complaint in it would be that I would like to see bigger pictures. They don't have to be 6000 long end but the ones I'm downloading are only 1600 long end. Maybe at least up in the 2500 - 3000 long end range?
You'll be surprised with how many major stars you find here before they were even porn stars. That adds a collectible side to the site for us collectors that like to have photos/videos from various points in a model's career.
They don't do much wrong and cover a lot of niches/fetishes.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No network has improved more and hits on more niches and fetishes than Pure CFNM.
- 6 site included with subscription.
- CCBill is the biller, haven't seen them in awhile.
- 1,409 scenes as of 3/17/2020.
- Averages 5-6 updates per week across the network.
- Has a feature all networks should have. Will explain in BL.
- Categories are accurate.
- A current total of 680 models.
Cons:
- Some of the degradation goes too far. I hold the same feeling with males towards females and females towards males. Some scenes include the women spitting in the man's face.
- Some of the more specialized sites like Lady Voyeurs could use a little more action or interaction from the ladies.
Bottom Line:
Just about hit the 100 button. Then she spit in his face. I've been a fan of CFNM for close to 10 years. The Pure CFNM network died off for a little while several years ago then came back with a vengeance.
These are the sites with a brief explanation: Pure CFNM the flagship site, this is a mixture of niches within the CFNM niche and has what I would call their most accessible scenes.
Lady Voyeurs is women watching men masturbate. This is the one with a lot more potential than I think they realize. The women have to become more involved, some do.
Amateur CFNM is what it says, these tend to have more sex in them and they're all worth a look and download.
CFNM Games was a short-lived site with only 24 scenes. These are okay.
Girls Use Guys is a major hit or miss site. Some of the scenes are some of the best on the network, others are trying too hard to be degrading to the man.
Hey Little Dick is degradation, some of it's a little funny at times. I don't see it as bad as the spitting ones.
The basis of CFNM is Clothed Female Nude Male. It doesn't always work out that way. I would say more times than not it ends up being as much female nudity as male. I've explained my interest in it. I'm a big guy, every woman I've ever been with becomes submissive and I like seeing women being aggressive since it's not something I experience much in life. And when I do, I usually end up laughing.
The quality here is very good. The options for downloading are basic with 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download pictures. There aren't any 4K scenes that I've seen.
The feature I mentioned in the pros is when you're in the hub page each scene has a little icon that tells you which site it's from. It seems like that should be standard for networks these days but this is one of the only ones I've seen it on.
I do think Lady Voyeurs has the most untapped potential. It shows in their scenes when the woman gets more involved instead of just sitting and watching the guy masturbate. You get a lot of fetishes here. The women are usually at least a little clothed by the end of the scene so you get the cum on clothes fetish, you get the handjob that turns into a blowjob that turns into sex. I think you could say there's exhibitionism and voyeurism as well.
The female models are not as well known to me as others. The majority are at least average or above average in looks.
I really don't think they have much room to improve. The degradation scenes seem to be toned down now.
There's also no ads or upsell offers. It's very close to being the best site for me. My fiancee enjoys it so that's a major plus. Would recommend it to anyone that's looking for something that goes against the grain.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For me, the best handjob site on the internet (Manojob) with two other so-so sites.
- Good navigation, seamlessly move between the sites.
- Decent blend of models, most are younger and white but there is enough diversity not to count it against them.
- Active and helpful webmaster, didn't have any problems this time but have in the past. Responds fast and is courteous.
- Manojob wins me over with this network especially with the "pussy tease" scenes. That's one of my more recent fetishes and they do it well.
- Rocketgate as the biller is back in pros for now. They made me email to cancel recently but the most recent cancel was automated so maybe it was just a glitch.
Cons:
- It's a tough con to hit them with but there is recycling and I understand why. I will explain in BL.
- Mr POV and The Dick Suckers haven't interested me. Take that more as a compliment towards Manojob.
- Updates are no longer dated, three of the four first listed scenes on Manojob are scenes I already have.
Bottom Line:
My apologies to MarcDC. I had already planned on reviewing this network as it has one of my favorite sites in it, Manojob. I normally wouldn't post a review of the same site as someone else on the same day but I don't think our reviews are that far apart either.
Manojob was the first handjob site I remember joining. Before that I would go to Videobox or some other DVD site and download their handjob DVDs. At first, Manojob didn't do a lot to separate itself from the DVDs but over time they started working the pussy tease in, some call it the cameltoe slide.
Mr. POV is an okay site. Anything in gonzo style these days starts to become repetitive to me. The Dick Suckers same problem. They're average sites if that makes it fair.
In the cons I mentioned that there is recycling. I understand that these guys are a small team. They have times where they're filming and can't knock out brand new updates every other day or even every week so they rotate and older, popular scene in as a new update. I'm not going to take off points for it. I'm familiar enough with this site, their webmaster, that I know he busts his ass trying to get quality content up.
The problem for me is scenes get removed to use as new updates. Rear Admiral reviewed the site in 2015 with 1,400+ scenes, TBP reviewed it in 2017 with 1,307 scenes, I reviewed it in 2017 and there was only 1,266 scenes. I made note that the month I reviewed it in had 31 updates in 30 days. This is one of those situations where the webmaster is a nice enough guy if he would just put everything back up and say he could only get 2-4 updates a month, I think it would look better. We know he's not a major production studio and we appreciate the hard work to keep up.
Still not taking points off for it but as of today, 3/17/2020, there are 1,273 scenes. That's 6 more scenes than when I reviewed it 2.5 years ago.
Manojob is still the best handjob site, tease site, in porn.
The scenes are not as basic as they used to be. They've incorporated JOE or JOI, Jerk Off Encouragement and Jerk Off Instruction. The women don't just kneel down and jerk the guy off like old handjob sites did. They now get naked, half-naked, and grind their bodies against the guy's dick. You'll even get a few slipped in penetrations. Those parts are what puts them ahead of everyone else. I'm not even for sure it's that close.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, 1080p, they also have the cumshot only video, a SD version, a mobile version and interview with each model.
I'm going to tell you the scene to watch to see the eroticism handjob porn can have, Teanna Trump, Class of 2014. They should have paid her 10x what they did and I don't know what they paid her.
The downside as I said the last time I reviewed the whole network is I don't see the other two sites coming close to that type of eroticism. They're doing something very rare with the Manojob content. It makes the other two sites feel very plain.
I'm raising my score quite a bit from the last time I reviewed the whole network. That's because the network as a whole frustrated me the previous time I reviewed it. I was frustrated with the disappearing videos. I'm going as high as I can go for the network just because I don't know how much new content they are putting out. They have around 10 4K scenes according to their tag search. If they keep up the Manojob updates and keep working on that erotic part, maybe I would go a little higher.
It would be my first choice recommendation to someone into tease and handjobs just because of Manojobs. Some people would add more for the other two sites. I have never downloaded anything from either. I have watched a few scenes to see if I thought it was worth a download.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interracial standalone Team Skeet site.
- Only 124 scenes and the update schedule is inconsistent but the scenes are good.
- Much like other Team Skeet standalone, the scenes are long averaging over 40 minutes.
- Decent but stereotypical storylines.
- Very pretty female models.
- I feel like a broken record, 480, 540, 720 and 1080p video downloads.
- Pictures and screencaps and both can be downloaded.
- Epoch is still the biller on this one.
Cons:
- Poor updating schedule, in late 2018 they were updating 3 times a month, then it dropped to once per month, now you might not get any updates (see bottom line).
- The humor is there but the stereotypical storylines kind of ruins it.
- Ads and upsells
Bottom Line:
This one might push my ability to get enough of a bottom line. The Team Skeet standalone sites have really set a high standard. This one while good, doesn't feel like they're in their comfort zone. The majority of the storylines are somewhere along the lines of black male athlete, usually 6'4" or taller, ends up in tiny white woman's house. This makes this site or hit or miss and that's unusual for these Team Skeet standalone sites. Some of the scenes are really good. Other ones you'll be lucky to make it to the sex part.
The technical numbers are good with 480p to 1080p videos, photos and screencaps. There are 144 models on the site and based on the Team Skeet rankings, I don't think I'm the only one that believes this isn't one of their better sites. It only ranks #31. Which is the lowest of their standalone sites with at least 100 scenes.
It's not a complete loss. I found 23 scenes I liked enough to download and plan to keep.
Maybe one of the hardest parts to understand is the lack of updates. They were updating 3 times a month heading into 2019. Since January 2019 to March 2020, they have had 11 scenes. It gets worse. Seven of those months had 0 updates. They've had one in January 2020 and one in February 2020 but none so far in March. Maybe it's because it's not doing well for them?
A 79 is a pretty low score from me so be aware of that if you're thinking that's not too bad. My average score is 86. There is the positive of Epoch instead of Rocketgate which some of the Team Skeet standalone sites have switched to. The easier to cancel it with. I think this site is about ready to be sent to the Team Skeet network.
I would recommend it if there are models on it that you're into but there are better interracial sites (Dogfart, Blacked, Blacked Raw).
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best kept secret in porn. Sorry, Cherry Pimps.
- I'm going to put this as a pro as it's not their problem, they have live cam shows that are very good but are currently suspended because of the Coronavirus.
- One of the most impressive networks in terms of technical quality (see bottom line).
- Nearly 1,400 models
- They average an update per day
- 4 Live channels/shows that they keep an archive of.
- Some hidden gems in here like the reason I found Cherry Pimps a few years ago, Aaliyah Love's solo site is in here. She has over 300 scenes here.
- They have the Cherry of the Month where they pick one model and they release new videos and photos of her throughout the month.
- Very good download speeds (80-85% of max)
Cons:
- It could be better laid out. (see bottom line)
- The tags could be better. They have some tags that have 2-3 scenes and there's tags they're missing. It's not a big deal but you have to nitpick these guys. It's one of the best networks on the internet.
- Maybe could use a boost in creativity. Scenes can become repetitive here.
Bottom Line:
The very first time I joined this network, I didn't even know it was a network. I joined Aaliyah Love's solo site. I noticed there were some other sites but I was focused on Aaliyah's site. Then, I joined Cherry Pimps and there was Aaliyah Love's solo site. Their history isn't real clear to me. At one time, I think they had 4 or 5 solo sites and still might. It doesn't show itself as a network anymore. It's one big site with everything mixed in.
You have to be ready to prowl around and see what you can find.
The Cherry of the Month is a big selling point to me since I was a huge fan of Twisty's Treat of the Month. It works very similar to that and last month, Vina Sky was the Cherry of the Month.
The technical quality is different here than a lot of sites. I think they might be the only one that does this. The newer videos have:
4K
1080p @ 20mbps
1080p @ 15mbps
1080p @ 10mbps
720p
480p
They give you three bitrate options on the 1080p videos and all of these options come with your membership. No extra charges.
They have full photo sets, screencaps, plus the live shows. I know that Rear Admiral wondered how he could have missed this site. It's really not been around that long. A lot of that older content was from the old network that Aaliyah Love's site was on. TBP has Cherry Pimps first listed in 2012.
The content might be the weakest part. It's gonzo type porn. Very little stories or anything to draw you in. It reminds me a lot of the old Twistys site. You went for the models and that's exactly how it feels here. If you're an Aaliyah fan they have over 300 scenes of her. For those that like dirty talk, you don't know what you're missing if you've not watched her solo porn.
It then becomes a treasure hunt as you dig through the pages and pages of models. They have some models here that I'm not used to seeing much of like Lylith LaVey, she normally wouldn't catch my eye but she did and she became one of my favorites on here.
The Cherry of the Month is one of the best features a site can do. Ever once in awhile they'll get one I don't really like but most of the time it's either a model I like or I start liking.
There's a little of everything here as well. They have over 3,000 solo scenes. You're not going to get through this site in a month. I'm currently on my 6th month and I still haven't found everything.
It could be recommended to almost anyone that's into porn. My score isn't probably as high as it should be. The site has changed on me. This is not the same site it was in 2017. It's probably losing a few points because I can't find what I'm looking for.
They do promote the pimp.xxx network and it was cross-sale when I joined. I don't know if maybe some of the content I'm looking for went to that network. If you join it plan on staying awhile.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those niches I wish had more representation in porn.
- Very pretty models, they seem to be selective in the models.
- Updates have slowed over the last few months but they still have at least one new scene per week.
- Most models have multiple scenes, sets and outfits.
- Three download options on videos, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
- Downloadable photo sets, very high, professional quality.
- Various ages, doesn't seem to stick to any age group.
Cons:
- The last time I reviewed this site I gave a tip in it and they didn't listen. This is supposed to be women in a fitting room. There should be some noise or chatter. I was hoping they had fixed that but they haven't.
- Very little diversity in the models except for age. Nearly all models are white and slender.
- Needs a boost of oomph, scenes seem clinical at times.
Bottom Line:
As an admitted fetishist of dressing room porn, I honestly believe you could give me the controls of a site like this and I could make it into a top site.
Years ago, one of my exes would send me pictures from the dressing room in a store. It seriously became a near obsessive fetish of mine. I was the dumbass saying, "Go try on some more clothes" knowing I would have to pay for them if she liked them.
What that site is to me is a new twist on solo porn. For roughly half of the video the model changes clothes, poses, takes pictures of herself and this is supposed to be turning her on. After 10 minutes of this teasing, she sits down or sometimes stands and masturbates.
On that part of it they do fine. The dressing room part is mostly lost. These are critical to a scene playing to this fetish:
Outside noise. What good is it to masturbate in an indoor dressing room if you don't believe someone is just outside the door?
Attempted holding in of moans. There's none of that here. These women are moaning like they are in the privacy of their bedroom with no one within 1,000 ft of them.
Have them nude while opening the door. I do like that they vary the panties, the pantyhose, the outfits, and they have some really pretty models.
I think the easiest way to point out the biggest negative is it's like there is no thought or production. I think I described it before as the model is just sitting inside a box on a set. When you do fetish content, how believable it is, is very important.
The numbers show 153 scenes which is much higher than when I was last here and they only had 58. I don't like bashing the model choices but they started out this site with Apolonia and Lil' Caprice. They're still the two models I know on the site. Most of these other models are completely new to me but I'm sure they're not amateurs.
Their technical quality is as good as you can ask for. Every scene has 720p, 1080p and 4K resolution videos. The photos are almost 6000 long end and downloadable.
They're doing so much right it's just the content isn't as good as it could be. This comes across as a very softcore site but it's not. There's anal play, dildos, Magic Wands, it's moderate level or higher masturbation.
I think they would even be better off just forgetting the dressing room part. This is going to be a bad analogy but it's like a site calling itself shower masturbation. And the person gets in the shower without turning the shower on and masturbates.
You could probably say this is the exact type site that's not good for obsessive people. It's still a good, solo, panties, pantyhose, masturbation site with some of the best technical standards.
As far as I know there are two types of dressing room fetishes. One is what this site does. You get to watch what goes on in the dressing room. The other is, the risk, almost exhibitionism, taboo style and of course that would be the one I'm into.
I think my score is somewhat objective. I try to bring as much subjectivity to reviews as I can but I'm sure there's people into this and it's really good at what it does. I guess it's just not perverted enough for me. I'll continue to keep tabs on this site. I'm sure they will have to change things up eventually.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For my money, the best interracial network on the internet.
- I'm counting 23 sites, including some of the groundbreaking sites in the genre.
- Gloryhole and Gloryhole Initiations are enough to me. Those two sites alone have nearly 1,000 Gloryhole scenes on them.
- 5,650 total scenes according to their member's area homepage, 1,270 models, 900,000+ pictures.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Good enough navigation for a network this size. The hub page is quite useful and you don't have to sign into each site.
- The only thing limited is they charge extra for 4K.
- Some of the sites are sleepers to me and I mean that in a good way. You could easily look over Zebra Girls which is a very good interracial lesbian site.
- Two gay sites as well, they're covering most of the bases.
- Epoch is the biller
Cons:
- Once you go to each site it becomes a scroll fest. I think I once commented that I broke my scroll wheel on this network.
- They have some but I would like to see more black girls with white guys. Surely if you can make a great network last 20+ years with the name Dogfart you can find some more black girls.
- Some recycling going on
Bottom Line:
Dogfart has been around so long that the first time I ever watched a porn scene online it was by them and it took all night to download it on a dial-up connection. I'm throwing a little humor in here, some of their youngest models were not even born when Dogfart started. That's impressive.
I'm going to list the sites you receive and total amount of scenes each site has. I always felt like Dogfart was a broad network. There's some content on here I never look at and there's some I always join for so seeing the number counts will help with others like me so they can see how much content has been added to their favorite site(s).
I'll be blunt, I don't like the solo sites they have and really would be okay with just having Gloryhole, Gloryhole Initiations, Watching Mom/Daughter Go Black, Zebra Girls, We Fuck Black Girls and Black on Blondes.
Which I think shows what I mean when I say it's a broad network.
It's very hard to say how often they are updating since all their sites have their most recent scenes listed as 2020. They are definitely recycling on some of these sites. There's a comment on one that says 2020 release date and the comment was in 2013. I'm not going to take off for it since it's on the sites I don't like.
Gloryhole porn was one of the first fetishes I realized I had. That goes into that suspension of belief and you wonder what your girlfriend or wife would do if she was in a bathroom and a dick popped through a hole in the wall. It was an early one for me so I was probably just in my early 20s.
Their style of interracial porn is better than other interracial sites, for me. Dogfart takes care of my interests in interracial porn.
If you're into 4K, you're not going to be happy. They currently have a spring break special of upgrading each scene to 4K for $3.99 PER scene. I don't watch 4K. Not a big deal to me. They have good camerawork, I would call it professional, their 1080p and 720p videos are very clear on my 1080p television.
The amount of content will keep you busy for a long time and I continue to believe we should elevate these networks that are not charging us extra for HD downloads.
I think I've said this before. These are not the prettiest female models, not in an overall view, they have some pretty models here but some of them are average at best.
I think Gloyhole stands out there since they seem to get better looking models on it and of course the Gloryhole scenes have evolved. They're now having sex through the Gloryhole, not just blowjobs. You can tell they've tried adding small parts like the woman masturbating a little before the dick pops through the hole in the wall.
I haven't run into any download limits and the site works well. To the other side of it, the older scenes really need to be remastered.
It's a lot of content and it's a site I join once a year to catch up on my favorite sites listed above.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My favorite, most entertaining site about "family porn". It's the only one I've joined multiple times.
- They are up to 263 scenes, the last time I reviewed it, 7/3/17, they only had 113 scenes.
- Each update has a video, photos, screencaps and all can be downloaded. They update once a week and it's another rare site where nearly every update is worth downloading.
- Download speeds are always very good (90%), almost too fast since it makes it nearly impossible to do anything else on the internet while downloading.
- Terrible acting that is a pro. They're not even trying. It does make it entertaining and less "creepy".
- Long scenes that showcase and highlight all that poor acting. Average scene is around 45 minutes. If you ever wanted comedy porn this is near it.
Cons:
- Switched billers to Rocketgate, I have good experiences with Rocketgate and a couple of recent annoying ones. It used to be Epoch.
- Navigation can be frustrating.
- It's a Team Skeet standalone site but you get all the ads and frustration (see bottom line).
Bottom Line:
Family Strokes is a site I really fell for back in 2017. There's just enough taboo feeling (if you concentrate enough), there's humor, there's very attractive models and it's consistent. Consistency is something I think is often overlooked in porn. These guys have hit their zone with this site.
The numbers are now plenty good with 263 scenes. Every scene has 480, 540, 720 and 1080 resolutions available for download. They have real photo sets not just screencaps and you can download those. If you like screencaps they have those for download too.
They're updating once a week. I think they could improve that a little but go back to my cons. There is a certain level of frustration here. It's only going to get worse as they add more scenes. Navigation is limited to ... that. Nothing. You can get away from the mess of ads by going to "sites" and selecting Family Strokes. Once inside you can click the model's name and it will show her content across the network including on sites you don't have access to. Which means you're stuck with just scrolling through the 263 scenes. They have a model that I have seen before but hadn't paid much attention to her named Sofie Reyez. I clicked her name and it shows me 15 of 14 scenes. How does that even happen? And I only have access to 1 of them. You can't even use the model list without getting ALL their scenes.
Enough bitching but they do need to fix that. The scenes here are like most family porn scenes except I think the Team Skeet producers have fun with it. You will even see the models laugh when they're supposed to be most serious. Yes, your stepbrother just pulled his hard dick out, stop smiling! I don't know the Team Skeet guys but many years ago here on PU, I reviewed a couple of their sites and they were so excited about it and offered me t-shirts, keychains and you can tell they don't take themselves too seriously.
That's a plus for me. This is a niche that Japanese porn does better than anyone if you want it realistic. These guys do it the opposite.
They have 359 models on this site alone. They got stepsisters and stepcousins. You might want to skip the beginning of some of them. The humor sometimes, at least for me, outdoes the sex.
You all think I'm exagerrating about how deep the stepfamily goes here. One of the newer scenes is Sexy Selfies for her Stepgrandpa. I laughed when I typed it. You even have Supervised Stepsibling Sex.
Once you get by the humor you have a really good porn site. The cons hurt a little on the score. That navigation will get worse over time. I've heard they're going to offer a bigger network package or whatever the hell they call it. It would help the navigation problems.
I've not canceled this one yet so Rocketgate better not give me no shit this time. The last one they told me my account didn't exist so I couldn't cancel it. Then, I had to email them and they found the account that didn't exist. That does hurt a little too.
I join it twice a year despite the problems and that's probably the best compliment I can give it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The future best lesbian site on the internet. As long as they keep updating.
- Only 73 scenes currently but 70 of them are 70 of the best lesbian scenes I've seen in years.
- Updates every 3-4 days.
- Top-tier models in every scene.
- Scenes are full of story and are in the 35-45 minute range each.
- Epoch is the biller.
- 95 models, various ages, most are in their teens/twenties.
- Excellent navigation and clean layout. It's a new site. Tags are accurate.
Cons:
- Size of the site has to be mentioned here.
- Price of the site is not going to be popular at $19.95 for streaming and $29.95 for downloading.
- Comes with no other sites.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn was my second favorite porn genre behind solo back 10-15 years ago but maybe more than any genre, lesbian porn has just slacked.
This site is owned by the group that owns Jules Jordan, a very good producer, director and actor. You can see the quality here both technically and in production values.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p download options. The picture sets rival the top photo sites in both quality (technical and editing). Pictures are studio photo sets and top out at 4000 high end with zip downloads available. They also have screencaps as well.
The scenes remind me of Viv Thomas' heyday, back when a producer put two or more beautiful women in front of a camera and told them to go at it.
There are stories in each scene. These stories are even believable. Like two older real estate agents seducing a younger woman who is looking to buy a house. The model list just brought me up to date on the who's who of newer models. How have I not seen Alina Lopez before? Her scene on here with London River just went into my top 10 lesbian scenes of all-time. Have producers just slacked on this Alina Lopez and what looks like a lizard tongue?
The scenes are sensual, sometimes rough, there's licking everywhere, tribbing or scissoring whichever you prefer. There's kissing. There's a man walking around in the area of the house behind them without even noticing them. That's porn.
Most of the scenes do have the younger/older side to them but not near as extreme in the age difference. Stepmom finds out her stepdaughter is dating a girl and starts lecturing on how it's wrong, stepdaughter shows her why it's right.
My leaning here is Jules Jordan or whoever owns it went all in and decided they were finally going to make a lesbian site that whether realistic or not, showcases multiple naked women enjoying themselves and each other.
One of the big positives that didn't make its way into the pros is the models all speak English. If you're a Viv Thomas fan you know a lot of his lesbian scenes were great but hardly no English.
When do you ever watch a 40 minute scene and think, "I wish that was longer"? I did it here.
Here's some models that really stand out to me including the ageless wonder that is Brandy Love, Alina Lopez (she's in 8 scenes here), Adriana Chechik, Adira Allure, a personal favorite I haven't found much of Alex Coal, Autumn Falls, Cecilia Lion, Eliza Ibbara, Emily Willis and the shocker for me ... Georgia Jones. I thought she retired years ago? The always welcome Gina Valentina. The model list alone sells this site. I want to retire from my regular job and become the cameraman on this site.
I worked that in to compliment the cameraperson. Lesbian porn camerawork is very important and you won't miss hardly anything here, from a pretty 22 year old's tongue licking around an older woman's butthole at closeup, to the lost art of filming tribbing. The best filming of it is when the camera gets close enough to see the wet pussy lips sticking together and they do it here.
The size of the site might be a problem for some but it's not for me. I just hope they maybe come through with a promo. Especially if they're going to continue to update regularly and have this high of level models on it. I would join for a year just to see how great this site is going to become.
If it's an added plus, the site has only been updating since August 25, 2019 and they're already at 75 scenes. Maybe Jules is going to throw together a network with his own site and the other sites that group owns?
I would still just join this one for a year if a decent price was available. I think this is also as close to a porn site has got to with porn for men and women. It's not always soft and delicate, it's not always hard and violent but it has a little of all.
I can't say a new site that's not based on some weird fetish I have from high school, has impressed me this much ever.
My favorite scenes include the models starting out with light kissing and fingering themselves. That's not common these days. The acting is even good.
I didn't leave her out on purpose but there are 3 Vina Sky scenes here that are some of her best work. The threesome with Scarlett Sage and Adria Rae is really creative and enjoyable.
The cons are not big deals to me. I probably won't join it more than 3-4 times a year unless the price comes down a little but getting me to join a site 3-4 times a year these days is something only a few sites can do. I also would recommend it to collectors and you know you have to do the download option. I just download everything, videos, photos, screencaps.
It's as high as I'll go on a score for a site this size and hope they'll keep pushing it with the creativity and top models. It has 100 potential.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tainster which is now part of Sinx is still around and maybe less impressive in total numbers, but more impressive in quality than they were.
- 15 sites are included.
- Navigation is far easier to use on this Sinx version of Tainster (but see cons).
- Party Hardcore, Fully Clothed Sex, Mad Sex Party, were and still are pioneering sites.
- Easy cancel with vxsbill
- Good download speeds (75-80% of max)
Cons:
- Well, they don't have near as much content as they used to have. Bottom line will explain why.
- No longer exclusive.
- Navigation is easy since there's no real navigation. You choose your site. The scenes show up. No model list.
- No update schedule or dates on scenes, some scenes are split into parts to inflate video count.
Bottom Line:
Tainster formerly Erromaxx (spelling?) has long been a network for those with different interests in porn than as the Clockwork Orange taught us, just the "Ol' in and out".
If you go to Videosz and look at the studios for "Seventeen" you'll find a lot of Tainster's old content on there on DVDs like Party Hardcore Best of Volume. That's why it's not exclusive anymore, but there is a positive to it.
The content that's now on the Tainster sites is all HD quality. Which was for a long time a negative against them since they had scenes going back to 2005. Those were often 480p at best.
This new version of Tainster is like a slimmed down, trimmed the fat off version. I can say some of these scenes are new to me. I hadn't been a member since 2015. The camerawork in the group, party scenes has also improved. I'm guessing they are using an editing tool since if you were ever a member of Party Hardcore, they would have cameras switching from one area to another every few minutes. It looks like they have put together the best parts and made those into scenes on the group sites.
The problem is there's a lot of fat cut off. Mad Sex Party has 64 scenes on it. When you look closer it's really just about 15-16 scenes as they're cut into 30 minute parts.
That problem only presents itself on the group scene sites.
My personal favorite site on their network is Fully Clothed Sex. I'm a pervert. I know that. I like seeing panties slid over and cum squirting on a woman's pretty sweater. They still do Fully Clothed Sex better than anyone ... except the Japanese. They have around 350 Fully Clothed Sex scenes so you can see they've not licensed it out on the level of Mad Sex Party and Party Hardcore. Two of the scenes on Fully Clothed Sex are listed as "new". I have no idea of knowing if they are. I don't have them in my collection so I'll take their word on it.
For those into the harsher side of porn they have the site Tyrannized. This can range from serious flogging to even burning each other with a lit cigarette. It's not really my interest but it also shows what a broad audience they could appeal to.
As for their pioneering ways, Party Hardcore, while not officially considered a CFNM site, was one of the first sites I saw CFNM porn. It was the flagship site for many years. This site has one major strength beyond other CFNM sites. It's set in a club where there are 50+ women and these male strippers walk around until one or two or twenty of the women start grabbing them, giving them blowjobs, having sex with them in front of everyone and the best part to me always was when two of women started having sex. It is a smaller version of the site. They not only have a small selection of the original Party Hardcore content, they also have all the "alternate cams" which shows the other side of licensing their content out.
As confusing as this might seem it's really not that confusing. They've licensed out their SD (480p content) and focused on their better quality content. If you only like HD or higher they've done you a huge favor. If you were able to enjoy the 480p and even lower older scenes, you might not be as happy about the change.
I think that's okay since it does show different women from each cam. It's just the number of total scenes you're going to get is very small just like on Mad Sex Party.
The rest of the sites seem fine and mostly untouched. If I remember right, they only had a few of these sites in their earliest years so maybe they didn't have a lot of SD content on those to remove.
The price is too high in my opinion unless you want to join it for a month and get what you want. As a network as a whole, it's easily one of the most unique. I raised the score from my previous review since they made it easier for me to find the high technical quality scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Older/younger porn which I didn't expect since it's GrandparentsX. Some major fetishes explored here.
- Up to 4K on the video downloads, also 1080, 720 and 540.
- 35 videos and 34 photo sets, no download limits. While the amount of content is low, I downloaded every scene and have kept them for the fetishes they go into (will explain in BL). Also has 8 videos that I guess are from another of their sites, you can only stream those.
- The younger female models are very attractive, I would say top-tier quality.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- No ads but they do list scenes from their other sites.
Cons:
- Small collection. This is the only reason the score isn't higher.
- Sporadic updates, each of the last two months only have one official update with both months also having a "bonus" update you can stream. In January, they had 3 updates. December only had 1 official and 1 "bonus".
- Scenes could be longer, 4 people in a 22 minute scene is a little shorter than I would like.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that appealed to me simply because I saw some of the fetishes it includes.
I'm not a big fan of old and young porn. Especially when it's one older person with one younger person. I don't see the taboo of it and am not quite old enough to really enjoy older men with younger women.
But this site, it has threesomes and foursomes. This means you see scenes where a younger guy is pounding away at a much older woman while his pretty, young girlfriend masturbates while watching them. There are scenes that go into swinging with young couples switching partners with an older couple.
This reminds me of the type or porn that breaks a mold. It's one I've talked about before. They are adding a voyeur into the scene as one watches. My favorite DVD series of the last 20 years was "The Watcher" by Vivid. This site touches on that fetish.
A bonus is all of the older people are not unattractive. Some of the women look similar to women you would see on Anilos.
Still, it needs more updates. The reason I'm not a porn site owner is I would put this high on my priority list and have a minimum of 4 updates per month.
The numbers aren't impressive with only 35 videos and unless my counting is wrong, 34 photo sets. The quality of the videos is excellent. Every video has 4K and the site has only been updating since November 2018.
It seems their initial plan was to have it be older/younger women as the first 3 scenes they updated with were just females. After those, they started adding older and younger men. All of the non-bonus scenes have more than 2 people in them. With the most being 5 people.
It's a site with a lot of potential in my eyes. But not everyone sees things the way I do. I think playing to the voyeur watching (viewer) by putting a voyeur in the scene give the viewer a feeling of she or he is doing the same thing I'm doing.
The site also comes with a streaming network of over 14,000 videos. It's not of much use to me but I thought I should mention it. This one falls under the quality/quantity amount of value heading. I downloaded 35 videos I'm likely to keep all of. That is more than I can say for a lot of sites with 10,000 scenes and I do think it's because of the fetish. For years, porn has tried threesomes with all 3 people involved directly in the sex for the entire scene. That formula is stale for me. This site gives me something I haven't seen done on a regular basis since the early 2000s. I would like to go higher on the score. I could always use the old there's 35 scenes, that would equal 7 DVDs so it's still a good value thought.
I think it is and you should check the previews out if you're curious.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some more taboo stepfamily porn.
- 147 scenes, videos, photos and screencaps.
- CCbill
- 121 models, some scenes have multiple models in them.
- Ran by the Nubiles group, but is not part of their network.
- High quality on everything.
Cons:
- Scenes are not as likable as similar niche/stepfamily sites.
- Some scenes are under 30 minutes. In this niche, as unbelievable as it usually is, the build up and story mean everything
- Indistinguishable niche/poor acting.
Bottom Line:
I'll admit a mistake on my part. I thought this was a Team Skeet standalone site. I realized when I saw my bank statement said XFC that's it's a Nubiles owned standalone site. I like Nubiles but it kind of lowered my expectations on them pulling off what is supposed to be a taboo niche.
I went big word in my cons. Indistinguishable niche, some of these scenes do nothing to make you even think these are stepsiblings. It's not that I want it to be completely believable, it's just it's like plain old hardcore, gonzo scenes.
My score isn't bad on it. I know that some might not mind that problem/con.
The models are cute and at times way too serious to fit this niche. It's like stepfamily falling in love porn. I'm being too hard on it. It's good, especially if you like the models. I will say the scenes with more than two people in them are very good. It breaks up that feeling of mushy/heartcore and those are also the more entertaining. It will be a stepsister that bets her best friend something with the loser having to have sex with the stepsister's stepbrother. It's at least something.
I didn't have any step-siblings so I don't know if step-siblings just jump up and start having sex or if they kind of fall into because of some game they were playing ... which is what I prefer to believe.
The video quality goes up to 1080p and goes down to 270p, I'm still downloading the 720p myself and they look very good. Photos are a strength here as the Nubiles group used to be more focused on photos than videos. You can tell, very high quality, professional studio style photos.
I'm just starting to think this niche is getting stale. They're probably going to need to watch some Japanese stepfamily porn to improve the niche. Either that or do like Team Skeet does and go just silly and completely unbelievable with it (Family Strokes).
The site at least has a good update schedule but I would take 1/2 the scenes if they put more work into each of the scenes. I don't even know that it's that this niche is that popular or if it's that porn finally found a story or angle that gets into the taboo section of our brains. It's worth a join, especially if you like the models but there are better stepfamily sites out there.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good MILF site that has a lot of sites.
- Very good video quality with everything on the site having up to 1080p.
- Photos and screencaps, both are downloadable.
- No limits on downloads that I've found.
- Very good download speeds (85% of max).
- Some interesting niches that porn could use more of including JOI (jerk off instruction).
- Nearly averages an update per day, seems to be 6 updates in 7 days.
- Scenes are generally fun-orientated, I would even use the word silly.
Cons:
- Way too many ads and upsells.
- Layout makes it near impossible to count scenes since they mix in the scenes you don't have access to without upgrading.
- I'm not for sure how many more times I'm going to be able to believe the 38 year old model is surprised to see a hard dick.
Bottom Line:
I had been meaning to join this site for the JOI scenes and the MylfBody (working out, exercise clothes) scenes.
Their JOI scenes are worth joining for if you're into JOI. Besides the talking and teasing, they will use a dildo to mimic jerking you off then put it in their mouth or pussy. This is a niche that I think is very undervalued in porn. They go a step further than most JOI sites with their models going all the way to nude.
The MilfBody site is also very good for those that are into fit women, women working out and women wearing workout clothes.
Here's the problem: These sites are not very big. Here's a list of the sites you get with Mylf with the number of scenes in parenthesis.
MylfBlows (21)
MilfBody (36)
Milfty (73)
Mom Drips (38)
FullofJOI (35)
Mylfed (37)
GotMylf (53)
Lone MILF (31)
MylfBoss (16)
They also have a MylfX series with each one have a subtitle.
MylfX TeamSkeet HD (20)
MylfX Fucking Awesome HD (18)
MylfX Lady Fyre (21)
MylfX SpankMonster (1)
When you combine them all it's a decent sized collection. I just get the feeling this could have been done in a much simpler way than having 13 different sites. In some ways, the multiple site format is good. I wanted all the FullofJOI scenes and all of the MilfBody scenes so it made those easy to get to but you will see scenes on the other sites that would have fit on MilfBody and anyway, how many ways can you spell Mylf or make a pun with it? As silly as these guys can be it kind of makes me feel like they're just sitting around trying to see who can come up with the funniest name for a Milf site.
I would have went with Let's Get Mylfical for the fitness one.
Enough joking for now. The models are very good looking, there are implants and some tattoos. I don't know many of these models. They are pros I'm sure. I do know Chanel Preston and her MilfBody scene was one of the ones that made me want to join.
There's a point I made about MILFs in the past and that is they're usually beyond the shyness stage and I think they generally perform better than the younger models. My favorite age group of models is 25-35, I would think most of these women fit into that group.
Good sized collection, very good video quality, good update schedule, downloadable photos, it has just about everything you could ask for.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network dedicated to handjobs and making you sign-in a lot.
- Marked improvement since my last review in 2017, models are prettier, new themed sites, there's only so much you can do with a dick and a hand, but all kidding aside, there's nice improvements here.
- Good PU discount, their homepage doesn't show the discount and says it's $29.95 but once you click to join it gives you the $14.95 option.
- Easy to use navigation and while the network hub doesn't work the way you might like it to, I actually think it's better this way, will explain.
- 11 sites total, all except one are handjob/blowjob/tease related.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Downloadable videos (still can't believe that's a pro these days) and downloadable photo sets.
- I'm not for sure if it's the biggest handjob site/network but I'll get to the numbers in the bottom line. I think based on my memory it is the biggest handjob network.
- No ads beyond a page of ads when you first sign in.
Cons:
- The video download options and quality and filenames need some work. You have one full scene download option or you can download them in 4 parts. The full scene downloads vary from 480p, 720p or 1080p. You don't know what it will be until you've downloaded it and they're all named "high".
- This was a pro for me, it might be a con for you. The network hub shows all the sites available. When you click one, you have to login to it. That's frustrating for some but I will explain why I prefer it.
- Update schedule is kind of all over the place.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined this network it was after seeing a few of their scenes on tube sites. I think those scenes came from their site Club Tug which is the big site here. It was mostly older women, sometimes with a younger woman helping, in what was similar to CFNM with edging thrown in. They've since added multiple new sites. I think a common complaint for the older scenes was the models weren't always attractive. The newer scenes on their newer sites seem to be higher level models.
One con I didn't include is one I haven't ever figured out whose fault it is. Rocketgate is the biller. I have used them many times and I don't like that they store or remember your purchases and try to get you to sign up without putting your payment info in. One of the cards they have on file for me expired 2 years ago. Even worse, here on this site, it rechecks the pre-checked cross-sale, it also changed the price from $14.95 to $19.95. If the biller is doing this these sites need to let them know it's going to hurt their business.
The con about the hub requiring you to sign in on each site, which kind of makes it not really a hub. I like this better because you get a member's area that is exclusive to whatever site you sign into. So, when you click the model's list, say on their site Mylked, all the models are on Mylked. You don't get network-wide results. I prefer that. They do give you a randomly generated username and password so you have to keep on your notepad to remember it or copy/paste it in.
Club Tug is still the big site here. It has 436 scenes by my count, the hub says it has 500+, but just doing simple math of 12 scenes per page, 36 pages = 432 + 4 more on the 37th page. It's updating once a week. This site has a wide range of scenes from one woman giving the guy a handjob/blowjob while another woman watches and masturbates to grannies giving handjobs.
They have Tease POV which has 75 scenes and looks to be updating once per month. These are really good scenes that include more creativity than most handjob sites.
A newer site for them is Finish Him, it has 78 scenes and these are more like edging, some have two women, very good scenes. These newer sites they have really have added some life to the network. It updates once per month.
The newest site, Mylked, is the traditional milking table type scene where the woman lays under a table with the man laying on the table with his dick through a hole, kind of like horizontal gloryhole. There are 41 scenes on it and I would say they are some of the best on the site.
This is where it gets more complex. Cum Blast City looks like fake cum but after watching multiple scenes it looks real. This site would be very popular for those that like seeing a woman covered with cum. It has 320 scenes. The more I look at it, it looks like some of the scenes are fake dicks with fake cum, others are real dicks with real cum that must not have had sex in a decade.
Over 40 Handjobs has 240 scenes here and they're what they say, some are just an over 40 woman giving a younger guy a handjob, others are an over 40 with a younger woman giving a guy a handjob.
A fairly rare one with Ebony Tugs, there's 50 scenes of black girls over varying age, attractiveness and body type giving handjobs.
See Mom Suck is next with 112 scenes. This one isn't as good. Some of the mom's look like they just stepped out of the 1980s. Just being fair.
Mean Massage has 131 scenes, some of this is humiliation, but it's not that bad and some of it is quite good.
Teen Tugs has 211 scenes, these are very good and do good job of following the teen theme except for the few models that look like they probably have teenage daughters.
Last is Petite 18, it's out of place here, it has 71 scenes and they're all regular porn sexual intercourse scenes.
I did that so I could add the scenes up. That's 1,694 handjob-related scenes and I'm not counting the Petite 18 scenes in that number. I'm positive that makes it the biggest handjob site on the internet.
I spent more time on this than usual. It looks like the sites Mylked, Finish Him, Tease POV and the newer Club Tug scenes are the ones with 720p or 1080p videos. The rest of the sites seems to 480p. I based that on downloading the 4 newest scenes from each site. I'm not going to take anything off for those but those 480p ones aren't helping the score either. I sit close enough to a 32" monitor that 480p isn't terrible. I'm more bothered by the filenames all being "high". I have a folder full of "high", "high (1)", "high (2)" and so on. I think with a little work there they could score even higher. I'm giving them a 13 point boost over my last score. They do seem to be working on improving the site and adding new scenes with better looking models, plus the higher video quality.
The different scenarios they use does make it a little more unique than other handjob sites, too. Recommended to tease, handjob/blowjob fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of teasing, Downblouse Loving is included as is Panty Loving.
- Great tagging system, will detail below in bottom line.
- There are 15,460 videos between the sites with right at 13,000 coming from Downblouse Loving.
- A clothing fetishist's paradise.
- Amateur models as far as I can tell.
- 4K Videos starting in 2018, 1080p, 720p also available. The older videos have 720p, so HD all the way back to beginning in 2009 and some of the 2009 ones have 1080p also.
- Most of the models are very attractive. You will find some you're not that attracted to but for amateur models they're consistently above-average in attractiveness.
- Some scenes go beyond tease. We will just act like those models got so turned on from teasing that they had to masturbate.
- CCBill is the biller.
- Four updates per day on Downblouse Loving and two per day on Panty Loving.
- 117 models on Panty Loving and 313 on Downblouse Loving.
Cons:
- One of my fetishes is going to show up here. I would like to see a lot more upshorts.
- It doesn't bother me but I know some are turned off by smoking scenes and there are some on here.
Bottom Line:
After my 99 on Zishy, a mostly tease, mostly non-nude site, I figured Downblouse Loving would be a site I would really like and I do.
I normally wouldn't cover the tags but I feel like it helps you get an idea of what type of content they have.
Ass, Boobs (topless), Dancing, Downblouse, Face, Masturbation, Masturbation Instruction, Non-Nude, Nude, Panties, Pantyhose, Peeing, Pussy, Revealing tops but not downblouse, Sleeping, Smoking, Toys, Up blouse, Upshorts, Upskirts and Water Pistol.
There's quite a bit more nudity here than your average non-nude/tease site. I don't know why they stopped the Water Pistol ones. They only have a few of those and they shoot a water pistol at a woman in a skimpy, see through shirt and see through panties. Maybe it's just they are fun to watch. Especially when you add the British accents.
My biggest clothing fetish is upshorts followed closely by upskirts. The downblouse is good when you see it here. I don't think I had ever really paid that much attention to the downblouse tease but they do a very good job of showing the woman doing regular, everyday tasks, and she bends over to pick something up with her shirt falling forward and you get a full view of her boobs.
This type of porn appeals to me. I have always said my favorite porn is the kind I can see happening everyday. I see women in loose shirts everyday. Now I know about what I could expect to see if I saw down their shirts. I think upskirt has the same effect.
The numbers are very high with over 15,000 videos and adding 6 per day between Downblouse Loving and Panty Loving. The videos are short. I have seen a few that are 5-6 minutes. Some are as short as 1-2 minutes. I think the short length of these videos adds to how much I like them. If you see an upskirt video that lasts 17 minutes you're going to lose the feeling that you're seeing something you're not supposed to see. If you see one that's 2 minutes and the upskirt is only fully exposed for 1 minute of it that's much more realistic.
My main complaint is they need more upshorts. Between the two sites they have 40 upshorts videos. In comparison, they have almost 2,000 upskirt videos.
The first time I ever used a TGP site it was to look up upshorts pictures and that was back in probably 2000.
I joined this site after reading mbaya's review and knowing that I usually like tease more than he does. I also used the method he talked about. There are no pictures but you can watch the videos in VLC and have it take snapshots. It's just like with any exhibitionism or teasing site. Sometimes having the still photo shows what you missed in the video.
I do think this type of site(s) has a broader audience than potential members realize. I would guess most of us started our interest in the female body when we saw up a woman's skirt or short or down her shirt.
Having the scenes with models doing everyday activities makes it even better.
One thing to notice is the model number to scene number ratio. Between the sites they have 430 models and over 15,000 videos. That means there are a lot of models on here with 30+ videos.
The video quality is impressive too. To have 15,000+ scenes with the worst maximum resolution being 720p tells they really go for the quality. Even though I don't have a 4K monitor anymore, the 4K scenes make for really great screenshots/stills.
They have another site called Only Looking and it says it was their first site. You can add access to it for $2.95 for a year. It also says the Only Looking Archives will soon be included with the membership to Downblouse Loving. They have a section of bonus videos also that are ones they decided not to use on their site.
It's a very good tease, some nudity, some masturbation site that lets your mind remember all those times you almost saw up a skirt or down a blouse. Add it to my list of sites to rejoin, especially considering how often they update.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A webcam site that does a lot of small things right that other webcam sites screw up.
- Currently 9,994 models, not all are online at the same time and some aren't active but they have a very good, large selection of models.
- Body types, looks, even ages are all well-represented.
- A credit/token system that makes perfectly good sense and to me is quite a bit cheaper to use than most cam sites.
- Models that don't make you think you're going to be broke before they're naked.
- What is probably the biggest pro is it feels professional, it's well-explained, it is easy to use.
- Some of the models go all the way nude without tips/credits coming in.
- Recordings of cam shows that you can buy with credits.
Cons:
- I think this applies to all cam sites, it can get expensive if you're not careful.
- Have to keep up with your favorite models schedule to see their shows. There's probably nothing that can be done about that.
Bottom Line:
I have started liking cam sites just over the last few years. I admit, I usually am just cheap about it and just watch whatever the model is willing to do without tips. That's one thing that makes this cam site different for me. There's not a tip menu that says you have to pay X amount of credits to get the model naked.
Their credits system makes logical sense which is unusual for a cam site. If you pay 25 Euros you get ... 25 credits. Most cam sites have you pay 25 dollars or Euros and they give you 250 to 2,500 credits and you feel like you got a great deal until you find out it takes 5,000 credits to get the model naked.
That is a focus of this review. Each model's cam has her price for private show in the bottom corner of her cam. I've seen some as cheap as 2 credits per minute. That equals out to a 12 minute private show for 25 Euros. That's pretty cheap compared to most cam sites.
You also can purchase recorded cam shows. Some of these are free too. The prices do vary greatly. I bought a 41 minute one for 5 credits. Right beside it was a 12 minute one that was 50 credits.
Continuing on the professional feel of the site, it's not like Chaturbate where you have 10,000 people sending a message in the chat box that says, "Show your ASS!" every 5 seconds. It seems more balanced here. The other viewers are respectful and the models seem to really enjoy themselves. I haven't seen one get mad. Most of them will give you a little flash if you ask nicely. Some of them will go completely nude.
As I mentioned, you get a good blend of slim, sporty, even chubby models. You could complain a little that nearly all are white.
They have tags that help you find the type of model you're looking for and they are for the most part accurate.
You also can get some enjoyment without spending a fortune. You could spend 100 Euros and get five 10 minute private shows from the models that charge 2 credits per minute. I don't really understand the difference in the prices from model to model. I've seen a few as high as 4 credits per minute. Maybe it's popularity or even seniority?
Either way, it's a very good cam site that you can join and have some fun without breaking the bank.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge teen site that is a nice throwback to the Euro Porn Boom era 2006-2012.
- 3,831 models, 7,240 videos and 10,760 photo sets.
- Averages 1 photo set and 1 video update per day, with some days having a bonus streaming video.
- Simple to use download interface, videos and pictures can be downloaded. Details in bottom line.
- Something that's rare on a site this size, good tagging system, there's no way to know just how accurate the tags are but the ones I've used were accurate.
- Navigation makes it easy to find scenes like the ones you like, more in bottom line.
- Good variety in niches, solo, boy/girl, lesbian.
- Has a streaming only network with it with over 13,000 videos.
Cons:
- The bonus videos are ads for their other sites. You can stream the video. If you click download it tries to upsell you the other site.
- I try not to complain too much about ads but one I will always complain about is a moving ad (showing sex). It's just in the main hub page but those moving ads annoy me.
Bottom Line:
I can remember joining this site close to 15 years ago. The funny part back then, I was thinking Club Seventeen was Hustler's amateur series in their magazine, the user submitted section. Which I now remember was called Beaver Hunt. Club Seventeen was a good surprise back then and it still is.
I don't mean it as negative when I say it reminds me of sites from the 2006-2012 era of the Euro Porn Boom, that's as good of a compliment as you'll get from me. It's a huge site that focuses on pretty, young women. Where it has an advantage is their content is grouped into series' that make sense. For example, Kinky Teens, you can click that and it shows you all the scenes in the Kinky Girls series. It not only shows you the videos in that series but also the picture sets too. In the mood for Anal Teens? Click the series name and you'll find right at 300 scenes in the Anal Teen series. I haven't used this in a review in a long time since most sites don't do it anymore, the KISS principle of Keep It Simple, Stupid. It's nice to see a site doing that instead of giving me 16 levels of filters to click through to find 1 niche.
The content here ranges from great quality tease/panties to all out hardcore. Those that have read my reviews over the years know I love tease and solo masturbation, they do it very well here and I will say their hardcore is better than most of these teen sites that try and blend hardcore in.
They're doing good on the quality too. The pictures can be downloaded and newer ones are 2700x4000 or vice versa depending on the orientation. There are some 4K videos, they've had 1080p and/or 720p since 2011-12. When you consider how often they update that adds up to a lot of HD videos over those years.
I do think the series tags really gave this site a boost for me. One that I mentioned earlier, Teenage Masturbation as a favorite of mine. Clicking the series "Teenage Masturbation" brings up around 3,100 solo videos. Just like their hardcore videos are a little more hardcore than most of these teen sites, the masturbation scenes are more explicit too.
There is a large network of streaming only videos that works as an advertisement for other sites and gives you a sample of content from other sites, including the sites owned by Club Seventeen.
I'm probably always going to complain about moving ads. My vision problem is fairly well-known and has been talked about on Porn Users. It seems every moving ad is in the right margin, which my damaged eye is on the right so any movement messes with my eye and believe it or not, it agitates me.
One thing I'm not for sure about as I don't keep up with a lot of the newer models is if these models are pros or amateurs. Most look like amateurs to me. I haven't seen hardly any models I'm familiar with.
They have a unique feature that I only know of one other site using, the clip creator. You select a starting point on the video and ending point (no longer than 5 minutes) and you can just focus on the part you like the most. Videobox has a similar feature and that's the only other site I know of that has that.
This is one of the best teen sites I've joined and somehow, it took me nearly 15 years to make my way back to it. I'll be adding it to my yearly rotation.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best, biggest and longest running (still active) hardcore sites.
- 1,641 scenes as of 1/20/2020, video and photo set included with each scene.
- The continued improvement of the navigation of all the DDF sites is seen here as well.
- 847 models and the majority of them are European glam models crossing over into the world of hardcore.
- They go much more hardcore than I think most porn fans realize with over 350 DP scenes and 850 anal scenes. Those DP scenes are the vaginal and anal DP, not the vaginal and oral DP.
- Updates 4 times per week.
- Very high technical quality (see bottom line)
- No download limits and videos and photos are downloadable.
- Navigation feature that allows you to search by year which dictates the video/technical quality. Very impressive but simple feature other sites should look into.
- Bills through Vendo.
Cons:
- Some of the male talent is annoying and I do think that's a con since a lot of scenes are 2 guys on 1 woman.
- The oldest content needs to be remastered.
Bottom Line:
DDF is still my choice as the best network on the internet. They have real standalone sites that they give you full access to all of them with a network subscription.
Hands on Hardcore was never a favorite DDF site. Usually when dealing with hardcore the only thing that really interests me is who the female model or if it's a unique niche of hardcore. Hands on Hardcore has both of those. There are models here that were once known as sweet and innocent, panty sliders, light masturbation and now they're in the middle of two men dual penetrating them. That makes it an unusual niche since it's not what you're used to seeing from these models.
The navigation here should be a model for other networks. It's not like this is a newer network either. They have worked very hard to make these sites work just like the standalone sites they are. Most networks don't do that. If you're on Hands on Hardcore and click model list, you get the model list just for the models on Hands on Hardcore. If you click a tag on Hands on Hardcore you get just the Hands on Hardcore scenes with that tag in them.
I mentioned the feature that lets you search by year. A lot of sites do that but they have their years grouped by video quality. Watch how nice this is, years 2011-2020 (Full HD), these have 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p. Years 2006-2010 (HDV), these have 720p, 540p and 360p.
That alone tells us there are 15 years of updates with HD quality. They also have 4 years of archive content, some of it has 720p, the very oldest scenes are split into 4-5 parts and that's the ones that need to be merged and remastered but it's less than 50 scenes.
These scenes average right at 30 minutes each. Some I have seen are as short as 20 minutes, there are some in the 40-45 minute range.
The photo sets are very good, are downloadable in zips and I want to say they're not screencaps. Old BTS videos from DDF showed hardcore scenes being photographed separately from the videos and they start with the model fully clothed with a 5-20 photo tease in her clothes. The pictures then show the sex. The photos are available in small, medium and large downloads. The large ones top out at 4000 long end.
The content itself is hardcore. There's no light touching or soft music and to me it's as good as any non-extreme hardcore site. The guys can be annoying. For one, very few speak good English and for two, they're robotic. In some ways that could be a good thing since it allows the focus of the action to be on the woman but when she's 120 pounds and the guys are 220 pounds each it's not exactly easy to see her or focus on her.
There's also an advanced search that would take up all my characters to explain. It has clothing types (more than 20), location (more than 20), action (more than 50), toy type (more than 10) and model type, includes hair color, boob size, eye color, body art, skin color, natural or enhanced boobs and nationality (35 of those).
I did find a few of the actions worth mentioning: Dripping Icicle, Titty Twins and Biting.
Even though it's not my favorite DDF site this site is either the best hardcore standalone site I've been on or it's not far behind. I did notice in the actions it even has Double Vaginal, only 4 of those but it still continues my belief this is not what people expect from a DDF site and that's what makes it good. DDF has long been one of the greatest softcore, glam, solo, passionate lesbian producers then out of nowhere comes this site that looks like it belongs on an American network.
I wouldn't recommend it by itself. The whole network is usually available for a cheaper price than the standalone sites are and as you have read earlier in this review, the navigation is so good it's like having multiple standalone sites. You do have to login on each site. That's a common problem with someone makes a network out of previous standalone sites. The navigation gets messy and you never feel like you're seeing all the content of whichever site you're looking at.
The real compliment is I would rate it as only my 5th or 6th favorite DDF site but based on quantity, quality, navigation, this is a site that's near the top of its genre.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
