| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+There are so many photosets that I couldn't count them all but there are at least 2500 that star Kelly and countless more that star a variety of different models.
+All the photosets can be donwloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from set to set but 1728x1152 is common.
+The videos and photosets are a mixture of b/g, g/g and solo sex scenes, some glamour shots and a variety of other types.
+There is a rather small logo located on the top left of the screen which I found easy to overlook.
+You can get a full access 3 dat trial for 9$ so a real bargain |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con against the site is in regards to desgn.
1-A 1/4 of the screens are used up by a blue background that serves no purpose and limits the viewing options.
2-There is a search window to find content but there are only a few pre-selected keywords and the same scene will come up under more than one of those words.
3-The only way to know what is inside the videos is if you go through the pic section.
-Many of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips/sections.
-Kelly only has b/g sex with her husband(not a con for me but maybe for others).
-There are multplie phototsets and videos of other female performers but no search options so you have to go page by page to find the ones you want. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The first thing I noticed when I got on the site is how badly designed it is and how different it looks from the preview sections. That was quite a shock for me because Kelly's other two sites which are Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity are some amazing sites that I was sure her's would be just as good. It isn't and that is too bad because there is some excellent content here and Kelly is one hot looking 40+ years old woman with large all natural breast and an amazing sexual appetite.
*I don't know if they plan on improving the site but if they aren't then they really should. It's not like they don't already have two great sites to use as template. Even some some basic tweaking would be an improvement. Especially if they fix that stupid 1/4 section of the screen wasted on a blue background and also if they work on the video setion of the site.
*This is an easy site to recomment to anyone who thinks Kelly is hot and is more into sofcore to midcore porn and can overlook the design.
*You may want to avoide joining if you are only interested in kelly's hardcore scenes because you may be disapointed. There is some great stuff but maybe not enough to satisfy your needs. |
|
03-16-13 10:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The bulk of the content is exclusif.
+They have 209 scenes and they add one new scene each week.
+These guys still manage to get the first anal from some really hot Eastern European girls.
+The scenes are well lit, well shot and offer a variety of angles in which to see the action.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 versions from 580x328 1000kbps, 800x450 2500kbps and 1280x720 4000kbps.
+They offer photosets of all the scenes and these can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from 680x1024 up to 1280x854.
+You get access to 4 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The only bonus site with any kind of decent content is double view casting but the content and performers are almsot all the same as FAQ so you aren't really getting anything different.
-The other bonus sites have very little content and most of it was not of any interest to me.
-Some of the older content doesn't appears to be exclusif. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a site that I keep joining because they are one of the few Eastern European site that doesn't seem to have any problem finding new girls willing to do anal. It also doesn't hurt that they shoot some really great scenes and tend to avoid doing circus acts. Now that's not to say that verything is perfect because sometimes there is very little heat between the players but I find that those are on the rare side.
*This site's name tells you everything you need to know about the content so if you want to see young hot Eastern European women have anal sex than you have to join this site. You can visit the bonus sites but I don't know if you will download a lot of the content on these sites. I know that I only downloaded a couple.
**The bonus sites are:
Double View casting: This is basically the same type of anal themed porn as FAQ except that you can download a special viewer which then allows you to view the action from two different angle. The downside is that you have to also download the two version of the same scene to be able to do that and that will eat up a lot of Gig space rather quickly. There are 83 scenes which are dated and they update with about 1-2 new scenes per month.
Jizz on teens: This is basically a two girl on one guy oral sex themed site. Content is not dated but based on the performer for some of the more recent stuff then they are still updating. I' just can't say how often and what the amount is. There are only 24 scenes.
Fuck N Drive: This is basically a site where the girls have sex near, on or inside somekind of vehicle. There are 35 scenes on the site and they were updating wih one new scene about once a month but the last update was in January.
Wanted GFS: This appears to be a mostly photoset only site where the content is largely softcore with some mild midcore as well. I didn't recognize all the girls but some are professional performers. Content is not dated so no way of knowing if and when they update. There are over 210 sets at the moment.
**I increased my score vs my last review by two because these guys have managed to stay on track with their update and they have also managed to introduce so many new girls to us.** |
|
03-09-13 08:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
53
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+You get a discount in Janet's store for her dvd's and other articles.
+The site is still updating(more or less).
+You have about 170 different video scenes.
+This is the only place where you can see Janet do anal or a dp. |
| Cons: |
-Most of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips and way too many of them have 4 clips and more.
-The photosets are mostly stills from the videos and they are also broken into 2 or more sets. Not to mention that you can't actually download them as a single zip file.
-Navigation basically consist of choosing video page, photo page or store page and then scrolling up or down those pages to see what's on them.
-There is no page break on the video page so you have to scroll a very long way up or down to see all of the available videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Janet is a hot red head older woman who simply loves hardcore interracial sex and creampies but unless you want to download most of her videos in multiple clips then you are mostly going to be joining this site to get the discount in her store.
*You would think that anyone who has a personal site would actually have some personal stuff in it but this where you would be very wrong. This is basically a promotional site where you get to sample what is available in Janet's store. That would be fine if the site was free but it is 25$ to join and the only advantage is that you can download her videos in multiple clip format and where the older stuff looks awfull. You don't even get the chance to download complete photosets.
*I wish I could say that there is one single thing that makes joining this site worthwhile but I honestly can't. The 20% off her dvd's is not bad but unless you plan on buying more than 5 dvd's than it's cheaper to simply go on the guest part of her site and purchase her dvd's for 25$ instead of 20$.
*I can't really recommend this site to anyone except anyone that falls under the above comment* |
|
03-06-13 06:45pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
54
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to some very rare content.
+They update with 2 new movies every day.
+Their offer movies not only from the US but France, Germany and Italy as well.
+Some of their Foreign movies are not dubbed into English but in their original language.
+They have small bio's of both the male and female performers with a link to their movies on the site and also to a dvd site where you can buy some of the dvd's.
+They have some third party advertising but it is usually quite small and rarely located where you can see it without looking for it.
-They offer some pics of the stars but don't expect much. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality is rather poor to horrible on a lot of their movies.
-They offer you access to 3 other sites but one has the same stuff as this site, one is mostly stag films and one is gay porn.
-Some of the movies may be made in the US but the copy they have is their European versions so the dialogue is not in English.
-They have a search by keyword but I would avoid it as most of the movies are not properly tagged.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then skipping to the next one.
-Some movies are split into many scenes while others are whole. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is possibly one of the most bittersweet sites that I have ever joined in large part because I love so much of the content and yet really dislike the fact that the quality of the print is so poor that it borders on the unwatchable on many of the titles. Mind you that is not that unusual since the bulk of the content offered by this site is 20 years or older.
*The first and most important thing is that the guys behind this site need to start looking for better copies of their movies and/or try to remaster them to improve the quality. I don't expect that any of the movies will ever make it much above average but that would be more than fine with me as I'm not interested in HD quality anyway.
*The second thing is that they start looking for more titles from their featured stars so that we get access to a wider choice of movies from them. Of course this may be almost impossible to do because there may truly be no copies left anywhere. I hope that this isn't the case because there are many movies that were so amazing that they again deserve to see the light of day.
**I don't know to whom this site will appeal to except people like me who are nostalgic for golden age porn and can overlook flaws in the quality of those videos.
**My score has a lot less to do with quality and more to do with the rarity of the content offered by this site |
|
03-03-13 09:15am
Replies (6)
|
Review
55
|
Teens Analyzed
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to about 19 sites.
+A large percentage of the content is exclusif.
+You can downoad the videos in WMV and MP4.
+They offer each video in HD 1920x1080.
+Most of the videos have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution appeas to be about 1200 x 800 fo most pics.
+Each scene is tagged with some key words so it's possiible to search using those one or more of those keywords. |
| Cons: |
-Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.
-The site isn't really updating all that often anymore.
-A large part of the content is leased material which is available on many other sites.
-They mention access to first anal date but if you try the site then you are sent back to teens analyzed because they used all the content on first anal date to fill this site.
-They have a general search system but I tried using different keywords or names of performers and the results were bad to awful. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The reason why I joined this site is because my membership gave me access to a bunch of sites that I've had my eye on for a few years now and there was no way I could pass up the opportunity to try them. Of course what often happens is that anticipation is never really satisfied and this time was no different. The vast majority of the sites have either badly shot, badly lit or downright crappy porn. There is an abundant amount of leased material aas well. Some of the sites don't have all that much content and they haven't actually updated in years.
*Now it's not all bad because I did find a few videos that were worth keeping and maybe someone else who is maybe less picky can find stuff that they want but be forwarned that expectation may need to be lowered.
*It's hard to say who will be happy with the content on this site or the other ones because it's quite possible that you already have some of their scenes from similar sites out there. I think that if you aren't too picky and prefer a certain amateur feel to your porn then you might find some nice gems here. |
|
02-11-13 06:54pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
56
|
Oldje
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.
+They add about one new scene per week.
+Almost 380 scenes to download.
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership. |
| Cons: |
-They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options.
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I decided to join Oldje one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership. That was one of my cons the last time I joined. Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn't updating anymore. They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn't bother looking at them. Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.
*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones. They still don't bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks. I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.
*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch. This is not the case with Oldje because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men. The sex is never raunchy. It is more soft and romantic. Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn't do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.
**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**. |
|
02-02-13 10:53am
Replies (8)
|
Review
57
|
18 Pussy Club
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+A nice selection of 251 Eastern European models between the ages of 18 and 20 years old.
+Nearly 950 photosets to view online or dowloand.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution varies from 800x1200 to 1067x1600.
+All the content is dated. |
| Cons: |
-Only 195 videos and most of these are broken up into 3 or more small clips.
-The vast majority of the content is solo with the odd toy use and a few b/g scenes.
-Site is now dead because the last update is in 2008.
-I'm not sure how much of the content is exclusif (if any) but I know that some of it is leased.
-Most of the models are given a name that is not the one they are usually known under.
-There is a search box but I tried different things and the results were not very good.
-Some of the models have only photosets while others have only videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Let me first say that I got access to this site through my teens analyzed membership and I am glad that I didn't actually fork any money over for this unimpressive site.
*Here are the things they do right. They have a wide selection of mostly teen models that should please most peoples taste. The bulk of the content is solo teasing with a very nice mix of clothed to all nude with an emphasis on showing the entire body rather than concentrating on just a few parts. Some of the models have more than one set or video so that can be great if she is one of your favorites.
*Here are the things they do wrong. Most of the models only have one or two phototsets and/or videos so unless you luck in then you are not going to get much out of this site. Part of the content is leased material and quite old now. Renaming models is so annoying because it makes finding their more common name much harder.
**The bottom line is that this is a very poor stand alone site even for the most ardent fan of softcore porn and this is made worse by the fact that it's pretty old and contains some leased material.
**I can't recommend to anyone unless the content from the other sites you get appeals to you and my score is based on that reason. |
|
01-20-13 09:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
Bang My Teen Ass
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have some cute Eastern European models.
+Part of their content is exclusif.
+Videos can be dowloaded in 1280x720 resolution. |
| Cons: |
-Site is tiny with only 32 videos and not really updating with new content.
-The content is dated but they must change the date on a regular basis because the oldest scenes is dated in 2012 but the site has been active since 2009.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on amny other sites.
-They have a search option but since they don't have tags or do not name any of the models so I'm not sure what you would search.
-The site is cluttered with third party advertising and there's no way to escape it no matter on which page you are. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got access to this site with my teen analyzed membership and am I glad I did because this was always a site on my possible join list and I would have been royally pissed if i had paid any amount for this unimpressive site.
*This is not a very good site but they do have some nice videos and the girls are all pretty cute. of course you probably already have them if you are member of Eastern European pon sites but even if you don't then you probably have a similar scene with the same girl.
**There is very little to recommend this site. If you like the girls on the preview section than join TMW and you will probably get the same videos or very similar for less money and better quality.** |
|
01-16-13 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and is from a niche that is not really represented.
+They add one new scene a week and all content is dated.
+You can view material online.
+You can download the videos in both WMV and MP4 and each versions is offered in normal resolution as well as HD.
+They have a very nice selection of models to choose from and they have started to add some Europeans to the mix.
+Membership to one site gives you discount on the other sites.
***Current membership also gives you access to bound gangbang*** |
| Cons: |
-I'm going to put this in the con because it's important that people be aware that this is an intense site and the content is definetely not for everyone.
-The site is quite tiny with only 14 scenes. You do get access to BGB(that adds another 35 scenes) but I don't know if that is going to change in the near futur or if maybe they will incorporate some or all of the content into this one. Clearly they don't need two sites with almost identical content.
-There are pics but this is primarily a video only site so they aren't really worth talking about.
-This is a small con but two of the performers on this site have done scenes for BGB so you aren't really getting much of anything new. |
| Bottom Line: |
*If you know Kink then you have a good idea of their business practices. If you don't then it's important to know that they take the well being of their performers to heart so although the shoots are quite intense. At no time is the girls in any danger to their health. The before and after interview makes that quite obvious.
*I'm going to stay on the fence for now and say that the content has potential. I sort of like the idea behind the site and the women do appear to really be into it but this is still forceable gangbangs so there is play acting done from all the players and it can be a little disturbing. That's why I don't know if I will join as often as I might for some of their other sites because I think they are too intense for my taste. The slapping, chocking and spitting are not my cup of tea and sadly most of these are in all of their shoots. I don't care if the performer is okay with any of these things because I'm not and I'm the one paying.
*I also can't help but feel that the scenarios get close to rape and that is a little hard for me to enjoy even though it's all fake. Mind you BGB wasn't much different than this one but it sometimes felt a little less intense.
**This site will appeal to anyone who enjoyed bound gangbang or was interested in joining that site. I would highly recommend that anyone who prefers more passion filled porn avoid this site because there is none of that here.**
***The score has less to do with my feelings in regards to the content and more to do with the site's potential. I may not have enjoyed myself as much as I could have but that doesn't mean that they don't do an excellent job producing the videos.*** |
|
01-13-13 11:04am
Replies (6)
|
Review
60
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to over 127 movies or 620 scenes.
+All the content is dated.
+They appear to update with one new scene every 2 days or so.
+All the videos can be downloaded in at least 640x480 resolution but at least 150 of them can also be downloaded in 1080p.
+You can view all the pics online and they offer 3 possible rseolution: 1024x680, 1280x852 and 1600x1060.
+You can download all the photosets in a single zip file and they aoffer the same resolution as the online versions.
+Jules used to be able to get some of the top women in porn to do a lot more hardcore stuff than they had previoulsy done.
+All the scenes have multiple tags and it's possible to do a search by keyword. |
| Cons: |
-A percentage of the content is not exclusif.
-Jules decided to start another site sometime after this one so part of the content that should have come to this site is on the new one.
-They don't release all the scenes from a movie even though that movie is on the site.
-It's hard to tell whether the site will update using newer movies or if he's going to use older stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is the best site for any fan of Jules Jordan movies or at least the younger version ofJules as a lot of the movies are a couple of years to many years old. Mind you that's actually a huge advantage since I find that his earlier stuff is far superor to what he tends to relesae these days. Hopefully he will keep adding new content from his older movies rather than the newer stuff or at least a mix of bothe.
*Now if you aren't familair with Jules then he's is on a very short list of directors able to get top stars to do some pretty hardcore stuff. He has always been known for gonzo porn and anal is common in his movies(at least the early ones). He cares that the women appearing in his movies look both beautiful and desirable. To that end. He'll usually make sure that they wear appropriate makeup and that their hair is well done. He will then spend a large amount of time shooting the girls from a wide variety of angles so that we get to enjoy her beauty. There is rarely any transition in his movies so girls are first oggeld and then they meet the guy or guys and the sex begins.
*If what I described above appeals to you then you have to join this site at least once. Of course if it doesn't then you should avoid it. Be advised that he's not into lesbian porn so anyone looking for this type of content from him should also avoid the site because it doesn't really exist. |
|
01-07-13 06:55pm
Replies (12)
|
Review
61
|
60 Plus MILFs
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content that is rare to see on the net and even more so when you consider that it stars North American women.
+The sex is surprisingly good considering the age of the performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to still be updating.
+Many of the performers look good for their age and seem to still be all natural. Not too mention that they appear to be mostly unknowns.
+You can see the age of each performer in the photo section of the site.
+You can download the photosets of each video as a single zip file and resolution is minimum 1200x800(but many of the pics are 1600x1063).
+You also get access to 50plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-This site like it's sister site 50plus does not allow members to download videos that are older than 6 weeks.
-The site is quite tiny with only 72 videos and they don't update regularly or with any kind of schedule so that number does not grow by much each year.
-Many of their performers have more than one video on this site and on 50 plus so you are getting some similar content.
-Since these women are in their 60's then they don't look like women under 40 or let alone under 30. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I debated whether I should do a seperate review of this site or simply add the info on my 50plus review since the transition from both site is seemless to members but I decided to do a seperate one just in case Score decides to split the sites. This way each site will have it's own review and that is important because this site is so much smaller than the olther one.
*The thing to know about this site is that it's women in their 60's having hardcore sex with men that are definetely half their age or younger and don't let the gray ins ome of their hair fool you because they can give as good as they take. Sadly the site also doesn't have any kissing between the performers which is too bad because that would add a lot more passion and heat to the scenes.
*They don't allow downloads other than those released in the last six weeks but because they don't update as often as their 50plus site then you actually get less for your money.
**Bottom line is that there are almost no sites that cater to this type of fetish so even though it's mostly a streaming only site then it could be worth joining at least once to see what it offers and since you get access to 50plus milfs then that's not a bad deal. Of course if they seperate both sites then it will probably take years before they have enough content to make a visit worth it. that is unless more 60 years old start doing porn.** |
|
12-27-12 06:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.
*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.
*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.
**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway. |
|
12-27-12 08:14am
Replies (4)
|
Review
63
|
Jim Slip
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+All exclusif content.
+All content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+They started to offer videos in a single file rather than in small clips in 2009. That's about 175 videos out of 469.
+The 185 newer videos are offered in at least 720x408 resolution and they also offer them in 1280x720.
+All the photosets since October 2009 are now offered with a resolution of 2000x1343.
+They hire a good selection of models from most European Countries.
+They now offer Lara latex site with your membership.
+The addition of Lara's site means that you get some lesbian content as well as b/g. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest problem with this site is that they have never considered remastering their older content to at least offer the videos in a single file format rather than in multiple clips.
-Although you now get Lara's site. She does not update very often and the total number of scenes is only 32.
-The performers are only Jim and Lara so you may get tired of seeing only them in the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this site because they still put out decent suff and I keep hoping that they will remaster their older content. Until they do that then the site will always suffer a lower score than it could get if theyr tried to make some changes. The good news is that you now also get Lara's site included with your membership and that's not bad. Lara is Jim's wife and the person responsible for shooting his scenes in the same way that he's responsible for shooting her's. I wish she would update more often because she is a good performer and she does add some lesbian content which is always nice.
*The site hasn't done any changes since my last review (except adding Lara's site) so I can't really add more info than what's on my previous review. I will only say that Jim is geting older while the models he hires remain at about the same so you are getting an older man with young girls. I guess the same can be said for Lara except that she tends to go for older males and females over younger ones.
I've added a couple of points to my previous score because of the addition of Lara's site. |
|
12-23-12 05:47pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
64
|
Mom POV
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Many of their models are true unknowns not seen on any other sites.
+They have an excellent mix of models and
+They update with one new video per week.
+All videos can be downloaded in MP4 with a 720x480 resolution.
+Most of the scenes are suprisignly well shot and the sex is often quite good.
+The site is about 2 years old and already has 108 videos.
+A decent percentage of thse milfs do anal.
+You can stream videos in 518x288, 720x405 and 1024x576. |
| Cons: |
-The title of the site makes it clear that you are only going to get POV shots.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then selecting one of the model on that page.
-The content is dated but you have to use a very convoluted way to know the date.
-There is also a scene description but you again have to find that in a convoluted way.
-There are absolutely no pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm pretty sure the people who own and operate girlsdoporn are also responsible for this site. Everything from the site design to the interview to filming style is identical in every aspect except that the guy who shoots for this site seems to know a lot more on how to use a camera than the guy who shoots for girldoporn. Now it is possible that it's the same guy but he does a far superior here than on the other site.
*Here are the important things you need to ask yourself to see if this is the kind of site you would enjoy.
1-Do you like older women(they have some 30years old but most of the women are in their 40's, 50's and even in their 60's.
2-Is body art a problem. Not all the models have ink but a large enough group does that if you have to have all natural then you may want to avoid.
3-Is POV shot porn a negative then avoid since it's all POV. I actually didn't mind it too much and I known for not liking POV.
4-Do you have to have HD content. They don't and even if it's available then I suspect that they do like GDP and make it available only to members who stay with the site for multiple months.
You'll know if you will enjoy the site based on how you answered the above questions or at least on how flexible you are on some of them. I know that I enjoyed the site and have no problem recommending it but there's plenty of room for improvement.
*The first thing would be the addition of an actual camera guy to get different shots but I guess that will never happen since it would make the sites name redundant. They should make the features on the preview section available to the paying members. It would save people like me from opening two seperate pages so that you know what the action in the video will be.
**I did recognize a couple of models from this site on some of Scores sites so they are not all unknowns. |
|
12-09-12 04:58pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
65
|
VideosZ
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Over 12000 dvd's to choose from.
+They update with 35 new releases each week.
+All content is dated.
+You can view a percentage of their upcoming releases and the dates when they will be uploaded.
+They offer some studios not found on Videobox and they also have more movies from some studios available on Videobox.
-They have started to offer some dvd's in HD. |
| Cons: |
-A huge percentage of their library is also available on Videobox.
-Videosz may have more releases from one studio but in return VB will have more from another one.
-Download speeds are often quite slow which is deadly for a site with such a huge library.
-The same scene can be on more than one dvd since there are many third party studios.
-A large amount of the content is at least 5 years old and a lot is much older.
-For some strange reason they list some studios but don't actually carry any of their movies.
-They have the bulk of some studios content but they also only have a tiny portion of many other studios.
-A large percentage of their releases are not new movies but often older content.
-Video reolution is not the greatest. There are plenty of videos that are 480x360. Not bad on a competer monitor but watching this on a bigger screen is likely to be noty very fun. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This site is more or less identical to VB except that VB seems to be concentrating on releasing more recent movies while VidesZ is trying to bring bask ones. It does have it's share of more recent movies but I'd say that this is by far the smaller percentage than older titles. Now for some that is a bad thing but for others it's a great thing because some of the movies being offered byt VideosZ were all big hits at one time but have since stopped being produced for dvd so this is a great place to still get access to them. Even if the titles are still available on dvd then this is still a significantly cheaper place to get them than actually buying tons of dvd's.
*It would be nice to see better download options and also higher resolution on their videos.
*Their Paradise Films & Evil Playgrounds studios are great for people interested in Eastern European porn and who haven't yet joined a site like Teen Mega World because these studios get their content from the same source. Of course if you have joined that studios and similar ones than you may want to skip by the content from those studios because you probably already have it on one of your drives.
*The bottom line is that if you are looking to get access to certain studios that VB doesn't carry then you are obligated to join this site. I mean it's less than 20$ with the TBP/PU discount so it's a bargain that anyone should take. Just be aware that if you have to have HD content then this may no be the place to come because they only have about 650 titles that are HD. |
|
12-02-12 05:21am
Replies (7)
|
Review
66
|
Score Videos
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week. |
| Cons: |
-None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.
*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.
*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.
**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?** |
|
11-18-12 07:26am
Replies (3)
|
Review
67
|
Score HD
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have a loyalty program where you get access to one extra site each month that you remain a member.
+They truly have a wide variety of different body type models.
+A huge collection of older women models.
+Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV and basic resolution is 640x360.
+They also offer videos in the 1280x720 resolution.
+You can download all the photosets of each video in a single zip file and resolution is 1280x720.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with 6 new videos per week. |
| Cons: |
-There's a preview video that automatically starts each time you go to that videos download section.
-There are no tags on the videos so you actually have to search through each one to find what you are looking for.
-Many of the models may not be what you are into.
-They offer two extra sites with your membership but these aren't necessarily all that good.
**-It's possible to see what each model has on the other Score sites but since this is the only site where you can download all the content then that's not necessarily a good thing. |
| Bottom Line: |
**I got badly burned when I joined 40something because they implemented their policy of only allowing downloads of only their most recent updates after TBP had done their review so I was pleasantly surpried when I saw that this site offers almost every video I wanted from that site and a lot more. It's not perfect by far but you at least don't have any surpsise when you join this Score site.
*I'm pretty choosy about what I download and I still managed to find some amazing videos that were well worth the membership. The only warning I might give someone is that you should definetely check out all the models prior to joining because they do have a wide variety of models. You have some cute teens all the way to women in their late 40's and probably a couple in their 50's. There is also an abundance of BBW so if this is your thing than you'll have plenty to be happy about. On the downside. If you prefer women under the age of 30 and who are more on the slim side then this may not be your site of choice. Also anyone looking for more softcore or midcore stuff may want to steer clear as there is very little to be found here.
**The site could really use the addition of tags on their videos. It took me a long time to find what I wanted to download because I had to search through each model's video page. A nice search by keyword would really be appreciated by most members.
**It would also be really great if they offered the 50plus and 60plus content. As it is. You can see which models go on to shoot for those sites but yoiu have to join those sites knowing that only a tiny percentage of their content will be downloadable.
**They also don't necessarily add all of the content from their listed sites so while you do get a large amount. You don't get it all so it's very important to check this site's content before joining or you could be in for a surprise. |
|
11-10-12 11:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
68
|
Reality Kings
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Over 7500 scenes to chose from.
+They have an excellent mix of North American, South American and European performers.
+They have over 500 interacial scenes and over 1100 lesbian scenes.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search using keywords.
+All the videos from 2006 to now can be dowloaded in WMV and MP4 and the resolution is at least 768x432.
+All videos starting in late 2010 are now also available in MP4 1080p HD.
+They update with about 10 new videos per week and all content is dated
+The main pages aren't clutered with a lot of third party advertising. |
| Cons: |
-The most annoying thing about this site is that you only see the performers full name on the main page. So if you do a search by keyword then all you see is the models first name which isn't always correctly spelled.
-They do a lot of scenario porn but a lot of it is not as well done as it I'd like it to be.
-The content from sometime in 2004 and before is only available in multiple clips.
-The resolution for most of the videos may be 768x432 but the quality for the videos made from 2008 and before is average at best.
-Their preview section is one of the worst one for this type of site. |
| Bottom Line: |
**This is the top rated reality porn site and I can see why it is. They try to hit almost every type of porn and they to do a pretty decent job with most of them. They have a few faults but these are rather minor and are probably not much of an issue for most people.
*If you have been a member of Naughty America, Mofos, Brazzer or bangbros than you know what to expect since tese guys offer about the same type of content. The most obvious difference seems to be in the selection of models. Most sites prefer to stick with models from one or two Countries but these guys try to cover the whole world. They have over 900 scenes with European models, 350 scenes with Brazilian models and so many more with American models of different nationality. The only ethnic group not really represented are Asians.
*Their choice of models is a slight problem for me because I'm not generally a fan of Brazilain models or Brazilian porn so that's 350 less porn scene for me. Then there are the 900 Europeans scenes. They are for the most part good but I've been a member of so many great European sites that I already have many similar scenes starring these same girls so that means that I didn't really bother downloading most of their videos.
*The only thing that I wouldn't mind seeing is an improvement in the acting for the scenario driven scenes. The other sites do a much better job. The other improvment is in making sure that the models full name is visble on every screen so that you don't have to check out a different page to see if it's the correct model.
**If you have tried the other sites like this one then you have to try this one because there is so much content that you are bound to get your money's worth. |
|
10-25-12 06:29pm
Replies (11)
|
Review
69
|
Whipped Ass
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have over 1900 scenes to choose from.
+They manage to hire some really hot models all through the years and get them to do some intense BSDM.
+They update with one new scene each week.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the mp4 format with a resolution of
+All the videos from 2007 to now are offered in HD with the mp4 and WMV format.
+There is a calendar where you can view the upcoming shoots for all their sites.
+A membership to one site gives you discounts to the other Kink sites. |
| Cons: |
-I think my biggest issue with this site is that the BSDM is sometimes a little too intense for my taste.
-There are some doms that aren't as good as others or the chemistry between them and the sub is just not there and that tends to ruin the scene.
-They have some pics but they do such a poor job with them that they are almost worthless and you can't download the entire photoset into a single file because they split the sets in 3 or more parts.
-The quality of the videos for their eartly stuff ison the poor side of things. That's most of the stuff prior to 2006 |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a Kink site so if you have been a member of any of their other sites then you know that these guys take their porn seriously and try to offer the best porn possible. That's probably why they are still dishing out top quality porn and able to hire the top girls. Even in these hard economic times and in the era of tube sites.
*This site is designed for people who like g/g porn but with the bsdm aspect added to it. The level of bsdm varies from video to video so it's hard to say just how intense it is but it feels like it has gotten a liitle more intense in recent months. Of course that could be because the performers being hired are more into it so the dom will give her sub a lot more then she might some a newbie.
*Anal penetration is common in many of the videos so that's something to consider if you aren't into that. There is some fisting but it is on the rare side so it shouldn't be an issue for most people.
**I tend to join about once every year or so but I would probably join more often if the level of bsdm was not as high as it is. My tolerance for it is rather low so more sex and less whipping would be great.
***The only people that should avoid this site are those that don't know what the words dom and sub mean or don't like bsdm. |
|
10-20-12 06:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
70
|
Naughty America
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There are over 5000 scene to choose from.
+They have a great mix of mostly US performers from teens to women of varying ages.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search by keywords.
+You can stream the videos online.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV and they started to offer the Quicktime version sometime in 2007. Video resolution from 2007 and onward is at least 720x400.
+Videos from 2009 to today are now also offered in two HD format: 720p and 1080p.
+You can view or download the photosets that accompany each scene.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with about a dozen new scenes per week. |
| Cons: |
-They actually have two real time feeds for cam sites running on a couple of their main pages.
-They have two side tabs on the right of the screen that have to be closed each time you change pages and although not that big. they are still a distraction.
-I didn't see a method to scroll back through their library so that you can see all their content. The only way you can view content past two months is if you use the porn finder option and select a tag word. Of course if the scene was not proprerrly tagged then you willnever find it.
-Using the back button to return to your previous page wil always bring you back to the first page no matter on what page you were.
-The site is clutered with advertising for their own sites or for third party stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
***The 5$ join price was impossible to pass up. Especially for fans of sites like Brazzer, Bangbros and Reality King. There are some variations in the sites but they all pretty much offer the same type of content and they tend to also hire the same performers. This site may be a litttle more geared toward the couples market or at least people interested in scenario driven kind of porn. Now just because it might be more couple friendly does not mean that the sex isn't hot and raunchy because it is.
**If anyone saw my exchange with a webmaster on a recent review in regards to live feeds of cam sites then you can imagine that this site lost a lot more points because they actually have two of these. I'm sorry that sites feel the need to do that to make money but if they must then the least they can do is make sure that it is in a section that must be selected and not on the main pages of the site.
**There is a lot of advertising clutering the site and this takes up a lot of screen space. You even have to close one pop up and skip over an advertising page each time you log in.
**The bottom line is that for 5$ or even the normal 10$. You will more than get your moneys worth and even the annoying advertising and the stupid live feeds shouldn't be such a problem.
***My score would have been in the 90's if it wasn't for the live feeds.*** |
|
10-13-12 11:42am
Replies (6)
|
Review
71
|
DogFart
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The best interracial porn site on the net.
+You get a total of 22 sites.
+You can download the videos in wmv format and they have started to offer them in the MP4 format as well. The resolution is at least 640x480 but you now have a large amount of content being offered in 768x432 and even in HD.
+You can stream all the videos online.
+They remastered most of their older content so that you can now get them in the MP4and WMV format and in a higher resolution.
+All content is dated and they update with new content once a week.
+They have 2 sites dedicated to the gay male market.
+Many of the sites offer scenario driven porn.
+They hire some esxcellent performers and there is no lack of hardcore here.
+They advertised the upcoming updates 2 weeks in advance. |
| Cons: |
-Only about 6-7 sites are really updating with brand new content. All of the others seem to offer remastered scenes or might be rotating their older content.
-Some of the sites are meant for a very pecific market so unless you're into that type of fetish then you won't be saving their content.
-They do seem to enjoy facials, blowbangs so if you aren't a fan then that may be a problem.
-It would be nice if they added a black female to white male site.
-They do not tag their scenes so you have to read the synopsis to find out what's happening.
-There is no real search options except name of the model.
-It would be nice if they could drop their price to 30$. |
| Bottom Line: |
**This is the best interracial porn network on the net and if I'm not mistaken, then the only one still updating with new content. If you like to see white women having hardcore sex with well hung black men then this is the place to come. They manage to get some very well known performers to appear on this site and they even get many of them to do anal which is impressive when you consider the size of the equipment some of these guys have.
**I was planning on joining the newtork sometime this year but I got a special offer to join for 20$ so it was a no brainer. I normally join about twice a year mostly because the network is 35$ and they only update about once or twice a month with the kind of porn that I like.
**Aside from maybe adding tags to their scenes and then revamping their search engine too help members find a specific fetish then I can't see anything else they need to do to improve the network.
**The one thing that I'd love to see but I asked and it doesn't seem to be possible in todays porn world is a site like Spring Thomas or Katie Thomas. THose were really great sites because they were dedicated to really cute teens girls having a variety of sexual encounters with black men. The great thing is that these women were mostly known for the stuff they did on their site and didn't do much on other sites or in movies and in the case of Spring. She never appeared elsewhere except here.
**Anyone who doesn't like interracial porn should avoid this network because this is the only type of porn you will find here. |
|
10-11-12 11:00am
Replies (6)
|
Review
72
|
Caballero Classics
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
10-08-12 06:20pm (Update History)
Reason: I added some info as to why i can't download content and i dropped my score
|
| Pros: |
+Access to 10 other sites.
+The ability to stream videos online in a flash player.
+You can download the videos in two different H264 format with 640x480 resolution being the best available.
+Video quality is not that bad when you consider that most of the content is 20 or more years old.
+You get access to some movies not easily found on the net. |
| Cons: |
Where to begin?
-The first thing you notice upon entering this site and most of the other sites is that there is a flash player located in the top middle part of the screen which is showing a model currently appearing on one of their cam sites and there is no way to turn that off. That means that I'm wasting my valuable alloted download quota on crap that I don't want. They seem to rotate through different active models in the hope, I guess, of attracting enough customers so that the model can start a private show. |
| Bottom Line: |
cons continued:
-The second thing you notice is that no matter where you happen to be in regards to the movie. If you use your back button (which you must) then you are always brought back to the main page. Now the site haseither 134 pages or 201 depending on which section you are(don't ask me I don't know why) but you can only see 13 of those pages identified on the screen. You have to scroll from left to right depending on hwere you want to go. That's a pisser when you are on page 65 and you use the back button and wind one on page 1
-The third thing you notice is the tags on each scene/movie is so bad that it's more a problem than anythign else.
-The fouth thing you notice is that to get to the download section. You have to go through the streaming section first so every time you pick a scene then you have to stop the flash player from loading the video prior to geting on the download section or the video will stream while you are dowloading.
-The fifth thing you notice is that there are many duplicate tiles on the site so the total number of actual movies is a lot less than advertised and I noticed that not every scene from the movies is available.
-The sixth thing you notice is that pretty much every other site in the network has all of the above problems and they all basically share the same content so why even offer other sites?
-The seventh thing you notice (at least I did) is that this content is in part or all available to anyone with a membership to one of Manwin's site. Look in their bonus Content section and you will see that the design is very similar to this one. Of course finding something will be a lot hard but you'd save yourself 20$.
**I'm adding this last one because it happened to me and I've yet to get it resolved. About a week in to me membership. I lost the ability to stream or download videos and I nstill haven't been able to correct that problem after two days. It could be my system but if it is then why is it that I could do all those things in the morning and I couldn't in the evening?
****I finally got my answer and the reason why I can't stream or download content is because I've reached my quota for the month so I will not be able to stream or download anymore from any of the sites. I didn't do the exact math but I gather that I downloaded between 10 and 15 Gigs of data. No clue as to how much I streamed but it can't have been much since I was only interested in downloading the videos to watch at a later date.***I
***Bottom line is that I wish I could recommend this network because I wanted it to be good but It isn't and I don't think it ever will. The people responsible for these sites don't seem to care about putting a decent product. |
|
10-07-12 01:22pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
73
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Huge network of sites catering to fans of young Eastern European models.
+More than 2800 videos and photosets to choose from.
+You can stream all videos online or you can download them in a variety of format from WMV, FLV and MKV .
+They added High Definition videos in 2011 so you have about 300 or more HD videos.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file and resolution is 960x1440.
+All content is dated and they appear to add one new scene every 2 days.
+The members section is well designed and it's easy to find scenes using tag words, site name or the model's name.
+The TBP/PU discount of 19.95$ is amazing. |
| Cons: |
-I find that a large percentage of the content added in the last 4 months is subpar to what TMW used to offer.
-The vast majority of the sites are dead so content is either months old or more likely years old. The only sites that seem to still be adding new content are Teen Sex Movs, Teen Sex Mania, Creampie Angel and Anal Angel.
-They keep adding new sites to the network but this isn't a positive thing because the content on those sites can be quite good so having only a few scenes and then none drives me crazy.
-They have significantly dropped the number of anal scenes since June.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on many other sites.
-They have advertising for other sites on all their pages. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Let me first say that a lot of what I'm about to write amy be negative but only for returning members and not for anyone just joining this network. Anyone just joining this network will more than get his money's worth. If you're a past member and want to join again then please pay attention to the following information prior to doing so. I was last a member in July of this year and even at that time. I was finding that some of the newer content was not all that good. You can imagine my surprise when I joined again last week and found that now almost all the content is like that.
*The first thing you should know is that if you are into anal then you will want to avoid the network for any new anal scenes. I did the math and they only added 19 anal scenes between June and September while they added 38 anal scenes between Feb and May. Those numbers are a lot worse when you consider that they only added 2 anals since July 21. Anal isn't for everybody so hearing that TMW replaced those anal scenes with standard b/g scenes should be great news but many of the scenes that replaced those anal ones tend to often be badly shot, not well lit, and the action is not very hot. also I'm not so sure that the content is as recent as it could be. The most obvious reason for me saying that is that the latest update dated Oct 5 for their anal-angels site is a scene that was released in March of this year on another site. The girl is cute as always but the scene is not well shot and it's frankly not very good.
*I don't know if I'm correct but my gut feeling is that the syphilis outbreak which hit Europe really hard coupled with Russia pretty much banning production of porn in that Country have significantly affected the ability of TMW to offer a higher quality product. I checked and many of the girls that have appeared on TMW are from Russia so that can't be good for business. The economy still being where it is must also be a huge factor and then you still have content thieves. I think TMW had very little already for release and when they started to run out of scenes then they started looking for content providers that had some unreleased material or had decent prices on already relased stuff and that's what you are now seeing.
*I don't know what the futur holds for this network. I hope they turn things around because it was a great network. All I know is that I won't be returing again until I see serious chnages in their content. of course that is going to be hard since their brand new site is just as bad as their old one so no way of knowing what is new on the network.
**My score is based solely on the fact that I'm a returning member who doesn't like their new stuff. Otherwise the score would be in the 90's. |
|
10-06-12 10:04pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
74
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Access to 579 titles which I believe is close to the entire Wicked libray.
+Content is dated and they update with one new movie each week..
+All the videos can be streamed online.
+All the videos are offered in the mp4 for download with 640x480 resolution for all them, while over 200 of the most recent titles are now also offered with 720p resolution and the last 40+ titltes are also offered in 1080p.
+Unilke most sites like this. You can actually download the entire movie rather than just the scenes. Resolution is the same as the scenes.
+Each movie/scene has multiple tags attached to it and it's possible to search using tags words.
+You catch for free all the Wicked live shows.
+You have access to some bonus content live BTS and award show stuff.
+You also stream over 3000 pages of videos in the bonus section(see con).
+the TBP discount is sweet. |
| Cons: |
-I don't know if it's recent but the site often stopped working for no apparent reason which requiried me to log back in.
-Advertising tends to take about 1/5 of all the pages and it's a lot more on certain pages.
-Load times to stream videos is a little long sometime.
-You get access to some camgirls but the good stuff requires that you pay for it so is it really worth it?
-There are over 3000 pages of bonus videos that you can view online but the tags are all wrong, you always get an error message going from one page to the next and quality is not very good on most videos.
*-I'm putting this in the con only because some people are rabid about condoms so be warned that Wicked is a condom company going back a long time.* |
| Bottom Line: |
**Ihave been a fan of Wicked since the 90's so it's a little strange that I never thought of joining their site until now. I don't mind condoms and I prefer a story with my porn and this is basically what Wicked does. I suspect that they try to target more the couples market than the gonzo one but that doesn't mean that there isn't any heat in their scenes because there is. They also have a certain number of contract stars so if you are a fan of these ladies then you are almost obligated to join this site because most of them haven't done much except for work for Wicked.
**I was pleasantly surprised to see a studio site offer the majority of their library and even more so to see that you can actually download the entire movie and not just the individual sex scenes. I was happy to see that the video quality on the older title is quite decent. Resolution is only 640x480 but seeing as these movies were never filmed in HD then trying to convert into a higer resolution would probably be a really bad idea.
**My only major issue with the site is that it kept on stopping to work and you had to log back in and find the page you were on. The other one is in regards to the bonus videos. If you are going to bother and put some bonus videos then why not make sure the system works. Otherwise it's usueless filler that slows down the servers.
***The only people that should avoid this site are those looking for pure gonzo porn and those who can't watch porn that has condoms in it.*** |
|
09-30-12 10:32am
Replies (15)
|
Review
75
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to 369 dvd's which comes out to 2017 scenes.
+All videos can be streamed online.
+All videos can be downloaded in H264 format and resolution is at least 720x408.
+The 160 most recent dvd's are now also offered with 1280x720HD and 1960x1280HD resolution.
+Content is dated and they update with one new dvd per week.
+They have multiple tags for each scene and they have a search option for those keywords.
+They offer 51 BTS videos.
+They offer some live shows(I'm not a fan so I won't comment beyond this). |
| Cons: |
-Although 369 dvd's isn't bad. This is still a tiny portion of the Elegant Angel library. I don't think you get access to any movie done prior to 2008.
-Only one dvd update per week is poor.
-The preview sections says that some dvd's are in the members section but you find out after joining that this is a lie.
-They offer photosets of some of their performers but the number of pics in each set is less than a dozen. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I was a little disapointed when I first joined this site because i was hoping to get access to a couple of their newer movies which are clearly on the preview section and the option: clicking on the button to watch these movies brings you up to the sign up page so you would expect that the movies would be available inside the members section and that's where you would be wrong. That's not to say that I'm not pleased with my membership because I am. Evil Angel and Elegant Angel are two studios whose films I have always enjoyed. Getting access to only a part of their library for 20$ is a huge bargain for anyone and something that no one should pass up.
*I can't help but feel that Elegant suffers a little or a lot depending on how you look at things from the fact that I've been a member of Evil Angel a couple of times before and that site is superior to this one on a few levels. The total amount of content is greater at Evil and they update more often. The update schedule is significantly better at Evil because you get access to their newer movies a lot faster than you do here. The library goes further back at Evil than at Elegant. You get some better pics at Evil and you have a greater variewty of download options.
*If you know the kind of porn Elegant Angel puts out and it's the kind you like then you have to join this site because you will be happy with what you get. Just don't rely on what the preview sections says about new content on their first page because it may not be available when you join.
**The only people that should avoid this site are those looking for Elegant's older titles. You won't find any here and that is too bad because they have some really great older movies. |
|
09-24-12 05:36am
Replies (14)
|
