Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of my favorite glamcore sites.
-The selection of models is outstanding. Most of the models are either attractive or gorgeous.
The photography and videos focus on making the models as attractive as possible, and it really shows.
-Easy login. Username and password can be saved. No captcha required.
-Good site design. Can search site by updates, models, or videos.
-Large thumbnails clearly show what the models look like, what models are in each video or photoset.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Content has date posted to site.
-No download limits.
-Fast download speeds. I get over 2.1 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Download manager works. I use DownThemAll.
-Videos and photo sets are professionally shot. Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control (no random extraneous noises), most of the photos and videos are well-focused.
-Good update rate. Last couple of weeks, they have been adding one video or photoset per day.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is one of the best glamcore sites available. I'm basing that on the quality of the models (attractive to absolutely gorgeous), the high quality of the videos and photosets, how easy the site is to use).
-No search function if want to search by type of sex action, hair color of model, breast size, or other factors.
-If you don't like glamcore (some PU members call this heartcore), you won't like this site. There is no gonzo sex, no rough treatment of women.
-Many of the videos have brief moments where the video is slighty blurry. This is an "artistic effect", which I find stupid and annoying. I want my videos crystal clear, not crystal clear, with occasional blurry shots mixed in.
-Glamcore usually has soft "mood music" in the background. I prefer a video without any "mood music" or any background music.
-Models are white, late teens to early 20s. Some PU members might want a wider variety of models, different races, more of an age spread.
Bottom Line:
This is one of the best glamcore sites on the Internet. The models range from merely attractive to drop-dead gorgeous. The videos and photosets are high quality, professionally shot, to emphasize the beauty of the models. The sex is slow, sensuous, romantic.
There is a mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl. There are a few with 2 boys-1 girl, 1 boy-2 girls, 2 boys-2 girls.
I believe the site contents are exclusive. Although many of the models can be found at other sites, the videos and photosets at the site are exclusive.
There is a nice amount of content. The site has been around a number of years (2009 or earlier?). It used to be called "Beauty is Divine". When it first started, it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. I don't believe it had any videos, only photosets. Each photoset had a small number of photos, and the models were uniformly lovely. The photography was high quality. Then the site name was changed to X-Art, and they started adding videos, and changing the approach from softcore to erotic glamor, which slowly evolved to glamcore, where the photosets and videos show actual sex.
Photosets can be viewed online, or downloaded.
Photosets from the last few years have about 100+ photos per set.
The earliest photosets had 25 or fewer photos per set.
Download options include a zip file in three definitions:
1200 pixels
2000 pixels
4000 pixels
Videos can be streamed online or downloaded.
Download options have choice of many definitions:
The download choices for one recent video include:
MP4 (all devices and mobile)
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
Apple Quicktime
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
Windows Media
1920x1080 HD (1478 MB)
1280x720 HD (867 MB)
960x540 SD (589 MB)
640x360 SD (158 MB)
BOTTOM LINE:
If you like tender young teens, in gorgeously photographed photos and videos, then this site is worth visiting.
As I said, this is one of my favorite glamcore teen sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits that I found. The first day, I downloaded 12 high-definition photosets and videos with no problem. The TBP review states
there is a download limit, but I didn't find one.
-Outstanding quality in the photosets and videos.
-High percentage of lovely or attractive teen and early-twenty models.
-One month discounted price of $19.95 with PU discount.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-The models are presented attractively.
-Some truly outstanding, lovely girls.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Updates 3 times a week.
-A behind the scenes blog can be interesting.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works fine at this site.
-Model listing. Single page, with nice sized thumbnails to show each model, makes it easy to search through the models.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-There is a model bio. Gives name, country, age, a few personal facts.
-Good sound control. Apart from the unnecessary passages where they have a music background.
-The content is mainly exclusive, as far as I can tell. I did see one video that was also posted at beauty-angels, part of the Teen Mega World network: model Sasha D, video titled "Between the Sheets", is the same video posted at beauty-angels titled "Melika". The model is named Melika
at beauty-angels, and the video is also named "Melika". But the X-Art site offers more download formats than the beauty-angels site, as well as
offering higher definition versions of the video. Teen Mega World gives nice choices for video definitions, but X-Art gives high-end video definitions.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
CONS:
-The cons are basically minor. This is an outstanding site for erotic teens.
-If you want gonzo or rough sex, look elsewhere.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-The soundtrack could be better. They play a music background on the introduction of the videos, and it would be better to have no music.
-Also, in the introduction of some videos, they try to add artistic touches. So instead of giving you a crystal sharp video image, the image goes in and out of focus, which is annoying. I want to see the girl clearly, not a bunch of out-of-focus images.
-Sometimes, you're in the member's area, you click on a hot link to see a video or photoset, and you are transferred to the preview section for non-members; so you have to log back in to the member's area, and try again to download the video or photoset.
-There are a few errors in labelling their hot links. For example, the site offers 3 hot links to download the photoset of Izabella Carr titled
"Red Velvet Goddess". You are supposed to have 3 choices of 1200 p, 2000 p, and 4000 p. But the 2000 p and 4000 p links both download photos of
2000 p. There is no 4000 p photoset.
BOTTOM LINE
-Sample statistics:
-Video
Runtime for video: 12 minutes 24 seconds
Windows Media
1920x1080 HD (783 MB) bitrate 8658 kbps
1280x720 HD (466 MB) bitrate 5144 kbps
960x540 SD (285 MB) bitrate 3136 kbps
Apple Quicktime
1920x1080 HD (755 MB)
1280x720 SD (447 MB)
960x540 SD (272 MB)
iPad/iPod/Mobile
640x480 SD (65 MB)
-Photoset
Images in this photoset: 84
1200 pixels (16 MB)
2000 pixels (29 MB)
4000 pixels (88 MB)
Number of models: 100+
Number of videos: 180+
Number of photosets: 400+
Theme is erotic softcore and hardcore. Site started out years ago as a softcore photo site of beautiful young models, girls in their teens and
early twenties. The photosets were small, but nicely photographed. No videos, photos only, girls only, no actual sex.
Then, a few years ago, they started adding sex in their photosets. And started adding videos. They now offer high quality photosets and videos of solo female masturbation, girl-girl lesbian sex, boy-girl sex. The sex is sensual or erotic, not gonzo.
The site is well designed, making it easy to navigate.
You don't get the massive quantity of a mega site/network like Nubiles or Teen Mega World, but if you like the sensual, erotic approach, this site is well worth visiting.
Videos can be streaming or downloaded.
Download options include: wmv, mov, and mp4 format.
Download resolutions may include: 960x540, 1280x720, and 1920x1080.
But on a 15 inch laptop monitor, even the lower definition 540p videos look good.
The videos are short, mostly from 6 to 12 minutes. A few videos can hit 18
minutes. The quality is so high, you wish they were longer. You get good professional camera work, good lighting, good colors. The newer videos are being offered in 1080 HD, with bitrates of 8500 kbps or higher.
The photosets are high quality, as well. The number of photos per set varies widely, from 1 to 70 or more. The girls are so gorgeous, you wish there were more photos in each set, especially the sets from 5 years ago or more, because the early photosets had 30 photos or less, of lovely young models.
The girls are young (18 to 21), Caucasian, slender. Very little variety in the models. But they range from attractive, to fucking beautiful.
-The "Behind the Scenes" section gives a glimpse of how the photosets and videos are shot, also gives a little bit of the personality of some models.
The site advertises itself as "Premium Quality HD Erotic Videos and Photography." I think that's an accurate description.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-XXX Shades is part of the LetsDoeIt network. The site and network feature attractive European models in glamcore settings.
-As part of the LetsDoeIt network, you get access to over 40 different sites. The sites are mainly glamcore, and the models are not just attractive, but are presented with special care to appear like movie stars.
-You stream and/or download the videos in a variety of definitions: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Login and member pages are https. So the pages are secure from hacking.
-There is a hot link in each video that lets you skip the intro of the video (which is advertising for the site).
-You have a model index, a network site index, and a search function.
The model index has nice-sized thumbnails for each model.
-The videos at the site and network are exclusive. Except that you can find many of them on tube sites, so the idea of exclusive no longer means what it used to mean.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Standard for porn sites, unfortunately.
-Each video comes with a tiny photoset (6 to 15 photos per set). The models deserve a full photoset of at least 50 to 100 photos per set.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
-But since the photosets are so tiny, they are hardly worth collecting. Except as a visual reminder of what the videos are like.
-It's a small site (only 146 videos currently), so you can manually examine the entire site.
Bottom Line:
The videos are a mix of glamcore in a variety of niches: blowjobs, lesbian, boy-girl, etc.
The site title refers to the novels and films in the 50 Shades of Grey series.
So the site videos feature erotic romantic videos.
The production values are high, and the models are uniformly attractive to gorgeous.
The videos feature boy-girl, girl-girl, threesomes. The 50 Shades of Grey series featured a slightly harder BDSM flavor than the videos at XXX Shades site: the models (male and female) wear nice costumes or underwear, but there is very little BDSM in the videos: the action is more heartcore, where the male tries to pleasure the female with sex, instead of inflicting pain to arouse her. So there's lots of kissing, stroking, cunnilingus, blowjob, vaginal fucking.
There is one video titled "50 Shades Of Submission", which is based on the 50 Shades of Grey series, where the model, Arya Fae, plays a submissive who is mouth-fucked, spanked, choked, fucked strongly, which is the closest the site comes to the 50 Shades of Grey movies.
The video titled "Freaky Threeway" is a hoot.
It features a man, a cute girlfriend, and a sex doll.
The man bugs his girlfriend that he wants a threeway sex, but the girlfriend is jealous and doesn't want to share. So then she comes up with the idea of giving her boyfriend three-way sex, but with a blonde sex doll, instead of a live person.
The boyfriend seems overjoyed, and a bit slow, because he's banging away on the sex doll, saying how great it is, until he tries to put his dick in the sex doll's mouth, and the doll's mouth won't open.
That's when he realizes it's a sex doll, not a real person.
The girlfriend has a laugh, and explains that's the only way he will have a three-way with her involved.
The man slowly accepts the sex doll as a real partner, he fucks the live girl and the sex doll, and everyone ends happy.
The girlfriend is really cute, I'm not sure why the guy isn't satisfied just with her, but variety is the spice of life, and if it takes a sex doll to make everyone happy, go for it.
But, personally, I would focus more on the girlfriend, Andreina De Luxe, who is not just fine-looking, and sexy as hell, but smart and sassy as well.
Currently the site has 146 videos.
Videos have a runtime of about 20 to 35 minutes.
There is a matching photoset for each video, but the photosets are tiny: anywhere from 6 to 15 photos per video. The photos are either excellent screencaps (made from an excellent software program that converts a video to a photoset), or actual photos.
Since the models range from attractive to gorgeous, I don't know why the site (and network) posts such tiny photosets: the models deserve a full-featured photoset, because the models are lovely, and compare to the models at any fine photo site such as MetArt, MPL Studios, or Femjoy.
Since the network and site feature glamcore hardcore videos, this would be a chance for the network to satisfy a need for glamcore hardcore photosets. Sites like SexArt and The Life Erotic feature glamcore videos and photosets, but in my opinion, the models at the LetsDoeIt network are presented more attractively, and the hardcore action is hotter.
So I fail to understand why the network only offers such tiny photosets.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
My favorite site on the network is The White Boxxx, because the mix of models ranges from attractive to lovely.
The models at XXX Shades can be very attractive, but some of The White Boxxx videos are some of the best-looking glamcore videos on the internet.
And since you get full access to the LetsDoeIt network with a sub to any of the sites in the network, the real value of the network is in the 90s.
What I'm saying is: the exact value of a score for a site, or a network, is a matter of opinion.
What counts is whether a site or network's contents appeals to your tastes.
And the videos at the LetsDoeIt network are some of the best glamcore videos on the internet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-CCBill is the default billing agent. A trusted name. Easy to cancel, easy to deal with.
-Secure login and members pages: https.
-No limits on streaming or downloads that I could find.
-There are many softcore and hardcore sites with attractive to beautiful girls. This site is one of them. Some of the girls are absolutely lovely: great face, great body.
Cons:
-Zip files download with a garbage name.
Example: gallery-1973-1800-61f711ee94714aebc83bd5a83ca74990.zip
Need to put file name into format: Site Name - Model Name - Date Posted - Name of Photoset - File Definition.
-Primitive navigation. For a small site, they need a website designer who can make the site easier to use. See bottom line section for examples.
-The online software for playing a slideshow of a photo gallery is clunky.
-Very limited information of the models: age, country of origin, nothing else.
-Search function is almost useless.
-Listing of models is fucked up. You are supposed to be able to see a listing of the models organized by name or most recent. But both listing methods are fucked up.
If you want to see a listing of models by alphabetical name, you can see the first 14 models listed by alphabetical name on page 1. When you switch to page 2, the names are no longer in alphabetical order.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The second system is to list the models by most recent: except, even on the first page, the models are not listed in the most recent posting to the site. And they are not listed by the first posting of the model to the site.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
The site has approximately 122 models. The models range from attractive to gorgeous. That is the main attraction of the site.
Yonitale is the pay site. There is a free site that is almost a clone of Yonitale: SecretOfPleasure.com. That site gives small sample galleries of the photosets featured at Yonitale.
I assume it's a form of advertising for Yonitale.
I joined Yonitale a few days ago. So I'm still trying to figure out how to use the site.
The navigation is terrible. The search function is poor, and only appears on some member pages, not on all member pages. The software for viewing a slideshow of a gallery is clunky.
With all of these negatives, why did I join the site?
First, some of these negatives only appear after you join the site.
Second, and just as important, some of these girls are absolutely gorgeous.
Many of the models appear on other porn sites: MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, etc.
Many of the models mainly do softcore glamour.
Some of the models also appear in hardcore.
Yonitale is basically a female masturbation site. You get almost all the varieties of female masturbation you can find:
solo masturbation by a girl;
one girl masturbating another girl;
two girls masturbating themselves;
two girls masturbating each other;
three or more girls masturbating;
a guy masturbating a girl (but no intercourse: the guy is using his fingers or a dildo or a vibrator to masturbate the girl).
There might be some element of lesbian activity in the photo sets and videos, but the emphasis is more on the masturbation as a route to sexual pleasure, instead of lesbian activity.
Why did I join the site?
Because some of the girls are freaking georgeous.
I can look at some of the photos of these girls and drool.
The next step up would be looking at the photos and climaxing spontaneously, but the photos are not quite that explosive.
I can dream about these beauties in my sleep, which makes the Yonitale site a worthwhile join.
I suggest browsing the free secret of pleasure site for the sample photos of these models, to see if they are up to your personal standards.
The photos are not quite up to the MetArt or MPL Studio standard of high-gloss glamour photography, but like I said, some of the girls are so gorgeous, you need to see them for yourself.
However, the site navigation is an exercise in frustration.
You want to see a list of the models at the site?
You can search through the 9 pages of the model list (14 models per page, except the last page has 10 models).
You can sort the models by name (alphabetical order) or by most recent (posted to the site).
Except both search methods are fucked up.
Search by name:
The first page has 14 models, listed alphabetically, with a nice-sized thumbnail of the model.
Click on the second page, and the names on that page are no longer in alphabetical order.
Click on the third page, and the names on that page are not in alphabetical order.
Search by most recent:
The first page has 14 models.
Except the order of the model listing is not based on the most recent set posted to the site.
And is not based on when the model was first posted to the site.
So that search order is also fucked up.
I could copy all the model names, and sort them myself, but that would take a while, and it's not worth the trouble.
A better solution: go to an index site such as indexxx.com, hit the websites link, then select the Yonitale link, and then select either the (show models with photo) link or the (show models as text) link.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lovely young teen models.
-The videos have crystal sharp definition, good lighting, good sound control (no random, loud, extraneous background noises). Some of the older
videos have some extraneous background noises and the photography is not always sharp. But the newer videos are well shot photography.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login to the site - with the DieselAccess network.
Cons:
-The cons are minor. rearadmiral and tangub have reported problems with the site (such as poor downloading speeds occasionally), but I have not.
-They should have some posting if the Live Diesel model is late for a public show, or if the show has been cancelled. A simple notice stating
the model has been delayed, and when she might appear online. Or if the show has been cancelled, simply stating that.
-A few videos or photosets might be from years ago, but you couldn't tell it from the posting date. For example, the model Odessa is familiar from years ago. She is also known as Priscilla, Anna, Lily, Yana, Chrissy, Lusy, and Melissa. And she has appeared on more than 25 pay sites.
Anyway, in a video on 18OnlyGirls (a network site to YoungLegalPorn), Odessa states her name as Anna, not Odessa. And she says her age is 18.
She has been doing porn since 2002. The video is dated/posted as 2009-10-07. So the age she states is wrong, or the videos is from years ago.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
But the posted date is a minor problem.
-Some photosets have only one option for downloading, others have 3 options for downloading: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px.
-In the updates section, I wish they would clearly identify each set as "video" or "photo set". Instead, you have to click on the set to find whether it's a video or photos.
-The search (or listing for a model) is specific to each site only. The model Samantha, for example, shows as one set on YoungLegalPorn. You have to transfer to 18onlygirls to see that she also has a set at that site. It would be easier if a single search returns all the sets for a particular model at that network, with each site being listed with the sets for that model. Instead, you have to visit each individual site and do a search to see if the model appears at that site.
-The rearadmiral reported that he had a problem gaining access to all sites in this network even though he paid for all network sites. But that was straighten after a few email. I did not have that problem.
-Also, rearadmiral reported that he connection to the network was very slow at times. My download speed maxes out about 630 KB/s, and I did not have any problems with my download speed. But admiral has a faster connection than my own. And he was using the connection longer than I was. But rearadmiral saw sustained download speeds of less than 20 KB/sec. The Webmaster replied to rearadmiral's comments on PU, and said there was a technical problem and the problem seems to be fixed.
The Webmaster should be giving credit for responding to PU comments so fast, and with an open attitude of trying to fix those complaints.
-Bottom Line (summary):
-Web site features teen girls. Doing masturbation (1 or 2 or more girls). Doing lesbian sex (2 or more girls). Doing sex with a boy (1 or 2 girls, 1 boy). The girls are OK to very attractive.
-videos:
high quality:
width x height: 1280x720
total bitrate: 11013 kbps
802 MB/13 min 46 sec runtime
The newer videos have a high definition option, 720p, along with 480p and 360p.
The older videos from several years ago only have a standard definition option 480p.
photosets:
4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px on some photosets. But the file size for the 4000 px photoset can be 148-250 MB.
-There are live chat sessions with Diesel models that are free with a paid membership, named "Diesel Girls Live".
There are also, separately, chat sessions with other models. The chat sessions with other models can be free. There can also be a charge for the other model chat sessions, in one of two modes: a non-public mode which is open to all members who pay the fee; a separate private chat which would be a one-on-one session with yourself and the chat model.
I think the site is worth a 90. But if you have the problems that rearadmiral or tangub are having, the site is worth far less. The sites has some great looking models. The recent videos are crystal sharp. The photography is ok, showing improvement over time, but not up to standards of MetArt or MPL Studios.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DRM: none.
-Site timeout: Very long period before timeout.
-Download limits: None.
-Model listing is name of model with a nice-sized thumbnail and a listing of her photosets and videos.
-Many of the newer videos are nice quality: clear video, good focus, good lighting, good sex action, very attractive models,
great skin tone, good color of background and foreground, good sound control.
-Most videos have a choice of 3 download qualities to choose from: low, medium or high quality.
Cons:
-Navigation is basic. For a relatively small site, the navigation could be
easily improved to make moving around and finding the photosets/videos of each model faster and simpler.
-Search is limited. You can search by model's name, but for little else.
-They should junk the software system they use to view individual photos.
-No model bios or other information on the models.
-Many of the older videos are very poor quality in terms of clarity, lighting, colors, annoying background music.
-The content is posting dated, but the significance of the date can be low.
Some material was made years before it was posted at this site.
-The free live webcam chats with models are a waste of time. The models basically do nothing
on-screen except wait for someone to pay for a private chat.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
-Number of models: 303+
-Number of videos: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number)
-Number of photosets: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number)
The newer videos are mainly good quality: good lighting, good colors (skin tone, background, foreground), ok to good camera work.
video stats (newer videos):
frame width x height: 1280 x 720
total bitrate: 8572 kbps - 15459 kbps
frame rate: 29 frames/second
photo stats:
photosets: 30-100 photos.
file size: 200-400 Kb (newer photo size).
width x height: 2250 x 1500 pixels.
resolution: horizontal x vertical: 96 dpi x 96 dpi.
Photosets can have from 30 to 100 photos. The file size of an individual photo can be large, up to 400+ Kb, but the photos are not high quality in terms of appeal or photographic technique.
The photosets are more in the style of an amateur-shot photo series done at home, except that I have seen many amateur photos that have much better photo technique than the photosets at this site.
The two primary sites in the dieselaccess network that have the most value are YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls. There are some other sites in the
network that are also worthwhile, but the most value is in those two sites.
YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls are very similar sites: same type of content, same layout, same models, etc. And it appears that some content is shared between the two sites.
YoungLegalPorn takes a softcore approach to porn. By this, I mean that the sex is gentle, not rough or abusive. The sex is caring, affectionate, or friendly, with no slapping, spitting, hitting, name-calling, etc. The sex can be hardcore in the sense there is female masturbation, lesbian activity, boy-girl sex.
I appreciate the overall quality of many videos at this site. But some PU members might think the site is too tame, and would rather watch a harder, edgier type of sex that is featured at many hardcore sites.
The free Diesel cam shows are not shows, but a waste of time where the model does almost nothing except sit or lie on a bed, waiting for someone
to pay for a private show. There is also a mode where the "public free show" turns into a show which is still "public", but you have to pay 1 euro per minute to watch. Supposedly there is some stripping or other action in the non-free public show. The private chats are 3 euros per
minute. So it could get very expensive to watch.
It would probably be cheaper to go to a topless bar to see some stripping, instead of watching it over the internet.
Note: hugow wrote a review of this site on 2011-01-02 and gave it a 50 score because he said the servers were very slow. Most of the files I downloaded from this site (and the other sites in this network) had speeds of 620-630 KB/s, which is my maximum download speed. So I did not experience the poor download speeds hugow reported.
(I recently upgraded my DSL connection, which used to have a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s.)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some improvement in video qaulity over Young Sex Parties, a sister site in the Serious Cash network. But video quality seems amateurish which is not a plus, unless you like to watch poorly shot home sex videos.
-Easy login. Can save username and password for future logins.
-No DRM.
=Long time before site timeout.
-They have videos of some models that appear to be early in their career. I've seen some of these models at other sites. But the names they use for the models are basically random, having no relation to the names these models have at other sites.
-Down Them All download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get slightly over 2 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Can stream or download movies.
Download choices are FLV, MP4, 3GP (for mobile phones).
Cons:
-I believe joining this network means your email address will be opened to lots of spam. Open a new email address for safety.
-Videos have a home-style, amateur feel.
-Search is poor. Many times you can enter a model's name and get 0 results, even though you copied her name from a video you just saw, where her name is listed.
-Advertising for other sites clutters up the members area pages.
-Videos download with generic filenames such as "movie.flv" or "high.mp4", so you have to rename the videos manually to identify who is in the video. But the model's names are generic, so unless you recognize her from other sites and remember her name, the name of a model is almost worthless.
-No list for models' names at the site. No listing of models' thumbnails to show what the models look like.
-No model bios.
-Models are foreign (Russia or from Eastern Europe). So the language spoken in the videos is usually foreign.
-Navigation is poor
Bottom Line:
The site theme is supposed to be amateur videos that are shot at home by amateurs.
There are a few videos I've seen from this site that I thought were good. But trying to search through the site to find those videos is a time-consuming task, because the search function is crap, there is no listing of models with a thumbnail to identify what the models look like, the names given to the models are apparently random, so even if you know what you are looking for, it's a question of whether you will run out of patience before you find it.
This site is a little better than Young Sex Partes because I think the models are a little more attractive. But the videos don't compare to the high quality videos found at quality teen sites. And the videos are also below the general quality of videos at Teen Mega World -in terms of focus, framing, definition, lighting, costumes, etc. I know they are going for an amateur feeling, but I much prefer professionally shot videos that have high quality.
The site design is poor, making site navigation a problem. This site makes you begin to appreciate how easy some other sites are to use. Where search is useful, where you get nice thumbnails to show you what the models look like (along with a name you can use).
You get about 21 sites included in your membership. Most of the sites feature teen hardcore.
I'm giving the site a score of 68. The site navigation is a problem. I don't care for the amateur feel of the videos. I wish the models were more attractive, or at least presented more attractively. I think there are much better sites available, in terms of how easy the sites are to use, the quality of the contents. The network has lots of hardcore videos (and pictures), so the quantity is good, but it's too difficult to slog through the content to find what I would like.
My score of 68 is based on the amount of content at the network. If I were grading this site on my personal enjoyment of the site, I would give it a score in the 50s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Down Them All download manager works at this site.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent.
-The content is dated when posted to the site.
Cons:
-Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use.
-Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like.
-Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages.
-There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart.
-The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless.
-Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts.
BOTTOM LINE:
Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use.
When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos.
Choice of file types for download:
FLV For Windows,
MP4 For Windows, Mac, iPad, iPhone4
MP4 For iPhone3/iPod
MP4 For Sony PSP
3GP For mobile phones
Number of site videos:
The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117.
I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves.
You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages.
So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos.
If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list.
The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store.
The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos.
In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings.
I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-3 sizes for photosets: 800, 1200, 4000 px.
-zip file for each size px for each photoset.
-Online slideshow for photosets.
-Can download the videos or view as streaming.
-Material is exclusive.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark bottom right hand corner of photos.
-Vids have a larger watermark than the photos, small but not tiny, placed at bottom right corner of the picture.
-No DRM.
-No timeout from site.
-Can rate the model, photoset, and video. But this is a matter of personal taste, and I don't agree with a lot of the scores.
-Simple site navigation. Easy to get to the sets and videos of each model.
-One update per day (photoset or video).
-Most photosets have 100+ pictures each.
Cons:
-Videos download as avi files. No other choice of format.
-Videos download as one file size only (no choice of high, medium, low resolution).
-Downloaded files have no descriptive name. Instead, the download file name is a number with "big", "medium" or "small" attatched, depending on whether you are downloading the big, medium or small px set. Downloaded videos are named with a number and the prefix "zemani-v".
-Search is basic but adequate. Can search by model name, age, or hair color. There is a limited number of models and photosets and videos, so this is not a big con.
Bottom Line:
I resisted joining zemani as long as I could. But some of the models at this site are absolutely mouth-watering. I want to sink my teeth and other
body parts into these gorgeous creatures.
Although there are a nice number of photos and photosets for a site that started in 2006, I can't help wishing there were more photosets for my favorite models. Most models only have 1 or 2 photosets.
Site stats (April 4, 2010):
photos 64,806
galleries 471
videos 130
130 videos sounds like a lot of videos. But like many other softcore sites, the videos are short, most less than 10 minutes in runtime. Even
though the videos might have a gorgeous model as the subject, like most softcore sites, the videos are mainly forgettable. The real value lies in the photosets.
The photographic quality of the videos is good to high, but the videos are just ok. I'm much more into softcore than hardcore, but at most softcore
sites, the videos are just plain boring, no matter how attractive the model is. I don't really understand the psychology of why softcore
photosets of a model can be arousing, but a softcore video of the same model is usually boring. That is my reaction to the videos at softcore teen mega-sites.
The TBP review of this site, release date 6 Mar 2010, states the video "content ranges from softcore nude portraits to pussy spreads, girl-girl erotic posing, and more." I saw a number of videos, not all, and the only
content I saw was strictly softcore: no pussy spread, no girl-girl interaction that went beyond two girls that were nude. I found no solitary
or mutual masturbation, no toys, nothing that remotely approached hardcore porn.
There are some videos where the model performs a strip-tease. But you get better, more exciting strip tease at college night at a bar, where the
strippers are non-professional, probably less attractive than the zemani models, but they put on a much better show than the zemani models.
Also, the canned soundtrack on the videos is obtrusive; it adds nothing to the video, and often sounds annoying.
The models are 18 to very early 20s. Almost all Caucasian.
There is a nice mix of different settings/backgrounds for the photoshoots and videos: interior in a house, in a field, a stream, a lake or sea. Most photosets make nice use of colors in the background, the photosets are mainly nicely focused, the model is nicely featured in the shots. Not all shots are perfect, of course, but the photosets are equal to what you find at met-art, mplstudios, high quality glamor-style softcore photosets.
If you are looking for something more explicit than very softcore nudity, go elsewhere. If you are looking for softcore tease or strip tease, you are better off at a different site.
On a value basis, because the softcore teen mega-sites have far greater content, you are better off joining them first. But this is a nice
addition to the category, and the content will build over time. And the site does feature some absolutely yummy girls.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-EASY LOGIN. IF COOKIES ARE ENABLED, TO ENTER THE SITE, JUST GO TO THE SITE URL, AND YOU ARE AUTOMATICALLY LOGGED IN. NO NEED TO ENTER USERNAME OR PASSWORD.
-CCBILL IS THE PAYMENT PROCESSOR. A TRUSTED NAME.
-NO PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON THE JOIN PAGE.
-EACH PHOTOSET HAS A ZIP FILE.
-MANY SETS ALLOW THE MODEL TO SHOW HER PERSONALITY: THE MODELS CAN DISPLAY MISCHIEF, FUN, AN ELEMENT OF NAUGHTINESS OR TEASE, ETC.
-THE SITE MAKES A NICE CHANGE OF PACE FROM THE GLAMCORE OR HARDCORE EROTIC SETS, WITH ITS APPROACH OF NON-NUDE TEASE.
-ALTHOUGH THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE PHOTOS ARE NON-NUDE, SOME OF THE PHOTOS ARE, IN MY OPINION, MORE EROTIC THAN WHAT IS SHOWN AT SITES LIKE METART OR MPL STUDIOS. A GIRL IN A BRA, WITH AN EXPRESSIVE FACE AND STRIKING POSE, BRINGS BACK THE GOOD OLD DAYS OF PLAYBOY AND PENTHOUSE, WHERE SOME OF THE NON-NUDE PHOTOS WERE WORTH COLLECTING, AS WELL AS THE NUDE PHOTOS.
-YES, I WANT TO MODELS TO SHOW EVERYTHING, BUT THAT'S THE HOOK: A TEASE THAT LEAVES YOU WANTING MORE.
Cons:
-PAYPAL IS NO LONGER ACCEPTING PAYMENTS FOR ZISHY.
-PRICE HAS GONE UP. USED TO BE $7.99/MONTH OR $27.99/YEAR.
CURRENTLY, IT'S $9.99/MONTH OR $30/YEAR.
(PU NEEDS TO UPDATE THE PRICE-LISTING.)
-DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ARE SLOW, ABOUT 1-3 MB/S. BUT SINCE EACH GALLERY ZIP FILE IS SMALL (AROUND 50 MB OR LESS), IT ONLY TAKES LESS THAN A MINUTE TO DOWNLOAD AN INDIVIDUAL GALLERY.
-THE MODEL LISTING HAS A NICE-SIZED THUMBNAIL FOR EACH MODEL. EXCEPT FOR SOME MODELS, YOU CAN'T REALLY TELL FROM THE THUMBNAIL WHAT THE MODEL LOOKS LIKE, SO YOU HAVE TO OPEN ONE OF HER SETS TO SEE A BETTER PHOTO.
FOR A PHOTO SITE, THIS IS SURPRISING: YOU WOULD THINK THE PHOTOGRAPHER WOULD CHOOSE BETTER THUMBNAILS TO ILLUSTRATE EACH MODEL.
-DO NOT JOIN THE SITE IF YOU WANT FULL-FLEDGED NUDITY. THERE ARE ONLY OCCASIONAL GLIMPSES OF NUDITY IN THE PHOTOS.
-THE SEARCH ENGINE IS LIMITED: IT WILL SEARCH FOR A MODEL'S NAME.
-UPDATES WITH ONE NEW PHOTOSET EVERY 2 OR 3 DAYS.
Bottom Line:
THE SITE THEME IS: "PHOTOS THAT LEAVE SOMETHING TO THE IMAGINATION." ZISHY IS BASICALLY A NON-NUDE SITE.
MOST OF THE OLDER SETS ARE COMPLETELY NON-NUDE.
SOME OF THE RECENT SETS DO FEATURE A FEW PHOTOS OF A BARE BREAST, A NAKED ASS, OR EVEN AN EXPOSED PUSSY, BUT THERE ARE NO CLOSE-UPS OF THOSE FORBIDDEN AREAS.
THE SITE IS BASICALLY A TEASE OF NUBILE WOMEN WHO ARE YOUNG AND MAINLY ATTRACTIVE.
THIS IS NOT A GLAMOUR SITE. THE MODELS WEAR VERY LITTLE MAKE-UP, AND ARE MAINLY DRESSED IN REGULAR STREET CLOTHES. THE AVERAGE TEENAGER AT A MALL WEARS MORE MAKEUP, AND CAN OFTEN BE SEEN IN FLASHIER CLOTHES. ZISHY IS BASICALLY A TEASE SITE, WHERE YOU GET TO VIEW PHOTOS OF ATTRACTIVE WOMEN, AND WANT TO SEE MORE OF THEM.
THERE ARE SOME VIDEOS AT THE SITE: BUT THE VIDEOS ARE VERY SHORT, MOSTLY UNDER 3 MINUTES, AND DON'T HOLD A LOT OF VALUE.
THE MEMBERSHIP PRICE USED TO BE EXTREMELY INEXPENISVE:
$7.99/MONTH OR $27.99/YEAR.
RECENTLY, THERE WAS A PRICE INCREASE:
$9.99/MONTH OR $30/YEAR.
MAYBE I'M FOOLISH, BUT AT $7.99/MONTH, IT SEEMED LIKE A STEAL.
ACTUALLY, I JOINED FOR THE YEARLY MEMBERSHIP AT $27.99/YEAR FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS.
I DON'T VISIT THE SITE THAT OFTEN, BUT I THINK I'M SUPPORTING A SITE THAT I LIKE.
HOWEVER, WITH THE PRICE INCREASE TO $9.99/MONTH, I WOULD BE MORE HESITANT TO JOIN.
EXCEPT I WOULD PROBABLY GO FOR THE $30/YEAR MEMBERSHIP OPTION.
THINKING I AM SUPPORTING A SITE THAT I LIKE.
ONE OF THE REASONS I LIKE THE SITE IS THAT IT SHOWS YOU HOW MUCH INFLUENCE A PHOTOGRAPHER CAN HAVE OVER THE APPEARANCE OF A MODEL.
MANY OF THE MODELS AT THE SITE ARE PORN MODELS.
EXCEPT YOU WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE MOST OF THEM FROM THEIR APPEARANCE AT ZISHY.
YOU ONLY KNOW THEY ARE A PORN STAR AT OTHER SITES BECAUSE YOU RECOGNIZE THE MODEL NAME.
(MOST EUROPEAN PORN MODELS HAVE A MULTITUDE OF NAMES, THAT VARY FROM SITE TO SITE, AND CAN EVEN HAVE DIFFERENT NAMES AT THE SAME SITE.)
BUT IF YOU HAVE A GOOD MEMORY, OR USE A PORNSTAR INDEX LIKE INDEXXX.COM, YOU CAN OFTEN FIND MANY OF THE ZISHY MODELS ARE FEATURED AT OTHER PORN SITES.
ZISHY IS A U.S. BASED SITE, MAINLY SHOOTING IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA.
SO THE MODELS ARE MAINLY U.S. MODELS.
U.S. MODELS NORMALLY HAVE FAR FEWER ALIASES THAN EUROPEAN MODELS.
SO U.S. MODELS ARE EASIER TO FOLLOW.
ZISHY IS A NON-GLAMOUR SITE. THERE IS VERY LITTLE MAKEUP USED. AT MOST PORN SITES, THERE IS AN EFFORT TO MAKE THE MODELS ATTRACTIVE. AT ZISHY, THE APPROACH IS TO SHOWCASE THE NATURAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE MODEL, WITH MINIMUM MAKEUP, NO GLAMOUR SETTINGS OR COSTUMES.
FOR ME, IT JUST SLAPS ME UP THE SIDE OF THE HEAD (MAKES ME REALIZE) HOW A WOMAN CAN APPEAR LOVELY OR EROTIC WITH MAKEUP AND LIGHTING AND COSTUME, AND APPEAR SO MUCH LESS ATTRACTIVE WITHOUT MAKEUP OR SPECIAL LIGHTING OR ATTRACTIVE CLOTHES.
(SORT OF LIKE THE OLD MENNEN SKIN BRACER (AFTER SHAVE) COMMERCIALS, WHERE A MALE MODEL SLAPS HIMSELF AND SAYS: "THANKS, I NEEDED THAT."
THE SITE DESIGN IS BASIC, BUT EASY TO USE.
THERE IS A SEARCH BOX WHERE YOU CAN INPUT THE MODEL'S NAME, AND HER SETS WILL DISPLAY.
ON THE HOME PAGE, THERE IS ARE LINKS PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED FOR:
GALLERIES - GIRLS - ABOUT- LISTS - CONTACT
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 85.
THE REASONS FOR THE SCORE:
THE SITE DOES A FINE JOB OF NON-NUDE TEASE.
THERE ARE A FEW NUDE PHOTOS IN SOME OF THE PHOTOSETS OF THE LAST FEW YEARS.
THE GIRLS ARE MAINLY ATTRACTIVE.
SOME OF THE GIRLS ARE EXTREMELY ATTRACTIVE.
THE SITE IS EASY TO USE/NAVIGATE ON A BASIC LEVEL. BUT CAN'T DO SOPHISTICATED SEARCHES.
$10/MONTH IS NOT AS ATTRACTIVE $8/MONTH, FOR A PORN SITE. ESPECIALLY ONE THAT OFFERS ONLY SINGLE-SITE ACCESS.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very low membership fee. $7.99/month, or $27.99/year.
-A nice selection of attractive models. Mixture of amateur and professional porn models.
-CCBILL is the payment processor, a trusted name.
-Update rate averages 3-4 new photo sets per week.
-Zishy is based in L.A., California. The girls are a mixture of models and college girls.
-Easy login. After you login to the site, the following logins don't require a username and password, (with cookies enabled).
Cons:
-This is primarily a non-nude site. Do not join if you want to see full-blown nudity, or hard-core sex.
-Although there are many attractive girls, this is not a glamour site: the models are shot with little make-up, with regular-style clothes. The models appear like the girl-next-door.
You honestly would not recognize many of these girls you might have seen at other porn sites, unless you study them and compare them with photos from other sites. The average teenager at a shopping mall or on the street wears more make-up than most of the models photographed at Zishy.
-This is mainly a photo site. There are videos, but the videos are short, most under 3 minutes, some videos under a minute.
Bottom Line:
Zishy is basically a non-nude site.
Occasionally you will see a naked ass, uncovered nipples, even less will you see a naked pussy.
The site theme is less is more: the female form is better served covered, which lets the imagination free to roam.
The aim is to entertain through innocent and playful means.
What is suprising is that you can't tell the professional models from the amateurs unless you have a keen eye and a lot of history with porn models. Basically, the professional porn models are presented as amateurs, with very little of their normal make-up, in regular clothes, in non-porn poses and settings.
The truth is, you will find the average teenager in a shopping mall wears far more make-up, and is better dressed, than the models at Zishy.
In the last year or more, you are seeing a few naked breasts, a few naked asses, but the majority of the photos are still non-nude. This is not a site you should join to see nudity.
It can be interesting to compare the photo sets of the porn models at Zishy with their sets at porn sites.
It illustrates how much the photographer can influence how attractive a model will appear in a photo.
I've said it before, but it bears repeating: a model can appear average-looking, or very attractive, or extremely lovely, depending on how she is photographed. Some sites specialize in making their models as glamorous as possible. Zishy photographs their models to appear "natural", not glamorized or heavily made-up.
When I started checking how many of the models at Zishy were porn models, I was surprised at the number that were featured in soft-core and hard-core sites. Because you would not have any hint from the Zishy photo sets that many of
these girls are willing to show everything they have at more explicit porn sites.
A very few of the models at Zishy who are featured in more well-known porn sites are:
Alaina Fox
Alex Mae
Alice Wonder
Amber Sym
Bailey Rayne
Bree Daniels
Keisha Grey
Dillion Harper
Kenze Thomas
Lily Ivy
Samantha Rone
Jayden Taylors
Maybe my brain is very slow, but I found it fascinating how different a model can appear at the Zishy site versus her appearance at a regular porn site. For some models, you really have to examine the girl, to see it's the same person.
But then again, there are so many porn models out there, that some models resemble each other fairly closely.
Bottom line:
Since the price is so low ($7.99/month, or $27.99/year), it's worth joining to see what the site has to offer. As long as you are not expecting a nude site, Zishy is mainly very softcore tease.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
