Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : dracken (0)

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428) Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 51-75 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 51 Elegant Anal (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 95 videos with regular updates two or three times a month. - Streaming in multiple formats, always very fast for me, even when not on the best internet. - Well filmed scenes with a good mix of wide shots and closeup's on the girl's faces (especially when they first move into anal sex or if they really get into it) - Good light and a nice mix of positions, action and location. Some scenes only have anal sex, some decently long shots of pussy eating and rimming, some scenes are filmed on the floor, some have couches or beds... you get the idea it's a pretty varied mix. - Modern web page design, you can filter scenes by quite a few categories, the videos thumbnails auto play a preview when you hover over them, responsive mobile design. Everything you'd want in a modern site. The only big downside is that the model page is decent but shows models on the whole network, you can't see all the models that are on just on Elegant Anal - Good looking models. - Great photos. Cons: - Most of the models are pretty well known European actresses (Linda Sweet, Gina Gerson, Ivana Sugar) Not necessarily a con, but they have a certain look. - While there is a nice variety in the video premise and location I believe all scenes are boy-girl. Don't expect gang bangs or threesomes, I didn't even see any toys being used. - Some scenes are pretty short. The average is around 30-35 minutes, but for example the scene with Foxy Di and Martina Gold are each 19 minutes and there's a handful of other scenes that are around 25 minutes. No bonus behind the scenes footage or interviews or anything like that either. - Quite a lot of ads, the first page when you log in is an ad you have to close, there are pretty big animated banners at the bottom of each page. Since I only had a streaming subscription I periodically would get a banner asking me to unlock downloads. Bottom Line: Let me start off by saying that I got access to this site through a streaming only subscription to babes.com, so I'm not sure how the download options work. It seems like it would be fine as they advertise unlimited downloads, but I can't comment on that. Speaking of streaming, if you're not sure and want to check the site out that's a pretty good option since it gives you access to pretty much everything with the only downside being a pretty big banner that pops up every time I logged in reminding me I should upgrade to download. That said, the content here is pretty good. The models are really gorgeous and the filming style works pretty well overall. There are a lot of tracking shots, soft light and a nice balance of closeups and wide shots. I am also really impressed with the variation in locations, I don't believe any of the scenes are filmed in the same room. If you ever wanted to see anal sex scenes in a restaurant, barbershop, sauna or in a pool this site has you covered. As far as action there's a decent amount of positions (partially due to the locations), every scene has at least several minutes of anal in a few positions and most also have some oral and vaginal sex. Unfortunately not a lot of ATM (26 scenes are tagged as such) and if they use toys it's very brief (3 scenes are tagged as using toys). There are also a decent amount of scenes that end with an anal creampie or the male model cumming on the girl's ass, which is a nice change compared to the standard facial. Unfortunately it's a bit hard to find these scenes since the tags are not always that accurate. Another downside for me was that the set up is quickly brushed aside. Most scenes jump to the sex within 2 minutes, and the girls are completely naked within at most 4 minutes, which feels like a wasted opportunity. There are a lot of cute outfits that could be kept on or more slowly stripped off to add to the whole glamour side of the site, especially since a lot of the videos are only 30 minutes. There is one particular scene with Linda Sweet where she is dressed as a business woman/ FBI agent and she slowly undresses while getting seduced by a con-man, keeping her stocking and garter belt on, it was a very well done scene that used the setup well. I wish there were more scenes in that style, it would have made the site stand out more when compared to Tushy, Hardx, Holed or 21naturals. At the end of the day, that's probably the biggest downside, while well done there isn't anything that really stands out here. You can get more scenes at any of the sites I mentioned above, the models are pretty well known so you can see them do anal in other places and while there are some good scenes here I don't know if I can recommend it unless you're a big fan of anal glam porn and have seen the stuff other sites have. 12-05-18  07:33pm Replies (0) Review 52 Evil Angel (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: - Over 12,000 scenes, but I'm gonna hazard and say at least a few thousand of the old ones are not the best quality (480p). That said you still get well over 10,000 scenes. - A lot of variety in the scenes, there's European pornstars shot by Rocco and Nacho Vidal, there's Le Wood and Manuel Ferrara and the unique style of Mike Adriano. Almost every scene has a different style and even if you don't like one director, there's enough variety to keep things interesting - Frequent updates and you can even see what scenes are upcoming. - Navigation is pretty awesome it works well both on phone and on the desktop and it's easy to find particular categories or a particular model. - Some interesting exclusive features. A while back they did a whole vampire move series (Voracious), recently they released a "documentary" (I am Angela) as well as some more plot heavy movies. It's nothing too crazy and there's still plenty of sex, but still interesting and different. Cons: - Most videos are 1080p, I don't believe they offer any 4k videos if that's what you're looking for. - While zipped photo galleries are available they are not the focus, some scenes don't have any photos of the sex, just glamour shots of the models, some have screen caps and some have only a handful of photos. It depends a lot on the director. I still found plenty of content, just don't expect great pics of every scene. - Since a lot of content is from certain directors when someone leaves (Mike Adriano recently departed and only updates his own site at True Anal) there are no more updates in that style. Also not all scenes are available on here. Proxy Paige shot a lot of scenes that are not available here, same with Bryan Gozzling... sometimes it can be frustrating wondering if a scene from a certain director will be released here later or if you should join their site as well. Bottom Line: The strength of the site is the variety it offers, they hire a lot of different directors and also shoot their own exclusive content so in some ways it almost feels like you have a membership to a dozen sites with a dozen different flavors. Some directors seem focused on finding new talent and shooting intense scenes with them, others focus on all anal scenes and yet others go for fetish shoots. Digging through the archive you are bound to find something interesting from transsexual scenes to BBW to interracial to gang bangs, there's at least a handful of scenes in almost every niche (although sometimes there's only a handful of scenes... so if you're looking for a specific type of scene you might only find a few good matches). The site also comes up on sale pretty often and I've often gotten a membership for 10 bucks around a holiday before. At that price it's 100% worth it. All of that said, this site is not necessarily for everyone, they don't have a focus on HD, "passionate" sex in the style of Tushy or 21 natural. The scenes here are a bit more rough (not in a bad way, but don't expect a lot of soft lighting and sensuous action) and some scenes are a bit intense (think gapes and speculums, sloppy BJ's and a lot of ATM). They also don't do a lot of interviews, there are plenty of BTS scenes where they chat with the girls, but don't expect the long interviews from Woodman Casting or Backroom casting couch. It really comes down to what kind of scenes you prefer, but if nothing else EvilAngel is a good place to check out as a way to try new directors and figure out what kind of scenes you prefer before joining their site directly. 11-15-18  10:53pm Replies (1) Review 53 Evil Angel (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A lot of content and frequent updates (Scenes : 6516, over 1000 DVD's and they seem to update scenes daily, sometimes two scenes in one day) - Hardcore stuff here, a lot of DP, a lot of anal. Around 2500 anal scenes, Ass to mouth (1513), Around 1000 DP and around 50 double anal... pretty crazy stuff in here. Also a decent amount of tranny stuff and a surprising amount of Asian girls doing anal. - A lot of good looking girls with a nice a mix of American and Russian cute girls like Chastity Lynn, Proxy Paige, Aspen Richardsen, Isabella Clark, etc. A lot of big name porn stars and several amateurs - I believe all videos are available in different formats, including mobile video, MP4 and WMV. But only the more recent ones are available in high resolutions (older ones are a most 480p and most new ones are 720p, with some 1080p ) - Almost all scenes have photos, but some have only a handful while others have over 100 images. No zip archives as far as I could tell. Cons: - Older content is interesting, but a bit disappointing. I almost wish they'd give you the option to filter it out. - Model navigation is hard with many models listed incorrectly or under different names. Some links to models don't work and they display the male models along with the female ones. There is a sort function but it doesn't work very well. - Navigation overall was a bit clunky, with a lot of focus on directors of the DVD or the DVD itself. You can easily find all scenes directed by Mike Adriano, but the related scenes aren't really relevant half the time. - Some content or very similar is already available on other sites (anal acrobats is a great example, but a lot of girls appear with the exact same male actor on 21sextury for example) - It's a bit hard to preview scenes, as all you get are some tags which are not always accurate and one preview image. Although they tell you the length and size of the scene. - Scene quality and content is a bit all over the place. Bottom Line: This is another mega site and it feels like one. You get more content than you could surf in years and with very frequent updates you won't get bored soon. There are a lot of girls, some amateurs but a lot of them well known pornstars. The action is more hardcore then the average big network site (I'd say more hardcore then Porn Pros, Reality Kings and even Hustler, to name a few, but right on par with 21 sextury or Teencoreclub) There are a lot of niches, including some great deep-throat POV scenes, some very nice lesbian scenes and a lot of anal. However,like most big networks that have been around for a while searching through the older content is a lot like venturing deep into the jungle armed only with a flimsy weed whacker. The older links, tags and even the content of the video is a bit confusing. You could easily watch a video halfway through before realizing it's a transvestite blow-job scene. The tags say blowjob and anal play but there are no actors listed and the image is too grainy to tell what is going on. Yes, a lot of the older stuff is shot with bad light, poor camerawork and a general feel that reminds one of 80's VHS porn. Even worse, some of these older DVD's are mixed in with more recent updates, making it hard to mark a point in time past which you should not venture. That being said the vast majority of scenes are much better quality and the new updated tend to be HD, and very well labeled. Overall I'd say you get maybe 4000 good scenes out of the 6500 available and their number grows every day, with many, many exclusive scenes (although you can get some of them with the bonus evilangel membership on videobox the site still has a decent number of exclusive DVD's) While this kind of quantity is a great thing, navigating it can still be a bit tricky. The site follows a DVD system more then a streaming scenes or nice websites model. You can easily identify what DVD each scenes belongs to, who directed it and browse other scenes from the DVD, but it's a bit hard to find related anal scenes or all scenes by a particular model that are also DP scenes. In fact the best way to find content is to select a DVD title (like Buttman adventures or Slurpy Throatsluts to give you a taste of the content available here :) and then navigate the scenes available on that DVD. That is the only way I found to get an animated preview for each scene as well as some quick categories of what the scene will contain. It seems a bit backwards in the era of streaming internet scenes, but the authors of the site clearly would prefer to just release everything as DVD's. This also means that each DVD is different in tone. Some feature only American girls and there are pretty standard interviews and English commentary during sex. Some DVD's feature Russian girls who barely talk or are completely quiet. Some scenes are pretty rough with make-up running down the girls faces, while some are softcore or solo masturbation. You have the Anal acrobats fetish DVD's (ever wanted to see milk shot up a girls ass?) and leather face masks, but on the other hand there are some blow job only DVD's that are pretty mainstream and tame. There are also several DVD's focused on women with strap-ons or shemales fucking guys, around 500 scenes or so, not much but it's a bit strange that they don't really have a separate page for that. Then again, they don't have a separate page for the vintage videos although there are dozens of them. It's a bit of mish-mash and sometimes it's hard to know what you're looking at. A more in-depth description of the scenes or the ability to preview them from the scene navigation page instead of having to go to the DVD page would have been nice. An easier way to navigate the female models would also have been helpful. Overall I'd have to say that this site could learn a thing or two from 21Sextury when it comes to organizing the website. I mentioned 21sextury a few times, because the content here reminds me a lot of their stuff. There are anal lesbians, a lot of DP, several of the male and female actors appear in both, I sear even one or two of the outfits appear on both sites (mind you a different scene, but the same studio, same girl same male model) This is of course true of only some of the Russian videos, but it's still a bit strange. The one area where evilangel is really different is that a lot of the girls look a bit more mature and they like to dress the girls in interesting outfits (Lexi Belle in a bunny costume anyone?) Overall I'd have to say that the hardcore content, the cute girls and the exclusive scenes make this a must for anyone who likes anal or deep-throating. If you're really on the fence check out what they offer on the Videobox membership deal (I believe it's only 15 bucks on top of the videobox membership, so it's significantly cheaper). 04-29-12  06:44pm Replies (3) Review 54 Exploited College Girls (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of a network with a handful of similar sites, most notable Backroom Casting Couch, Net Video Girls and Black Ambush. - I believe they now have around 750 videos with about one update per week. Keep in mind that number includes 2 videos (POV and tripod) for some older scenes as well as some returning models. They also have a nice upcoming section showing the next 3 models. - Almost entirely amateur models, the whole point of the site is that these are new girls to the porn industry and while a few of the models showed up on other sites for the most part this is the only place you can see them. - In my opinion they have mostly really attractive girls but they have a very distinct "girl next door" look. Don’t expect super-glamorous videos of well known models here. Most scenes have an intro interview as well as an exit interview after the scene is over so you get a good sense for the girl’s personality. - They finally have photos of the sex in archived zipped filed. Cons: - Like pretty much all the sites in this network, the web design is dated. It’s pretty much the same design since 2012 or so when I first joined this site. It works alright, and the tags are very useful but things could be improved. - These are amateur girls and it shows, some scenes are really hot some scenes can be a bit awkward with the girl seeming to zone out a bit. I think overall there’s a lot of quality content here, but don’t expect every scene to be at the same level. - They try to vary up the action, but ultimately they don’t have the budget of a huge network with a lot of financial backing so expect some less than professional lights and editing and the same male model. I personally don’t think it’s an issue and if anything it ads to the videos, but to each their own. - I do wish they had better photos, but again, the limits of a small network. Bottom Line: I’ve been an on and off member of this site for years. I first joined before they were partnered with Backroom Casting Couch and back in those days I’d have a hard time justifying the membership, but between the other sites in the network and the substantial backlog this has become one of my go to places for scenes of amateur girls. Speaking of amateur I believe I said something similar in my Backroom Casting Couch review, but don’t expect this site to have the level of production something like Tushy has. The videos are decently edited and there are a lot of side-by side views (one focused on the girl’s face and one focused on the action) but this is not the professional, perfectly lit set of a typical porn. Almost all scenes are filmed in a hotel room (sometimes with oral sex in a car on the way to the hotel, the light is sometimes too artificial and the make-up on the models could be more professionally done, but again, this is a small operation and in some way that is all part of the appeal (at least for me, but I love seeing girls in their own outfits and own makeup). Also the models are mostly very cute and attractive, but often not in a perfectly polished porn-star way. There is some amount of awkwardness, some scenes that are meant to be anal end up just as anal toy or anal fail videos, there are some awkward interview answers and so on... you get the idea. This is a lot closer to the girl’s real personality than most porn sites get for the better or worse. Most scenes are boy-girl but they have diversified the videos a bit with around 50 or so threesome scenes and around 150 anal scenes. Most scenes include around 10-20 minutes of interview, a scene of the girl dressing or showering (some of the older scenes even show the girls getting ready to do an enema) and an exit interview. Most videos are around the hour mark, which for me is a bonus, but could easily become too much if you don’t care about the model. So all of that said, it ultimately comes down to what kind of porn do you prefer. I’ll keep my subscriptions to the big networks, but when I’m tired of seeing the same familiar models (believe it or not sometimes I don't want to see Mick Blue paired with Zoey Monroe again) I like to jump to this network and see some unknown girl laugh at how big the sex toys are or share some embarrassing story about when they first tried anal. It's a nice change of pace and while not every update here is for me, every time I subscribe I grab at least 20-30 scenes that make it into my permanent collection. I’d also like to note that some of the threesome scenes they got in 2018 are outstanding, well worth the money (Paige and Elena have a lot of chemistry as do Naomi and Bonnie). I hope they continue to do more of these in the future. 12-17-18  02:54pm Replies (0) Review 55 Exploited College Girls (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Kinda hard to tell how many models they have but by my calculation it should be close to 200. - Almost all of the girls were new to me and they looked like actual amateurs (or at least not the seasoned porn stars we get on many other sites) - The whole angle of the site is similar to backroomcastingcouch, but a bit more focused on getting the girl made-up, getting her in sexy outfits and convincing her to do DP or Anal. (Several of the girls have more than one scene. A hardcore initiation video and a anal or DP shot) - Videos are available in several formats (most recent ones seem to be around 640x340 WMV, while older are 480x360 MPG) Videos run very long, several at 1 hour or so with interviews as well as some behind the scene stuff (make-up, different outfits etc.). - Images available for almost all scenes as zip (1200x1600) - A lot of very very cute models who are nervous and seem extremely genuine. - Weekly updates Cons: - More navigation options are necessary. Right now you can navigate the scenes by update date or by model, no way to find all DP scenes, or all Anal, or all POV. No search function, very basic design. - The site didn't let me download more than 2 scenes at once, it didn't even let me navigate the site while the downloads were going on. - The bonus sites are some strange streaming only sites that required me to install a strange plug-in. - A lot of the older videos have really bad lighting/ camerawork. I remember one particular scene where the girl's skin looks yellow and for several shots you get a giant lense-flare. - Older scenes offer a POV and a third person camera view, while newer stuff only seems to have one camera angle, although there are multiple cameras around. - The descriptions of the scenes are very detailed, but rather useless as they don't have a quick category break-down. - There is a lot of talking in the videos which might put some people off. Bottom Line: I joined this site after enjoying Backroomcastingcouch on and off for about a year and have to say that this site is very similar, even sharing some of the models. In case you're not familiar with this type of site, they focus on "real" girls doing a porn scene for their first time. The scenes are filmed by one or two guys with handheld cameras or fixed tripods, start with an interview, and go into pretty rough sex (they have several anal scenes, the girls give rim-jobs to the guy, there is some deepthroat and pretty good facials). As far as I could tell with one or two exceptions all the models are new-comers to the scene and exclusive. (they have Lexi belle and Nicole ray, but mostly you get some very cute looking amateurs). As any amateur site some girls are really into the sex and are freaky, while some just giggle or talk non stop, while looking extremely nervous. You get several scenes with awkward "stop, I can't do that" or strange moans. Also, while the girls are very cute for the most part, they are not perfect models. You get to see a bit of a fat roll, or some stretch marks on their breasts. If you're a fan of "real" women as opposed to the standard porn-star look this can be great, otherwise it can be a bit of a let down. Just don't expect the airbrushed look of hustler or playboy. Several scenes have the girls change into more sexy outfits from their regular clothes, or take breaks in between different sex acts, so there is a bit of lack of continuity (I remember one scene where the girl blows a guy in the back seat of a car, then dresses up in a cute school-girl outfit and has regular sex with him... it was rather strange to see them go from a BJ to striping, back to a BJ, but on the other hand it keeps the content varied and interesting.) Also during most scenes the guy talks to the girl almost the entire shoot, asking her if she ever went so deep on someone's cock or if she ever had her vagina spread open by such a huge dildo or other standard porn conversation along those lines. Depending on the girl and how into it she is this can make the scene a lot better (I remember one girl that to her surprise really enjoys having a dildo in her ass and is extremely cute as she tries to describe the sensation) Then again, if you prefer your porn silent this will be yet another let down. For me the small mistakes as well as the awkwardness of most girls made the site feel fresh and interesting, but I can easily see how some might find it frustrating. It really depends on what you want from your porn. If you enjoy amateur porn and like behind the stage stuff you should really like this site, but if you want a more mainstream porn experience there are many other networks that offer better value. If you are unsure if you want to be a member of this site or not I recommend checking out Backroomcastingcouch since I feel that site is more mainstream, but very similar. Two of the biggest differences from Backroomcastingcouch is that this site focuses more on toys and for many scenes you can get a separate POV or third person shoot of the action. Also I'd say that this site has more younger looking models while casting couch has a lot of varied models. Either way both are good if you want more realistic porn. Now that I discussed the content a bit, I'd like to mention some of the negative stuff. The download limit of only two videos at once was really disappointing, and the fact that older scenes are really poor quality is really a shame. I'd say that basically maybe a bit over half the scenes are worth downloading since everything older is shot in poor video quality and has strange color issues. The bonuses for the site are a joke (they mention 23 sites, but they are streaming only, non exclusive stuff that is really not worth your time) If they would add Backroomcastingcouch as a bonus site this would be an epic network, as it stands though it is a bit pricey for a singe site. Navigation has to improve. Right now this is one of the most basic sites I've seen out there. No search features, no real way to tell when the older scenes were updated, the model index is very basic, and there is a different page layout for the older stuff. Not very good thumbnail previews and no streaming. Finally, the images are also a joke, most of them rather poor quality and several not even showing the sex scenes. This is a video centric site and it really feels like one. There are other minor issues, for example the main male model always blurs his face which can cover up some of the action if he's giving head or using a toy on the girl, he always holds a camera for the POV scene and that can get in the way sometimes. Overall the site is good, very good if you like this type of amateur content. For someone like me this was a great find and along with Backroom castingcouch one of my favorite places for amateur porn. If they get a face lift this is a 90 instead of an 89. 10-23-11  05:10pm Replies (0) Review 56 Facial Abuse (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 171 scenes about half of them in relatively small mpeg resolutions (300x something) and about half in several high definition formats (640x480, 720x480,1280x720 1920x1080) Also the download speeds are ridiculous two 1280 movies at over 1 gb each were down in about half an hour. - each scene has photos at 1440px × 960px. Zipped archives are available. - a lot of amateur looking girls (some cuter than others) and some real hotties like Amai Liu, Faye Runaway and Gina Lyn - easy browsing, although a better search function would have been nice. - really, really hardcore stuff. Deepthroating, a lot of anal and in the newer videos...a lot and I mean a lot of abuse. Cons: - some of the girls are hotter than others and since they are theoretically amateurs you have everything from a goth chick with a pentagram tattooed on her back to a deaf girl and some chicks that should really not be in porn...I guess the site wins in the variety section. - many of the more recent scenes are way to abusive. I mean I'm okay with anal sex, choking, even the spitting in the girls face (I have no clue who get's off to that but whatever...) Yet seeing some girls cry and beg the cameraman to do something else besides anal, or seeing a girl scream for them to turn off the camera...half the videos made me feel sorry for the girl (especially the new ones) You can really see that these girls signed up for more than they can handle and if that turns you on fine, for me it was a turn-off. - the racial slurs were too much for me to handle. In Amai Liu's scene they keep making "sucky sucky" and "love me long time" jokes over and over again. NOT FUNNY! Bottom Line: I am really trying to be objective in my review. This site offended me, (every girl is insulted and not even cleverly. The camera man just calls them whores and hillbillies and makes fun of their heritage in a pointlessly mean way.) but I guess some people will like it so I'll try to be objective. This is one of the most abusive sites out there (even compared to Anal Acrobats and Buttman and Teach my Ass). In the earlier scenes the girls are cum covered but they look like they had some fun. In the more recent videos in the best case scenario the girl looks like she's thinking "Money, just hold out and get the money." In the worst case the girl runs away or she starts crying and bargaining with the cameraman. I guess if very rough sex is your fantasy this site is awesome. For me, especially after seeing nublies where the girls are treated like gorgeous special beings, this site was very depressing. Especially brutal was the scene where the girl has anal sex and collapses, but the guy pulls her back up onto his cock. Depressing... On the positive side, the quality of the videos, the download speeds and the network content is good. For 20 bucks through PU this is a very good deal. But be warned if you don't want to see extreme porn don't go here. 10-07-09  09:43pm Replies (2) Review 57 Femdom Time (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 190 movies and photo sets with the last update on 29.05.2012 (it seems like the site updates very infrequently and the quality of the updates can vary a lot. Everything seems to have stopped in 2009 and they are only now resuming updates) - Videos are around 382x240 resolution and only available as WMV full-length or clips. - The images are more interesting with 864px × 1,296px high resolution options. Zip archives are also present. - The site needs a bit more web design love but is workable. - A nice idea was that each item used in a scene is presented in a separate photo with a description. - Some cute female models and a lot of corsets and stockings. Also the action varies a lot from scenes where a guy is forced to pleasure a woman to scenes where the male is pissed on or his genitalia is punished in all sorts of odd ways. - There seems to be a strong focus on heels and feet. - Decent download speeds Cons: - Video resolution is a huge downside. Also several images are not really timed well (expect many shots of models blinking or being caught with a goofy look on their faces)Images where the models just sit around without any action are also abundant. - Updates are sporadic. They promised several new scenes for March and May but so far nothing. All of 2012 saw 3 updates, the last one before that was in 2009. I'm hesitant to call the site completely dead, but they need to show more involvement. - No search features, also some of the models on the model page are not available on the actual site. Overall the webdesign feels dated and could use a face-lift. - A personal thing here, but most of the male models didn't seem very interested in what was going on. Most of the time they are completely flaccid and have "far-away" looks on their faces. - There are some ads in the member's section. Nothing to major, but they are there. Bottom Line: I'm not normally into bondage, but what attracted me to this site were some of the cute models and the promise of corsets, high heals and stockings. I also liked the idea of a site where the girls would do whatever turned them on and get satisfied by using the guys as basically walking toys. On one hand the site does have several good looking models, although they tend to skew more towards the mature MILF area than I'd like. They also wear some very exciting outfits and the girls wear clothes in most scenes, even in several scenes where they have sex with the guy, making for some pretty decent shots. Unfortunately the action is not really what I was hoping for. I had hoped that the women would be at least pretending to have orgasms, instead if anyone comes in the scene it's the guy, while the woman tries to look mean as she is jerking him off. A bit of a let down were also the lesbian scenes where the girls don't interact with each other very much. The entire focus of the scenes here are the males who get analy probed and have clamps placed on their balls... both of which don't really seem to be very pleasing to the girls, but I guess that's the spiel here. Combine this with what I believe was a complete lack of interest on the part of the male models and the whole site doesn't really sell me on the femdom fantasy. Overall I was left feeling like everyone involved was just there for the money. Now don't get me wrong, there are a few shots that are interesting. Seeing a girl blow a guy who is suspended upside down is rather hot, especially since she's wearing a very hot red corset, but the scene just ends. I wish she would have masturbated to a climax or otherwise used him to pleasure herself. Maybe it's just me and my expectations though so I won't doc points to heaving because of this. What I will take points off for is the lack of better videos. The majority are low resolution and rather short. Sure the images are hot but the lack of better clips is really disappointing. Also there is no really easy way to navigate the site. There are a few categories such as Bondage, Other sex, Femdom, but only Female Domination has more than a handful of scenes under it. There is also no search for anal or pee or lesbian scenes. Even worse several of the models are not present on the model page and in return some girls on the model page are not available on the site. Someone needs to update some links. Overall I feel like there have to be better femdom sites out there or at least ones that update regularly, however if you like photos and the models in the tour look really hot there are some great images in here. As long as you don't expect anything mind blowing. 06-26-12  05:39pm Replies (0) Review 58 Filipina Coeds (0) 50.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Around 50+ scenes (various sizes from 320 for the older ones to 640 for the more newer ones. Overall the quality could be seriously improved) - Images are around (1,000px × 750px) but I couldn't find any zipped options for the images, which is really a shame. - The streaming option works well. - You also get access to Thai coeds which contains more of the same style of scenes - A decent mix of hardcore sex and lesbian videos I'd say maybe half are lesbian and half pov style sex. - The whole site feels like two guys encounters with a lot of Asian prostitutes in a hotel room (for better or worse) One one hand a lot of the girls are cute and seem genuine. We also get to see how they are picked up and how they interact while not shooting the actual scene. On the other hand... well read more in the cons section - Good download speeds and okay-ish navigation Cons: - Strange update schedule ( most of the videos seem to be from June 7th with a few more from the rest of the summer. Nothing very recent.) - Most scenes are filmed in a hotel room and this means a lot of shots that are too dark, out of focus or otherwise very amateur-ish. The fact that a lot of the scenes are in 320 resolution makes this site an even sadder experience. - The girls are clearly not porn stars and they don't speak English so we either get some scenes filmed in dead silence with the girl looking like she's mentally somewhere else, or scenes where the girls talk to each other constantly in another language and giggle about kissing each other. This of course cold be great is it's what you're looking for. - Most scenes are watermarked Asiabootleg.com. Not sure what the deal is between the two sites. -Thai coeds, the sister site you get access to didn't work for me half the time so while in theory you get two sites for the price of one no such luck for me Bottom Line: I joined this site a while back and downloaded all the videos only to be surprised when everything ended up being less than 2 GB. I don't think any other recent site I joined was so small. Most of the scenes are 32x240 and there seem to be no updates past June this year. (I think it's pretty safe to assume this is more or less a dead site) To make things worse the photos are practically useless since there are few of them and there are no zip file, which leaves the poor quality videos. Sadly, as you can imagine from the tiny video size the quality of the content is not the best. Everything seems to be filmed by amateur cameramen who are often the male model as well. Almost all close-ups are too dark to see, there are shaky scenes when the camera is handheld and the cumshots are almost always badly framed, sometimes to the point where the action is off screen and you just see the back of the girl's head. The content of the scenes itself seems to fall into two categories: the scenes with multiple girls which for the most part are fun and the only redeeming part of this site and solo POV scenes which are rather bad. The scenes with multiple girls are usually very interesting because the models are clearly not porn actresses and act more like giggly young adults than anything else. At one point a phone starts ringing and the girls jump up to dance, minutes later a girl does the splits for no good reason. It's like a comedy, but with naked girls and cheering when they finally make out. Overall these scenes look very energetic, random and fun. One video starts in a restaurant, another starts with the girls bathing while wearing ridiculous bathing caps, it's funny and sexy at the same time. Sadly the poor camera work and the small resolution kill these otherwise interesting shots. On the other hand several of the scenes on the site are just a POV scene in a hotel room. Some are okay, with the girl getting really into it, while the majority are more awkward than anything else (some girls look extremely out of it to the point where it gets boring). I understand these are hookers, but damn they could look a bit more interested in the sex... At the end of it all I'd say maybe half the scenes are worth keeping/ unique enough to be interesting. However, you have to put up with shitty resolutions. The navigation of the site is easy (especially since there isn't a lot of content) No sorting, categories or any other special goodies. But you can see the scenes, what the latest updates are and you can get access to the thai coeds site (which didn't work for me half the time, so don't get too excited) I also wanted to mention that almost all of the videos are watermarked asiabootleg.com so maybe joining up with them would be a better deal. In fact their preview page shows a lot of the girls available on this site. Not sure what the deal is there. Overall the bottom line seems to be avoid this site. The poor technical aspects make the few hot scenes a bad value. However, if you really want to see some amateur girls, don't mind small video resolutions and love Asian women this might be interesting. (Although I strongly, strongly feel like other sites could be a much better fit) 09-21-11  04:26pm Replies (0) Review 59 First Anal Date (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 38 videos and around 34 image sets (updates seem to happen more frequently recently.The last few updates are as follows: 15 Oct 2011, 7 oct, 15 sept, 9 sept, 07 aug and april before that ) - Around 25 minutes for each video WMV available as 1920x1080 and around 480x270 - Images are available as zipped archives and look good (anywhere from 50 to 200 per scene) - On average very good looking models and we get oral, vaginal sex and anal in a few different positions (almost all scenes have doggy and reverse cow) The finish is mostly on the girls back although we have a few facials and anal creampies. - Navigation works pretty well and if you hover the mouse over the preview scenes you get to see a few images from the scene (It makes getting an idea of the video you're about to see much easier) - You get access to (I believe all) Pink Visual streaming sites as well as I shoot my girl, they caught on camera and a few more and if you stay with the site longer they give you more sites. Cons: - All the models have different names from other sites making it hard to tell what model you're looking at (I believe they have a few new girls here, but I can't be 100% sure) The lack of a models index makes this even harder. I'd like too see more focus on the models, but maybe that's just me - The scenes tend to have very poor lighting and some of the older ones look closer to amateur porn than something professional. - More search options will become necessary as the site grows. - Pretty huge ads for other sites - A lot of the action is pretty generic Russian porn. There are a few scenes that look really good with the actors getting really into it, but a lot of the girls look bored/ mentally checked out. - All videos save as fulllength-high.wmv, which seems to be a plague of Russian sites. Makes organizing your downloads harder. - I hate that the PinkVisual sites don't allow downloads (I know they are just offering those sites as a bonus, but I love complaining about them :) Bottom Line: I joined this site because I am a "completist" and wanted all scenes with Aspen (who is named Olga or something like that on this site). However, I was surprised at the quality of some scenes here as well as the nice bonuses they offer. The videos, especially the large option look great(honestly don't even bother with the low resolution stuff since the poor light and the 420x resolution will make for a horribly looking movie). They have a lot of good looking models and while the action is not the most diverse, there are a few really good moments here. Some highlights of the models they have are Aspen, Agnessa and Henessy as well as a bunch of other girls I didn't recognize (Vanessa and Lucie are were very adorable). The scenes range a lot in quality with some girls who look like they are drunk or half asleep to some girls that push themselves into the guys cock. I remember one particular scene where the girl is eager to get him in her anus and grabs a bottle of lube herself. It was incredibly hot seeing her lube the dude and force him into her ass. What is also pretty darn cool is that they have a bunch of videos where the girl seems really hesitant to go for the anal sex. For a site that calls itself FIRSTanal date that makes a lot of sense and a level of "realism" that ads a lot to the feel of the site. (Sadly for the most part the girls don't even seem to notice a difference between vaginal and anal sex) Overall, I'd say they come pretty close in type of content to sites like Teenmegavideos or maybe Firstanalquest (Firstanalquest has a lot more stockings and cute outfits, something this site avoids entirely). The big difference, of course, is that firstanaldate only has around 40 scenes so far. Just comparing the number of videos you'd get those other two sites are better deals or even better go to 21sextury or Teencoreclub and get a hell of a lot more content with better light and more variation in outfits/ action. Now don't get me wrong if the site continues to grow at the pace they showed for the past few weeks this will become a hell of a deal. (And if you're like me and need all videos of a certain model this is is also a great deal :) What is nice though is that the site seems to know that it's not offering enough content so they give out a ton of nice bonuses. The Pink Visual network is pretty great (except for their streaming only policy) and if you hang around for 100 days or so you get around 20 bonus sites (of course a bunch are old and don't update anymore but Bang my teen ass, Nasty angels,18 pussy club, I shoot my girl are all nice sites with similar content. Sadly young libertines and casual teen sex don't seem to be available as part of this "stick around get bonus sites" deal) Considering the bonuses offered, the limitations of almost all Russian porn sites (why the hell does everyone have to re-name models? ) and the bonuses this site offers the whole package is not bad, not great, but not as bad as many other sites out there. I still stand by my opinion that 21 sextury or Teencoreclub are miles ahead of this place, but if you're bored with those more mainstream places and love anal scenes this place is not bad. Bottom-line: average, worth checking out if you're a huge fan and looking for new sites to join. 10-15-11  10:31am Replies (3) Review 60 First Anal Quest (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Updated: 08-03-09  02:58pm  (Update History) Reason: I keep confusing young teen, for barely legal, sorry about that. It will not repeat. As I will not post any more links Pros: - as far as teen anal sex this is one of the best out there - many of the shots are hot and the girls look awesome - decent quantity and quality - regular updates with previews of the upcoming update - the bonus section has many full length dvd free for downloading - decent download speeds (around 200kb for four videos at a time) Cons: - a bit pricey for only one website (although the bonus dvd make up for the lack of exclusive material) - if you like story behind your porn, tough luck. All you will get here are sex scenes, not even an interview (most of the time) - some girls look better than others (actually some girls look like they had a lot of anal before) - the male models could be better looking and more into it - the navigation can be a bit annoying until you get used to it, no way to search for model name - all scenes are in a different language (there isn't much dialogue but still a small subtitle could have added to the atmosphere) Bottom Line: If you like teen sex with a bit of pain in the girls faces, instead of the wide asshole type, this is the place for you. The quality of the videos varies a bit but overall this is a place with hot young girls and good scenes. The girls look innocent but ready to do whatever the guy asks them to do (in some other language than English be warned). It is still new and it will certainly improve in the future. Keep an eye out for it. 08-01-09  10:28am Replies (0) Review 61 First Sex Video (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 141 videos (most of which have several options regarding size and quality 720x480 in Wmv format or 640x480 in mpeg as well as mpeg4 ranging from 320x240 to 160x120) - good streaming player - quick and easy download. The size of the max video is between 300 and 600 mb. The speed for me was around 200-300kb when I had four videos going. I used download them all and it worked perfectly. - site is clearly part of a larger network and encourages you to browse the network (the site recommends other scenes from other sites, there is a "Most popular porn star" section underneath the videos. It's very easy to forget why you came to this site and browse around finding videos in other categories. - allows sorting videos based on multiple criteria (anal, amateur, 18-21, pantyhose, etc) as well as most liked, most popular, most viewed, etc. Although this doesn't always work well. - the network has a clear upgrade plan + a timer - some really hot, amateur, hesitant models doing hardc Cons: - the navigation can become frustrating. The options to browse within a site via model are there but the photos can look very deceiving as do the screencaps offered in the main browsing page. Furthermore using the sort feature doesn't work very well since many of the scenes are not rated or not identified correctly (not all 18-21 are shown when this option is selected, for example) - the quality and the action in the videos varies a lot. from scenes where the interview is completely in French to videos dubbed over, to scenes where the girl only has sex with Piere Woodman in a fixed camera angle to scenes taken out of a movie. (which makes the whole exclusive content issue rather hazzy) - the interviews can become boring, especially if they are dubbed (only found 2 so far) also in some videos the first photoshoot where you watch the girl stand still as photos are taken can feel like a behind stages bonus material instead of a real porn movie. - each video saves with a similar name Bottom Line: The website has some issues. Navigation, (despite the many options of searching and browsing) is one. It feels like the creators focused too much on creating a whole network instead of giving each site it's own personality, which can be good or bad. I for one wished they had a browsing page as good as the free tour you get before signing up. Another issue is the non-standard video quality and content. After almost twenty videos downloaded and a few more watched on-line I am not really sure what I'll get. However, so far all videos I saw were very hot, due to the very pretty models and their hesitancy to do shots. It's extremely hot to see a girl threaten to leave because she doesn't want to be interviewed on camera and then moan during an orgasm. However it's also hot to see a girl go from a shy person who barely touches a penis to a foxy vixen in a movie (remember I mentioned there are some videos that incorporate scenes out of movies) If you like amateurs and you like to see how they are convinced to do a shot then this site will do it for you and the minor problems will be easy to ignore (although you will have to go and re-name all videos if you want to remember what they feature, they all save in a similar v0021_full.wmv) However, if you get bored during the regular interviews in a porn shot, you want many, graphic close-ups and you never watch the bonus, behind the scenes material on a dvd...well this site might not be for you. Finally, one more word of advice if you're not certain if you should get this membership or not. Look at the whole network first since the site is very closely connected to the other ones. Make sure you like at least one other website or a few other videos so the deal will be worth it. 08-05-09  07:28am Replies (2) Review 62 Freak Bukkake (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - About 18 videos, although new stuff is supposedly updated monthly (they seem to have an on/off calendar whit some years only having a handful of scenes. - The scenes are in Spanish with subtitles, there is a brief intro/ interview and a massive bukkake. - One huge bonus is that almost all of the girls are laughing and seem to be enjoying the experience without the classic porn moans or the fake "look I'm sexy" look. As far as I can tell this trend is true for most of the network, making this a nice place to visit if you're tired of the classic Playboy looking models. - Some very cute girls, and they talk through the performance joking with the guys and the camera man, a very distinct "feel" from other bukkake or oral sex sites (basically this site is the exact opposite of facial abuse or teencoreclub, the girl seems into it or at least she's making the best out of the situation and everyone is having a good time with no humiliation present) Cons: - For some reason streaming was a bit problematic for me and as noted before download managers didn't work well. I used Download them all the add-on for firefox and that seemed to work fine. - Some of the scenes are focused too much on the guys in my opinion, I remember one video where the camera dude goes interviewing the men, which would be fine and all but some of them were really funky looking and some wear masks (which kinda killed it for me...a man in a pig mask should never be present at a bukkake) - I have the same complaints as mbaya, the photos are pretty much useless, and the updates are way too few. The site has great potential and although there is no penetration the scenes are fun to watch and interesting. Bottom Line: For some reason this site felt like the porn website that Kevin Smith would do... maybe it was the fact that a bunch of the videos are introduced by the chubby camera man/ director; maybe it was the fact that I saw a dude in a star wars mask and another in spiderman get-up...maybe the humor and good-natured feel of the scenes just reminded me too much of Jay and Silent Bob. Overall the whole site just felt "right" the perfect combination of disgusting, hot and weird to make me extremely interested, while never crossing into abuse or humiliation. It was a very different site and I am glad I stumbled unto it, after seeing all sorts of abuse and disgusting cum shots I was certain oral sex in porn wasn't my thing. I usually skip the cum as much as possible, especially since the girl looks uncomfortable waiting for that load, trying to be sexy and not look at the camera too much, however this site proved that you can do good semen related porn. I guess I would have enjoyed more scenes, easier navigation (there are adds for reviews and friendly sites crowding my main page) but overall the network felt decent if you like amateurs and a non-standard kind of porn. Considering the discounted price this was simply a deal too good to pass up (again as long as you like amateur girls that talk during the scene, giggle and sometimes look ridiculous) P.S. The reason the site doesn't get an 80 is because of the few scenes 20 porn videos are really not enough for a modern site, although the network makes up for that I still wanted to see more freak-ish bukkake action :) 10-25-10  07:37pm Replies (0) Review 63 Freaks Of Cock (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - around 150 scenes updated weekly, available for download as WMV or MPG. The newer ones have two resolutions high (740x420) or standard (512x336) The older scenes only offer the standard version. - each scene has photos (can't tell how many as the browsing of photos on the site is rather annoying, but I'd guess around 100 per scene at 850px × 567px) The photos are also available as zipped archives. Also there are some poor quality screen caps. - good looking models and fun dialogue/ interviews. Also the camera work is very good. The little stories are rather amusing as each girl is picked up from a different place/situation. All and all fun scripts. - network access. - gallons of "sperm" and a huge fake penis as well as girls that act all surprised. Measuring the penis compared to various objects is the norm, although no girl takes it all the way inside her (I am not even sure that that would be safe) - one crazy girl that does anal with the huge fake cock Cons: - As on all Porn Pros sites there are ads that can get annoying and loading times for the pages vary from instant to snails pace. - There is a huge fake cock in every scene; a well done fake cock but it's fake (you can tell by looking at the photos or playing the video in slow motion). If that bothers you don't sign up for this network several sites use it (Cock Competition and Cumshot Surprise come to mind) - Don't expect any girl to take that THING inside her all the way...instead the scenes are somewhat more boring with no deepthroating or deep penetrations also only one anal. - download speeds vary a lot from a few kb to a few mb... - Only one male model and he has a lot of personality. If you don't like him you will hate this whole site as he makes faces and comments all the time. He is also the main guy in Cock Competition a very similar site, but with two girls instead of one. Bottom Line: Okay, so first thing is first. This site as well as many others in the Porn Pros network uses fake cocks and fake semen. Yes the cock is fake and no human alive can cum that much without dying of dehydration or something. So what we have here is basically a fancy way to sell dildo action if you want to be really honest. So why bother with this membership? Because this site is something very different from almost anything else I have seen out there. This team doesn't look at porn like 90% of the sites out there. For them porn is all about fun. I always compare the Porn Pros websites to something a bunch of college students would do. It appeals to the frat boy in us. The girls are not made to look glamorous, they resemble girls you would see on a college campus (cheerleaders, sorority girls, etc.) They don't dress in fancy clothes or stockings, and the action is not the material for pin-up magazines or art photography sites. The Porn Pros sites are funny because they are over the top, they have a relaxed atmosphere where everybody jokes around. Yes it's a fake cock but you're already watching two people who don't know each other having sex for money why not take it a step further? Yes it's exaggerated but the girls look good and what guy didn't imagine at least once that he had a humongous boner that would shock some chick? Basically this site is the materialization of your early sexual fantasies, when you wanted to shower the popular girls in your college classes with cum. This site is definitely not your usual porn site and this can disappoint some people while others will love it. With the risk of repeating myself, it's all about what you want from porn. If you're looking for a fun time and a reminder of younger days then this is the site for you. However if you like reality sex or artistic work (not that the fake cock or the camerawork here is not artistic, but I'm talking about MET-art or FTV) this is not really the place for you. You will basically either love it or hate it. I loved it and that might have shifted my opinion slightly but I hope I wasn't too biased and everybody good a good idea about what's up with the PP network. Check it out for a few good laughs if nothing else. 09-16-09  02:22pm Replies (2) Review 64 Fuck Studies (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - The previous two reviews on here say 30 scenes and 50 scenes. Right now they have around 100 and it looks like they are going strong with updates every week. - High quality video as well as images (average images are around 1,440px × 960px or 960px × 1,440px) and video range from around 100x720 for High to 860x480 Medium and 640 or so for low. - Some very cute models and some that I have not seen on other sites. - They all do hardcore and many do anal (In fact for the more recent updates I'd say every girl does anal) - Variation in the scenes and what goes on (I'll detail on this in my final comments) - Always had good download speeds with very impressive spikes (got a 300 mb video in 1 minute) - Support staff was courteous and quick to reply to a feedback e-mail I sent a while back. There is also a forum and administrators respond to the threads almost every time. It's nothing too spectacular, but it's nice to know you can have your opinion heard Cons: - I got this site as part of a Teenmagaworld so I'm not really complaining, but several of the 22 sites they have have not been updated since 2009 or so. The most updated seem to be fuck studies, beauty angels, teen sexmovs, Tricky Masseur and teen sex mania. Although to be honest I am not sure if there are huge differences in regards to the content each site specializes in. Just make sure you join the right site or the whole network so you don't somehow loose access to the currently updating sites. -The 2 say trial is more of a joke than anything. Just trust me on this one, don't bother. Just get the full membership. -A lot of small cosmetic issues nothing bit but...(navigation can be a bit clumsy at times, girls don't have the same name as they do on most sites, making it hard to figure if you know the model before or not. Some of the thumbnails are not revealing at all, some links take you back to the main page instead of where they are supposed to go.) Bottom Line: I have been a member of this network back in the day (I believe 2008 or so) since then the site has grown quite nicely. I remember you used to have to log into each site individually, now there is a very nice overarching network that can take you to all scenes a model has, all recent updates and there is a page that can send you to all the specific content a site has (it's nice to see even old sites got a face lift and for the most part are much easier to navigate) Each scene allows you to stream it (and it works great) post comments on the action (a very nice feature that can be quite useful as other users can identify the model or comment on where else on the net you can find here. ) or download the action in several formats (they don't really tell you the formats, just say high, medium, low, mobile, ipod, but for the most part it's all WMV except for the ipod format which is mp4) Also each scene has a "date added", model age, name and tags of the kind of action she does. Of course everyone seems to be 18 and the names are for the most part messed up (models who are always known by Sasha or Kelsie here are called something else entirely) But nonetheless this feature makes browsing much easier and for the most part things work fine. One of the things that irk me are the fact that you get just one thumbnail unless you enter the set and sometimes that thumbnail can tell you nothing except that there will be a penis and a vagina involved. I'd love it if they would implement the feature a lot of sites seem to have where you can hover the mouse and see a few different images from the movie, or maybe allow you to see a few more sample shots before clicking on a scene. Also I'd love it if instead of 7medium.wmv the scene could save as Valentinamedium.wmv. I know almost none of the Russian sites do this (Teencorenetwork names everything I01 ) but it would be nice. So much for the technical side of the site. It has a few quirks, but it's a huge improvement and I like it a lot more than many other sites. Now to the content itself. Back in the day this network had a few very cute models and a ton of poor quality videos of so-so girls. Nowadays they upped the game and they seem to have solely hot, rather unknown models and they almost all do anal. Also if you get the network membership you are guaranteed to get a few more scenes with the girl on one of the other sites. Overall I am very happy with the quality of the girls they have now as well as the variation between the models. There are some girls who seem to jump on the cock while others are hesitant and have to convinced. It makes for a nice difference in action. Speaking of which I am happy to say that this site does a great job of keeping things fresh. Sometimes the girl will wear stoking for the whole scene, sometimes she is completely naked, sometimes she still wears her top. Sometimes they have vaginal sex, oral then anal, sometimes they go straight for the anal. The male model is sometimes supposed to be the teacher, other times he is another student, sometimes the girl starts fingering herself before he shows up, other times the guy seduces her. Basically what I'm saying is that each scene is different and you never know what you'll get. One other interesting bit was that some scenes have subtitles. You're not missing much as the dialogue is usually along the lines of: "But you're my teacher, I can't have sex with you...okay, put it in my but" but it's an interesting work-around for the non-english speaking girls. I'd like to see some backstage interviews or something like that, but I guess you can't have it all. Overall the network reminds me more of 21sextury than anything else, but they don't put a lot of make up on girls and don't have the lesbian focus some of the 21sextury sites do. So maybe a combination of the action from Firstanalquest (there is a lot of anal here) and the network and support from 21sextury is the best description. I hope they keep up the good work as they can easily become the best Russian teen site around. 09-06-11  09:57am Replies (0) Review 65 Fuck You Paul (0) 55.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 20 video scenes and 16 photo sets. The videos are available in a range of sizes/ quality from 1920x1080 to ipod format,the images are also available in multiple formats and look very good. - Some interesting bonuses (a few interactive games, a flash viewer for the images, good streaming options, a few different language options) - You get network access to several similar websites. - All videos feature Mel a pretty cute, punk-ish looking girl with a nice body. She gets naked, plays a bit with herself and even plays a bit with a friend (Rain, who is not as hot as Mel, but still...) - A lot of different outfits/ locations and overall a nice variation of videos (although everything is softcore) - Good download speeds, no problems navigating the site. - Somewhat interesting approach with the whole boyfriend left me now I'm taking revenge approach. The descriptions to the scenes are funny and the whole feel of the site is interesting. Cons: - Last update on April 12, 2010 and while they have a page which promises future updates I doubt we'll actually see them. - Everything on the site is extremely softcore to the point where it's disappointing. Although there is another girl in some scenes the two never really do much together. (I think nipple licking is the most action we get to see) - Although the site is a solo site they don't go the extra mile to have you interact with the girl. All the scenes have music over the actual sounds (so you don't even hear her laugh or moan), no interviews, no behind the scenes, no member forum and the promised webcam gives a message of : No webcam yet guys!! leave me messages on the blog!!! xoxo - The blog mentioned above doesn't work. -The rest of the network also doesn't have a plethora of videos and images and while I didn't check every site most seem to have stopped updating around April 2010 as well. - No overarching network access (have to log into each site on its own) Bottom Line: At first this site and the supporting network looks great. A bunch of solo sites focused on glamor shots and lesbian action, what's not to like? Even better, the site design is sleek and works nicely. You can easily find all the downloads, you can stream all the videos without issues and the large resolution photos look great and are available as zipped archives. Sadly there are two big problems (and they are huge). Most, if not all of the sites of this network seem dead and to make things worse most of them seem to have around 20 scenes. This makes the whole network around 100 videos, which simply doesn't justify the cost. No matter how high quality your content is if you're only offering a handful of videos you can't justify 40 bucks per month. At least if they had some more bonuses, like a few webcam chats or behind the scenes videos, really anything that could help create a connection to the model that is supposed to sell the site. As it stands right now the biggest bonus the site offers is a few old- fashioned flash games (poker, blackjack) with naked photos of Mel. Basically content that doesn't really help sell the solo site. Now don't get me wrong all the girls they have on this network are cute and Mel is absolutely adorable. She has a great body, gorgeous eyes and I really seeing her in a thong, but there is simply not enough here to justify a purchase. To make things even worse the content on the site is not even that interesting. When I was reading the preview page I kinda hoped Mel would be a tad bit more hardcore than she actually is. I feel that if you say "and I can’t deny I’ve fucked some members also hehehe" you have to deliver at least some masturbation scenes with a toy. This site is probably even less hardcore than Met-art, no scratch that it's less hardcore than an Abercrombie catalog. You never really see Mel's vagina or her playing with herself. While she has a different outfit in every scene and there are a lot of stockings and heels it's simply not enough. I'm not saying I demand brutal anal sex and gagging, but I kinda wanted more than 20 stripping scenes. I swear I saw more intense action in romance movies. So, let me recap this quickly: around 20 scenes on a site that didn't update since 2010, only has at most two girls ( maybe ~4 scenes have two girls, the rest are solo) and those girls don't do anything more interesting than licking each others nipples very briefly. In fact there is a scene where the girls play with puppies. I have no clue who would want to see two topless girls with puppies but I for one was disappointed. Overall a well built website which seems to have started very promising and was abandoned. Visit Nubiles, Met-Art or any of the multiple young adult sites around the net for a much richer experience. P.S. Only gave it 55 since the design of the site worked well and Mel is very cute. 09-30-11  05:04pm Replies (0) Review 66 Fucked Hard 18 (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - around 104 scenes and there are weekly updates. The site having a very nice calendar that lets you see when the update is coming and what it contains. - around 104 photos of very nice quality (older ones are around 900 x 600 and newer ones are around 1500x1204) the photos are taken during the shot and the girl doesn't always pose for the camera (there are a few closed eyes and funky looks, but there are usually over 400 images per scene) - In my opinion some gorgeous models, look at Sandy one of my favorites or Jamie. The girls look cute and their bodies are gorgeous (someone mentioned the plastic-y boobs, yes some of the models have fake boobs but most don't, the oil and post production makes some models looks a bit glossy, like a playboy image but for me that made the whole site better.) - 8 bonus streaming sites focused on teens - no problems downloading or streaming, everything was smooth for me - the whole massage idea makes for a new take on porn. Nice! Cons: - the search function on the site is a bit disappointing as the categories don't always work. Right now that isn't a big problem as there are only 104 scenes but as the site grows it might become a hassle. - right now the site is a bit empty and more videos/more bonus features would be nice. Also there are no DP or anal scenes as far as I could tell. We do have some nice facials and a creampie or two. - some of the videos can get repetitive and there is no reason why the girls pretend that they are in a real massage saloon. They should just go ahead and admit this is a porn, take a more realistic approach IMO. No toys, no anal or group sex could make it boring for some. - some of the photos are not as hot as they could be due to lack of girls posing. - making more of a show out of the girls stripping would be nice, it feels a bit rushed right now. Bottom Line: This site is like revisiting the first playboy you ever saw. The girls are simply hot, nice large breasts, round butts all oiled down and perfectly smooth. There is none of the nonsense from other sites, no sybians or double anal penetrations, no humiliating the girls or squirting (although a few of the girls do cum or pretend tp very realistically) This is a site about fucking hot, young girls, nothing more, nothing less. This can be a bit strange for someone who visits large networks and is used to seeing everything from mature to lesbian anal dildoing with one password, but you know what this site works. The videos turn you on and they often feel more like making love than getting that down n' dirty feel of most porn sites. This is the kind of porn site you could watch with your wife/ girlfriend before a passionate night of sex. Now of course the site is not perfect and the search could use some work, the scenes could be a bot more diverse and I would appreciate a more realistic approach instead of the whole "mom sent me to get a massage" spiel. However, they are adding videos quickly and expanding very nicely. I will certainly keep my membership here for a while. Bottom line: wholeheartedly recommended for those times you feel like watching sex, not the messed up internet porn most sites have. 01-13-10  12:25pm Replies (4) Review 67 Gag Factor (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Many, many scenes. I lost track of count around 200, but they probably have more. The site started uploading on August 20, 2003 and doesn't seem to have missed a month yet, with several months having multiple scenes uploaded. September and August this year have 3 scenes each so hopefully they'll get up to weekly updates. - Some gorgeous girls (Chastity Lynn, Nicole Ray, Capri Anderson) along a bunch more girls I didn't recognize, and a few very nice behind the scenes videos - Videos from 2008 onwards are available in 640x340 WMV. Images are available as 750px × 500px, but no zipped archives and there are only around 50 or so per scene. The site is clearly focused on video. - Access to Americanbukkake.com, OverStuffedHoles.com, GhettoSwarm.com & HardcoreFuckMachines.com - Some of the most intense deep throat action out there. They focus on getting the girls covered in semen and spit and face fuck them intensely. A lot of very nice variation in videos, content and models. Cons: - Older videos are only available as 320x240. - Images are pretty hard to download and are not as detailed as the videos(some are just the girl striping then a few shots of the ending). - The site's navigation need a serious face lift. Right now it's just one long page with all the scenes presented with one thumbnail and the models name. There are some lesbian scenes, but no way to find them, no way to sort by model or type of action in the scene. - The scenes feel a bit to short with some clocking under 8 minutes (The one with Chastity Lynn is literally just a guy walking in, fucking her mouth for 7 minutes and fade-out). I understand it's just a more intense BJ, but I'd like an interview with each model, maybe a bit of stripping, something to add a bit more fore-play to the scene (that way if you want just the action you can always fast forward. ) Bottom Line: As both previous reviews on here mention, most of the content here is also available on DVD's and especially for older stuff that is probably a better option as the 320x240 resolution is not that good. That being said, I still found this network a good value. First of all I have to say that I loved the videos, they are intense and fun with all the girls seeming to enjoy the scene or at least tolerate it fairly well. The compassion with Facialabuse is inevitable and I found the scenes here just as intense with great deep- throating spiting and cumshots, however for the most part the models here seem to have a much better time and the cameraman doesn't insult them/ treat them as sluts. This site feels a lot like good old video porn if you remember stuff from around the 2000 when it was all about a few well known stars who would do over the top, fun and ridiculous porn. Notice how above I said "for the most part" because the older videos are a bit more similar to the facialabuse model. The male model walks in, sometimes slaps the girl or calls her a cock-hungry slut then facefucks her. That is the older stuff, almost everything since 2008 is either a brief interview followed by a hardcore BJ or a small scene with maybe a minute of set-up before the BJ. Either-way, everything feels over the top and fun, giving the site a nice vibe (with no excessive vomit, name calling, confused looking amateurs or abuse) I also really enjoyed their choice of models, with a lot of good looking girls getting their faces covered in spit ans semen. There is tons of ruined make-up, choking and swallowing and this site probably has some of the most intense deep throat for many well known models. Furthermore, there are a ton of cool outfits, stockings, corsets as well as high heels and cute skirts. Overall a nice variation in locations, outfits, models and types of scenes. Another nice feature are the Behind the scenes videos and I only wish they were longer. They capture some great moments with the girls, including candid interviews and little mistakes. Overall some of the best behind the scenes videos I've seen in a long while (I remember one particular scene where the girl is telling the cameraman how she is engaged to the male model and wants to plan the wedding when the guy just walks in, pushes her back and starts fucking her mouth. Priceless stuff.). Now a big downside is that each scene is just a blow job, no stripping, the girl doesn't masturbate or fool around. They get to the blow job pretty quick, which on one hand makes the site feel less like just another porn site and more unique (No BS, just blow jobs here). On the other hand it's hard to feel like you're getting your money's worth when you don't even get some good views of the girls vagina. In fact there are some scenes where the girl keeps her clothes on the whole time. I wasn't expecting sex (although that would be nice) but at least a bit more than a face fuck would be cool. Of course better quality videos would be great. Zipped archives of the images are a must and a better site design is needed (Also more of a description of each scene on the preview page would be nice, right now we get the model name, the date it was added and one single thumbnail that is not very representative). So overall the site has some serious flaws and it feels like whoever designed this was way more concerned with getting cool videos than having a good webdesign, but the scenes make up for these issues and considering how much fun they are I'd say a month membership is not a bad deal. (Did I mention they have a scene with a girl in mime make-up? How can you say no to a site that has a girl in mime make-up? :) Even more, the bonus sites are a nice value with a lot more good looking models in pretty hardcore action. So the bottom line: If you like blowjobs, fun scenes and don't mind seeing mostly well known pornstars this site is for you. However, if you want more than intense blow jobs and need HD scenes you should probably look somewhere else (Facialabuse, Teencoreclub, Gagngape are all a good alternative choice.). 10-01-11  10:20pm Replies (1) Review 68 Gag N Gape (0) 70.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: -young girls doing hardcore -no download limits -straight to action Cons: -some videos are poor quality -navigation can be a bit annoying -the girls often look like they're not into it at all. I actually had to stop one video because I felt sorry for the girl involved. -no English, no story, just action (this can be good or bad) -girls look much better in the preview than in the actual videos (all sites do this more or less but this whole network is a bit decieving) Bottom Line: If you like teens doing hardcore get the Teenmega world pass which includes this site, but be warned that it might be a bit to "real" for your tastes. At times I left the sites wondering why the heck are these girls in porn if they look like they hate it. 08-01-09  09:54am Replies (0) Review 69 Girls Got Cream (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Updated: 08-14-09  05:33am  (Update History) Reason: Expanded on previous review. Pros: - Around 150 scenes both videos (640 x 480 Wmv) and photos (around 400-500 images per scene in either 853px × 1280px or 1280px × 853px. No Zipped photo files) - No download restrictions and videos went down with around 500kb-1mb when getting four of them. However this made navigating the site virtually impossible. - Very hot teens that most often have a very innocent look. This network's biggest asset are clearly the models, who are incredibly hot and act very adorable in most scenes (they seem uncomfortable at first and smile shyly as they strip, but then they become really passionate. Also the way they look towards the camera at times is a killer...at least for me :) - Some variations as some models do only vaginal cream-pie and other do anal cream-pies. - Good camerawork and nice photos (the lighting, different angles and overall technical quality of the content is superior in my opinion) Cons: - The videos don't have any story or interviews, just sex. Also the models don't have any real back story. All we get to know is a name and age. Which is rather disappointing. - Can get a bit repetitive, although the anal or vaginal ending makes a nice difference. I'd like to see more male models though. - More updates would be nice. The whole network is rather hazy on their update schedule and I couldn't find when they plan a new addition to their content. This lack of care for the user is in fact something that bothered me about the whole network. They could really work on their features (such as more search options) and better communication with the users. - All videos download with the same name! It may seem like a small detail but it drove me insane. I ad to go back and manually re-name each video, before burning it on DVD's. It took me twice as long as it should have. Bottom Line: Overall this is my favorite Teen Core Club site. The whole network has some of the best looking European teenagers around and while other sites have some of the models I am convinced Teen Core Club get's them first. their content is exclusive and well done. There is nothing better than the way these girls act when they have anal sex or when they get undressed for the first time. However, the site and indeed the whole network needs to learn how to showcase their models more. They have great girls who look absolutely adorable yet they refuse to give us an option to see all of the girls scenes (you have to manually look for a model if you really like her.) Also there are no bios or interviews or even some brief behind the scenes bonus materials. (I'd love to see something like that). I cannot understand why the webmasters don't put in the extra effort and turn this into a unique site. They have the material why not really showcase it? And why not make the users feel welcomed and catered to? It's little details that could be changed such as maybe making even the older videos available as on single download instead of the 7 or 8 parts. Or making each video have it's own name, or shooting just 10 more minutes of material where they ask the girls a few questions, or show them getting ready for the scene, showing their emotions. It's obvious most girls are really nervous when shooting why not exploit this and make the site even hotter? Sigh...maybe if enough people will talk to the webmasters, they will finally do something. Until then this remains a good site with very, very hot models that had the potential of being the best hardcore teenage site. I really enjoyed it (as reflected by the high grade) but many others might find it too repetitive and without enough user friendly features. I recommend carefully studying the whole network and thinking of what your priorities for a site are if anything besides cute models doing hardcore comes in first place...consider another site 08-02-09  05:40am Replies (0) Review 70 Hardcore Gang Bang (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Actively updated (about 2 scenes per month with around 220 scenes available now in different resolutions from 1280x720 to 512x288 for the mobile version) - Each scene has some photos in zipped folders (1200x800 usually) Most scenes have "glamour" shots and action shots. - Mobile experience is great, the site looks the same as the full version. - Some of the fastest servers I've seen. Videos download very fast. - Even older scenes have multiple resolution and photos in ZIP files. - Different types of scenes with interesting set-up and diverse locations (Everything from doctor themed scenes to anime to bondage and a bunch of dungeons/ alleys etc.) - Each video has a nice intro and outro interview where the actress explains she is alright with the rough scene. - Many actresses return so you can see them in different scenes dressed up differently, a lot of american actresses and one of the few US sites that does rape fantasies, fisting, double anal and double vaginal. Cons: - A bit too many ads for my taste. Other sites at the bottom of the screen and videos for partner sites (Assylum and Evilangel to name a few) are mixed in with other videos in a few sections. - The photos are often just screenshots from the video. I wish they had dedicated photography. I also wish the glamour shots were more than a handful images of all actors, male included. Overall not a great site for photo lovers. - Some of the scenes can feel a bit odd, here is a great actress doing DP, but every male is wearing a Trump mask or the scene is horror themed, or they put clothespins over all her body-parts. Also almost every scene has a BDSM twist (there will be a guy in a mask or a leather harness or some kind of dungeon/ grimy feel) - On some of the lower resolution videos the frame-rate seems a bit choppy(this may be my PC, or the intense action, but I ended up downloading only HD video) Bottom Line: If you know what you're signing up for the site is one of the best in it's class. Where else will you see Princess Peach have rough sex with 5 "wolves"? or a D&D session that turns into a gang bang or a hell raiser fisting porn parody. All scenes, as far as I can tell, involve anal, most involve DP and they have around 30 or so double anal and about as many double vaginal scenes. Also all scenes involve some amount of gagging, name calling some spitting and just general roughness. It can be pretty hot to see the girls loose their make-up during the scene and look pretty bewildered by the whole experience then debrief in the exit interview and explain what they enjoyed. That being said there are some drawbacks: The sites could be a bit better laid out and have a more modern design, hovering over the scenes starts playing photos which sometimes can be the wrong size, there is no easy way to filter by tags and restrict the search to one site, and looking up models sometimes brings up partner videos. Some scenarios can be a turn off if you're not into the BDSM dungeon feel (although more recent scenes are doing parodies of pop culture) and some male actors could be better, but overall the actresses are top notch and doing some of the most intense action imaginable. There are small things I wish were better, but overall, especially once they decided to include the entire network in the price this is a great buy for any fans of intense sex. 04-10-17  07:58pm Replies (1) Review 71 Hardcore Youth (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Cute models in hardcore action almost all of them do deep throat, anal and pretty rough sex/ dildo fucking. - Around 16 video sets each one in pretty decent high quality 960x540 wmv, but only that option is available for download - Very cute girls, this network always manages to get the cutest girls and that is really their biggest draw. I keep coming back again and again, despite the shitty navigation, the poor support and the somewhat repetitive style of the scenes (which they are starting to change by the way, the newest scenes in the network actually feature a very, very cute stripping scene and a little bit of dialogue with the girl) -Never had problems downloading from them Cons: - All the drawbacks of the teencorenetwork, such as: -poor navigation, yes you can get around but there is no search, there are no model pages, there is no master page log-in so you have to go to each site in the network separately. -a lot of the scenes feel a bit repetitive, but I think the newer videos and this site are meant to change that. Here every scene features different clothing and a tiny bit of a story. I think it's the first time I have seen them have the girls wear stockings for a scene. -the site itself is very similar to the whole network and I simply don't understand why they don't update the older sites instead of constantly making new ones. - no real update info. The teencoreclub network page tells you new videos are up, but no info on what is coming next -all videos save as i0.wmv so have fun re-naming them -no zips for images (they have very nice images but no way to get them down grrr) -no streaming Bottom Line: This whole network has a great advantage the models. They have, hands down the best looking teenage girls doing hardcore. These girls are so incredibly hot it's not fair. Almost each one is "too cute to be in porn" and then they go ahead and do annal and DP and deep throat. Look for Aspen, or Payton, or Coral or or or... They have literally hundreds of young very hot girls who don't appear anywhere else. Now that we covered the big bonus, everything else is mediocre at best. The navigation is barely there you get 2 scenes per page and have a menu that takes you one page further. Basically exactly what you see in the page tours, no master page that let's you search all sites, no model pages, no search for a certain kind of action, nothing. Another big problem is the lack of zipped image files. You'd have to literally sit there and download each image by hand as they don't really have a decent image slide-show on the site. No streaming, no mpg, mp4 video files. No options when it comes to downloading a video and at times the sites can be a bit slow. Never ever download more than 4 videos at a time and try to navigate the site. Even more interesting the whole network keeps making new sites, but stops updating the old ones. I have no clue why, but right now the only actively updated sites are this one, youngthroats, the dp one, ass to mouth, try teens and I believe the teens try blacks and girls got cream. Why not just make one site and update it with the thousands of videos they have spread out through the whole network? No clue. Anyhow, think of this like a drop dead gorgeous girl that will do anything you want as long as you also sleep with her hideous fat friend. (in that metaphor the fat friend is the site and the drop dead gorgeous girl are the drop dead gorgeous models that the site has :) 100 points for the girls, -20 for everything else, but it's worth it. Trust me it's very much worth it. 07-31-10  11:26am Replies (5) Review 72 HD Porn Pass (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge amount of content. Around 2056 image sets with around 200-300 photos each at around 1066px × 1600px or 680px × 1024px also around 1800 videos available as Wmv or quicktime at 380x210 or 1280x720 (which makes the video look awesome. Crystal Clear). The content is spread over 21 sites such as (anal hell, teens kissing and India uncovered) - Bonus access to a bunch of other websites of solo girls as well as 7 or 8 hardcore sites including her first anal, which I visited more often then the main content.... - The streaming works fine and was surprisingly fast. - A lot of hot models and good scenes, but don't expect any amateurs. Most of the actors are big names like Hilary Scott or James Dean. - Quite a lot of hot scenes and some anal and squirting is in there too. Sadly you have to dig to find it as there is no easy content-related navigation. Cons: - Navigation is a bit slow. With four videos downloading I had trouble loading the preview photos. Also as soon as you select a video it starts streaming instead of allowing you to select what you want to happen. Just a bit frustrating, nothing too major. - Many videos are cut into two or three parts and you can't access all of them at the same time (they are each considered their own separate video instead of being part of a bigger one) This is probably a way for them to produce more content out of nothing, so those 1800 videos cut that in half... - Download speeds were very slow for me (under 100kb most of the time) - Many scenes weren't that hot. There is a small back story and then sex, but somehow it just felt average. Maybe I'm getting too old and jaded but I just felt like there was something lacking. This is very subjective though so I won't take any points off. Just be warned that scenes can look a bit too generic on some network sites. Bottom Line: Overall this site was a pleasant surprise. The bonus content was very nice (saved everything I could from Her First Anal) and the amount of content was nice too. The photos looked great (I'm not big into images but even I downloaded a few sets) Also the India Uncovered site was nice. If you like ethnic women this site might be a true gold mine. As for the HD quality...well I'm torn, on one had the videos looked great but I wish there was an option in between 380x210 or 1280x720. Also some more diverse content would have been nice most scenes being too generic for my taste. The back story was boring (a gamer boyfriend get's seduced...wow...how hot; some guy get's a girl a rose and bones her...wow..how original) Again this is very subjective though so maybe others will enjoy the scenes more... The navigation could have been better and overall the download options weren't satisfying (no zips for photo sets and poor quality for quicktime movies). So my conclusion? This is a good network with at least two, three interesting sites. The videos download fast despite slow speeds(because they are so small (50 mb each or 200 mb for the high quality stuff) There are some cute girls and some nice scenes but you have to look a bit too hard for them. In the end the best description is that this network "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend." 08-29-09  05:03pm Replies (0) Review 73 Holed (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - All glamour anal videos so you know right off the bat what you're getting here - Well shot scenes with a lot of close-ups and focus on the girls - All gorgeous models you'd expect from a modern site (Megan Rain, Haley Reed,Holly Hendrix) - 3 updates per month and videos come in 4k quality - All scenes have photos in zipped archives - Videos download pretty fast (for me 3gb would come down in about 12 min) - Scenes also have screencaps, but they are not available in zipped archives - A lot of good discounts (I got it for 10 bucks which is more than fair for the amount of scenes you get) Cons: - Search options are still pretty basic (no option to search for blonde girls for example and the search field doesn't work well for this) - A lot of ads for cam sites and upgrading the membership to the network - Video & pic file names are all named "gallery" and "mp4_1080_18" (or whatever resolution you picked) You'll have to go back and rename things. - Action can get a bit repetitive, a lot of boy-girl anal and maybe a handful of bgg, but that's about it. Bottom Line: Let me start with a bit of an odd nitpick: As other reviews pointed out each video has a short intro and when you download it the scene has a generic name, this means that I ended up with like 20 videos named the same and with the same thumbnail, not a deal breaker but just a small annoying thing that could have been easily solved. Second nitpick is the navigation, I wish the search box let me search for all anal videos on the network or let me select all scenes that are more BDSM themed or all scenes with 2 girls, instead you can only search by girl, release date and most popular. Finally there are more ads that I'd like, at the top you have self-playing live cam ads, at the bottom of each scene you have links to other scenes with the girl in the network (which is great if you have the whole network, but otherwise it's annoying) and when I was logging in I kept getting ads to upgrade to their network. All of that said, this is a decent site if you like anal videos, it feels a bit like they are trying to chase the success of Tushy and I would recommend that site over this one, but if you already checked out Tushy and HardX this is a nice alternative of more anal scenes in a similar style. 11-10-18  04:31pm Replies (3) Review 74 Hookup Hotshot (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Not the easiest site to total all the scenes but I'd say around 180-190 scenes with updates coming weekly. There's also a section letting subscribers know what the next scenes will be. That said be aware that this includes a decent amount of BTS videos. There's about 165 models with some shooting 2 scenes - Great models. Most of the well known young looking models in the last few years have a scene here (Piper Perri, Charlotte Sartre, Anya Olsen, Megan Rain etc.) - Huge props for not trying to upsell you, also the banner ads are minimal. The site is focused on the content it offers, not trying to trick users into buying another subscription. - Pretty unique content with a focus on playing out a domination scene. Several of the girls really seem to go into sub space and it's pretty hot how far they are willing to go. The behind the scenes videos are also some of the best I've seen. Highly recommend checking them out. - Some nice photos that are available as zip archive. Cons: - The site is certainly not for everyone. Take a good look at the preview pages (which are pretty great at giving a good idea about what kind of models and what kind of action is here). The models are all in the teen category with one or two exceptions, the makeup is pretty over the top, the outfits are an odd mix of belts and loops and the action is pretty rough domination stuff, with the fan base asking for even more puking, rimming and pee. Some of it works for me, some is a bit too much, but to each their own. - You get 20 video downloads per month (no limit on photos) for the first 3 months. BUT the price for the site is $20 per month. I'd say just buy the 3 month subscription if you really want to download everything. - A decent portion of the videos are also on Evil Angel, so if you're really on the fence that network is probably more bang for your buck. - Technically speaking the site is a bit outdated. I appreciate the clean design, but better navigation would be nice. Bottom Line: I first stumbled upon Bryan Gozzling through Evil Angel. They must have some kind of sharing contract because around 140 of his videos are also hosted on their network. Usually getting updated after they've been up on his site for a few weeks. That said, several of the shared scenes have been edited in some way. The scene with Megan Rain for example is around 55 minutes on Evil Angel but an incredible 2 hours on the Hotshot site. Evil Angel cut out several anal angles and a portion where he gives Megan an enema with some blue liquid (which makes no sense since the video is titled "Enema Leads To Manhandling Sodomy", but whatever not going to get into critiquing porn titles). Lola Fae's scene is about 30 minutes shorter, both Pepper Hart scenes are about 20 minutes shorter (because they cut out any reference to pee) and so on. It's not always the case but I'd say maybe half the videos have a few minutes shaved here and there. The other videos that are exclusive to this site are the behind the scenes, and these are some awesome videos that go through choosing the girl's outfit, posing for photos as well as a pre-scene and post-scene interview. It's great content that really highlights the girls and shows how Bryan prepares a scene (they are almost all 1 hour of content). Considering how intense some of the content gets it's also really nice to see the post scene interview where the girls are happy to go over what they enjoyed and confirm everything was consensual. In my opinion every site with rough sex should have these kind of post scene check-in videos to remind everyone this is a fantasy. And it is a pretty specific fantasy: each video plays on the idea that a young girl wants to be dominated and have rough sex so they go on the Hot Shot Hook Up site to find a guy they can call "daddy". From there almost all scenes go through Bryan presenting the girl, fingering her (often to squirting), a really sloppy blowjob and pretty rough sex in several positions. There's rimming, a lot of anal scenes, some pee scenes, some puking, a lot of "yes daddy" and "thank you sir". A lot of it works because the female models really seem to get into it and go with the flow, but as I said it's not for everyone and this is for sure not the typical stuff you'd find on every other porn network. To be perfectly honest the whole daddy talk and male rimming was not my cup of tea and I do wish there were more older models and maybe more BDSM focus (just say "sir" or "master" instead of "daddy" and I'd be much happier), but like every site that is one person's vision it's never going to be 100% what everyone wants so I'll take what I can get. Also keep in mind this whole operation is run by a small crew, the location is always the same, the male actor is always Bryan, it's pretty much all boy-girl scenes. The small scale of the operation also shows in the site itself. At one point the download photos button got shifted under the images and I couldn't click it anymore. They have a 20 video download limit so people don't hammer their servers then disappear after a month, the photos (while great) are taken during the sex so sometimes they are not the best angle. Small gripes that overall don't really detract much from the score if the content and models seem interesting to you. 12-19-18  09:55pm Replies (4) Review 75 Hot Hairy Honies (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 160 scenes with a somewhat erratic update schedule but it looks like generally they get around 2 scenes up per month. The club 69 network gets an update almost daily though. - As far as I could tell all exclusive content, a lot of interracial sex with a black male model and mostly European models (some French some Russian good mix) - All scenes have images but no zip and the quality is only medium (around 525px × 700) They do offer a slideshow option on the site that works moderately well. - The site does deliver on the hairy promise, all models look very natural - A mix of models, some mature women, some more overweight girls and several skinny young looking girls. Overall the site seems focused on natural looking women, pretty minimal make-up, not the most flattering light, and pretty standard action - A lot of stockings, high heels and corsets. - Good download speeds, no log-outs, no issues streaming content. Cons: - All videos are only 640x400 resolution, with some less than ideal camera angles (they seem to really like to film stuff sideways here) and rather basic light. - No real search options. While they provide a search bar looking even for basic stuff like mature or BBW doesn't return anything. They really need a better tagging or content filtering system. - While it's nice to see a mix of natural looking women, the site is too disorganized. There are 18 yo looking girls as well as very mature MILFS on the same page. It's hard to find the kind of model you're in the mood for. - Almost all scenes have b/g sex, no anal, no group sex, very little solo or lesbian action. Some older scenes have a bit of a story to them while recent ones are pretty much just gonzo sex that can get a bit boring. Bottom Line: I joined this site not really because of the hairy aspect as much because of the promise of pretty spectacular creampies and extensive use of corsets and stockings on natural almost amateur looking girls. On both accounts the site delivers pretty well. All scenes I looked at ended with a creampie or the guy cumming oh her vagina, a nice change to the pretty standard facial at the end of most porn clips. Also the vast majority of scenes start with the girls in some sort of corset/ bodystocking and a lot of them keep it on the entire time, making for some pretty hot, almost clothed sex scenes. That being said the technical quality of the videos killed the mood for me. You only get one download option as wmv at 640x400 or you can stream the same quality scene as a flash movie. Even worse the scenes are often not lighted well so you get very dark zoom on the woman's vagina, considering all the girls are hairy/ natural looking and the male model is often black good luck seeing what is going on in the dim lights. Another disappointment was the lack of a good search option. There is no real way to separate the younger looking models from the older ones. There is no way to select only the handful of lesbian scenes and good luck finding all scenes where the girl does deep-throat. One telling aspect about the site's technical quality is the fact that the copyright at the bottom of the pages say "materials are © 2009" which is probably the last year the websites were updated. Bad webdesign, bad video quality, but decent looking models (if you like natural/ amateur looking girls) and pretty okay action. The one reason I say pretty okay action despite the good cumshots and outfits is that oftentimes the camera work is bizzare. They focus too much on close-ups with several scenes not even showing the girls face until 4-5 minutes into the scene. There are also a lot of strange cuts, one moment she is giving the guy head, the next they are having sex, no transition just a rather strange jump. Add to this tons of side angles and you have some rather odd video choices. To make things a bit more complicated there are several scenes where this doesn't really apply, the lights are better and the angles less extreme, leading me to believe that they get the content from several directors. However there is no way to tell what is what. Better content tags would have really been helpful here. The bottomline is that I enjoyed about 30% of the content on the site and the rest of the network did offer some nice action with mature women, but overall the experience was rather disappointing. Higher resolutions and a more modern web design are absolutely necessary for this site, until they make these changes I'd only recommend this to hardcore fans of natural looking women. 05-28-12  01:47pm Replies (0) Shown : 51-75 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.41 seconds.