| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
ALS Scan
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The best quality hardcore solo porn site in the web.
- Photo updates past 2 years come in 2 resolutions of 1400x1000 and high 3500x2000 pixels. Excellent photography.
- Excellent video quality most recent updates HD quality. Owner takes pains to improve the quality of the older videos some taken as back as late '90s.
- Tons of material up.
- All shaved but otherwise natural models. All natural breasts and bodies.
- Updates 7 days a week. Photo and video updates on weekdays. One video update each on the weekends.
- Very Attractive Models.
- Includes glamour shots advancing to hardcore solo poses and all sorts of penetrations which include toys, cucumbers, bananas, small bottles, tongs, fisting, speculum, their special 'als rocket' and peeing.
- Behind the scenes uncut video of the photo shoot which shows models true personality. |
| Cons: |
Very few cons.
- Many masturbation videos have a fake, forced feeling to it. Not as natural and laid back as their behind the scenes videos. (Might appeal to some)
- Some of the behind the scenes videos they focus on too much close up of the vagina instead of the whole body and face. The model and the photographer will be busy talking but you get to see only the vagina for maybe 2-3 minutes. (Might appeal to some)
- Older photo update before 2001 not of the best quality.
- Daily photo updates have only part of the photoset but the director of the website states that this is going to change to complete updates soon instead of breaking each scene into parts. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has been there since 1997 and I have been a member since 2003. I have experimented with lots of other porn sites and very few compare to the quality and solo hardcore nature of this website.
Director who calls himself Alex takes pains to keep the quality. He gives us details of models and happenings in his interesting blog. He responds to most of our e-mails and suggestions personally and promptly despite him being the busy boss. |
|
03-07-08 08:59pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
2
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge collection good looking young women, around 1000 models many posing for first time.
- Updates past 15 months have good quality photos around 1500x900 resolution sharp pictures with no blurring.
- Photos have a natural feel to it with no forced expressions pictures exaggerating the shy and naughty nature of these models.
- Good range of variety of posing (some hardcore) and location in the photo shoots.
- Lots of candid videos of decent quality. |
| Cons: |
- High resolution photos only from 2006. Quality of photos before 2005 not the best.
- More of a photo site. Lots of videos not worth downloading older videos not of good quality.
- A bit too expensive $29 monthly and no really good multimonthly offers. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I was a member back in 2006 this site didn't appeal to me much as the quality of photos and videos were not in par with the times. They used to rely on quantity rather than quality.
The sites have changed for the better recently to such an extend that I feel it is one the best amateur sites in the web quality being even better than the age old similar website Atk galleria. You can make out that the managers of this website have recently become picky choosing very good looking girls and trying to get as many first timers as possible. |
|
03-07-08 09:43pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
3
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The largest collection of a combination of races which include Latinas, Afrocarrabian, Asian, East Indian, Native Indian and Islanders all in one website.
- Around 800 plus models.
- Picture resolution 1500x past 18 months.
- Updates 7 days a week 5-7 photosets daily and 4-5 video updates in WMV and Quicktime format on Sundays. This is why so much content is up.
- Updates since around 2001-02.
- Mixture of variety of content which include mainly solo explicite posing, few lesbian, BG and varied locations.
- Naturual photos. No touch ups. |
| Cons: |
- Models can vary from very good looking to below average.
- Picture quality before 2006 not the best. Older picture dating back to 2001-02 below average quality and a lot taken from pictures released between 1997- 2001 from the sister website amkingdom.
- Quality of pictures vary between different photographers.
- Mainly a picture site not all videos worth downloading and no HD videos. Videos split into parts sometimes have to wait a week or two to get the complete series.
- Sometimes same models are put into different race catagories like one photoset in Latina and another in East Indian, shows that site is not consistant in revealing the model's actual race.
- A little expensive at $30. Multimonthly offers not the best. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are looking for a variety of ethnic races all in one website with huge archive and consistant daily updates then this is for you. Very little to complain about.
I always keep coming back every 2-3 months after cancelling. If only they had better mutimonthly offers I might have been a permanent member for years. |
|
03-13-08 11:36pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
4
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- A solo explicite site with few boy girl scenes.
- Young girls between 18-22.
- Hugh amount of content dating back from 2003 with more than 300 models up.
- Good quality pictures 1600x resolution past 2 years.
- Videos in 3 different formats wmv, avi, mpeg2 and good quality. Even the old videos are of reasonable quality.
- Very frequent updates sometimes 2 updates daily, that is why so much content is up.
- Good website layout. Easy to find what you want.
- Good customer service. Prompt reply to e-mails and resolving issues. |
| Cons: |
Not many cons.
- Many Russian/European are expressionless appear forced, pose as if all they want to do is get the money and run away from there which makes them less erotic.
- Masturbation videos appear fake with many models going on unnecessarily screaming like as if they are having orgasms. Not worth downloading. (May appeal to some)
- Not much variety in model races. Mostly only Caucasian. Hardly any Asian or Afrocarrabian. Variety would be good.
- Price is too high at more than $30 and no good mutimonthly offers.
- Zipfile not have no model names. Make it a piont to rename them when downloading otherwise gets confusing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an excellent quality young girls site with a great deal of decent content. You can make out the manager has taken pains to keep the quality and consistency with updates.
It takes some thinking to really find out any drawbacks with this site except probably that they could give much better multimonthly offers. |
|
03-09-08 09:41am
Replies (1)
|
Review
5
|
Simon Scans
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- British solo hardcore website with mostly girls from UK and Europe.
- Tons of decent quality solo hardcore and few lesbian photos dating from 2000. Close to 500 or more models
- Photo size 1500x900 or larger past 2 years.
- Updates 5 times a week mostly photos and occasionally videos.
- Decent quality videos. Masturbation videos are more authentic then most other websites you can actually see many models getting wet and having a real orgasm. |
| Cons: |
- Some photos are too blurry many a time the photographer blurs the models face completely and you get to see only the genitals. (May appeal to some)
- Manager of the website not picky in choosing models. Some average models that look like they badly need a shower, some look like they have given birth to 5-6 kids.
- Toys, toys and more toys some of them huge in size almost as long as their thighs and as thick as their arms, but they seem to be happily putting them in! Toys can put in as early as the 5th or 6th picture which makes it less erotic.
- Picture opens in new window. (May not be a hassle to some) |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the best British porn sites around, although they have been adding a lot of other European models lately.
Will appeal to ones who love toys. Some models use two to three toys in every orifice possible!! |
|
03-08-08 06:49am
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
88 Square
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Large collection of pictures and videos of Far East Asian, mostly Thai models.
- Over 150 models.
- Frequent updates 3-4 times per week.
- Pictures of decent resolution around 1400x.
- All pictures and most videos are exclusive content.
- Lots of videos, many are well done HD videos of photo shoots which might appeal to some
- Number of Thai and Japanese XXX full length movie downloads. |
| Cons: |
- Some photosets show too much of the genitals and blur the face.
- Occasional airbrushing of photos and too much makeup on models makes some models look alike.
- A bit expensive at more than $30 and no good multimonthly offers.
- Video downloads not fast enough for someone who has a fast broadband connection. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site will appeal to anyone who likes Asian oriental females and solo expicite posing; there are not many good Asian sites around especially as sites like Asian4You closed down and this one serves the craving. Most other Asian sites have lower resolution photos than this site has.
The site is worth giving a go for a month or 2 if you want to satisfy your taste for high quality Asian content. |
|
03-13-08 03:28am
Replies (2)
|
Review
7
|
Earl Miller
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Mainly a porn stars, adult glamour picture oriented website.
- Professional photography by Penthouse's most acclaimed photographer Earlmiller.
- Tons of content back pictures and video from 1999.
- Many well known porn stars like Sunny Leone, Cassidy, Lanny Barbie, Monique Alexander, Adrianna Sage and lots more, more or less started their career doing porn here.
- Behind the scenes of photo shoot videos. (May not appeal to some)
- Photo section of amateur good looking young women as well. |
| Cons: |
- Highest picture quality is 1280x pics. Any picture before 2006 is 1024x pics.
- Airbrushed photos. Many models have a plastic feel to them because of the amount of alteration done to the photos.
- Videos before 2006 of below average quality.
- Past two years updates have erratic. Used to be very consistent with 6 updates per week prior to 2006 but not any more.
- Recycles old content. |
| Bottom Line: |
This was one porn website which was really good 3 years back.
They have gone for the worse. They have done nothing to improve the layout, picture resolution and video quality.
It's almost as if Earlmiller himself is close to retiring.
I have cancelled my membership and have no plans to join again mainly because of the consistency of their updates and recycling old content.
But then again for a person taking membership for the first time here it might be worth it for about a month. You get to see the history of porn stars of the last 8 years where most of them started their career. |
|
03-08-08 08:38pm
Replies (2)
|
