Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Crisp videos - if you want to call anything HD, this may be it.
VMW, DIVX, Ipod and Quicktime.
Some cute/sexy easteuro teens (SOME)
Access to both Just Teen Movie and Just Teen Site |
| Cons: |
Lousy navigation - no idea about updates, unless you've got a very good memory.
Most video-files are way too large (some over 700 MB for 15 minuttes).
Too few videos
High price - even with the co-access.
Lousy video-updates
Repeting log-in |
| Bottom Line: |
As Just Teen Site is among the best in its field when it comes to easteuro-teens (photo-sets and a few videos), why not go for the newer offer from this company:
Just Teen Movie has not had much time (since april 2008), so as you'd suspect a not so large amount of clips.
And you'd be quite right. In april TBP stated 32 (full)videos.
Here in middle august the amount is 42 - call that an honest way of doing updates? I do not think so.
I really liked the idea of Just Teen Site doing a special movie/video-site, but what a bummer.
Do not dream of a great variation of models -like Just Teen Site - it's simply a matter of to few models.
Instead some - not so exiting models (in my humble opinion) are doing three or more videos each - and that does not come to much out of 42.
The videos are crisp, for sure. But using up to more than 700 Mb on a 15-18 minuttes clip is not very professionel in todays standard.
OK: You get DIVX, VMW, iPOD and Quicktime and full scene downloads.Good stream-preview of every clip.
AND: The navigation is worthless - if there is any at all. You're not able to look for either updates, nor models - just go for "more videos" as you taggle along - and you end up comming back to a different start of content (out of line!).
Rediculous price of $34.95.
A comfort here is that you NOW get access to Just Teen Site as well - but where JTS was formerly also a good/medium good video-site - it lacks now. This is not a review of JTS, but I still notice, that this site has not had any video-update since july 16th.
But bottum line:
The score 68 is as mentioned at TBP/PU:
Does more things wrong than right - low recommondation. |
|
08-20-08 06:02am
Replies (12)
|
Review
52
|
Silvia Saint
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Foremost a pretty good network where the one and only doll, Silvia Saint is a part of this netwotk.
Fine price ($14.95) for access to this network which includes pretty good, allround video hc-sites like Devils Film and Silverstone DVD.
Some rare Silvia Saint-stuff which also appears on the site: Club Silvia Saint - but to a higher price. (29.95)
Fine download speed (I got 655 Kb/sec)
A truckload of other movies.
New videos in ok quality: 720x528
Silvia Saint now only does softcore, but it's great videos... |
| Cons: |
A lot of material from bonus-sites like Silverstone and Peter North consists of grained/blurred videos.
Do not go for photos on this one!
Can you believe it: No zip!
Very confusing navigation: The updates is marked almost daily - but you have to look really carefull through all the bonus-sites to find out whats new and whats just "former" update from older movies.
Updates in general: For the Silvia-site: Very rare! No video-update and only two photo-updates in my month of membership (not joining again) |
| Bottom Line: |
For a Silvia Saint-fan this site is just average, but if you're a fanatic it has its values. First I got three new SS-videos (softcore) here for $ 14.95 - and it's worth every penny - for a devoted fan.
All those three videos are just great but are now or will be at the Club Silvia Saint site too.
Still there's a lot of good, older SS-stuff here - if you do not have - or think you have an entire SS-collection: try it here for less.
The SS-site includes several bonus-sites with a lot of fine HC-stuff. Among them some teriffic videos of our old friend: Tera Patrick.
Tera has some newer stuff here with among others an amazing virtual video (POV-like)..WOW...nothing less than great!
The Silverstone-part is HUGH with a trainload of videos - alas, a lot of these videos are not very great in quality: grained! But ok, you'll be able to find some ok-video-quality in the limited newer stuff.
You also get Devils Film which is probably the second best in this package - a large amount of videos - but again: Most of these videos are NOT up to todays standard in crisp viewing:
Most 720x528 - but a lot of difference in quality, still.
The entire network now states that they have about 1270 dvds - won't argue with that - some are ok in general - but too many are of a quality that most PU's probably will not be satisfied with today.
Still: For SS-fans: It's worth the $ 14.95 and there's still a lot of fun browsing around the other sites - you might get lucky. Some fine Latin-stuff, too. |
|
07-24-08 09:36am
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Solo Teen Girls
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a network with some great eastern-european girl, girl/girl and hardcore-videos. (plus specialities in more lousy quality-sites)
Some of the videos are exclusive. (I'd say 2/3)
Fine video-quality: 1280x720 (wmv - only)
Most girls seen before, but some quite rare.
New layout - not the one you see at TBP! |
| Cons: |
Very confusing setup how to join: TBP states some sites (bonus-sites, which is rather importend here) but when your're joining other sites are part of the deal instead.
Online-connection on and off - sometimes no connection (bad)
Photos: Forget it! (1280x856) - but lousy/average quality. (but they got zip, after all)
Could not gain access to bonus sites - waited four days before feedback from webmaster |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has a new and somewhat better layout now - the one at TBP is from the past. When you try the site, skip what's after: http://www.soloteengirls.net at TBP.
The motherload here at soloteengirls consists of approx. 150 solo-girl videos of fine quality.
There are a lot of ways/sizes to download the videos - a big plus for this site:
High quality: (1280x720) Average size: 350-600 Mb.
Medium: Size: 150-300 MB.
Low size: 80-160 Mb.
But there is also a fine divided small clip-download (6 Mb) or stream. Here you get the idea about the video-content before downloding the whole stuff. (A great plus)
The navigation is just OK. When looking for the whole deal, you go for the "Archive". Here you can browse through - now 17 pages whit aproox 10 girls each - where you get info/thumbnails about the girl. There is enough to last ALMOST a month - when you also brows the bonus sites.
Two of those are just ok: Gag-n-Gape and Old-n-Young. The content in the rest of the 23 bonues sites are mostly crap. (quality likewise)
But: Bottom Line: If you're into easteupean girls (solo) this certainly has some potentials.
Is you're more into HC: maybe try: Teen Sex Movs from the same co. (though some of the filming/editing here are a bit "amateurish"). |
|
07-16-08 09:20am
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Totally Teen
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Vast amount of crisp videos with euro-girls/teens and wellknown euro pornstars - some exclusive for the PowerNETX - network (Sextronic). Around 200 fine quality videos in the package with bonus-sites.
A lot more of less (mostly bad) quality videos - none exclusive. (forget them).
Access to - normally 7-8 more sites (it differs which of these PowerNetX-sites you sign up with)
Some - 3-4 socalled bonus sites are good (in the same league)
WMV-videos 1280x720 for the socalled HD-videos. |
| Cons: |
Very slow browsing speed - it's directly anoying - you can drink a whole beer or coke - before the entire site is at place.
Don't go for photos - most lousy quality. (didn't even bother to look for zip)
Terrible navigation and way too slow.
Very confusing when you sign up - it's like a game of chess to find exactly those sites that interests you.
Beware: The sites are entirely different in style than the preview - preview looks great compared to things when you are inside - the layout inside is lousy!
Expensive: $34.95 |
| Bottom Line: |
This is probably the most difficult site or network I ever have come across.
You have to take good looks at a lot (89 sites) of offers from this network. The 18 Passport stated at TBP does not give you top-dollar compared to a choise of most single-sites with bonus-sites.
I looked for euro-teens and euro-stuff generally and ended up choosing Fantastic Cumshots because you get Totally Teen, Czech Sex Club, All Hot Lesbians and Erotic Cinema - which seems to have the best content.
And BTW: All Hot Lesbians has some of the best solo-stuff.
BUT: It's all one big mess - which means you can find most of all the videos in the entire network at all sites - Erotic Cinema seems like the motherload, though.
So: Choose a sites where this EC is included.
BUT: Once on the track there are some VERY fine videos of easteuro/russian teens and pornstars. Some is wellknown at Nubiles, like Natasha, aka Helen (she has her own site) - but here her videos are simply amazing.
All in WMV - and go only for the socalled HD-videos - all in 1280x720 and in just great quality.
Size: 300-500 Mb.
Unlike the browsing speed the download-ditto I got around 600-650 kb/sec with IDM.
In an allround review it's not a great site/network, BUT a lot of the content certainly is if you're into easteuro-teen videos.
So I got to go to a score of 84 - and I saved more than 25 of those videos at my HD.
And can you live with the anoying slow browsing and horrible navigation it's worth a try (steep price, though) |
|
06-29-08 09:35am
Replies (2)
|
Review
55
|
Candice Cardinele
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great looking model - solo site
Exclusive all the way
Ok looking, very new and rare videos of this doll
Ok photosets (small in size, though)
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Small selection even for a solo-site
A bit prizy - not $14.95 as stated at TBP, but 24.95 - at the moment "special price: 19.95
Video-quality COULD be a bit better
No interaction
No zip for "girl-friend"- photosets
Softcore only - no real masturbation - no lez |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this rather small site with a slim amount af content because the girl, Candice Cardinele is a great looking girl.
Followed her for some years where she mainly appears on photosets from Foxes.com - those photosets that is well know for preview on the net - and I think, wellknown for their rather small size, though foxes-photosets have been made in huge amount.
Here at her new own site Candice (under Foxes.com) has complete new stuff:
But: Only 10 videos (again not bad, because the amount of videos with her is slim in general):
WMV and Mov. or stream for both.
Download for full videoclips or parted in three.
Average size: 80-110 Mb, 720x480.
Photosets: 21. (Plus 11 sets of socalled friends - no zip here, strange)
Size only: 850x566 - but still good viewing quality.
If you also think Candice is great there are two ways of preview: At her own site the preview video gives you a pretty good idea. No previews for full size-photos.
At Foxes.com there are two other fine preview videos of Candice - but I never quite figured out the membership-deal with Foxes.com - it looks like you "Buy" one video-download for $9.95 - but maybe other PUs know more about this Foxes.com.
But Bottom Line: Even if the amount is slim this latin-type doll is simply sexy and I spend my $19.95 with pleasure - 'cause I can return to this girl again and again.
Still: No more than a score of 75 - even from a fanatic.
The site needs a lot of improvement.
Had to downgrade.
Way to few updates
No Zip now! |
|
06-07-08 05:20am
Replies (5)
|
Review
56
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality in videos and photosets
Some great looking models - teens of (only) easteuropean origen. A few more average looking teens.
TEENS: sexy outfits: high heels, neglige and nylons (no socks or whatever)
Zip for photos (photos: 1549x1033)
Videos: AVI only (576x320) - but crisp! (full screen)
Updates looks ok for now - very new site
Updates seems to come almost dayly.
90 vids - a little less photosets
Most softcore - some hc
Good preview
Easy navigation - layout a bit simple.
Exclusive material |
| Cons: |
Softcore videos/photosets has the upper hand
HC secondary - HC mainly in videos
Hardcore sets (video) are a bit strange - (great quality), but a little weird editing - like old softcore fucking-films. BUT some of the videos with everything, bj, threesome, fucking, closeups and so on.
BUT nok like any other average easteuropean site - this one has it's own style.
Download is mostly a bit slow: My average has been 350 Mb/sec. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was taken in by the preview - thanks!
This site (even if it's US-based) has some of the most fine looking easteuro-teens. Some of them has only been seen at FM Teens - and they are just great!
A small, naughty blond: Viktoriya is a soft-star at FM Teens. But here she's doing hc b/g in 2 videos (I'm still thrilled here) and a great vaginal-balls video (6 videos of this doll)
What's great too is, that you do not get disapointed about number of videos compared to photosets - it ads up.
There is now about 90 vids, most softcore, but all in great quality - man, even if the average size is about 200 Mb.
NB: My foremost liking for this site is that these teens are not pseudo-look-a-like with mosyly pigtail and small cotton-socks.
These girl are in high heels and /or nylons - sexy, if you ask me!
This is a new site and the amount is still just average for what we PU's are used to at more qualified sites at around $30.
But it looks like they do a good job in updates - by all means not every day - but ALMOST! And the updates is always with videos - and sometimes with photosets from the same video.
I've "cooled off" here after a week of membership, but I can recommend this site for lovers of euro-teens in sexy outfits in fine quality videos
And the photosets are really fine too (Drooler: you may disagree).
Bottom line: Great site - a bit like FM Teens but without all the pseudo lez-thing. And those solo-videos are among the best in this field of east euro-teens. |
|
05-28-08 12:10pm
Replies (12)
|
Review
57
|
24 Main Street
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive photosets and videos
Some fine looking girls/women - mostly US-asians
Cheap full trial
Ok quality for newer photos (1024x685) - but just ok! |
| Cons: |
No zip for photos
Small sized videos (2-5 minuttes)
Weird navigation
A little older videos poor quality
Lousy updates
Number of videos: approx: 100 - but some only 5-6 Mb. - and most NOT good quality |
| Bottom Line: |
I went for this site because it seemed to have some girls/women in the category of Playboy-style.
And some stuff with Divini Ray.
And the full trial at only $3.95.
Well for that small price you get full access, allright.
But the content is pretty slim and in general the quality is less than average:
Even if some of the videos are at 640x480 there's absolutely nothing crisp here - AND way too many videos are old at 320x240 in blurred standard - all wmv and only wmv.
TBP states 95 videos - could not count that many and a lot 3-6 Mb - short and bad quality.
Been here before one and a half year ago or more - and man, do they NOT deal in regular updates..
Most stuff seems to be from 2005 and 2006.
This is primarily a photosite - becuase the video section is simply too bad to make it a serious porn-site.
The navigation is strange, to say the least: Mainly you can search for photosets and videos (that's what most of us are into) - but you have to use some time to get around. Like searching for videos, you have to check out: A place called Drive In - I do not see much drive-in movie here - and for photosets: Curves... but ok, that's their kind of fun.
The worst part is lack of zip for the photos: I hate to download 50-80 photos in a set - manual.
Ok, this review is on a basis of only 3 days membership - but I won't stay...
And bottom line: I do not think this 24 Main Street live up to standards of good sites today - and certainly not sites that gets a score of about 80 at TBP |
|
05-21-08 02:05pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
58
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a PASS with up to 10 different sites
Vast amount of videos/photosets.
Unique content - some exclusive, some on license basis.(a few you can see at Teendreams, but just a few)
Easteuropean/russian/ukranian - and more alike girls.
Great , just great looking teens in the selection.
Very fine quality in videos at 4 of the 10 sites
Photos also ok
1280x720 in hd/great wmv quality
Very rare girls here - some exclusive.
A lot of hc, a lot of fine solo russian girls - and some lez.
Zip for photos on some sites - some NOT!
Do NOT go for photos entirely!
Quite regular updates (just found an entirely new video with Helen/Natasya (see her own site) wow!
Good download speed: I got up to 700 kb/sec. with IDM. |
| Cons: |
Confusing navigation
Too many "check-points" with username/password to every site - even if this is a "pass".
4-5 of the sites are only photos - still some good content - but at some sites no zip for photos.
Confusing set-up where navigation between sites are shitty. Some of the sites are NOT in the same league as others.
Not sure about updates - BUT they seems to be just ok! (They just got an entirely new Helen-video). |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my second try of a completly unknown area of russian/ukrainian content of girls.
But this I can tell:
A lot better sites/pass here than my18teens - see former review.
First there are 3 dammed good sites at this pass:
My Lovely Girls
HDTeensVideo
ExclusiveTeenPorn
The rest is mostly old stuff (no full scenes video) and poor photo sets.
But those 3 sites are worth the 29.95.
The videos are just plain great - some entirely exclusive and some on licensed basis - but all in fine quality.
1280x720 - only in wmv
some older in 720x576
all in full scene downloads AT the primary sites!!
Man, there are some great solo scenes here, that just rocked my world - and that I did not expect.
Yuliya or an unknown Candy - wow!
The best allround site is HD teens video - just fucking amazing!!!
Crisp videos - something like 50 of the best darned easteuropean teen-videos I've seen, yet.
Finaly:
Exclusive Teen Porn: Great all round teen porn with some 50 high-quality videos of both solo and hc. |
|
05-01-08 08:05am
Replies (6)
|
Review
59
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Rare stuff with easteuropean/russian teens
Most seems exclusive to this PU - only most
Again - most - in good video-quality (720x576)- all full scene download
3 different qualities - all wmv
Variety of hc, solo and a few girl/girl
Descent Live Cam (only works with Explorer)
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Strange navigation - best way to navigation is via models name/thumb
Medium size content in both pix and video.
Price too high.
No info about updates
Large "tags" on most photos
A lot difference in quality for both videos and photos |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has SOME potential if you're into russian teens - I could also says eateuropeans - but they all seems russian or from some states around.
There's a selection of teens not seen many other places - and some I haven't seen anywhere else before.
Look at preview: Ariel for one, Albina too - or Tina.
There's 73 videos - all in full scene download and most in really fine quality - size between 200Mb-800Mb in "high Quality" - crisp!
Download speed ok - got my 650-700 kb/sec.
A mix of mostly hc, some solo and a few socalled lez.
Maybe 7-10 videos (older) in poor quality.
Photos is not worth to join for (Sorry, Drooler) - the sessions are ok, but quality varries too much.
Some: 1200x900
a few: 3453x2304
Approx: 110 photosets
And most with big "name-tags" i the lower corner..
Was taken in by the preview - but when it comes down to it - I guess only 5-8 of the videos are really great - with some good looking teens - the rest is average or plain worthless - but it's also a matter of taste in girls.
I've seen better russian-teen sites and a lot worse - the site is not a scam - in PU-definition, but it's not great either.
And with a price of $29.95 the bottom line is: Only Average
And just if you really fall for one or two of the teens not seen anywhere else, then...
But do use the preview a lot... |
|
04-30-08 02:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
60
|
Adult Movie Max
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vast amount of older video-clips - vintage, almost.
I could say the price - but even that is too high - undless you're into browsing for a lot of old non-exclusive clips. |
| Cons: |
Lousy video-quality - I only found 320x240 wmv's - blurred and misrable.
No full video download - all is split up - some in files as many as 12.
Nothing exclusive here - you've seen it all before
Photos - forget it - only a few and in a quality worse you made with you first Kodak Instamatic as a kid.
Navigating for special categories is a mess - choose solo - and you also get tons of blowjobs and straight sex |
| Bottom Line: |
I cannot believe, that I haven't learned it yet. Falling for a stunt like this.
In very plain words: this site is bad, all bad. Even for the "special offer" at TBP for $19.95 it's a waste of money.
I joined because it looked somewhat different, ok the thumbs for video-clips in preveiw are blurred like hell, but no PUs have made a preview, so why not be the first at this one.
And TBP has an average of 82,6 - so it can't be that bad.
Friends at TBP: That rating for Adult Movie Max really deserves another look.
It's a very long time ago I've seen such miserable video-clips - I've tried to find just one or two that could make for this site, but no way.
Even if you do not watch the clips whole-screen, it's useless.
And get this for quality:
The site states 1010 videos and 311 hours.
The total size is 88,7 Gb - doesn't that say something.
This site is worth no more words other than:
Not recommended!! |
|
04-08-08 07:03am
Replies (2)
|
Review
61
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Janet is a rare type. Swell build - a fantiastic/fine body for a milf, I think you call it in the US. A mature woman with a rare sexual charisma.
Both videos and photo-sets.
Straight sex, a lot of interracial, fetish and some solo.
Ok amount for a solo-site. |
| Cons: |
Older stuff (videos) in BAD quality. Alas some of the best scenes are older and therefore the quality in videos are NOT good.
No zip for photos.
Troublesome navigation.
No overview for scenes or photos.
Plain layout - this site could really do with some work. |
| Bottom Line: |
I normally don't go for these kind of solo-sites with "older" or rather mature women. But I've been here before and this girl/woman Janet is extremely sexy, I think!
She's cute, with a lot of smiling and a very fine and FREE attitude towards sex. And man, she's got a GREAT body for her age (I guess she about 45 at this state)
Her first interest is interracial - she's into young black studs and brag about it. Some of her fuck-scenes are of it's own kind.
She has a lot of interaction - which means videos and photosets with members of her site - who she gives a blowjob or fucks.
The newer video files is in both mov. and WMV (640x480) - and they are ok in quality.
Some older ones are just in mov. and here the quality waries too much.
Most/ almost all video-files are split up - not only in parts - but also in dates, so you have to wait for the final ones - not good.
The navigation is a mess and the overview of content is worse.
But I forgive Janet - or rather her webmaster (or whoever) because this lady is one of a kind.
Well, for other PU who might be tempted take a look at her free photos - if you like what you see, go for it.
BTW: The price at TBP of $17.95 is NOT the right price. It's $ 24.95 - but this user still have no regrets of spending that amount - but only becuase Janet herself is worth it - the site itself lacks a lot.
So this is some kind of a recomendation, but also a warning, if you can't have a sloppy made site.
But I'll repeat this US-girl is something else. |
|
03-30-08 09:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some swell looking girls you (probably) will not see anywhere else.
Ok amount of sets and videos.
Videos are the top here and good quality- generally.
Mostly canadian girls and most very sexy
If you like softcore solo-girls, you'll find something here that no other site have (it seems)
Easy navigating. |
| Cons: |
No zip for photos (Man, it's 2008 - get your act together)
Some models are very "shy" or whatever. But some models do not even show their tits.
This could be considered as an american/canadian version of Only Tease - but it's even more soft.
Could not get the "Live" part to work, maybe it's my own fault?
Expensive! |
| Bottom Line: |
Browsed this site several times - then forgot all about it, until I saw silvers review.
When browsing the site again some real fine looking teens/girls came up.
The preview is ok, but get you to a point where you think the content is better than it really is.
I first went for the videos - as usual.
The best resolution is 720x480 - not top. But most videos are ok in quality - and then again the earlier videos still seem a bit blurred - even for 720x480.
They should do better in video resolution to make some kind of hit in the softcore-area.
Too bad some of the better looking models are doing videos extremely soft. No nipples, some keep their bra on and MOST do not remove their panties.
But - as mentioned - this is somewhat an answer to the british Only Tease - and if that's ok with you, this site is a fine alternative.
Still, you have to be a sucker for soft, because it's still $ 29.95 - and that's way too expensive for what you get, if you're looking for porn - even softcore.
And this is foremost for video-freaks. The photo-sets are fewer and there's no zip!
The navigation is allright with a lot of choices in browsing.
Do not know about the interaction, did not try, did not care.
Still - the live thing they promised did'nt wotk at all for this user.
Some good soft videos - but will NOT be back. |
|
03-18-08 10:10am
Replies (1)
|
Review
63
|
Babes.tv
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Generally GREAT videos
Large amount of those videos
Pleasently good (not too large) size of video-files (average 150 Mb, some more some less)
Fine - almost crisp - quality - most around 640x480 - but still ok for full screen.
A lot of exclusive content.
Lately more frequent update - daily - some videos and some photosets - but generally good amount of video-updates. |
| Cons: |
Not crazy about the lay-out or navigation.
Lay-out is somewhat ordinary (dull) and navigation can be confusing.
These guys seems to go after some kind of navigation from 1ByDay - and then again NOT.
The photo-navigation seems worse - but I'm not hunting for photos, so....
Old videos mostly in poor/average quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's a bit strange, that Babes.tv is a part of the company behind Babelicious.
And than again it seems like that Co. is trying to create something a bit different from Babelicious.
They succeed in lots of ways.
I've found some great videos here - files I have not seen before of especially hot euro-models - video-files that are not a part of the Babelicious site.
But above all - Babes.tv has grown a lot since I was last there in late 2006 - or maybe early 2007.
First the content has grown, the content of fine videos of mostly solo girls in a blend of US and euro-girls. Here is some good hc-videos too - also with the amount increasing.
I was somewhat surprised to find exclusive videos of Vendula/aka Vanessa Cooper, Katerina and Veronika - at least I've never seen them before - and I thought I knew them all. First time BTW that Katerina has hair without curls. And most of these are sexy.
I have not counted the videos - but well over 600 I guess - and whats great is, that quite a few of the girls has 3-4-5 or even 6 movie-files.
There are large-thumbnails of every video for preview - great.
But I'm not a friend of their navigation. And lately they have had too many videos of photoshoots - and even if their way of doing these photoshoot-videos are quite a bit better thanm most other sites - it's still not my cup of tea.
But if you are a fan of well performed/well edited and quite sexy solo videos this site is to recommend. |
|
02-16-08 11:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
64
|
British Hot Girls
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Ok amount of videos for a special site
Good amount of photos in ok quality
zip for photos
Price is just reasonable - not more than that |
| Cons: |
Video-quality is average/below average in spite of dimensions - way too blurred in fullscreen.
Older RM-video files are a disaster - and they are about 1/3 of all sets
Slow updates - very slow video-updates
Most girls are ordinary and most - again - not very sexy.
Not crazy about the navigation - see below. |
| Bottom Line: |
In my search for sexy british girls - especially on video - this came up.
But in general the site is not good - almost at the end of one month membership I found 4-5 videos to download for keeps - and I'll probably only keep one with the model Lucy Zara - she's hot and has 5 good photosets.
The navigation is quite ordinary, but not very logical - for one you have to go through numbers instead of alfabetic-order looking for certain names - or have to know correct spelling of a models name - most not well known.
The layout is not exiting.
Even if most videos comes in 640x480 or the latest in 720x576 the quality is below todays standard - and the video-shooting seems stereotype - the style is too much alike - the sound - even with some sexy talk are terrible and noisy.
Video-file size between 80 and 150 Mb (approx) - thats ok.
Photo-size 1680x1120 and the quality is allright - better than the videos at least.
It's hard to recommend this site - it need LOTS of work - wonder if they'll get that work done.
At least they should invest in better video-equipment. |
|
02-12-08 01:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
65
|
AV9898
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vast amount of videos
SOME great looking asian/japan-girls/teens filmed in Japan
Video-quality is ok/average: 800x450 in WMV only |
| Cons: |
Very bad navigation
No full video-files
Video quality differs
Lame acting concerning the girls male partners - strange - but maybe only for us int he west.
Most non exclusive - but you can never tell with these huge quantities of jap-videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site you might turn to in search for sexy asian girls with non-US relations - since it's still one of the tops at TBP corcerning asians.
This is jap-teens/girls who mostly do a great performance - but foremost if your're into some sort of fetish. Like girls "crying" for more or for mercy in a strange way.
And japaneese men with half lame dicks getting off like wham-bam-thank-you-mam. Weird!
But ok, you can find some rarely seen and great looking teens doing a good job in pleasing the viewer.
Once in a while it's fine to watch non-US asians, but I'd prefer thais anytime.
The navigation is lousy - it takes a long time to get used to the logic here - or rather the non existing logic.
The video-files are all split up - you download via thumdnails (3-5 for one whole scene) - but the thumbnail are not always the right ones - a mess. You want to download one scene - and you get another.
The files are too big - one scene typical over 500 Mb (self-joined files). But the quality is not ALWAYS what you'd expect from a file-size this big.
Bottom line these Japan-based sites with Japan-girls are in a very special catagory - porn that may please for a short while - but in the long term it gets boring.
I downloaded 4-5 good movies out of almost 600 - no big deal
Won't be back.
BTW: The time-difference between Euro and US-members at PU is somewhat special. I made this review late afternoon in Scandinavia and it's early morning in the US (eastcoast, I guess)
Goooooooood morning. |
|
02-04-08 08:06am
Replies (4)
|
Review
66
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very Good - as the rating goes (82)
25 fine videos of a doll in this field.
And Anette Dawn certainly is a doll.
40 sets of photos.
Zip for photos
OK quality videos
OK quality photos - but just ok |
| Cons: |
Updates are way too slow.
This is only a softcore/mastubation-site with a single model - nothing else. No lez (if thats what you want) and no hc (b/g). |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, friends. You can see this review as some sort of an update of the fine review from exotics4me (no comparison intended).
But it's almost 4 month ago since that review - and what's happened?
Not much!!!
There are 7 more videos updated in those four month. That's NOT good enough for a site that charge 25 bucks.
A little more photo-sets has occured, but no big deal. At this time there are 40 sets of photos - something like 13 more in the same period - alas - nothing to speak of.
Some of the photo-sets are among the best in the softcore glamour-field. But also here there's a bit of stereotype - most look alike.
The resolution are just average: 1280x854.
The same goes for zipped sets.
Here in mid-january 2008 there are 25 videos - not much for a site this price.
And the videos are all 720x404 in WMV. Or quicktime (but who goes for that?)
The quality is alright/good, but not more.
Still it's great to watch AD on her videos - she's just a NATURAL: Sexy, sweet and erotic. Wish there were more models of her kind.
And these videos are exclusive - not even the company-site (Twistys) has those videos.
And that's whats great and that's also the reason that this special solo-model site deserves recommendation.
There's not much else here at anettedawn.com. There are something called "diary", "recommondation" and "wishlist" - but they are not in function.
But, ok - so what?
Foremost this site has one force:
Anette Dawn herself....on video!
She is just beautiful. |
|
01-20-08 08:59am
Replies (6)
|
Review
67
|
MetArt
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam |
| Cons: |
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.
As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.
The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!
I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.
It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny. |
|
01-10-08 06:17am
Replies (15)
|
Review
68
|
Brain Pass
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
SORRY, FOLKS!
A different review.
BUT, ok, first:
Hugh amount of content - videos foremost
(nothing else in the pro-section) |
| Cons: |
In spite of many good points elsewhere - TBP included - this site is simply boring - and what is worse:
This is 2008 and the quality of videos are between lousy and average. And most is OLD material.
The content of these socalled "different" sites in this socalled network are replica or maybe more like repetion - you,ll find the same videos in a lot of the sites here: What do you call that?
I call it bait for suckers like us! |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, sorry again - but I'm getting fed up and bored with sites/networks like this - it's the same old thing over and over again. And poor/average quality.
Brainpass has gathered some sites that was on the way to the graveyard - why not let them die in peace.
Next: Ok, it's NOT only that I'm bored with the same old stuff - or the same old wine in new bottles - it's also lack of technical and erotic quality of videos here - which is mostly so blurred and only "wham-bam-thank-you-mam" that it's a travesty of fine erotica and fine porn.
The photos are not worth to mention.
I still give it 65 for some rarely found videos (Bruno), but, man, thay are few.
And 65 for SOME fun browsing, though it was still getting more and more depressing along the line - in search for just the small amout of goodies.
So HELP!
Maybe I'm getting tired of porn - and then again not. I think, I'm just getting tired of all the porn that keeps repeating itself. The porn - like on these site - that do not have a single ambition of offering something new.
Jeeeez, I miss the "old" times when it was possible to find NEW stuff, new stuff with real erotica - hard or soft.
I may also repeat myself when quoting Paul Le Mat in the great movie "American Graffiti" in his search for girls on a cruising night:
"The pickings are sure getting slim".
Hope for a better 2008 in search for good porn. |
|
01-09-08 09:55am
Replies (5)
|
Review
69
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Like PU-ratings go for 80-89: VERY GOOD!
Recommended!
Well, Fellas, I really like this site:
Great content, fine quality videos of a great looking US-LADY - and she's a LADY.
Solo-site with this swell-bodied woman who TBP claims to be Brazilian - she sounds US to me.
Fine video-quality - and above all: A great Amateur site. |
| Cons: |
Too high a price for a solo-site.
Photos lacks a lot in quality - mostly a lot like screencaps. But again this is for us video-freaks.
Not sure about updates.
Repetion in SOME way about the large amout of videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Do not know if this fine looking woman is brazilian or not. But bottom line: it does not matter.
She is a sexy looking woman with sexy ways in her act.
There is a huge amount of fine videos - dating back to 2003. Ok, the earlier video are NOT that great - but what can you expect for video-quality from four years ago.
TBP states 284 videos - did not find that many, but close - and most are very good quality - the latest are the best.
Still the videos are 640x480 and most in good condition. And well, this hot woman (not girl) handles some different guys in a way most guys would like to be taken care of from a woman like this.
Even if some of the videos are a bit repetions, most of them are quite sexy in a cute, "homely" and very erotic way...
This woman does it all - a lot of BJ ( like most american like, I guess) some great HJ and the way she fuck some guys are just swell.
This is above all: Amateur site with a woman build like most men like - good hips, fine boobs and a sexy way of talk and treating her partners.
I have only found a few of this quality around - when talking about amateurs and solo-sites.
And this is one of the better ones - See preview. |
|
12-22-07 09:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
70
|
Only Tease
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Soft, soft and all soft - and still very soft
Great amount of photosets of mostly nice/great looking british girls.
Photos in 3 different qualities for download in zip
Fine resolutions.
Newer videos in ok quality (only ok) 640x480
Ok price |
| Cons: |
Too few videos - earlier videos lousy quality
TBP claims 863 videos - could not find that many (see below)
Some may find this too soft - most girls keep the panties on |
| Bottom Line: |
This is quite a nice site if you like the very soft stuff for a change.
Most of the quality is good/great with very fine photo-sets, especially the newer sets has high-resolution with zip.
And if you're into typical british girls.
Been here at the site 3 or 4 times before - and still some the photos and a few videos turn me on.
In the videos some of the girls try to talk a little dirty and some with succes - but you got to be content with a little strip and some boobs - and that's it. But some of it is still rather erotic.
You won't find many sites like this.
They used to have more videos, but a lot seems to be gone - but that's not a big deal, 'cause some of the old ones was in pretty bad quality.
Still they try to renew themselves - with a new design and better navigation. And they have new stuff with some of the sexiest models like Lucy Zara (she's a doll - have her own site, but that site is NOT worth the money.
Still, I was more exited the first times around - and the updates of videos are a bit slow.
But ok, for a niche-site with this kind of softcore Only Tease is worth a visit.
But I still hate generated login/passwords |
|
12-18-07 04:40pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
71
|
Digital Desire
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of videos and photosets for the price.
Some HD-videos in very fine quality.
Zip for photos
Ok price |
| Cons: |
Not much new - even some of the updates seems old.
Not all exclusive - quite a few video-sets/photo sets seen elsewhere
Confusing navigation - hard looking for the real updates.
To much content with video-interviews |
| Bottom Line: |
Had a comment resently where I spoke against the quality and non-exclusive updates.
In the "Current Member" and how long - I've cheated. I have not been a steady member for 12 month, but be a member on and off for 12 months and quite a bit more.
Still I get the feeling, that this site has quite a low standard all in all.
The updates and content in general are NOT up-to-date in what you should expect from a site like this - They still live on retro.
The small video-files are sometimes quite sexy, but mostly boring. Nothing new here concerning better filming, better and more sexy scenes and above all: Find some entirely new models - like a lot of the better sites are able to.
Maybe this site was somewhat of a pioneer at one time, but, man - that was a long time ago.
Too bad, 'cause some of the videos are still great - there is just too far between them.
Good that DD has quit DRM, but that's not enough to return a 6th, 7th or 8th time to this site.
And DD, your socalled HD (hardcore extreme) are a laugh - old, non-exclusive and worse - and you can call it "extreme" from here to Kingdom Come - it's still boring and older stuff. |
|
12-09-07 09:07am
Replies (3)
|
Review
72
|
Pacino's Adventures
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great - and I repeat GREAT looking real south american teens - again I repeat: TEENS.
Exclusive models in exclusive videos.
Three download-sizes of videos.
Zip for photos
Fair/good preview |
| Cons: |
Even the socalled "Super HQ" videos are mostly in NOT high quality.
The quality is generally too over-exposed - which means too bright videos.
Some photo-sets are the same with hillarious quality, strange!
Low amount of content - but ok, quite new site (set the price after that, folks!) |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, this is a rather new site from Pacino - to some well known - who has had some very soft latin sites for a while.
But Pacinos flair for great looking real latin teens is almost legendary. Except from one serious lack: The low quality of videos at his sites - is just as legendary.
So here come a completly new HARDCORE site "Pacino's Adventures".
The preview caught me on the spot. Very sexy and cute young latinas - the kind you do not see on US-based latina-sites - end not even at the new Argentina-site.
You can download quite a few preview-videos - and the style and the girls turned me on - of course while I expected greater quality as promised in the preview. Even the Rabbit states "good quality" in HQ videos.
But they are NOT high quality!
Ok, no blurred things and quite "sharp". But the colours are weird. It's too much "milky white" - see for yourselves in the previews. It's almost the same in the HQ inside.
Too bad, 'cause the content is great and exclusive, the same goes for the girls. Actually I redirected my player to show them in black and white - pretty "old time sexy".
PS: They have an offer here where you can join Pacinos "Latin Teen Pass" for only $10 more for 7 days. Unless you like the very soft - most no nude - stuff forget it. And the normal price here is $45 - outrageous for some low quality mega-soft videos and lame photosets.
Still the Adventure-site is quite sexy - apart from the peculiar video-solution.
TO Pacino: Get some new cameras. |
|
12-08-07 07:01am
Replies (3)
|
Review
73
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some very fine looking girls/women - all of US origin. (of course)
Good/average quality of videos. Older ones NOT.
Five different sites in the package.
Both teens (almost) and mature girls/women.
Soft-soft-soft ...all soft.
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Not a large amount of content.
Confusing statements of what different sites you get with the package.
Earlier videos NOT good quality.
No info about updates
Few photos in every set
Price-confusion |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site or sites to get some authentic Playboy-stuff.
Ok, some of the content is really like the true Playboy, but the really true Playboy-stuff, like Playboy Plus prommised here, you do not get.
Instead you get 5 small sites in all like Fresh Faces, Try out, Sexy Wives, Busty Babes, College Girls and All Natural.
Sounds like much, but it isn't. It takes you a couple of hours or less to browse through it all.
The videos are mostly very short - 3-4 minuttes and like I hate videos of photoshoots, I also hate all these interviews where girls tell you a lot of (stupid) thing about what they like and do not like - what do I care. I want to watch some sexy videos.
Well, ok. There are SOME really sexy videos here - but it's too few. And the olders ones have some of the best content, but worst quality.
I can only give a low recommendation here - if you like sexy, soft US-girls there's a lot of other sites that gives you better value.
If your into it for the photos, forget it. Small sets and not great quality.
Price: They state $19.87 - when I joined, I was charged 21,46 Euro - that's almost $30. I may complain later....but I'm getting fed up with this kind of problems...
Bottom line: A few - way too few sexy solo-videos - and they are too short.
Has the old Heff outlived himself? - well, according to this/these sites his company has not been able to keep up! |
|
12-06-07 11:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
74
|
Third Movies
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
High quality videos - most in different wmv-sizes and some also in avi
Lots of sexy easteuropean models
Bonus-site (ZTOD) in same quality and almost same amount.
A video site with photos as secondary |
| Cons: |
Too much repeating log-in during browsing and download - username/password generated.
Some - or rather too many of the films (with 4-6 sets) have NO download, just stream.
Still some DRM
Not that much content
Expensive. |
| Bottom Line: |
Even if the DRM are ALMOST gone this site or these two sites still have problems.
The worst is, that some of the better videos have no download attached even if they state, that this and this video has been downloaded a certain number of times.
Most or the content is rather great with fine quality videos. But some of it is too disorganized with wrong video downloads attached to the vid-thumbnails.
And some of the older videos still have DRM.
And quite a few of the best videos - among them a couple new ones with Sharka Blue you cannot download- and if you use Netscape to stream instead, you're fucked - it breakes down.
When I tried too use Explorer, I could not log in.
Search-machine inside is a mess: If you search for Latin, for exampel - you get some latin, some euroteens and lots of other stuff with absolutely no latins. Or if you search their genre: One-on-One, you get a whole lot of gangbang.
Bottom Line: Too much annoying trouble with this site - both of them. It's a shame cause some of the content is just great.
Try to fix it, guys.... |
|
12-04-07 11:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
75
|
Amour Angels
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Photo-section is the best for this site
A lot of exclusive easteuropean teens and a lot known easteuropean teen in exclusive photo-sets.
Some fine videos in fine quality, some in average/poor qiality
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Way too few videos.
The site has promissed more videos and updates for archives videos, but that has not been fullfilled in my period of membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was one I had some expectations for. Since the webmaster stated to both jd1961 and myself in a mail, that the amount of videos would increase.
But that has not happened.
In almost a month three, maybe four new videos has appeared - that's a laugh.
Look at the price - almost the same as 1ByDay - which has 2 dayly videos in very high quality.
But ok, for old timers like me on the porn-hunt 1ByDay and alike might get a little boring in the long run. So the alternative COULD be a site like Amour Angels.
But, folks at PU - AA is not an alternative. The pickinŽis much too slim. For a video-freak you do not want to restrict yourself with three or maybe four new videos in a month for $29.95.
The best thing about this site is the amount of exclusive photos - and thats what earns the score. But I no longer care much about photo-sets, so for other video-entusiast at PU: I cannot recommend this site. |
|
11-26-07 07:32am
Replies (1)
|
|
