Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Hegre Art
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly great looking young girls. Good design. Easy browsing. Good quality photos and videos (but short videos) |
| Cons: |
Very overrated site. The videos are average 50mb and lasts 4-5 minuttes. Video are way too few - when you - like I - go for the solo videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Yeah, bottom line:
This site is not that good - and not worth a 90 or more.
Some - 200 - dull edited videos that is supposed to look like art, but are absolutly boring and without appeal.
You can find most of these girls in lot better sites with more sexy videos.
Even with the $19.95, I fell like wasting my money. |
|
03-18-07 10:23am
Replies (4)
|
Review
52
|
Honey Chest
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Large amount of videos - photos less
Bonus sites where some of them have quite a good amount of content
Primarely videos for all sites
Full trial access for a low price |
| Cons: |
Most of the content for all sites are non-exclusive.
Some of the sites in this pack can even "boast" of not having any exclusive at all - just look at "Solo Stunners".
Although the price is fair (trial) you can find the content a lot of other places
Updates? No idea - but not regularly for sure. |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, this is a site - with it's bonus sites that belongs to the company New Sensations.
Ok, they have Reel Pass and NS All Access which both are better. But generally NS has a problem with videos that are just average in quality.
Here they give you a choice of what I counted was 10-11 different sites which all are in this pack.
Most sites don't even offer you some previews of videos - no wonder. Because they are not worth going for. Average quality is the best way I can put it - at a bad day I'll say "poor quality".
Some of the bonus-sites are a joke - Bikini Dream for one. Some low-pix photos and really bad videos. The site "Solo Stunners" only contains videos we have seen a million times elsewhere
This time I really disagree with our friends at TBP concerning points.
But ok, as Spencer also puts it: Not sure about the exclusive - he's sure right having a doubt there..
Don't waste your money.
Well, 9.95 gives you the right to the lot - it's not much, but even that amount is wasted. |
|
08-19-07 07:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Like PU-ratings go for 80-89: VERY GOOD!
Recommended!
Well, Fellas, I really like this site:
Great content, fine quality videos of a great looking US-LADY - and she's a LADY.
Solo-site with this swell-bodied woman who TBP claims to be Brazilian - she sounds US to me.
Fine video-quality - and above all: A great Amateur site. |
| Cons: |
Too high a price for a solo-site.
Photos lacks a lot in quality - mostly a lot like screencaps. But again this is for us video-freaks.
Not sure about updates.
Repetion in SOME way about the large amout of videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Do not know if this fine looking woman is brazilian or not. But bottom line: it does not matter.
She is a sexy looking woman with sexy ways in her act.
There is a huge amount of fine videos - dating back to 2003. Ok, the earlier video are NOT that great - but what can you expect for video-quality from four years ago.
TBP states 284 videos - did not find that many, but close - and most are very good quality - the latest are the best.
Still the videos are 640x480 and most in good condition. And well, this hot woman (not girl) handles some different guys in a way most guys would like to be taken care of from a woman like this.
Even if some of the videos are a bit repetions, most of them are quite sexy in a cute, "homely" and very erotic way...
This woman does it all - a lot of BJ ( like most american like, I guess) some great HJ and the way she fuck some guys are just swell.
This is above all: Amateur site with a woman build like most men like - good hips, fine boobs and a sexy way of talk and treating her partners.
I have only found a few of this quality around - when talking about amateurs and solo-sites.
And this is one of the better ones - See preview. |
|
12-22-07 09:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
They got lots of photos - both europeans and US-models.
A large amount of videos , but well known from a LOT of other sites.
Pretty good zip-system for photos.
A full access trial for $9.95 |
| Cons: |
Nothing exclusive
Far too average quality of both videos and photos.
A lot of really old material.
Lousy navigation |
| Bottom Line: |
I only took the $ 9.95 five days full access trial - thank you!
Even that money was wasted as a whole. I downloaded some/a few photo-zips of which most was a rather nice reprise from earlier years - photos I've have cleaned from my pc years ago - but nice to see again, though.
I also downloaded a few videos, but, man.... again videos you've seen before included all the famous/infamous once on the yellow/orange couch. I erased them again.
Admid, I'm getting fed up with all those sites that are just replicates when you get down to it.
Still looking for something new in the style of good european/US-models solo and hc - things of quality that you have not run into a million times before.
You won't get that here.
But my 67 goes for average quality and good quantity of porn for people/fellow new users that's not been searching as long as some of us "old timers"....
Should this review only be for the "old timers" or connaisseurs it'd be around 50 or less..... |
|
09-08-07 08:42am
Replies (5)
|
Review
55
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large amount of centent
Nice/swell US and european models
Good 3-days trial price |
| Cons: |
Average/poor quality for videos
DRM for the best quality videos
Strange navigation
Hopeless way of watching and downloading videos.
Photos in average/low solution
No zip (could not find it, anyway) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a strange site.
Hustler is a wellknown name even for us europeans and Larry Flint too.
Still I do not understand why a coorporation this size make such a poor web-site - compared to content amount and other qualities. (well, and again I do - like Playboy and Penthouse sites that never seems to be able to hit the top, it's still strange).
I go for videos - and it takes almost a day or two to get to know the strange way of viewing and especially downloading videos - and there's no preview, apart from a small thumbnail of the front-cover. You have to "preview-stream" first to find the scenes you MAY like.
I found a way to download some videos in "the best quality". But when I opened the videos, the quality were miles away from what is just average for newer clips.
The streams are certainly not better.
The content - models, sex-scenes and what not -is generally not better than the average videos at VideoBox - just worse in quality.
I gave up trying to download photos...
Well, there might be a lot of extras here like Hustler Humor, Hustler Mobile, Live chat and so on, but that's not my kind of game (site) |
|
10-09-07 01:39pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
56
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material – vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality – among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates – one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download – except update browsing
+ Nice price – except: see below |
| Cons: |
- Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below) |
| Bottom Line: |
In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.
This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls – the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes – some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere – but to my knowledge from this site.
And the best deal is, that most – far most – of the girls/models – have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model – that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.
The navigation is mostly very easy – especially when browsing models – the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems – still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......
The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts
And – you get 4 streaming options, too.
At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here – a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here – 1700-2000 Kb/sec – sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.
It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 – you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.
Preview: It's miserable and not informative – Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you
Not much into pics – but you get three seizes – and of course zip – best is:
2000x1333.
I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here – and joined – and happy, I did.
This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended. |
|
08-19-12 11:35am
Replies (13)
|
Review
57
|
In The Crack
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly top-quality videos and stills (primarily from 2007 and forward)
Top models - euro and US and a little from elsewhere
Maybe some of the best full body (teasing) scenes - and of course a LOT - too many - close ups.
Here you get a lot of kinds of strip tease, posing ect. - and done in professional, erotic and sexy ways.
Variation of models
Download manager allowed - thank you (LARGE files)
Good preview - apart from the fact that you do NOT get much videos as preview.
The way the models act, are done with make-up and the final quality - nobody else have this kind of quality!!!!
Zip for PHOTOSETS |
| Cons: |
High price!!! ($ 34.95)
Still got that DAMN regional pricing - could not get it other ways, so it was - EURO 34.95 - over $ 40.
No full scene downloads - BUT: ok, the files are so large that a full scene - joined - is mostly over 2,5-3 GBs.
Older from 2007/2006 and back are NOT great quality
TOO much close ups - BUT that the name in the game: "In The Crack" - so be prepared to a LOT of pussy/anal close ups.
Updates are not in the top league - 10-12 a month - both videos and stills.
Top quality video files ( all WMV) are simply TOO large - this quality can work in less seize...
Only solo - and some lez. |
| Bottom Line: |
First of all:
THANKS TO DROOLER for bringing this site to my attention - even if it's some time ago.
So I've been looking/hunting/browsing this site for some time before I got to this - hesitated because I really dislike that regional pricing shit, but ok:
Can't resist anymore!
Why?
Because the deal here is very simple to the solo-girl lover: You'll get some magnificent performance from some of the best looking teens/girls/models around - Euro, Easteuro, Latin and US-models.
Done in maybe the best way to day for solo-videos at all.
I've seen them all elsewhere - so it's not new models - but In The Crack has something else: it's the way the scenes are done, the quality (from around 2008 and up till now) that are so special.
They have several scenes with Lexa:
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/melisa.html
Great looking girl - but at In The Crack - her videos are close to heaven...
Well, check out the preview.
Even good old Shawna Lenee has the best solo videos, I've seen
All video-files are split - and all in WMV - but since the (each) files are so large - it's not a problem - and you join them if you want.
You get more than 400 videos here - ok, split up (in LARGE clips) and alomst 100 great models - the price is high - and apart from the regional shit - I still think it's worth it - have not regretted my join....
Three sizes of videos (640x360 - 1280x720 - 1920x1080)
Those large video files are sometimes over 1 GB - and if you download all - man, you're going to need pretty much space..
Stills - photosets are: 2400x1800 - for the later stills.
Bottom line - this In The Crack has so much potential and some very erotic/sexy solo material that I got to hand it a 95 for: Quality, sexy performance, models and the way the girls are handled in the videos... still a bit too expensive, regional pricing a big CONS - but a lot of fine material will fill your hard disk a little too fast - because the content is worth it.....
You got to check out this site, if you have not been here, yet... |
|
06-13-10 08:08am
Replies (4)
|
Review
58
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Janet is a rare type. Swell build - a fantiastic/fine body for a milf, I think you call it in the US. A mature woman with a rare sexual charisma.
Both videos and photo-sets.
Straight sex, a lot of interracial, fetish and some solo.
Ok amount for a solo-site. |
| Cons: |
Older stuff (videos) in BAD quality. Alas some of the best scenes are older and therefore the quality in videos are NOT good.
No zip for photos.
Troublesome navigation.
No overview for scenes or photos.
Plain layout - this site could really do with some work. |
| Bottom Line: |
I normally don't go for these kind of solo-sites with "older" or rather mature women. But I've been here before and this girl/woman Janet is extremely sexy, I think!
She's cute, with a lot of smiling and a very fine and FREE attitude towards sex. And man, she's got a GREAT body for her age (I guess she about 45 at this state)
Her first interest is interracial - she's into young black studs and brag about it. Some of her fuck-scenes are of it's own kind.
She has a lot of interaction - which means videos and photosets with members of her site - who she gives a blowjob or fucks.
The newer video files is in both mov. and WMV (640x480) - and they are ok in quality.
Some older ones are just in mov. and here the quality waries too much.
Most/ almost all video-files are split up - not only in parts - but also in dates, so you have to wait for the final ones - not good.
The navigation is a mess and the overview of content is worse.
But I forgive Janet - or rather her webmaster (or whoever) because this lady is one of a kind.
Well, for other PU who might be tempted take a look at her free photos - if you like what you see, go for it.
BTW: The price at TBP of $17.95 is NOT the right price. It's $ 24.95 - but this user still have no regrets of spending that amount - but only becuase Janet herself is worth it - the site itself lacks a lot.
So this is some kind of a recomendation, but also a warning, if you can't have a sloppy made site.
But I'll repeat this US-girl is something else. |
|
03-30-08 09:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
Joey's Babes
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good quality in videos
Ok/average in quantity |
| Cons: |
No, Maggie at TBP. The content is NOT exclusive. You can find these videos a lot of other places. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just a new site from some people who have found good/average videos elsewhere and put it on their site.
Not even the price is especially good. |
|
03-03-07 10:02am
Replies (1)
|
Review
60
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Crisp videos - if you want to call anything HD, this may be it.
VMW, DIVX, Ipod and Quicktime.
Some cute/sexy easteuro teens (SOME)
Access to both Just Teen Movie and Just Teen Site |
| Cons: |
Lousy navigation - no idea about updates, unless you've got a very good memory.
Most video-files are way too large (some over 700 MB for 15 minuttes).
Too few videos
High price - even with the co-access.
Lousy video-updates
Repeting log-in |
| Bottom Line: |
As Just Teen Site is among the best in its field when it comes to easteuro-teens (photo-sets and a few videos), why not go for the newer offer from this company:
Just Teen Movie has not had much time (since april 2008), so as you'd suspect a not so large amount of clips.
And you'd be quite right. In april TBP stated 32 (full)videos.
Here in middle august the amount is 42 - call that an honest way of doing updates? I do not think so.
I really liked the idea of Just Teen Site doing a special movie/video-site, but what a bummer.
Do not dream of a great variation of models -like Just Teen Site - it's simply a matter of to few models.
Instead some - not so exiting models (in my humble opinion) are doing three or more videos each - and that does not come to much out of 42.
The videos are crisp, for sure. But using up to more than 700 Mb on a 15-18 minuttes clip is not very professionel in todays standard.
OK: You get DIVX, VMW, iPOD and Quicktime and full scene downloads.Good stream-preview of every clip.
AND: The navigation is worthless - if there is any at all. You're not able to look for either updates, nor models - just go for "more videos" as you taggle along - and you end up comming back to a different start of content (out of line!).
Rediculous price of $34.95.
A comfort here is that you NOW get access to Just Teen Site as well - but where JTS was formerly also a good/medium good video-site - it lacks now. This is not a review of JTS, but I still notice, that this site has not had any video-update since july 16th.
But bottum line:
The score 68 is as mentioned at TBP/PU:
Does more things wrong than right - low recommondation. |
|
08-20-08 06:02am
Replies (12)
|
Review
61
|
Karup's PC
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ An exorbitant amount of material
+ You can go on for days/weeks/months in your search
+ You'll find a lot of exclusive/licensed material here, that's hard to find anywhere else.
+ Even with the use of licensed material (too!), you'll find stuff here that might take you a lot of time to locate anywhere else (and save you some money)
+ Easy navigation - it's generally fun to browse all this content.
+ A lot of exclusive vids and photosets - even if they generally got external providers.
+ Fine updates - every day. (Except weekends)
+ Much better vid-quality - lately.
+ DM allowed and zip for pix
+ Almost ALL vids in WMV |
| Cons: |
Not so damn much in the cons. - but:
- The new/newer vids quality could still be a bit better!!
- In spite of the enormous amount of material, quite a lot - or at least some of the models are VERY average.
- I like old stuff, by all means - but too much of this are in low quality.
- Most of the vids here are in average quality - only the very new are in HD - wish they would update some of the old vids.
- The navigation is generally fine - but the design is an 'old timer' - they need to renew that - with a touch, though.
- A lot of model-name confusion.
AND - Cons bottomline: Why not get together a Karups network, too! |
| Bottom Line: |
Karup's PC - man, I've been here a LOT of times over the years - it's porn - no: PORN - from when things where a little bit greener/younger.
This site - and the Karup's Hometown Amateurs - and the later Karup's Older Women kind of reminds me of the old days - not so much bullshit - just a lot of fine material in vids and pix-sets - and hours and hours of browsing - and enjoying.
Like the deal where you can find models with pix and vids from long time back:
MAN, dig this - I even found the greatest vids and sets of an hungarian model - Chanel - who's now a 'working girl' (escort-service) here in Denmark/Europe - always wanted to fuck her - and now she has very fine vids and sets here - funny!
You can go on at this Karup's PC - and locate girls/models that you have not seen in a long time - and wow, suddenly, you'll find material - sometimes a little older stuff than you'll find at 21. Sextury or DDF or elsewhere. BUT the same model.... I like that!
Generally the pix/photosets of just a little older material seems/are better than the older vids.
The quality of newer vids - from late 2009 and 2010 has increased a lot. Most now in HD - whatever that means - because even if they're ok in viewing quality - none of the vids - even the latest are in the same league as what you can watch from 21. Sextury/DDF/and alike - and very far from In The Crack - if Karup's PC would ever get there, I'd put another 5 on the score...
But bottomline Karup's PC is a very decent site with a hell of a lot of fine material for the serious pornbrowser - but bare in mind 2/3 of the vids/sets are softcore - only 1/3 hc (aproxx.) - the same goes for the pixsets.
(BTW: That my score is the same as the DUKE's (TBP), says more about the DUKE than this user, but we agree here... LOL) |
|
10-25-10 06:42am
Replies (5)
|
Review
62
|
Karup's PC
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I wonder why Karups PC is on an average scale with BP (82-85) - whereas PU is 90-95. Well, I'm not the one to guess.
Pros: This site has a magnificent amount of photos and videos - the later of both are high/average quality. Photos with zip, videos only in wmv.
Very good updates - both photos and video. A lot better than most sites. |
| Cons: |
The quality in general could be better for the videos - a least a little better - the latest are ok, but not top.
The navigation for photos are irritating to say the least. Every girl has sections of photos. But every section is divided into smaller parts of 8-10 pics. And you have to navigate through it all one-by-one - both for whole photos and for zips. |
| Bottom Line: |
During the last two, three or maby four years Karups PC has given me good and new stuff.
The navigation is very special, but for a video-fan it's not bad at all.
The last year or so Karups deliver 1-2 update series of videos a week. And it's updates that includes 5-6 video-series to download. Hardcore and solo and some lez. Solos are divided into two files, hardcore mostly into four parts. A little strange that a site this large do not go for whole downloads - but ok, a movie joiner is good here.
What pleases me the most is, that a lot of the solo girl and hardcore videos are exclusive - I've found a lot of new girls at this site - and the good and regular updates makes me come back to the site now and then.
There is a mix of US-girls and typical easteuropeans - alas the US-girl videos has embarrasing soundstuff where some yerk try to make a "sexy" conversation with the girl - well, we've seen that in too many US-sites.
But "bottom line" Karups PC has a lot of good videos which I'd hope will still get better in HD-quality.
For the photo section you will have a hard time finding a site with bigger content - so regardless of the stupid dividing of each girl-section, it's still a lot of fun navigating through the hugh amount of photos. |
|
07-29-07 09:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Killergram
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Quality of DVD's/video-downloads is top - and it is top!
Quantity is average, but who needs a lot of blurred videos on their harddisk.
(easy download (full scene) - and no limits or any other bullshit)
International models - a lot of new british models - some VERY sexy blonds.
Good editing with a bit more foreplay/strip than usual.
I have not seen any of the videos I've reached this far anywhere else...
Easy login - no generated passwords or other hassles. |
| Cons: |
Price is high: $39.95
A bit confusing navigating at first - but you get use to it fast.
No photos - but again: This is a video site.
Ok, I do not fancy tattooed girls - there is a little bit too many here - but I guess that's the new trend, alas! |
| Bottom Line: |
Yeah, bottom line:
This is new content campared to what I've seen anywhere else, and I feel like I've been around for quite some time.
Well, some have seen this faboulos model, Delta White in a single video at a site I don't remember the name of (supposed to be hot Indian model, and it's far east India). But here there is 9 outstanding videos of this smashy (but alas tattooed) looking blond. The same - number almost - goes for some of the other "stars". (Check out Antonia Deona, wauv). I wish I could share/send the video: Antonia - The pole Dancer with/to you all, but thats not possible, alas
And again, bottom line: I do not regret spending a little more (10 bucks)for this site compared to many others.
But tnanks to TBP - I don't think I would have found it unless TBP had put it on "The New Listing"
For once in a long time I'm surpriced by a completely new site - the quality has not been great lately - look at the average scores at TBP's newer listings.
But again - just do not take my word on this site - it's possible to navigate quite a lot before signing up, so you can get an idea of what you pay for.........I think maybe some of you guys will agree.
Sorry! I forgot to mention: All hardcore.
Follow-Up:
Well, another downgrade after re-visit.
Site seems to be at a standstill with the same themes - some new models, but not too many of them are really sexy. |
|
05-12-07 07:08am
Replies (1)
|
Review
64
|
Lap Dance Gone Bad
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
You get 4/5 sites with this one.
The best I can say about this Lap Dance Gone Bad is the different way of making the videos - only 8
Average wmv-quality
sexy performance
Good 3-days full trial price |
| Cons: |
A lot of bad quality videos on the other sites
Most of it is non exclusive as I see it - anyway the guys behind the sites might claim exclusive, but it's not - I've seen it somewhere else.
A little strange navigation.
Low photo resolution
Content is not large |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, this is part of Peter Girls and you get access to the sites within this, but it's not good enough.
First the quality of the videos are mostly bad or blurred - and there is a lot of "comming soon" which I've seen before - a long time ago in previews.
In main site they claim "High Relolution Videos" - i've not found ONE in High yet.
There is a bar claiming Peter Girls Hardcore - there is 1 (one).
Finaly: the videos are split.
Well, it's time to keep looking for alternatives |
|
07-22-07 08:38am
Replies (1)
|
Review
65
|
Legally Teen
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of content for such a new site
All seems to be exclusive. Even quite a few of the girl/models (about 50 all together) are completely new to me.
Solo and some hc - mostly solos, but a lot a really good looking russian/eateuropean teens!
Some seen before - can't say how many at this stage, but it's less than half, maybe.
Best for videos - good quality (640x480) wmv AND NOW AVI too...
Photos: 1500x1000
Watch the preview video at this site - it gives you a good idea. |
| Cons: |
Big problem in navigation right now.
Seems that the site/sites are not quite delt with (see comment)
Have to go around via the preview of the main site called fritzryan.com to find the names of all the girls to look for in the "search-area"
Video-download in 2-3 parts only (hc mostly about 6 parts)
Too long video close-ups for my taste
No zip for photos |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a one-mans-site. Fritz Ryan is an english man who quit job and got divorsed - bought cameras and set out in the world to film and fuck teens in Easteurope and elsewhere..
He claims he does all the stuff himself (maybe a bit like the guy in Dreamstash - but this site has a lot more nerve).
He finds the girls (probably or mostly via agencies or advertise) and film them in what looks like some hotel-suite with different background.
Most of the films are strip/solo/masturbation - SOME of it is hc with the guy himself.
One thing that really turns me on here is, that quite a lot of the girls are magnificent looking easteuro/russian teen who all seems like having a good time. Some with sexy black boots. I've seen a few of these girls before - but not in this good quality and in this sexy kind of strip/solo/masturbation. In the hc-act they even talk in some sweet english accent.
I've not been so exitited about a new site, since I first saw the content of 1ByDay several years ago.
Evem if the site has some seroius navigation problems and videos in parts (easyly joined though), I can recommend this
one to fellow PU's that dig easteuro/russian teens.
It's strange though, that this guy (Fritz Ryan) has 4 sites up now. I've been scanning all of them and it seems like they have the same content. I may be wrong.
NB Score Edited: After I've been able to go through most of the content via their main-site; I downgrade a bit. |
|
08-28-07 07:39am
Replies (2)
|
Review
66
|
Little Mutt
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of content.
A lot of videos hc and solo.
Fairly good update - but not good enough.
Zip for photos
Ok TBP-bargain price. |
| Cons: |
Mostly ordenary and not very sexy looking teens. (Some/a few great ones though)
Average video-quality
Photos 1200x800 but not the best quality.
Too much pseudo-lez |
| Bottom Line: |
Too much laughter and fun - nothing wrong with that.
But when I go for/pay for a pornsite - soft, hard, amateur or whatever I look for something erotic - to turn me on.
I sure adore american teens too - along with the european/easteuropean and there are some faboulos US-teens, but far too few in that catagory in this particular site.
This site tends foremost to the regular/ordenary girl - in some ways like Abby Winters. But I must say - they do not turn me on. Most of them, anyway.
Ok, there are a few very cute and sexy looking teens here - but they are outnumbered by girls who simply are not sexy.
This site tends to the amateur-thing, and thats ok. But I did'nt get that impression when I signed up.
There are too many boring scenes. And too much half-acted lez scenes for my taste. And too many scenes where a girl sits naked/halfnaked and talk to the camera about this and that. Yawn!
The quality of most of the videos are just average.
Well, ok: There are some very good g/b hardcore scenes - and even if I'm also a big solo fan, these hc's are the best at this site.
I see that Little Mutt has some devoted fans here at PU - and with this low points I have no intention of putting down these fans - It's just not my kind of site. So i figure this is as honest a review as possible from my point of view. |
|
09-03-07 08:11am
Replies (2)
|
Review
67
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
LOOK AT BOTTOM LINE FIRST, FOLKS
Great photos and quite sexy video-scenes most with solo girls - only with music background.
The scenes are rather artistic, but still erotic.
All is exclusive, but of course you've seen some of the models somewhere else.
Easy navigation and download. You can download videos in one file or divided - typical size for the whole scene is around 200 mb and in very good quality. |
| Cons: |
The amount is still small/average, but growing it seems.
No hardcore- the few boy/girl scenes are SOFT and only SOFT.
They take away earlier scenes which seems strange. You find a model and the message is that her scenes had been on the site from this date to that and will come back later? A bit odd. |
| Bottom Line: |
First I agreed with Maggie on the score.
An average, but still good site ind the softcore/erotic department with some great looking girls. And the scenes are different from what you see anywhere else.
But it need growth - it won't take long to get through it all.
Anyway it's a fair price and absolutely worth a visit.
-----------------------------
Edited review:
WARNING: WATCH OUT FOR THESE PEOPLE - independent merchants (french) - I've tried to cancel rebill, but no answer via some crazy system. I'll be back with what happens - so now you're warned!
I hate folks like that!
MORE NEWS AMIGOS: NOW I GOT A REBILL-CANCEL AND THEY STOPPED MY ACCESS THOUGH I'VE PAID FOR A MONTH.
LATEST: I told these guys I'd put out a warning/beware at this great place and I got a mail where they state, that I'll not be charged and I'm not welcome at their site in the future.
And, well. I can live with that.
OK, fair is fair - it seems like their Paysite Cash-system screewed up - so I'll give this site back the 78..... |
|
04-09-07 03:32am
Replies (2)
|
Review
68
|
LSG Models
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
First of all: Great looking videos of solo girls - especially for a girl-video-freak.
Sexy teen girls, mostly european/east european.
Good price for what you get.
I'm not sure about updates at this early stage, but the amount has rissen lately - it seems. After checking out the site earlier this year.
Videos are generally better than photos - the atmosphere/color in the videos are great. |
| Cons: |
It's quite a newer site, so the amount of stuff here is still average, but ok for the price.
I agree with ofter PU-users that the way they number the photos in zips or confusing and, yeah, not good. And watermarks two places in a photo is nonsens.
Download speed needs work.
Videos are split up in 2 og 3 files which makes the amout seem larger - and there is no full download for a whole scene. Thats the most irritating about this site. I tried to do a movie-join - but could not. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'll probably take some heat again for too high score to this site.
But folks, I love this site just after browsing for a day.
Here are some extremely cute and sexy teens.
Their videos are top. Something in between Teen Dreams, Nubiles and European Glamour Girls - BUT this LSG-site has something special about their girl-videos.
If you try to brows the preview you'll see some fascinating young and slim teens - and some I've not seen anywhere else, like Mia, Juliet and Zoe - not in this great quality of video anyway.
Most videos come in WMV, Quicktime and MPG - and there is also a small file for preview. Average size of video files is 100 MB. Quality is just great.
If these guys keep up the standard and keep the updates comming, well I think. I'll be back and back again.
But please, make the movie-files in whole scenes too!
Follow-Up:
Interaction/feedback sucks - se comment.
I downgrade in spite of some extremely fine girls on video. |
|
08-06-07 08:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
69
|
Mano Job
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site is for fans of tugjobs, handjobs or whatever. And one of the best in it's field.
The amount of videos here are just great - and what you can expect from a "good" site.
Almost 300 videos of (mostly) fine tugjobs - with very different kinds of girls - some quite plain, though.
Some top-porn models included.
Fine video-producing with the GIRL in the front - no f....... cameraman-yap.
Fine bj-bonus site - and one more - not so exiting - bonus site.
Fine - for most videos - quality.
Download speed ok.
Average updates - what seems to be every third day - not impressive, though.
Fine preview - go for that, first - then you get the idea... |
| Cons: |
Misserable navigation - and ditto socalled "search-engine"
One of those site where you just have to keep on pressing the bottum going through the archives.
Some stereotype-style of filming (but generally it's better than average)
Price a bit high.
Too few euro-models - but ok, this is first and last a US-oriented site, so now you know...
Annoying file-names - all have the same, so you got to alter everything after download. |
| Bottom Line: |
Take a look at TBP and the handjob-sites, tugsites and whatever they're called. No more than a 81,5 for the top-rated one.
As somewhat a fan of those hj-sites, I think I've been through them all - untill now Her Sweet Hand was the best.
But ManoJob got a lot more. You get to know the model without any stupid talk from the cameraman, the girls are well guided/edited in the manner of speaking, teasing og talking directly to the viewer.
And that part is very well done here at ManoJob.
It's a pleasure to watch those US-girls talking to the viewer, only - and if you're into sexy-talk, this could be the site for you.
And here is why this site deserves above the 80: Well produced videos with girls remembering that the thing here is like: POV.
And another pros. is the tremendous amount of videos and ditto different types of girls - AND before you get to the hj-act most girls do fine teasing, masturbating and so on - pretty good, all together.
Very fine dealing with the video-files:
You can download every scene in small parts (wmv) or download the scene in three part - and, of course full scene. Typical size for an entire scene is 180-240 Mb.
And finally you can choose to download cumshots only.
But Man: Name those files better for the user to archive downloads - and not name all the files the same.
Photosets: Download vidcaps or fullsize jpegs (1500x1000) not bad.
Bottom line: This is a fine - at the moment maybe the best - handjob site around - if you can do without euro-models - they have a few at ManoJob - no, very few... |
|
02-05-09 07:54am
Replies (4)
|
Review
70
|
MC Nudes
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Before pros:
This is a premiere/opening night, la,la.. of more short reviews from this user:
+ Top of the pops in nice models - a lot of really great models, to be precise..
+ Fine/Great video quality
+ Somewhat a fine variation of models
+ Great photosets - maybe better than vids
+ Zip for sets - AND choice of fine resolutions
+ Exclusive material |
| Cons: |
- Main cons: Repetition!
- Like a couple of other soft core sites MC Nudes seems to have a lot of difficult in renewal of general attraction in both sets and vids.
- They go for 3D now - who cares - for a paysite at PC-level... |
| Bottom Line: |
MC Nudes was once kind of a favorite - for two reasons:
1) Great models
2) Fine quality vids, quality has seems to go further and further - fine.
But generally the content of both vids and sets lacks a lot in "development".... not much new in matter of more sexy videos - of more refined erotica..
MC Nudes has been the same for too many years - in my book and:
It never seems to get off that special way of doing the same style over and over again.
Did not mean to join, but some models I dig, I had to go for - AND: Those models have a lot better/more erotic/more sexy vids elsewhere.
Still it's a 70 - for the quality and models.
Go elsewhere (TBP) than this review for specifics about formats ect..... |
|
07-05-11 08:57am
Replies (2)
|
Review
71
|
MetArt
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Almost a million photos here - and available in top q
+ Maybe the site with the best variation in nude models
+ Quite a lot of models not seen anywhere else - or very rarely
+ Updates - they're up to 4 each day (photosets, mainly)
+ Good price at TBP
+ Good feedback/help from webmaster/webmasters
+ 3 different resolutions for photosets
+ All resolutions have zip for download
+ Ok navigation considering the vast amout of sets/models
+ Quite a lot of new models updating - and different photographers
+ Photosets are still getting more erotic/sensual and less artistic |
| Cons: |
- Videos are still not great, alas - some even just boring. This is a PHOTOSITE - if you have not been here before: do not forget that.
- Even if the navigation is ok, the browsing at model-pages is a bit clumsy - you get a lot of mouse-work here.
- Too many outdoor shoots for my taste
- Boring and not very erotic g/g sets
- Can be a bit repetitive in the long run |
| Bottom Line: |
Been at this rather special and somewhat great site many times over the years - but never stay more than that one month.
The reason is: After spending hours and days searching for those models that - for you - hit the fan - things seems to fade out. Oh, even if you get those four updates each day - everything seems to get more and more repetitive.
BUT still:
This is the place for collectors of fine nude photosets - AND the quality is getting better and better.
Those 5616x3744 high resolution sets are some of the best quality I've seen anywhere - if your're really hooked on those nude top-photosets, this is it.
The best thing about this photodeal here is, that MetArt are getting more and more new photographers - and even if some of the sets can be that repetitive, the variation is better now that the last time I was here some 9 months ago.
Even if the search might be teasing now and then - even for the experienced PU - there's help:
I like the way all (or most) sets have the choice of biography/full cover view/low/mid/high res AND inside the scene you get the choice of this models other sets - a fine plus.
The videos are the same old problem: not very erotic, not very sexy - maybe even boring.
Very Strange - since also MetArt are going for more videos now.
The quality was BAD in the start - it's getting better - but still: forget about the clips here - and even for this video-freak I join only because of the photos. AND, btw: Some newer videos (Evelyn P - 2010/04/13) are - again - in low quality - WHY?
For outside US PUs you'll get a higher price when trying to join the TBP $ 19.95-deal.
But if you write the webmaster, you'll get a link to that special price - I did - and it took about 12 hours to get the link - MetArt cares about their customers - it seems.
Even if I also this time only stay on for a month (and save maybe 20-25 sets, only), I'll certainly be back later this year...
And a final bottom line: Compared to a lot of shitty sites out there: you can always rely on MetArt - no con here. |
|
04-14-10 05:44am
Replies (3)
|
Review
72
|
MetArt
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam |
| Cons: |
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.
As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.
The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!
I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.
It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny. |
|
01-10-08 06:17am
Replies (15)
|
Review
73
|
Moon Angel
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Well, I joined Moonangel again for the 3. time. This time with Asianflowergirl.com in an offer.
Moonangel got a lot of exclusive photos and some ditto videos - and then again a lot of non-exclusive asian hardcore videos - but the hardcore sections we've seen before. |
| Cons: |
Too few exclusive softcore videos and not very good in quality - especially the older ones.
The updates in exclusive videos are ekstremely rare.
No zip for photos
And again: Like in Asianflowergirl.com the stream-only videos have not worked for the last 24 hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site COULD be good, but the updates in exclusive video section is way too few. There is a lot of great photos soft/exclusive, but honestly: Where is the zip-situation.
I'll NOT be back here for a long time
PS: (04-07-2007): Now it looks like I'm not supposed to be back, my username/password suddenly do not work after a few days membership - and yesterday the joint site Asianflowergirl could not play their stream - it's going great for those people.... |
|
04-06-07 06:26am
Replies (1)
|
Review
74
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Rare stuff with easteuropean/russian teens
Most seems exclusive to this PU - only most
Again - most - in good video-quality (720x576)- all full scene download
3 different qualities - all wmv
Variety of hc, solo and a few girl/girl
Descent Live Cam (only works with Explorer)
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Strange navigation - best way to navigation is via models name/thumb
Medium size content in both pix and video.
Price too high.
No info about updates
Large "tags" on most photos
A lot difference in quality for both videos and photos |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has SOME potential if you're into russian teens - I could also says eateuropeans - but they all seems russian or from some states around.
There's a selection of teens not seen many other places - and some I haven't seen anywhere else before.
Look at preview: Ariel for one, Albina too - or Tina.
There's 73 videos - all in full scene download and most in really fine quality - size between 200Mb-800Mb in "high Quality" - crisp!
Download speed ok - got my 650-700 kb/sec.
A mix of mostly hc, some solo and a few socalled lez.
Maybe 7-10 videos (older) in poor quality.
Photos is not worth to join for (Sorry, Drooler) - the sessions are ok, but quality varries too much.
Some: 1200x900
a few: 3453x2304
Approx: 110 photosets
And most with big "name-tags" i the lower corner..
Was taken in by the preview - but when it comes down to it - I guess only 5-8 of the videos are really great - with some good looking teens - the rest is average or plain worthless - but it's also a matter of taste in girls.
I've seen better russian-teen sites and a lot worse - the site is not a scam - in PU-definition, but it's not great either.
And with a price of $29.95 the bottom line is: Only Average
And just if you really fall for one or two of the teens not seen anywhere else, then...
But do use the preview a lot... |
|
04-30-08 02:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
75
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a PASS with up to 10 different sites
Vast amount of videos/photosets.
Unique content - some exclusive, some on license basis.(a few you can see at Teendreams, but just a few)
Easteuropean/russian/ukranian - and more alike girls.
Great , just great looking teens in the selection.
Very fine quality in videos at 4 of the 10 sites
Photos also ok
1280x720 in hd/great wmv quality
Very rare girls here - some exclusive.
A lot of hc, a lot of fine solo russian girls - and some lez.
Zip for photos on some sites - some NOT!
Do NOT go for photos entirely!
Quite regular updates (just found an entirely new video with Helen/Natasya (see her own site) wow!
Good download speed: I got up to 700 kb/sec. with IDM. |
| Cons: |
Confusing navigation
Too many "check-points" with username/password to every site - even if this is a "pass".
4-5 of the sites are only photos - still some good content - but at some sites no zip for photos.
Confusing set-up where navigation between sites are shitty. Some of the sites are NOT in the same league as others.
Not sure about updates - BUT they seems to be just ok! (They just got an entirely new Helen-video). |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my second try of a completly unknown area of russian/ukrainian content of girls.
But this I can tell:
A lot better sites/pass here than my18teens - see former review.
First there are 3 dammed good sites at this pass:
My Lovely Girls
HDTeensVideo
ExclusiveTeenPorn
The rest is mostly old stuff (no full scenes video) and poor photo sets.
But those 3 sites are worth the 29.95.
The videos are just plain great - some entirely exclusive and some on licensed basis - but all in fine quality.
1280x720 - only in wmv
some older in 720x576
all in full scene downloads AT the primary sites!!
Man, there are some great solo scenes here, that just rocked my world - and that I did not expect.
Yuliya or an unknown Candy - wow!
The best allround site is HD teens video - just fucking amazing!!!
Crisp videos - something like 50 of the best darned easteuropean teen-videos I've seen, yet.
Finaly:
Exclusive Teen Porn: Great all round teen porn with some 50 high-quality videos of both solo and hc. |
|
05-01-08 08:05am
Replies (6)
|
|
