Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
Just took a quick look at this site due to the latest review by exotics4me and noticed that they have a Black Friday deal going on at $7.95 for the first month or $49.95 for a year if anyone is interested.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nearly all solo girl content of some very attractive European models.
- Has some variation in the scenes including speculum and bigger insertions, reminds me a lot of Give Me Pink.
- Very high quality on the video downloads.
- Good download speed (80% of my max)
- Uses Epoch as the biller.
- Downloadable photos in low quality or high quality.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- Pre-checked cross sale at sign-up
- Anytime you’re dealing with a solo site you’re going to run into the potential of the scenes being too similar.
Bottom Line:
I would say to anyone that is a fan of Give Me Pink, you should give this site a try as the shooting style and action itself is similar to it.
The main selling point of a solo site is the looks of the models and how believable they are. These are European models so you’re not going to get a lot of dirty talk or feedback from the models to go by and I think that does hurt a little, at least now in 2020, years ago we didn’t care about something like that. The models here are mostly white with a few darker models. The body types are in-between slender and average. I would say they are all attractive.
There are 979 scenes just on this site and you also get access to 4 other sites. The site has a few scenes that are not solo with a second woman helping but those are rare. I think most people that are into solo porn would be just as happy if there weren’t scenes with more than one woman. The solo content they have here does have some teasing in it and that to me, is a major part of solo porn. If the model can’t get you interested or keep you interested you’re probably not going to watch her masturbate either. You’re not going to find any soon to be major solo stars on this site. That’s also one of the frustrating parts about liking solo porn. You could watch 10 scenes and every other one could be considered poor. I think solo porn brings in your own fantasies and because of that what I may like, you may not like.
These scenes are good enough to give a try if you’re into solo porn. They have nice photo sets with usually 100+ photos in each. The models are often clothed at the beginning of the scenes and at least try to tease. The photos can be downloaded as zips. The video download options stand out as well. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p, 320p and a WMV version as well. Each scene also has a trailer if you want to watch a little before downloading the full scene. If you give it a try make sure to make note of this, the photo zip downloads are in with the video downloads. At first, I didn’t think they had any photo downloads, but they do and give you a low and high option.
The site also has a very deep, I’m going to say, too deep of a search engine that gives you hundreds of options to choose from in your search. I tried a few of the more obscure looking options and got 0 results. That’s why I say it’s too deep. Still the site is part of a full network that comes with 4 other sites including some pissing fetish sites. Their quality is plenty good. Their navigation is as well. There’s not a lot to complain about and they also use Epoch as a biller so it’s easy to subscribe and cancel.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone.
Cons:
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Over 950 solo scenes of mostly attractive US and Euro girls pleasuring themselves.
Straightforward site design and navigation, with scenes listed as pages of thumbnails showing title, release date, pussy type and rating. Scenes can be filtered by multiple category tags of which there are many. Search function works well.
Site works well on mobile devices with previous and next scene links in scene detail page.
Scene detail page provide streaming, downloading and viewing photo slideshow, also model name, release date and scene duration. Can rate the scene, leave comments and add scene to favourites. Clicking model name brings up the her info page showing detailed info and her scenes.
Model gallery shows a list of paged thumbnails with alphabetic filtering, or can filter by pussy type. Can also select model name from dropdown list. Model thumbnails also feature pussy close-up.
Cons:
PROS (cont'd)
Videos can be downloaded as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 320p, photosets can be downloaded as ZIP files, either high or low quality.
Good download speeds with no download limits and downloaded videos are good quality with reasonable file size.
Membership discount via PU and other links found with google.
Easy signup and subscription cancellation via Vendo (but see cons).
CONS
Signup page a little confusing - the username and password fields are pre-filled with random username and password, but you can just delete those and choose your own, so long as each are at least six characters long.
Pre-checked cross-sells on sign-up page.
Links to pages are a bit slow - clicking a link results in 5 or so second pause before the page loads, but once loaded the page is responsive.
The filter tags are not alphabetically sorted, making location the tag you want more difficult.
Scene listing thumbnails don't indicate which scenes are favourites.
At 1600x1071, high quality photos aren't.
Bottom Line:
If you're a pussy worshipper then you'll love this site, though but I do think the Pussypedia feature is just a gimmick to distinguish it from other sites. Oddly the scene detail pages don'tmention the pussy classification at all.
It also includes access to other sites in the Puffy Network which is the parent site.
The site is easy to use and functional though I found the tagged categories to be sometimes inaccurate when using them to track down scenes I'd be interested in, so you're probably better off just browsing all the scenes and picking from that. Having said that, I'd rather have the option of selecting scenes by tag than not have.
The Pussypedia classifies a woman's pussy as either Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry - the detailed descriptions for each are interesting enough but at the end of the day, I'm less focussed on the type of pussy and more focussed on the woman as a whole, hence my opinion that it's a marketing gimmick for the site - I'm sure others will disagree :)
About the scenes:
-scenes are solo, starting off with the girl stripping and playing with herself, using her fingers or a selection of toys. Some scenes feature no toys at all, just the girl using her fingers to stimulate her clit or finger her pussy or asshole.
-there are a few DP scenes in that the girl has something stuck in either hole whilst fingering or thrusting something else into the other hole.
-due to the selection of toys, there's plenty of variety in the all solo scenes, though I did spot at least one scene where the camera man's fingers make an appearance to finger or play with the girl's pussy.
The featured toys/tools range from large to small dildos, large and small suction devices (which for a Puffy Peach distends the pussy quite a bit), some speculum-type inserts that open up the pussy for an interesting look inside whilst at the same time stimulating the labia, to vibrators used to stimulate the clit or inside pussy and clit simultaneously.
-some toys are large and fill her pussy or ass, others are slender/shiny which tend to be used in the ass.
-some scenes feature "chunky" balls on a string that are inserted and swallowed up one-by-one by the pussy, then slowly pulled out using the tiny bit of string dangling outside. Some scenes feature an inflatable dildo.
-usually the scenes end with the girl cumming and sometimes pissing.
-scenes average about 20 minutes long, though some are over 30 minutes and some are as short as 10 minutes. For the lingerie lovers out there, quite a few scenes feature stockings and panty-hose which for me, nearly always adds to the hotness.
-scenes are well produced and good technical quality, with good camera angles and close-ups of the pussy action.
-some scenes feature pissing, which some folk will like but it's not really for me, but having said that, when a girl cums she'll often need to pee so I guess it's all part of the action in some cases.
The photosets are the weakest part of the site, with no proper high-quality/resolution photosets available and the so-called high quality option maxing out at 1600x1071 pixels. The low quality pics are 1000x666. Compared with other sites the photos aren't that well lit but as someone more interested in the scene videos, I'm not too bothered about the photos but I mention them here for those for whom photo quality is important.
The signup page offers a choice of full access (USD 9.95 for 30 days, recurring at USD 29.95), streaming only (USD 9.95 per month recurring) or a PAYG option where you purchase tokens used to buy individual scenes, which seems a crazy option given that the smallest number of tokens cost USD 19.95 - to be honest I didn't notice the latter options when signing up and just went with the default full access option for 9.95, which is great value.
Considering the content and price, I recommend this site overall, particularly as it includes the rest of the Puffy Network.
I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem with them.
And cancelling a sub through them, on their website, is simple and easy.
And you automatically get a confirming email of your cancellation, with the date on which your sub expires.
So I think Vendo is excellent, up there with CCBill and Epoch.
I just cancelled a sub to Wet And Puffy today, and it was easy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with the five site Puffy Network.
Interesting pussy classification system.
Pretty big site, 953 videos, with lots to love about it.
Lots of great looking women
Special price on PU of only $14.95 for a month
I loved Lady Dee, what a woman.
Cons:
I saw mostly white women but this is ok. More variety is better.
Bottom Line:
Just the other day there was a poll that asked “How do you like your pussy?” I answered “wet and juicy”. This site is Wet and Puffy and it also answers the question. It is all about hot girls getting off by masturbating. It gives a new meaning to do it yourself.
It comes with Puffy Network, but the other four sites are not ones I cared about as they are focused on women and men having sex together.
One thing I found to be fun was that they have a great way to search by types of pussy.
These are the three pussy types they have on the site: big taco, juicy cherry and puffy peach. I have never heard of doing this and I think this is very creative and original. I have a pretty good idea of what each of these are. Within these you can do a detail search using hairy, pussy piercing, shaved and trimmed pussy. My first choice is hairy juicy cherry. Yummy.
The models get themselves off by using all kinds of dildos, pussy spreaders, toys inserted both vaginal and anal, anal beads and pussy pumps. The action includes lots of pussy close ups, panty play, and my favorite one, which is opening up those pussy lips and stretching them.
The orgasms look realistic and not fake, unlike many porn sites. This is very much 100% on the hot meter. I think they had a lot of fun making these scenes and I am glad they shared the fun with me and you.
The women are mostly white, and very thin. I loved Apolonia, a Latina from Spain with a Juicy Peach pussy, who had one scene and adored Chloe Lamour, three scenes, who also looks Latina and her pussy is Big Taco. My favorite though was Lady Dee who has a vaguely exotic and very special Asian look. I want to see a lot more of her in lesbian scenes. She has a high level of sexy enthusiasm that I can’t take my eyes off. She had only one scene with her Juicy Cherry pussy that I couldn’t take my eyes off.
The only black models I found were Luna Corazon and Luciana, but they don’t do anything for me.
The site is very friendly to use and anyone can find anything they want without much effort.
They have 953 videos as of today. That is enough to keep me busy for a lot longer than a month, but they are having a deal right now that is a bargain. For only $14.95 you can download all you want for thirty days.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Vendo, Segpay, or CCBill.
--Updates once a week
-The video and photo archives number 942 scenes
-The best video quality is 4K
-Photo quality is 3400x2300. At least 100 photos per set.
-A list 20 something, thin Euro porn stars
-All scenes have great production values
-There are no download limits.
-Easy to follow, logical site layout
Cons:
-The site selects your user name and passwords randomly. I don’t consider this a major con, just an annoying one.
-Updates scroll down endlessly. Works better on a cell phone or tablet than on a pc.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy is a site that focuses on female masturbation scenes. Female friends of mine that like porn, find the videos stimulating and enjoy watching them. Porn producers take note-they want and are looking for a site comparable to this with straight men masturbating. The ones that exist are not interesting as they for gay men.
Speaking as a heterosexual man, I liked the site. The models use dildos of various sizes and types, metal spreaders, toy insertions both vaginal and anal, anal beads and pussy pumps which is very unusual and make the pussy look huge. The only thing I would have liked to have seen are scenes with speculums. The action includes lots of pussy close ups, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, and pissing.
The filters for the site give a pretty good idea of what you will get. These are the categories and how many scenes get these tags.:
Big Taco 186, hairy 17, juicy cherry 169, puffy peach 174, pussy piercing 9, shaved 603, shaved pussy 189, trimmed 188, and trimmed pussy 71. Three pussy types are big taco, juicy cherry and puffy peach. They promote the site as the only pussy classification website on the internet.
Most of the models are thin Eastern European porn stars but a few are from Western Europe or the US. Mostly the models are in their twenties and are most definitely well known professionals and not amateurs. Some I recognized are Antonia Sainz, Chloe Lamour, Angel Wicky, Chrsity Charming, Vinna Reed, Angel Piaf, Francys Belle, Charlotte Sartre, Ria Sun, Victoria Sweet, Gina Gerson, Apolonia, Luna Corazon, Eva Berger, Arwen Gold, Rachelle Richey, Marley Brinx, Lady Dee, Sindy Vega, Eufrat, Lorena, Beata, Abby Cat, Mia Melone, Miela aka Marry Queen, Nikky Thorne, Satin Bloom, Caprise, and Zafira, This is quite a quality lineup.
Updates are once a week and the archive is huge with over 942 scenes. The site layout is easy to follow and the downloads had no broken links or download limits. There is ability to use advanced searching, which is using more than one tag. An example would be American, big taco, blond. Four scenes appear.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Choice of join options $14.95 full access or $9.95 streaming per month. Multi-month and annual memberships are also good value.
Payment options include Paypal with Epoch.
A membership at Wet And Puffy includes access to The Puffy Network.
Exclusive Content. Wet And Puffy updates once a week with a new scene and accompanying photo set, the network as a whole gives you around 15 new updates per month.
Photo sets available as high quality or low quality with a zip download for each.
Videos with 6 download options ranging from 320p to 4K and 4 streaming options from 320p to 1080p.
No problems using my download manager, (I use an old version of Firefox with DTA)
Unique file names with name of model and set name.
Cons:
I could not find a way to view the HQ photos within the site, clicking on a thumbnail opens the photo to the size of your browser with no way to expand it that I could see so the only way to view the HQ pictures is to download the zip.
Lack of variety in shoot location, I don't recall seeing a single outdoor shoot.
Many models only have 1 update.
Content can become a bit repetitive after a while.
The site lacks an advance search tool.
Bottom Line:
As a fan of solo content Wet And Puffy was the main site of interest for me within The Puffy Network which is made up of 5 sites, the others being Wet And Pissy, We Like To Suck, Simply Anal & Euro Babe Facials. Wet And Puffy is primarily a solo masturbation site which promotes itself as the only pussy classification website on the internet. They categorise their models by the three different pussy types which they describe as a Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry.
The site has been online since 2009 so has built up quite a large collection over the years, at the time of writing this review there are 654 models in 907 movies with matching photo sets. As you can tell from the ratio of models to movies most models only have one update with very few models having more than two. The network as a whole gives you access to 1757 scenes.
The members area itself is well laid out and uncluttered with just the one banner ad right at the bottom of the page. If you go to the models page the girls are displayed 20 per page across 33 pages with nice large thumbnail preview pictures of each one and tabs to change how they are displayed from most recent to most popular or by pussy type. You can also click on a letter of the alphabet displayed across the top to filter them alphabetically or there's a drop down menu from which you can simply select any model by name. On each model's page you will find some brief biographical details such as nationality, age, height, weight, breast size, etc. along with large preview thumbnails of her scenes. Hovering your mouse pointer over these will provide you with a brief preview of the action. Once you click through to a scene you will find a nice written description of the action and a list of clickable tags, all the download options listed with their file sizes along with the run time and release date. Scroll down a bit and you have all the photo thumbnails and zip download links on the same page. You'll also find a tab where you can find the videos broken up into 1 minute clips, not something you see so often these days. You can rate the scenes, add to favourites and leave comments.
The collection of models has little in the way of diversity, they are virtually all white, slim, European and in the 18 to mid 20s age range and include many well known names. One of my all time favourite models Lola (a.k.a. Dido) is the top ranked model on the site and one of the few models to have more than one or two scenes here. A couple of my other long time favourites Caprice and Monika Vesela also have a couple of scenes each.
The content itself is nearly all solo masturbation with just a handful of lesbian scenes thrown in. The girls usually start out wearing some clothing or lingerie before teasing and stripping and then getting to work on her pussy, usually some fingering and masturbation before the toys come out, not only dildos and vibrators but various other contraptions such as pumps, speculums, and spreaders. Scenes can often include some anal play and peeing. I kind of feel the same way about this site as I did about ALS Scan several years ago, I enjoy the scenes up to a point but when the girls start using the speculum or pump on their pussy it becomes less erotic for me and more gynaecological. These solo scenes usually run around 20 to 25 minutes long. The 1080p scenes I downloaded had an 8000k bitrate and looked excellent on my 24 inch monitor. Each video comes with a matching photo set, the most recent ones being sized at 2267 x 3400.
Overall a decent site if you enjoy this type of content, the only downside for me being the lack of diversity in the models and lack of variation in shoot locations made it all seem a bit repetitive and formulaic at times.
Just clicked the link and got a price of $14.95 for one month recurring at $29.95 per month. They also offrr an annual price of $60.00 ($5.00 per month).
Congrats to WAP for having the worst and least friendly web design!
The video file names don't contain model names. On the video pages "select" and "copy" are not allowed. What does this mean? If you want to save a video with model name, you actually have to type the name. Not copy and paste. Type.
Whose idea is it to make it as hard for paying customers as possible?
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price
-The video and photo archives number 792 scenes
-The best video quality is 4K
-Photo quality is 3400x2300. At least 100 photos per set.
-Top notch 20 something, thin Euro porn stars
-Part of five site network that has 1476 scenes in total
-The videos are exclusive.
-All scenes are well done and look professional
-No download limits.
-Easy to follow, logical site layout
-Links to discounts to other sites
-Bill through Epoch or CCBill
Cons:
-Updates are too few with 10 updates per month. The network has about three updates a week.
-The site selects your user name and passwords randomly. You get something like an alphabet soup of upper and lower case letters and some numbers.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that specializes in female masturbation scenes. Mostly they use dildos, but in some scenes they use metallic spreaders. I would have liked to have seen more scenes using a speculum, but there was only one. Mostly the action was enjoyable and the models seem to be having a bit of fun as well.
One thing unique, I think, about this site is a description of the type of vulvas (pussy) the models have. There are Big Taco, Puffy Peach, and Juicy Cherry. Now that they went that far, I would have preferred if they had focused on visuals of the types, but instead they opted to focus on the action. Even the photos are action oriented, not visually pussy oriented.
Most of the models are thin Eastern European porn stars but a few are from Western Europe or the US. Mostly the models are in their twenties and are most definitely well known professionals and not amateurs. The models are nearly all very thin and white, but there are two black models, one from Brazil and one from the US. I would have liked a bit more variety, but this is par for the course for a European website. Further, as such you get little to no talking in any language.
The videos are available in quality as high as 4K. My choice for downloads were the ones that are 1920x1080 and 8,000 kbps. This is as good as it gets on any site without getting into 4K, which has much bigger files and may not play on your monitor. It doesnt play on mine.
The site layout is easy to follow and the downloads had no broken links. The site is uncluttered, but there is a link to discounts from other sites. Every time you login there is a popup pushing a membership to VIPissy, which is not part of the network, but has the same ownership.
The site has plenty of videos with an archive of 792 videos and picture sets at the moment, but is growing with updates twice a week, 10 per month.
There is a photoset of very high quality screenshots for each video. The network that this is a part of has five sites and 1318 movies, so you get quite a bit with your membership. The other sites may or may not be to your taste, as I did not care for all of them either. There is Wet and Pissy, We Like to Suck, Eurobabe Facials, and Simply Anal, which has a lot more than anal scenes. There is a PU discounted price as well, so you get both quantity and quality at a very reasonable price.
I've found that if you choose the "only picture sets" option for browsing the collection, sooner or later it defaults to either the "All" (videos, too) option and transports you to a different time and place or to a parental warning-type page.
When I tried the "All" option, things worked OK.
However, the gallery browsing, page-by-page within a gallery, doesn't always work correctly either. I finally just went to downloading what I liked after a while and skipped the detailed photo viewing.
It's not a bad site, content-quality wise, but navigating it you could wind up like Henry Hudson looking for China.
ragingbuddist's review sums the site up accurately
$19.95 plus two bonus sites that are of similar quality. They stay true to their theme wet and puffy with pretty neat classifications. Well worth a peak or crack...
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ PU discount
+ Excellent video and picture quality
+ Clear and easy navigation
+ Access to 2 new W&P sites - wetandpissy.com and weliketosuck.com
+ Good download speed
+ Models categorized by Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry
+ Offered $19.99 nubiles at signup
Cons:
- Music intro and outro on video override natural sound
- Lack of variety in settings
(Yes, only two cons!)
Bottom Line:
LAYOUT:
Home page has typical tabbed navigation
Models - list of models in no apparent order with "Models by letter" option
Updates - Episodes in order of release
Requests - User feedback form
Extras - A small mix of picture sets, videos and monthly highlights
Bonus - The usual flash videos, these from various sites. Count at time of membership: 20
Cams - The usual free vids with option to buy private time.
Interviews - Short Q&A with models, averaging 2-5 questions each
Search - By Name, Pussy Type, Action (Anal, Blowjob, Lesbians, etc.) and Galleries or Video
Contact - Not surprisingly, contact info for the site
TECHNICALS:
Video:
HD MP4 1440x810 Average Bitrate 5700+ kb/s
WMV 1440x810 ~4800+ kb/s
MP4 720x406 ~1200 kb/s
FLV 640x360 ~1600 kb/s
Clicking on file type shows file size - nice!
Pictures:
Each set available in 2 sizes. Newest up to 2800x1867, oldest around 1600x1064. All are also available at 1024x769.
Watermarks on pictures are subdued and gray - not distracting at all
Zip files available
Miscellaneous:
Homepage lists number of models, scenes, pictures, videos as well as the hours of video online.
Download speeds seemed to range from 1 to 3MB/sec without download manager, moderate improvement over Save As downloads.
For as good as it is, there's really not much to say about this site. I think it's top notch in most respects. A fairly clean layout, simple navigation and quality video and pictures. My first impression was that it looks a lot like InTheCrack with less closeups and more girl next door type models. That was a nice touch for people like me who prefer amateurs to professionals. It features mostly solo action with heavy accent on toys, insertions and watersports. There are also a few lesbian scenes, some blowjob scenes and a couple of hardcore scenes. Most models have only one video with an associated picture set, a few have more. The only major issue I see is their having a music intro that plays into a video for about a couple of minutes then fading out. Same issue at the end of some video, with music starting in before the video ends. Once I got past the music intro issue, I was really impressed with the quality of the video - about as clear as I've seen anywhere. A lesser quibble is the lack of variety in their settings - everything looks like it's shot in the same house. A NICE house with a lot of rooms, but still the same house.
Something else that grabbed my attention was the watermark on the pictures. They stood out because they DON'T stand out. They're grayed out and don't detract from the picture at all. That's something I wish more sites would do. There's nothing that ruins a picture more than a bright splash of color to take away from the subject matter. Definitely not the case here.
So, with not much to criticize, it's obvious that I highly recommend the site. Solo action fans and watersport fans should definitely take a look at this one!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many top-notch and popular models
Excellent quality videos
Most videos are full 1080 HD
Good photo sets
Good navigation
Wide variety of models
Lets and lots of masturbation...
Pussy classification system is a hoot!
Lots of details about many of the models
Cons:
Not much variety of activities or sets
5 point voting system seems a bit off
Sort order on many pages seems random
no extra large images (2800x1867 max)
Not much depth (i.e. most models in only one set)
Models are often a little...un-made-up.
Many models don't interact with the camera much
Bottom Line:
Well, the best way to describe this site might be "Forget the foreplay, let's get to it!"
There is very little posing, no glam photography (i.e. not much make-up), not a single "naked girl in the woods" just a whole lot of "Here's a girl. Watch her masturbate!" And masturbate they do! Every single girl! Usually with multiple devices in each photo or video set.
This is also one of those sites where you are so drawn in by the masturbation scenes that you won't notice some of the other features right away. There are a lot of interview transcripts that seem reasonably genuine, but the translation from Russian seems a little too perfect to be 100% correct. They are entertaining, though. There are both "bonus" and an "extras" sections that contain additional sets, some of which are from other sites. Ah, yes, there is a LOT of cross selling advertising going on, but thankfully the webmasters have kept the ads to small banners except at the very bottom of some of the pages. The sites that are advertised are all quality sites and a few have "special offers" that one would not get if one were to go straight to, say, Twisty's. (The offers are about the same as the discounts the PU.com...)
There are a couple of bonus sites: "We like to Suck" and "Wet and Pissy". If that doesn't paint a picture for you, quit sniffing glue. Thay have basically the same layout and quality but are a little more specialized. Not really my cup of....whatever.
The webmaster and photo teams do a really good job of creating a genre and sticking to it. The scenes are well lit, well focused and generally good quality. They are all entirely indoors, apparently in a hotel bedroom or bathroom with a few scenes in a home someplace. In some of the sets, one of the videographers, who I'm pretty sure is not exclusive to this site, gets into the action a little by putting a finger in various orafices of the models. I'm not sure I like this style and can't tell if the models do either.
The models are for the most part, right out of ALScan or Twisty's. The top models here are on those other sites, too. Generally pretty, with maybe a few that are not. Oh, and the "real factor" is pretty high here. Make-up is minimal. Lot's of very shiny faces and plenty of pimples visible just about everywhere you can imagine. One girl has a boot shaped bruise right across her butt! If you like "real" this is the place for you!
The "acting" is OK. Female orgasms in porn is like watching professional wrestling. Is it real? Who cares! It's entertainment!
The stats, curiously posted across the top on th ehome page to make it really easy for me to reference, are:
Models: 507
Scenes: 640
Videos: 622
Pics: 39,138
That is not a lot of material compared to some other sites and it doesn't take a math wiz to see that over three quarters of the models only have one photo set and one video. The price isn't bad, though, so I would say it is worth it.
Navigation is pretty straightforward. You can sort models alphatically or on popularity...but the order of the models seems to change and the ranking system, wich goes to 5, seems a little narrow and somewhat inaccurate. There are two image download sizes and a handful of video format options. There are also a few page preferences like number of thumnails on a page. I would like to see larger image options and the ability to download things directly from the model or scene summary page.
OK, bottom line: If you are into solo mastubation videos, this site is certainly worth a visit.
This is a very good site with great image quality, but I didn't like that there was about one photo set per model. I think this site has a lot of potential and I'd love to see a lot more pussy shots.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The video quality is excellent, especially with the newer videos! Models are very attractive and young (18 to 25). Photo sets are very good quality, and do not appear to be vid caps. Site navigation is good. Updates with 2 new models a week on average. The site is a little different than most porn sites. They claim to be the only pussy classification site on the web, which is probably true, although I think maybe there should be more than 3 types (LOL). The 3 categories they have are the "puffy peach" (model has fat labia majoria that hide her clit and labia, and create "pussy cleavage"), the "big taco" (model's clit and labia are visible in a standing pose), and the "juicy cherry" (model's clit and labia are long and hang down). Each model starts out with one video and one or two photo sets. The videos involve a sexy strip and then some pussy play, either with fingers or toys. I had no problem logging into the two bonus sites.
Cons:
Many models have only one video and one photo set. I don't understand why--maybe they dont book them for a full days shoot. I would definitely like to see more sets of many of their models shot in their style. The videos do seem to get a bit repetitive and similar after a while. It would be nice to see more of the girls masturbating to orgasm. There is a little more pissing than I like--thats not something I'm into.
Bottom Line:
Excellent video quality with attractive young models. A lot of archived content. Some of the bigger names in Euro porn stars can be found here including the gorgeous Caprice. A few of the things you will find here with regularity are pussy close ups, pussy pumps, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, anal beads used up and down on the pussy, and pissing. A pussy focused site that is pleasantly different from the standard photo/video porn site. That along with the beautiful girls and high video/photo quality make Wet and Puffy definitely worth joining for a month. The free tour is pretty good if you've never been there before.
If you have an interest in Wet And Puffy, don't believe their offer on their sister site that says if you join Wet and Pissy, your subscription will give you access to two other sites; Wet and Puffy and We Love To Suck.
Because of that offer (and because of the good review by oldfizzywig) I signed up today for Wet And Pissy.com, both because I liked the preview site and because it would provide access to Wet And Puffy.
It turns out that the offer is totally BOGUS - You are required to buy a separate membership to access Wet And Puffy. The login tab is not functional and can only be made functional by buying a separate subscription.
Worse, they offer absolutely no customer support of any kind.
I suggest that PU blacklist all three sites operated by Wet And Puffy, Inc. for its deceptive business practices.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Provides what it advertises.
- Video download formats: FLV, MP4, WMV, MP4-HQ
- Video download example: 17'46": FLV 301mb 720x406, MP4 225mb, WMV 806mb 1280x720, MP4-HQ 1035mb 1920x1080.
- Picture downloads - ZIP file. Usually two sizes 1027x769 or 2800x1867, but sizes do vary.
- Crisp clear images and videos
- Statistics 418 Models, 540 scenes, 547 videos, 28458 pictures
- Natural breasts - many are A or B cup.
- Non-Member intro shows a full face picture (topless with small pussy insert) of each model.
- Trusted billing - CCBill or Epoch.
- Appears to update 3 times per week.
Cons:
- All videos seem to follow same theme: Musical background, model strips, model plays with pussy, may use toys
- Sort by Newest or "most popular", Select by All or "pussy type", most videos have tags but one can not select or sort by tags
- Older videos are 640x480 WMV
- Some of the Girls seem uninterested
- Interview section is very says almost nothing, and is text not video/audio.
- There is a tab on most pages for "CAMS" but it is a dead link.
Bottom Line:
Good clear images and videos. Lots of closeups.
Most models are Eastern European. Of the 24 most recent updates the Country of Origins are: England 1, Czech Republic 10, USA 1, Poland 2, Hungary 2, Romania 1, Austrira 2, France 2, Netherlands 1, Switzerland 1, Greece 1. Models appear to be in the 18 to 25 year age range.
Lots of Dildo play. Many Pussy pumps, I suspect this may be why its "puffy". Most girls either use a lotion or spit on their fingers, this must be the "wet" part of the name.
There are a number of videos of the girls pissing. For fans of this, like me, it will be a turn on, as these are often closeups.
I just read the TBP review (quite positive) and checked out the preview site (Very well done) and am about to take the plunge. But at $30 the price exceeds my normal maximum. So before I do I would like an encouraging comment or two about the site. Yes, I'm into pussies and appreciate the site's classification scheme and the sample content. I also like the the statistical summary on the preview site and the variety of excellent models.
So it won't take much to make me sign up if there are no negatives of consequence reported by my fellow PU members.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
