| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
FTV Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Quality of camera work
Beautiful models
Constant flow of new material
Excellent videos |
| Cons: |
Hard to find any negative side
Cost is somewhat high |
| Bottom Line: |
Excellent site that has multiple sessions with their models. I would rate this as one of the best experiences for the user. |
|
04-05-07 01:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
FTV Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly very attractive girls, with high quality videos.
The girls all seem at ease with the photographer, and while performing, masturbating etc, they seem to forget they are on camera making it all the more real.
Easy navigation, with explanation with each model as to how "hard" the set is.
Ecellent volume of content. |
| Cons: |
Format has not really changed since the site started.
Not enough girl on girl action, which is a shame since many of the models seem to like other girls.
No way of navigating by subject, e.g.girls who squirt.
It would be nice to see the occasional older woman as well as the young models. |
| Bottom Line: |
If what you like is seeing pretty girls madturbating, exposing themselvs in public, and inserting toys and other objects into their pussies, this site is hard to beat.
A good range from soft core photos to hard core videos to please all tastes. |
|
03-12-07 12:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
FTV Girls
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality videos.
+Beautiful selection of young models, with different body types and sizes. They don't all look the same.
+Intimate videos with Real Orgasms.
+Lots of public nudity
+Normally 3-4 galleries per model update, around 60 images per gallery.
+2-4 videos per model update. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey ($29.95 per month, I got offered $20 per month when I went to cancel)
-Images could stand to be bigger. Currently are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. Not as high quality as some other sites.
-They do have BigPics, where are 3000x4000 or 2000x3000 but it's a seperate page from it's self and no way to know from the model update if they are available for her or not.
-No search function. Have to go by update or models first name.
-Not all models are actually first timers. For example a recent update was Franziska, who I saw alot on ALS Scan when I was recently a member to there.
-Older videos and pictures not that good of quality.
-Only updated on average 1-2x per week.
-Some videos are behind the scenes of the photo shoot, so you hear the great 3,2,1 camera click. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV is a site that I was a member of awhile back and liked back then but it was a bit too pricey for me. The site can get alittle too extreme for me (huge toys or fisting, etc) but decided to give it another try.
Photo's: In todays day and age of high resolution and high quality, FTV's photos are step behind the competition. Current updates photos are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. While updates in 07 where, 797x1200. 06 where 712x1072. So as you can see, while FTV keeps improving every year, it still doesn't compare to sites that have 3000 or 4000px images. But FTV does offer BigPics. They are 3000x4000px or 2000x3000px. But it's only of select galleries/models. I don't know why FTV doesn't do what ALS Scans do and offer two download sizes, normal res and high res. Since offering BigPics proves they have them available. For $30 a month, not offering them as standard is unacceptable.
Videos: 08 videos are available in 8000kb/s HD WMV's, 3000kb/s WMV's & Divx vidoes. Anything prior to December 07, is available in 2100kb/s WMV & Divx. The 8000kb/s videos are great quality, unfortunately my pc can't play them smoothly. So I'm stuck with the 3000kb/s. The quality is pretty good but not as good as some 720p videos from other sites. According to FTV's site, here are the following specs:
WMV Ultra HD 1440x1080 Resolution 8000kb/sec bitrate
WMV HD 720x480 Resolution 3000kb/sec bitrate
WMV 640x480 Resolution 700-2000kb/sec bitrate
Some videos are behind scenes of the photoshoots and you get to hear the lovely 3,2,1 and then the snap of the camera. However the cameraman does do a decent job of not talking too much, unless it's the interview video, he normally just lets the girls do what they want.
The videos are normally split up into 5-10 5-7 min secments. No option for full scene download.
The site could use a update in navigation. As of now you can either list by update or by model name in alphabetical order. There no way to search for a name or to find a model with a certain body type.
Some models are also not first time video girls, some can be seen on other pages, before their FTV shoots. However the models like that seem to be few.
In closing I really like FTV and it's probably one of my favorite sites. However there are changes that need to be done to break the low 90's number. They need to start putting the images up in their default resolution, instead just putting select images in a zip and slapping them up on the BigPics page. Add the user forum and drop the price. Right now $29.95 is flat out too high for any site that isn't a network site.
If they would do both of those and drop the price to $5-10 then I think it could easily be a mid to high 90's site.
In closing if you like public nudity or like real orgasms, then I'd recommend you give FTV a shot. |
|
12-30-08 04:58pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
29
|
FTV Girls
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots and lots of beautiful women
- Seeing all kinds of major stars who you know from hardcore movies in softcore, some before they were famous
- FTV toy scenes are almost as good as hardcore
- Very good quality picture sets and high quality video
- Seeing the girls' personalities since most have at least one clip that is talking/interviewing |
| Cons: |
- You won't see many models who have a lot of curves on here...very slim women
- The pro of interviewing can become a con after seeing every girl answer the same way for the most part, "I love sex all the time, anywhere"
- Site can become very repetitive
- Nothing close to hardcore and even g/g scenes are few and far between
- Some of the girls are very shy and leave you teased more than pleased |
| Bottom Line: |
I come back to FTV about once every 6 months, this is the 4th or 5th time I've been a member. FTV was one of the first sites I bought a membership to.
The first few times you see a model use the FTV toy, you will really be excited and impressed, but then it gets repetitive as well. If the girls don't want to try other girls, maybe at least, get two in the same room masturbating at the same time. There really are a lot of major stars on here, that are mostly going by different names than you know them. Some may even slip by without you even realizing who they are.
These points are hard to decide if they are bad things or good things. There are other girls on here who you have never seen before and considering that they look to by shy after watching their videos, you start to think you won't ever see them again on video. One part that is good is that the videos and masturbation is very real. Most of the girls become soaked right there for you to see. Maybe a standout video for me is Amy Ried, who is now into hardcore, in her FTV video she gets about as wet as I have seen a woman get in a solo video, and you actually tell she is geniunely embarrassed by it. Eva Angelina is also here (no glasses sorry fellas), Sativa Rose, Jenevieve Jolie, Shy Love but those right there are going to be by far the curviest and are in the minority. I would still recommend it, I keep going back, so something must be there.
Follow-Up:
Recent HD videos have boosted my original score by 4 points. Incredible quality! |
|
04-20-07 03:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
30
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
11-14-18 12:56pm
|
Review
31
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A large site that has returned more to its amateur roots.
- In my opinion, the best site for those who like public flashing, touching, as these once favorites have now returned in nearly every new update.
- Models are starting to become more varied in appearance. There's been several busty-type models added recently (Darcie is a favorite). Also seeing more dark haired models, there was a time when it seemed like 90% of new models on here were blonde.
- Video and photo quality are both excellent, zips for downloading photo sets.
- Lots of sporty girls, flexible, working out, dancing.
- Site navigation has improved greatly. |
| Cons: |
- The days of the more extreme FTV seem to be over. You rarely see the giant dildos or the FTV Toy, but it's not a con for me, could be for others.
- Webmaster or whoever programs the site goes a little overboard with the use of tags, really, it's not public nudity just because the model gets nude in a private backyard in Arizona.
- And the big one, the videos are still split into parts. I don't know how many times I've reviewed FTV or commented about it, but despite all the reasoning I've heard, "The different clips show the progression of the scene" was one, and another was, "Some people don't like masturbation, others don't like teasing, the clips allow users to pick just the ones they like". So does the fast-forward and rewind button. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV has always been an up and down site for me. Many times as a member, the up and down status happened from day to day. I admit, one of my favorite niches in porn is public nudity/flashing and even better if the model slips a little masturbation in too.
I like the combination of danger/excitement/arousal you see from the models in the public nudity scenes. And one really big plus for FTV is the models, at least to me, are becoming more and more amateur. I'm sure it's no different than it used to be where someone like Eva Angelina appeared here early in her career then went on to be one of the most prolific porn actresses of all-time.
FTV to me is the best public nudity site available that is still updating. So if public, exhibitionism is your thing, you should try it out just for those scenes.
The site's navigation has improved thanks to a new design in the member's area. New might not be the right word, but it was new to me when I joined 3 months ago. I had been away from this site since roughly 2010. It could still be improved by better tagging. All scenes now have tags across the top of their description. These are nicely done bold and bright tags that make it easy to see if a scene has something in it you might like. Some examples:
Nu! = Public Nudity, O = Real Orgasm, Ex = Extreme Scene and so on. These are very useful except for one thing. Since adding this tagging system they've went back and tagged every scene on their entire site. I will give them credit for not just throwing every tag possible on every scene, but there's the occasional misused tag that can be frustrating.
The frustration is made worse by the videos being cut into parts. Instead of just downloading one big file then scanning through it for the part you're most interested in, you have to download 4-10 parts then open each one and look for the part you're interested in.
If that's not enough frustration, the videos here are such high quality that it makes you wonder if they realize stopping to load another video is breaking up the continuity of the scenes? An example: Cayton Cayley (Candice) has a scene where she's flashing in a car repair garage. There's men all around and she's getting more aroused by each one that look at her. Then ... the video stops. Load the next one, watch the FTV logo for 2-5 seconds, video starts and she's walking to a room in the back where men are going to watch her masturbate. That's not only senseless, but it's illogical. One of the few believable things I've heard behind the reasoning of breaking the scene up is "Videos are shot in different locations". While I'm sure video editing software could piece those together still, I can at least see how one moment the model is nude in public, the next she's in a bed getting ready to masturbate, could also make the videos less natural-feeling, but the one I used above was in the same building. As are many others.
My guess is it will never change. It's been this way for over 10 years. Outside of that fairly big problem, the site delivers. The change from some extreme scenes to hardly no extreme scenes didn't bother me.
The size of the site can be overwhelming. I don't have near as much time to view/download porn as I used to so I've ended up staying at FTV for 3 straight months trying to rebuild my collection of their content. Updates are once a week and include videos and photos of one model. It's also still a great site for collectors since a lot of well-known porn stars including hardcore, extreme ones, were here on FTV early in their careers, showing some innocence and playfulness, you don't see from them in their newer work.
The interviews are often funny and show the model's personality away from being a model. I would even wonder how many models have helped/hurt themselves with these interviews?
I know there's been reviews and comments about the download speed being poor, but I haven't experienced any problems over the 3 months. My download speed on here is roughly 90% or higher of what it should be. Just tested it again before writing this review.
Overall, this is how I see this site: There's high-quality photos and videos. Decent download options on the videos and zips for the photos. The improved navigation (since 2010) makes the site much easier to use. Even the types of models have improved over the last year or so (subjective). But there's always that one but revolving around the split videos. I can say I took off 6-8 points for the split videos. It creates too much of a frustration situation. I can either download the clips I know I'll like and skip the others, which will make me wonder what I missed or I can just download them all, which is what I end up doing.
Even with the frustration, it's the best at public nudity and at finding very attractive amateur models. |
|
12-22-15 01:38am
Replies (2)
|
Review
32
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive, often gorgeous models, often shot early in their careers. Upscale location(s) for the photo shoots help out too.
-Excellent video quality! The HD videos are really good!
-I really like the pussy close up videos-they are very well done.
-Many of the masturbation videos end with real orgasms and oozing girl cum.
-Most of the models have an interview video that does a good job of letting you get to know them a little better. The models can also post a comment on their experience with FTV after the shoot is done.
-They do have occasional lesbian videos which I think are well done. I really liked Malena Morgan and her gf. |
| Cons: |
-the photo sets are almost an after-thought, and although they are pretty good in general, the one thing they lack is size (many are only 1500 px on the long dimension). This is probably my biggest gripe, especially since they have so many really hot models.
-site navigation could be improved with a better search engine. Its organized by update date, and you can search models alphabetically. Having said that, from my perspective there really are no search tags that can reliably find models I really like. You never really know until you watch their videos.
-there seems to be just a few main locations that most of the videos are shot, so you will start to recognize them again and again. One place that they use for most of the outdoor shoots is some type of office building--usually there aren't many people around, so it appears they go out there on the weekends. There is also a nice house (mansion really) that they use for the indoor shoots. Still, more variety would be nice. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV stands for "first time videos", and while it may not be true for every model that FTV was her first porn shoot, its probably not far off. Many of the girls still have a youthful energy and innocence that you usually don't see in your average experienced porn star.
FTV has been around for quite a while, so there is a lot of content to go through if you are a first time member. It took me 4 months to go through the most recent three years or so. The updates only come once a week (one new model, each with about 9 to 12 videos and 4 or 5 photo sets), so its not a site that I would stay joined to forever. Rather, its the type of site that you go back to once a year or so, after your initial membership.
FTV has a few themes that feature heavily in its videos: public nudity and flashing (usually 2 or 3 of a models vids will include this); masturbating with extremely large dildos, vegetables, and/or hands (fisting); and real masturbation videos that often include extreme pussy close ups. The public nudity and extreme insertions don't really do much for me, but I love their masturbation and pussy close up videos. That along with the model interviews, "freshness" of the models, and excellent video quality are what I really liked about this site.
Bottom line: there is a huge amount of quality content here. Definitely worth joining! |
|
12-30-12 05:37am
Replies (5)
|
Review
33
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large amount of beautiful young women and high quality pictures and videos. High definition videos are available for newer content. |
| Cons: |
Most videos are in segments. This can be annoying for downloading a complete scene. The site layout could be a little better; it is pretty much a simple list of latest updates, and then a large (really big) index of each woman. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV is a great website featuring a wide array of women doing their thing to get off. Both the solo and girl-girl photos/videos are in excellent quality. Lastly, some well known porn stars are on here under different names (like Tiffany Taylor is called Celine here). |
|
05-30-08 02:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Real HD videos (Only started in december)
+ Standard video is Good Quality
+ Lots of images for video previews
+ Massive amounts of both Video and Images
+ Great scenes with pulic scenes also
+ Interveiws
+ Download Speed around (600k)
+ Girl Cum (with tasting)
+ Mainly Above average girls
+ Preview Image before Video starts
+ Video decription
+ the camera man doesnt get in camera veiw only talks |
| Cons: |
- No search engine
- Download limit 15g per day (Increased from 5Gig)
- Model names arnt always correct and sometimes made up
- Navigation needs improvments
- No Niches to search from
- Few lesbian scenes
- not enuf updates (every 5 days i think but they are big updates)
- File names are really anoying and are all the same. (see 1a.) |
| Bottom Line: |
One Year Member
This is my fav site and would remended it to anyone.
The some of the girls are totaly amazing and unscripted scenes (as far as i can tell)
They started doing HD videos (which are hd and dont just clame to be)
1a. The file names are totaly anoying and all the videos names have only numbers e.g. 1w.wmv this has to be the most anoying thing in the world as you have to rename the files or you will forget which video is which model. (This is a massive flaw in the site and should be addressed right away)
Improvements: I like the layout but it needs a revamp and it badly needs a niche search engine.
Make the split videos avlible into one complete video.
1a. The file names are totaly anoying and all the videos names have only numbers e.g. 1w.wmv this has to be the most anoying thing in the world as you have to rename the files or you will forget which video is which model. (This is a massive flaw in the site and should be addressed right away)
All My reviews are non profit and 100% honest. |
|
12-26-07 06:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Videos let you get to know the girls by following them around town doing normal activities and talking about themselves.
Video quality has improved considerably over the last year.
Large selection of girls, many never before seen.
Lots of graphic closeups and extended masturbation scenes. |
| Cons: |
Some of the girls have appeared on other sites.
Photo shoots are uninspiring.
Could use more girl girl scenes.
Navigation is somewhat cumbersome |
| Bottom Line: |
Well worth the price of admission. If you have not been to the site in a while, it is worth revisiting for the improved video quality. This really makes a huge difference. |
|
04-21-07 01:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Unreal photography. The girls are HOT. The video quality is excellent. |
| Cons: |
I'm not a big fan of chicks sticking their underwear up their coochie's. Too weird for me. |
| Bottom Line: |
Great site for those with a vagina fetish. I'm a hooter kind of guy and just like the stuff with the girls making out and feeling each other up. Overall, i liked the site and would recommend it to a friend. |
|
01-24-07 01:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Website is easy to navigate.
Each model has been explained with total length of videos, total number of photos, and tags.
You can use tags to make a search on the whole site.
Big archive, has archives dating back to 2002.
Each shoot also have videographer’s comments, explaining the scene. |
| Cons: |
Videos are clipped to shorter scenes and you can download them one by one.
You can also download photo scenes only by scene, not by the model.
Models are amateur, but they are not natural and they don’t act natural. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTVGirls is a site that has been around for a long time. It is one of the best amateur sites out there. There are so many amateur models in their archives and a quite bit of of them are their first shoots.
Different models, tidy website, great archive are some positive sides of the site.
One of the other positive sides are the tags. Each scene has them, and also you can search the site with these tags.
You can find both soft masturbation to extreme fisting scenes on the site.
There are also some girl on girl scenes in the archive, but not so much.
There are so many different outdoor and indoor areas used as well as so many different toys.
It is one of the best sites for photo lovers, as there are many photos with different scenes for each model.
One of the negative parts of the site is, even though girls are amateur, they don’t act natural in the scenes. Some of them have their natural moments, but on most part of the scenes, it is acted. So, if natural is as much as important to you as well as amateur, you may be a little bit disappointed. Still, you won’t be disappointed in the usage of toys, and both soft and hard scenes.
Another negative side is downloading. You can only download scenes one by one, you cannot download the whole models photos and videos at once.
FTVGirls has been one of my favorite amateur sites over the years, and I definitely suggest it to every amateur lover. |
|
07-07-19 02:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
38
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Attractive teen to twenties models
High Quality pics and vids
Great toy action
Fun to see younger models experience intense toys
Lesbian scenes are quality! |
| Cons: |
Not enough audition pics
Not enough selfies
Could use a little more groupsex content |
| Bottom Line: |
Fun models, great erotic photos and vids. Join now; you won't regret it. |
|
05-23-18 06:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
39
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- STUNNING models
- Decent video quality with the last several years in HD
- Video player is good (quality video with little buffering and fast startup); the Scene Jump functionality in particular is greatly appreciated
- Boasts site portability across numerous devices (desktop, tablet, smartphone)
- Downloadable videos in appropriate formats (MP4 for your iPod, Android device, etc)
- Real-life situations (actual public settings, real strangers watching at times)
- Very few fakes (natural, truly "First Time Girl" models)
- Real orgasms including wet pussy
- Some models showcasing special talents (gymnastics, dance, yoga, karate) |
| Cons: |
- They flirted with hardcore but didn't go all the way with the old FTVx.com site redirecting to ftvgirls.com now; that said, they've kept around some of the boy-girl content, and some of it was passible but typical and nothing special
- Same situations over and over again
- Too much dildo/vibrator action for me
- Inadequate search |
| Bottom Line: |
These girls are unbelievably good looking. I'd been visiting the site or seeing pictures from it for four years before finally caving in and getting a subscription. I haven't been able to find a site with a more steady stream of this many incredibly good looking girls. That said, I really wish there was either more hardcore, or that the hardcore they had was better. Real boyfriends, creampie, etc. They're doing that now with some of the other sites of this higher quality. The settings do get old from time to time, but the situations and the girls as well as their reactions do keep things fresh enough that it doesn't too much matter, really. You will love how they will sometimes bring a girl back after years and see how much she's changed, grown, become different, or better. This is one site that really gives you your money's worth for a fan of "girl next door" types. |
|
12-24-14 02:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Sharp Quality Videos.
Large Updates.
Exclusive Material.
Recent Addition of Boy/Girl Hardcore.
Lots of model info. |
| Cons: |
Download speeds average at best. (Compared to sites such as Videobox and Nubiles). I do not use download managers.
Although it appears to be improving; search functions still need work.
Site design seems to never change (I've been a member off and on for several years.)however; site content is changing for the better with the addition of lesbian and boy/girl hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a really good site where you will find young, beautiful girls photographed and filmed in a most excellent manner.
The factors that keep it from be a GREAT site and getting a rating of 90 or greater are download speeds and search functions.
On a short term basis the site is worth the money. If download speeds were improved, streaming and slide show functions added I would definitely consider a long term membership. |
|
02-02-10 05:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
%100 Exclusive Material
I love how their photos are shot! Very natural looking.
Unique content that brings out the models personality |
| Cons: |
MORE updates please!
Didn't really like their old school layout.
Download speed was ok. |
| Bottom Line: |
Is it worth my money? Hell YEA! Love the videos especially. Their models are always fresh and doing something different in every updates. The only bad part about this site is that they don't update enough! I believe its once every 5 days. But even with the less updates the site is stacked with years of updates and videos to entertain you for a while. |
|
01-31-10 03:27am
Replies (1)
|
Review
42
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Interaction with the Models
- Models are young and very fresh looking
- Public Nudity is very good in this sight. I usually don't care for it much. This feels real and the anticipation/trepidation of getting caught is evident, nervous laughter, etc.
- Ultra HD video is great! Runs well on my machine and looks fantastic.
- Huge Library - |
| Cons: |
- No Search Function
- Should have super sized photos for every set
- No Hardcore Boy/Girl Action |
| Bottom Line: |
This site provides what they promise! That is unusual in this industry. The videos have gotten tons better over the years. I was first a member in 2002 and still have the photosets and vids. It makes me laugh at what I though quality was.
I will be making my way to the older sets, I'm interested in seeing if FTV has updated any of the older content, now that the rendering process is much more advanced. The speed of data transfer alone allows so much more terms of quality.
I would rate this a quality site... off the charts if they added Hardcore. |
|
08-22-08 08:20am
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Lots of content
+ Great looking girls
+ Nice reality - they look like they are having fun
+ Good video quality (especially later videos)
+ Nice website design in members area
+ 248+ GB of movies (as of June 2007) |
| Cons: |
- After a while can get a little repetitive
- Very little girl/girl |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I like this site although I think it is a little repetitive. As of June 2007 they had over 5000 movies. Each model has lots of individual movies, which I would prefer to be available in one download.
I've been a member of this site twice (once in May/June) the previous time was 20 months earlier.
The site is different to a lot of others out there which is definitely a plus point. The interviews and scenes are very believable.
If they offered full HD movies and had more girl/girl scenes this would make it a really great site. |
|
11-15-07 12:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
FTV Girls
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Unique public nudity still goes on which is what I love
- Natural and fun scenes with intimate interviews to find out more of the model
- Wide choice of models to suit all tastes
- Good makeup and attire |
| Cons: |
- Slow downloads I found this time around with 90% of the ones I downloaded
- Less girls I fancied this time around
- Navigation maybe still a bit dated
- Can be a chore finding out what is worthy of a download
- Quite Pricey |
| Bottom Line: |
Sadly for me the spark didn’t seem to be there for the site this time around, it had been since September 2015 since I was last a member so was looking forward to joining again. Have to say first though I wanted to be joining the FTVX site really, which is the new site from these guys involving the girls from FTVgirls having sex with Rob the owner (lucky git I know). Rob now says this site should, no promises but has said it should be September this year as he wanted to not just release a site without much for people to see, so hopes to have lots of scenes from the get go. Anyway so as this site never opened at the end of last year and I had hoped it might be the beginning of 2017 which sadly it never happened I decided to join FTVgirls again and see what new cuties I liked this time around.
Yeah the videos are still all broken up into segments here which most modern sites don’t do, I think it’s good and bad thing if that makes sense, the reason behind it is each girl will do certain scenes there will be of course the masturbation, or she might be doing a nude dance, or some public nudity in a shopping mall, you get the picture it’s kind of random things so wouldn’t really make sense on one video file and like me you can pick the scenes that interest you, I for one don’t bother with the masturbation, never have been into it really unless she is really my type of girl or she is using a big dildo which luckily is something FTV do lots. But I join here for the lesbian and public nudity, if it was just the masturbation I would never join.
So yeah that’s the good side of the videos being split the bad side is, it can be slightly hard work going through videos to see if it’s your bag, there is lots of non nudity stuff you might have to trawl through and you got make the decision if you want this 1GB of mainly non nude stuff apart from a quick flash of the models tits near the end, you see what I mean sometimes that can be a mind chore deciding. Also you might see some awesome public nudity stuff from a girl and you want that to carry on as this is perfect and a huge turn on then you see she has two more vids left and you hope they carry this on only to find they don’t and she’s moved on to doing something you’re not into and the mood’s gone.
The lesbian content I ended up getting were Alex Grey and Nina North, Lana Rhodes and Stella Cox, Leah Gotti (Fiona) and Brook. Out of these I think I enjoyed the Leah Gotti and Brook as they seemed to really dig each other and it came across good on camera. It always makes for a better scene if the two models look like they want each other badly and not just for a pay cheque. FTV girls has good form for picking girls that work well together and often are good friends already.
Stand Out girls this time around were as follows, these were the girls that made me go wow.
Scarlett – Now this is the type of girl that makes joining the site worthwhile, amazing fun and innocent mix with bags of awesome personality that I find attractive as well as being drop dead gorgeous.
Cadie – Again amazing girl, she opened up really well and I loved her wackiness and honesty, its what I want really from FTV, girls that are super cute and have good senses of humor, Cadey shines above most girls on the site.
Mackenzie was awesome and really the kind of girl I like here, she has an innocent look but really knows how to let go and get all into being the exhibitionist
Then also worth a mention were Lanah, Blaire, Kelly and Elena. All of these updates I’ll be keeping.
Little less impressed with scenes than I have been in the past have to say, but still a great site and lots to keep you busy with an update a week, it’s one of those sites I keep an eye on to see what updates have been added.
Final Conclusion Below |
|
05-23-17 05:03am
Replies (10)
|
Rating
45
|
FTV Girls
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
02-20-08 04:21am
|
Review
46
|
FTV Girls
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good variation in severity of how hardcore each set is with appropriate labelling so you can select what interests you.
The videos are very good with an excellent back catalogue material to go through.
The girls are certainly good looking and seem at ease in the sessions I've seen
A good selection of video formats and the sets are split into sizes which are easy to download rather than just one mega file. |
| Cons: |
There is too much concentration on insertion with weird objects for my taste but each to their own
The photography stills are sorely neglected. These are at a much lower resolution than would normally be expected.
Although 'superpics are Available' these are in SuperZipFiles which are too large. You have to download these first THEN decide whether you want to view these.
There is no easy way to search the content by subject |
| Bottom Line: |
Worth a try and good value for money in terms of the back catalogue however perhaps a lack of variation and the concentration on video over photography (hey FTV .. just got that doh !) is a bit of a shame. In my opinion they could have a first class site if they brought the photograhy up to scratch, varied the content a bit more and improved the search facilities and photograph resolution |
|
01-26-07 10:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
FTV Girls
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Long overdue re-review of one of the internet's best known porn sites. Originally rated a 91.
- The newest videos are 1440x1080 with hefty 8000 bitrates, also available in a much smaller 352x240 resolution and a middle ground 720x480 resolution version.
- Pictures have been upgraded to 1600 long end, older pictures range from 1052 to 1280 long end. All are downloadable in zips.
- Site runs very fast for me. I consistently get 20% higher speed on downloads than my average download speed.
- As much exclusive content as just about any site I can name off the top of my head.
- Sets are usually more fun than other sites, a little more daring with some public sets, lots of pre-masturbation flashing as well.
- One of the first sites to have a lot of "squirting" content.
- One of the best sites for finding older content of current hardcore stars. Eva Angelina, Sativa Rose, Jenaveve Jolie, Amy Reid to name a select few have some early career solo sets here. |
| Cons: |
- Videos are still split into parts with no full scene download option. I'm not really for sure what the reasoning is behind this practice, but it gets them a few points reduction.
- This is a personal preference one. I know a lot of members wanted newer, fresher models near the amateur level and they have delivered that. That's not something I like though. I prefer the glammed up models.
- Some of the content can become tedious. Like watching a model trying to flash her boobs for 4 minutes. Some of the older sets feature some of porn's wilder girls who just do it.
- A small con to end the cons, I would like to see more pictures from the sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
I seem to be in a porn lull right now. I decided to try FTV out again after nearly 2 years away from it.
The first thing that I'm going to talk about is that the older content is better than the newer content. I think that was because of the models. Eva Angelina's sets here are some of her best on the internet. Also, I stand by my previous statement that the first set with Amy Reid is Amy's best set of her career.
Of the models that have been added since I was last a member (December 2007), I downloaded and plan to keep the content of 12 of them. They update roughly 4 times a month, so at best, I downloaded and will keep 12 out of 90 models. Even at that, most of the 12 are known porn stars.
Most of the other models are girls that look like girls I went to school with or could be the pizza delivery girl. That's great for some members, but I'm not really into the amateur, girl next door look. Though I do really like Tessa, one of the newer models, who I don't think is a porn star.
One really good part for me is that I lost my FTV files from 2007 when one of my hard drives fried. I was able to go back and get those really great pre-2008 sets.
Overall, the site is still one of the best overall sites. It just isn't that great for me. I kind of feel like I just re-joined to get the content I already had.
If it was my first time joining it, I would probably score it in the low 90s.
The split video parts are annoying. It definitely isn't because of size restrictions or concerns. The parts are rarely over 8 minutes each. This is compounded by having a splash screen on nearly all videos. So even if you line the parts up in a media player, there is still the hesitation between loading the parts plus a 2 second splash screen.
I tried joining the files into one big file, but there is still a splash screen every 8 minutes. I could edit the video and cut the splash screen out, but that's more work than I should have to do for a premium site.
The complaint with wanting more pictures should be taken as a compliment. I've always liked their photo sets especially the more public ones and would like to see 250-300 photos from each set.
You really can't knock the site on technical quality. The 1440x1080 videos are very crisp. I do wish more sites would optimize the bitrates to fit the resolution size. I would imagine a 1440x1080 video could run smoothly with a 4000-5000 bitrate, but that's nitpicking.
Most of the interviews are fun enough. It goes back to the model in each one. Eva Angelina is very funny in hers.
The site could easily score 95+ with a few changes. It's hard to say a site has a potential when it has been around as long as FTV has, but it is the best word I can think of in this situation. For those into newer, more unknown models check it out. Some of these newer models they have are really cute and come across as very genuine. Still recommended, especially for those who have never joined it. |
|
12-03-09 12:52am
Replies (7)
|
Review
48
|
FTV Girls
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Great fun girl they work with who are up for a laugh
Now HD vids so thats always a plus.
Huge archive of babes now as been going a good few years.
Lots of sexy insertions and pussies being stretched to their max, which is different
Nice public nude stuff which I really enjoyed and worth the price alone to see the girls kissing and feeling each other up outside in public areas
87 but thats mainly cause of the great lesbian stuff even though it is too and far between here which is a great shame, I'll probs join every two years just to get the new lesbian stuff |
| Cons: |
Too much solo stuff for my liking
Some vids are of photoshoots which is totally dull
Hardcore doesn't happen here
Needs more lesbian
Quality of the vids isn't the best
Files named the same which is very annoying indeed |
| Bottom Line: |
Its a great site and quite unique in lots of ways, I enjoy things a little out of the norm porn bracket and this site had great insertions, excellent lesbian material with some vids making my favs of all time. Milk play on one vid which was weird but interesting.
I adore public nudity and girls flashing their pussies in naughty no underwear scenes, great indeed, love the kissing scenes in public too. nice touch.
Lots of the scenes are fresh of the top of the models head and you never know were its going, some are disapointing in the end, others are like wow, the naughty babe.
All is downloadable and yeah some of the older stuff not the best of quality, I think it would be good to re edit them like sapphic erotica did but that could take forever as u can guess, still the the quality is improved which is the main thing.
All the solo stuff for me is kind of boring, really wished they would do more lesbian scenes as they do it so well and could be one of the leaders if they got more of the girls to pair up, theres loasds of models who have done lesbian stuff on other sites so its not like they aren't willing.
For the lesbian and some of the fetish stuff off the wall scenes I really liked but its mainly solo stuff, if thats your thing you'll be in your element, some stunning girls. Solo masturbation though bores me and always has.
Overall its got stuff to warrant a membership here for most porn seekers apart from the hardcore crew, none of that here.
I'm giving 87 |
|
01-20-08 01:51am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
49
|
FTV Girls
(0)
86.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 09:51pm
|
Review
50
|
FTV Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful girls-lots of choice
Multiple sets of several girls
Hi quality videos
Hi res photos |
| Cons: |
Price is high for content
Some lesbo sex but no boy-girl, not enough niches covered |
| Bottom Line: |
I waited a long time, reading reviews and looking at samples before joining this site. Then I bit the bullet and said I'll take it on for a month. It is significantly overpriced for the content I have come to expect from my porn sites. (How about some sex?)
I like the premise of breaking out the girls, showing them in a personal light, choosing what to wear and then the interviews before they get down to stripping and sometimes, inserting fingers or toys.
But, it stops there. I'd love to see a guy come in and slip the salame or insert the gherkin once in a while. Some of those beautiful faces would look great with some jizz splattered over them. C'mon guys, these are First Time Video girls, so let's give them an initiation!
Anyway, I didn't stay for more than a month for that reason. I did enjoy the girls. |
|
08-24-07 07:47am
Replies (0)
|
|
