Review
1
|
Naughty Midwest Girls XXX
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Rare site in an underserved niche (US-based old/young)
- Has some beautiful models
- 140+ scenes
- Mostly boy/girl but does have some girl/girl
- Offers both photos and videos
- Reasonable price for the site
- Updates |
| Cons: |
- Production values are relatively low
- Wide discrepancy in the cameras used
- Updates on a bi-weekly schedule |
| Bottom Line: |
I found this to be a tough review to write because while I really like the porn that this site has to offer the site itself and the production values leave a lot to be desired. This really is a case of overlooking some flaws to get access to a niche I really like, but I’m sure we’ve all done that before.
I don’t know how I missed this site for all of these years but I’m glad I stumbled on it. Given the title I presumed it was one of the many sites that feature solo masturbation scenes or things like wet T-shirt contests. Nothing in the title indicated to me that the site offered old/young porn.
I’m sure if you are a regular porn subscriber you have also run across numerous sites like this that have an amateur feel to them. Everything about it seems amateur from the production values to the website layout. Sites like these lack the polish of the large studio-based sites. That isn’t a bad thing. My experience is that when I find an under-served niche that I like run by an amateur the sites often have some of the hottest material because the people making it share the interest as well. That seems to be the case here too.
The site does have a lot going for it in that it offers porn in the rare niche of US-based old/young porn. Most of the models here seem to be relatively unknown and most are very attractive. The male talent in most of the scenes seems to be the guy who owns the site and he is a pudgy guy who has to be in his late 50s or early 60s. Call me twisted, but something about that scenario adds a lot of heat to a scene for me.
While there is a mixture of kinds of scenes on the site most of them are boy/girl hard-core. There are some solo scenes. There are also several girl/girl scenes but most of those turn into boy/girl/girl after some lesbian action.
Many sites featuring old/young porn seem to go in for the stepdaughter theme and I realize that creeps some people out. That theme is used here but the more common theme is that of a babysitter.
Most of the scenes are shot using a combination of POV and tripod-mounted cameras. This method is never going to give the best scenes but they can work. A significant problem that this site suffers from is that one of the cameras used (usually for POV stuff) is very low resolution. It is low enough that it detracts from the overall scene.
There are currently over 140 scenes on the site. The site is updating and it shouldn’t be a surprise that the updates only happen approximately once every two weeks.
The videos are available in WMV and MP4 formats but each of those only comes in one resolution and those aren't great. The WMVs are 720x480, 1600 kb/s and 30fps. The MP4s are a bit better at 1280x720, 4000 kb/s and 30fps. One minor flaw is that the MP4 files are listed as being for the iPad so I wrongly assumed that they’d be lower resolution than the WMV files. But the thing is that SOME of them are lower resolution and some aren't. I can accept that older files are lower resolution but it would be useful to list the resolution on the file so the viewer could choose not only between the file type but the resolution as well.
Photos are available as singles or zips. Those aren't high-resolution either at 1280x960.
Initially I wasn’t able to use my download manager but I think now that may have been an isolated issue or a problem with my software because the site now allows me to use one.
This won’t be an issue for many readers, but I was a bit disappointed to not find many anal scenes at all. There are three or four and these aren't the best filmed scenes on the site.
The price for a monthly membership is pretty good and goes a long way to making up for some of the site’s shortcomings. There isn't a TBP discount but the regular monthly price is just over $20.
The bottom line for me is that this site is both easy to recommend and easy to reject – and that all depends on whether you like this niche. The site has some serious flaws: the production values aren't great and the site has an overall amateur feel to it. It lacks the quality of a bigger, better funded site. But if you like this niche those flaws can either be overlooked or they can add to the allure of the scene. So if you like this niche the site gets a strong recommendation and if you don’t like this niche you should probably spend your porn budget elsewhere. |
|
09-12-16 03:25pm
Replies (2)
|
