| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
ALS Scan
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Photos come in low (1600X1000) and high (3504X2336) resolution size.
- ZIP files for both low and high resolution photos.
- Stunning HD videos in 1280X720 resolution.
- Multiple video resolutions for quicker downloads if you prefer
- Videos are shot in a way the models personality really comes through (see con for flip side.
- Updated every single day
- Model Bios
- Model Index
- All the girls are clean shaved with no red bumps which is nice. smooth.
- Amazing girl/girl action.
- Excellent customer support/feedback |
| Cons: |
- Design is from 1997
- Navigation could be improved
- No rating system for sets/models
- Some of the updates are older content redone in bigger sizes to meet todays standards.
- The video is shot while the photographer is shooting photos so there is the click/flash as well as constant direction for the girl.
- No Boy/Girl hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you love your ladies to be shaved completly, then there is no other site to be a member of. I am not sure how they get every girls pussy so incredible smooth and bump free but I certainly do appreciate it.
The HD video quality is stunning and as long as you don't mind hearing the click of a camera and the direction of the photographer then you will be more than happy with the video section of ALS Scan. As I pointed out in the pros in this style you actually get to see a lot of the models personality which comes off as more natural in a way.
The photo content is very good especially the material shot in 2007 and 2008 as the high resolution photo sizes makes it jump off the screen. So close you can taste the pussy juice almost.
If you like girls masturbating and girl/girl action and don't mind not having boy/girl hardcore action, then you absolutely can not go wrong with a membership to ALS Scan. Getting $5 off the membership price from PaysiteDiscounts.com especially made this site a very good value and definitely will be in my constant rotation going forward.
They also have a brand new model Franziska who is absolutely to die for. Tall, petite, tight and braces with a pussy so tender you'd never want to leave it. |
|
06-26-08 06:16pm
Replies (6)
|
Comment
77
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
06-18-08 07:33pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
78
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
HUGE Resolution pictures (my screen is not big enough to fully appreciate this)
Exclusive content and exclusive girls
The girls are cute and shaved |
| Cons: |
Expensive.
Navigation: other reviewers have stated that it has gotten better but it's worse than any other site that I have used. Limited search options.
Site Design: Amateur design, like a personal homepage from end of the ninetees. Strange choice of colours and fonts
ZIPS: the older zips that I wanted to download where strangelly organized, when unzipping they were put into 2-5 different folders.
Content: I simply don't like the content, all sets are similar; most include: Fisting, large toy insertions, Insertions of everyday objects like hotdogs, bananas, etc into pussies, Speculum use, Pussy gaping. The girls seem to laugh and enjoy themselves in a very NON erotic way. None of the girls seem horny: to me it is NOT exciting seeing a 18 old girl putting 3 hot dogs in her pussy while laughing like a kid.
But if you like the above, sure then my cons are yours pros and you'll love ALS. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am sorry if you fans get angry for not giving it a better score but I am sure most "normal" pornsuers would agree with me: This site is not just any teen site, it is pretty out there with lotsa fisting and putting instruments and food in a fetish kind of way into small girls pussies. Rather off-putting and not my kind of tea at all. For 9 out of 10 pornusers this site is crap, for the rest who likes all the things I listed in theCONS I am sure it is great and worth the 95 something rating that fooled me into signing up. |
|
06-09-08 10:45am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
79
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
06-02-08 10:52am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
80
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
06-01-08 10:40am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
81
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
05-21-08 10:27am
Replies (1)
|
Review
82
|
ALS Scan
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- ALS Scan has been a longtime favorite of mine, great quality content
- Newest pictures are over 3000 on high end
- Videos are 720 high end, plus they have some HD videos that are mixed in at 1280 high end
- Zipped pictures that are now coming in full zip downloads, most of the older sets require 4-5 zips for a full collection
- Site runs very fast for me and download speeds are well above average for me
- Very original content, even the photoshoot videos are worth downloading, as many add another girl to help out and in end up carrying a new kind of eroticism |
| Cons: |
- Only nitpicks here, the older picture sets that have to be downloaded in sections
- The member voting for older sets to be updated to bigger resolution, never goes the way I want! I want Mia Stone in huge resolution!
- Wished they offered combo memberships with their other great site ALS Angels! |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the few sites that I regularly let rebill for more than one month. I also am a big fan of their other site, ALS Angels and would like to see them come up with a combo deal to join both for a slightly lower price than the two would cost if joined separately.
Something I forgot to mention in the pros are the ALS DVDs that they let you download each month, while not as high of quality as the actual DVD itself, it is a nice bonus to let you see what goes into those. Most are either of one very popular model or occasionally two popular models. That is just icing on the cake.
The pictures are some of my favorites on the internet. Those newest sets are getting huge resolutions, I know I downloaded the newest Meggan Mallone full zip set and it was upwards of 400 MB in size, with the pics being 3300 on high end. Thanks goodness for large hard drives, eh?
The videos are really good quality, I would even say great quality, even on the lower than HD level ones, those are still 720 high end and are very crisp and clear. The HD ones are near perfection!
One of my favorite parts of this site and ALS Angels, the girls seem to be having fun with the photographers, especially in the photoshoots that they have videos of. The interaction to me is very important, happy, laughing models make for better pictures.
ALS Scan is one of the few sites that I could make my porn craving happy with. I always come back to it and somehow, had forgotten to review it. Highly recommended! |
|
05-05-08 10:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
83
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
04-26-08 06:56am
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
ALS SCAN. I'm sure ALS is the real reason the internet took off back in 1998. DOWNLOAD SPEED - fast. GIRLS - awesome. QUANTITY - too much, like a kid in a candy store. Brilliant. I've never seen some many happy vegetables. If I was reincarnated, I would like come back as a cucumber on an ALS photoshoot. |
| Cons: |
Why do they assume that we want to start the pleasure of our viewing with the girls already naked, already sitting down/lying down, dildo already lubed up. Where's the foreplay, these girls should be wrapped up in sexy outfits like the best presents under my Xmas tree. I'd like to see them walking around in those ridiculous heels that Porns Stars must wear (Ding Dong), with skimpy clothes on, desperate to do their dirty/sexy strips, but we never have any of that. Is there no appreciation for the good old stage by stage - get you exited yadda yadda yadda approach. Sometimes you do feel like you've walked into a Gynecologists surgery. Exact repeating theme does get monotonous |
| Bottom Line: |
The models are amazing. I know I've made some criticisms above,, which makes me sound like a spoilt child, but hey, why go and get some of the most beautiful models (and there are a lot on the site) and not take full advantage of them. And on that note. It would be nice to see a bit of hardcore on this site. A lot of these girls do hardcore, and with ALS HD quality DVD you'd be blown away.
My bottom line is, awesome girls, theme a bit too repetitive but you can't get bored with something until you've over indulged, and for every dollar I spent on my alsscans subscription was VERY well spent.
This is a site I know I will join again and again in the years to come. |
|
04-04-08 02:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
85
|
ALS Scan
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Tons of exclusive solo girl content, almost all archived
+ Lots of hot, amateur ladies...all shaved (lives up to the name)
+ Models do a lot: big insertions, fisting, speculum, many do peeing, some anal
+ Girl-girl action
+ Daily video update, photo update every other day
+ Quick downloads
+ Newer videos are HD, 2 res available for newer photos
+ All natural models, few porn stars |
| Cons: |
They are minor, but...
- Many videos are just photoshoots or BTS (can get boring), newer masturbation vids feel very forced and often fake
- Site's being redesigned, but still needs a few tweaks
- Many older models have no vids, few photos
- A few too many European models |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into young, totally shaven girls who are willing to get nasty in front of a camera, then ALS Scan could easily become your new friend. This site shoots some very hot girls, many who have never done any porn or modeling prior, and a few who haven't done any since (that's exclusive!). The focus here is not just quantity, but quality, and new pics are offered in two sizes (around 1300x1000 and 3000x2000), usually with good lightning and crystal clear resolution. New videos are also in big, clear HD (1280x720). The owner/photographer doesn't mess around, and models are quickly undressed and lubed up in the scenes, with lots of toys, fisting, speculum, along with some models who pee, or do some anal; but only what they are comfortable doing, and it pays off in the photos.
My only gripes would be that the videos can get boring, and the newer ones feel too forced if they are masturbation. Yeah, it’s porn, but their older vids would just introduce the model and let her go from there. The owner also frequently talks, even in the masturbation vids, and his voice can be quite annoying, and downright creepy (a frequent complaint by other users). They are also finally putting their old design out to pasture, but the new one isn't perfect (no searching, you can still end up doing a lot of clicking). But the content more than makes up for these things, and as older material is being rereleased and updated, you'll probably end up quite satisfied. |
|
04-01-08 08:37pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
86
|
ALS Scan
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Hi res photos
Very hot models
Great video quality
Good Download speed
ZIPs for photos
Large amount of content, 230 GB
No DRM or download limits
Exclusive
Update section
Most videos named appropriately
Daily updates! |
| Cons: |
Price is a bit high $30
Very bad site design
Navigation absolutely horrible!
Only 15 or 30 photos per zip in many sets
No large boobed models
A few videos extremely large, but very low quality |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site has great content, but they do a very poor job at presenting it. The site design is very inconsistent and a headache to get around. The photo sets have a lot of zips because many only have 15 photos per zip. If you want a copy of each photo you need to grab 1667 zip files! Some have many zips per set, others have several sets per zip, they cant make up their minds on this!
The videos look nice. They offer divx, wmv and mpeg4. The videos are mostly in 640x480 or 720x520 your choice. The videos average 15-20 minutes long, and average 350 MB in size. There are 489 videos totaling for 192 GB!
There are about 38 GB worth of photos here if you download the zips and always take the high res. The photo quality differs a bit. Some are about average sized and other are huge at 2336x3504!
There are currently about 200 models and they all look great. They are all small girls, so no big boobs here, unfortunately for me! There is a good bit of fisting a other forms of pussy stretching here, It is a bit like Saphic Erotic in this sense.
Other than the ridicules site navigation the site would be great. The poor navigation cost the site 10 points because it really was a headache to get around. During downloading I frequently had to stop for a while, or look at some of the photos before downloading to remind myself why I has messing with this site. I really wish they would fix this because the content is wonderful! |
|
03-30-08 03:26pm
Replies (6)
|
Comment
87
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
03-25-08 12:15pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
88
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
03-21-08 10:44am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
89
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
03-18-08 10:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
ALS Scan
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The best quality hardcore solo porn site in the web.
- Photo updates past 2 years come in 2 resolutions of 1400x1000 and high 3500x2000 pixels. Excellent photography.
- Excellent video quality most recent updates HD quality. Owner takes pains to improve the quality of the older videos some taken as back as late '90s.
- Tons of material up.
- All shaved but otherwise natural models. All natural breasts and bodies.
- Updates 7 days a week. Photo and video updates on weekdays. One video update each on the weekends.
- Very Attractive Models.
- Includes glamour shots advancing to hardcore solo poses and all sorts of penetrations which include toys, cucumbers, bananas, small bottles, tongs, fisting, speculum, their special 'als rocket' and peeing.
- Behind the scenes uncut video of the photo shoot which shows models true personality. |
| Cons: |
Very few cons.
- Many masturbation videos have a fake, forced feeling to it. Not as natural and laid back as their behind the scenes videos. (Might appeal to some)
- Some of the behind the scenes videos they focus on too much close up of the vagina instead of the whole body and face. The model and the photographer will be busy talking but you get to see only the vagina for maybe 2-3 minutes. (Might appeal to some)
- Older photo update before 2001 not of the best quality.
- Daily photo updates have only part of the photoset but the director of the website states that this is going to change to complete updates soon instead of breaking each scene into parts. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has been there since 1997 and I have been a member since 2003. I have experimented with lots of other porn sites and very few compare to the quality and solo hardcore nature of this website.
Director who calls himself Alex takes pains to keep the quality. He gives us details of models and happenings in his interesting blog. He responds to most of our e-mails and suggestions personally and promptly despite him being the busy boss. |
|
03-07-08 08:59pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
91
|
ALS Scan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Attractive models.
Updates every day, with a new video everyday.
Great video quality.
No more video rotation.
Lots of content, especially pictures.
Lots of fisting and extreme object insertion.
Very responsive webmaster and cameraman to e-mails.
Good bonus deals from time to time.
Director's blog is very informative. |
| Cons: |
At least 3 of the videos released per week are old material "remastered". Perhaps this is good for new members, but for those who have been visiting this site for years, they can get repetitive if you have seen them already.
New models are only added about every 2 weeks.
The release of content is very random and chaotic, and even though a model may be "released" it usually only starts with 1 pic set and video. It may take upwards of 6 months to a year after to see all her content.
Some models still don't have all their content released who were introduced a LONG time ago.
Amount of extreme shoots like fisting is decreasing significantly over the last 4-5 months.
If you don't like thin models you may not like this site.
Anal fans may be somewhat disappointed, as it's more focused on pussy play.
Plain site design. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a quality site and used to be one of my favorites. Unfortunately, I can no longer classify it as such. It is still a decent site, but things need to be improved. I'm actually editing this review and this is after the most recent comment I put down on PU. Some things to mention and of importance:
1. As I wrote in my comment, the amount of girls that do extreme is much less than is used to be. Of the last 6 "new models" (which equals 3 months of time since they come biweekly) there is only 1 that has a fisting set. Very disappointing, since they almost always used to do that. I remember Alex talking about how he used to never shoot a girl if she wasn't willing to do all the extreme stuff, and that he was thinking of not being so harsh in the future. Well, he must not be being as harsh now in his standards for shoots, and it shows, unfortunately. Considering that most of the models only did 1 scene out of 4 or 5 that entailed something like fisting, saying that people complained that there was too much extreme just doesn't fly.
2. While it used to not bother me as much, the release of material I now see to be a big problem. Once a new model is added to the site, she only starts with 1 picture set and a video. After that, it is completely up to polls, member requests, etc. that determine when other sets are released. Keep in mind that most models usually have 5 photo sets and 5 videos at least, so seeing all of that can take LITERALLY up to a year or more. That is ridiculous and needs to change. I can't think of another site that has such a terrible system for releasing model content. So even though a new model appears every 2 weeks, it's not a real release of a new model like on most sites. It's just the beginning of a very long process of seeing that model in the scenes she has done. I don't believe the people who run the site even know exactly what's going on and have it all straight, since there have been a few times I have e-mailed them requesting something from a model from years back and get a response about how they forgot about it or didn't even remember the scene existed. I wonder how much stuff hasn't seen the light of day and never will. Big problem here, and very frustrating.
3. If you have never been a member to the site there is plenty to see and look through. There are a ton of models and content goes back years. Almost all of the models are attractive and have nice bodies, I will say that. But, if you like thicker girls you should look elsewhere. Their sister site Alsangels has more of a focus on boobs and meat, but the updates on that site are so low it's only really worth joining if you never have before.
This is a site that is still good, but needs to make some changes to keep pace with the truly great sites out there. There needs to be a refocus on shooting girls that are willing to do the extreme stuff, and the release of model content needs a complete overhaul. |
|
03-03-08 09:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
92
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
03-03-08 05:55pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
93
|
ALS Scan
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Read other reviews for techical data they all explain it very detailed and correctly.
Pros:
- XXX hardcore solo and girl/girl action
- Tons of High Quality Videos and Zip Files
- Its improving with new releases. The staff must be listening to reviews? See, we matter.
- Updates daily. The mix is good.
- ALL LADIES SHAVED...teen based, and there hot!
- Lots of oil and lube if you like it wet...xxx |
| Cons: |
Navigation needs help. It works but you have to do a lot of 'mouse work' to find files. Cosolidate the downloading of pics. NV works and you'll be able to download what you want but you'll have to do some work to get it. Another negative, not all of a models material may be avaliable for viewing. They want you to email requests for them to post additional videos or pics of a certain model. I never did so I can't comment on that. But my real Con is with the missed XXX. Gyno is the best to describe the solo and girl/girl pics and videos. Upclose and pink. If thats your fetish join. You'll not be disappointed. I understand models are paid on sex acts performed. But the site got very one themed. The site offers little in pussy licking, no rimming or mishing (pussy to pussy). No anal play at all (ok,very little), not enough dildoe or dong fucking. Where's the Strap-ON! In short, the photographors had red hot cunts ready for solo and lezzie xxx...and no??? Guys expand your horizon's a bit |
| Bottom Line: |
I highly recommend if you like the other sites I reviewed. Teen based and HG XXX solo and g/g porno. ALS is 60 day site to explore and worth it just on the amount of material and the level of erotica. If they listen to reviews and make changes this could be a site worth joining over and over. The models are right in front of them and I've seen the models on their site perform on other XXX Hardcore solo and lezzie sites without any reservations. Why not bring that other erotica to ALS.? Variety is key and I miss that on so many sites becasue they get so focused on one theme, but it plays itself out over time. I should list all the sex acts I would make sure I capture on cam for a solo or girl/girl site...Even with all my con's I still stand beside by 87 rating. |
|
02-20-08 05:20pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
94
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
02-09-08 08:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
95
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
01-19-08 01:59am
Replies (4)
|
Rating
96
|
ALS Scan
(0)
98.0
|
No Review.
|
01-12-08 04:26pm
|
Review
97
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Nice European and American solo and lesbian girls
-The sex is good and hard
-No men (except for the director, whose voice features in most movies)
-Variety of set locations, inside and outside
-Range of movie sizes, up to HD for many
-Movies are reasonably filmed and edited
-No music soundtrack (always a good thing)
-Zipped picture sets |
| Cons: |
-A lot of fisting. If fisting isn't your favourite thing, this site may become boring fast
-Lots of movie downloads are just filmings of photo shoots - and anyone that has seen a photo shoot will know that the reality can be boring and show the falseness of the situation
-Many of the movies are just 'behind the scenes' features
-Some movies are not even porn - they are just naked girls in public locations acting goofy
-Entire photo sets are spread over several updates
-Male director talks during movies (that has lost 20 points alone). He also sounds gay, and I believe he is called Alex. (Yes, indeed.)
-Design/Navigation is terrible
-Proper porn movie content is not as huge as other similarly priced sites |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like lots of fisting in your solo or lesbian porn (and I'm sure many guys out there do), and like hearing a male voice giving instruction and encouragement to the girls, then I would recommend this site to you.
As well as the fisting content, there are a couple of nice tribbing scenes too, and most of the girls generally seem very convincing and genuinely enjoying the sex - although there are clearly some 'actors' here not genuinely getting off. There's some anal too - but not in most scenes. And there is some peeing that tries to pretend it is 'squirting' (does anyone really believe that?) as well as some honest peeing, and a few apparently genuine orgasms where white girl goo is seen oozing from the open pussy (although after a fisting session you can't be sure it's not just lube).
There are better looking sites out there, offering more variety with better navigation and bigger content - but if you are looking around for something new, and can cope with the negative points mentioned, it might just be worth a look.
Highly recommended to guys that enjoy hearing a male voice (and especially a gay-sounding one) talking while they wank. The score leaps to 85 for those people. |
|
01-12-08 06:07am
Replies (14)
|
Review
98
|
ALS Scan
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Great Video scenes but he talks way to much. and he has anoying voice
+ Real HD videos (for new content)
+ Content Isnt deleted anymore
+ Lots of Girl Juices/Cum
+ Exclusive Content
+/- 500k Average speed
+ Download manger accepted
+ No DL limits
+ Scene desciption
+/- Many Girls have a strange red colour in the pussy
+ Best site ive scene for Images
+ Regular Update |
| Cons: |
- No Niches at all!
- Bare Basic navigation (not the worst ive scene but very basic
- Tons of old content deleted(This alone lost them 10 points!)
- Selecting a model only gives you Images not video
- Download speed jumps up and down all the time (from 50k to 600k) |
| Bottom Line: |
All in all this site could be outstanding but with such bad navigation and such a basic layout it may take you days to find what your looking for.
This site could be a contender for some of those top sites and the work involved to make it outstanding is so minior it give me a feeling like they dont even care.
They have all the great old content they just dont put it on the site. I mean my god they have Great HD videos but not even a decent video Niche search.
They have a weird colour scheme aswell its like a disney site or something.
Would i recommend this site? if you love pictures Yes its perfect for you, if you like videos theres just no point joining. |
|
12-31-07 07:33am
Replies (2)
|
Review
99
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ highest picture (resolutions up to >2200 times >3500 pixels!) and video quality (full-hd) for the newest content.
+ lots of different fetishs are served like multiple insertions (dildos ,vibrators, panties, candles, veggies etc.), fisting, peeing, role-play etc.
+ the sets and vids also include behind the scenes footage.
+ lots different of models and tons of content.
+ all my mails have been answered even if it took some time |
| Cons: |
- not enough picture updates to satisfy me fully but lots of crazy video footage.
- navigation / UI is somewhat plain and could still need improvement even though they already spent some work on that but this site is old and huge.
- I miss some content of models already shot but maybe I should contact them and seem how they react. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into young models with completely shaved muffs and you like to see lots of crazy video footage then please add 10-15 points to the score I gave.
These models are mostly young at below 25 years of age but they are good looking and some do the craziest insertions and most of them the regular fisting. Some shoots happened in the Carribean, while being on adult conventions and also in eastern Europe where Alex and his team always search for young hotties willing to do shoots the ALS style.
And don't forget the fact that ALS will - from time to time - offer special bonuses for its members like complete sets of casts in Budapest (2005 & 2007) or a special about a days shooting including everthing from breakfast 'til supper time :-)
Follow-Up:
Changed my rating from 80 to 92 as Alex now releases full sets of pics plus they change their navigational features. Seems as if I'll soon have to even increase my rating.
ALS Scan is worth a join if you like young models doing lots of crazy stuff. Thumbs up for Alex and his crew! I'll stay with them for a longer period of time that's for sure :-) |
|
12-27-07 12:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
ALS Scan
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Huge amounts of full length HD Video for member download
+ Daily Updates 7 days a week
+ Highest photo and H.264 video quality on internet
+ Pictures available in 2 sizes all zip paks for download
+ Directors Blog for secrets about models with advance preview
+ Lots of behind the scene videos shows models true personality
+ Large monthly video and picture bonuses.
+ Lots of glamore pictures and lots of hardcore pictures |
| Cons: |
- No boy-girl sex
- No Vagina hair at site. Sometimes model with vagina hair is nice.
- Old site design with frames
- Some models not updated for me enough
- Old Models before 2000 low quality and partial sets
- No open multisite discount |
| Bottom Line: |
For me Alscans is best site on internet because I have been member of over 150 of sites.
Best balance of glamore and hardcore. No site have ever allow member to feel closer to model. They love work for Alsscan and must make them very happy to show best in pictures and video. Compare model shot by alsscan with other sites like Ron Harris, metart, ftv, or Suze Randal, and models always look very much better on alscan. Five years before I think site might not be so good with not enough video but now site is amazing. So much full length videos. More pictures and HD video than member can ever download. I wish for alsscan boy-girl then site is perfect 100.
They have top photographers with largest picture details and alsscans only special toys and fisting. Large mix of European girls and American girls and I think 50/50 of each. Lots of model talking during video sex scenes that I like. I hate when photographer talks but that is old videos. No photographer talks in videos for last 2-3 years. I got 1 year memberships to both alscan and alsangels for $220,00 USD but I do not think they want people to now about discount. Maybe just ask.
A Blog has great stories and pictures about shoots and models. Alscans models use lots of body oils and looks so sexy with shiny skin and smoth wet vagina.
Site design is old with frames but member surfing works and is easy. My emails to site get answered. Nice Anna emails back. Sometimes photographers emails me back to. |
|
12-15-07 06:23am
Replies (2)
|
|
