| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
In The Crack
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ CLOSEUP exclusive content! This site lives up to its name
+ Clear, well-lit photography, w/ newer vids in HD
+ Hot models (though they certainly don't focus on faces) who get creative: speculums, anal, peeing, toys, veggies...
+ Photos available to all members, and now, finally, all video as well
+ Some girl-girl |
| Cons: |
- Pretty high price
- More girl-girl needed
- Closeups this closeup may not be for everyone
- Took them way too long to drop their token video system
- Older models have smaller pics |
| Bottom Line: |
Love closeup photography? Well, this site is so far in the crack it's practically in the hole; this site takes the genre so far that any closer and these girls' cheeks and lips would be smudging the lens. Their bigger photos (1600x1200, some 2400x1800) are huge, and you can easily end up staring at a crack (or hole) bigger than your monitor, or even real life. You will probably spend a few hours just admiring the pics, or at least getting a detailed lesson on female anatomy.
It's a blessing that they finally dropped their stupid pay-per-view token video system, especially considering the price. The fact that they were doing this for so long - screwing over members who had already paid (and losing potential business) - is probably the biggest reason for not giving them a higher score. I first learned of this site after a friend showed me a video, but I was let down when I found out they were separate from the regular membership. Still, their photography can practically stand on its own, though their vids are also quite entertaining (queefing vags, winking assholes, masturbation, pissing). I personally prefer shorter clips (5-10mins) than longer, boring vids, but it does mean more DLs.
I think anybody who joins this site already likes this stuff, but there are a few who probably think this is aimed at gynecologists and dermatologists, so it doesn't have universal appeal, but few sites do. For those who do like their porn up close, then this really hits the mark (crack?). |
|
04-03-08 02:01pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
77
|
In The Crack
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
When they say In the Crack they mean it! If your into gyno, in your face closeups of ass and pussy meat you have to tour this site. These guys worship the ass in both pic's and videos. If your an ASSMAN your going to love their xxx focus on the ass and shaved cunt. Nice round and fatty ruby asses. The models are very XXX showing you everything, no holds bar extreme. Hardcore solo masturbation and exhibitionism. The girls lay it all out in the pics and the videos.
-cunt and ass worshiping; very strong focus on gyno upclose pics and video
-tons of pictures, three different series of each girl
-their style of video is unquie, I found the level of eroticism to be excellent
-the models are a bit older not teenie...great bodies
-erotic locations, outfits and posing
-they deliver what the say... Deep In the Crack |
| Cons: |
The videos are broken up into parts no option for a complete download. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like hot wet cunny, girls being totally xxx and explicit, lots of pussy finger and dildoe fucking and spreading gyno wide, lots of lube, nice amount of anal play, pissing, in your face close-ups of hot cunny... stop reading and join...I was a member previously but this is the first time where all the videos are available for downloading. Top quality porn...they got themselves a hot site. I don't fluff my ratings. To get a 90+ from me the porn site really would have to impress me. I only like solo girl or lezzie sites and I have been a memeber of all the top sites in that catagory and I never rated any of them a 90+. In the Crack is my first 90+ and the girls and site deserved it. |
|
03-13-08 11:34am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
78
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
03-09-08 12:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
79
|
In The Crack
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of rude, rude (I mean RUDE) anal girls
-Highly original site, quite unlike any other
-Technically brilliantly shot movies (seriously some of the best filming in porn I have ever seen)
-Ditto picture sets
-Movies available in range of download sizes
-Nice big archive
-Despite no official support - DMs do tend to work
-Responsive customer support |
| Cons: |
-Girls in the movies tend to lack passion
-Can get a bit repetitive and boring
-Not too clear on regularity of updates, or when new ones are due
-Some of the shots are very very close-up - when you see a pussy or asshole filling the entire screen, it can cease to be sexy, and start to look like a biology lesson
-No long all-in-one movies - but this is not a big prob - the parts are often several minutes and can be loaded into your media player's playlist for one long continual experience
-Picture sets have lots of near-identical shots, and need some serious pruning. Many could easily be a third the size, and be better for it. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine you have hired a sexy escort girl to come back to your place to give a private show, just for you. You're sitting back in your chair, and she stands right in front of you. She turns round, pulls her panties aside, and parts her ass cheeks to give a birds eye view of her tight asshole getting stretched open.
Well, that is how many of these movies start, and what a way to start! The girls often progress to striking all kinds of incredibly rude poses, generally focusing on their anuses. The camera gets in close, and doesn't miss a thing. Eventually, the girls masturbate, again with much ass play. Happily, dildos are not overused - you are as likely to see disappearing fingers as you are vibrators and toys.
There are also a few 2-girl sets inc. sensual massage + ass play.
The downside is, the action often seems contrived, moves at a very leisurely pace, and is very repetitive. The girls are clearly putting on a show for the viewer - which in itself is not a bad thing. But they never seem to lose themselves in abandoned passion. It's much more about showing off their bodies and sexual bits - rude exhibitionism, rather than images of girls masturbating and having fun getting off.
The picture sets have some amazing individual pics in them - but too often you will get about 9 pics in a row, all close-ups of an open pussy, and its like playing 'spot the difference'.
Still, top marks for originality. Ass fans should visit this fine site at least once.
UPDATE
I have lowered my score from 89 to 80, having had some time to re-evaluate the material. This is still within the 'very good' range as this is a very original site. But I find the passage of time since downloading the content has not been kind. The movies have become boring to me very quickly; I find myself fast forwarding through too many movies to get to an exiting part. There's just a lack of passion. Likewise, the photo sets have too much uninteresting filler, and too many near-identical shots that the webmaster probably couldn't bring himself to edit out.
Bottom line: this is a highly original site, but there are still hotter all-girl anal sites out there. |
|
03-06-08 03:12pm
Replies (16)
|
Comment
80
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
03-01-08 04:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
81
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
02-29-08 06:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
82
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
02-26-08 08:03am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
83
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
02-20-08 03:45pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
84
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
10-06-07 05:13am
Replies (9)
|
Review
85
|
In The Crack
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ASS is the emphasis here
+usually very fine Euro and American women; most are well-known
+117 gallery sets, most of which are of a unique model in two complete scenes
+excellent quality photography, esp from #15 to the present
+zips and individual pics available in small (approx. 800px) and large (1500 to 2400px) sizes, but see the cons!
+OK, collage-like previews of galleries (click “models” link, then click a gallery to see it)
+more recent vids in 640x360, 1280x720, and 1920x1080 |
| Cons: |
-only 3 new galleries + companion videos per month
-access to all photos costs $24.95; video downloads require purchasing tokens in a complex system based on video size and time length (e.g. a small and short one costs just several, but a large and long one can cost over 200). Purchase examples: 500 tokens for $23.95; 10,000 for $349.95. (:o)
-complete availability of large and small pics starts with gallery #43
-no standard pic sizes; a variety of custom dimensions |
| Bottom Line: |
What I like are photos shot straight above a beautiful woman lying belly down, back straight, from the upper thigh to the top of her head, looking back amorously, her delectable ass beckoning. What this site delivers is close, but either full-body length with the woman’s face buried in a mass of hair, or just the ass all by itself, nearly every single time! Somehow with this site I almost NEVER get my wish!
But, dear reader, you might get yours: ass in various positions and at many angles (just not my favorite one). Colorful toys shoved into/sticking out of the three most popular orifices. Closeups of cheeks pulled apart, shot from multiple XYZ coordinates. Ditto that for the MOST popular body cavity. This is what we call stretching.
Feminists say that porn objectifies women. This site single-mindedly endeavors to do so, and it succeeds. Our dehumanized pretties include Eve Angel, Alexis Love, Jassie, Sophie Moone, Sophie Paris, Addison Rose, Susana Spears, Mia Stone, Lucy Stratilova, and many more. And it can get very messy, such as with Layla Rivera’s toilet session. (I’ll bet she’s a vegetarian.)
The photo quality is so good and the women look so fine, with such detail that you can clearly see the texture of their skin. It’s hard for me to believe how disappointing this site is -- for me, anyway. 200-350 photos per gallery is common here. Why can’t I get my wish? I do at lots of other sites. It’s really weird.
And the videos? Fuck that.
Follow-Up:
Now you can join and get everything for $34.95. I've been downloading lots of vids of girls like Susana Spears, Karlie Montana, and Peaches (among others) and the extended ass worship is very nice! Don't need the closeup anus twiching, but some folks might enjoy it. Boosted the score from 70 to 83. |
|
08-25-07 08:25pm
Replies (9)
|
|
