Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Jamesy:
(FTV Staff's Reply)
I know this is quite a while on from the original comment and things may have changed in that time but a download speed of over 2 MB/s per file is fine for me - a lot faster than most site give you - so there's nothing to complain about with d/l speeds on ftv at all in my opinion.
|
07-12-11 10:16am
|
Reply
2
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from gregdd:
(FTV Staff's Reply)
Not doubting the dedication guys. You have a nice site and I know you've put a lot into it. I was just relaying my personal experience from earlier this year.
|
12-07-10 09:50am
|
Reply
3
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(FTV Staff's Reply)
If it wasn't for your regional pricing arrangement with CCBill pushing the price up to $35 for me i would be tempted to sign up too.
|
12-04-10 05:04am
|
Reply
4
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(FTV Staff's Reply)
Rob,
I've often wondered about the proliferation of security cameras everywhere and the effect of that proliferation on your work.
Having been in the retail biz where cctv's are used extensively for shortage control and cash handling control, visible and obvious dummy cameras are used as "decoys" and hi-res "pinhole" cameras that are virtually undetectable to most shoplifters are the ones that are taped and are used as evidence.
I suspect that, because your work is, by and large, "no harm/no foul" in the sense that the venue's management suffers no direct loss, your efforts are observed by far more security people who do not do anything at all (other than, perhaps, get off on what they are watching) than those who do something because they don't want to upset granny when a babe shows what she's made of and granny happens to see the show.
That, to me, is a part of the appeal of your site; that it is a sort of "forbidden fruit."
Thanks for your unique efforts and for making me long to be visiting a Phoenix area resort at the same time as you are doing a shoot.
|
01-28-10 03:11pm
|
Reply
5
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(FTV Staff's Reply)
FTV Staff:
Thanks for clarifying that a key assumption that I made was wrong, namely that the public nudity on your site is ‘staged’ in that you have some arrangements with a resort. I made that assumption based on the large number of nude outdoor scenes made there, and that was an incorrect assumption. My apologies for making the incorrect assumption and I’ve edited my review to remove that.
I will say that now knowing that you don’t ‘cheat’ with the public stuff I’ve got a better appreciation of your site. I understand that given the current political and religious climate in the U.S. that any public nudity involves a lot of personal risk for the models and the staff. I agree with you that the EU sites have the ability to appear to push the envelope a lot more, but knowing that it isn’t really pushing the envelope due to the more liberal views of sexuality in the EU takes away a lot of the excitement found in viewing an American site. Now knowing that you don’t ‘stage’ or pre-arrange the public stuff raises it to a whole different level.
While I understand your dismay in having just one facet of your site reviewed, I tried to make it very clear that my review was only for someone looking at it from that perspective. I really liked your site – the models are stunning and you present them in ways that really show them off well. I give you full credit for that. My intention though, was to get the message out to others who may be like me: having no real interest in solo girl sites, but liking public nudity. I think that anyone who reads my review and wants public nudity will be more apt to consider a membership knowing that there is both quantity and quality.
Thanks for taking the time to correct my review. Having this kind of interaction between customers and webmasters is one of the key reasons that this site is so popular.
|
01-04-10 04:56pm
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|