Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
XL Asians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Watson:
(TheArchitect's Reply)
I am, dear reader, still awaiting "Cassies first hardcore shoot" which had *just* been shot. That is something I was/am still awaiting (having been a member now for months, its not even a pending update). I have logged in regularly since joining, and am still a member therefore I do not feel like informing the owner of my username. I do not "Work" for anybody in the "Industry". As it happens I am a private person who likes BBW, and particularly Asian ones: I like the content, that isnt my beef. I am not getting anything for my thoughts, therefore I call 'em as I see 'em.
Browser issues (happy to use IE), and cam issues (who joins a niche site to Cam when its the same site that everyone else uses?) aside. I did not insinuate that the DVD material was obtained illegally as I never questioned the legal ownership of the material. As to checking the EXIF info - Most were modified 1 year ago (Jan-Nov '10), *some* "recent" updates were modified in 13-Aug to 19-Oct 2011 (still three months old for the most recent). Big gap.
As to deceptiveness: I saw the material (available ON the site AT *my* INITIAL membership, and over the course of the first month or so) in the early months of THIS, 2011, calendar year in a LEGAL collection obtained from the site. (It was this material, WHICH ENCOURAGED ME TO JOIN.)
Now, dear reader, I do not question the difficulty of aquiring the material legally I am simply suggesting that: IF MY FRIEND'S legal collection from quite a few months ago contained all the material available 1-2 months in (length of his stay), AND material found IN his collection included material listed as a "Future Update" AT MY initial date of sign up (much later than his), THEN the material is not IN FACT "new" or an "update" when the his collection existed months prior to my joining. This is what I suggest is deceptive. Particularly taken with the EXIF data in MOST (not all) of the photo zips dating them back to 2010.
I do not question that the owner/poster shot the material himself. I do not suggest that he has collected the material Illegally. I also understand that the site is small and in a niche of which there are almost no sites save a few irritatingly censored ones in Japan. But there are an awful lot of suggested "play video" buttons on the hardcore/softcore pics (~60 total, and second reason why I joined) on the tour as compared to the actual 24 vids + 49 photo sets (as at 9/12/2011) on site. I call that selling a "Sizzle" not a sausage (9 "sausages" to be precise, of which 4 were DVD material that I already owned).
My beef is that I saw the material available AT MY Signup *months* before I joined, in a legal collection belonging to a friend. I like the content. I want more of it. And I am prepared to wait. However I do not like feeling like I have signed up to a site where there are a tonne of "videos/play nows" that dont exist, and a bunch of updates I have already seen at a friends place months prior.
Sincerely
Watson.
|
12-08-11 12:06pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
