Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Paul Raymond.xxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from blayce:
(PaulRaymond's Reply)
Even with the so-called redesign mentioned above, this site still strikes me as a waste of time and money. The videos, including the most recently added, look like they were shot using a cell phone - very poor video quality (although I notice the Paul Raymond logo at the start of each video is nice and crisp - it's a shame they didn't put as much effort into what follows). I suppose it's just as well you can't download any of the videos - I can't see any reason why someone would want to?
The photos sets are just as disappointing. Most are dated 2011 - I could only find a couple dated 2012 (so much for the 2012 redesign). The photos themselves are usually of medium or even small size and of only average resolution; some horizontal-aspect photos aren't even big enough to fill the screen. And the sets are usually small - I found one which contained a measly nine photos!
Overall, I'd say this site would have been unimpressive ten years ago, let alone today. I should have taken a clue from the fact that you can't preview any of the site's content before handing over your money - never a good sign....
|
08-12-12 02:40pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
