Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from heitorcontrol:
(SueAnn's Reply)
Thanks Sue :)
I Love abbywinters.com
|
05-11-10 01:57pm
|
Reply
2
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from greg909:
(SueAnn's Reply)
Sue-Ann,
Regarding the bank problems, I've been told the same thing by AW before, but Wells Fargo Visa still gets rejected through GMBill. I've given up now, and it NEVER offers CCBill as an alternative.
Regarding the new site with big, high quality pics on every set... it is now mid February and it looks exactly the same to me with just the small pics on most sets. So when exactly will all this change?
|
02-13-10 11:06am
|
Reply
3
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dingle:
(SueAnn's Reply)
Hi sue ann-
No no no, its not all about expilcit Vidoes- Im quite happy/very happy with the model just standing there naked or doing a slow twirl/chatting or doing something- softcore all the way so longs as she is showing her body & NOT just sat down or trying to cover her body and chatting-
Get her hoovering, cleaning windows anything to show a whole naked body, I think us men are simple creatures and need at least a good 8 mins of full naked'ness- Thats the key to a mans wallet !!! (Not a hidden or streached out 1 min naked model)
Todays video ( r_jemma ) YES !!! am Very inpressed not just because of the model but how the video has been shot, Its softcore and not expilcit and a new model could do this without doing pink shots and doing stuff she is not comfy with, Open cuboards look for coffee NAKED with a full naked model and showing lady bits...
Yes Yes Yes- This is your old stuff coming back in HQ- !!!!
Buy the lady who shot this video a drink and keep the format.
Looks like im sold to your site IF its this format for 2010....
|
12-11-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
4
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(SueAnn's Reply)
SueAnn -
I think if you read choc chips's review from the perspective of someone not connected with the site, you'll see that it's not all that nice. While I'm sure that the people working to keep AbbyWinters going put a lot of time and effort into it, it should be obvious by the latest reviews and comments here that you're losing people. I realize that the members of PU can't speak for a world-wide community, but, as we submit our comments independently and come from a wide range of tastes ourselves, isn't it obvious that more than a few people are coming to the same conclusions? No matter the reason, be it lack of scripting, more "first-timers" or the over-zealous defense of the site on the forum, things have changed to make it all less appealing.
I'd say playing spin doctor might be one of the big issues now. Instead of focusing on any praise given here, look at the other side of the coin. Reviewers often cite a lack of attractive models as a con on here because that's how the site struck them personally. And, when people say they don't like 20 minutes of clothed action and 2 minutes of skin at the end, they don't see it as "the tease factor". Take a hard look at these, taken from reviews and comments (none of them my own):
- "become a ho-hum triple site of natural girls being coy"
- "both photo sets and videos have become boring because the "tease factor" (according to the webmaster) is being stretched out too much"
- "VERY softcore sometimes out of 10 pages there will be only 2/4 photos of the models fanny,or maybe 2 full lip shoots-thats nearly 80 pics of rubbish"
- "[I] download[ed] this video and watched with horror as i wasted 321gb of pure nonsence"
- "It has been getting less explicit of late"
- "re-subscribed as a returning member recently and let the subscription lapse because things had become so boring"
I seriously doubt we're the only group of people to come to this same conclusion on the site's content. It's just that we're here and able to verbalize it. But, if issues like this aren't addressed (and corrected), I'd say uscue was right - AW probably has passed its peak. And, I'll say it again - it's a shame.
|
09-30-09 04:19pm
|
Reply
5
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(SueAnn's Reply)
Are you that SueAnn? Like in "im-Sue-Ann3vid1HQ.mp4?"
Wow, what a great shoot and what a co-incidence, because I happened to watch that video a couple of hours ago when I tried to decide what to keep and what to get rid of because my hard drives are getting overcrowded! Yours (if it was you) was definitely a keeper. I must say your great personality helped a lot in making that decision as well. Now it's my turn to blush! :-)
And I sincerely hope as well that it was all right to have this short exchange without violating some code. I just wanted to re-assure my friend that mp4 format is fine as long as it isn't viewed through the awkward Quicktime interface. Of course, if I had taken the time to learn the keyboard shortcuts, that probably wouldn't have been a problem. Cheers, and very nice talking to you, SueAnn.
|
08-11-09 07:19pm
|
Reply
6
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(SueAnn's Reply)
You are welcome, SueAnn. And I was going to write: I wouldn't doubt that your hate will turn to love!" Just got finished looking at some of your latest mp4 videos I saved to my hard drive: Wonderful! They are definitely keepers! :-)
|
08-11-09 06:34pm
|
Reply
7
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(SueAnn's Reply)
That's a nice advertisment for the site, but I don't know that you do understand the frustration. I've never really questioned the variety of the models, although I was starting to wonder how many shoots there were going to be of a girl walking through the woods. What I really question is the quality of the content with regards to what we're seeing in the shoots. Obviously, from some of the comments on here about it, I'm not the only one. As different as Abby's might be from other porn sites, it's still a porn site. And, to me, that's always meant skin. And it's not "one particular case". Most of the latest videos and picture sets are sorely lacking in department. 200 and 300+ meg files with 2 or 3 minutes of skin at the end? Picture sets where the model is still clothed more than half way through the set? Sorry - That's not my idea of entertainment. Not now, and I seriously doubt it will be in the future.
|
07-21-09 01:14am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
