Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

What is your biggest porn pet peeve?

Type: General

Submitted by Amanda (0)
A chatty cameraman 25% 5 Votes
Bad camera angles 15% 3 Votes
Poor editing 15% 3 Votes
Using the same setting 5% 1 Votes
Overuse of fake moaning 20% 4 Votes
Other (see reply) 20% 4 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

20 Votes Total

Mar 30, 2017

Poll Replies (8)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (0) I THINK ALL THE FACTORS ARE IMPORTANT, EXCEPT FOR USING THE SAME SETTING, WHICH SEEMS THE LEAST IMPORTANT.
03-31-17  04:29am

Reply To Message

2

Jay G (Disabled) Talking too much. If I want an Oscar winning performance, I don't look for it in my porn.
03-31-17  06:22am

Reply To Message

3

merc77 (Disabled) There are three pet peeves I have not listed above:

1 Shaved models
2 models wearing black or knee length socks
3 old man hand masturbating the models

The shaved look is wrong on men. Period

Models should be totally nude and that includes socks. Just like when I had my physical in the military!

And the old man hand is creepy.

03-31-17  01:49pm

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (Disabled) This is a pretty easy question for me as I usually watch hardcore with no sound (bye fake moans and cameraman logorrhea), and I don't give a damn about the setting unless it conflicts with the position of the camera or the lighting.

Poor editing is what irks me the most. By that I mean that it's too quick or it lingers on someone's face too long.

#2: Bad angles, especially those that upstage the lady with man-ass and dangleberries. It is a close second for sure, now that I think about it.

03-31-17  03:05pm

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (0) All of the above.
03-31-17  04:03pm

Reply To Message

6

Monahan (0) REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :

What Drooler said, but for me it's bad angles first and poor editing second. I have no interest in a closeup of a stud's hairy ass when the position is basic missionary. I also go soundless.

My primary interest is in exploring all of the babe's body parts in various levels of detail including their effective use in various positions and activities.

Setting? What's a setting? Never even thought about it.

03-31-17  09:36pm

Reply To Message

7

skippy (0) I'll repeat what I have in my profile.

Porn quality is an equation. (GIRL)*(SETTING*IMAGE QUALITY*PHOTOGRAPHER SKILL, TALENT AND RAPPORT WITH MODEL)*(SEVERAL OTHER VARIABLES) If any one of them is a 0, the whole thing is a 0.

Setting means location and lighting. Both have to be good with no major distractions.

There are a few sites that shoot backlit "white room" scenes in front of a window and from about 15 feet away. They are high quality but almost entirely from one angle, the side. These are probably the biggest waste of time and talent I've ever seen.

Chatty photographers or overly vocal actors are easy fix by turning off the volume.

04-01-17  03:38am

Reply To Message

8

Homegirl (Disabled) My pet peeve has to be scenes that look all the same over and over.
05-23-20  01:24pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.