| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
no, a "gang" is definitely not 2 people.
|
04-20-17 02:39am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
merc77 (Disabled)
|
ménage à trois or threesome is not a group thing. Not sure if a foursome is considered a group either.
|
04-20-17 09:38am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
careylowell (0)
|
Nope: that's a threesome. To me, a foursome is two couples. A gangbang requires a minimum of three guys.
|
04-20-17 01:13pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THE ARMY SLOGAN, "ARMY OF ONE"?
IF ONE MAN CAN BE AN ARMY, WHY CAN'T ONE GUY BE A GANG?
SO TWO MEN WOULD BE TWO GANGS.
AND THIS WAS BEFORE TRUMP CAME ALONG, WITH HIS "NEW FACTS" THEORIES.
|
04-20-17 04:05pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
pat362 (0)
|
I agree with carey that you need at least three men for it to be a gangbang.
|
04-20-17 05:39pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
superjank (0)
|
Same opinion, it's a MMF threesome or "bi" threesome depending on who's doing what. Not a gangbang.
|
04-23-17 04:14pm
Reply To Message
|
