Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Jurassic Cock (0)

Newbie 79* lk2fireone (0) 04-19-17  06:46am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $17.95/MONTH RECURRING. -PART OF THE PORN PROS BASIC NETWORK. MEMBERSHIP IN ANY OF THE SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO ALL THE SITES IN THE BASIC NETWORK. -NETWORK ACCESS GIVES YOU AROUND 3,000 VIDEOS. (I'M ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS, BECAUSE ANY ADVERTISED STATS ARE SUSPECT: FOR EXAMPLE, THEY STILL ADVERTISE THAT THE BASIC NETWORK HAS 24 SITES, WHICH WAS TRUE SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, BUT IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS, THEY'VE ELIMINATED SITES, AND THE CURRENT NETWORK HAS 17 SITES.) -CAN STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE CONTENTS. NO PREMIUM IS CHARGED FOR DOWNLOADING, UNLIKE SOME SITES WHICH RECENTLY BEGAN CHARGING EXTRA FOR THE ABILITY TO DOWNLOAD CONTENT. -NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS. -VIDEOS HAVE A MATCHING GALLERY. -EACH GALLERY HAS A ZIP FILE. Cons: -TO ENTER THE MEMBERS AREA, HAVE TO ACCEPT/DECLINE THE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PLATINUM STATUS FOR $70. -NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE, WHICH ALLOWS HACKERS TO STEAL YOUR LOGIN DATA. -ADS ON EVERY PAGE. -PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. -NO UPDATES. LAST UPDATE WAS 2011-12-12. Bottom Line: THERE ARE CURRENTLY 17 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. THE NETWORK HAS BEEN DELETING SOME SITES OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS. IN NOVEMBER OF 2016, THE BASIC NETWORK HAD 22 SITES. THE NETWORK ELIMINATED 6 SITES IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS. THE NETWORK ADDED ONE NEW SITE, NAMED "PORNPROS", WHICH IS SIMILAR TO THE NAME OF THE NETWORK. JUST TO MAKE IT MORE CONFUSING. THE PORNPROS SITE CURRENTLY HAS 1 UPDATE. THE SITE NAME, FOLLOWED BY THE NUMBER OF SCENES, CURRENT AS OF 2017-04-18: 18yearsold - 489 Updates 40ozbounce - 119 Updates Cockcompetition - 40 Updates Crueltyparty - 64 Updates Deepthroatlove - 294 Updates Disgraced18 - 21 Updates Eurohumpers - 21 Updates Flexiblepositions - 27 Updates Freaksofboobs - 62 Updates Freaksofcock - 183 Updates Jurassiccock - 80 Updates Massagecreep - 212 Updates Pimpparade - 33 Updates PornPros - 1 Update Realexgirlfriends - 592 Updates Shadypi - 97 Updates Teenbff - 236 Updates THE 6 SITES THEY ELIMINATED RECENTLY INCLUDE: Amateurviolations Cumdisgrace Cumshotsurprise Lolcumshots Milfhumiliation Squirtdisgrace MOST OF THE SITES HAVE NOT UPDATED IN YEARS. IN THE LAST 30 DAYS, THE BASIC NETWORK HAS ADDED 4 NEW SCENES. THE SITES WITH NEW SCENES IN THE LAST 30 DAYS ARE: Massagecreep - 1 NEW SCENE RealExGirlfriends - 2 NEW SCENES PornPros - 1 NEW SCENE THE LAST NEW SCENE FOR JURASSIC COCK WAS 2011-12-12. JURASSIC COCK HAS 80 SCENES. THE THEME IS AN OLDER GUY SHTUPPING A YOUNG WOMAN OR YOUNG GIRL. (I SAY SHTUPPING, BECAUSE I'M TRYING TO BE POLITE. JOKE.) ANYWAY, THE SITE FEATURES HARDCORE SEX, WITH VERY LITTLE PLOT. THE PLOT IS THAT THE OLDER GUY IS MORE EXPERIENCED THAN SOME YOUNG GUY, SO THE GIRL WILL HAVE A BETTER SEXUAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE OLDER MAN. THE NICHE (OLD GUYS SHTUPPING YOUNG WOMEN) IS NOT WELL SERVED. TEEN MEGA WORLD HAS A NICHE SITE FOR THIS CATEGORY, PORN PROS (THE CURRENT NETWORK UNDER REVIEW) HAS ONE, TRICKY OLD TEACHER, OLD YOUNG ANAL, GRANDDADZ, AND A FEW OTHER SITES. THE SITES I MENTIONED ARE OLDER-MEN-WITH-YOUNG-WOMEN. THERE ARE ALSO OLDER-WOMEN-WITH-YOUNG-MEN SITES, AS WELL. MOST SITES IN THIS NICHE ARE SMALL. LESS THAN 100 SCENES. SOME OF THE MODELS IN THIS NICHE ARE SUPRISINGLY ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEENS/EARLY TWENTY GIRLS. GETTING BACK TO THE JURASSIC COCK SITE SPECIFICS: THE VIDEOS CAN BE DOWNLOADED OR STREAMED. STREAMING IS OFFERED IN STANDARD AND HIGH DEFINITION. DOWNLOADS ARE OFFERED IN MP4 480P, MP4 1080P, WMV 1080P. A SIDE NOTE: THE TECHNICAL QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS POOR TO JUST OK. IF THE SCENE IS SHOT OUTSIDE, THERE ARE RANDOM NOISES THAT INTRUDE ON THE SOUNDTRACK. THE LIGHTING IS NATURAL LIGHING. THE SETS AND COSTUMES/CLOTHES ARE CHEAP. NO EFFORT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. AND THE STUNT COCKS (THE OLDER GUYS) ARE REAL SLOBS. THE OVERALL ATTRACTIVE OF THE MODELS IS BELOW THE STANDARD OF THE NETWORK AS A WHOLE. NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO CHOOSE ATTRACTIVE YOUNG TEEN-EARLY-TWENTY GIRLS. AS LONG AS THE GIRLS WERE YOUNG AND WILLING TO FUCK, THEY WERE ACCEPTABLE. AT SOME OF THE OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK, SUCH AS Massagecreep AND Realexgirlfriends, THE MODELS ARE BOTH YOUNG AND ATTRACTIVE. REVIEW CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (10) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 lk2fireone (0) REVIEW CONTINUED (BOTTOM LINE): I AM GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 79, BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS. IF THE SITE WAS SCORED AS A STAND-ALONE-SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE LOWER, BECAUSE: 1. THE LIMITED AMOUNT OF CONTENT AT THE SITE (80 VIDEOS). 2. THE SITE STOPPED UPDATING YEARS AGO. 3. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS JUST OK. NO ATTEMPT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. THE SETTINGS AND CLOTHES ARE CHEAP. 04-19-17  06:51am Reply To Message 2 careylowell (0) Bad news: this review and many of your other ones are in upper case. 04-20-17  01:11pm Reply To Message 3 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #2 - careylowell : I'M GETTING OLD. I WRITE IN UPPER CASE BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, EDIT. NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE. BUT IT'S EASIER FOR ME, THAN TRYING TO SEE LOWER-CASE LETTERS, SOMETIMES I PUT THE REASON FOR THE UPPER CASE IN MY REPLIES/COMMENTS/REVIEWS, SOMETIMES NOT. 04-20-17  03:21pm Reply To Message 4 careylowell (0) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone : By golly, that's the one excellent reason for using upper case. I won't release the dobermans... As for getting old, expect befuddled me to forget your explanation & post a similar comment inside of six months. 04-20-17  06:30pm Reply To Message 5 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #4 - careylowell : THANKS FOR THE KIND RESPONSE. AT MY AGE, I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO OUTRUN DOBERMANS. EVEN WHEN I WAS YOUNGER, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT. BE WELL. PS: (WHAT'S SURPRISING TO ME, IS THAT I DON'T LIKE READING LARGE-PRINT BOOKS. I PREFER THE REGULAR, SMALL-SIZED PRINT. IT MUST BE A PSYCHOLOGY THING, BECAUSE LARGE-PRINT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ.) 04-20-17  09:05pm Reply To Message 6 rearadmiral (0) Thanks for reviewing this site. Back when it was active it was one of my favourite sites because it had a niche I love - old guy, young girl - with American models. I've been dropping in to the tour page but the way it's set up it's hard to tell if there are any new scenes since the last time I was there. Thanks to you I now know that there aren't. you saved me some possible frustration. 04-22-17  12:57pm Reply To Message 7 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #6 - rearadmiral : THANKS FOR THE KIND WORDS. SINCE VERY FEW PEOPLE REPLY OR COMMENT ON THE REVIEWS ANY MORE, IT'S HARD TO TELL IF ANYONE READS THEM. OR APPRECIATES THEM. STAY WELL. 04-22-17  05:40pm Reply To Message 8 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #7 - lk2fireone : I agree with you. I'm making it a point these days to post positive feedback as often as I can. 04-23-17  06:30am Reply To Message 9 careylowell (0) REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone : ...THE PEOPLE I KNOW WHO WOULD PREFER LARGE-TYPE BOOKS COMPLAIN THAT PUBLISHERS HAVE LIMITED THEIR FONT CHOICES TO JUST TWO, MAYBE THREE, STYLES OUT OF THE 177,012 CHOICES AVAILABLE. AND THESE THREE ARE UGLY. 07-04-17  06:50pm Reply To Message 10 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #9 - careylowell : I'VE NEVER REALLY THOUGHT ABOUT IT. I DO KNOW I'VE TRIED READING LARGE-SIZED BOOKS MANY TIMES. SOME OF THEM WERE COPIES OF BOOKS I HAVE ENJOYED READING IN THE PAST. BUT FOR SOME REASON, THERE WAS NO PLEASURE IN READING THE LARGE-SIZED BOOK VERSION. BUT I THINK THE FONT STYLE MIGHT BE WHY I DID NOT ENJOY THE LARGE-PRINT BOOKS. I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THIS UNTIL YOU POINTED IT OUT. I MUST BE DUMB, IN A WAY. BUT I CAN ACCEPT THAT. BECAUSE IT'S THE WAY I AM, AND I CAN'T CHANGE IT. 07-04-17  11:34pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.