| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pinkerton (0)
|
It's a fact of life that the majority of women aren't perfect in every way so blemishes and imperfections or no big deal for me, and besides, hi-def video looks great in every respect so I don't notice the flaws.
|
12-01-07 05:38am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
ace of aces (0)
|
how wants to have a perfect woman? ;)
|
12-01-07 07:22am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
nygiants03 (0)
|
the sites I join the girls really have no flaws. I love digital desire high-def pics, and i never notice any flaws.
|
12-01-07 07:56am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
apoctom (0)
|
The beauty of hi-def is that it "more than photo-realistic." It shows details that make that "perfect" model more human.
Plus, most of the time, you have to be looking awfully close to see these minor skin blemishes. Do you really need to be searching that hard for flaws?
|
12-01-07 08:07am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Denner (0)
|
A little strange poll, I think.
HD-videos don't have flaws in general. But what some of them have is way too high file-sizes. For one: I've downloaded HD-files at almost 2,0 Gb (Sexy Goa). A size that does several things - among others:
Fill up your drive and make viewing more complicated.
Second extremely large HD wmv-files makes it uneasy and slow to scan the video - by scanning I mean forwarding to special areas in the video.
|
12-01-07 09:18am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
I agree with Ace - Who wants a perfect woman? If I like the content I'm getting from a site, I want it to be as clear as possible. Warts and all as it were...
Denner - I used to have the same problem. But I've found that WinAmp, for some reason, doesn't buffer wmv files like WMP does - and you can skip all over a file, with no waiting for the buffering. The file sizes I can't help you with. At least take comfort in the fact that drives are relative cheap, with cost per gig being about as low as they've ever been. Look for specials online - I've managed to get a 1TB drive for under $300US and a couple of 750's for even less than that. It doesn't seem all that long ago, we were paying $200+ for 120 gigs
|
12-01-07 10:19am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
User (0)
|
Hi-def is the best. Who cares about flaws? I love flaws on women who are beautiful; makes them more human. Let's face it, hi-def is the way of the future for those with hi-speed connections. Bring em on.
|
12-01-07 12:42pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
kkman112 (0)
|
I probably would have never even noticed had it not been that I read and article about that a while ago. Since then I have noticed, but I think it's actually a bigger turn-on to see women with a few flaws than a woman who goes all out to hide them or photo/video editing. Truth-be-told, I don't mind. I woman with a few flaws is much hotter than those who edit their appearance ether digitally, surgically, or with makeup.
To date, I have seen quite a few HD videos featuring women with a few flaws, and I enjoy it better than the low-res version in which you can barely notice it or is pixelated.
Denner - I agree with RagingBuddhist. Data storage prices are lower than ever and are continuing to fall. The beginning of this year an 80GB hd was $150+. Today, I could pick one up for about $20-30. Size is not an issue with me. No pun intended. :)
|
12-01-07 05:18pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
SnowDude (0)
|
Overall I don't notice the flaws, but when I do it just makes the girls look a bit more real.
|
12-01-07 08:59pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
jd1961 (0)
|
This will sound weird, but with the hi-res photos I notice a lot teeth decay!
|
12-02-07 04:03am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
pat362 (0)
|
I much prefer the flaws than the photoshop look of today.
|
12-02-07 08:42am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - ace of aces :
I don't!!
|
12-02-07 11:20pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - apoctom :
HA HA HA... :)
|
12-02-07 11:36pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
Hmmm, hi definition pussy, eh? Sounds great! :)
|
12-02-07 11:40pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Denner :
Funny how hi-def brings with it a new set of problems: greater stretches of precious hard drive real estate getting traded for a clearer view of zits, scars, scratches, welts, birthmarks, and (as jd pointed out) dental cavities in progress.
I'm chuckling because it's just one more example of how solutions nearly always mean new problems. Like the automobile. When was last time we had to step around horse manure on the street? (Whoops, the street's under water now!) LOL.
C'est la vie!
|
12-08-07 06:38am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #15 - Drooler :
Good to hear from you again, Drooler...
And yeah, new stuff brings on new problems - but it's still something to debate - and funny you should mention automobiles - as my profession among others - is test-driving for european car-manufactures....
Well, small world.
Come on, my man - get back soon!
A lot of us miss your great inputs.
Denner
|
12-08-07 07:25am
Reply To Message
|
17
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #16 - Denner :
Denner, have you test-driven that car from France that runs on air? Seriously, I saw it on TV. It runs on compressed air and does pretty well from what the documentary said.
How does this relate? Well, surely you think about porn while testing the cars.
And we don't want the polar ice caps melting and flooding those precious porno web servers.
|
12-08-07 09:38am
Reply To Message
|
18
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #17 - Drooler :
Well, Drooler
No, I have not tested that one - I do the tests on models close to release, so to speak.
And, yeah - while doing an 18 hours drive through the Sahara dessert what is there to think about - in between - but good sex....
And in US: look out for the new Audis - here in Europe they're passing the BMW and Mercedes. But I guess in US the prime stuff is still Lexus?
|
12-08-07 10:30am
Reply To Message
|
19
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #18 - Denner :
On the US popularlity of the Lexus, I don't know how it stands these days. But I look at some of the Audis and just start salivating.
Hey, good one on "testing models close to release, so to speak." Wow. Clever! I mean, we NEED to keep things kinda dirty here.
|
12-08-07 02:56pm
Reply To Message
|
20
|
Davit (0)
|
Hi Def is so overrated for me. I'm happy with good old DVD quality. Shows more than enough close detail for me. Most HD porn I've seen is crap, as if all the attention has gone into the technical quality of the movie, and nothing else.
Another point, and I'm sure I can't be alone on this - my processor does struggle a little with HD, especially when it comes to FFing through a movie. And I find that the gains in definition do not merit the massive file sizes, compared with DVD quality.
|
02-28-08 04:41pm
Reply To Message
|
