Errotica Archives (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates, either photosets or videos (vids are one or two per week).
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Beautiful girls |
| Cons: |
Site layout is not quite as good as Met Art, but still better than a lot of sites on the interwebs.
Limited Model Information – measurements and home country
Very little striptease action here – in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
No sexual activity of any kind – the emphasis is on beauty. |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it has evolved to be more of a multi-photographer site. Erro continues to contribute, but only a few times per month.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. For example, Iveta has 41 galleries posted from 2007 to 2013, with a handful after that. Nikky has 43 galleries posted from 2006 to 2013. Belle (aka Indiana A) has 37 sets from 2011 to 2015. Antea appears in 204 galleries (!) from 2006 to 2017.
Lately, it has started to feel a lot more like its sister site, Erotic Beauty. It seems like just one more place for various models to post a set or two that didn’t get posted at Met Art. There is still a lot of high quality content here, but Errotica Archives no longer feels as unique as it once did.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near another – no sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
The site boasts 319 Models. It’s hard to get a good count on the total number of photo galleries, but the main site goes back to 2005, and the archives contain some sets from 2004. There are over 600 videos.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
