Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art X

Met Art X (0)

Newbie
84*
LadyLover (0) 09-14-17  07:54pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Daily Updates, either a photo set or video, with about a 3:2 ratio of videos to photos

Excellent technical quality

Wide variety of locales

Gorgeous girls, including many favorites from Met Art

Excellent navigation and web design

Good browsing, streaming, and downloading speeds

HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Cons: Occasional logon problems that have been plaguing the entire Met Art network recently – maybe once or twice a month

Has the feeling of girls putting on a show, rather than girls enjoying themselves
Bottom Line: Solo masturbation photo sets and videos are the raison d’etre for this site, and they do these very well. The technical implementation of the sets are everything you would expect from a Met Art network site.

The site only started up in March 2016, and there are currently over 330+ videos and 220+ photo sets on the site. They have adhered to a daily update schedule since their inception, and they show no sign of slowing down, so there is plenty of content here.

Maybe it’s just me, but I did not find this site to be among my favorites. There’s nothing to complain about from a technical or quality aspect. The girls are gorgeous. So why is my reaction kind of meh?

For one thing, from a story telling aspect, there’s a lot less that can be done with one person in the video instead of two, so there is a repetitiveness that is inevitable in this kind of site.

I think the other thing that disappointed me is that I hoped for more feeling of intimacy. As I said in the cons above, it has the feeling of girls putting on a show. And yeah, I know, duh, that is exactly what they are doing. But at their other network sites like Viv Thomas and Sex Art, they do achieve that suspension of disbelief where you feel like you are watching a genuine story of some kind.

The videos have a rote aspect to them in most cases. The first part is the girl teasing for the camera to get the guys aroused. Then it’s time to go masturbate. This one-two formula is quite common.

What I am hoping they can achieve is a feeling of getting closer to the models. For my favorite example, I’d offer up Michaela Isizzu in “Alone” over at Sex Art. I’ve watched that video 50 times and it never gets old. So they do have it in them.

Standard membership rates are $29.99 per month and $99.99 per year. The PU discount brings the monthly charge down to 19.99.

The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.

One other thing – I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount – and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) – so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So this can be a good way to get a lifetime membership for a bit of a discount to any network site, or else pick up a monthly or annual discount for some second site. But the time limit on the discount makes it very helpful for you to know ahead of time that it is being offered, so you can think about it a little before hitting the join button.

The Bottom Line is this is a very well executed site. For me, some of the artistry isn’t quite there yet. But if you are really into masturbation photos and videos, this site is definitely worth a look.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Monahan (0) I found that there's a lot of crossover of babes from the original Met site and this one.
09-15-17  06:28pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

MOST METART SITES USE MANY OF THE SAME MODELS.
WHICH CAN BE GOOD OR BAD: DEPENDING ON WHETHER YOU LIKE THE MODELS.

09-16-17  06:14am

Reply To Message

3

Monahan (0) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

I wasn't clear. The crossover characteristic is, for me, an uptick. Met Art has some real knockouts that do more substantial things with their lovely bodies than showing off their assets.
09-16-17  05:30pm

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #3 - Monahan :

METART IS BASICALLY SOFTCORE.
EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, YOU FIND A METART MODEL IN ONE OF THE METART SISTER SITES IN A HOT PHOTOSET OR VIDEO THAT GIVES YOU A NEW APPRECIATION OF THE MODEL.
OR, EVEN RARER, YOU COME ACROSS THE MODEL IN A COMPETING SITE, THAT IS HARDCORE, AND YOU DEFINITELY SEE THE MODEL IN A NEW LIGHT.
MAYBE I'M SLOW, BUT WHEN I VIEW THE METART PHOTOSETS, I THINK OF THE MODELS AS BASICALLY INNOCENT GLAMOUR MODELS.
WATCHING THE SAME MODEL PERFORMING HARDCORE PORN MAKES A DIFFERENCE. SOMETIMES THE DIFFERENCE IS JUST HOW HOT THE MODEL CAN LOOK. OTHER TIMES, I THINK THE MODEL IS WASTING HER OPPORTUNITIES APPEARING IN SUCH LOW-GRADE PORN.
BUT THAT'S JUST ME.

09-16-17  05:46pm

Reply To Message

5

LadyLover (0) REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :

that's definitely true. I think for some models this is the "next step" before trying a twosome. And some never move beyond the solo sets.
09-20-17  03:34pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.