Give Me Teens (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
-SECURE SITE PAGES.
-CHOICE OF DEFINITIONS FOR STREAMING AND/OR DOWNLOAD FOR SOME OF THE MORE RECENT VIDEOS:
160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-YOU GET THE SAME CHOICES OF DEFINITION FOR YOUR DOWNLOAD OF THE VIDEO FILE.
-FILES DOWNLOAD WITH THE DEFAULT NAME OF THE TITLE + THE MODEL, BUT YOU PROBABLY WANT TO ADD MORE DETAILS TO THE FILENAME FOR RECORD-KEEPING.
-FIRST MONTH PU/TBP DISCOUNT OF $14.95. RECURS AT $29.95/MONTH.
-24/7 CUSTOMER SUPPORT THAT IS VERY RESPONSIVE (CHAT).
-CONFIRMING EMAILS ON JOIN GIVE COMPLETE DETAILS: LOGIN DETAILS, CREDIT CARD USED (LAST 4 DIGITS), PRICE AND TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP. |
Cons: |
-NETWORK AND SITE STRUCTURE RECENTLY UPDATED. MAKING THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO USE.
-SOMETIMES THERE IS A SURVEY PAGE, ASKING FOR PERSONAL DETAILS. I WAS WILLING TO START FILLING OUT ONE SURVEY, BUT THEN THEY STARTED ASKING A LOT OF PERSONAL DETAILS, AND I DON'T THINK IT'S SMART TO GIVE OUT SO MANY DETAILS ABOUT YOURSELF TO A SURVEY-ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING ALL THE HACKING THAT'S BEEN EXPOSED IN THE NEWPAPERS RECENTLY.
THIS SURVEY WANTED TO KNOW MY AGE, LEVEL OF EDUCATION, IF I AM REGISTERED TO VOTE, IF I VOTED IN THE LAST NATIONAL ELECTION, WHO I VOTED FOR, ETC. ETC. I MEAN, IT WAS RIDICULOUS.
-UPDATED HOT LINKS AT THE SITE/NETWORK ARE MUCH LESS RESPONSIVE THAN THE OLD HOT LINKS WERE.
-UPDATED HOT LINKS ARE HARDER TO FIND.
-WHEN YOU STREAM A VIDEO, IF YOU MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT (PAUSE THE VIDEO, OR SWITCH FROM FULL-SCREEN TO SMALLER VIEW), THE SOUND HAS A TENDENCY TO GO MUTE. THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM FOR ALL THE NETWORK SITES. |
Bottom Line: |
SITE STATS (FROM A WEB PAGE, WHICH IS OFTEN MISLEADING OR OUTDATED):
MOVIES 1357
DVDs 361
PORNSTARS 1338
PICTURES 0
I HAVE A PARTIAL APOLOGY TO MAKE.
I CRITICIZED THE RECENT UPDATE TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, SAYING IT MADE THE NETWORK SITES HARDER TO NAVIGATE.
THAT IS STILL TRUE.
I NORMALLY WATCH PORN ON A 5-YEAR-OLD LAPTOP WITH A 14" SCREEN.
WATCHING THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK SITES ON A NEWER, 25" MONITOR, GIVES
A MUCH BRIGHTER PICTURE, AND IT'S EASIER TO SEE WHAT'S ON THE SCREEN.
WHEN I WROTE THE RECENT FAME DIGITAL UPDATE (MADE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO) WAS A HORRIBLE MISTAKE, I WAS OVER-REACTING. THE UPDATE DOES MAKE THE SITE AND NETWORK HARDER TO NAVIGATE, BUT IT'S NOT AS BAD AS WHAT I FIRST THOUGHT, BECAUSE ON MY LAPTOP MONITOR I COULDN'T MAKE OUT ALL THE LINKS THAT ARE SHOWN.
A BETTER MONITOR MAKES SOME OF THE LINKS EASIER TO FIND.
HOWEVER, THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS EASIER TO USE:
TO SEE WHAT NETWORK SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO;
TO NAVIGATE BETWEEN SITES;
TO NAVIGATE INSIDE A SITE.
SO THE NETWORK UPDATE IS A MISTAKE, BECAUSE IT MAKES USING THE SITE/NETWORK CONTENTS HARDER.
AND THAT TAKES AWAY FROM THE VALUE OF THE SITE/NETWORK.
A SIMPLE EXAMPLE:
YOU WANT TO SWITCH FROM ONE SITE TO CURRY CREAMPIE. YOU HAVE TO HOVER YOUR MOUSE OVER THE WHITE GHETTO LINK, TO BRING UP THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK, THEN SELECT THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK TO ENTER THAT SITE. THE CURRY CREAMPIE LINK IS ONLY VISIBLE WHEN YOUR MOUSE BRINGS UP THE WHITE GHETTO SUB-SITES.
I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO WRITE A SITE INSTRUCTION MANUAL INSIDE A REVIEW.
BUT UNLESS YOU PLAY AROUND, YOU WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A LOT OF THE NETWORK CONTENTS--YOU WON'T KNOW IT'S THERE, THE OLDER STRUCTURE HAD SIMPLER NAVIGATION.
MAYBE YOU CAN CALL CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND ASK FOR HELP NAVIGATING THE SITE.
I CALLED CUSTOMER SUPPORT, AND THEY WERE HELPFUL GETTING ME INTO DEVILS FILM SITE.
AT THE DEVILS FILM WEBSITE, I ENTERED MY CURRENT LOGIN DETAILS, AND THE PAGE GAVE ME AN ERROR MESSAGE THAT MY LOGIN DETAILS WERE INCORRECT.
I CALLED CUSTOMER SERVICE, THEY TOLD ME TO TRY CLEARING MY CACHE.
THAT WORKED.
THE SITE (EVIDENTLY) REFUSED ME ENTRANCE BECAUSE MY PC HAD STORED THE LOGIN DETAILS FROM A PREVIOUS MEMBERSHIP.
SO CUSTOMER SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 24/7, AND THEY RESPOND WITHIN A FEW MINUTES IF YOU START A CHAT.
SOME OF THE MODELS LOOK LIKE TEENS, BUT MANY DO NOT.
ANOTHER SITE CON IS THAT THE SITE IS NOT CLEARLY SEPARATED FROM THE OTHER NETWORK SITES: THE SITE SHOWS THUMBNAILS (OF THE VIDEOS), AND YOU DON'T REALIZE UNTIL YOU CLICK THE VIDEO THAT IT'S FROM ANOTHER SITE. WHAT'S INSIDE THE "GIVE ME TEENS SITE" IS NOT SEPARATED CLEARLY.
AND YOU HAVE TO FIGURE OUT, WHILE WATCHING A VIDEO, WHAT SITE THE VIDEO BELONGS TO.
IT'S A JUMBLED MESS.
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 75.
THERE ARE MUCH BETTER SITES AVAILABLE, BOTH FOR THE QUALITIES OF THEIR MODELS, AND SITE EASE OF USE.
SO WHY AM I GIVING IT A SCORE IN THE 70s?
NOT FOR THE SITE ITSELF.
THIS SITE IS PART OF THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK.
WHICH HAS SOME SITES WORTH VIEWING:
ROCCO SIFFREDI
PETER NORTH
DEVILS FILM
I'M GIVING THE SITE, "GIVE ME TEENS", A SCORE OF 75.
I WISH THEY WOULD BRING BACK THE OLD DROP-DOWN-MENU, WHICH MADE SITE NAVIGATION EASIER. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|