Lust Cinema (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Unique format: audience participation. Details in BL.
-Careful attention to believable dialogue and real-world, non-motel room settings.
-Peopled by unknowns.
-Wide range of sexual activities
-Sizable % of directors are female and/or former performers. Your Significant Other will appreciate.
-The Xconfessions section of the site claims actual couples are hired. If true, they appear to make up just under half of performers. 'Couples' available in search. Own a large room? Host a screening!
-Several ethnics on display. I believe there's two Roma.
-Under eighteen bucks per month via pornusers.com
-Maybe its acting, but everyone appears to be having a grand time.
-Some scenes are just as I like them: women loud as a drunken Irish bee hive. |
| Cons: |
-One DVD release a week.
-Some descriptions are in French or Spanish.
-For those into gonzo, your succor will be small.
-Male homosexual acts appear in a handful of vids presented as hetro. This is not counting the six or seven which are fully male and described as such. I’m assuming this is an enormous road block for some viewers. |
| Bottom Line: |
Idea wise, the porn world has been in arrears. Thankfully, in the xconfessions section, members can submit written sexual fantasies, which if okayed by founder Erika Lust, are farmed out to various directors.
Neat, huh? Those that don't make the grade but are still considered somewhat exciting are posted.
Despite the relatively small output, I admire Lust trying to make a go at this. Lust entered porn in the late ‘90s and, I'm happy to report, received a thorough grounding in wickedness.
For those feeling soiled by owning, say, twenty gigs of bestiality, shot without a tripod inside a badly lit storage shed with beauty impaired performers, here's a chance to add class to your stash. Your estate executor will appreciate it. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
