Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Shoplyfter

Shoplyfter (0)

Newbie
70*
BoyWithaProblem (0) 02-25-18  07:09am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Unusual story format
70+ videos
1920 x 1080 at 12K or lower resolutions available
Weekly updates
Cons: Too much 'story' before the sex
Large file sizes due to the above
Undressing/searching too quick
Camera work too distant & lacking closeups
All younger and often skinny models
Bottom Line: I'm not going to repeat rearadmiral's typically thorough 2017 review, just add a few thoughts as a recent (2018) subscriber.

Potential joiners should be aware that movies run for about 1 hour each (give or take 5 mins) and in best quality are over 4Gb each. Despite this sizable investment in download time/HDD space, there is a very slow build-up to the actual sex; typically 15-20 mins before ANY item of clothing is removed!

Whilst some may value this delay as a tension builder, whilst the model plays the 'anxious criminal' waiting (often alone) in the storeroom, most will find it a dull waste of time & space and probably skip it.

When the young felon is finally undressed & searched by the deviant Security Guard, this process is ironically quite brief. Worse, it's shot from fairly distant/static camera angles (perhaps aiming for a 'fly on the wall' voyeur perspective?) which feel dated and unrevealing by modern porn standards.

When the sex finally begins in earnest, it's fairly vanilla flavoured stuff, hampered by the bizarre need to pixellate the male actor's face area. Why? Not only is this weird (name me another site that does this) it means that when his head nears the model's body, that too is briefly pixelated. This is unforgivable.

The models play the part of a young thief reluctantly surrendering to the wayward guard (to avoid Police intervention) surprisingly well; even better when the mother sits beside them telling them to take their punishment.

But in an era of detailed, brightly lit close-ups of pornstars’ bodies, I felt cheated out of the slow lingering strip-search and detailed examination which should surely be this site’s USP. This is after all almost CMNF porn in effect (though the guard later also undresses fully) with her humiliation and embarrassment just what the whole thing should be about. Otherwise it’s just plain porn with an irrelevant (unchanging) 20 minute story beforehand.

I think as well that porn needs curves, and too many young/skinny models is never a good direction to take. Are there no middle-aged or fat thieves in the USA?

I so want this site format to improve and succeed. Given the high video resolution and duration/filesize, the owners haven’t skimped as many others might.

Overall, I think the novel format will appeal to anyone seeking scenes replicating domination/abuse by authority figures. But with that delivered, I just want to feel I’ve then watched something more intimate and intrusive than a backroom sex scene.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (0) This site is part of the Team Skeet network.
Some PU members have complained they have problems connecting to the Team Skeet network: very slow connection speeds that make streaming or downloading difficult.

Did you personally experience any slow connection speeds to the Shoplyfter, or any of the other Team Skeet sites you might have visited?

Also, what do you think about the recent Team Skeet re-design (if you accessed it)?
The re-design is supposed to make the network appear fresher, more appealing: but I find it makes site navigation harder.

02-25-18  10:06am

Reply To Message

2

BoyWithaProblem (0) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

I was aware of the other Team Skeet sites, but didn't really get around to trying them, perhaps because collecting all these 4Gb downloads took quite a bit of time! I can't say I noticed any speed issues however.

It is praiseworthy that this Company is persuing novel storylines; porn seems to have turned full circle and now we're back seeking the storylines which went out of fashion way back when. I guess when pretty well anything sexual has been done on some pornsite or other, we're left looking for some background situation/acting that injects a little spice again. But I just wish they'd used their bandwidth more creatively than here.

02-26-18  11:15am

Reply To Message

3

rearadmiral (0) I enjoyed reading your review. Thanks for posting it.

I'm someone who really enjoys a scene set-up. I like it when a site creates a sexual tension. But I definitely agree with you that the set-up here simply goes on too long. And more than that, the set-up isn't creating sexual tension. It seems to be more along the lines of fear or coercion. Both of those can be sexy in the right context, but I think most of the scenes here fall short of being sexy.

One thing I completely disagree with you on is this:

"I think as well that porn needs curves, and too many young/skinny models is never a good direction to take. Are there no middle-aged or fat thieves in the USA?"

Noooooo!!!! As someone who loves younger and petite models please don't mess with this part of the formula! :-)

I don't think I've taken the opportunity to welcome you to PornUsers. This is a great site with a lot of regular members who are easy to get along with. Some of them are walking porn encyclopedias so members like me get to take advantage of that.

02-27-18  03:54am

Reply To Message

4

BoyWithaProblem (0) REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :

Hi rearadmiral - thanks for the positive comments and welcome!

As well as all the valuable information from frequent posters like yourself, I think this forum offers the chance for users to influence the pornsites themselves. This is very valuable. I'm guessing they probably do read what people take the time to write, I know some have replied here.

Otherwise, pornsites have only good or bad subscription figures to give them the broadest of directions on what works or doesn't. Feedback is, after all, the Breakfast of Kings.

I've seen some of your recommendations and sites I think you said you regularly join, so had guessed our tastes differ on model size. Strange, isn't it? The modern trend for slimmer girls, sometimes with almost boyish figures, just leaves me cold. Like I haven't got what I paid for.

Or maybe it's an age thing? Wasn't Marylyn Monroe's hourglass figure just the definition of sex? Has that really gone? The next stop after Slim in the porn world seems to be BBW, often meaning hugely fat, with little in between. It may also be that plump figures are more the 'girl nextdoor' look which we find subliminably attainable.

True MILFs can deliver this, but often even that word is used to cover a 30 year old model with a 20 year old's figure, hardly the point.

Perhaps I will start a thread in its own right sometime about this. As well as all seeking certain figures/features we find appealing, there is so much porn out there already that we all seek something different and more real.

02-27-18  11:20am

Reply To Message

5

rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #4 - BoyWithaProblem :

I agree that there is evidence that at least some webmasters and site owners lurk here and may be taking what we say to heart. I rarely see any criticism that isn't constructive unless that criticism is clearly warranted.

(Now that I think of it, several years ago I reviewed a streaming-only site that didn't go out of its way to make that clear. I stated it clearly in my review and later the webmaster threatened legal action. An odd response I thought...)

Just so you know though, you may have misread my original reply to you and you may want to disown me now. I am most definitely a fan of the 18-20 petite look. There are some staggeringly stunning 30+ models out there and I have some of their stuff. Jenni Lee comes to mind, for example. But most of the time, it's young and petite for me. I hope we can still be friends!

02-27-18  02:33pm

Reply To Message

6

BoyWithaProblem (0) REPLY TO #5 - rearadmiral :

Hi rearadmiral - yes rather odd to be threatened with legal action for telling the truth. Not sure that case would have got very far!

No, I correctly read you as liking petite models, and that's no problem. I wish I could too, as it's the way so many young girls want to be anyway. I just wish there were more sites capitalising on fuller figures without going for the outright huge. I'm open to suggestions.

Perhaps one of the better/more realistic I've stumbled accross has been Dirty Director, though I'd point out that it seems to have stopped updating due to the one-man pornstar/cameraman having had an accident, from which I can only hope he recovers and resumes filming.

Whilst perhaps rather too crude/raw for those seeking polished work, and having no shortage of simply huge women, it did also have quite a few fuller figure/girl nextdoor types, never seen before or since on camera, and enjoying what they did.

02-28-18  11:53am

Reply To Message

7

rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #6 - BoyWithaProblem :

I can't really give you many recommendations for sites you might like but aren't yet aware of because our tastes are different, but I keep getting promotions for a site called "Fucking Awesome." I find that most of the models there are slightly older (30, plus or minus a bit) and tend to have curvier figures. I can't vouch for the site but you may want to have a look.
02-28-18  02:25pm

Reply To Message

8

BoyWithaProblem (0) REPLY TO #7 - rearadmiral :

Thanks for the suggestion, I've had a quick look and appears interesting if not huge. I'll let you know. Cheers.
03-01-18  10:35am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.