MetArt (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-In my opinion, the finest softcore glamour site on the internet.
-The site is best of breed. For softcore teen photos. No other site comes close in terms of number of sets, frequency of updates. MPL Studios and Femjoy and some other sites are great, but MetArt is number one.
-Currently, MetArt has a PU discount of $9.99 for the first month, recurring at $19.99/month.
This is one of the lowest prices I seen for MetArt at $9.99 for the first month.
-The largest catalog of softcore glamour photo sets on the Internet. See bottom line for the current statistics.
-A large number of contributing photographers. So you get a variety of approaches. Not all sets will appeal to any one person, but if you are into softcore teen photos, this site should have plenty of content that will satisfy your needs.
I paid for a lifetime membership several years back, because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly memberships. It was the first porn site I paid for a lifetime membership. |
Cons: |
PROS (CONTINUED):
-A large catalog of models: some of the cutest or most attractive teens on the planet.
However, you can also find a huge number of attractive teens at competing sites such as MPL Studios or Femjoy or other glamour style sites.
-Secure login and member pages: https.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the finest customer services of any porn site I've ever dealt with.
The reps are friendly and helpful.
CONS -The cons are stricly minor.
-The sheer size of the site: it's the largest softcore teen site on the internet. You stare at thousands of photos of gorgeous girls, and your brain starts to shut down. You can't appreciate how lovely these girls are. It's human nature, or human psychology.
-Site is strictly for soft, softcore teen. No hardcore action.
-Almost all models are white. Very little variation in race, or age. Most models start at around 18, and some can continue shooting into the late 20s. But no older models in upper 30s or above. |
Bottom Line: |
CONS (continued):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is standard for porn sites.
-The MetArt network used to have a system where if you were a member of one of their sites, you had access to membership plans to join most of the other sites for a discounted price of around $10/month. But they dropped that system years ago.
-MetArt used to have a live cam show offering where some MetArt models or other models would put on free shows. The models also offered private shows, but the free shows lasted 30 minutes or more, and the girls were friendly. There wasn't a lot of nudity in those shows, but it gave you a chance to interact with the models. They dropped that system many years ago, and went with a more commercial type cam show, where the performers and the sytem itself encourages the viewer to pay: These shows, both public and private, can become very expensive. It can be cheaper to go to a strip club and watch the strippers versus watching the modern live cam show.
BOTTOM LINE (start of):
On 2017-01-25, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,285
Galleries: 16,678
Videos: 1,362
Contributing photographers: 272
On 2018-10-30, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,548
Galleries: 19,089
Videos: 1,544
Contributing photographers: 283
Models are 18-30 years old.
Mostly Eastern European.
Most of the models start out at around 18, but many continue to be shot at MetArt for years, so you have some models that started at 18 that are still shooting at 30.
Some models have over 50 sets at MetArt.
Galleries: 19,089
Galleries include indoor and outoor locations.
The technical quality of the galleries is usually outstanding.
Videos: 1,544
Most videos are a waste of time.
You have beautiful girls, getting naked, and the Wow factor is zero: almost all videos are boring.
A lot of time and money are spent making these videos: I don't know how photo sets of a model can be erotic or beautiful, while a video of the same model is almost always boring, but MetArt has perfected the Art of Making Boring Videos of beautiful naked women.
I have found a few videos that were slightly interesting: Must have been a mistake on MetArt's part, because I've stopped watching their videos.
Also, the background music on these videos is often jarring.
If you're going to watch a video, I recommend turning off the sound.
Contributing photographers: 283
Instead of one or a few photographers contributing to the site, you have access to almost 300 professional photographers of erotic beauty.
I'm giving the site a score of 95.
The site is for soft, softcore teen porn fanatics.
As such, it's such a fantasic site, for a low price, that it deserves a score of 95 or even higher.
Not all sets or photographic styles will appeal to everyone, but you have access to:
-A huge backlog of galleries of teen models.
-A huge number of attractive models: Some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-A huge number of daily updates: 4 updates daily, except the first day of the month is 6 updates.
-A very low membership price: PU discounted membership is $19.99/recurring monthly. There is currently a PU discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
If you do a google search, you can sometimes find a discounted price under $10.00 for the first month.
One problem with such a large mega-site: you become bored with physical beauty. You have such a catalog of beutiful girls, thousands of galleries, that you just don't appreciate what you have.
That's human nature.
Except some of the models are freaking hot; other models are freaking cute.
Unless you are dead inside, there should be plenty of sets that will appeal to you.
But if you want hardcore, MetArt is strictly soft, softcore.
In my opinion, MetArt is the finest softcore site on the internet.
It deserves a score in the high 90s.
The only major flaw are the boring videos. But I've never found a good site for softcore videos. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|