NS Romance (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Membership in the New Sensations network gives you access to all sites in the network.
None of the sites requires an extra premium payment to access.
-Login and member pages are secure: https. Which means the government has less of a record of your visits. And your account details are better protected against hacking.
-The videos have a strong plot element: a good part of the video is the backstory, with no sex, just actors explaining the plot: this adds meaning to the sex, it's not just two or more bodies slapping against each other.
-Videos have a trailer, if you want to get a quick idea of the action.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. You don't have to pay a premium fee for downloading, as some porn sites are trying to do.
-You have multiple choices for the definition of your streaming and downloading:
Streaming: MP4 3840x2160-4K-25000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-3000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-6000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-9000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-12000kbps, MP4 3840X2160-4K-16000kbps. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Downloading: MP4 3840x2160-4K-25000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-3000kbps, MP4 1280x720-4K-6000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-9000kbps, MP4 1920X1080-4K-12000kbps, MP4 3840X2160-4K-16000kbps.
-The photoset accompanying each video is made of screenshots from a software program: the screenshot quality has improved: but given how attractive some of these models are, you wish the quality was even better, because some these models are attractive to gorgeous, and they really deserve MetArt or MPL Studio quality photos. So it's a toss-up whether the photosets are worth collecting: the models can be very attractive physically, but the quality of the screencaps, although much improved, deserves better if you want to collect them.
CONS(START OF):
-The network navigation is sloppy. The sites are not clearly separated from each other.
When you enter a particular site, it's difficult to tell what site you are in: the site contents are not clearly separated from other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
So searching for all content of each site is a problem. Finding how many sites belong to the network is a problem.
I was a member of the network in July 2017, and they seem to have done a network update since then.
I certainly don't remember the navigation problems I see today: a year ago, navigation was easy, it was easy to find the content of each site. Today, the content seems to be jumbled together.
A simple example: in July 2017, I stated in a review that the New Sensations network had 25 sites.
marcdc1, in his 11-06-18 review of New Sensations stated the network has 26 sites.
The Best Porn review, dated 11-12-18, says the network gives access to 12 sites.
As I said, membership in the network gives access to all the sites in the network.
Sometimes The Best Porn reviews are not entirely accurate. But to go from 12 sites access to 26 sites access seems like a big jump.
The search is site-specific. When you search for the content of a model, the search results are limited to the site you are currently logged in to.
-To search the entire network for a model's content, log in to the New Sensations Network Home, and that should give you her content at the network.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
When you score a particular site, the site factors include:
-Amount of content.
-Quality of the content.
-Site structure. Is the site easy or difficult to use? To find the content. To stream or download the content.
The New Sensations network has a large amount of high quality content.
The models can be attractive to very attractive.
The stories can add flavor to the sex.
You have multiple choices for download and streaming the videos.
The videos are professionally shot.
I wish the photosets were higher quality, because some of the models are very attractive.
But finding the content can be difficult.
Even knowing what site you are in can be difficult, because the videos and photosets are all marked "New Sensations", not marked by the site name.
I'm giving the NS Romance site a score of 85.
Because the good quality content is there: but finding it can be a hassle.
There might be a chronological listing of the site contents for each site,
or an alphabetical listing: but I haven't found those yet.
So a lot of the content seems buried in a jumbled mess. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
