Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sex Art

Sex Art (0)

Newbie
90*
lk2fireone (0) 01-14-19  07:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAPS, BECAUSE MY EYES ARE POOR. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUTING, BUT IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO SEE (AND EDIT) RATHER THAN SQUINTING TO SEE TINY LETTERS.

ANYONE WHO IS REALLY ANNOYED BY CAP LETTERS CAN SKIP THIS REVIEW, AND WHATEVER OTHER POSTS I MAKE.

ALSO: I WROTE AN EARLIER REVIEW A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AGO ABOUT THE SEX ART SITE.
I THINK THAT REVIEW WAS EVEN BETTER THAN THIS ONE. MORE PROFESSIONAL. GIVES A BETTER OVER-VIEW OF THE SITE. BUT BOTH REVIEWS ARE ACCEPTABLE, IN TERMS OF GIVING A FLAVOR OF THE SITE, I HOPE.

PROS:
-SEX ART IS PART OF THE MET ART SITES. SO YOU CAN EXPECT A QUALITY EXPERIENCE:
-SEX ART IS A GLAMOUR SITE. THE MODELS (MANY OF WHICH ARE FEATURED AT OTHER MET ART SITES) ARE SOME OF THE MOST ATTRACTIVE WOMEN IN THE INTERNET.
-THE SITE STRUCTURE AND NAVIGATION ARE EXCELLENT.

CONTINUED IN THE CONS SECTION:
Cons: PROS (CONTINUED):
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-NO STREAMING LIMITS.
-DAILY UPDATE.
-PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $19.95/MONTH RECURRING.
-SEX ART SUPPORT STAFF (PART OF THE MET ART SUPPORT STAFF) IS EXCEPTIONAL: FAST TO RESPOND TO EMAILS (WITHIN A FEW HOURS), AND HELPFUL. THE ONLY IMPROVEMENT WOULD BE IF THEY HAD A LIVE CHAT LINE, WHICH THEY DON'T.
-THIS IS A FULL-FEATURED SITE WITH ALL THE EXTRAS YOU GET WITH A GLAM SITE:
-YOU CAN STREAM ONLINE THE PHOTO SETS IN MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS.
-YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE PHOTO SETS IN MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS.

CONS (START OF):
-CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR. THIS IS PART OF THE MET ART NETWORK. SO IT'S A FULL-FEATURED GLAM SITE.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. THIS IS STANDARD FOR PORN SITES.
Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED):
-IF YOU DON'T LIKE GLAM PORN, THE SITE WILL PROBABLY NOT APPEAL TO YOU. THE MODELS ARE GORGEOUS, AND PRESENTED VERY ATTRACTIVELY.
-SOME MODELS APPEAR IN COSTUMES, TO GIVE AN EROTIC TOUCH. SO YOU HAVE TO BE IN THE MOOD FOR EROTIC GLAM. DON'T EXPECT CRUDE, HARSH HARDCORE, ALTHOUGH THERE IS A SLIGHT TINGE OF FANTASY HARSHNESS IN SOME OF THE PHOTO SETS AND VIDEOS.
-NO BONUS SITES COME WITH A MEMBERSHIP.

BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
SEX ART IS THE EROTIC VERSION OF THE MET ART SITES.
MET ART MODELS ARE BASICALLY PRESENTED AS SOLO MODELS, WHO, ALTHOUGH NAKED, ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SHOW MUCH SEXUALITY. VERY LITTLE SELF-TOUCHING. THAT'S THE WAY IT USED TO BE, ALTHOUGH SOME MILD TOUCHING IS NOW ALLOWED. NO BOYS ALLOWED (ALTHOUGH I DID ONCE SEE A FLASH OF A MALE PHOTOTOGRAPHER'S HAND AND WRIST IN A MET ART PHOTO SET, POSSIBLY TO ARRANGE A MODEL'S P0SE.
BUT SEX ART IS DIFFERENT:
A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO MASTURBATE.
A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO HAVE A BOY PRESENT, EVEN TO HAVE SEX WITH THE BOY.
A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO HAVE A GIRL PRESENT, EVEN TO HAVE SEX WITH THE GIRL.

I THINK OF SEX ART AS MET ART WITH SEX. MET ART IS BEAUTIFUL WOMEN WHO STRIP NAKED.
SEX ART IS BEAUTIFUL WOMEN WHO STRIP NAKED AND HAVE SEX. ARTFUL, EROTIC SEX. BY THEMSELVES (MASTURBATION), WITH A PARTNER (A WOMAN OR MAN).

GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 90.
IT'S A FINE SITE, BUT I PERSONALLY ENJOY MET ART MORE. BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE CATALOG OF PHOTO SETS OF GORGEOUS MODELS AT MET ART.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

skippy (0) Hey. Thanks for the review. I have been a member of this and pretty much all the MA sites off and on (and some continuously) since they were new and never really thought of this as "glam porn", but I guess perhaps it might be. I've always thought of glam porn as that photography stuff in the early 2000s and earlier with heavily made-up models. (Playboy-soft and Penthouse-medium maybe) This is....something different...something that needs it's own defintion...which they tried to do with the name Sexart. But the idea that it is not hard, rough or in any way crude is dead-on correct. So let's come up with a new name! :-)

Oh, and depending on the device or browser you are using, you can make the text pretty big. :-))

01-21-19  02:21pm

Reply To Message

2

skippy (0) REPLY TO #1 - skippy :

OLd Viv Thomsa is what I think of as glam porn.
01-21-19  02:36pm

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #1 - skippy :

As I get older, I lose patience.
So the easiest way for me to write and edit text is to use Notepad, and to write in caps.

I know that some people dislike reading posts that are made in cap letters, and there are work-arounds to using cap letters. But like I said, the easiest method is for me to use Notepad and cap letters.

And my eyes are getting poor. No need to go into particulars, but the older you get (I'm past 70), the more your body breaks down.

As far as glam as a descriptive, I'm not writing as an "expert" witness, so I feel free to write loosely. Especially for a site like PU, where some of the reviews are really poor, and yet they are accepted by the PU staff.

If any of my reviews have merit, fine.
If not, not so fine.
But I hope I'm contributing at least something to the site, with my reviews.

By the way, if you are ever a member of The White Boxxx, either through a direct membership or through letsdoeit.com, then I recommend watching the video titled "Her first threesome" with Lena Reif.
That one video is worth the price of admission to the site.
Lena looks gorgeous, and the action is like a super-glam video: where the emphasis is on visuals. The video itself is not the hottest I've ever seen, but the visuals are gorgeous, and this is what Penthouse and Playboy should have been producing back in the 1970s and 1980s, and it might have saved those empires from crumbling.

01-21-19  05:41pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.