Comment Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
AGREE THAT IT'S A SLEAZY CASH GRAB.
PLAYBOY HAS SUNK A LOT SINCE THE GLORY DAYS (1960S, 1970S).
I WAS A MEMBER OF THE SITE ABOUT 6 YEARS AGO.
I FOUND THE SITE, AT THAT TIME, TO BE DISAPPOINTING.
I FOUND MUCH BETTER QUALITY PHOTOS OF THE PLAYMATES ON NEWSGROUPS, AND MORE COMPLETE SETS OF THEIR CENTERFOLD SHOOT.
ALSO, THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS WAS POOR. THERE WAS ONE VIDEO OF STACY FUSON (SHE WAS FEBRUARY 1999 PLAYMATE OF THE MONTH) WAS SO BAD I INSTANTLY DELETED IT.
CUTE GIRL, BUT I HAD A MUCH BETTER COPY OF THAT VIDEO FROM SOME NEWSGROUP.
EXCEPT THAT THE NEWSGROUPS ON PLAYBOY AND PENTHOUSE SEEM TO BE LESS ACTIVE RECENTLY.
THERE USED TO BE CONSTANT UPDATES ON THE PLAYBOY NEWSGROUP SITES, BUT NOT ANYMORE.
|
03-02-19 08:44am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
I got burned by "a" Playboy site once too. I say that I was burned by a Playboy site because I think there are several that use the brand. I was signing up for a one-month membership and as I went through the screens to confirm the purchase I didn't notice that the site defaulted to an annual membership on one of the screens. Needless to say, the site wasn't sympathetic. It would have been a poor value for a month but it was a complete waste for a year. I downloaded some stuff but I've since deleted it.
|
03-04-19 04:32am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
This is good criticism - plus they change billers at the drop of a hat and then say, "Oh, that was an offer through.... - we're not with them any more". Ripoffs on top of ripoffs.
|
03-05-19 08:15pm
Reply To Message
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|