Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Shane Diesel XXX

Shane Diesel XXX (0)

Newbie
85*
lk2fireone (0) 04-19-19  10:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Note: Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site that stopped updating in February 2017. So most of the review will focus on the New Sensations network, which does update weekly.
-Heavily discounted membership price during holidays. Can get a 12 month membership for as low as $60.
-Network advertises access to 12+ exclusive bonus sites. But actually you get access to over 20+ sites with network access.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloading.
-Clean site design. Not cluttered with lots of ads.
-A lot of attractive models. Not a lot of tattoos. Not overly made up to look like porn stars, but look like really attractive girl-next-door types.
-Secure pages: https login and member pages.
-Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview.
-They upgraded the photosets at the network. A couple of years ago, all the photosets were poor-quality screen caps of each video. They invested in a better software program to make better-quality screencaps of each video.
Cons: -Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site. It hasn't updated since February 2017.
-I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network.
-The default billing agent is FXBilling / CSHelpCenter. I'm more familiar with CCBill and Epoch, but I've been a member of New Sensations for years, off and on, and never had a billing problem with them.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Some PU members might think the videos are too plain vanilla. Although the videos have cute models and are professionally shot in nice settings, the videos often lack the sizzle that some great sites can have.
-Sometimes the download options are strange: a video might have only 4K choices in different kbps choices.
Bottom Line: Network stats:
-Over 7,0000 exclusive hardcore videos.
-Over 2,500 porn stars
-Premium 4K UHD (no extra charge)
-Multiple streaming options.
-Multiple download options.
-Multiple weekly updates.

A lot of the videos have a setup storyline to make the sex more meaningful. This is a personal issue, but some viewers might want to skip the setup and move to the sex, while others might enjoy the setup. Depends on personal taste.
The sites cover a wide variety of niches. The search function is just OK, it depends on the criteria you're searching for. I mainly focus on the model, so, since the search examines the entire network, not just the site you're currently logged into, the search is fine for me.

I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network. Navigation is easy, the videos are professionally shot. There are a huge number of attractive models.
The models don't have lots of tattoos, and are not overly made-up, so they look like the good-looking girl who could be your next door neighbor, not like the porn star that lives on the streets of New York City.

Although the site and network are fine, there are so many porn sites competing for your porn dollars, that the New Sensations network kind of gets lost in the shuffle.
That is the main knock against the network.
There are some sites and networks that offer great value for your porn dollars:
The White Boxxx (part of LetsDoeIt), Pure Taboo (part of Adult Time), Teen Fidelity (part of the Teen Fidelity-Teen Porn-Kelly Madison group) have outstanding videos that are erotic and impressive as hell.
Watching some of the videos at those sites is an introduction to how great porn can be.

The New Sensations network is a fine network. But none of the sites in the network blew me away: some PU members might feels the network is too plain vanilla for their tastes.

I'm giving the site a score of 85. This is because site membership gives you access to the complete network. Actually, membership in any of the network sites gives you access to the entire network. If I were scoring the site by itself, the site would deserve a much lower score. But the network gives you complete access to all the sites, without any extra charge for 4K, downloading, or premium site charges.

It's a good network, but there are other networks that you might find give a better bang for your buck.
In spite of the fact that the network offers a $60 annual membership at times.

However, I did sign up for the $60 annual membership, because I do find the network is worth joining.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to lk2fireone!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.