Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ChickPass Amateurs

ChickPass Amateurs (0)

Newbie
90*
exotics4me (0) 05-09-19  09:43pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A relatively old amateur network that has a ton of content and very collectible scenes as well.
- Comes with 22 themed amateur sites.
- Two updates per day, check the Bottom Line on this pro.
- Quite a few major stars before they were major stars.
- Excellent TBP/PU price of $9.95 (5/9/19)
- Probably the broadest range of women you will ever see on a network, heavy, slim, white, black, brown, ugly, pretty, tattoos, implants, kind of like walking down a street in the United States!
- There is a fine line between simple navigation and layout and outdated. It definitely looks outdated but the site works very well and is easy to use.
- Very good download speeds (80% of max)
- Videos are very good technical quality, up to 1080p, some explanation needed in BL. Also has photos on most scenes and can be downloaded.
- Tagging system is pretty good but it might be too vague. It still is helpful.
- Covers most interests in hetero porn.
- 100% exclusive
Cons: - It looks outdated, like 2004 outdated but it really isn't bad. It does feel cluttered. That is nitpicking.
- It won't be for everyone. The various body types, the looks of the women, it's very amateur and varied.
- With the wrong person, the navigation could be very annoying.
Bottom Line: This network features some sites I was a member of many years ago. It can be misleading. The network is listed as first being listed in 2013. The little hub page might have started in 2013 but one site I know I have been a member of before, T&A Amateurs is in this network and it was first listed in 2005. The sites look that old too.

I mentioned in the pros, the explanation about the video quality. They are remastering older videos but are not counting them as new updates. This might not be a big deal to some but they do lack video options. Most of the ones I have looked at have a 480p option and a 1080p option. I would like to see a 720p option in there. A few of the newest videos even have 4K.

This type of site can be difficult to review. One of the newest updates is of Tori Black. She's certainly not an amateur but the content does not look like it was filmed recently either. The last time I saw anything about Tori Black she was talking about her boobs growing. In this video, she has hardly no boobs. They could have filmed this 10 years ago and just now released it. I also noticed Aaliyah Love listed as a "mature". There's a little fudging on "amateur" status but overall, the models are probably 90% amateur.

This is the similar style of shooting the ATK sites uses. Sometimes I prefer this especially with established models. It's very bare bones, little makeup and it has a real feeling to it more than the studio porn sites give.

The amount of content is very high. There are over 6,000 videos and over 4,500 photo sets. As I go through the content for the review, I am still seeing some "pros". I just noticed Jelena Jensen and Kagney Linn Karter. The content still comes off as amateur.

The selling point of this site (besides the price) is the amount of content combined with the vast majority of it being of models you've never seen or heard of while also having models you know but you will see them differently here. It's like a pro model just moved in next door to you and she's just a normal, down to earth woman.

If you wanted to complain about anything it would be the separation onto category based "sites". One is "Fuck the Geek". There is really nothing to show these particular models as "geeks". They look just like the models on T&A Amateurs. Maybe that is a sign of an amateur site. There isn't much production value in these scenes. They do have one site called "Chickpass Pornstars", so that is most likely where the random known models are coming from.

The navigation plays a big part in all this. You do have a hub which shows all recent updates no matter what site the update is from. The top of the page has "network sites" so you can go directly to the site you're most interested in. There is a "video" tab and a "photos" tab. It's hard to find that much fault in a system that is this simple.

They also have separate sites for race like T&A Asians, T&A Latinas and so on. They have a few they have created like XXX NJ for what they have tagged as "Jersey Girls".

I have got to the point I usually don't look at "bonus" content since it is usually streaming only and/or very low quality but they have 6 bonus sites that are very similar to their regular sites with similar content. Not for sure why these are called bonus sites but they are worth looking into too.

There is no way I would have thought this network would score that high but they have a very high amount of exclusive content and it is very high technical quality. The 480p videos even look good with 3000+ bitrate. It's one of those sites that feels like they decided to stop pouring money into making it look good and instead focused on getting good content.

Though I did mention it in cons, I will add here the models should be the deciding factor for most. They have over 1,600 models. You will find plenty of them that only have 1-3 scenes. I have seen at least one with 250+ scenes. The good part of this is also the bad part, the ones I have liked the most only have 1-3 scenes and are ones I have never heard of.

There is male/female sex, blowjobs, lesbian, strap on, threesomes and even messy for those that are into the messy porn scenes.

It's hard to take much off this site.
Amount of content, quality of content, amount of models, two updates per day, covers most niches, plenty of amateur models, some pro models, navigation is simple and straightforward, all with the one flaw being the outdated site design. I'm looking over that for the positives.

Segpay is the biller, not the best biller to deal with but I didn't have any problems with them. There was a tricky pre-checked cross-sale that I almost fell for. It told what I was joining "Chickpass network for $9.95" and had to click it. Just below it was a pre-checked box for GFLeaks.

Overall though, I am pleased with it. I would recommend it at the TBP/PU price to anyone interested in amateur porn.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (0) Excellent review, as usual.
Like a well-packed sandwich.
Some of your reviews are more interesting than the sites you review.
LOL.
(Not a criticism, more like a complement, I hope.)

05-10-19  12:45am

Reply To Message

2

Kody (0) "Probably the broadest range of women you will ever see on a network, heavy, slim, white, black, brown, ugly, pretty, tattoos, implants, kind of like walking down a street in the United States!"

I think that's great. I definitely like diversity in terms of body type when it comes to amateur porn. It's always nice when a new update comes and it's kind of a "reveal" moment when you first see her body and don't know what it's going to look like. I've found myself aroused over many different kind of bodies just because they looked real.

How attractive are their faces generally though? Would you say that regardless of body type/ethnicity, most have a beautiful face with some lesser attractive now and then, or just the opposite?

Reason I ask:

Your review of the site definitely made it sound like something I'd spend my money on. So I went to the site, but I had a mixed impression: "Our Featured Chicks" all looked very unattractive to me. But when I scrolled down most screenshots from the scenes seemed to have very beautiful amateurs in it that I'd enjoy watching.

05-11-19  03:00am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.