Kink.com (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Plenty of top tier talent
2. Site has been around for years so it has a large library.
3. Frequently updated
4. Top notch fetish themed videos.
5. Great download speeds
6. Older videos have been re-uploaded, joined together and in the mp4 format. |
| Cons: |
1. Site is showing it's age
2. Videos are small by today's standards.
3. As in ALL porn, scenes are repetitive but even more so here as it is a nitch network but it's what we came here for so it's a very minor neg.
4. A bit expensive at $39.99 a month ($29.95 if joined through the best porn link) |
| Bottom Line: |
My bottom lines are short and sweet and directly to the point. Note: I never score higher than 95, a top score always makes me think a webmaster is trying to entice new customers.
I have been a member of some of their sites on and off for years and loved the content. I was thrilled when I joined last year after a long absence to find that not only did they become a network but re-uploaded their older scenes joined together and in mp4 format. That is a massive accomplishment because their catalog is freaking huge and still growing steadily.
Videos are well shot and in my opinion are top notch.
Videos feature dom/sub bondage themes. This isn't your daddy's porn!
Now to my two biggest cons:
1. Site is in need of an remodel. It hasn't changed much in years. Notice I said REMODEL instead of OVERHAUL. The site is old and needs a few tweaks but is far from a train wreak. While the site is functional is just looks old and could seriously benefit from a facelift. The model index is quirky in that when clicked on opens up on either the newest or most popular models with no way to sort. I did find a workaround though: search a model name then when it loads delete the name in the search line and hit enter with it blank. Now it brings up a fully functional model index that can be sorted by male/female, body type, boobs, hair color, pubic hair, and ethnicity.
2. The videos are quite small by today's standards. The highest they offer is 720p. This is even the case with the most recent uploads. This for me is a very big deal, both of my monitors are full 1080p and I have a 4K tv connected to my pc so the 720 size always looks a bit fuzzy. This is the only site I have come across that doesn't offer 1080p and 4K on their newest videos. I can forgive 4K as that format has yet to be integrated on half the sites I frequent. Most of the sites nowadays have only three size videos: 1080, 720, and whatever size for mobile. I'm sure they shoot on digital cameras so I don't know why they don't offer at least a 1080 size. This is another issue that could be addressed in a site remodel, ditch the outdated sizes and come up to industry standard.
So to finish up, starting at 95, -4 for the outdated site, -2 for the expensive membership, and another -4 for the video sizes. I wouldn't join this site without a discount but do love the content. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
