Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
LKLK (0)
|
Plagiarism (joke).
Or maybe great minds think alike.
I posted a review of Pure Taboo on 12-11-19.
I wrote it was my favorite channel in the Adult Time network.
But I also wrote, as a pro:
"-The search engine searches the entire Adult Time network: it does not limit the hits to a particular channel. This is good and bad: good, because it makes the search for a model's content easier: bad, because if you want to search only for the model's content at a particular channel, I don't know how to do that. Overall, I'm glad the search is network-wide, instead of being limited to any one channel.
But if the programmer added a filter to search a single site, that might improve the navigation slightly."
|
12-17-19 06:34am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
That was a pretty good review. I could not help but notice that our reviews covered some pf the same points.
Different perspectives and different styles of writing, but we basically agree.
LK do you want to have the last word?
|
12-17-19 07:41am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
LKLK (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :
I think all 3 reviews (exotics4me, mbaya, and LKLK) gave a good to excellent review of the channel, as well as the importance of the Adult Time network.
So any casual reader of the reviews should have gained a good overview of what the channel offers. Which should be one of the main reasons for a review.
Except that lately, my reviews have taken a slightly different approach. I'm like a travel writer sampling sites instead of giving a more disciplined approach. So I tend to throw a lot of random thoughts into my reviews.
Which could be distracting.
The PU staff does allow freedom of expression, which I do appreciate.
Otherwise, I would have to follow a more formulaic approach, which gets boring after writing so many reviews.
|
12-17-19 10:17am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
