My Naked Dolls (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Up to 4k and 80mpx photos and videos
-easy to cancel or modify your subscription
-Content is erotic glamour photos and videos. Basically softcore. Mainly solo models, but some sets with masturbation and toys and girl/girl scenes.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-Easy navigation. This is basically a small site, you have photo sets and videos of different models.
You can search for a model's content, but other than that, the search seems pretty useless.
-You can tag your favorite photo sets, videos and models for easy access.
-There is little to no advertising for other sites on the member pages, which is a rarity.
-There is no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Low annual price is $45/year recurring. The other memberships don't make a lot of sense, because they price a monthly membership or other membership options way too high.
-Members can vote to like or dis-like the photo sets and videos, and post comments on the photo sets and videos. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Negative comments are allowed, and not deleted. Unlike some sites, which remove negative comments by members almost immediately.
-Files download with the default title of the set or video plus the name of the model.
-The watermark for the site is small and placed at the bottom right corner of the photo, so it's basically out of the way.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor.
-To log in, you have to check a box to prove you are not a robot (this is a simple captcha, that is easy to check).
-The site is basically softcore glamour. With the emphasis on solo models. If you want hardcore eroticism, this site is not for you.
-There is a news section, but it's barely used. He was trying to upgrade the content, add a personal touch to the site. But aside from a few photos of some models, and a few replies by members, this section could be deleted.
What it shows is that Tony Murano does not visit the site very often. |
| Bottom Line: |
Number of photo sets: 656
Number of videos: 75
Most of the site content is exclusive.
There is at least one photo set that was previously posted at MetArt years ago.
The videos can be streamed or downloaded in 360p, 540p, HD, Full Hd.
The photo sets can also be streamed or downloaded 360, 540p, HD, Full Hd.
The photo sets can also be streamed and/or downloaded in Ultra HD, as well.
I rated the site with a 90 on my review that I posted on 2018-05-13.
The main factors for the high score, and recommendation, were:
-I enjoy the work of Tony Murano, the contributing photographer.
He has an eye for attractive models. The models are in their late teens or early twenties.
The site is basically softcore nude glamour.
There are videos, but most of the content is photo sets.
This is not a mega site like MetArt, MPL Studios, Femjoy. It's the work of one photographer.
But it has 656 photo sets of attractive models, 75 videos.
The annual price is $45, which seems like a bargain.
The low price, combined with the quality of the softcore glamour sets, gives the site a score of 90.
That's my opinion.
TBP rated this site a score of 78 in 2017-08-04.
I can only assume the reviewer was not as impressed with the quality of the photo sets as I am.
The site did a recent update for the public preview, where they made the public preview page more attractive.
But they also updated a new pricing schedule, that makes the membership price much higher, except for the 1-year recurring membership at $45, which is a drop from the $50/year former price.
The prices for the other membership terms are way out of line: they price a non-recurring membership for 1 month at $30, or a non-recurring membership for 1 year at $75, when you can join for $45/year recurring.
And unless you are a complete newbie, you will realize you can join any recurring membership, to get a lower rate, and then cancel as soon as you want, if you don't want to get rebilled.
Whoever decided on the new membership pricing plans made a serious mistake: he has probably turned away a lot of potential members who might have sampled the site at a lower monthly rate.
Which is a shame, because these sites need members to support the site financially. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
