Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit First BGG

First BGG (0)

Newbie
90*
LKLK (0) 03-17-20  10:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -They are working constantly to update and improve the site and network.
-They did a recent update for the network public page, making the page brighter and more inviting.
The network public page shows nice-sized thumbnails for latest videos, featured videos, newest girls,
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 33 teen porn sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates around 5 days a week, with exclusive content.
-The site (and some of the network) has 4K videos, as well as lower definition videos.
-The site (and some of the network) has high resolution images.
-Navigation is easy. It's easy to switch between sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Although this is not a glamour site or network, the girls are basically white teens who are attractive.
Cons: -If you join through the main TMW site, the search returns content from the entire network.
However, if you join through one of the other sites in the network, the search returns only content from the site you joined through. So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site.
-I think they did a recent update on the search engine and messed it up. Assume you log in through the TMW site, and not the First BGG site. You enter the name "Lolly Small" in the search. What you are returned is a huge number of hits, most of which have nothing to do with Lolly Small. The search for "Lolly Small" returns 301 results. And Lolly Small only has 10 videos at the network.
I've been a continuous member of the network for over 3 years now, and the search at the TMW site used to be good, returning only results that matched the model's name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So easy to hack.
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
-Although the network has a daily update, the update rate for the site is approximately 1 per month.
2018-11-27 the site had 110 videos.
2020-03-17 the site has 121 videos.
So over time, the update rate is less than 1 per month.
The reason for the slow update rate for the site is that updates are spread over the network, so the BGG site gets less than 1 new video plus matching photo set per month.
Which is more than acceptable, since there is a huge amount of teen content in the network to look through.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as familiar as CCBill or Epoch. But I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem. So I'm listing it as a minor con, but it's not really a con. I've used Vendo for WowGirls, DDF Network, Ultra Films, Lust Week, etc.
-Many of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years. The quality of the archive sites is definitely less than the current output of videos and photosets. Some of the archive sites do not have streaming; you have to download the video or photo set to see it.
-The photosets have a zip file, but it's only in 1 definition, not low, medium and high.

BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: One guy on two girls. Forget love, these girls are interested in sex. And they are willing to share a guy.
Site stats:
videos: 121
photo sets: 121

As you might be able to tell, TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
This review is on First BGG, but I believe the details on the TMW network, of which First BGG is part of, can be helpful.

What I like about the site and network:
The models are mainly attractive young teens, who put on a good show: they seem to enjoy the sex.
The models are real teens. Not a lot of fake boobs. Not a lot of tattoos.
This is not a glam site or network.
The network started around 2005.
The site (First BGG) started around 2011.
The network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore collection of sites.
Over time, they have spent a lot of time, effort and money into upgrading the network and included
sites.
For the last few years, you can stream or download the most recent videos in 360p up to 2160p.

The upgrades included:
With a membership in any site in the network, you now get access to all the sites (currently 33 sites.)
Better equipment for filming and photographing, better, more expensive sets, better costumes (the costumes are street clothes, but better street clothes than what they used to wear), better lighting, sound control.
The videos and photo sets from the last few years are excellent quality: not glamcore, but still excellent quality.
The quality obviously gets worse as you look at the older material.

First BGG is part of the TMW network. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore network. I wouldn't say that First BGG is one of the top sites in the network, but it is a worthwhile addition to the network.

I'm giving the site a score of 90. That is basically because joining any site in the network gives you access to the entire network.
If I had to score the First BGG by itself, without network access, the score would be much lower.
But it's still a good site, with 121 videos and matching photosets.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

mbaya (Disabled) Correct me if I am wrong. I must be getting senile.

This is a network review.

The only facts about the site per se are that it updates once a month and there are 121 videos and photo sets.

I must have missed the rest of the information about the site.

Tom, what do you think? Teen Mega World had a review by the author last July so it is not a year yet.

03-17-20  10:53am

Reply To Message

2

Tom D Admin
PU Staff
REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

I don't think you're senile, but I do think you're still holding onto how things used to be.

I explained to you that if the system will let you write a review/rereview, you are free to do so with the exception of clone sites. I am not going to police people for things the system doesn't stop them from doing.

The reviewers for Rabbit's Reviews and The Best Porn, do at times end up updating the same site within a year depending on how many staff are available when a request comes through.

So by all means, take advantage of that new liberty for any you'd like to revisit.

As to the network versus individual site, I don't think you can always separate the two throughout the entire review. And LKLK has done a solid job of talking about the network when appropriate while still talking about the specific site.

And while I can respect your opinion if you disagree, at the end of the day, it is my decision.

So far, I've only had to reject a handful of reviews for being short and really not meeting the criteria at all. At least one of those was greatly improved and got approval on the second submission. So, for my part, I'm thrilled with everyone's efforts, including your own!

03-17-20  05:06pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.