Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit James Deen

James Deen (0)

Newbie
80*
KayTBuffs (0) 04-25-20  09:36pm
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Straightforward, gonzo style porn featuring James Deen.

846 scenes with new scenes added regularly, but not on a set schedule.

Photos, screencaps and videos can be downloaded.

Videos go up to 4K, some oddities in the video quality specifications.

Mostly rough sex if you're into that.

Blend of scenes which will be in cons too. Male/female, threesomes, casting, etc...
Cons: This seems like some kind of best of James Deen site. There are scenes from other sites and other studios and scenes from JamesDeen.com. This causes the next con.

The video quality varies from scene to scene. Based on user comments some of the scenes are very old and are being "found" one comment says, "Great find", it is one of the newest scenes released, but tops out at 720p.

I was only a little familiar with James Deen. The scenes are as much about him putting what looks like wrestling holds on women as sex.

Navigation is poor.
Bottom Line: I once read an article about James Deen being porn's "boy next door". I remember the article well. It talked about how women loved being in scenes with him because he was gentle and so nice.

So, what happened? You know you're going to get a scene that might be harsh when it has a 20 second warning before the scene starts that explains everyone in the scene is a consenting adult, no one is being forced and people watching should not try this at home. In one scene, he has the woman's arms pulled up behind her back while bending her over a sofa.

It's not that the scenes are bad. It's more like a feeling that you know what's going to happen in every scene. She's not going to moan enough from the sex so he's going to bend her arms behind her head or slap her.

He's really not as obnoxious as I expected. It does seem like he gets off on the woman feeling pain, but other than that, it's very basic and straightforward sex. He really doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone. I just was expecting some of that content of the "boy next door". It's more like the guy you picked up at the bar.

There are tags, clickable model names and that's the limit of the navigation. The site could be put together better. It looks like the most time spent was on the terribly written scene descriptions like, "He continued fucking her from behind as he pull her by the hair and neck. Halfway through it, he pins her down and gets power fucking to the next level. It may be a rough fucking for Sadie, James was nice enough to lick her fuck holes from time to time." That is about 1/8th of the scene description.

The biggest problem is the scenes are from different sites. I even saw one from Bang.com and it says on it, "Exclusive Bang.com scene" on James Deen's site. This does make the quality of the scenes vary throughout the site.

The time of the scenes also varies greatly from 19 minutes to 55 minutes. If you like James Deen and like rough sex, especially anal, you would probably like this site. For me, it's an okay site with some good scenes thanks to the women in the scenes.

You can download videos, photo and screencaps. The video quality is hard to describe or list since they are blending in James scenes from other sites. One of the newest is with a model that has bios up saying she retired in 2014. Maybe the Coronavirus is causing them to bring in these scenes from other sites?

You could do worse than this site, but I think your odds would be just as good to do better.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

LKLK (0) It doesn't need a 300 pound gorilla to hurt a woman during sex.
There were several reports by porn stars, a few years ago, that James Deen had been overly physical during his sex scenes, causing the female models real pain.

Amber Rayne, Stoya, Tori Lux, Kora Peters, Ashley Fires and multiple other female performers all accused Deen of using excessive force during sex scenes.

Some of the models say they used the safe word, which is supposed to be a signal to stop the action.
Which Deen totally ignored, continuing to use force, hitting the model, raping her against her will, choking her, forcing her into uncomfortable positions.

So to write that a guy doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone seems naive.

Deen sailed through the accusations, saying he was "baffled" by the furor. He maintains he was innocent, and his career and popularity were never hurt.

04-26-20  03:03am

Reply To Message

2

KayTBuffs (0) REPLY TO #1 - LKLK :

I'm naive?

What do you call the models that based on what you've said here chose to do a scene with a man known to abuse women in the scenes? Surely they would know it. And what do you call a man of your age that believes slapping and choking is some kind of terrible form of abuse? There are women that love being slapped and choked during sex.

What I can do is put you in contact with the agency I work for. We have entire days we work with abused women. I've been doing it for 10+ years. I've seen women with 2 inch deep rope burn scars around their necks that can't talk. Women with their skin melted by battery acid. Women with their legs broken behind their heads. I don't know what it is about this site that makes everyone a know-it-all. Maybe I am being naive about why you reply since that gets you more tickets in the raffle? Stick to the political nonsense. You know nothing about abused women.

04-26-20  07:46am

Reply To Message

3

careylowell (0) REPLY TO #2 - KayTBuffs :

Okay, so you work daily with abused women. Clearly you are accomplishing much more in improving the human condition than what I do in my chickenshit job. But his post is not fake news: Deen has been accused by several women of abuse.
04-27-20  08:36am

Reply To Message

4

KayTBuffs (0) REPLY TO #3 - careylowell :

There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.

In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."

I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.

Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).

Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?

If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.

04-27-20  11:06am

Reply To Message

5

KayTBuffs (0) REPLY TO #3 - careylowell :

I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.

The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.

He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.

He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.

Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.

04-27-20  11:20am

Reply To Message

6

careylowell (0) REPLY TO #4 - KayTBuffs :

U have some very good points. I suspect the member in question didn’t complain about RearAdmirals more positive review as he, just like me, didn’t see it. I may log in 5 times in 12 hours then disappear for three mths. I see no conspiracy here.
04-27-20  10:36pm

Reply To Message

7

KayTBuffs (0) REPLY TO #6 - careylowell :

I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
04-28-20  09:11pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.