Sex Art (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a professional, high class offering of erotic porn.
-A large catalog of photo sets and videos.
-Updates daily. Either a photo set or a video.
-The main strength of the site is the level of the attractiveness of the models. Both the girls and the men are attractive. The women range in age from late teens to the twenties, and are either good-looking or beautiful.
-Videos are offered from 220p to 4K (UHD), in download.
-Photo sets are offered in high, medium and low definition zips.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. No limits, no extra charge for downloads.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month recurring. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale in join page.
-The videos lack heat. Although this is glamorized hardcore sex, it's more like a softcore version.
The site offers high-quality professional videos and photo sets, but the videos just lack heat.
-The videos often have a setup of 10 minutes or less, before the sex starts. Since the video runtime is 30 minutes or less, that doesn't leave much time for the sex. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Videos: over 1200
Photo sets: Over 1600
Number of photos per set: Over 100
The site theme is softcore erotic sex. I say softcore, because it's glamourized sex, not raunchy, but it would be considered hardcore. You have guy/girl, girl/girl, and solo female masturbation.
-SexArt is like a glamorized, erotic version of MetArt. MetArt focuses on photos, although it also offers some videos, and the videos at MetArt are becoming slightly more erotic. But there is no sex in the MetArt videos. There is sex in the SexArt videos (and photo sets).
-Although I think the videos lack heat, the photo sets are more erotic. Looking at Candy Kate, in her first photo set at SexArt, titled "First Time", posted Jun 04, 2020, she is a wet dream come true. It's a solo model set, but she is fucking gorgeous. Or maybe sexy is a better word, because I've seen prettier models, but none more luscious, more fuckable.
Note: you are supposed to respect the models, but respect has nothing to do with it: Candy Kate is hot. At least in the Sex Art photo set titled "First Time".
She has 2 photo sets at MetArt. The same model, professionally photographed in high-class glamour setting, but the set at SexArt is far more erotic.
The site is easy to navigate. And the search feature is excellent for bringing up a model's content at the site.
I can't describe what makes the photosets are SexArt more erotic than the photosets at MetArt. Maybe it's because I have seen thousands of photosets at MetArt, and I'm becoming slightly bored with that site.
But the photosets are SexArt are just more enticing. More erotic. I have a hunger for the model at SexArt, while at MetArt, I think she is cute or attractive, but no hunger. Even though MetArt has thousands of really attractive, even beautiful or gorgeous women.
I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It has a fine catalog of outstanding women. But outstanding women are common: Femjoy, MPL Studios, MetArt, and a score of other fine photo sites have 1,000s of outstanding, lovely models.
What could SexArt do better? They could put some heat into their videos.
But their photo sets are really outstanding. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
