Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Digital Desire

Digital Desire (0)

Newbie
92*
LKLK (0) 07-01-20  03:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons: -If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly.
Bottom Line: Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+


Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.

He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).

He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.

One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.

They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.

How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks.
Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.

If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.

Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (0) This used to be one of my favourite sites. I've just realised I haven't had a membership here since I last reviewed it in 2011. You don't mention if the site is still adding new content. Is it still updating or if not are you able to say how long since it last updated (assuming the content is dated in the members area) as I don't see any dates in the preview area.

You mention 700+ models, I noted 800+ in my 2011 review so sounds like they have lost content rather than added it. Even back in 2011 I found that many of the updates were simply recycled earlier photo sets re-released in a larger size.

07-03-20  01:34am

Reply To Message

2

LKLK (0) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

I didn't do a numerical count of the photosets and videos.
I just took those numbers, and the number of models, from some page or other.
Too lazy to go through the hassle of viewing all the pages of their models and videos and trying to add them for a single count.

I figured that a general figure was enough to give an idea of the amount of the content.

My last join was a few years ago.
So I don't have specific knowledge of the exact content from a few years ago (my memory is not great).
My review basically paints a picture of a site that could have existed in the 1970, if the internet had existed back then. With photo sets and videos that are in the style of the 1970s (except the internet wasn't around then).

Does the site update? Yes.

You get 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Are all of the videos new?
The video of Jana Cova, posted Mar 4, 2020, and Jillian Janson, posted Mar 9, 2020, might be older videos, since I don't know if these models retired. I had assumed they retired, and these videos might have been shot years ago, but I'm not an expert on them.
Neither one of the videos I selected were up to the quality of many of the Digital Desire videos I've seen over the years: the videos lack the sharpness and color vibrancy of the standard Digital Desire videos, which were excellent and outstanding quality.


Actually, I much prefer the older videos of my favorite models, such as Kenze Thomas.
Those videos just make the models much more appealing. For me, at least.

The photo sets and videos have a posted date.
So I assume that they are posting new material, or at least material that has been updated.
I've only started my membership at the site, so I don't have a good over-view yet.

But so far, my impression is that I prefer the older content: there are so many beautiful girls, that were photographed so exquisitely. And the videos were softer. Not as much emphasis on the solo masturbation. More of a tease, although there was plenty of nudity.

But yes, they are updating with new models, in the photosets and videos.
But I prefer the older content on the site.

07-03-20  03:14am

Reply To Message

3

tangub (0) REPLY TO #2 - LKLK :

Thanks for the reply and extra info. I went back and looked at the tour again and found the model index this time listed under the "more" heading which I never noticed before so was able to get a better idea of the models and their content.

I can't imagine the Jana Cova video would be new, she's been around since the early 2000s and must be at least 40 years old by now.

I guess I'll probably sign up this weekend since it's only $9.95 and I've seen no other holiday offers that interest me.

07-03-20  09:18am

Reply To Message

4

LKLK (0) REPLY TO #3 - tangub :

SexArt $5.00 for 30 days.
RabbitsReviews shows that discount.
Since I'm a member of SexArt already, I can't tell if this is streaming only, or if it includes downloads.
(When I click on the offer hot link, I open a member page of the SexArt site, and not the offer site details--since I'm already a member.)

MetArt $5.00 for 30 days.
Same thing. I don't know if that includes downloads.

I'm a sucker for low-priced deals.

Except I'm already a member of both sites, so those deals don't interest me.

LOL.

07-03-20  09:43am

Reply To Message

5

tangub (0) REPLY TO #4 - LKLK :

I'm a sucker for those cheap deals too but unfortunately I've only just finished a subscription at MetArt last month and I don't really feel enough time has lapsed since my last subscription at SexArt to want to go back just yet. Limited options I'm afraid for fans of solo softcore content these days.
07-03-20  10:20am

Reply To Message

6

Tom D Admin
PU Staff
REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

I happened to find a working login, so I can confirm that LKLK is right about the update schedule - one or two a week. Though with the whole COVID thing, they're posting some classic content - like the Jana Cova video.

I did some quick math and it looks like there are 1,700+ videos, 3,800+ photo sets and about 2,100 models. So his estimates were a bit conservative, but better to be a bit under than way over. And he covered so much more in such precise detail!

Hope that helps? Happy Friday!
Tom

07-03-20  02:09pm

Reply To Message

7

tangub (0) REPLY TO #6 - Tom D Admin :

Thanks for checking that out Tom, I figured there's plenty of new content since my last membership here so signed up today, using the PU referral link of course.
07-05-20  02:52pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.