My Dirty GF (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Small site. 25 videos. Why is that a positive? Because the videos are crap, you can see this right off from the first video to the last video. So it doesn't take a long time to realize the site is crap.
-The models at the site are Markus and Nicky. They are in all the videos. Two below-average people in looks (Markus is a plain guy, Nicky is an unappealing girl). How is that positive? Because you quickly realize that you will either find the videos appealing or not, because this is home-style porn that you either like or dislike. Not a lot of variety in the style.
-One thing that is positive is the text description of the videos: it's short, direct, and covers the plot of the video:
Examples:
"When me and Nicky got to the bath together and I touched her wet body my cock became so hard that I couldn't stand any second and not to put it in her. I even shot it on camera to remind that horny moment sometimes." |
| Cons: |
-Joining the site directly is expensive: $29.95/month.
There are often sales that offer $14.95/month if you join the network directly, or $60/year.
Except there are better networks around that are more expensive, but offer better quality content.
-This is an archive site. The site has has 25 videos. That was the count in 2008, that is the count in 2020.
-Resetting your password is easy, if you get locked out. However, there is a captcha that is difficult to solve, and usually takes a few tries to get correct.
-Login and member pages are not secure. Your browser will probably have a popup that states the login and member pages are not secure and prone to hacking.
-Username and password are computer-generated. Can't choose your own. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site advertises the content is 100% homemade. This is plus and minus: Plus, that you know it's probably true, because the videos are so cheaply made: cheap sets, jerky filming technique, poor lighting, a stunt cock and the girlfriend model that are, to put it kindly, below-average-in-looks.
That's the plus side.
The minus side: I look at two of the videos at the site, and that's more than enough for me.
Why would I waste my time on this crap?
Why?
Because I want to post a review to qualify for one of the raffle prizes.
That's the only reason I'm writing a review on this throw-away porn site.
The site advertising or site description is false.
Maybe I'm being harsh.
The site says the stunt cock is 23 years old, the model is 19.
That might have been true in 2008, when the site was launched, but it's now 2020, 12 years later, so the models must be slightly older today.
However, the site contents were probably shot in 2008, and have never been updated.
So, in that sense, the models were 23 and 19 when the videos were made.
The site states the model is sexy and gorgeous.
Maybe she's sexy. But gorgeous? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: To me, this is one fug ugly girl.
Porn and life is a learning experience.
I'm still learning that people can believe wildly separate things about the same object.
To call this model gorgeous is to claim that Donald Trump, our beloved president, is the kindest, most caring person in the world.
And Trump is also the most honest person in the world.
Earth shaking ideas that rattle my brain.
The videos have a posting date of 2013. That is probably a lie.
They were probably first posted around 2008, when the site was first launched. And then the posting date for the videos was changed to 2013, to make it appear that the site was updating, even though there were no updates. Some sites change the posting dates of their content to try to fool the casual viewer that the site is updating.
The site had 25 videos in 2008.
The site has 25 videos in 2020.
I can't swear the 2020 videos are the original 2008 videos, but I strongly suspect that they are the original videos.
I would give the site a score of 55.
That's being generous.
The site advertises homemade-style videos. That is true. The sets (I call them sets, but they used whatever was available: a cheap apartment, sex in a car at a park, and lots more videos at the cheap apartment in the living room, the bathroom, the bedroom.
On the positive side: with membership to this site you get access to the entire network of about 20 sites. Almost all the sites are going for the homestyle vibe. Many of the sites are throw-away sites that no longer update. There are a number of cute models, and maybe you can find some videos worth watching. But I would rather spend more money and find a network with better quality content that I can enjoy more.
The network is surprisingly large, with 3,258 videos, around 20 sites.
Mostly the sites go for a home-based amateur style of shooting: cheap sets, teen-based porn that requires little scripting, not a lot of care put into making the models or videos look good.
The vibe is home-based videos. Except a lot of the girls are cute, and the videos could be so much better if they changed their style to make the girls more attractive, to upgrade the videos with better lighting and equipment.
Actually, that is what the network has been doing with a few of the sites that still update: they are changing the video approach from home-style to more mainstream style: better lighting, better sets, that present the models more attractively. So if you joined the network, and have the time, there are videos that are worth watching. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
