Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit A Girl Knows

A Girl Knows (0)

Newbie
90*
LKLK (0) 09-09-20  07:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good sized site. 181 scenes.
-High quality production standards: extensive attention to making the models as lovely as possible, expensive sets, crystal-clear videos, good sound control.
-Unlimited streaming. But limited to 100 videos per month for downloads.
-You can watch videos streaming in 240p through 1080p.
-You can download videos in 240p through 1080p (but 100 video downloads per month).
-You can hit the "Skip" link to skip the introduction to a video.
Cons: -A few PU members have complained about slow download speeds from the site and network.
-Several PU members have complained about the 100 video/month download limit.
-At least one PU member has complained that download managers don't work well with the site or network.
You can't que up several videos and expect them to download correctly.
-Lack of variety of models: some PU members complain girls look like glamour models, too white, too slender, not enough ethnic variety or enough body types.
Note: You can't please everyone. The site (and most of the network) features attractive to lovely models, made to look gorgeous. So some people want a more natural style, where the models don't look so pretty or glamourous.
-A page of ads for other sites you have to pass through to get to the member's area. Then ads for other sites at the bottom of each member page. But a minor distraction.
-No 4K videos at the site.
-Photosets download with a computer-generated filename that is random.
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
Default filenames don't include the model name, video title, or any useful data.
-Photosets are tiny sets of 10 photos or less. These attractive models deserve a photoset of 100 photos per set.

BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Video count: 181 Scenes
Video runtime: averages 20 to 30 minutes.
Site theme: Lesbian action. Most of the scenes are two girls making out. But there are solo scenes where a girl is masturbating by herself.
The major attraction of the site is how attractive these models are. Almost all of the models are cute or attractive to lovely.
The site features mainly European models. I would guess Eastern Europe (from Russia or surrounding areas). Slender, white, late teens and twenties in age.

A Girl Knows features lesbian action. Mainly two girls making out. Not a lot of seduction: just two hot girls who find themselves attractive to each other and don't waste time talking, but start exploring each other's bodies with hands, lips, tongues, some use of toys.
There are some beach scenes, and the video photography is so crisp, you wish you were at the beach yourself, with or without the glamourous models, because the ocean water and waves look so good, especially in the heat of summer.
The site (and some other sites in the network) feature high class glamcore porn: Not a lot of heartcore, just attractive people who are enjoying themselves sexually. The sets are expensive, the videos are crisply photographed, the models are made up to look as attractive as possible. The models are A-Class models, with names like: Arteya, Lena Love, Lola Myluv, Lya Missy, Silvie Luca, Vanessa Decker.

My favorite channel in the network is The White Boxxx, because it's one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet: Lovely models, expensive sets, first-class videography. But A Girl Knows is a fine glamcore lesbian site along the same lines as The White Box. The reason I prefer The White Boxxx over A Girl Knows is that The White Box features boy-girl sex, instead of the lesbian sex of A Girl Knows.
That's just my personal preference.

Giving the site a score of 90.
If you experience the problems that other PU members have found, such as slow download speeds, 100 video per month download limit is annoying, download manager doesn't work with the site, member pages are slow to load, the video player is slow, etc., then your personal score of the site would be much lower.
Personally, I no longer download a lot, and the other problems haven't affected me very much. And I don't have any use for 4K videos, which some PU members really appreciate.

That's why I'm giving the channel a score of 90, because I think it's an excellent glamcore lesbian site.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

sonofzog (0) I'm one of the members who complained about download times. The response I got included this explanation:

"Because we don’t keep files cached if they are not required, if you are the first user to request a specific download, instead of downloading from a server closer to you (faster), it will download from the original storage server (slower)."

Which is not something I've ever heard from a website. Maybe the real answer is that they don't have sufficient servers to run such a large network of sites. I could run the question by some of the network admins I know but it might be a little awkward. I do know that the original Porndoe site never had these problems. And I really would like access to White Boxx again.

09-14-20  01:52pm

Reply To Message

2

LKLK (0) REPLY TO #1 - sonofzog :

Since I don't download a lot anymore, download speeds don't bother me as much as for most people.

But, if I did download a lot, and the streaming speed for videos was affected, I would lower the site score significantly.

Actually, I probably rated the site score too high, because I was basing it on my personal satisfaction, instead of trying for a more objective rating.

But that is why I made a point of showing the complaints by other PU members, who certainly deserve to be mentioned.

There are some networks that seem to have real problems with download speeds.
Team Skeet got a lot of complaints by PU members a while back about slow download speeds.

But when I posted that as a member of Team Skeet, I hadn't experienced slow download speeds, I was called a shill or a liar because I posted my experience at Team Skeet was different.
Sometimes PU members can be quick to criticize.
LOL.
(After the sting of criticism wears off.)

09-15-20  02:25am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.