Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Errotica Archives

Errotica Archives (0)

Newbie
89*
LKLK (0) 09-24-20  10:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -PU has a discount of $19.99/month recurring. However, look for holiday specials where the price can drop to $10 for the first month, or even lower. As a member of the MetArt network, I found an offer for $4.99 for the first month, rebilling monthly at $19.99.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the best customer services for any porn site. The only one better is the fame aid customer service, which has a live chat line that is 24/7, and answers questions within minutes. The MetArt customer service usually answers questions within a few hours, by email.
-The content is exclusive. Note: Staff Selections are exclusive to the MetArt network, but not to any one site in the network. Staff Selections are a premium item that has to be purchased separate from your regular membership.
-The models are mainly white, Eastern European. Most of the models are familiar from the other MetArt network sites. The models range from attractive to lovely. This is one of the strengths of the MetArt network:
Cons: PROS(CONTINUED):
how attractive the models are: however, the competing sites, like MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty and other fine photo sites also have a strong catalog of lovely models.
-On the initial signup to any of the sites in the MetArt network, you are offered a chance to sign up to different sites in the network for $19/month, $90/year, $400 for a lifetime membership.
If you are a real fan of one of the sites, one of those offers might be worth considering.
However:
-On a personal level, a lifetime membership is not worthwhile for me. On a realistic basis, since my health is not good, and I'm over 70, even $400 is not a worthwhile investment. I do have a lifetime membership to MetArt and a couple of other MetArt sites, that I paid for years ago.
If you're much younger, and you really enjoy one of these sites, a lifetime membership for $400 might be worth considering. Especially to MetArt, which has a massive catalog of photosets, a daily update rate of 4 sets,
Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED):
plus 6 sets on the first day of each month. MetArt, because of the massive catalog of photosets (and a large collection of videos, most of those videos are boring, in spite of how attractive the model might be), the large update rate, the fine technical features of the site (offering zip files in 3 definitions for each gallery, a good photoplayer to watch a gallery online, 24/7 excellent customer service, clean navigation, etc.) is the best site in the MetArt network. However, it's a softcore glamour site, emphasizing photos, which might be too bland, not hard-core enough for some PU members.

There was an announcement at the MetArt network:
30 Apr, 2020
Attention Lifetime Members, we have retroactively upgraded your lifetime membership to grant you full access to all Staff Selections.

If you carry a lifetime membership, you can now stream or download all past and future Staff Selections.
I'm a lifetime member to MetArt, SexArt, and The Life Erotic.
However, on a practical basis, access to Staff Selections doesn't hold a lot of value for me.
I don't think the Staff Selections are rare jewels compared to the normal updates at these sites.
That's my opinion, anyway.
I never paid to view or download any previous staff selections.
And I think the staff selections are basically hype, which I don't buy into.

CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The last time I joined (about 1 year ago) they didn't have a pre-checked cross-sale, but this time they did. Pre-checked cross-sales are common for the porn industry, but I believe they are a poor marketing gimmick. If you miss the cross-sale notice, you will be signed up to a short term trial that can turn into a very expensive monthly membership unless you cancel the trial almost immediately.
-Also I unchecked the remember me box. This allows the site to keep your credit card data. Too many sites have been hacked for financial information. So it's a bad idea to leave your credit card information at too many sites, because you are just increasing the chances your credit cards will be hacked. I've had several credit cards accounts hacked over the years, with charges made to the accounts from fraudsters. Some charges were made from Africa, some from states in the United States I've never visited. I've never been to Africa. Credit card fraud it pervasive. Try to reduce the places that keep your credit card details.
-I got a confirming email on signup. This was important.
The confirming email was poor.
It confirmed that my account was active with Errotica Archives.
The confirming email did not show the membership price for the first month, or the montly rebill price.
The email did not name the biller for the transaction.
The signup page showed "ECHST.NET 866-452-5108".
From Google, ECHST.NET is a payment processor.
However, the member page at the Errotica-Archives site states my payment processor is RocketGate.
CCBill and Epoch are the gold standards of payment processors.
It would have been nice if I had been able to choose the payment processor.
The member page at the Errotica-Archives site does not show the monthly membership price, either the first or succeeding months.
Separately, the confirming email was important:
On the join page when signing up, you enter a password for your membership.
The password for my membership on the confirming email was a different password.
That is the first time that's ever happened to me, in over 100 porn memberships, over 20 years of porn memberships. That I was given a different password from the site, instead of the password that I entered. (The password that I entered met the stated password requirements of the site.)

You might think some of the cons are trivial. But if I hadn't gotten the confirming email, I would have had to contact customer service to try to enter the site.
And it would have been nice for the confirming email to show the last 4 digits of the credit card I used.
Along with the first and continuing monthly membership price.

-They advertise daily updates. The average update rate has been 2 updates per week for a year or more.
-Regional discrimination. PU members (outside the US) have complained that the site charges more for a membership than US members are charged. I don't know if this is due to the site or the payment processor.

BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Models: 806.
Galleries: 4,510
Number of photos per gallery: 50 - 100.
Contributing photographers: 73.
Photosets have a zip for low, medium and high definition.
Films: 652

This is basically a photography site. The last video update was around June 2018.
That does not include the "staff selections". They tell you if you buy a staff selection, you "own" it. But that is a marketing ploy.
There is no DRM for MetArt network sites. So you "own" all the videos and photosets at the network (except for the "staff selections").
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

LKLK (0) "Owning" a staff selection does not mean you really own it. The copyright still belongs to the MetArt network (or whatever legal mechanism they are using). They say you "own" the staff selection video if you buy it, but your use is legally limited to viewing it on your personal devices. Legally, you can't send a copy to a friend or business partner, or upload the video to a commercial internet site. So it's really deceptive advertising to write that you "own" a video if you purchase it. You are really buying to right to download it to your own personal devices (computer, cell phone, whatever). Which is the same rights you have to the normal photosets and videos at the site and network. In simple terms, you have the right to view and download the photosets and videos to your peronal devices, but the legal ownership remains with the MetArt network.

Normally, ownership doesn't matter very much.
But in the past, the owners of one porn site made it a business to sue individuals that downloaded copies of photosets and videos from pirate sites.
They would sue thousands of private individuals for over $1 millon each since around 2012.
The sued individuals would have to hire lawyers and face exposure of a porn-related federal suit.
In one 3-year period, the porn company sued over 2,000 individuals.
The issue can get very complicated: but one factor is that the individual being sued might not have downloaded the copyrighted porn content: It's very common for neighbors to hack into a private individuals' WiFi.
Also, with some programs, you might be unknowingly sharing files with other people. Opening yourself to the charge of copyright infringement.
Even though it seems to be a rare event, if it happens to you, it can mess up your life: financially and socially. And a lot of people, even if they were innocent of porn copyright infringement, pay thousands of dollars to avoid the embarrassment of a porn-related lawsuit.

Errotica Archives Overview:
Errotica Archives is a member of the MetArt network.
As such, it follows the same model as most of the network sites:
You get an excellent site in terms of technical features:
-Https for login and member pages.
-Good to excellent site navigation. Easy to navigate. Excellent search engine.
You can set the page display options to your own preference:
Resolution: low, medium, high
Comments: show or hide
Number of thumbnails per page: 20-1000
Number of search results: 30-720
Sort films by latest, top rated, etc.
Set slide show interval: 2 seconds-20 seconds
Measurements: imperial or metric

CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY BELOW:

09-24-20  10:13pm

Reply To Message

2

LKLK (0) REVIEW CONTINUES:
And a host of other features/specifications to make the member pages format to your choice.

You also get 4,510 galleries, with 806 models. The models are almost all white Eastern Europeans, so there is not much variety in race or body type or age. The normal debut age for the models is 18 to early twenties, but a few models can last into their thirties. And the models normally range from attractive to lovely. Not a lot of tattoos. (Most MetArt sites photoshop erase almost all tattoos of each model from their photosets. That's the way it was since MetArt started, around 2000. But slowly the MetArt sites are starting to allow some models to show some of their tattoos in the photosets. In the videos, it's more difficult to erase tattoos, so a model's tattoos are more evident.

Technically, the Errotica Archives is first-class.
You get a large number of galleries, with attractive models.
The site is easy to navigate.
Streaming and downloading is good.
Note: I can get download speeds of 20MB/s at the site, which is the fastest download speed I've ever gotten at any site.

The films can download definitions from 270p - 1080p. That's because they stopped posting films to the site around June 2018. (I'm excluding the Staff Selection films, which are still being updated occassionally and can have a highest definition of 4K.)

Note: The Staff Selection items are a different breed of item. Not only do you have to pay extra to view and download these items, but these items are not exclusive to any one site in the MetArt network: instead, a Staff Selection item can be access from any site in the MetArt network. The same Staff Selection item can be accessed at MetArt, the Errotica Archives, SexArt, and all the other sites in the network. The content is exclusive to the MetArt network, but it's part of the network, not exclusive to any one site in the network.

What sets Errotica Archives apart from MetArt?
Basically, nothing.
Errotica Archives is like a junior edition of MetArt.
You have fewer photosets, fewer videos, fewer models, fewer contributing photographers, fewer updates.
Based on those factors, Errotica Archives is a junior version of MetArt.
Any photosets or films could be posted at either site, with no problem.
If you have limited funds, I would recommend joining MetArt, which has far more content, for the same membership price.
Having said that, I think that Errotica Archives is still a worthwhile join.
But I also think that MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty, and some other fine glamour photography sites are also worthwhile joins. The internet offers the porn consumer a lot of fine choices.

I'm giving Errotica Archives a score of 89. I think that, for the same price, MetArt gives you the same ease of navigation, the same excellent quality, and far more content.

09-24-20  10:15pm

Reply To Message

3

tangub (0) I don't like to appear negative but i feel this review is way too long and contains too much irrelevant and off topic information. Do we really need two paragraphs explaining the meaning of ownership and copyright?

Peronally I write reviews offline in a word document then when I come to copy and paste into PU if any of the pros, cons or bottom line sections exceed the charecter limit I take that as advisory that I have waffled on too much and need to go back and edit the review down a bit.

Regarding the site itself disappointing to read that they have gone down to two updates a week from the daily updates they had at the time of my last membership in 2017.

09-25-20  08:09am

Reply To Message

4

LKLK (0) REPLY TO #3 - tangub :

I agree my review is very long.
I put in a lot of extra information or thoughts about issues that were not usually covered in a site review.
The issue of copyright, for example.
I think it's misleading for MetArt to say if you buy the Staff Selection you own it.
You don't own it. MetArt owns it, even if you "buy" the selection.

Copyright infringement is not normally covered in a review, but it's more or less understood by the PU community.
Except that if you get caught up in a lawsuit, it can get very expensive.
PU members would probably not be as exposed to shaming as "straight" non-members.
But for the relatively few people who are targeted, it can be a serious issue.
Even if the target people did not consciously share porn illegally.

But I should make more of an effort to slim down my reviews, and make them conform more to the standard PU review.

09-25-20  11:09am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.